Endoluminal device exhibiting improved endothelialization and method of manufacture thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6820676
  • Patent Number
    6,820,676
  • Date Filed
    Friday, December 22, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 23, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
An implantable endoluminal device which is fabricated from materials which present a blood or body fluid and tissue contact surface which has controlled heterogeneities in material constitution. An endoluminal stent which is made of a material having controlled heterogeneities in the stent material along the blood flow surface of the stent and the method of fabricating the stent using vacuum deposition methods.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates generally to implantable endoluminal medical devices which contact biological fluids and tissues on at least one surface of the medical device. More particularly, the present invention relates to endoluminal stents which are implanted into anatomical passageways using minimally invasive techniques. Endoluminal stents are frequently used post-angioplasty in order to provide a structural support for a blood vessel and reduce the incidence of restenosis following percutaneous balloon angioplasty. A principal example of the present invention are endovascular stents which are introduced to a site of disease or trauma within the body's vasculature from an introductory location remote from the disease or trauma site using an introductory catheter, passed through the vasculature communicating between the remote introductory location and the disease or trauma site, and released from the introductory catheter at the disease or trauma site to maintain patentency of the blood vessel at the site of disease or trauma.




While the use of endoluminal stents has successfully decreased the rate of restenosis in angioplasty patients, it has been found that a significant restenosis rate continues to exist even with the use of endoluminal stents. It is generally believed that the post-stenting restenosis rate is due, in major part, to a failure of the endothelial layer to regrow over the stent and the incidence of smooth muscle cell-related neo-intimal growth on the luminal surfaces of the stent. Injury to the endothelium, the natural nonthrombogenic lining of the arterial lumen, is a significant factor contributing to restonisis at the situs of a stent. Endothelial loss exposes thrombogenic arterial wall proteins, which, along with the generally thrombogenic nature of many prosthetic materials, such as stainless steel, titanium, tantalum, Nitinol, etc. customarily used in manufacturing stents, initiates platelet deposition and activation of the coagulation cascade, which results in thrombus formation, ranging from partial covering of the luminal surface of the stent to an occlusive thrombus. Additionally, endothelial loss at the site of the stent has been implicated in the development of neointimal hyperplasia at the stent situs. Accordingly, rapid re-endothelialization of the arterial wall with concomitant endothelialization of the body fluid or blood contacting surfaces of the implanted device, is considered critical for maintaining vasculature patency and preventing low-flow thrombosis.




At present, most endoluminal stents are manufactured of stainless steel, which is known to be thrombogenic. In order to reduce the thrombogenicity of the stainless steel and to maintain sufficient dimensional profiles for catheter delivery, most stents minimize the metal surface area which contacts blood, in order to minimize thrombus formation after implantation. Thus, in order to reduce the thrombogenic response to stent implantation, as well as reduce the formation of neointimal hyperplasia, it would be advantageous to increase the rate at which endothelial cells from endothelium proximal and distal to the stent situs, migrate onto and the endothelial coverage of the luminal surface of the stent which is in contact with blood flow through the vasculature.




The surface of a solid, homogeneous material can be conceptualized as having unsaturated inter-atomic and intermolecular bonds forming a reactive plane ready to interact with the environment. In practice, a perfectly clean surface is unattainable because of immediate adsorption of airborne species, upon exposure to ambient air, of O, O


2


, CO


2


, SO


2


, NO, hydrocarbons and other more complex reactive molecules. Reaction with oxygen implies the formation of oxides on a metal surface, a self-limiting process, known as passivation. An oxidized surface is also reactive with air, by adsorbing simple, organic airborne compounds. Assuming the existence of bulk material of homogeneous subsurface and surface composition, oxygen and hydrocarbons may adsorb homogeneously. Therefore, further exposure to another environment, such as the vascular compartment, may be followed by a uniform biological response.




Current metallic vascular devices, such as stents, are made from bulk metals made by conventional methods, and stent precursors, such as hypotubes, are made with many steps each of which introduce processing aides to the metals. For example, olefins trapped by cold drawing and transformed into carbides or elemental carbon deposit by heat treatment, typically yield large carbon rich areas in 316L stainless steel tubing manufactured by cold drawing process. The conventional stents have marked surface and subsurface heterogeneity resulting from manufacturing processes (friction material transfer from tooling, inclusion of lubricants, chemical segregation from heat treatments). This results in formation of surface and subsurface inclusions with chemical composition and, therefore, reactivity different from the bulk material. Oxidation, organic contamination, water and electrolytic interaction, protein adsorption and cellular interaction may, therefore, be altered on the surface of such inclusion spots. Unpredictable distribution of inclusions such as those mentioned above provide an unpredictable and uncontrolled heterogeneous surface available for interaction with plasma proteins and cells. Specifically, these inclusions interrupt the regular distribution pattern of surface free energy and electrostatic charges on the metal surface that determine the nature and extent of plasma protein interaction. Plasma proteins deposit nonspecifically on surfaces according to their relative affinity for polar or non-polar areas and their concentration in blood. A replacement process known as the Vroman effect, Vroman L.


The importance of surfaces in contact phase reactions, Seminars of Thrombosis and Hemostasis


1987;13(1):79-85, determines a time-dependent sequential replacement of predominant proteins at an artificial surface, starting with albumin, following with IgG, fibrinogen and ending with high molecular weigh kininogen. Despite this variability, some of the adsorbed proteins have receptors available for cell attachment and therefore constitute adhesive sites. Examples are: fibrinogen glycoprotein receptor IIbIIIa for platelets and fibronectin RGD sequence for many blood activated cells. Since the coverage of an artificial surface with endothelial cells is a favorable end-point in the healing process, to favor endothelialization is desirable in implantable vascular device manufacture.




Normally, endothelial cells (EC) migrate and proliferate to cover denuded areas until confluence is achieved. Migration, quantitatively more important than proliferation, proceeds under normal blood flow roughly at a rate of 25 μm/hr or 2.5 times the diameter of an EC, which is nominally 10 μm. EC migrate by a rolling motion of the cell membrane, coordinated by a complex system of intracellular filaments attached to clusters of cell membrane attachment, integrin receptors, specifically focal contact points. The integrins within the focal contact sites are expressed according to complex signaling mechanisms and eventually couple to specific amino acid sequences in substrate adhesion molecules (such as RGD, mentioned above). An EC has roughly 16-22% of its cell surface represented by integrin clusters Davies P. F., Robotewskyi A., Griem M. L.


Endothelial cell adhesion in real time. J. Clin. Invest


. 1993;91:2640-2652, Davies, P. F., Robotewski, A., Griem, M. L.,


Qualitiative studies of endothelial cell adhesion, J. Clin. Invest


. 1994;93:2031-2038. This is a dynamic process, which implies more than 50% remodeling in 30 minutes. The focal adhesion contacts vary in size and distribution, but 80% of them measure less than 6 μm


2


, with the majority of them being about 1 μm


2


, and tend to elongate in the direction of flow and concentrate at leading edges of the cell. Although the process of recognition and signaling to determine specific attachment receptor response to attachment sites is incompletely understood, regular availability of attachment sites, more likely than not, would favorably influence attachment and migration. Irregular or unpredictable distribution of attachment sites, that might occur as a result of various inclusions, with spacing equal or smaller to one whole cell length, is likely to determine alternating hostile and favorable attachment conditions along the path of a migrating cell. These conditions may vary from optimal attachment force and migration speed to insufficient holding strength to sustain attachment, resulting in cell slough under arterial flow conditions. Due to present manufacturing processes, current implantable vascular devices exhibit such variability in surface composition as determined by surface sensitive techniques such as atomic force microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and time of flight secondary ion-mass spectroscopy.




There have been numerous attempts to increase endothelialization of implanted stents, including covering the stent with a polymeric material (U.S. Pat. No. 5,897,911), imparting a diamond-like carbon coating onto the stent (U.S. Pat. No. 5,725,573), covalently binding hydrophobic moieties to a heparin molecule (U.S. Pat. No. 5,955,588), coating a stent with a layer of blue to black zirconium oxide or zirconium nitride (U.S. Pat. No. 5,649,951), coating a stent with a layer of turbostratic carbon (U.S. Pat. No. 5,387,247), coating the tissue-contacting surface of a stent with a thin layer of a Group VB metal (U.S. Pat. No. 5,607,463), imparting a porous coating of titanium or of a titanium alloy, such as Ti—Nb—Zr alloy, onto the surface of a stent (U.S. Pat. No. 5,690,670), coating the stent, under ultrasonic conditions, with a synthetic or biological, active or inactive agent, such as heparin, endothelium derived growth factor, vascular growth factors, silicone, polyurethane, or polytetrafluoroethylene, U.S. Pat. No. 5,891,507), coating a stent with a silane compound with vinyl functionality, then forming a graft polymer by polymerization with the vinyl groups of the silane compound (U.S. Pat. No. 5,782,908), grafting monomers, oligomers or polymers onto the surface of a stent using infrared radiation, microwave radiation or high voltage polymerization to impart the property of the monomer, oligomer or polymer to the stent (U.S. Pat. No. 5,932,299). Thus, the problems of thrombogenicity and re-endothelialization associated with stents have been addressed by the art in various manners which cover the stent with either a biologically active or an inactive covering which is less thrombogenic than the stent material and/or which has an increase capacity for promoting re-endothelialization of the stent situs. These solutions, however, all require the use of existing stents as substrates for surface derivatization or modification, and each of the solutions result in a biased or laminate structure built upon the stent substrate. These prior art coated stents are susceptible to delamination and/or cracking of the coating when mechanical stresses of transluminal catheter delivery and/or radial expansion in vivo. Moreover, because these prior art stents employ coatings applied to stents fabricated in accordance with conventional stent formation techniques, e.g., cold-forming metals, the underlying stent substrate is characterized by uncontrolled heterogeneities on the surface thereof. Thus, coatings merely are laid upon the heterogeneous stent surface, and inherently conform to the heterogeneities in the stent surface and mirror these heterogeneities at the blood contact surface of the resulting coating. This is conceptually similar to adding a coat of fresh paint over an old coating of blistered paint, the fresh coating will conform to the blistering and eventually, itself, blister and delaminate from the underlying substrate.




The current invention entails creating materials specifically designed for manufacture of stents and other intravascular devices. Manufacture of stents and other intravascular devices is controlled to attain a regular, homogeneous atomic and molecular pattern of distribution along their surface. This avoids the marked variations in surface composition, would create a predictable oxidation and organic adsorption pattern and would have a predictable interaction with water, electrolytes, proteins and cells. Particularly, EC migration would be supported by a homogeneous distribution of binding domains which serve as natural or implanted cell attachment sites, in order to promote unimpeded migration and attachment. Based on observed EC attachment mechanisms such binding domains should have a repeating pattern along the blood contact surface of no less than 1 μm radius and 2 μm border to border spacing between binding domains. Ideally, the inter-binding domain spacing is less than the nominal diameter of an endothelial cell in order to ensure that at any given time, a portion of an endothelial cell is in proximity to a binding domain.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with the present invention, there is provided an implantable endoluminal device which is fabricated from materials which present a blood contact surface which is substantially homogeneous in material constitution. More particularly, the present invention provides an endoluminal stent which is made of a material having controlled heterogeneities along the blood flow surface of the stent. The heterogeneities which are controlled in the present invention include: grain size, grain phase, grain material composition, stent-material composition, and surface topography at the blood flow surface of the stent. Additionally, the present invention provides methods of making an endoluminal stent having controlled heterogeneities in the stent material along the blood flow surface of the stent.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES





FIG. 1

is a diagrammatic representation of controlled heterogeneities in the inventive stent.





FIG. 2

is a micrograph of uncontrolled heterogeneities present in prior art stent material.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Blood protein interaction with surfaces of endoluminal devices appears to be an initial step in a chain of events leading to tissue incorporation of the endovascular device. The present invention is based, in part, upon the relationship between surface energy of the material used to make the endoluminal device and protein adsorption at the surface of the endoluminal device. The present inventors have found that a relationship exists between surface free energy and protein adsorption on metals commonly used in fabrication of endoluminal devices. In addition, specific electrostatic forces resident on the surface of metal endoluminal stents have been found to influence blood interactions with the stent surface and the vascular wall.




In accordance with the present invention there is provided a stent which is fabricated of a material having substantially homogeneous surface properties, specifically surface energy and electrostatic charge, across the blood contact surface of the stent. Current manufacturing methods for fabricating endoluminal stents fail to achieve the desired material properties of the present invention. As discussed above, stents are fabricated from bulk metals which are processed in a manner which introduces processing aides to the metal. Presently, stents are made from hypotubes formed from the bulk metals, by machining a series of slots or patterns into the hyptotube to accommodate radial expansion into a stainless steel metal tube, or by weaving wires into a mesh pattern. According to the present invention, a stent with a substantially homogeneous metal constitution, exhibiting substantially homogeneous surface properties is made by imparting a stent pattern, suitable for making either a balloon expandable or self expanding stent, onto a substrate and depositing stent-forming metal onto the stent pattern by a deposition methodology which yields a metal having controlled heterogeneities. Suitable deposition methodologies, as are known in the microelectronic and vacuum coating fabrication arts and incorporated herein by reference, are plasma deposition and physical vapor deposition which are utilized to impart a metal layer onto the stent pattern.




The present invention consists of a stent made of a bulk material having controlled heterogeneities on the luminal surface thereof. Heterogeneities are controlled by fabricating the bulk material of the stent to have defined grain sizes which yield areas or sites along the surface of the stent having optimal protein binding capability. The characteristically desirable properties of the inventive stent are: (a) optimum mechanical properties consistent with or exceeding regulatory approval criteria, (b) minimization of defects, such as cracking or pin hole defects, (c) a fatigue life of 400 MM cycles as measured by simulated accelerated testing, (d) corrosion resistance, (e) biocompatibility without having biologically significant impurities in the material, (f) a substantially non-frictional abluminal surface to facilitate atraumatic vascular crossing and tracking and compatible with transcatheter techniques for stent introduction, (g) radiopaque at selected sites and MRI compatible, (h) have an luminal surface which is optimized for surface energy and microtopography, (i) minimal manufacturing and material cost consistent with achieving the desired material properties, and (j) high process yields.




In accordance with the present invention, the foregoing properties are achieved by fabricating a stent by the same metal deposition methodologies as are used and standard in the microelectronics and nano-fabrication vacuum coating arts, and which are hereby incorporated by reference. In accordance with the present invention, the preferred deposition methodologies include ion-beam assisted evaporative deposition and sputtering techniques. In ion beam-assisted evaporative deposition it is preferable to employ dual and simultaneous thermal electron beam evaporation with simultaneous ion bombardment of the substrate using an inert gas, such as argon, xenon, nitrogen or neon. Bombardment with an inert gas, such as argon ions serves to reduce void content by increasing the atomic packing density in the deposited material during deposition. The reduced void content in the deposited material allows the mechanical properties of that deposited material to be similar to the bulk material properties. Deposition rates up to 20 nm/sec are achievable using ion beam-assisted evaporative deposition techniques.




When sputtering techniques are employed, a 200 micron thick stainless steel film may be deposited within about four hours of deposition time. With the sputtering technique, it is preferable to employ a cylindrical sputtering target, a single circumferential source which concentrically surrounds the substrate which is held in a coaxial position within the source. Alternate deposition processes which may be employed to form the stent in accordance with the present invention are cathodic arc, laser ablation, and direct ion beam deposition. When employing vacuum deposition methodologies, the crystalline structure of the deposited film affects the mechanical properties of the deposited film. These mechanical properties of the deposited film may be modified by post-process treatment, such as by, for example, annealing, high pressure treatment or gas quenching.




Materials to make the inventive stents are chosen for their biocompatibility, mechanical properties, i.e., tensile strength, yield strength, and their ease of deposition include the following: elemental titanium, vanadium, aluminum, nickel, tantalum, zirconium, chromium, silver, gold, silicon, magnesium, neobium, scandium, platinum, cobalt, palladium, manganese, molybdenum and alloys thereof, such as zirconium-titanium-tantalum alloys, nitinol, and stainless steel.




During deposition, the chamber pressure, the deposition pressure and the partial pressure of the process gases are controlled to optimize deposition of the desired species onto the substrate. As is known in the microelectronic fabrication, nano-fabrication and vacuum coating arts, both the reactive and non-reactive gases are controlled and the inert or non-reactive gaseous species introduced into the deposition chamber are typically argon and nitrogen. The substrate may be either stationary or moveable, either rotated about its longitudinal axis, or moved in an X-Y plane within the reactor to facilitate deposition or patterning of the deposited material onto the substrate. The deposited material maybe deposited either as a uniform solid film onto the substrate, or patterned by (a) imparting either a positive or negative pattern onto the substrate, such as by etching or photolithography techniques applied to the substrate surface to create a positive or negative image of the desired pattern or (b) using a mask or set of masks which are either stationary or moveable relative to the substrate to define the pattern applied to the substrate. Patterning may be employed to achieve complex finished geometries of the resultant stent, both in the context of spatial orientation of the pattern as well as the material thickness at different regions of the deposited film, such as by varying the wall thickness of the material over its length to thicken sections at proximal and distal ends of the stent to prevent flaring of the stent ends upon radial expansion of the stent.




The stent may be removed from the substrate after stent formation by any of a variety of methods. For example, the substrate may be removed by chemical means, such as etching or dissolution, by ablation, by machining or by ultrasonic energy. Alternatively, a sacrificial layer of a material, such as carbon or aluminum, may be deposited intermediate the substrate and the stent and the sacrificial layer removed by melting, chemical means, ablation, machining or other suitable means to free the stent from the substrate.




The resulting stent may then be subjected to post-deposition processing to modify the crystalline structure, such as by annealing, or to modify the surface topography, such as by etching to affect and control the heterogeneities on the blood flow surface of the stent.




EXAMPLE 1




Stent Formation by Sputtering




A ceramic cylindrical substrate is introduced into a deposition chamber with capabilities of glow discharge substrate cleaning and sputter deposition of carbon and stainless steel. The deposition chamber is evacuated to a pressure less than or equal to 2×10


−7


Torr. Pre-cleaning of the substrate is conducted under vacuum by glow discharge. The substrate temperature is controlled to achieve a temperature between about 300 and 1100 degrees Centigrade. A bias voltage between −1000 and +1000 volts is applied to the substrate sufficient to cause energetic species arriving at the surface of the substrate to have a hyperthermal energy between 0.1 eV and about 700 eV, preferably between 5-50 eV. The deposition sources are circumferential and are oriented to deposit from the target circumferentially about the substrate.




During deposition, the deposition pressure is maintained between 0.1 and 10 mTorr. A sacrificial carbon layer of substantially uniform thickness (±5%) between 10 and 500 Angstroms is deposited circumferentially on the substrate. After depositing the carbon layer, a cylindrical film of stainless steel is deposited onto the sacrificial carbon layer on the cylindrical substrate at a deposition rate between about 10 to 100 microns/hour. After formation of the stainless steel film, the substrate is removed from the deposition chamber and heated to volatilize the intermediate sacrificial carbon layer between the substrate and the film. After removing the carbon intermediate layer, the stainless steel film is removed from the substrate and exhibits material properties similar to the bulk stainless steel target and surface properties characterized by controlled heterogeneities in grain size, material composition and surface topography. A series of patterns are then machined into the resultant stainless steel film to form a stent by electrical discharge machining (EDM) or laser cutting the film.




EXAMPLE 2




Stent Formation by Sputtering




The same operating conditions are followed as in Example 1, except that the substrate is tubular and selected to have a coefficient of thermal expansion different than that of the resultant stent. No intermediate layer of sacrificial carbon is deposited onto the substrate, and the outer surface of the substrate is etched with a pattern of recesses defining a desired stent pattern. The substrate is mounted onto a rotational jig within the deposition chamber and rotated at a uniform rate during deposition. Tantalum is used as the target material and deposited into the recesses of the substrate from a single stationary source. After deposition, the temperature of the substrate and the deposited stent are controlled to impart diametric differential in the substrate and stent and permit removal of the stent from the substrate.




EXAMPLE 3




Stent Formation by Ion Beam-assisted Evaporative Deposition




A cylindrical substrate is introduced into a deposition chamber which has capabilities of: substrate rotation and precise positioning, glow discharge substrate cleaning, ion beam-assisted evaporative deposition, and cylindrical magnetron sputtering. The deposition sources are (a) dual electron beam evaporative sources placed adjacent one another at the base of the deposition chamber at a fixed distance from the substrate, these are used with simultaneous argon ion impingement onto the substrate from a controlled ion beam source, and (b) a cylindrical magnetron sputtering source with a carbon target capable of circumferentially coating a carbon sacrificial layer of substantially uniform thickness of between 10 and 200 Angstroms onto the substrate.




The substrate temperature is controlled to achieve a substrate temperature between about 300 and 1100 degrees Centigrade. The deposition chamber is evacuated to a pressure less than or equal to 2×10


−7


Torr. A pre-cleaning of the substrate is conducted under vacuum by glow discharge. The substrate is rotated to ensure uniform cleaning and subsequent uniform deposition thickness. After cleaning the substrate is moved into the magnetron and coated with the carbon layer. The substrate is then moved into position to receive the stent-forming metal coating with simultaneous ion bombardment. One electron beam evaporation source contains titanium while the other source contains nickel. The evaporation rates of each of the titanium and nickel evaporation sources are separately controlled to form a nitinol alloy on the substrate as the stent-forming metal.




EXAMPLE 4




Planar Deposition of Stent




The same operating conditions of Example 3 are followed, except that a planar substrate is used. The deposition source is a single electron beam evaporation source containing platinum and is used with simultaneous argon ion impingement onto the substrate from a controlled ion beam source.




The substrate temperature is controlled to achieve a substrate temperature between about 300 and 1100 degrees Centigrade. The deposition chamber is evacuated to a pressure less than or equal to 2×10


−7


Torr. A pre-cleaning of the substrate is conducted under vacuum by glow discharge. After cleaning the substrate is moved into position within the deposition chamber and coated with platinum from the electron beam evaporation source with simultaneous argon ion bombardment, with the electron beam evaporation source passing platinum through a pattern mask corresponding to a stent pattern which is interposed between the source and the substrate to pass a pattern of platinum onto the substrate.




After deposition, the patterned stent is removed from the substrate and rolled about a forming substrate to a cylindrical shape and opposing ends of the planar stent material are brought into juxtaposition with one another and may be attached by laser welding or left uncoupled.




While the invention has been described with reference to its preferred embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the relevant arts will understand and appreciate that the present invention is not limited to the recited preferred embodiments, but that various modifications in material selection, deposition methodology, manner of controlling the material heterogeneities of the deposited stent material, and deposition process parameters may be employed without departing from the invention, which is to be limited only by the claims appended hereto.



Claims
  • 1. A method of manufacturing an implantable endoluminal device capable of radially expanding from a first diameter to a second diameter comprising the steps of:a. vacuum depositing a device-forming metal onto an unpatterned, exterior surface of a generally cylindrical substrate at a deposition rate that controls a formation of heterogeneities in the metal to form a generally tubular, unpatterned, substantially homogeneous metal film on the exterior surface of the substrate; b. forming a pattern of openings through the deposited generally tubular, unpatterned, substantially homogeneous metal film to form the implantable endolumina) device, whereby the pattern of openings provide a plurality of geometric deformation regions that permit radial expansion of the implantable endoluntinal device; and c. removing the iniplantable endoiwninal device from the substrate.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, further comprises the step of depositing a sacrificial material layer onto the substrate prior to step (a) and removing the sacrificial material layer in order to remove the implantable endoluminal device from the substrate in step (c).
  • 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein step (a) is conducted by ion beam-assisted evaporative deposition.
  • 4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the ion beam-assisted evaporative deposition is conducted in the presence of an inert gas.
  • 5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the inert gas is selected from the group consisting of argon, xenon, nitrogen and neon.
  • 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein step (a) is conducted by sputtering.
  • 7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the deposition rate is at least about 20 nm/sec.
  • 8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the deposition rate is between about 10-100 microns/hour.
  • 9. The method according to claim 1, wherein during the deposition of the device-forming metal, a deposition chamber pressure is less than about 2×10−7 torr.
  • 10. The method according to claim 1, wherein during the deposition of the device-forming metal, the substrate is rotated.
  • 11. The method according to claim 1, wherein during the deposition of the device-forming metal, a substrate temperature is between about 300 and 1100° C.
  • 12. A method of making an implantable medical device comprising the steps of:a. providing a substrate having a shaped exterior surface capable of accommodating metal deposition thereupon; b. vacuum depositing a biocompatible material onto the shaped exterior surface of the substrate at a deposition rate, with a substrate temperature, and at a deposition chamber pressure that controls a formation of heterogeneities on a surface of a biocompatible material layer; and c. forming the implantable medical device from the, deposited biocompatible material, wherein the deposition rate is at least about 20 nm/sec. the deposition chamber pressure is less than about 2×10−7 torr, and the substrate temperature is between about 300 and 1100° C.
  • 13. A method of making an implantable medical device comprising the stens of:a. providing a substrate having a shaped exterior surface capable of accommodating metal deposition thereupon: b. vacuum depositing a a biocompatible material onto the shaped exterior surface of the substrate at a deposition rate, with a substrate temperature, and at a deposition chamber pressure that controls a formation of heterogeneities on a surface of a biocompatible material layer: and c. forming the implantable medical device from the deposited biocompatible material, wherein the deposition rate is between about 10-100 microns/hour, the deposition chamber pressure is less than about 2×10−7 torr, and the substrate temperature is between about 300 and 1100° C.
  • 14. The method according to claim 13, wherein control of heterogeneities further comprises controlling at least one of grain size, grain phase, grain material composition, material composition and surface topography during vacuum deposition.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a divisional application and corresponds to and claims priority of U.S. utility patent application, Ser. No. 09/433,929, filed Nov. 19, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,348,960.

US Referenced Citations (184)
Number Name Date Kind
4444848 Shanefield et al. Apr 1984 A
4510182 Cornils et al. Apr 1985 A
4665906 Jervis May 1987 A
4751099 Niino et al. Jun 1988 A
4846834 von Recum et al. Jul 1989 A
5049251 Inoue Sep 1991 A
5061914 Busch et al. Oct 1991 A
5084151 Vallana Jan 1992 A
5133845 Vallana et al. Jul 1992 A
5158750 Finicle Oct 1992 A
5190546 Jervis Mar 1993 A
5242710 Claar et al. Sep 1993 A
5277933 Claar et al. Jan 1994 A
5358615 Grant et al. Oct 1994 A
5370684 Vallana et al. Dec 1994 A
5376463 Bak et al. Dec 1994 A
5387247 Vallana et al. Feb 1995 A
5421955 Lau et al. Jun 1995 A
5477864 Davidson Dec 1995 A
5482574 Goldstein Jan 1996 A
5508116 Barrett Apr 1996 A
5514154 Lau et al. May 1996 A
5540820 Terakado et al. Jul 1996 A
5545210 Hess et al. Aug 1996 A
5569295 Lam Oct 1996 A
5578149 De Scheerder Nov 1996 A
5593442 Klein Jan 1997 A
5597378 Jervis Jan 1997 A
5597458 Sanchez, Jr. Jan 1997 A
5603721 Lau et al. Feb 1997 A
5605714 Dearnaley et al. Feb 1997 A
5607445 Summers Mar 1997 A
5607463 Schwartz et al. Mar 1997 A
5609629 Fearnot et al. Mar 1997 A
5624508 Flomenblit et al. Apr 1997 A
5628788 Pinchuk May 1997 A
5630840 Mayer May 1997 A
5635144 Akluft Jun 1997 A
5647858 Davidson Jul 1997 A
5656036 Palmaz Aug 1997 A
5683453 Palmaz Nov 1997 A
5685961 Pourrezaei et al. Nov 1997 A
5690670 Davidson Nov 1997 A
5723219 Kolluri et al. Mar 1998 A
5725572 Lam et al. Mar 1998 A
5725573 Dearnaley et al. Mar 1998 A
5728150 McDonald et al. Mar 1998 A
5728158 Lau et al. Mar 1998 A
5728908 Welch et al. Mar 1998 A
5733303 Israel et al. Mar 1998 A
5735896 Amon et al. Apr 1998 A
5744515 Clapper Apr 1998 A
5744958 Werne Apr 1998 A
5765418 Rosenberg Jun 1998 A
5772864 Moller et al. Jun 1998 A
5776161 Globerman Jul 1998 A
5780807 Saunders Jul 1998 A
5782910 Davidson Jul 1998 A
5788558 Klein Aug 1998 A
5798042 Chu et al. Aug 1998 A
5811151 Hendricks et al. Sep 1998 A
5824045 Alt Oct 1998 A
5824049 Ragheb Oct 1998 A
5824056 Rosenberg Oct 1998 A
5840009 Fischell et al. Nov 1998 A
5843117 Alt et al. Dec 1998 A
5843120 Israel et al. Dec 1998 A
5843289 Lee et al. Dec 1998 A
5849206 Amon et al. Dec 1998 A
5853419 Imran Dec 1998 A
5855600 Alt Jan 1999 A
5855802 Acciai et al. Jan 1999 A
5855955 Claar et al. Jan 1999 A
5858556 Eckert et al. Jan 1999 A
5866113 Hendricks et al. Feb 1999 A
5868782 Frantzen Feb 1999 A
5873904 Ragheb et al. Feb 1999 A
5876432 Lau et al. Mar 1999 A
5879370 Fischell et al. Mar 1999 A
5891507 Jayaraman Apr 1999 A
5895406 Gray et al. Apr 1999 A
5899935 Ding May 1999 A
5907893 Zadno-Azizi Jun 1999 A
5913896 Boyle et al. Jun 1999 A
5919225 Lau et al. Jul 1999 A
5925063 Khosravi Jul 1999 A
5932036 Fukai Aug 1999 A
5932299 Katoot Aug 1999 A
5938682 Hojeibane et al. Aug 1999 A
5938697 Killion et al. Aug 1999 A
5945153 Dearnaley Aug 1999 A
5951881 Rogers et al. Sep 1999 A
5954724 Davidson Sep 1999 A
5955588 Tsang et al. Sep 1999 A
5962138 Kolluri et al. Oct 1999 A
5968091 Pinchuk et al. Oct 1999 A
5972018 Israel et al. Oct 1999 A
5972027 Johnson Oct 1999 A
5984905 Dearnaley et al. Nov 1999 A
6007573 Wallace et al. Dec 1999 A
6015429 Lau et al. Jan 2000 A
6016693 Viani et al. Jan 2000 A
6019784 Hines Feb 2000 A
6022370 Tower Feb 2000 A
6027526 Limon et al. Feb 2000 A
6033433 Ehr et al. Mar 2000 A
6042597 Kveen et al. Mar 2000 A
6056776 Lau et al. May 2000 A
6059808 Boussignac May 2000 A
6066167 Lau et al. May 2000 A
6066168 Lau et al. May 2000 A
6066169 McGuiness May 2000 A
6071305 Brown et al. Jun 2000 A
6086773 Dufresne et al. Jul 2000 A
6096175 Roth Aug 2000 A
6103320 Matsumoto et al. Aug 2000 A
6106642 DiCarlo et al. Aug 2000 A
6113705 Ohashi et al. Sep 2000 A
6113982 Claar et al. Sep 2000 A
6120536 Ding et al. Sep 2000 A
6120847 Yang et al. Sep 2000 A
6126761 DeHaven et al. Oct 2000 A
6126793 Sugiyama et al. Oct 2000 A
6136159 Buckfeller et al. Oct 2000 A
6149742 Carpenter et al. Nov 2000 A
H1924 Zabinski et al. Dec 2000 H
6156052 Richter et al. Dec 2000 A
6156373 Zhong et al. Dec 2000 A
6173672 Shepard, Jr. Jan 2001 B1
6190404 Palmaz et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190407 Ogle et al. Feb 2001 B1
6194088 Yoshida et al. Feb 2001 B1
6197013 Reed et al. Mar 2001 B1
6202304 Shatz Mar 2001 B1
6203505 Jalisi et al. Mar 2001 B1
6203732 Clubb et al. Mar 2001 B1
6207536 Matsumoto et al. Mar 2001 B1
6217952 Sugiyama et al. Apr 2001 B1
6231923 Teverovsky et al. May 2001 B1
6238491 Davidson et al. May 2001 B1
6245104 Alt Jun 2001 B1
6248401 Chiang et al. Jun 2001 B1
6253441 Wheat et al. Jul 2001 B1
6258121 Yang et al. Jul 2001 B1
6258182 Schetky et al. Jul 2001 B1
6258417 Goswami et al. Jul 2001 B1
6261320 Tam et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264595 Delfino et al. Jul 2001 B1
6264598 Armini Jul 2001 B1
6264687 Tomonto Jul 2001 B1
6267782 Ogle et al. Jul 2001 B1
6267867 Olson Jul 2001 B1
6274014 Matsumoto et al. Aug 2001 B1
6284316 Sandhu et al. Sep 2001 B1
6287277 Yan Sep 2001 B1
6287430 Matsumoto et al. Sep 2001 B1
6290720 Khosravi et al. Sep 2001 B1
6293966 Frantzen Sep 2001 B1
6299604 Ragheb et al. Oct 2001 B1
6299755 Richter Oct 2001 B1
6306141 Jervis Oct 2001 B1
6306276 Nobe et al. Oct 2001 B1
6309414 Rolando et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312456 Kranz et al. Nov 2001 B1
6312463 Rourke et al. Nov 2001 B1
6315794 Richter Nov 2001 B1
6322588 Ogle et al. Nov 2001 B1
6327772 Zadno-Azizi Dec 2001 B1
20010000043 Isreal et al. Mar 2001 A1
20010003146 Jalisi et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010009169 Kajiwara et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010009220 Mizuno et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010011158 Howland Aug 2001 A1
20010021570 Lin et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010032013 Marton Oct 2001 A1
20010037146 Lau et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010037147 Lau et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010039449 Johnson et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010047200 White et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010047201 Cox et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010055647 Tamura et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010055654 Halpern Dec 2001 A1
20020042649 Schaldach et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020165600 Banas et al. Nov 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (23)
Number Date Country
1452370 Mar 1974 DE
199 37 638 May 2001 DE
0 400 947 Dec 1990 EP
0 442 303 Aug 1991 EP
2 777 771 Oct 1999 FR
51055724 May 1976 JP
6188135 May 1986 JP
10072319 Oct 1999 JP
2110606 May 1998 RU
9707257 Feb 1997 WO
9744692 Nov 1997 WO
9813537 Apr 1998 WO
9845506 Oct 1998 WO
9916385 Apr 1999 WO
9923977 May 1999 WO
9962432 Dec 1999 WO
0054704 Sep 2000 WO
0055181 Sep 2000 WO
0135865 May 2001 WO
0153559 Jul 2001 WO
0155473 Aug 2001 WO
0156502 Aug 2001 WO
0191918 Dec 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (58)
Entry
Pub. No. 2002/0026899 A1, Pub. Date Mar. 7, 2002, McLaughlin et al.*
Palmaz et al. U.S. application Ser. No. 09,707685, filed Nov. 7, 2000.*
“Focused Ion Beam NonaFabrication”, http://www.glue.umd.edu/-astan/avs04.htm.
“Amorphous Carbon and C:N Thin Films” http://www.glue.umd.edu/-astan/avs61.htm.
Multilayer Ceramic/Metallic Coatings by Ion Beam-Assisted, Electron Beam Physical Vapor (EB-PVD) Desposition, Penn State Applied Research Applied Research Laboratory, pp. 1-4 (1997).
“Vacuum Conditions for Sputtering Thin Film TiNi”, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology, JVST A Online, pp. 1-2 (Abstract view).
“Oriented nickel-tetanium shape memory alloy films prepared by annealing during deposition”, by Kathleen Gisser, et al., Applied Physics Letters, vol. 61, Issue 14, pp. 1632-1634 (Abstract view).
“Relative importance of bombardment energy and intensity in ion plating”, K.S. Fancey, et al., Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces and Films, vol. 13, Issue 2, pp. 428-435 (Abstract view) Mar. 1995.
“Biocompatibility of Cardiac Cells on Silane-Modified Surfaces” AVS 45th International Symposium, Paper BI-WeM5 (Oct. 27, 1999).
“Biofunctionalization of Surfaces with Peptide Amphiphiles” AVS 46th International Symposium, Paper No. BI-WeM7 (Oct. 27, 1999).
“Plasma Copolymer Surfaces for Cell Culture” AVS 46th International Symposium, Paper No. Paper BI-WeM9 (Oct. 27, 1999).
“Plasma Co-polymer Surfaces for the Controlled Adsorption of Common Proteins” AVS 46th International Symposium, Paper No. BI-FrM2 (Oct. 19, 1999).
“Biofilm—Titanium Chemistry of Adhesion Using X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy” AVS 46th International Symposium, Paper No. BI-FrM10.
“Nanoscale Patterning of Gold for Attachment of Supported Lipid Bilayers” AVS 46th International Symposium, Paper No. BI-FrM10.
“The influence of ion radiation during film growth on the chemical stability of film/substrate systems” by W. Ensinger, Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 80, pp. 35-48 (1996).
“Progress in Thin Film Shape Memory Microactuators” by Johnston et al., www.sma-mems.com/recent.htm (Overview), pp. 1-5.
“Thin Film Shape Memory Allow Microactuators” by TiNi Alloy Company (online).
“Model Surfaces for Studying and Controlling the Adhesion of Cells” by M. Mrksich, AVS 47th International Symposium, Invited Paper No. BI+EL-TuA1 (Oct. 3, 2000).
“A Concise History of Vacuum Coating Technology, Part 2: 1940 to 1975” by D. Mattox, www.svc.org/HistoryofVac2.html, pp 1-15.
“Sputtering Targets High-Quality Thin Film Materials” by Ametek Specialty Metal Products online at www.ametek84.com/fd-sputtering.html, pp. 1-3.
“Endothelial Cell Organization of Micropatterned Protein Surfaces” by R. Daw, et al., AVS 47th International Symposium, Paper No. BI-WeP21 (Oct. 4, 2000).
“Tissue Formation of Hepatocytes on Micro-Porous Films by Polylactide” by T. Nishikawa, et al., AVS 47th International Symposium, Paper No. BI+EL-TuA10 (Oct. 3, 2000).
“Cell Response to Chemically and Topographically Modified Surfaces” by D.S. Sutherland, et al., AVS 47th International Symposium, Paper No. BI+EL-TuA3 (Oct. 3, 2000).
“Recent Progress in the Application of Thin Film Shape Memory Alloys” by A.D. Johnson and J.D. Busch, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, California, USA, pp. 299-310 (1994).
“Anomalous Plastic and Elastic Behaviors of Sputter-deposited TiN with 10 or 20 Inserted Thin A1 Layers Evaluated by Nanoindentation” by E. Kusano, et al., AVS 47th International Symposium, Paper No. TF-TuA3 (Oct. 3, 2000).
“The Nanomechanical Properties of Thin Films” by J.E. Houston, AVS 47th International Symposium, Paper No. TF-TuA1 (Oct. 3, 2000).
“Sputter-deposition of TiNi, TiNiPd and TiPd films displaying the two-way shape-memory effect” by E. Quandt, Sensors and Actuators, A53, pp. 434-439 (1996).
“Thin-film Processing of TiNi Shape Memory Alloy” by J.A. Waker and K.J. Gabriel, Sensors and Actuators, A21-A23, pp: 243-246 (1990).
“Shape Memory Properties in NiTI Sputter-deposited Film”, by J.D. Busch and A.D. Johnson, J. Appl. Phys. vol. 68, No. 12, pp. 6224-6226 (Dec. 15, 1990).
“A Temperature-Controlling Device for Refrigerators” by M.C. Shin, K.K. Jee and B.C. Ku, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies, pp 305-310 (1994).
“Multicomponent Film Deposition by Target Biasing”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, pp. 1-2 (Jul. 1980).
“Applications of Shape-Memory Alloy Thin Films” by A.D. Johnson and V.V. Martynov, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, California, USA, pp. 1-8 (1997).
“Role of Bio-Physiochemical Parameters in Cell Adhesion and Rolling-Simulation Analysis” by A. Alshorman, T. David and P. Walker, BED, vol. 50, pp. 209-210 (2001).
“Microstructure of Ti-Rich TiNi Thin Films” by A. Ishida, et al., Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, California, USA, pp. 161-166 (1997).
“Thin Film Shape Memory Microwaves with Adjustable Operation Temperature” by M. Kohl, D. Kittmann, E. Quandt, and B. Winzek, Sensors and Actuators, vol. 83, pp. 214-219 (2000).
“Liquid Sources for Chemical Vapor Deposition of Group 6 Metals and Metal Nitrides” by Gordon, et al., www.techtransfer.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/TALSearch.cgl?full_report=1&case=3, Case No. 1709.
“Fabrication of Small-Scale Coils and Bands as Photomasks on Optical Fibers for Generation of In-Fiber Gratings, Electromagnets as Micro-NMR Coils, Microtransformers, and Intra-Vascular Stents” www.techtransfer.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/TALSearch.cgi?full_reports=1&case=72, Case No. 1263.
“Reactions of Biological Cells to Nanostructures”, by Curtis, et al., AVS 46th International Symposium, Paper BI-WeM2 (Oct. 27, 1999).
“Benefits From Diamond-Like Coated Stainless Steel Stents”, http://www.phytis.com/stents0.htm, pp. 1-2.
“Adhesion of Bovine Serus Albumin on Coated DLC (Diamond-Like) and Uncoated (SiO2/TiO2) Sensor Chips”, http://www.phytis.com/stent4.htm, pp. 1-2.
“Flow Cytometric Investigation”, http://www.phytis.com/stent6.htm, pp. 1-3.
“Pre-clinical and Clinical Evaluation”, http://www.phytis.com/stent2.htm, pp. 1-2.
“The New Phytis Stent”, http://www.phytis.com/stent1.htm, pp. 1-2.
“Invulnerability and Resistance of DLC-Coating”, http://www.phytis.com/stent3.htm, pp. 1-3.
“Material In Use and Its Biocompatibility”, http://www.phytis.com/stent5.htm, pp. 1-2.
“Expertise Concerning the Implementation of the Phytis Diamond as Stent Performed at the Institute for Experimental Medicine (IEM)”, http://www.phytis.com/stent9.htm, pp. 1.
“Phytis L.D.A. Home Page information”, http://www.phytis.com/content/htm, pp. 1-15.
“Risk Analysis of Stents With a Diamond-Like Coated Surface For Use in Prosthetic Implants”, http://www.phytis.com/risk.htm, pp. 1-5.
“Directions for Use, Diamond AS® Stent”, http://www.phytis.com/direcuse.htm, pp. 1-8.
“Stents: Literature”, http://www.phytis.com/liter.htm, pp. 1-8.
“Thin Film Shape Memory Microvalves with Adjustable Operation Temperature” by Kohl, Dittmann, Quandt and Winzek, Sensors and Actuators, vol. 83, pp. 214-219, (2000).
“The Effects of Ion Irradiation on NiTi Shape Memory Alloy Thin Films” by F. Goldberg and E. Knystautas, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, California, USA, pp. 177-182 (1997).
“Constitutive Parts of a Shape Memory Alloy Titanium Nickel Thin Film Catheter” by L. Buchaillot, et al., Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies Asilomer Conference Center, Pacific Grove, California, USA, pp. 183-188 (1997).
“The Effect of HCD Technological Factors on the NiTi SMA Film Thickness” by Q. Pingshan, et al., Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, California, USA, pp. 173-176 (1997).
“The Characteristics of NiTi HCD-Deposited SMA Films” by H. Weixin, et al., Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, California, USA, pp. 167-172 (1997).
“Thin Film Shape Memory Alloy Microactuators” by TiNi Alloy Company (online).
“Progress in Thin Film Shape Microactuators” by Johnson, et al., www.sma-mems.com/recent.htm (Overview), pp 1-6.
“The influence of ion irradiation during film growth on the chemical stability of film/substrate systems” bu W. Ensinger, Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 80, pp. 35-48 (1996).