The present invention relates to LED light bulbs which turn themselves permanently off when they reach the end of their useful life, and more particularly, to a scheme which slightly varies the end-of-life condition from unit to unit, or light bulb to light bulb.
There are three major technologies used for light bulbs today: incandescent, fluorescent and LED. Both incandescent and fluorescent bulbs have a well-defined end-of-life. This occurs when the filament breaks, and they cease producing light. Traditionally, for a plurality of light bulbs, “end-of-life” of both incandescent and fluorescent bulbs refers to the time when 50% of a population of them no longer emits light. In addition, because of the careful design of these bulbs, their end-of-life also corresponds to a specific level of light loss, which ensures that when the bulb needs to be replaced, it is at approximately the lowest acceptable level of light output.
However, because of the physical nature of the failure mode, there is naturally some distribution of failure times around this mean, which is convenient in application, as it means that not all the bulbs in a given install cycle fail simultaneously which might potentially cause under-lighting.
In the case of LED bulbs, failures are rare and occur after a very long time. Instead, the industry has chosen to define “end-of-life” for an LED bulb as the time at which it produces noticeably less light than initially, presently defined as 70% of initial lumens.
For many applications, the very long life time of LED bulbs is an advantage. Typically, most of these applications do not require replacing the bulb just because some degradation in light has occurred. However, there are other applications in which a minimum light level is required. For example, work and/or office areas can require a certain light level to ensure productivity, and/or a certain light level to avoid eye strain among office workers.
It can be appreciated that in circumstances such as these, it would be desirable to have the ability to turn off the LED light bulb when a specified level of light loss is reached. In addition, in order to avoid having all or a majority of light bulbs in an area turn off simultaneously, it would be desirable to have a variation and/or distribution of turn off times (i.e., end-of-life) of the light bulbs.
This invention has the object of developing an apparatus with a controllable end-of-life such that the above-described primary problem is effectively solved. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, it would be desirable to provide an LED light bulb that after a predetermined amount of time turns itself off, and wherein the predetermined time is variable or has some variation thereto. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, the apparatus includes an LED light bulb, a circuit for counting AC line cycles, a non-volatile memory for maintaining a record of the bulb operational time while the bulb is off, and a circuit to shut off the bulb when a preset amount of operational time has passed.
In accordance with one embodiment, a microcontroller counts AC line cycles using a resistor divider from the rectified AC line and an edge-triggered digital input. Every time the line voltage crosses some threshold, the resistor divider output triggers the digital input of the microcontroller, causing it to increment an internal counter by one. The counter may be preferentially arranged to have enough bits to count line cycles during the entire operational lifetime of the bulb.
During the time that the bulb is not energized, the counter value may be offloaded to a non-volatile memory, preferentially also inside the microcontroller. When the bulb is first turned on, the value in the non-volatile memory may be downloaded to the counter, so that the count continues from where it last left off. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, the power circuitry inside the bulb can be designed such that when power is cut to the bulb, sufficient energy remains stored in an internal capacitor for the microcontroller to offload the counter to the non-volatile memory so that the count is not lost.
When the counter value reaches a predetermined value set in the microcontroller's program, the bulb is turned off. If the bulb is turned on when the predetermined value has already been reached, the bulb fails to turn on, which ensures that once the bulb is “dead” (i.e., the bulb has reached the end of its useful life or “end-of-life”), it remains “dead”.
Finally, the predetermined value may be set to varying values in various bulbs in the factory. For example, a period of one month could be set as the distribution of end-of-life times, with 10% of the light bulbs coming off the line being in the first tenth of that period, 10% of the light bulbs coming off the line being in the second tenth of that period and so on. By staggering or varying the time (or periods) in which light bulbs reach their end-of-life, this ensures that no more than approximately one tenth of the light bulbs will fail at any one time, reducing light output by only one tenth, and ensuring that there is adequate time to replace all of the light bulbs.
The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention, and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings,
Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers are used in the drawings and the description to refer to the same or like parts.
According to the design characteristics, a detailed description of the current practice and preferred embodiments is given below.
The counter 150 counts line cycles (i.e., AC line cycles) during the entire time the light bulb 10 is on (i.e., when a source of power is being supplied to the bulb) producing a counter value. When the bulb 10 is turned off or “power down” (i.e., the source of power is removed or no longer provided to the bulb), the microcontroller circuit 110 off-loads (i.e., writes) the counter value to a non-volatile memory 160. The non-volatile memory 160 stores the sum of all the counter values (i.e., counts) to date during the time the light bulb is off. When the light bulb 10 is turned on or “power up”, the counter value (or value) of the non-volatile memory 160 is loaded (or read) into the counter 150, so that the count may resume where the count was left off. In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, when the light bulb 10 is first turned on, the value of the non-volatile memory is preferably set to zero (0).
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, when the value of the counter 150 reaches a pre-determined value, the microcontroller circuit 110 writes the value to the non-volatile memory 160 and shuts off the light bulb. If the input power to the bulb is toggled, the microcontroller circuit 110 tests the value in the non-volatile memory 160. If the value is at the pre-determined limit, the microcontroller circuit 110 prevents the bulb from turning on, and the bulb remains permanently “off”, which ensures that once the bulb is “dead” (i.e., the bulb has reached the end of its useful life or “end-of-life”), it remains “dead”. In accordance with an embodiment, the pre-determined limit can be randomly adjusted at production time to provide a plurality of lights bulbs 10 having variable end-of-life cycles or operational times. It can be appreciated that by varying the end-of-life cycles for a plurality of light bulbs, a scheme and/or method can be implemented which slightly varies the end-of-life condition from unit to unit (i.e., “light bulb to light bulb” and/or “location to location”).
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, the circuit 110 can also include a power-on reset (POR) generator or other suitable processor 170, which generates a reset signal when power is applied to the circuit 110, which ensures that the microcontroller 100 starts operating in a known state.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variation can be made to the structure of the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. In view of the foregoing, it is intended that the present invention cover modifications and variations of this invention provided they fall within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.
This is a U.S. National Phase patent application of PCT/US2009/005021, filed Sep. 8, 2009, which claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 61/096,253, filed Sep. 11, 2008, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference in the present disclosure in their entirety.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2009/005021 | 9/8/2009 | WO | 00 | 4/28/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/030332 | 3/18/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5126634 | Johnson | Jun 1992 | A |
5274611 | Donohoe | Dec 1993 | A |
5296783 | Fischer | Mar 1994 | A |
5666029 | McDonald | Sep 1997 | A |
5835361 | Fitzgerald | Nov 1998 | A |
6094362 | Domingo | Jul 2000 | A |
6281642 | Konishi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6348766 | Ohishi et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6362573 | Helbing et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6456015 | Lovell et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6504301 | Lowery | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6612712 | Nepil | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6639360 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6717374 | Krummel | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6791259 | Stokes et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
7075112 | Roberts et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7078732 | Reeh et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7213934 | Zarian et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7276861 | Shteynberg et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7288798 | Chang et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7319293 | Maxik | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7344279 | Mueller et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7358679 | Lys et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7489031 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7863831 | Vos | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7986107 | Weaver et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20020005697 | Morgan et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020149312 | Roberts et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040004435 | Hsu | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040113549 | Roberts et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040264192 | Nagata et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050084229 | Babbitt et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050179379 | Kim | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050224829 | Negley et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050243539 | Evans et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050243552 | Maxik | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060038511 | Tagawa | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060145172 | Su et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060176699 | Crunk | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060187653 | Olsson | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060244396 | Bucur | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274524 | Chang et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070001623 | Dudley | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070040696 | Mubaslat et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070090391 | Diamantidis | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070090737 | Hu et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070120507 | Uchida et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070228999 | Kit | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070291490 | Tajul et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080013316 | Chiang | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080013324 | Yu | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080024070 | Catalano et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080198615 | Klipstein | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080265789 | Bertram et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090001372 | Arik et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100109557 | Bouchard | May 2010 | A1 |
20100308739 | Shteynberg et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110084615 | Welten | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110163680 | Welten | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110248644 | Welten et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0658933 | Oct 2001 | EP |
07-99372 | Apr 1995 | JP |
3351103 | Nov 2002 | JP |
02061805 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2005060309 | Jun 2005 | WO |
2007069119 | Jun 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/004661, mailed on Oct. 2, 2009, 2 pages. |
International Search Report received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/004663, mailed on Sep. 22, 2009, 2 pages. |
International Search Report received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/005021, mailed on Oct. 16, 2009, 2 pages. |
International Search Report received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/005022, mailed on Nov. 2, 2009, 2 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/004661, mailed on Mar. 3, 2011, 6 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/004663, mailed on Mar. 3, 2011, 6 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/005021, mailed on Mar. 24, 2011, 5 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/005022, mailed on Mar. 24, 2011, 6 pages. |
Non Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/625,486, mailed on Nov. 14, 2011, 16 pages. |
Non Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 12/561,514, mailed on Jan. 27, 2012, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110210669 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61096253 | Sep 2008 | US |