The present invention relates to a mounting structure of a head cover on a barrel-type apparatus used for a casing of a turbo machine or the like or a pressure vessel, to a vessel or a casing having the mounting structure, and also a centrifugal compressor housed in the casing.
As a structure to fix a head cover of a centrifugal compressor, a bolted structure as shown in FIG. 1 of JP Published Patent Application No. 55-125398 A (1980) is most frequently used. In the bolted structure, however, it is necessary to increase the number of bolts as the pressure inside a casing increases. Thus, there is a problem that assembling and disassembling operations become complicated and the bolted structure increases in cost.
To solve the problem, a shear key structure as shown in FIG. 5 of JP Examined Patent Application Publication No. 49-37932 B (1974) or the like is used in the high-pressure casing. In the structure, a shear key having a smaller inner diameter than that of a groove provided in a casing is mounted on the groove, and a head cover is thereby fixed to the casing. Some improvements of the shear key structure have been proposed.
According to FIG. 3 of JP Published Patent Application No. 55-125398 A (1980), a ring-shaped stopper for radially fixing the shear key is provided on the inner diameter side of the shear key, to thereby restrict the rotation of the shear key. Meanwhile, according to FIG. 6 of JP Published Patent Application No. 55-125398 A (1980), the shear key is provided with a shoulder, in addition to the ring-shaped stopper structure, and the outer diameter of the shoulder is brought into contact with the inner diameter of the casing, to thereby reduce a force applied to the shear key.
According to FIG. 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 3,934,752, the shear key is axially segmented into two members, with respect to the shear key structure shown in FIG. 5 of JP Examined Patent Application Publication No. 49-37932 B (1974). According to FIG. 3 of JP Examined Patent Application Publication No. 49-37932 B (1974), instead of a shoulder of the head cover in the structure shown in FIG. 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 3,934,752, the shear key is segmented into two members and its axially inner side member is provided with a shoulder. According to FIG. 1 of JP Published Patent Application No. 48-21804 A (1973), an axially outer side one of the shear key members segmented into two is also provided with a shoulder, the outer diameter of the shoulder is disposed in contact with the inner diameter of the casing, and the two shear keys are fixed by using bolts.
As described above, the bolted structure has been most frequently used as a closure structure for a barrel-type casing of a turbo machine such as a centrifugal compressor. However, as the pressure increases, it is necessary to increase the number of bolts, causing trouble that assembling and disassembling operations become complicated, resulting in cost increase.
To solve the problem, the shear key has been conventionally used in the high-pressure casing. In the shear key structure as shown in FIG. 5 of JP Examined Patent Application Publication No. 49-37932 B (1974), axial load due to an internal pressure and also a force from the casing that supports the axial load act on the cross-sectional center of gravity of the shear key with a distance vertically away from the rotating axis, and thus generate a rotation moment on the shear key. The shear key rotates due to the moment, and stops by unevenly contacting the casing at two points. Such unevenly contacting produces a locally high surface pressure that causes a problem that the casing, the shear key and the head cover are subject to plastic deform.
To solve the problem, the shear key structure of a moment balancing method has been known. An example of the moment balancing shear key structure includes the structure provided with a ring-shaped stopper as shown in FIGS. 3 and 6 of JP Published Patent Application No. 55-125398 A (1980). The structure, however, has a problem that the end surface of the head cover reduces in area and has difficulties in ensuring an area large enough to mount a flange for introducing a fluid that is required for a bearing, a shaft seal or the like.
According to the shear key structure as shown in FIG. 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 3,934,752, FIG. 3 of JP Examined Patent Application Publication No. 49-37932 B (1974) and FIG. 1 of JP Published Patent Application No. 48-21804 A (1973), it is possible to ensure large area for the end surface of the head cover. However, according FIG. 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 3,934,752, a load is concentrated to the axially inner side member of the shear key, so that the member has increased dimensions, and the groove provided in the casing is extended, causing problem that the entire casing is extended.
According to the shear key structure as shown in FIG. 3 of JP Examined Patent Application Publication No. 49-37932 B (1974), and FIG. 1 of JP Published Patent Application No. 48-21804 A (1973), the axially inner side member of the shear key is provided with a shoulder to thereby reduce the load on the member. However, since the structure of the axially inner side member of the shear key becomes complicated, the machining thereof also becomes complicated, and higher machining accuracy is required. In addition, a bending stress occurs on the shoulder, so that the shoulder may be deformed or destroyed. Thus, there is a problem that the shoulder needs to be carefully designed.
According to the shear key structure as shown in FIG. 1 of JP Published Patent Application No. 48-21804 A (1973), the axially outer side member of the shear key segmented into two members is also provided with a shoulder, to thereby reduce the load applied to the axially inner side shear key member. However, as a shear force is applied to the bolt that fastens the axially segmented shear key members, the bolt may be broken and the load share between the segmented shear key members is not clear. Thus, there presents a problem that the shear key structure has to be designed on the safe side, with the result that the casing increases in size.
The present invention has been made to solve the aforementioned problems of the conventional art.
In order to solve the aforementioned problems, a pressure vessel according to the present invention comprises a casing, a head cover mounted on the casing, and a shear key arranged between the casing and the head cover, wherein an inner surface of the casing is provided with a circumferentially extending groove, a plurality of shear key members are axially and circumferentially disposed in the groove to prevent the head cover from moving axially outward, and the plurality of shear key members are individually fixed to the casing only in a radial direction, so as to allow the shear key members to be displaced from each other in the radial direction.
Another pressure vessel according to the present invention comprises a casing, a head cover mounted on the casing, and shear keys arranged between the casing and the head cover, wherein a shoulder is formed on the axially outer side of an outer circumferential surface of the head cover; an inner surface of the casing is provided with a circumferentially extending groove; a first shear key member is disposed in the groove and the shoulder, such that at least a portion of an outer circumferential surface of the first shear key member is in contact with an inner circumferential surface of the groove; a second shear key member is disposed adjacent to the first shear key member in the groove, the second shear key member having an axially projecting shoulder, a radially outer circumferential surface thereof being in contact with an inner circumferential surface of the casing; and each of the first and second shear key members is circumferentially segmented into three or more members, each of the members being radially fixed to the casing but not axially fastened to each other, so as to allow radially slight displacement between the first and the second shear key members by a shear force acting therebetween.
According to the present invention, the shear key structure can be designed small. Particularly, the high-pressure casing can be downsized.
In the following, embodiments will be described with reference to the drawings.
First, a centrifugal compressor will be described based on
A second key member 5b is also arranged in the groove 4 formed in the inner surface of the barrel-type casing 1 so as to be in contact with the first key member 5a. The outer diameter of the second key member 5b is smaller than the diameter of the circumferential surface of the groove 4, and is larger than the inner diameter of the casing 1. The inner diameter of the second key member 5b is equal to the diameter of the shoulder 6 of the head cover 2. The second key member 5b is segmented into three or more members in the circumferential direction, and has a shoulder 13 having an L shape in section along the axis. The outer diameter of the shoulder 13 is equal to the inner diameter of the casing 1.
The second key member 5b is disposed adjacent to the axially outer side of the first key member 5a in the groove 4 formed in the inner surface of the barrel-type casing 1. At this point, the first and second key members 5a and 5b are not fastened to each other in the axial direction, but are fixed to the casing 1 using bolts 41 and 42. The outer diameter of the shoulder 13 is thereby in contact with the inner circumferential surface of the casing 1.
According to the embodiment shown in
The groove 4 of the casing 1 includes a joggled groove 40 having a larger diameter at a position where the second key member 5b having an L shape in section is arranged than that of a portion of the groove 4 where the first key member 5a is mounted in contact with the head cover.
In the shear key structure shown in
According to a shear key structure shown in FIG. 3 of JP Examined Patent Application Publication No. 49-37932 B (1974), and FIG. 1 of JP Published Patent Application No. 48-21804 A (1973), a shoulder is provided in a member corresponding to the member 5a in the Embodiment 1 shown in
In the shear key structure shown in
When an internal pressure is applied to the casing 1 and the head cover 2, a compressive surface pressure is applied to a contact surface between the first and second key members 5a and 5b by a force F1 from the head cover 1 and an equivalent force F2 from the casing 1. Meanwhile, a clockwise moment is generated on the first key member 5a as shown in
F1=F2 (1)
F3=F4+F5 (2)
F1R1+F2R2=F3L3+F4L4+F5L5 (3)
Meanwhile, a force shown in
F2Ra−F2Rb−F5La−F5Lb=0 (4)
At this point, a force F5 applied to the shoulder 13 of the second key member 5b is equal to or less than a stiction acting between the first and second key members 5a and 5b. When a coefficient of friction between the first and second key members 5a and 5b is represented by μ, the stiction acting between both the members is represented by μF1. When the stiction μF1 is large and no slip occurs between the first and second key members 5a and 5b, the force F4 generated on the circumferential surface of the groove 4 of the casing 1 (the radial contact surface) becomes 0.
According to the conventional shear key structure shown in FIG. 1 of JP Published Patent Application No. 48-21804 A (1973), members corresponding to the first and second key members 5a and 5b in the Embodiment 1 shown in
In the Embodiment 1, the structure that the first and second key members 5a and 5b are not axially fixed, but are radially fixed to the casing 1 using the bolts 41 and 42 is employed. Accordingly, the slip between both the members is tolerated. The force F5 applied to the shoulder 13 of the second key member 5b is calculated by the next expression from the coefficient of friction μ between the first and second key members 5a and 5b.
F5=μF1 (5)
The load on each portion can be obtained from the dimensions of each portion by using the aforementioned expressions (1) to (5). Accordingly, the first and second key members 5a and 5b can be designed appropriately with respect to the load, so that the first and second key members 5a and 5b can be reduced in size, and resultantly, the groove 4 and the casing 1 can be also reduced in size.
In the shear key structure according to the Embodiment 1, it is necessary to bring the outer diameter of the first key member 5a into contact with the groove 4 of the casing 1, but not to bring the outer diameter of the second key member 5b into contact with the groove 4 of the casing 1. To this end, the joggled groove 40 may be formed by increasing the groove depth at the position where the second key member 5b is arranged. Since the load F2 in the shear key structure is very large, a large contact area is required between the second key member 5b and the axial end surface of the groove 4. Since a large contact area is also required between the first and second key members 5a and 5b, the outer diameters of both the members are preferably equal to each other. Therefore, the groove of the casing 1 preferably includes the joggled groove 40.
As described above, the bolts are used to fix the first and second key members 5a and 5b to the casing 1 in both the Embodiments 1 and 2. However, the fixing means is not limited to the bolt, and another fixing means may be appropriately employed.
The present invention can be widely applied to a cover mounting structure of not only a turbo machine such as a centrifugal compressor, but also various pressure vessels and casings.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2009-103744 | Apr 2009 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2196895 | Bowman | Apr 1940 | A |
3437230 | Savory | Apr 1969 | A |
3552789 | Evans | Jan 1971 | A |
3695482 | Smith | Oct 1972 | A |
3934752 | Ravicchio et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
4380405 | Kaneki et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
4565297 | Korner et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4595038 | Wege | Jun 1986 | A |
5429268 | Hale et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5908134 | Hale et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
20070175904 | Meindl et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090324404 | Maier et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100181325 | Jenkins et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 314 147 | Apr 1973 | GB |
48-21804 | Mar 1973 | JP |
49-37932 | Oct 1974 | JP |
53-136465 | Oct 1978 | JP |
55-125398 | Sep 1980 | JP |
56-17399 | Feb 1981 | JP |
56-104199 | Aug 1981 | JP |
58-079700 | May 1983 | JP |
58-149465 | Sep 1983 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Ebara Catalog, Compressors, Japan, 1996, pp. 12-13. |
GE Oil & Gas, Centrifugal & Axial Compressors, Nov. 2005, pp. 3-27. |
Notice of Reasons for rejection of JP Appln. No. 2009-103744 dated Mar. 12, 2013 in English. |
Notice of Reasons for rejection of JP Appln. No. 2009-103744 dated Mar. 12, 2012 in English. |
JP Office Action of Appln. No. 2009-103744 dated Mar. 12, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100270308 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |