This application is a National Phase Application of PCT/IL02/00393, International Filing Date 20 May 2002 which claims priority from Israel Patent Application No. 143255, filed 20 May 2001.
The present invention is of a method for simulating ultrasound images, and in particular, for such a method for simulating ultrasound images which are produced during a medical diagnostic procedure.
ERCP (Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio Pancreatography) is a minimally invasive procedure which allows the doctor to perform necessary treatments such as enlarging a bile duct opening, removing gallstones lodged in the bile duct, inserting a stent (drain) in the duct or taking a biopsy specimen.
A flexible fiber optic tube, called a duodenoscope, is passed through the mouth, esophagus and stomach into the duodenum, which is the first part of the small intestine. The duodenoscope is a thin, flexible tube with a tiny video camera and light at one side of the tip. The papilla, which is an opening where the bile and pancreatic ducts empty into the duodenum, is visually identified. A small plastic tube, or cannula, is passed through the duodenoscope into the papilla. X-ray dye is injected through the cannula into the ducts. X-rays are then taken to study the ducts. Any necessary treatments can be performed at this time.
This treatment scheme is somewhat similar to gastro-endoscopy, in which an endoscope is inserted through the rectum in order to examine the large colon, for example. In both cases, students are taught to perform such procedures according to the traditional model for medical education, in which students observe and assist more experienced physicians. Unfortunately, such observation alone cannot provide the necessary training for such complicated medical procedures. Students may also perform procedures on animals and human cadavers, neither of which replicates the visual and tactile sensations of a live human patient. Thus, traditional medical training is not adequate for modern technologically complex medical procedures.
In an attempt to provide more realistic medical training for such procedures, simulation devices have been developed which attempt to replicate the tactile sensations and/or visual feedback for these procedures, in order to provide improved medical training without endangering human patients. An example of such a simulation device is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,403,191, in which the disclosed device is a box containing simulated human organs. Various surgical laparoscopic procedures can be performed on the simulated organs. Visual feedback is provided by a system of mirrors. However, the system of both visual and tactile feedback is primitive in this device, and does not provide a true representation of the visual and tactile sensations which would accompany such surgical procedures in a human patient. Furthermore, the box itself is not a realistic representation of the three-dimensional structure of a human patient. Thus, the disclosed device is lacking in many important aspects and fails to meet the needs of a medical simulation device.
Attempts to provide a more realistic experience from a medical simulation device are disclosed in PCT Patent Application Nos. WO 96/16389 and WO 95/02233. Both of these applications disclose a device for providing a simulation of the surgical procedure of laparoscopy. Both devices include a mannequin in the shape of a human torso, with various points at which simulated surgical instruments are placed. However, the devices are limited in that the positions of the simulated surgical instruments are predetermined, which is not a realistic scenario. Furthermore, the visual feedback is based upon a stream of video images taken from actual surgical procedures. However, such simple rendering of video images would result in inaccurate or unrealistic images as portions of the video data would need to be removed for greater processing speed. Alternatively, the video processing would consume such massive amounts of computational time and resources that the entire system would fail to respond in a realistic time period to the actions of the student. At the very minimum, a dedicated graphics workstation would be required, rather than a personal computer (PC). Thus, neither reference teaches or discloses adequate visual processing for real time visual feedback of the simulated medical procedure.
Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 4,907,973 discloses a device for simulating the medical procedure of flexible gastro-endoscopy. The disclosed device also suffers from the deficiencies of the above-referenced prior art devices, in that the visual feedback system is based upon rendering of video data taken from actual duodenoscopic procedures. As noted previously, displaying such data would either require massive computational resources, or else would simply require too much time for a realistic visual feedback response. Thus, the disclosed device also suffers from the deficiencies of the prior art.
A more useful and efficient medical simulation device for minimally invasive therapeutic procedures such as endoscopy is disclosed in PCT Application No. WO 99/38141, by the present inventors and incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. The disclosed medical simulation device provides real time, accurate and realistic visual feedback of general endoscopic procedures, as well as realistic tactile feedback, so that the visual and tactile systems are accurately linked for the simulation as for an actual medical procedure.
Duodenoscopy of the bilio-pancreatic system would also benefit from such realistic simulation, involving both visual and tactile feedback which are provided in an accurate manner. Bilio-pancreatic duodenoscopic procedures feature many of the same principles as gastro-endoscopy, since for both types of endoscopic procedures, an instrument is inserted into a body orifice, and must then be guided through a tubular organ without direct visual feedback. In addition, the physician performing the procedure must be able to correctly interpret both the indirect visual feedback provided through a video monitor, as well as the tactile feedback through the instrument itself. Therefore, both types of duodenoscopy require the physician to receive “hands-on” manual training for the correct performance of the procedure.
As part of the simulation of this procedure, the students should also be able to practice using the diagnostic tool of ultrasound. Ultrasonography is an optional adjunct to a large number of medical procedures, such as gastro-endoscopy and duodenoscopy. In addition, ultrasonography is itself an important medical procedure, which is used for example in order to safely visualize the fetus during pregnancy. Unfortunately, the background art does not feature suitable methods for accurately and efficiently simulating ultrasound images.
The background art does not teach or suggest a method and a system to efficiently and realistically simulate ultrasound images. Nor does the background art teach or suggest such a system and method for providing such images as part of the simulation of an overall medical procedure.
The present invention overcomes the deficiencies of the background art by providing a method and a system to simulate ultrasound images and hence for simulating the evaluation of a subject with such images as a diagnostic tool. For the purpose of simulating ultrasound images, these images may be considered to be planar slices of a given geometry. These slices are generated from the surface geometry of the portion of the subject which would receive the ultrasound waves if the ultrasound diagnostic procedure was actually being performed. Simulating such ultrasound images may therefore be performed by determining such images from surface models, and then rendering those ultrasound images at positions given by the tip of the scope. The rendering of such simulated ultrasound images also optionally and preferably includes the simulation of the “grainy” quality of such images.
According to the present invention, there is provided a method for simulating an ultrasound image of at least one anatomical feature of a subject, comprising: determining a surface geometry of the at least one anatomical feature; generating at least one planar slice of the surface geometry according to a location of a simulated source of ultrasound waves; and rendering the ultrasound image according to the at least one planar slice.
Hereinafter, the term “simulated medical procedure” refers to the simulation of the medical procedure as performed through the system and method of the present invention. Hereinafter, the term “actual medical procedure” refers to the performance of the medical procedure on an actual, living human patient with an actual medical instrument, such that the medical procedure is “real” rather than “simulated”. Hereinafter, the term “corresponding actual organ” refers to the “real” organ of a human being or other mammal which is being simulated by the simulated organ of the present invention.
Hereinafter, the term “subject” refers to the human or lower mammal upon which the method and system of the present invention are performed or operated. Hereinafter, the term “student” refers to any human using the system of the present invention, being trained according to the present invention or being taught according to the present invention including, but not limited to, students attending medical school or a university, a medical doctor, a trained pancreatic specialist or other trained medical specialist.
The foregoing and other objects, aspects and advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, wherein:
The present invention is related to a method and a system for simulating ultrasound images and hence for simulating the evaluation of a subject with such images as a diagnostic tool. Preferably, but not necessarily, the ultrasound images are simulated as though they had been collected during the evaluation of a subject with gastro-endoscopy and/or duodenoscopy, although of course ultrasound images could optionally be simulated as though they had been collected during substantially any medical procedure.
For the purpose of simulating ultrasound images, these images may be considered to be planar slices of a given geometry. These slices are generated from the surface geometry of the portion of the subject which would receive the ultrasound waves if the ultrasound diagnostic procedure was actually being performed. This surface geometry may optionally be modeled as polygonal models or other surface representation, optionally and more preferably by using common 3D graphic accelerator functionality. Thus, a real-time performance to this simulation may optionally be obtained.
Simulating such ultrasound images may therefore be performed by determining such images from surface models, and then rendering those ultrasound images at positions given by the tip of the scope. Such rendering is similar to that currently performed for modeling regular endoscopy procedures, and is also known as a “movement model”. One example of such a movement model is given in PCT Application No. WO 99/38141, filed on Jan. 15, 1999, which is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. This reference also describes an exemplary system for simulating a medical procedure, which could optionally be used with the present invention, for example. Of course, other systems and/or devices could also optionally be used with the method of the present invention.
The present invention differs from such methods of modeling visual data for gastro-endoscopic procedures in that additional areas of the subject, including additional organs and/or organ portions, must also be rendered, since ultrasound waves penetrate beyond the wall of the organ which actually contains the ultrasound probe.
The rendering of such simulated ultrasound images also optionally and preferably includes the simulation of the “grainy” quality of such images. This quality is inherent to the method of ultrasound itself, as it involves sending sound waves to the desired area of the subject and then listening to the echoes, in order to measure the time required for the echo to return. Of course, at least a portion of the actual signal would be attenuated, since not all of the sound waves are reflected by the tissue. The intensity of the echo is also measured to provide the “echoic property” of the object, in which white spots in an image are hyper-echoic, and black spots are hypo-echoic. The graininess of the image occurs since the sound waves reflect in all directions, so minor echoes that are reflected locations other than the organ being examined also return to the probe, causing static interference with the signal being measured. Such static interference then creates the grainy image.
The principles and operation of a method and a system according to the present invention for the simulation of the medical diagnostic procedure of ultrasound, may be better understood with reference to the drawings and the accompanying description, it being understood that these drawings are given for illustrative purposes only and are not meant to be limiting.
As shown in
As shown with regard to
First, a technique called “stenciling” is used to render a slice of an object from a specific plane into a texture (which is basically a bitmap or a digital picture). Stenciling is known in the art of real time graphics, and is also used to simulate shadows and create other real-time computer graphic effects, in conjunction with a stencil buffer. This technique is performed by positioning the viewpoint of a virtual “camera” above the desired plane, in the direction of the plane normal. Positioning of a virtual camera or viewpoint for generating three-dimensional computer graphics is achieved by giving the coordinates of the viewpoint in relation to the coordinates of the object being viewed, by using a standard coordinate system (such as that of the X, Y & Z Axes for example).
The near Z clip plane is then set to fit the cutting plane. The near Z clip plane is the distance from the camera at which objects begin to be seen, such that objects closer than that distance are clipped or not shown. The requirement for the near Z clip plane in the background art is due to mathematical inaccuracies in computers, as objects cannot to come infinitely close to the camera. However, for the purposes of the present invention, this parameter is preferably set at a specific location in order to cause the object to be cut at a specific plane, in order to be able to render the ultrasound image at that plane. This parameter could optionally be set in any type of three-dimensional (3D) rendering software to cause the object to be so clipped. The general function of a near Z clipping plane is to remove all the geometry that is closer to the camera than to that plane.
Next, both sides of the surface of the whole object are preferably rendered. All the surfaces of the object are rendered, even those which are not seen such as those which are removed from view, for example in the event that a near Z clipping plane has been applied. When the object is rendered, the stencil buffer associated with that software is preferably used to count the amount of pixels written to the buffer. If an even amount of pixels are written, the slice is not visible, and if an odd number of pixels are written, the slice is visible, as shown with regard to
A texture is then preferably selected which resembles the texture of the ultrasound image for the desired object, which could optionally be extracted from real ultrasound images of the organ or other tissue, such as images of the liver for example. Next, this texture is rendered by using the previously defined information from each slice as the alpha channel. The alpha channel is another color channel which is added frequently in 3D graphics and computer graphics generally, in addition to the common Red/Green/Blue channels (or color components). The alpha channel is related to the amount of transparency of the color. The data of the fourth channel is then preferably applied to all graphic components containing color. With regard to
With regard to the texture, in order to add visual realism to those portions of image in the previously described stencil buffer, texture is preferably added to those portions of the image having values of “1” in that buffer. For the purposes of this description, the texture is preferably added in grayscale, although of course colors could optionally be added.
These steps are preferably performed for each object separately until all visible object slices are rendered, resulting in a simulated image as shown below with regard to
All the work done previously is rendered to a surface that is not visible to the user, such that there is now a rectangular picture that represents slices of all the objects that intersected the US plane. If it is taken into consideration that the US probe is not straight, but is in fact an array of sensors in the shape of an an arc, the resulting image should be in the shape of a sector circumscribed by an arc parallel to the base arc of the sector. To obtain this image the rectangular picture is rendered onto a template in the shape of a sector as described above, in which the template is a polygonal model that describes the ultimate overall shape of the image. The result of these processes is shown in the exemplary image of
After these processes have been performed, the relevant anatomy has been modeled onto surface models of the anatomical feature, such as the organ. Each object has been rendered with the associated ultrasound properties, such as how the tissue responds to ultrasound waves in terms of echoing, and with a sample of the correct filling texture for simulation of the ultrasound image. For example, since moving the endoscope or other tool which holds the probe also alters the probe's position, the position of the cutting plane may be altered with each movement. In turn, the slices generated by the cutting plane are changed, such that a new ultrasound image is formed. The final simulated ultrasound image is then displayed to the user (see
As previously described, one of ordinary skill in the art could easily adjust the method of the present invention in order to accommodate different types of ultrasound scanning technologies. For example, for a radial scanning the device, the image would only have “blur” added, but would not be “bent”, because the plane of scanning is perpendicular to the device. Also, the image would be round rather than square.
It will be appreciated that the above descriptions are intended only to serve as examples, and that many other embodiments are possible within the spirit and the scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
143255 | May 2001 | IL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IL02/00393 | 5/20/2002 | WO | 00 | 8/6/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/094080 | 11/28/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1959490 | Mistelski | May 1934 | A |
3024539 | Rider | Mar 1962 | A |
3263824 | Jones et al. | Aug 1966 | A |
3406601 | Clifford | Oct 1968 | A |
3490059 | Paulsen et al. | Jan 1970 | A |
3517446 | Corlyon et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3520071 | Abrahamson et al. | Jul 1970 | A |
3573444 | Kawabata et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3579842 | Scher | May 1971 | A |
3704529 | Cioppa | Dec 1972 | A |
3722108 | Chase | Mar 1973 | A |
3739276 | Dornberger | Jun 1973 | A |
3775865 | Rowan | Dec 1973 | A |
3789518 | Chase | Feb 1974 | A |
3795061 | Sarnoff et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3795150 | Eckhardt | Mar 1974 | A |
3814145 | Gott et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3861065 | Courtenay et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3875488 | Crocker et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3919691 | Noll | Nov 1975 | A |
3945593 | Schanzer | Mar 1976 | A |
3991490 | Markman | Nov 1976 | A |
4024473 | Edge et al. | May 1977 | A |
4024873 | Antoshkiw et al. | May 1977 | A |
4033331 | Guss et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4078317 | Wheatley et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4089494 | Anderson et al. | May 1978 | A |
4115755 | Cotton | Sep 1978 | A |
4136554 | Larson | Jan 1979 | A |
4148014 | Burson | Apr 1979 | A |
4162582 | McGraw et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4177984 | Douglas et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4182054 | Wise et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4183249 | Anderson | Jan 1980 | A |
4227319 | Guy et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4236685 | Kissel | Dec 1980 | A |
4250636 | Horwitz | Feb 1981 | A |
4250887 | Dardik et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4262549 | Schwellenbach | Apr 1981 | A |
4264312 | Cianci | Apr 1981 | A |
4276702 | Horwitz | Jul 1981 | A |
4307539 | Klein | Dec 1981 | A |
4333070 | Barnes | Jun 1982 | A |
4334216 | Lacroix | Jun 1982 | A |
4360345 | Hon | Nov 1982 | A |
4398889 | Lam et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4427388 | Hope | Jan 1984 | A |
4436188 | Jones | Mar 1984 | A |
4459113 | Boscaro Gatti et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4464117 | Foerst | Aug 1984 | A |
4478407 | Manabe | Oct 1984 | A |
4481001 | Graham et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4504233 | Galus et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4513235 | Acklam et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4545390 | Leary | Oct 1985 | A |
4550617 | Fraignier et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4551101 | Neumann | Nov 1985 | A |
4573452 | Greenberg | Mar 1986 | A |
4599070 | Hladky et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4604016 | Joyce | Aug 1986 | A |
4605373 | Rosen | Aug 1986 | A |
4632341 | Repperger et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4642055 | Saliterman | Feb 1987 | A |
4646742 | Packard et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4654648 | Herrington et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4655673 | Hawkes | Apr 1987 | A |
4659313 | Kuster et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4667182 | Murphy | May 1987 | A |
4688983 | Lindbom | Aug 1987 | A |
4706006 | Solomon | Nov 1987 | A |
4708650 | Holewinski et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4708656 | de Vries et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4712101 | Culver | Dec 1987 | A |
4713007 | Alban | Dec 1987 | A |
4726772 | Amplatz | Feb 1988 | A |
4733214 | Andresen | Mar 1988 | A |
4742815 | Ninan et al. | May 1988 | A |
4748984 | Patel | Jun 1988 | A |
4751662 | Crosbie | Jun 1988 | A |
4757302 | Hatakeyama et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4769763 | Trieb et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4775289 | Kazerooni | Oct 1988 | A |
4782327 | Kley et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4786892 | Kubo et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4789340 | Zikria | Dec 1988 | A |
4794384 | Jackson | Dec 1988 | A |
4795296 | Jau | Jan 1989 | A |
4797104 | Laerdal et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4803413 | Kendig et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4820162 | Ross | Apr 1989 | A |
4823634 | Culver | Apr 1989 | A |
4825875 | Ninan et al. | May 1989 | A |
4839838 | LaBiche et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4857881 | Hayes | Aug 1989 | A |
4860215 | Seraji | Aug 1989 | A |
4865423 | Doi | Sep 1989 | A |
4867685 | Brush et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4868549 | Affinito et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4870964 | Bailey, Jr. et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4874998 | Hollis, Jr. | Oct 1989 | A |
H703 | Repperger et al. | Nov 1989 | H |
4879556 | Duimel | Nov 1989 | A |
4881324 | Khinchuk | Nov 1989 | A |
4885565 | Embach | Dec 1989 | A |
4887966 | Gellerman | Dec 1989 | A |
4891764 | McIntosh | Jan 1990 | A |
4896554 | Culver | Jan 1990 | A |
4907796 | Roel-Rodriguez | Mar 1990 | A |
4907970 | Meenen | Mar 1990 | A |
4907973 | Hon | Mar 1990 | A |
4909232 | Carella | Mar 1990 | A |
4912638 | Pratt | Mar 1990 | A |
4930770 | Baker | Jun 1990 | A |
4934694 | McIntosh | Jun 1990 | A |
4940234 | Ishida et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4949119 | Moncrief et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4955654 | Tsuchihashi et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4961138 | Gorniak | Oct 1990 | A |
4961267 | Herzog | Oct 1990 | A |
4964097 | Wang et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4975546 | Craig | Dec 1990 | A |
4982618 | Culver | Jan 1991 | A |
4982918 | Kaye | Jan 1991 | A |
4998916 | Hammerslag et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5004391 | Burdea | Apr 1991 | A |
5007300 | Siva | Apr 1991 | A |
5009598 | Bennington | Apr 1991 | A |
5018922 | Yoshinada et al. | May 1991 | A |
5019761 | Kraft | May 1991 | A |
5021982 | Crosbie et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5022384 | Freels et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5033352 | Kellogg et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5044956 | Behensky et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5048508 | Storz | Sep 1991 | A |
5055051 | Duncan | Oct 1991 | A |
5057078 | Foote et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5062594 | Repperger | Nov 1991 | A |
5072361 | Davis et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5077769 | Franciose | Dec 1991 | A |
5078152 | Bond et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5086296 | Clark | Feb 1992 | A |
5103404 | McIntosh | Apr 1992 | A |
5104328 | Lounsbury | Apr 1992 | A |
5112228 | Zouras | May 1992 | A |
5116051 | Moncrief et al. | May 1992 | A |
5116180 | Fung et al. | May 1992 | A |
5125843 | Holloway | Jun 1992 | A |
5126948 | Mitchell et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5135488 | Foote et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5139261 | Openiano | Aug 1992 | A |
5142931 | Menahem | Sep 1992 | A |
5143505 | Burdea et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5146566 | Hollis, Jr. et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5149270 | McKeown | Sep 1992 | A |
5151856 | Halmann et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5153716 | Smith | Oct 1992 | A |
5158459 | Edelberg | Oct 1992 | A |
5167159 | Lucking | Dec 1992 | A |
5171299 | Heitzmann et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5177473 | Drysdale | Jan 1993 | A |
5180351 | Ehrenfried | Jan 1993 | A |
5181181 | Glynn | Jan 1993 | A |
5184306 | Erdman et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5184319 | Kramer | Feb 1993 | A |
5185561 | Good et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5186629 | Rohen | Feb 1993 | A |
5189355 | Larkins et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5191320 | MacKay | Mar 1993 | A |
5193963 | McAffee et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5196017 | Silva et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197003 | Moncrief et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5203563 | Loper, III | Apr 1993 | A |
5204600 | Kahkoska | Apr 1993 | A |
5209131 | Baxter | May 1993 | A |
5209661 | Hildreth et al. | May 1993 | A |
5212473 | Louis | May 1993 | A |
5215523 | Williams et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5220260 | Schuler | Jun 1993 | A |
5222893 | Hardesty | Jun 1993 | A |
5223776 | Radke et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5228356 | Chuang | Jul 1993 | A |
5230339 | Charlebois | Jul 1993 | A |
5240417 | Smithson et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5243266 | Kasagami et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5246007 | Frisbie et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5247432 | Ueda | Sep 1993 | A |
5252068 | Gryder | Oct 1993 | A |
5252070 | Jarrett | Oct 1993 | A |
5257462 | Buttermann | Nov 1993 | A |
5259626 | Ho | Nov 1993 | A |
5259894 | Sampson | Nov 1993 | A |
5264768 | Gregory et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5265034 | Breckenridge et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5269519 | Malone | Dec 1993 | A |
5275174 | Cook | Jan 1994 | A |
5275565 | Moncrief | Jan 1994 | A |
5279309 | Taylor | Jan 1994 | A |
5279563 | Brucker et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5280265 | Kramer et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5283970 | Aigner | Feb 1994 | A |
5286203 | Fuller et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5295694 | Levin | Mar 1994 | A |
5296846 | Ledley | Mar 1994 | A |
5296871 | Paley | Mar 1994 | A |
5305203 | Raab | Apr 1994 | A |
5309140 | Everett, Jr. et al. | May 1994 | A |
5311422 | Loftin et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313230 | Venolia et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313568 | Wallace et al. | May 1994 | A |
5314339 | Aponte | May 1994 | A |
5317689 | Nack et al. | May 1994 | A |
5318533 | Adams et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5324260 | O'Neill et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5327790 | Levin et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5334027 | Wherlock | Aug 1994 | A |
5335557 | Yasutake | Aug 1994 | A |
5344354 | Wiley | Sep 1994 | A |
5353242 | Crosbie et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5354162 | Burdea et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5355148 | Anderson | Oct 1994 | A |
5364271 | Aknin et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5366376 | Copperman et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368478 | Andreiko et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368484 | Copperman et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368487 | Medina | Nov 1994 | A |
5368565 | DeLong | Nov 1994 | A |
5370535 | Prendergast | Dec 1994 | A |
5379663 | Hara | Jan 1995 | A |
5382885 | Salcudean et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5384460 | Tseng | Jan 1995 | A |
5385549 | Lampropoulos et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5389865 | Jacobus et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5396267 | Bouton | Mar 1995 | A |
5397308 | Ellis et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5397323 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5399091 | Mitsumoto | Mar 1995 | A |
5402801 | Taylor | Apr 1995 | A |
5403191 | Tuason | Apr 1995 | A |
5412189 | Cragun | May 1995 | A |
5412880 | Raab | May 1995 | A |
5414337 | Schuler | May 1995 | A |
5423754 | Cornelius et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5425644 | Szinicz | Jun 1995 | A |
5425709 | Gambale | Jun 1995 | A |
5428748 | Davidson et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5429140 | Burdea et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5430665 | Jin et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436640 | Reeves | Jul 1995 | A |
5437290 | Bolger et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445166 | Taylor | Aug 1995 | A |
5451924 | Massimino et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5459382 | Jacobus et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5461711 | Wang et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467441 | Stone et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5467763 | McMahon et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5470232 | Kelso et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5473235 | Lance et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5482051 | Reddy et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5492530 | Fischell et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5506605 | Paley | Apr 1996 | A |
5512919 | Araki | Apr 1996 | A |
5515078 | Greschler et al. | May 1996 | A |
5524637 | Erickson | Jun 1996 | A |
5541831 | Thomas | Jul 1996 | A |
5542672 | Meredith | Aug 1996 | A |
5542676 | Howe, Jr. et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5547382 | Yamasaki et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5548694 | Frisken | Aug 1996 | A |
5553198 | Wang et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559412 | Schuler | Sep 1996 | A |
5565840 | Thorner et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5575761 | Hajianpour | Nov 1996 | A |
5577981 | Jarvik | Nov 1996 | A |
5580249 | Jacobsen et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584701 | Lampotang et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5587937 | Massie et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5591924 | Hilton | Jan 1997 | A |
5592401 | Kramer | Jan 1997 | A |
5599301 | Jacobs et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5600348 | Bartholow et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5607157 | Nagashima | Mar 1997 | A |
5607308 | Copperman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5609485 | Bergman et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5609607 | Hechtenberg et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5616030 | Watson | Apr 1997 | A |
5623582 | Rosenberg | Apr 1997 | A |
5625551 | Mitarai et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625576 | Massie et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629594 | Jacobus et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631861 | Kramer | May 1997 | A |
5631973 | Green | May 1997 | A |
5643087 | Marcus et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5651775 | Walker et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657429 | Wang et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661253 | Aoki | Aug 1997 | A |
5661667 | Rueb et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666473 | Wallace | Sep 1997 | A |
5669818 | Thorner et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5676157 | Kramer | Oct 1997 | A |
5680590 | Parti | Oct 1997 | A |
5684722 | Thorner et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5691898 | Rosenberg et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694013 | Stewart et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5695500 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701140 | Rosenberg et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5709219 | Chen et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5716016 | Iwade et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720619 | Fisslinger | Feb 1998 | A |
5722403 | McGee et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5724264 | Rosenberg et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5731804 | Rosenberg | Mar 1998 | A |
5736978 | Hasser et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5739811 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742278 | Chen et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749853 | O'Donnell et al. | May 1998 | A |
5755577 | Gillio | May 1998 | A |
5758649 | Iwashita et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5766016 | Sinclair et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768413 | Levin et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5769640 | Jacobus et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771181 | Moore et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5776050 | Chen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5776126 | Wilk et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5781172 | Engel et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782764 | Werne | Jul 1998 | A |
5797900 | Madhani et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800179 | Bailey | Sep 1998 | A |
5805140 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5806521 | Morimoto et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807377 | Madhani et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808665 | Green | Sep 1998 | A |
5810007 | Holupka et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821920 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5831408 | Jacobus et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841889 | Seyed-Bolorforosh | Nov 1998 | A |
5844392 | Peurach et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5882206 | Gillio | Mar 1999 | A |
5889670 | Schuler et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889672 | Schuler et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5930741 | Kramer | Jul 1999 | A |
5945978 | Holmes | Aug 1999 | A |
5956484 | Rosenberg et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5986643 | Harvill et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999185 | Kato et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004134 | Marcus et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6019724 | Gronningsaeter et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6024576 | Bevirt et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037927 | Rosenberg | Mar 2000 | A |
6038488 | Barnes et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042555 | Kramer et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6050962 | Kramer et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059506 | Kramer | May 2000 | A |
6062865 | Bailey | May 2000 | A |
6084587 | Tarr et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088017 | Tremblay et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104379 | Petrich et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110130 | Kramer | Aug 2000 | A |
6111577 | Zilles et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6117078 | Lysyansky et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120465 | Guthrie et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6148280 | Kramer | Nov 2000 | A |
6157193 | Renz et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160489 | Perry et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162174 | Friemel | Dec 2000 | A |
6162190 | Kramer | Dec 2000 | A |
6193657 | Drapkin | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195592 | Schuler | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210168 | Aiger et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219032 | Rosenberg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222523 | Harvill et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6239784 | Holmes | May 2001 | B1 |
6264609 | Herrington et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275213 | Tremblay et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6318146 | Madsen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323837 | Rosenberg | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6346940 | Fukunaga | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6413229 | Kramer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428490 | Kramer et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6497672 | Kramer | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6544041 | Damadian | Apr 2003 | B1 |
RE38242 | Engel et al. | Sep 2003 | E |
6694163 | Vining | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6876891 | Schuler et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6885361 | Harvill et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6939138 | Chosack et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7215326 | Rosenberg | May 2007 | B2 |
20020072814 | Schuler et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020168618 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020176619 | Love | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030112922 | Burdette et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040034301 | Falco | Feb 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 147 516 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0 265 011 | Apr 1988 | EP |
0 393 683 | Oct 1990 | EP |
0 456 103 | Nov 1991 | EP |
0 489 469 | Jun 1992 | EP |
0 316 763 | Aug 1992 | EP |
0 567 215 | Oct 1993 | EP |
0 571 827 | Dec 1993 | EP |
0 624 861 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0 626 634 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0 623 066 | Jul 1997 | EP |
0 632 709 | Mar 2002 | EP |
2592514 | Dec 1985 | FR |
2 195 808 | Apr 1988 | GB |
2 252 656 | Aug 1992 | GB |
2 288 686 | Oct 1995 | GB |
03-98080 | Apr 1991 | JP |
WO9106935 | May 1991 | WO |
WO 9111775 | Aug 1991 | WO |
WO 9304625 | Mar 1993 | WO |
WO 9308517 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 9314483 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9318475 | Sep 1993 | WO |
WO 9425948 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 9502233 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO 9502233 | Jan 1995 | WO |
WO9510080 | Apr 1995 | WO |
WO 9532459 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9616389 | May 1996 | WO |
WO 9616389 | May 1996 | WO |
WO9628800 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO 9938141 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9938141 | Jul 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Yoshitaka, Adachi et al. Intermediate Interpretation for Stiff Virtual Objects Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (VRAIS' 95) Technical Research Center, Suzuki Motor Corporation, Yokohama, Japan. |
M.L. Agronin. The Design of a Nine-String Six-Degree-of-Freedom Force-Feedback Joystick for Telemanipulation. pp. 340-348 Jet Propulsion Laboratory—California, LA. |
Peter K Allen et al. Acquisition and Interpretation of 3-D Sensor Data from Touch Dept. of Computer Science, Columbia University, NY CH2813-4/89/0000/0033/$01.00 1989 IEEE pp. 33-40. |
Fumihito Arai et al. Intelligent Assistance in Operation of Active Catheter for Minimum Invasive Surgery. Nagoya University—Nagoya, Japan Kinjo University—Nagoya, Japan IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication 0-7803-2002-6/94 $4.00 1994 IEEE. |
Daniel Bachofen et al. Enhancing the Visual Realism of Hysteroscopy Simulation Book Series: Studies in Health Technology and Informatics—Book Medicine meets Virtual Reality 14: Accelerating Change in Health Care: Next Medical Toolkit vol. 119/2005 pp. 31-36. |
J. Baille et al. Use of Computer Graphics Simulation for Teaching of Flexible Sigmoidoscopy. Duke University Medical Center, North Carolina, USA. Endoscopy 3 vol. May 23, 1991 pp. 126-129. |
David Baraff An Introduction to Physically Based Modeling: Ridged Body Simulation II—Nonpenetration Constraints Robotics Institute Carnegie Mellon Institute pp. 32-68 1997. |
Adelstein et al. ASME Symposium 1992 Design and Implementation of a Force Reflecting Manipuladum for Manual Control Research. CA, USA. |
J.H. Anderson et al. Da Vinci: A Vascular Catheterization and Interventional Radiology-Based Training and Patient Pretreatment Planning Simulator (Abstract) JVIR Supplement, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 7, No. 1, Part 2. Jan.-Feb. 1996 Washington, US. |
J. Batter and F. Brooks, Jr. Grope-1: A Computer Display to the Sense of Feel 1972 North Carolina, USA. |
M. Bostrom et al. Design of an Interactive Lumbar Puncture Simulator With Tactile Feedback IEEE Neutral Network Counsel Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium Conference Sep. 18-22, 1993; Seattle, Washington U.S. |
M. Bostrom Design of Hardware for Simulating Lumbar Puncture with Force Feedback Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College. Mar. 17, 1993. |
F. P. Brooks, et al. Project Grope—Haptic Displays for Scientific Visualization ACM, Computer Graphics, vol. 24, No. 4. Aug. 1990—Chapel Hill NC, USA. |
G. Burdea and T. Speeter Nasa Portable Dextrous Force Feedback Master for Robot Telemanipulation (PDMFF) pp. 153-161 Technical Report Server (NTRS), NJ ,USA. |
Burdea et al. A Distributed Virtual Environment with Dextrous Force Feedback Informatique '92, International Conference Interface to Real and Virtual Worlds, Rutgers University EC2 Conference Mar. 23-27, 1992, NJ, USA. |
J. Capowski, Remote Manipulators as a Computer Input Device University Microfilms, A XEROX Company, Ann Arbor, Michigan UMI Dissertation Services. 1971—Michigan USA. |
Cover et al. Interactively Deformable Models for Surgery Simulation (Object Modeling) Computer Graphics & Applications IEEE pp. 68-75 Atlanta, GA, USA. |
J. S. Denson and S. Abrahamson A Computer-Controlled Patient Simulator Apr. 21, 1969—vol. 208, No. 3 pp. 504-508 LA, USA. |
D. Gillies and C. Williams, London UK An Interactive Graphic Simulator for the Teaching of Fibrendoscopic Techniques Eurographics '87 Elsevier Science Publishers B.V North Holland pp. 127-138. |
Gillies, Haritsis and Williams Computer Simulation for Teaching Endoscopic Procedures Endoscopy, Supplement II, vol. 24, Jul. 1992. pp. 455-550. |
A. Haritsis D. Gillies Ch. Williams (Eurographics) Realistic Generation and Real Time Animation of Images of the Human Colon Computer Graphics Forum vol. II No. 3, conference issue—Sep. 7-11, 1992. NNC Blackwell. |
Haritsis 1992 (Hellenic) A.Haritsis D. Gillies Ch. Williams Computer Simulation: New Horizons in Endoscopy Teaching Hellenic Journal of Gastroenterology 1992 pp. 54-63 London UK. |
G. Higgins, et al. Higgins 1995 (Surg. Tech. Int'l IV) Virtual Reality Surgery: Implementation of a Coronary Angioplasty Training Simulator. University Medical Press, San Francisco, 1995. pp. 379-383. |
D. Hon Ixion's Laparoscopic Surgical Skills Simulator Symposium: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II Jan. 27-30, 1994 San Diego, USA. |
D. Hon Ixion's Realistic Medical Simulations Virtual Reality World, vol. 2, No. 4 Jul./Aug. 1994 pp. 58-62. |
H. Iwata Artificial Reality with Force-feedback: Development of Desktop Virtual Space with Compact Master Manipulator. ACM SIGGRPAH 1990 Computer Graphics & Interactive Techniques vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 165-170 Aug. 6-10, 1990. |
B.G Jackson L.B Rosenberg Force Feedback and Medical Simulation IOS Press and Ohmsha Jan. 19-22, 1995 pp. 147-151—CA, USA. |
P.J. Kilpatrick Kilpatrick Thesis 1976 pp. 11-27 The Use of a Kinesthetic Supplement in an Interactive Graphics System. The University of North Carolina, USA. |
Kotoku et al. A Force Display System for Virtual Environments and its Evaluation International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication IEEE Sep. 1-3, 1992 pp. 246-251—Ibaraki, Japan. |
U.G. Kuhnapfel Realtime Graphical Computer Simulation for Endoscopic Surgery Symposium: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II Jan. 27-30, 1994 San Diego, CA, USA. |
U.G.Kuhnapfel et al. Endo surgery simulations with KISMET: a flexible tool for surgical instrument design, operation room planning and VR technology based abdominal surgery training. Virtual Reality World '95, Conference Stuttgart, Germany Computerwoche Verlag, 1995. pp. 165-171. |
B. Marcus Feedback Technology and Virtual Environments pp. 87-95 Jul. 1-3, 1992—1992 International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence (ICAT 1992) pp. 87-95. |
Mark et al. Adding Force Feedback to Graphics Systems: Issues and Solutions Aug. 4-9, 1996 ACM SIGGRAPH 1996 Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Chapel Hill. North Carolina, Usa. |
T.H. Massie Design of a Three Degree of Freedom Force-Reflecting Haptic Interface MIT, USA Thesis—pp. 6-38 May 18, 1993 Submitted May 17, 1993. |
K.T. McGovern et al. The Virtual Clinic™, A Virtual Reality Surgical Simulator Symposium: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II pp. 151-157 Jan. 27-30, 1994 San-Diego CA, USA. |
D. Meglan Making Surgical Simulation Real ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics pp. 37-39 Nov. 1996 Rockville, MD, USA. |
Meglan et al. The Teleos Virtual Environment Toolkit for Simulation-Based Surgical Education Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Healthcare Proceeding of MMVR 3, IOS Press and Ohmsha pp. 346-351. Jan. 17-20, 1996 San-Diego CA, USA. |
J. R. Merril The Future of Virtual Reality, Medicine, and the Information Superhighway Journal of Knowledge Engineering & Technology, vol. 7, No. 1 Spring 1994 pp. 33-35 MD, USA. |
Merril et al. Photorealistic Interactive Three-Dimensional Graphics in Surgical Simulation Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Healthcare Proceeding of MMVR 3, IOS Press and Ohmsha pp. 244-252 Jan. 19-22, 1995 San Diego, USA. |
Merril et al. Surgical Simulation Using Virtual Reality Technology: Design, Implementation, and Implications. Surgical Technology International III 1994 pp. 53-60. Published by Universal Medical Press, CA, USA. |
Merril et al. Virtual Heart Surgery—Trade Show and Medical Education 1994 Virtual Reality World pp. 55-57 Jul./Aug. 1994 MD, USA. |
Merril et al Cyber Surgery—Cutting Costs, Sewing Benefits The Virtual Reality Special Report, Miller Freedman Inc. Summer 1994 pp. 39-42 MD, USA. |
Minsky et al. Feeling and Seeing: Issues in Force Display ACM 1990 pp. 235-243 CA, USA. |
M.D. Noar N. Soehendra Endoscopy Simulation Training Devices Endoscopy 1992, vol. 24 pp. 159-166 Georg Thieme Vering Stuttgart. New York. |
M.D. Noar Robotics Interactive Simulation of RCP Sphincterotomy and EGD, Endoscopy 1992, vol. 24, pp. 539-541 Supplement 2 Georg Thieme Vering Stuttgart. New York. |
A. M. Noll Man-Machine Tactile Communication Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn, Jun. 1971, pp. 1V-X111 and 1-87. |
Ernest M. Otani Software Tools for Dynamic and Kinematic Modeling of Human Emotion Department of Computer & Information Science Technical Reports (CIS) University of Pennsylvania, Jul. 1989, pp. 1-74. |
M. Ouh-Young Force Display in Molecular Docking UNC, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 1990, pp. 1-369. |
J. Peifer, et al. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Health Care in the Information Age Applied Virtual Reality for Simulation of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreatography IOM Press, Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 4, San Diego, California, Jan. 17-20, 1996, pp. 36-42. |
S. Pieper et al. Stereoscopic Displays and Applications II Virtual environment system for simulation of leg surgery SPIE vol. 1457, Feb. 25-27, 1991, pp. 188-197. |
S. Pieper et al. Interactive Graphics for Plastic Surgery: A task-level analysis and Implementation 1992 ACM Computer Graphics Special Issue on 1992 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, Cambridge, MA Mar. 29-Apr. 1, 1992, pp. 127-134. |
D. Popa Simulation of Lumbar Puncture Procedure using Force Feedback in Virtual Environments Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, Jun. 1994, pp. 1-134. |
Preminger et al. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality, Health Care in the Information Age Virtual Reality Surgical Simulation in Endoscopic Urologic Surgery IOM Press, Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 4, San Diego, California, Jan. 17-20, 1996, Chapter 19, pp. 157-163. |
L.B Rosenberg, B.G Jackson Foot-Based Interfaces to Virtual Environments Using the Immersion Interface Box (TM) Virtual Reality and Persons With Disabilities, Second Annual International Conference, Jun. 8-10, 1994, pp. 145-148. |
L.B Rosenberg “Virtual Fixtures”—Perceptual overlays enhance operator performance in telepresence tasks Stanford University, Aug. 1994. pp. 1-214. |
M. A. Russo The Design and Implementation of a Three Degree of Freedom of Freedom Force Output Joystick MIT, May 11, 1990. pp. 1-131. |
Salisbury et al. Haptic Rendering: Programming Touch Interaction with Virtual Objects Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 1995 ACM, pp. 123-130. |
S. S. Saliterman A Computerized Simulator for Critical-Care Training: New Technology for Medical Education Scientific session of the Mayo Medical School Alumni Society , Nov. 4, 1989, pp. 968-978. |
B. Schmult et al. Application Areas for a Force-Feedback Joystick DSC vol. 49. Advances in Robotics, Mechatronics, and Haptic Interfaces ASME 1993, pp. 47-54. |
Singh et al. Design of an Interactive Lumbar Puncture Simulator With Tactile Feedback IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 8-13, 1994, pp. 1734-1739. |
M. Stanley and J. Colgate Computer Simulation of Interacting Dynamic Mechanical Systems using Distributed Memory Parallel Processors ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Nov. 8-13, 1992, pp. 55-61. |
Sharon A. Stansfield Visually-Guided Haptic Object Recognition University of Pennsylvania 1987 UMI, pp. 1-216. |
I. Sutherland The Ultimate Display for Production Proceedings of the IFIP Congress 1965, pp. 506-508. |
D. Terzopoulos and D. Metaxas Dynamic 3D Models with Local and Global Deformations: Deformable Superquadrics IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 13, No. 7, Aug. 30, 1990, pp. 703-714. |
Williams, Baillie, Gillies, Borislow and Cotton Teaching Gastrointestinal Endoscopy by Computer Simulation: a Prototype for Colonoscopy and ERCP Gastrointestinal Endoscopy vol. 36, No. 1., 1990, pp. 49-54. |
C. M. Winey III Computer Simulated Visual and Tactile Feedback as an aid to Manipulator and Vehicle Control MIT, Jul. 31, 1981, pp. 1-132. |
O.C Zienkiewicz The Finite Element Method McGraw-Hill Book Company (UK) Limited, 1977, pp. 677-757. |
Beth A. Marcus Hands On: Haptic Feedback in Surgical Simulation Exos, Inc., Jan. 27-30, 1994, pp. SIMB 004163-SIMB 004174. |
Virtual Reality and Medicine the Cutting Edge SIG Advanced Applications, Inc. Conference and Exhibition, Sep. 8-11, 1994, The New York Hilton. |
Daane et al. A $100 Surgical Simulator for the IBM PC Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Healthcare Jan. 1995—pp. 79-80. |
Higgins U.S. Army Medical Research Grant Annual Report entitled “Medical Simulation for Trauma Management” Grant No. DAMD 17-94-J-4470. |
Strutz et al. 3-D Guided Endoscopic Surgery of Paranasal Sinusese Surgical Technology International IV, Oct. 1995, pp. 195-197. |
Stone Haptic Human-Computer Interaction—Haptic Feedback: A Brief History from Telepresence to Virtual Reality Haptic Human-Computer Interaction, First International Workshop, Glasgow, UK Proceedings. Aug. 31-Sep. 1, 2000. |
Loftin et al. A Virtual Environment for Laparoscopic Surgical Training Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II: Interactive Technology & Healthcare, Jan. 1994. |
Durrani et al. Advanced Endoscopic Imaging: 3-D Laparoscopic Endoscopy Surgical Technology International III, Oct. 1994. |
Johnston et al. Assessing a Virtual Reality Surgical Skills Simulator Stud Health Technol Inform. 1996; 29:608-17. |
Sheridan Automatica the Journal of IFAC the International Federation of Automatic Control / Telerobotics. Automatica, vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 487-507. |
Barfield et al Virtual Environments and Advanced Interface Design 1995 pp. 358-414. |
Bejczy et al. Controlling Remote Manipulators Through Kinesthetic Coupling Computers in Mechanical Engineering Jul. 1983, pp. 48-60. |
Beer-Gable Computer Assisted Training in Endoscopy (C.A.T.E.): From a Simulator to a Learning Station.Endoscopy 1992; 24:suppl. 2: pp. 534-538. |
Kuenhapfel et al. CAD-Based Graphical Computer Simulation in Endoscopic Surgery Institute fur Angewandte Informatik, Kernforschumgszentr urn Karlsruhe Germany, Oct. 1994. |
Campos et al. A Robotic Haptic System Architecture University of Pennsylvania, Dept. of Computer & Information Science Technical Reprot No. MS-CIS-00-51 1990. |
Merril et al. Changing the Focus of Surgical Training Virtual Reality World, Mar./Apr. 1995, pp. 56-60. |
Szabo et al. Choreographed Instrument Movements During Laparoscopic Surgery: Needle Driving, Knot Tying, and Anastomosis Techniques. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II; Interactive Technology & Healthcare, Jan. 1994. pp. 216-217. |
Dumay Cybersurgery Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II. Interactive Technology & Healthcare, Jan. 1994. |
Greenleaf DataGlove and Datasuit: Virtual Reality Technology Applied to the Measurement of Human Movement. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II. Interactive Technology & Healthcare, Jan. 1994, pp. 63-69. |
Burdea et al. Dextrous Telerobotics with Force Feedback—An Overview, Part 1: Human Factors Rutgers—The State University of New Jersey, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Robotica (1991) vol. 9, pp. 171-178. |
Online reference dated May 31, 1995, updates chapter 13 of the AutoCAD Release 13 Developer's Guide dated Apr. 14, 1995. |
Brochure: Dynacath Simulator Dynacath Minneapolis, MN. |
Kuhn et al. Karlsruhe Endoscopic Surgery Trainer A “Virtual Reality” based Training System for Minimally Invasive Surgery. |
Christensen Bringing Telematics Into Health Care in the European Communities Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II. Interactive Technology & Healthcare, Jan. 1994, 21-23. |
Marcus et al. Exos Research on Master Controllers for Robotic Devices NASA Technical Reports Server NTRS, pp. 238-245 Jan. 1, 1992. |
Merril VR for Medical Training and Trade Show “Fly-Pape”: Virtual Reality World, May/Jun. 1994, pp. 53-57. |
Burdea Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality Electrical and Computer-Engineering Dept. Rutgers—The State University of New Jersey. |
Baumann et al. Force Feedback for Virtual Reality Based Minimally Invasive Surgery Simulator Medicine Meets Virtual Reality IV: Health Care in the Information Age, Jan. 1996. |
Burdea Chapter 7 Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality Physical Modeling, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., pp. 168-223. |
Jason Fritz Haptic Rendering Techniques for Scientific Visualization Jason P. Fritz Thesis at University of Delaware Fall 1996. |
Marcus Hands On: Haptic Feedback in Surgical Simulation Exos Inc. 2 A Gill St. Woburn, MA. |
Rosenberg et al. A Haptic Interface for Virtual Simulation of Endoscopic Surgery Medicine Meets Virtual Reality IV: Health Care in the Information Age, Jan. 1996 pp. 371-387. |
Haritsis et al. Realistic Generation and Real Time Animation of Images of the Human Colon Computer Graphics Forum, vol. II, No. 3, pp. C367-380. |
Ho et al. IGES and PDES, The Current Status of Product Data Exchange Status Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Mo-Rolla, Rolla MO, 1988 IEEE, pp. 210-216. |
Hooper The Interactive Assembly and Computer Animation of Reconfigurable Robotic Systems Mechanical Engineering Dept. The University of Texas at Austin. 1990. |
Rosenberg Louis B. Human Interface Hardware for Virtual Laparoscopic Surgery Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Health Care Immersion Corp. Santa Clara, CA. Chapter49, pp. 322—Jan. 1995. |
Funda et al. Image-guided Command and Control of a Surgical Robot Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II. Interactive Technology & Healthcare, Jan. 1994. |
Jaramaz et al. Integrating Finite Element Analysis Into Pre-Operative Surgical Planning and Simulation of Total Joint Replacement Surgery Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II. Interactive Technology & Healthcare, Jan. 1994, pp. 34-37. |
Merck & Co. An Introduction to The Robotic Endoscopy Simulator 1989. |
Hastreiter et al. Intuitive and Interactive Manipulation of 3D Datasets by Integrating Texture Mapping Based Volume Rendering into the Open Inventor Class Hierarchy Lehrstuhl fur Graphische Datenverarbeitung (IMMD9) Universitat Erlangen. |
Issacs et al. Controlling Dynamic Simulation with Kinematic Constraints, Behavior Functions and Inverse Dynamics Computer Graphics vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 215-224. |
Filerman et al. Issues in the Design of Tactile Input Devices for Mechanical CAD Systems Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Artificial Intelligence Laboratory 1989. |
Artificial Reality with Force-feed back: Development of Desktop Virtual Space with Compact Master Manipulator Iwata Computer Graphics vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 165-170. |
Hon Ixion's Laparoscopic Surgical Skills Simulator Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II. Interactive Technology & Healthcare, Jan. 1994. |
Kilpatrick The use of a Kinesthetic Supplement in an Interactive Graphics System Xerox University Microfilms 1976. |
Kuhnapfel et al. Endosurgery Simulations with KISMET Virtual Reality World, pp. 165-171 1995. |
Immersion Corporation Laparoscopic Impulse Engine Impulse Engine 2000™ Software Development Kit (Ver. 1.0)(Immersion) Immersion Corporation—Version 1.0 Mar. 1995. |
McKensie et al. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Wessex Regional Medical Physics Service and Department of Otolaryngology, vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 619-641 1984. |
Massie et al. The Phantom Haptic Interface: A Device for Probing Virtual Objects Proceedings of the ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Chicago, IL Nov. 1994. |
McAfee et al Teleoperator Subsystem-Telerobot Demonstrator: Force Reflecting Hand Controller Equipment Manual Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, pp. 3-11. |
Poston et al. The Medical Reality Sculptor Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II. Interactive Technology & Healthcare, Jan. 1994. pp. 174-176. |
Satava Medical Virtual Reality: The Current Status of the Future Medicine Meets Virtual Reality IV: Health Care in the Information Age, Jan. 1996. |
Merril et al. Virtual Reality for Trade Shows and Individual Physician Training Virtual Reality Systems, pp. 40-44 Spring 2004. |
Metaxas et al. Dynamic Deformation of Solid Primitives with Constraints Computer Graphics Proceedings, Annual Conference Series, University of Toronto. pp. 309-312. |
Flynn Virtual Reality and Virtual Spaces Find a Niche in Real Medicine; Simulated Surgery on a Computer—This Won't Hurt. New York Times Jun. 5, 1995. |
Massimo et al. One Handed Tracking in Six Degrees of Freedom IEEE International Conference on Systems, MAN and Cybernetics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Man-Machine Systems Laboratory, vol. 1 of III. |
Hannaford et al. Performance Evaluation of a Six-Axis Generalized Force-Reflecting Teleoperator IEEE May/Jun. 1991, vol. 21, No. 3 pp. 620-633. |
Merril Presentation Material: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II. Interactive Technology & Healthcare, Jan. 1994. |
Immersion Human Interface Corporation Immersion Probe and Personal Digitizer Programmer's Technical Reference Manual: Immersion Probe and Personal Digitizer May 19, 1994. |
Durlach Psychophysical Considerations in the Design of Human-Machine Interfaces for Teleoperator and Virtual-Environment Systems Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II. Interactive Technology & Healthcare, Jan. 1994 pp. 45-47. |
Hubner et al. Real-Time Volume Visualization of Medical Image Data for Diagnostic and Navigational Purposes in Computer Aided Surgery Proc., Computer Assisted Radiology, CAR'96 Paris, pp. 751-756 Jun. 26-29, 1996. |
Merril et al. Revealing the Mysteries of the Brain with VR Virtual Reality Special Report, Winter 1994, pp. 61-65. |
Neisius et al. Robotic Telemanipulator for Laparoscopy 1995 IEEE-EMBC and CMBEC Theme 5: Neuromuscular Systems/ Biomechamics, pp. 1199-1200.1995. |
Sato et at. Space Interface Device for Artificial Reality—SPIDAR System and Computers in Japan, vol. 23, No. 12, pp. 44-54. |
Galyean et al. Sculpting: An Interactive Volumetric Modeling Technique Computer Graphics, vol. 25, No. 4. |
Medical World News Virtual Reality Shapes Surgeon's Skills Medical World News, Feb. 1994, pp. 26-27. |
Hon Tactile and Visual Simulation: A Realistic Endoscopy Experience Medicine Meets Virtual Reality: Discovering Applications for 3-D Multi-Media Interactive Technology in the Health Sciences, Jun. 4-7, 1992. |
Johnson Tactile Feedback Enhancement to Laparoscopic Tools Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II. Interactive Technology & Healthcare, Jan. 1994. |
Fischer et al. Tactile Feedback for Endoscopic Surgery Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Healthcare, Jan. 1995. |
Peine et al. A Tactile Sensing and Display System for Surgical Applications Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Healthcare, Jan. 1995 pp. 283-288. |
Computer Procedures for Finite Element Analysis Taylor Computer Procedures, The Finite Element Method, McCraw Hill, pp. 677-757 Computer Procedures for Finite Element Analysis. |
Hunter et al. Teleoperated Microsurgical Robot and Associated Virtual Environment Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II. Interactive Technology & Healthcare, Jan. 1994. |
Holler et al. Teleprescence Systems for Application in Minimally Invasive Surgery Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II. Interactive Technology & Healthcare, Jan. 1994. |
Sheridan Telerobotics Automatica vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 487-507. |
Satava Virtual Reality Surgical Simulator: The First Steps Medicine Meets Virtual Reality: Discovering Applications for 3-D Multi-Media Interactive Technology in the Health Sciences—Jun. 4-7, 1992. |
Frolich et al. The Responsive Workbench: A Virtual Working Environment for Physicians Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Healthcare, Jan. 1995, pp. 118-119. |
Doyle et al. The Virtual Embryo: VR Applications in Human Developmental Anatomy Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II: Interactive Technology & Healthcare, Jan. 1994, pp. 38-41. |
Baille Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Time for Change Scott Med J. Feb. 1989; 34 (1): 389-90. |
Song et al. Tissue Cutting in Virtual Environments Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Healthcare, Jan. 1995. |
Gyeong-Jae et al. Tissue Cutting in Virtual Environments Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Healthcare, Jan. 1995 359-364J. |
Sukthankar Towards Virtual Reality of “Tissue Squeezing”: A Feasibility Study Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II: Interactive Technology & Healthcare, Jan. 1994, pp. 182-186. |
Adachi Touch and Trace on the Free-Form Surface of Virtual Object Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium—Sep. 18-22, 1993 Seattle, WA pp. 162-168. |
Trevidi et al. Developing Sensor-Based Robotic System Using Virtual Reality Concepts Proceedings for the ANS Fifth Topical Meeting on Robotics and Robotic Systems Knoxsville, TN/Apr. 25-30, vol. 1, pp. 165-172. |
CH Products CH Products Virtual Pilot Control Yoke 1993. |
Henderson “Virtual Realities” as Instructional Technology Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, pp. 24-30. |
Hoffman Virtual Reality and the Medical Curriculum: Integrating Extant and Emerging Technologies Medicine Meets Virtual Reality II: Interactive Technology & Healthcare, Jan. 1994 pp. 73-76. |
Burdea et al. Virtual Reality Technology Chap. 6, pp. 221-242. Wiley-Interscience 2003. |
Iwata et al. Volume Haptization IEEE 1993, pp. 16-18. |
Anon. VR in Medicine VR News; Apr. 1996 vol. 5, Issue 3. |
Ota et al. Virtual Reality in Surgical Education ComputBiol Med., Mar. 1995, 25(2): 127-37. |
MacDonald et al. Virtual Reality Technology Applied to Anesthesiology Interactive Technology and the New Paradigm for Healthcare, Jan. 1995. |
Bell et al. The Virtual Reality Modeling Language, version 1.0 Specification 1996. |
Merril Why I Simulate Surgery . . . Virtual Reality World, Nov./Dec. 1994, pp. 54-57. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040253572 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |