The subject matter of the present application relates to end mills configured for machining titanium.
Titanium can be considered a relatively difficult material to mill as the properties thereof can quickly degrade an end mill. Such degradation is believed, in theory, to be at least in part due to heat transfer of a workpiece made of titanium to an end mill machining the workpiece.
Aside from heat transfer, another consideration when designing end mills is evacuation of chips. Flute shape is accordingly taken into account during end mill design. CN 20145538, CN 102303158 and CN 202199817 disclose end mills having flutes shape in accordance with different mathematical models.
Yet another consideration is reduction of end mill chatter. Reduction of chatter can be achieved, in theory, by designing end mills with asymmetric features, for example, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,991,409, 7,306,408 and 8,007,209. FIG. 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,007,209 also disclosing an end mill having serrations (FIG. 1, reference numeral 7).
While many end mills appear similar, upon close inspection there are often many small but relevant differences, some differences being critical as to whether an end mill can achieve a desired machining operation of a particular type of material or under particular cutting conditions.
Commonly, cutting edges are placed at different index angles with respect to each other, helix, radial rake and axial rake angles may vary at different cutting edges and even may vary along a single cutting edge. Orientation, position and size of each element in an end mill may have significant effect on the performance thereof.
In view of the extremely large number of variations of design possible, there is ongoing research to try and find more efficient end mills, especially for machining specific materials such as titanium.
It has been found that an end mill combining a particular tooth shape and a particular flute shape can achieve surprising longevity when machining titanium under certain conditions.
More precisely, the tooth shape comprises a blunt cutting edge (the cutting edge being at an intersection of a rake cutting sub-surface and a relief surface) and a recessed rake sub-surface (hereinafter a “rake recessed sub-surface”) extending from the rake cutting sub-surface.
While blunt cutting edges could be considered detrimental, due to relatively increased machining power requirements caused thereby, experimental results have shown otherwise.
More precisely, a blunt cutting edge is defined as having an actual internal cutting angle formed at an intersection of a rake cutting sub-surface and a relief surface, the actual internal cutting angle having a greater value than an imaginary internal cutting angle formed at an intersection of imaginary extension lines of the rake recessed sub-surface and the relief surface.
It will be understood that use of the term “blunt” when referring to a cutting edge hereinafter is interchangeable with the definition above.
Provision of a rake recessed sub-surface adjacent a rake cutting sub-surface (i.e. the rake recessed sub-surface adjacent being recessed further into a tooth than an adjacent rake cutting sub-surface relative to an imaginary radial line passing through the cutting edge, or, stated differently, the rake cutting sub-surface being raised above the rake recessed sub-surface relative to an imaginary radial line passing through the cutting edge), is believed, in theory, to reduce heat transfer to an end mill when machining titanium.
Similarly, minimizing the length of a rake cutting sub-surface is also believed to reduce heat transfer by reducing contact of chips with an end mill rake surface.
Referring now to the above-mentioned flute shape, the flute comprises a concavely shaped bending portion followed by a convexly shaped ejecting portion of a particular size.
The bending portion is configured for bending titanium chips during a milling operation. A flute comprising a bending portion is illustrated in FIG. 4 of CN 102303158.
Generally speaking, convexly shaped flute portions can provide structural strength to a tooth (i.e. allowing increased thickness thereof) and increased moment of inertia. The presence of such convex portion, however, reduces a flute's cross-sectional shape which is believed to be detrimental to chip evacuation from the flute. A flute without such convex portion is illustrated in FIG. 3 of CN 102303158.
It has now been found that provision of a convex portion, albeit of a specific size, can provide an advantageous chip ejection effect during machining of a titanium workpiece (consequently, the convexly shaped portion of the subject matter of the present application is entitled an “ejecting portion”). More precisely, it has been found that such ejecting portions provide better machining performance during titanium slotting operations which have limited space for chip evacuation, with particularly good results shown at relatively high titanium machining speeds.
A further consideration when machining titanium is reduction of chatter, typically by asymmetric features of an end mill. An end mill having an asymmetric index angle arrangement was found to have comparative longevity.
For the purposes of the specification and the claims, an end mill with a symmetric index angle arrangement is defined as one where, at a cutting end face, every flute has an index angle value identical to an index angle value of an opposing flute. Conversely, an end mill with an asymmetric index angle arrangement is one which does not fall within this definition.
In accordance with a first aspect of the subject matter of the present application, there is provided an end mill for machining titanium, the end mill comprising a cutting portion having teeth alternated with helically shaped flutes and a cutting portion diameter DE; each tooth comprising a blunt cutting edge formed at an intersection of a rake cutting sub-surface and a relief surface, and a rake recessed sub-surface recessed in the tooth more than the rake cutting sub-surface; each flute comprising, in a plane perpendicular to a rotation axis of the end mill, a concavely shaped bending portion connected to a convexly shaped ejecting portion, the convexly shaped ejection portion having an ejection height E fulfilling the condition 0.010DE<E<0.031DE.
In accordance with another aspect of the subject matter of the present application, there is provided an end mill for machining titanium, having a longitudinally extending rotation axis AR and comprising:
In accordance with still another aspect of the subject matter of the present application, there is provided an end mill for machining titanium, having a longitudinally extending rotation axis AR and comprising:
It will be understood that the above-said is a summary, and that any of the aspects above may further comprise any of the features described hereinbelow. Specifically, the following features, either alone or in combination, may be applicable to any of the above aspects:
For a better understanding of the subject matter of the present application, and to show how the same may be carried out in practice, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Reference is made to
The end mill 10 comprises a shank portion 12 and a cutting portion 14 extending therefrom.
The cutting portion 14 has a cutting portion diameter DE and extends along the rotation axis AR in a rearward axial direction DB from a cutting end face 16 to a furthermost flute end 18.
The cutting portion 14 is integrally formed with first, second, third and fourth teeth 20A, 20B, 20C, 20D, alternated with first, second, third and fourth helically shaped flutes 22A, 22B, 22C, 22D.
Referring also to
Also, as shown in
Hereinbelow, similar elements initially differentiated with alphabetic suffixes (e.g., “20A”, “20B”) may subsequently be referred to in the specification and claims without such suffixes (e.g., “20”), when referring to common features.
Referring also to
The cutting portion 14 has an effective cutting length L extending from the cutting end face 16 to a cutting length plane PC extending perpendicular to the rotation axis AR and positioned where the flutes 22 begin to exit (i.e. become more shallow) or where tooth relief surfaces 33 are no longer effective. An effective cutting portion is defined from the cutting end face 16 to the cutting length plane PC.
The end mill 10 can be gashed, and in this example end gashes 34 are shown in
Each flute 22 comprises a convexly shaped ejecting portion 36A, 36B, 36C, 36D, a concavely shaped bending portion 38A, 38B, 38C, 38D connecting each ejecting portion 36 and each rake surface 28.
Each flute 22 can also comprise a corresponding one of first, second, third and fourth concavely shaped thickening portions 40A, 40B, 40C, 40D connecting an associated ejecting portion 36 and relief edge 32 thereof.
As shown in
Referring now to
It will be understood that actual end mill portions may deviate slightly from being perfectly circular. Accordingly, rake recessed sub-portions, bending portions, ejecting portions and thickening portions should be considered to approximately have such radii.
Referring to the first flute 22A as an example, measurement of an ejection height E is exemplified as follows: the ejection height EA is measurable between an apex AA of the first ejecting portion 36A to an imaginary straight line ILA extending from a nadir NA of the adjacent bending portion 38A (i.e., the nadir N being a closest point of a bending portion to a center point Cp of an end mill) to the associated, adjacent second relief edge 32B (the second relief edge 32B defined for convenience as part of the associated second tooth 20B, however also being associated with the adjacent, succeeding first flute 22A).
Each flute 22 has a helix angle H (
Exemplified feasible dimensions for different diameter examples are shown in the table below (with the dimensions relating to the 12 mm example corresponding to the end mill 10 example described).
As shown in
Referring to
In the example shown, each tooth radius RT has the same magnitude. Consequently, the cutting portion diameter DE is twice the magnitude of the tooth radius RT. In examples where the teeth have unequal tooth radii, the cutting portion diameter DE is defined as twice a sum of tooth radii RT divided by the number of teeth.
The tooth width WTA is measurable between a first imaginary line extending from the center point CP to the cutting edge 30A and a second imaginary line parallel with the first imaginary line and which intersects the relief edge 32A.
In the example shown, each tooth width WTA can have the same magnitude, at least at the cutting end face 16. For tooth strength, for end mills with index angles in an asymmetric arrangement, tooth widths have been found to be effective when varied at positions spaced apart from the cutting end face 16. In this example, the first and third teeth 20A, 20C decrease in width from the cutting end face 16 and the second and fourth teeth 20B, 20D increase in width from the cutting end face 16.
For simplicity, the following description is made regarding two teeth 20B, 20C only. It is noted that in this example the geometry of tooth 20A is identical to tooth 20C, and the geometry of tooth 20B is identical to tooth 20D.
Referring to
To simplify manufacture, the rake recessed sub-surfaces 48 can have the same shape, which can be a concave shape as shown in
Each rake cutting sub-surface 50 has an actual internal cutting angle γB, γC having a greater value than an imaginary internal cutting angle λB, λC associated with the rake recessed sub-surface 48 of the same tooth 20. More precisely, referring to
As best seen in
Each tooth 20 can have a rake cutting sub-surface length dimension LDC (shown only in
Each tooth 20 can have a radial rake angle β measured from an imaginary radial line LR of the end mill 10 which extends from rotation axis AR to the cutting edge 30, to the rake cutting sub-surface 50.
In the example shown, the radial rake angle βB of the second tooth 20B is −2° and the radial rake angle βC of the third tooth 20C is 2°.
The relief surfaces 26 can both form the same radial relief angle αB, αC, measured relative to an imaginary circular line LTB, LTC having the same diameter of the associated tooth 20. In the example shown, the radial relief angles αB, αC are 7°.
Test results shown in
In the tests end mills numbered as:
More particularly,
The results of the titanium machining test shown in
In view of the remarkable result, an additional verification test (not shown) was carried out on another titanium plate to confirm that the plate used in the test shown in
Notably, however, the results shown in
The description above includes an exemplary embodiment which does not exclude non-exemplified embodiments from the claim scope of the present application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4963059 | Hiyama | Oct 1990 | A |
5779399 | Kuberski | Jul 1998 | A |
5947659 | Mays | Sep 1999 | A |
6164876 | Cordovano | Dec 2000 | A |
6899494 | Walrath | May 2005 | B2 |
6991409 | Noland | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7001113 | Flynn et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
20020031409 | Sato et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20070154272 | Wells et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070196186 | Volokh | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070286691 | Glimpel et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20110013998 | Tardivo | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110085862 | Shaffer | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110217132 | Wells et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102303158 | Oct 2012 | CN |
10325600 | Jan 2005 | DE |
57132910 | Aug 1982 | JP |
S61 89418 | Jun 1986 | JP |
05038606 | Feb 1993 | JP |
2005 297108 | Oct 2005 | JP |
2007136626 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2010120099 | Jun 2010 | JP |
2011093036 | May 2011 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Jun. 11, 2014 issued in PCT counterpart application (No. PCT/IL2014/050058. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140227049 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |