The present technology relates generally to encryption, and more specifically to homomorphic encryption.
The approaches described in this section could be pursued but are not necessarily approaches that have previously been conceived or pursued. Therefore, unless otherwise indicated, it should not be assumed that any of the approaches described in this section qualify as prior art merely by virtue of their inclusion in this section.
Encryption is the process of encoding a message or information in such a way that only authorized parties can access it and those who are not authorized cannot. Encryption does not by itself prevent interference, but denies the intelligible content to a would-be interceptor. In an encryption scheme, the intended information or message, referred to as plaintext, is encrypted using an encryption algorithm, referred to as a cipher, generating ciphertext that can only be read if decrypted. A cryptosystem is pair (encryption and decryption) of algorithms that take a key and convert plaintext to ciphertext and back.
Encryption is used by militaries and governments to facilitate secret communication. It is also used to protect information within civilian systems. Encryption can be used to protect data “at rest,” such as information stored on computers and storage devices. Encryption is also used to protect data in transit, for example, data being transferred via networks (e.g., the Internet, e-commerce), mobile telephones, Bluetooth devices and bank automatic teller machines (ATMs).
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described in the Detailed Description below. This summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
The present disclosure is related to various systems and methods for an end-to-end secure operation using a query matrix Q_M having dimensions d×s. Specifically, a method may comprise: extracting a set of term components {T} of the operation using a term generation function; partitioning a range of a keyed hash function H(T) into a set of vectors {c_T}, where C(H(T))={c_T: c_T being a d-dimensional vector partitioning the range of keyed hash function H(T) into d-many bitwise components}, such that |C(H(T))|=|H(T)|=|{T}|; setting Q_M (j,m)=E(B_j,m) when c_T[j]=m for j=0, . . . , (d−1) and for m=0, . . . , (s−1), E(B_j,m) being a non-zero bitmask corresponding to element T from the set of term components {T} encrypted using a homomorphic encryption scheme E; and setting Q_M (j,m)=E(0) when c_T[j]≠m for j=0, . . . , (d−1) and for m=0, . . . , (s−1), E(0) being a zero bitmask encrypted using the homomorphic encryption scheme E.
Embodiments are illustrated by way of example, and not by limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements and in which:
While this technology is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings and will herein be described in detail several specific embodiments with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles of the technology and is not intended to limit the technology to the embodiments illustrated. The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the technology. As used herein, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” and/or “including,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof. It will be understood that like or analogous elements and/or components, referred to herein, may be identified throughout the drawings with like reference characters. It will be further understood that several of the figures are merely schematic representations of the present technology. As such, some of the components may have been distorted from their actual scale for pictorial clarity.
Encryption engine 112 can encrypt plaintext A to ciphertext A′ using an encryption algorithm and an encryption key. Decryption engine 122 can decrypt ciphertext A′ to plaintext A using the encryption algorithm and a decryption key.
In symmetric-key encryption schemes, the encryption and decryption keys are the same. In symmetric-key encryption schemes, source system 110 and destination system 120 should have the same key in order to achieve secure communication over communications link 130. Examples of symmetric-key encryption schemes include: Twofish, Serpent, AES (Rijndael), Blowfish, CAST5, Kuznyechik, RC4, 3DES, Skipjack, Safer+/++ (Bluetooth), and IDEA.
In public-key encryption schemes, the encryption key (public key) is published for anyone (e.g., source system 110) to use and encrypt messages. However, only the receiving party (e.g., destination system 120) has access to the decryption key (private key) that enables messages to be read. Examples of public-key encryption schemes include: RSA, ElGamal, Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC), and Cramer-Shoup.
Process 124 can be any operation performed (or application which works) on information (e.g., plaintext A). For example, process 124 can be a database search, Internet search, financial transaction, ecommerce transaction, word processing application, spreadsheet application, and the like.
Although depicted as separate systems, source system 110 and destination system 120 can be a single system where ciphertext (encrypted or encoded information) is created, stored, and (subsequently) converted back to plaintext (readable information). Communications link 130 can be various combinations and permutations of wired and wireless networks (e.g., Ethernet, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, mobile broadband, the Internet, etc.), internal/external computer busses, and the like, such as described in relation to
Encryption engine 212 can encrypt plaintext B to ciphertext B′ using a homomorphic encryption algorithm and an encryption key. Homomorphic encryption is a form of encryption in which a certain algebraic operation (generally referred to as addition or multiplication) performed on plaintext is equivalent to another operation performed on ciphertext. Homomorphic encryption algorithms can be partially homomorphic (exhibits either additive or multiplicative homomorphism, or an unlimited number addition or multiplication operations and a limited number of multiplication or addition operations) or fully homomorphic (exhibits both additive and multiplicative homomorphism). For example, in partially homomorphic encryption schemes, multiplication in ciphertext is equal to addition of the same values in plaintext.
Examples of partially homomorphic cryptosystems include: RSA (multiplicative homomorphism), ElGamal (multiplicative homomorphism), and Paillier (additive homomorphism). Other partially homomorphic cryptosystems include the Okamoto-Uchiyama, Naccache-Stern, Damgård-Jurik, Sander-Young-Yung, Boneh-Goh-Nissim, and Ishai-Paskin cryptosystems. Examples of fully homomorphic cryptosystems include: the Brakerski-Gentry-Vaikuntanathan, Brakerski's scale-invariant, NTRU-based, and Gentry-Sahai-Waters (GSW) cryptosystems.
Process 224 can be an operation performed (or application which works) on homomorphically encrypted information (e.g., ciphertext B′) such that decrypting the result of the operation is the same as the result of some operation performed on the corresponding plaintext (e.g., plaintext B). For example, a homomorphically encrypted Internet search engine receives encrypted search terms and compare them with an encrypted index of the web. By way of further non-limiting example, a homomorphically encrypted financial database stored in the cloud allows users to ask how much money an employee earned in a particular time period. However, it would accept an encrypted employee name and output an encrypted answer, avoiding the privacy problems that can plague online services that deal with such sensitive data.
Communications link 230 can be various combinations and permutations of wired and wireless networks (e.g., Ethernet, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, mobile broadband, the Internet, etc.), internal/external computer busses, and the like, such as described in relation to
A target data source may be in a single server or distributed over multiple servers of one or more servers 3201-320N as target data source 3221-322N. Target data source 3221-322N can be unencrypted (in plaintext form), deterministically encrypted (e.g., RSA), semantically encrypted (e.g., AES), and combinations thereof. When target data source 3221-322N is a combination of encrypted and unencrypted fields, each field can be consistently encrypted or unencrypted. For example, when data source 3221-322N includes an unencrypted “employee name” field, the employees names are all unencrypted, as opposed to some name names being encrypted and others unencrypted. By way of further non-limiting example, when data source 3221-322N includes an encrypted “social security number” field, the social security numbers are all encrypted, as opposed to some social security numbers being encrypted and others unencrypted. Data stored in and/or retrieved from target data source 3221-322N can be encrypted and/or decrypted as described in relation to
Communications links 330 can be various combinations and permutations of wired and wireless networks (e.g., Ethernet, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, mobile broadband, the Internet, etc.), internal/external computer busses, and the like, such as described in relation to
In some embodiments, system 300 encrypts a desired query (or analytic) to be executed over target data source 3221-322N using a homomorphic encryption scheme, such as described in relation to
At step 410, one or more clients 3101-310M can receive information about target data source 3221-322N from one or more servers 3201-320N. The information can include data schemas associated with data in target data source 3221-322N. Data schemas can be a structure of a database. For example, the information can include a number of records, fields in each record (e.g., name, telephone number, social security number, etc.), and the like in target data source 3221-322N. By way of further non-limiting example, the information can denote whether target data source 3221-322N is unencrypted, encrypted, and combinations thereof. When a part of target data source 3221-322N is encrypted, one or more clients 3101-310M can receive a decryption key—associated with the encryption method used to encrypt the part of target data source 3221-322N—to decrypt returned encrypted data.
At step 420, a request for an operation (desired query or analytic) can be received and optionally authenticated. For example, one or more clients 3101-310M (
At step 440, Q_M, a keyed hash function, and a term generation function are provided to one or more servers 3201-320N (having target data source 3221-322N). For example, one or more clients 3101-310M send Q_M, a keyed hash function (including its key), and a term generation function to one or more servers 3201-320N. The keyed hash function and term generation function can be used to divide data in target data source 3221-322N, so the correct records in target data source 3221-322N are mapped to the correct encrypted query piece, so the operation can be conducted in the right way. The term generation function can range from straightforward (e.g., retrieve a name field from a certain row of data) to sophisticated (e.g., run fields through a trained machine-learning model and the output is the term).
Optionally at step 440, metadata (e.g., identifying particular data available from target data source 3221-322N, specifying how data in target data source 3221-322N is divided, fields in data (from target data source 3221-322N) to be returned, etc.) is provided by one or more clients 3101-310M to one or more servers 3201-320N.
At step 450, using techniques of the homomorphic encryption scheme E and the keyed hash function, each of one or more servers 3201-320N can extract a set of term components {T} from target data source 3221-322N using the term generation function, evaluate Q_M over the set of term components {T}, and produce encrypted result E(R). At step 460, encrypted result E(R) can be provided by one or more servers 3201-320N (
At step 470, encrypted result E(R) can be decrypted using the private key associated with Q_M. For example, one or more clients 3101-310M can decrypt the encrypted result. Optionally at step 480, the result R can be decrypted using another decryption key associated with the encryption method used to encrypt the underlying data in target data source 3221-322N. Since Q_M includes only non-zero entries for terms in the set of term components {T}, the homomorphic properties of the homomorphic encryption scheme ensure that only results corresponding to the non-zero elements of Q_M are present in result R.
At step 520, the range of keyed hash function H(T) is partitioned into a set of vectors {c_T}. H(T)={H(T): T in {T}} denotes the range of keyed hash function H over the set of term elements {T}. C is a mathematical function that partitions the hash of a term into d components. C(H(T))={c_T: c_T is the d-dimensional vector partitioning the range of keyed hash function H(T) into d-many bitwise components}, |C(H(T))|=|H(T)|=|{T}|. For example, if d=3 and H(T)=000001001111, then c_T={c_T[0], c_T[1], c_T[2]}, where c_T[0]=0000, c_T[1]=0100, and c_T[2]=1111. c_T[d−1] should be distinct for all elements in H(T). When c_T[d−1] is not distinct for all elements in H(T), a different keyed hash function can be used and H(T) and C(H(T)) reconstructed.
At step 530, Q_M can be generated using encrypted bitmasks. For example, Q_M is generated using C(H(T)). For j=0, . . . , (d−1) and for m=0, . . . , (s−1), if there exists an element of C(H(T)) such that c_T[j]=m, then let Q_M (j,m)=E(B_j,m) where B_j,m is a non-zero bitmask corresponding to element T and E is the homomorphic encryption scheme such a described in relation to
The components shown in
Mass data storage 630, which can be implemented with a magnetic disk drive, solid state drive, or an optical disk drive, is a non-volatile storage device for storing data and instructions for use by processor unit(s) 610. Mass data storage 630 stores the system software for implementing embodiments of the present disclosure for purposes of loading that software into main memory 620.
Portable storage device 640 operates in conjunction with a portable non-volatile storage medium, such as a flash drive, floppy disk, compact disk, digital video disc, or Universal Serial Bus (USB) storage device, to input and output data and code to and from the computer system 600 in
User input devices 660 can provide a portion of a user interface. User input devices 660 may include one or more microphones, an alphanumeric keypad, such as a keyboard, for inputting alphanumeric and other information, or a pointing device, such as a mouse, a trackball, stylus, or cursor direction keys. User input devices 660 can also include a touchscreen. Additionally, the computer system 600 as shown in
Graphics display system 670 include a liquid crystal display (LCD) or other suitable display device. Graphics display system 670 is configurable to receive textual and graphical information and processes the information for output to the display device.
Peripheral device(s) 680 may include any type of computer support device to add additional functionality to the computer system.
The components provided in the computer system 600 in
Some of the above-described functions may be composed of instructions that are stored on storage media (e.g., computer-readable medium). The instructions may be retrieved and executed by the processor. Some examples of storage media are memory devices, tapes, disks, and the like. The instructions are operational when executed by the processor to direct the processor to operate in accord with the technology. Those skilled in the art are familiar with instructions, processor(s), and storage media.
In some embodiments, the computing system 600 may be implemented as a cloud-based computing environment, such as a virtual machine and/or container operating within a computing cloud. In other embodiments, the computing system 600 may itself include a cloud-based computing environment, where the functionalities of the computing system 600 are executed in a distributed fashion. Thus, the computing system 600, when configured as a computing cloud, may include pluralities of computing devices in various forms, as will be described in greater detail below.
In general, a cloud-based computing environment is a resource that typically combines the computational power of a large grouping of processors (such as within web servers) and/or that combines the storage capacity of a large grouping of computer memories or storage devices. Systems that provide cloud-based resources may be utilized exclusively by their owners or such systems may be accessible to outside users who deploy applications within the computing infrastructure to obtain the benefit of large computational or storage resources.
The cloud is formed, for example, by a network of web servers that comprise a plurality of computing devices, such as the computing system 600, with each server (or at least a plurality thereof) providing processor and/or storage resources. These servers manage workloads provided by multiple users (e.g., cloud resource customers or other users). Typically, each user places workload demands upon the cloud that vary in real-time, sometimes dramatically. The nature and extent of these variations typically depends on the type of business associated with the user.
It is noteworthy that any hardware platform suitable for performing the processing described herein is suitable for use with the technology. The terms “computer-readable storage medium” and “computer-readable storage media” as used herein refer to any medium or media that participate in providing instructions to a CPU for execution. Such media can take many forms, including, but not limited to, non-volatile media, volatile media and transmission media. Non-volatile media include, for example, optical, magnetic, and solid-state disks, such as a fixed disk. Volatile media include dynamic memory, such as system random-access memory (RAM). Transmission media include coaxial cables, copper wire and fiber optics, among others, including the wires that comprise one embodiment of a bus. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio frequency (RF) and infrared (IR) data communications. Common forms of computer-readable media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, a hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM disk, digital video disk (DVD), any other optical medium, any other physical medium with patterns of marks or holes, a RAM, a programmable read-only memory (PROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), an electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), a Flash memory, any other memory chip or data exchange adapter, a carrier wave, or any other medium from which a computer can read.
Various forms of computer-readable media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to a CPU for execution. A bus carries the data to system RAM, from which a CPU retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received by system RAM can optionally be stored on a fixed disk either before or after execution by a CPU.
Computer program code for carrying out operations for aspects of the present technology may be written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as JAVA, SMALLTALK, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of wired and/or wireless network, including a (wireless) local area network (LAN/WLAN) or a (wireless) wide area network (WAN/WWAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider, wireless Internet provider, and the like).
The corresponding structures, materials, acts, and equivalents of all means or step plus function elements in the claims below are intended to include any structure, material, or act for performing the function in combination with other claimed elements as specifically claimed. The description of the present technology has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Exemplary embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the present technology and its practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
Aspects of the present technology are described above with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable medium that can direct a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer readable medium produce an article of manufacture including instructions which implement the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other devices to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present technology. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of code, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
The description of the present technology has been presented for purposes of illustration and description, but is not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the invention in the form disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Exemplary embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the present technology and its practical application, and to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,890, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,918, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,893, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; United States Provisional Application No. 62/448,906, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,908, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,913, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,916, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,883, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,885, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,902, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,896, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/448,899, filed on Jan. 20, 2017; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/462,818, filed on Feb. 23, 2017, all the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5732390 | Katayanagi et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
6178435 | Schmookler | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6745220 | Hars | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6748412 | Ruehle | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6910059 | Lu et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7712143 | Comlekoglu | May 2010 | B2 |
7937270 | Smaragdis et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8515058 | Gentry | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8565435 | Gentry et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8781967 | Tehranchi et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8832465 | Gulati et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9059855 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9094378 | Yung et al. | Jul 2015 | B1 |
9189411 | Mckeen et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9215219 | Krendelev et al. | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9288039 | Monet et al. | Mar 2016 | B1 |
9491111 | Roth et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9503432 | El Emam et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9514317 | Martin et al. | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9565020 | Camenisch et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9577829 | Roth et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9652609 | Kang et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9846787 | Johnson et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9852306 | Cash et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9942032 | Kornaropoulos et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9946810 | Trepetin et al. | Apr 2018 | B1 |
9973334 | Hibshoosh et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10027486 | Liu | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10055602 | Deshpande et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10073981 | Arasu et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10075288 | Khedr et al. | Sep 2018 | B1 |
10129028 | Kamakari et al. | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10148438 | Evancich et al. | Dec 2018 | B2 |
10181049 | El Defrawy et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10210266 | Antonopoulos et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10235539 | Ito et al. | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10255454 | Kamara et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10333715 | Chu et al. | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10375042 | Chaum | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10396984 | French et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
10423806 | Cerezo Sanchez | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10489604 | Yoshino et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10496631 | Tschudin et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10644876 | Williams et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10693627 | Carr | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10721057 | Carr | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10728018 | Williams et al. | Jul 2020 | B2 |
10771237 | Williams et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10790960 | Williams et al. | Sep 2020 | B2 |
10817262 | Carr et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
20020032712 | Miyasaka et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020073316 | Collins et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020104002 | Nishizawa et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030037087 | Rarick | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030059041 | MacKenzie et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030110388 | Pavlin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040167952 | Gueron et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050008152 | MacKenzie | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050076024 | Takatsuka et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050259817 | Ramzan et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060008080 | Higashi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060008081 | Higashi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070053507 | Smaragdis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070095909 | Chaum | May 2007 | A1 |
20070140479 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143280 | Wang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20090037504 | Hussain | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090083546 | Staddon et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090193033 | Ramzan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090268908 | Bikel et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090279694 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090287837 | Felsher | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100202606 | Almeida | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100205430 | Chiou et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100241595 | Felsher | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110026781 | Osadchy et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110107105 | Hada | May 2011 | A1 |
20110110525 | Gentry | May 2011 | A1 |
20110243320 | Halevi et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110283099 | Nath et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120039469 | Mueller et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120054485 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120066510 | Weinman | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120201378 | Nabeel et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120265794 | Niel | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265797 | Niel | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130010950 | Kerschbaum | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130051551 | El Aimani | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054665 | Felch | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130114811 | Boufounos et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130148868 | Troncoso Pastoriza et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130170640 | Gentry | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130191650 | Balakrishnan et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130195267 | Alessio et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130198526 | Goto | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130216044 | Gentry et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130230168 | Takenouchi | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130237242 | Oka et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130246813 | Mori et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130326224 | Yavuz | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339722 | Krendelev et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130339751 | Sun et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346741 | Kim et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130346755 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140164758 | Ramamurthy et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140189811 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140233727 | Rohloff et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140281511 | Kaushik et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140355756 | Iwamura et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150100785 | Joye et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150100794 | Joye et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150205967 | Naedele et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150215123 | Kipnis et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150227930 | Quigley et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150229480 | Joye et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150244517 | Nita | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150248458 | Sakamoto | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150304736 | Lal et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150358152 | Ikarashi et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150358153 | Gentry | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160004874 | Ioannidis et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160036826 | Pogorelik et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160072623 | Joye et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160105402 | Kupwade-Patil et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160105414 | Bringer et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160119346 | Chen et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160140348 | Nawaz et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160179945 | Lastra Diaz et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160182222 | Rane et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160323098 | Bathen | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160335450 | Yoshino et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160344557 | Chabanne et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160350648 | Gilad-Bachrach et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170070340 | Hibshoosh et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170070351 | Yan | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170099133 | Gu et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170134158 | Pasol et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170185776 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170264426 | Joye et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20180091466 | Friedman et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180139054 | Chu et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180198601 | Laine et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180204284 | Cerezo Sanchez | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212752 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212753 | Williams | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212754 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212755 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212756 | Carr | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212757 | Carr | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212758 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212759 | Williams et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212775 | Williams | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180212933 | Williams | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180224882 | Carr | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180234254 | Camenisch et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180267981 | Sirdey et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180270046 | Carr | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180276417 | Cerezo Sanchez | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180343109 | Koseki et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180349632 | Bent et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180359097 | Lindell | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180373882 | Veugen | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190013950 | Becker et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190042786 | Williams et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190108350 | Bohli et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190158272 | Chopra et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190229887 | Ding et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190238311 | Zheng | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190251553 | Ma et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190251554 | Ma et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190253235 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190260585 | Kawai et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190280880 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190312728 | Poeppelmann | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190327078 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190334716 | Kocsis et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190349191 | Soriente et al. | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190371106 | Kaye | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200134200 | Williams et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200150930 | Carr et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200204341 | Williams et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200382274 | Williams et al. | Dec 2020 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2873186 | Mar 2018 | EP |
5680007 | Mar 2015 | JP |
101386294 | Apr 2014 | KR |
WO2014105160 | Jul 2014 | WO |
WO2015094261 | Jun 2015 | WO |
WO2016003833 | Jan 2016 | WO |
WO2016018502 | Feb 2016 | WO |
WO2018091084 | May 2018 | WO |
WO2018136801 | Jul 2018 | WO |
WO2018136804 | Jul 2018 | WO |
WO2018136811 | Jul 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Petition to Insitute Derivation Proceeding Pursuant to 35 USC 135; Case No. DER2019-00009, US Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board; Jul. 26, 2019, 272 pages. (2 PDFs). |
SCAMP Working Paper L29/11, “A Woods Hole Proposal Using Striping,” Dec. 2011, 14 pages. |
O'Hara, Michael James, “Shovel-ready Private Information Retrieval,” Dec. 2015, 4 pages. |
Carr, Benjamin et al., “Proposed Laughing Owl,” NSA Technical Report, Jan. 5, 2016, 18 pages. |
Williams, Ellison Anne et al., “Wideskies: Scalable Private Informaton Retrieval,” 14 pages. |
Carr, Benjamin et al., “A Private Stream Search Technique,” NSA Technical Report, Dec. 1, 2015, 18 pages. |
Drucker et al., “Paillier-encrypted databases with fast aggregated queries,” 2017 14th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), Jan. 8-11, 2017, pp. 848-853. |
Tu et al., “Processing Analytical Queries over Encrypted Data,” Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, vol. 6, Issue No. 5, Mar. 13, 2013. pp. 289-300. |
Boneh et al., “Private Database Queries Using Somewhat Homomorphic Encryption”, Cryptology ePrint Archive: Report 2013/422, Standford University [online], Jun. 27, 2013, [retrieved on Dec. 9, 2019], 22 pages. |
Chen et al., “Efficient Multi-Key Homomorphic Encryption with Packed Ciphertexts with Application to Oblivious Neural Network Inference”, CCS'19 Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, May 19, 2019. pp. 395-412. |
Armknecht et al., “A Guide to Fully Homomorphic Encryption” IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive: Report 2015/1192 [online], Dec. 14, 2015, 35 pages. |
Bayar et al., “A Deep Learning Approach to Universal Image Manipulation Detection Using a New Convolutional Layer”, IH&MMSec 2016, Jun. 20-22, 2016. pp. 5-10. |
Juvekar et al. “GAZELLE: A Low Latency Framework for Secure Neural Network Inference”, 27th USENIX Security Symposium, Aug. 15-17, 2018. pp. 1650-1668. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2018/014535, dated Apr. 19, 2018, 9 pages. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2018/014530, dated Apr. 23, 2018, 7 pages. |
“International Search Report” and “Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority,” Patent Cooperation Treaty Application No. PCT/US2018/014551, dated Apr. 24, 2018, 8 pages. |
Bösch et al., “SOFIR: Securely Outsourced Forensic Recognition,” 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), IEEE 978-1-4799-2893-4/14, 2014, pp. 2713-2717. |
Waziri et al., “Big Data Analytics and Data Security in the Cloud via Fullly Homomorphic Encryption,” World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Computer, Electrical, Automation, Control and Information Engineering, vol. 9, No. 3, 2015, pp. 744-753. |
Bajpai et al., “A Fully Homomorphic Encryption Implementation on Cloud Computing,” International Journal of Information & Computation Technology, ISSN 0974-2239 vol. 4, No. 8, 2014, pp. 811-816. |
Viejo et al., “Asymmetric homomorphisms for secure aggregation in heterogeneous scenarios,” Information Fusion 13, Elsevier B.V., Mar. 21, 2011, pp. 285-295. |
Patil et al, “Big Data Privacy Using Fully Homomorphic Non-Deterministic Encryption,” IEEE 7th International Advance Computing Conference, Jan. 5-7, 2017, 15 pages. |
Drucker et al., “Achieving trustworthy Homomorphic Encryption by combining it with a Trusted Execution Environment,” Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Application (JoWUA), Mar. 2018, pp. 86-99. |
Google Scholar, search results for “trusted execution environment database”, 2 pages, Aug. 1, 2020. |
Panda et al., “FPGA Prototype of Low Latency BBS PRNG,” IEEE International Symposium on Nanoelectronic and Information Systems, Dec. 2015, pp. 118-123, 7 pages. |
Sahu et al., “Implementation of Modular Multiplication for RSA Algorithm,” 2011 International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, 2011, pp. 112-114, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180212751 A1 | Jul 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62448890 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448918 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448893 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448906 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448908 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448913 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448916 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448883 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448885 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448902 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448896 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62448899 | Jan 2017 | US | |
62462818 | Feb 2017 | US |