Patent Application
20100022568
The present invention relates to the use of endothelin receptor antagonists (hereinafter ERA) for the treatment of early stage idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (hereinafter early stage IPF or early IPF).
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), also known as cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis, is a distinct clinical disorder belonging to the spectrum of interstitial lung diseases (ILD). IPF is a progressive disease characterized by the presence of a histological pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) on surgical lung biopsy. IPF was used to be considered as a chronic inflammatory disease resulting in parenchymal fibrosis. However, recent evidence suggests a mechanism of abnormal wound healing, with progressive extracellular matrix accumulation, decreased fibroblast-myoblast cell death, continuous epithelial cell apoptosis and abnormal re-epithelialization. Progressive fibrotic tissue deposition in the interstitial areas of the lung leads to decreased lung compliance and reduced gas exchanges.
The onset of symptoms is usually gradual and patients complain of non-productive cough, shortness of breath occurring first on exercise and then at rest. Cyanosis, cor pulmonale, and peripheral edema may be observed in the late phase of the disease.
In the presence of a surgical lung biopsy showing the histological appearance of UIP, the definite diagnosis of IPF requires the following (American Thoracic Society. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: diagnosis and treatment. International consensus statement. American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161:646-64):
The criteria for diagnosis of IPF in the absence of a surgical lung biopsy necessitate the correlation between all clinical and radiological features.
According to LeadDiscovery (2006), Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (hereinafter IPF) is a devastating, relentlessly progressive and lethal disease for which current therapy is minimally effective.
Precise figures for prevalence and incidence of IPF have not been reported. Prevalence was thought to be between 3 and 6 cases per 100,000 but could be as high as 13 to 20 cases per 100,000. Prevalence is higher in older adults (two-thirds of patients are over 60 years of age) and in males. The median survival after the diagnosis of biopsy-confirmed IPF is less than 3 years.
No therapies have been shown to improve survival or quality of life for patients with IPF. Current treatment is still based on the former presumption that IPF is an inflammatory process with concurrent remodeling of the lung by fibrosis. Consequently, it involves anti-inflammatory therapy, including corticosteroids, immunosuppressive/cytotoxic agents (e.g. azathioprine, cyclophosphamide) or a combination of both. However, because of the marginal benefit and serious side effects of the current therapies, along with newer insights into the pathogenesis of IPF, novel therapeutic approaches are highly needed. Antifibrotic therapy is aimed at decreasing matrix deposition or increasing collagen breakdown and a number of agents including colchicine, D-penicillamine, interferon gamma, and pirfenidone are currently under investigation. Lung transplantation has emerged as a viable option for some patients with IPF.
The neurohormone endothelin-1 (ET-1) belongs to a family of 21-amino-acid peptides released from the endothelium and is one of the most potent vasoconstrictors known. ET-1 can also promote fibrosis, cell proliferation, and remodeling, and is pro-inflammatory. ET-1 can modulate matrix production and turnover by altering the metabolism of fibroblasts to stimulate collagen synthesis or decrease interstitial collagenase production. Activation of the paracrine lung ET system has been confirmed in animal models of pulmonary fibrosis. ET-1 has also been linked to IPF in humans. In patients with IPF, ET-1 is increased in airway epithelium, and type TI pneumocytes, compared with control subjects and with patients with nonspecific fibrosis. Thus ET-1 could be a major player in the pathogenesis of IPF.
High Resolution Computer Tomography (HRCT) as well as classical computer tomography (CT) are to date together with pulmonary function tests the best non invasive tools to assess the extent of the disease and to attempt to delineate its stage of progression. Typically IPF at start of the disease will mainly show on CT scan ground-glass attenuation with little or no honeycomb. Ground-glass attenuation corresponds histologically to patchy alveolar septal fibrosis, air space filling with macrophages with interstitial inflammation. At a later stage ground-glass will be substituted by more reticular opacities and honeycomb. The latter corresponds to the destruction of the lung with dilatation of bronchioles that communicate with proximal airways. Honeycomb lesions tend to enlarge slowly over time (King Jr. T E. Idiopathic interstitial pneumonias in Interstitial Lung Disease fourth edition pages 701 786 Schwartz, King editors 2003 BC Decker Inc Hamilton-London).
Honeycomb can be semi-quantitated on HRCT at the lobe level or zones with scales from 0 to 5 or 0 to 100 with increments of 5 (Lynch D A et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005 172 488-493; Akira M, et al Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: progression of honeycombing at thin-section CT Radiology 1993 189: 687-691).
Early stage of IPF can be at best characterized by the presence of no or little honeycomb on HRCT or CT scans, as well as the presence of ground-glass in one or both lungs but not limited to these features. Early stage of IPF can be more accurately defined as IPF associated with no or low honeycomb at time of disease diagnosis. In rare cases the HRCT will not show ground-glass attenuation and/or honeycomb and/or reticulation. However, early IPF may also be diagnosed by other usual diagnostic tools but not limited to, such as magnetic resonance imaging, broncho-alveolar lavage, lung biopsy for histological assessment (e.g. surgical, transbronchial, or via mediastinoscopy).
Additionally, early IPF may also be diagnosed by cardio-pulmonary exercise test.
Despite low or no honeycomb visible on HRCT scan, honeycomb still may be seen on histological sections.
The term “low honeycomb” or “little honeycomb” means that honeycomb is present in less than 25% of the overall lung fields. In a further embodiment, the term “low honeycomb” or “little honeycomb” means that honeycomb is present in less than 10% of the overall lung fields.
According to LeadDiscovery (2006), diagnosing patients with early-stage IPF remains a great challenge.
Bosentan (Tracleer®) is an oral treatment for PAH (Class III and IV in the United States, Class III in Europe). Bosentan is a dual endothelin receptor antagonist with affinity for both endothelin ETA and ETB receptors thereby preventing the deleterious effects of ET-1. Bosentan competes with the binding of ET-1 to both ETA and ETB receptors with a slightly higher affinity for ETA receptors (Ki=4.1-43 nM) than for ETB receptors (Ki=38-730 nM).
In a clinical study (BUILD-1), the efficacy of bosentan in patients suffering from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) was evaluated in 2003. The studies did not show an effect on the primary endpoint of exercise capacity. However, bosentan showed efficacy on secondary endpoints related to death or disease worsening, providing strong rationale for Phase III mortality/morbidity study in IPF.
Full analysis of the BUILD-1 study presented at the American Thoracic Society (ATS) conference (23.05.2006) included evaluating the treatment effect of bosentan in patients who had lung biopsy (n=99) as a proof of IPF. The BUILD-1 findings in lung-biopsy proven IPF are unexpected, and warrant further clinical evaluation of bosentan in this indication. A phase III mortality and morbidity study in patients with biopsy proven IPF (BUILD-3 study) started by the end of 2006 and is currently ongoing.
WO 2004/105684 describes the use of a combination of NAC, SAPK and bosentan for IPF. However, early stage IPF is not mentioned in the publication.
WO 2005/110478 describes the use of a combination of pirfenidone or a pirfenidone analog and bosentan for IPF. Additionally, WO 2005/110478 describes the use of a combination of IFN-gamma and bosentan for IPF. However, early stage IPF is not mentioned in the publication.
Surprisingly, we found that this efficacy of bosentan was restricted to patients with early stage IPF. Thus, bosentan is useful for the treatment of early stage IPF. Further tests that have been carried out demonstrate that other ERA's are also useful for the treatment of early stage IPF.
The present invention relates to the use of an endothelin receptor antagonist, or a pharmaceutical composition comprising an endothelin receptor antagonist and either pirfenidone or interferon-gamma, for the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of early stage idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.
A further embodiment of the present invention relates to the above-described use wherein the endothelin receptor antagonist is a dual endothelin receptor antagonist or a mixed endothelin receptor antagonist.
A further embodiment of the present invention relates to the above-described use wherein the endothelin receptor antagonist is a selective endothelin receptor antagonist that binds selectively to the ETA receptor.
A further embodiment of the present invention relates to the above-described use wherein the endothelin receptor antagonist is a selective endothelin receptor antagonist that binds selectively to the ETB receptor.
A further embodiment of the present invention relates to the above-described use wherein the endothelin receptor antagonist is selected from table 1.
A further embodiment of the present invention relates to the above-described use wherein the endothelin receptor antagonist is selected from darusentan, ambrisentan, atrasentan, sitaxsentan, avosentan, TBC-3711, tezosentan, clazosentan, propyl-sulfamic acid {5-(4-bromo-phenyl)-6-[2-(5-bromo-pyrimidin-2-yloxy)-ethoxy]-pyrimidine-4-yl}-amide and bosentan.
A further embodiment of the present invention relates to the above-described use wherein the endothelin receptor antagonist is selected from darusentan, ambrisentan, sitaxsentan, avosentan, TBC-3711, propyl-sulfamic acid {5-(4-bromo-phenyl)-6-[2-(5-bromo-pyrimidin-2-yloxy)-ethoxy]-pyrimidine-4-yl}-amide and bosentan.
A further embodiment of the present invention relates to the above-described use wherein the endothelin receptor antagonist is bosentan.
A further embodiment of the present invention relates to the above-described use wherein honeycomb on HRCT or CT scans is either absent or minimal.
A further embodiment of the present invention relates to the above-described use wherein honeycomb on HRCT or CT scans is present in less than 25% of the overall lung fields.
A further embodiment of the present invention relates to the above-described use wherein honeycomb on HRCT or CT scans is present in less than 10% of the overall lung fields.
A further embodiment of the present invention relates to the above-described use wherein the ground-glass attenuation could be any percentage between above zero to 80% of lung fields.
A further embodiment of the present invention relates to the above-described use wherein bosentan is given to a patient at a daily dosage of 125 mg with or without a lower starting dose.
A further embodiment of the present invention relates to the above-described use wherein bosentan is given to a patient at a daily dosage of 250 mg with or without a lower starting dose.
The present invention relates to the use of an endothelin receptor antagonist alone or in combination with interferon-gamma (e.g. interferon gamma-1b) or pirfenidone for the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of early stage IPF.
Pirfenidone and interferon-gamma (e.g. interferon gamma-1b) can be purchased from commercial suppliers or synthesized according to methods in the art.
Early stage of IPF can be delineated as a stage of the disease at which honeycomb on HRCT or CT scans is either absent or minimal. In an embodiment of the invention the honeycomb is present in less than 10% of the overall lung fields. In a preferred embodiment the honeycomb, when expressed in a 0 to 100% scale, is present in less than 8%, or less than 5%, or less than 3%, or less than 2% of the overall lung fields. Most preferred the honeycomb is present in less than 1% of the overall lung fields. In a further embodiment the honeycomb, when expressed in a 1 to 5 scale, is present in less than a score of 3, preferably less than a score of 2, most preferred less than a score of 1.
An additional feature is the presence of ground-glass attenuation in one or both lungs fields but not limited to these features. Ground-glass extent in early IPF could be any percentage between above zero to 80%, preferably more than 2% to up to 80% of lung fields (Akira M, et al Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: progression of honeycombing at thin-section CT Radiology 1993 189: 687-691).
When IPF cannot yet with high certainty be diagnosed by clinical/radiological features expressed in the ATS/ERS consensus guidelines, typically a lung biopsy is performed to either rule out or confirm early stage IPF (reference: American Thoracic Society. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: diagnosis and treatment. International consensus statement. American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161:646-64).
Endothelin Receptor Antagonists (ERA):
Endothelin receptor antagonists, as defined above, encompass a wide range of structures and are useful alone or in the combinations and methods of the present invention. Nonlimiting examples of endothelin receptor antagonists that may be used in the present invention include those endothelin receptor antagonists as disclosed below. The endothelin receptor antagonist references identified below are incorporated herein in their entirety.
Endothelin-1 is a potent endogenous vasoconstrictor and smooth-muscle mitogen that is overexpressed in the plasma and lung tissue of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and pulmonary fibrosis. There are two classes of endothelin receptors: ETA receptors and ETB receptors, which play significantly different roles in regulating blood vessel diameter. In chronic pathological situations, the pathological effects of ET-1 can be mediated via both ETA and ETB receptors.
Two types of ERAs have been developed: dual ERAs, which block both ETA and ETB receptors, and selective ERAs, which block only ETA receptors.
Dual Endothelin Receptor Antagonist (also called mixed Endothelin Receptor Antagonist) block both the ETA and ETB receptors. Bosentan (Tracleer®) is the first FDA approved ERA (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,292, 740 or U.S. Pat. No. 5,883,254; incorporated herein in its entirety by reference thereto).
Selective ERAs bind to the ETA receptor in preference to the ETB receptor. Currently, there are selective ERAs in clinical trials, such as sitaxsentan, atrasentan, avosentan, ambrisentan (BSF 208075), and TBC3711.
The synthesis of Ambrisentan is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,932,730 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,969,134.
The synthesis of propyl-sulfamic acid {5-(4-bromo-phenyl)-6-[2-(5-bromo-pyrimidin-2-yloxy)-ethoxy]-pyrimidine-4-yl}-amide is described in WO 2002/53557.
Also included in Table 1 are the following ERA's:
Atrasentan, avosentan, tezosentan, clazosentan and propyl-sulfamic acid {5-(4-bromo-phenyl)-6-[2-(5-bromo-pyrimidin-2-yloxy)-ethoxy]-pyrimidine-4-yl}-amide.
The amount of endothelin receptor antagonist that is administered and the dosage regimen for the methods of this invention also depend on a variety of factors, including the age, weight, sex and medical condition of the subject, the severity of the pathological condition, the route and frequency of administration, and the particular endothelin receptor antagonist employed, and thus may vary widely. A daily dose administered to a subject of about 0.001 to 100 mg/kg body weight, or between about 0.005 and about 60 mg/kg body weight, or between about 0.01 and about 50 mg/kg body weight, or between about 0.015 and about 15 mg/kg body weight, or between about 0.05 and about 30 mg/kg body weight, or between about 0.075 to 7.5 mg/kg body weight, or between about 0.1 to 20 mg/kg body weight, or between about 0.15 to 3 mg/kg body weight, may be appropriate.
The amount of endothelin receptor antagonist that is administered to a human subject typically will range from about 0.1 to 2400 mg, or from about 0.5 to 2000 mg, or from about 0.75 to 1000 mg, or from about 1 mg to 1000 mg, or from about 1.0 to 600 mg, or from about 5 mg to 500 mg, or from about 5.0 to 300 mg, or from about 10 mg to 200 mg, or from about 10.0 to 100 mg. The daily dose can be administered in one to six doses per day.
In a preferred embodiment, bosentan is administered at a daily dose to a subject of about 62.5 mg twice a day, or 125 mg twice a day to adult patients.
The endothelin receptor antagonists and their pharmaceutically usable salts can be used as medicament (e.g. in the form of pharmaceutical preparations). The pharmaceutical preparations can be administered internally, such as orally (e.g. in the form of tablets, coated tablets, dragees, hard and soft gelatine capsules, solutions, emulsions or suspensions), inhalations, nasally (e.g. in the form of nasal sprays) or rectally (e.g. in the form of suppositories). However, the administration can also be effected parenterally, such as intramuscularly or intravenously (e.g. in the form of injection solutions).
The endothelin receptor antagonists and their pharmaceutically usable salts can be processed with pharmaceutically inert, inorganic or organic adjuvants for the production of tablets, coated tablets, dragees, and hard gelatine capsules. Lactose, corn starch or derivatives thereof, talc, stearic acid or its salts etc. can be used, for example, as such adjuvants for tablets, dragees, and hard gelatine capsules.
Suitable adjuvants for soft gelatine capsules, are, for example, vegetable oils, waxes, fats, semi-solid substances and liquid polyols, etc. Suitable adjuvants for the production of solutions and syrups are, for example, water, polyols, saccharose, invert sugar, glucose, etc.
Suitable adjuvants for injection solutions are, for example, water, alcohols, polyols, glycerol, vegetable oils.
Suitable adjuvants for suppositories are, for example, natural or hardened oils, waxes, fats, semi-solid or liquid polyols.
Moreover, the pharmaceutical preparations can contain preservatives, solubilizers, viscosity-increasing substances, stabilizers, wetting agents, emulsifiers, sweeteners, colorants, flavorants, salts for varying the osmotic pressure, buffers, masking agents or antioxidants. They can also contain still other therapeutically valuable substances.
Experimental Section/Biology:
The findings with bosentan can be extrapolated to other endothelin receptor antagonists as mentioned above, because endothelin-1 (ET-1) has been shown to play a central role in the development of fibrosis and therefore drugs used to target and inhibit the action of ET-1 will be effective in treating early fibrosis.
Indeed, at a whole body level, transgenic mice overexpressing ET-1 develop a phenotype of fibrosis (pulmonary and renal). This fibrosis is a direct consequence of ET-1 action, because there is no associated increase in blood pressure (1, 2). At a cellular and biochemical level also, endothelin is a central mediator of fibrosis (3). ET-1 induces chemotaxis and proliferation of fibroblasts, increases the synthesis and production of various extracellular matrix proteins like laminin, collagen, and fibronectin, while inhibiting collagenase activity. ET-1 also induces expression of other profibrotic factors, such as connective tissue growth factor and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β). ET-1 also increases the pro-inflammatory effector, nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB). In a rat lung model of fibrosis (bleomycin-induced) there was an elevation of ET-1 levels prior to an increase in collagen content which, along with its localization within developing fibrotic lesions, provides further evidence of a pro-fibrotic role for ET-1 at an early stage in the pathogenesis of bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis (20).
Bosentan, by antagonizing the profibrotic properties of ET-1, prevents initiation of fibrosis (3). Bosentan in cell cultures decreases collagen synthesis, increases collagenase expression, inhibits extracellular matrix deposition (4) and reduces NF-κB expression (5). Consequently bosentan in vivo is a potent anti-fibrotic agent in various animal models of fibrosis (6-11).
Since ET-1 is a central player of fibrosis, the findings with bosentan can be extrapolated to all other antagonists of endothelin receptors. For example, in cell cultures, bosentan and another endothelin receptor antagonist, PD 156707, attenuated fibroblast proliferation induced by ET-1 in human fibroblasts (12), increased matrix metalloprotease-1 (collagenase) production (4), and reduced the ability to contract a collagen matrix (13). Another endothelin receptor antagonist, BQ-123, decreased fibronectin synthesis induced by ET-1 or angiotensin II in rat mesangial cells (14). Another antagonist, PED-3512-PI, increased collagenase activity induced by ET-1 and ET-3 in rat cardiac fibroblasts (15).
In in vivo models of fibrosis, the endothelin receptor antagonist FR1 39317 attenuated the expression of collagen, laminin and TGF-β mRNA in diabetic rat kidney (16). Darusentan decreased the accumulation of collagen in norepinephrine -induced aortic remodeling and fibrosis (17). Other endothelin receptor antagonists decreased cardiac fibrosis in heart failure and hypertension models (18, 19).
Experimental Setup for the Evaluation of the Antifibrotic Properties of Bosentan and of other Endothelin Receptor Antagonists
Experiments were performed on the mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line Swiss 3T3 (Deutsche Sammlung fur Mikroorganismen und Zellen, DSMZ ACC 173). Cells were starved for 24 h in serum-free medium or medium containing 0.5% serum followed by a 24 h incubation with endothelin-1 at a concentration giving approximately 50% or preferably 80% of its maximal efficacy, in presence either of vehicle or of an antagonist at increasing concentrations or an antagonist in combination with Pirfenidone.
Potential cytotoxic effects are excluded by assessing fibroblast proliferation using the MTS reagent (21). Collagen neo-synthesis by fibroblasts is assessed by measuring 3H-proline incorporation (22).
Several endothelin receptor antagonists have been tested according to the above-mentioned experimental method.
In this cell culture model of early fibrosis using Swiss 3T3 mouse embryonic fibroblasts, the concentration-dependent effect of ET-1 on collagen neo-synthesis was measured, and yielded an EC50 (concentration of ET-1 giving 50% of maximal effect) of 0.24 nM. Using a concentration of ET-1 of 1 nM (EC80), the below mentioned endothelin receptor antagonists were analyzed for antagonistic activity on ET-1-induced collagen neo-synthesis.
We conclude that all tested antagonists fully antagonize ET-1 -induced collagen neo-synthesis to baseline values, with IC50 values ranging from 59 nM to 369 nM.
Next, the combination of pirfenidone (Sigma P-2116) and bosentan in antagonizing ET-1-induced collagen neo-synthesis was tested. To this end, fibroblasts were treated with either vehicle, bosentan (1 μM), pirfenidone (1 mM) or a combination of bosentan and pirfenidone for 24 h followed by the determination of collagen neo-synthesis.
The results show that 1 μM bosentan alone reverses ET-1 -induced collagen synthesis to baseline while pirfenidone alone has a 55% inhibitory effect on collagen neo-synthesis. Combination of both compounds has an additive effect on collagen neo-synthesis leading to a 33% drop below the value of baseline synthesis.
Clinical Evidence
BUILD 1 study was a multicentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II/III study in IPF patients. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that bosentan improves the exercise capacity of patients with IPF as assessed by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance. The secondary objectives of the study were to demonstrate that bosentan delays time to death or treatment failure, improves pulmonary function tests (PFTs), dyspnea and quality of life and is safe and well tolerated in this patient population. Treatment failure was defined either as worsening of PFTs or the occurrence of an acute decompensation of IPF. PFT worsening was defined as 2 out of the following 3 criteria
Main inclusion criteria: proven IPF diagnosis <3 years duration, either via a surgical lung biopsy or when not done according to the ATS/ERS consensus criteria (see above). The main inclusion criteria were the presence of FVC ≧50% of predicted value and DLCO ≧30% of predicted value.
A total of 158 patients were randomly allocated to treatment with bosentan (n=74) or placebo (n=84). Overall, 154 randomized patients received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid post baseline value for the primary endpoint (n=71 on bosentan, n=83 on placebo). Following a screening period (≦4 weeks), eligible patients were randomized to either bosentan or placebo (1:1), started on oral bosentan 62.5 mg b.i.d. or matching placebo, and up-titrated at Week 4 to achieve the target dose (125 mg b.i.d. or matching placebo) for the remainder of the treatment Period unless down-titrated for reasons of tolerability. The planned treatment period 1 was 12 months. Patients were evaluated at regular interval up to End-of-Period 1 (Month 12 months) and up to the End-of-Study i.e. when the last patient has his/her last visit. The 6MWT and pulmonary function tests were evaluated at each visit.
The All-Treated set of patients included 154 randomized patients who had received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one valid post baseline value for the primary endpoint (n=71 on bosentan, n=83 on placebo). The treatment groups were generally well matched with regard to demographics and baseline disease characteristics.
Although bosentan did not show improvement in the primary endpoint of the 6MWT at the End-of-Period 1, BUILD-1 showed a positive and clinically relevant trend for the efficacy of bosentan in prevention of clinical worsening. The most important clinical finding was a trend for a treatment effect on the PFT score defined as either the occurrence of death or treatment failure (worsening of PFTs or acute respiratory decompensation) at the End-of-Period 1, which was a pre-defined secondary endpoint, (22.5% in the bosentan group compared to 36.1%, in the placebo group corresponding to a relative risk ratio of 0.62, p=0.0784). PFT scoring was mainly driven by the change in FVC and DLCO.
Post hoc subpopulation analyses were undertaken to determine which population would best show a treatment effect on PFT scores. Age, gender, site location, baseline walk tests or pulmonary function tests were not predictive of any particular treatment effect with bosentan. Surprisingly, as can be seen in Table 3, the 99 patients who had a surgical lung biopsy to establish the IPF diagnosis showed a dramatic statistically significant treatment effect with a relative risk ratio of 0.32, (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14-0.74).
In contrast, the 58 patients who were diagnosed without a surgical lung biopsy (SLB) showed no treatment effect (relative risk ratio of 1.36, 95% CI 0.70-2.65). Whether this observation was simply due to a chance finding could only be determined by comparing the baseline characteristics of those 2 subgroups of patients.
As seen on Table 4 the only obvious difference was that the non-SLB patients were older than the SLB patients. There were no parameters of the lung function tests suggesting that one group had a more advanced disease than the other.
As seen on Table 5 the only obvious difference was that the non-SLB patients were older than the SLB patients. The lung function tests were well balanced between the 2 groups.
The only remaining logical explanation was that these 2 groups differed in their HRCT at presentation. Before undertaking a central reading of all available CTs, the following hypothesis was built.
Three possible explanations were tested why patients with SLBs would have had a better treatment effect than those without:
Extent of honeycombing in IPF is a predictor of non-response to treatment.
Extent of ground-glass abnormality is a predictor of response to treatment
The analyses were run by a single radiologist who was blinded to the group allocation. Each patient CT was scored for honeycomb as well as ground-glass from the 3 zones of each lung namely upper mid and lower zone. Increment for HC and ground-glass was rounded to the upper 5%.
Then we looked at the scoring of honeycombing (HC) vs. the treatment effect.
In conclusion, the analysis of the BUILD 1 data demonstrates that the dual endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan is mainly effective in the prevention of clinical worsening in IPF patients with early disease with low or no honeycomb on HRCT lung scans.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/IB2006/051170 | Apr 2006 | IB | international |
| PCT/IB2006/051610 | May 2006 | IB | international |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/IB07/51328 | 4/12/2007 | WO | 00 | 10/10/2008 |
