This invention relates to the treatment of body lumens and, more particularly, to the endovascular placement of a prosthetic graft within vasculature for the purpose of repairing the same.
Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are a leading cause of death in the United States. Treatment options to repair AAA include conventional open surgery and implantation of an endovascular graft. Conventional open surgical repair of AAA involves major abdominal surgery with associated high rates of morbidity. Endovascular grafts have been developed to endoluminally bypass abdominal aortic aneurysms through minimally invasive surgery. Many patients that are unacceptable surgical risks for open repairs are eligible for endovascular graft implantation. Deployment of transfemoral, endovascular grafts to treat AAA is appealing for many reasons: avoidance of an abdominal incision, lack of aortic cross clamping, the potential for regional anesthesia, and a shortened hospital stay.
Untreated AAA have been shown to continue to expand until rupture, with an associated high mortality rate. Implantation of endovascular grafts have also been associated with high complication rates, including perioperative death, conversion to open repair, the need for further intervention, the need for hemodialysis, a failure to cure the AAA, and wound complications.
The inability to obtain or maintain a secure seal between the vessel wall and the endovascular graft is a complication unique to endovascular aneurysm exclusion. Because the term “leak” has been associated with aneurysm rupture following conventional surgery, the term “endoleak” has been proposed as a more definitive description of this complication. It is believed that persistent endoleaks result in continued aneurysm expansion, which may eventually lead to aneurysm rupture. Aneurysms that have been successfully excluded have shown a tendency towards a reduction in aneurysm diameter. Failure to properly exclude the aneurysm from systemic arterial blood pressure keeps the patient at risk of impending rupture. Endoleaks have been classified according to the source of the leaks. Current classifications of endoleaks include four categories. Type I endoleaks are “perigraft” or “graft-related” leaks that involve a persistent channel of blood flow due to inadequate or ineffective sealing at the ends of the endovascular graft, or between overlapping components of a modular system. Type II endoleaks are retrograde flow into the aneurysm sac from patent lumbar arteries, the inferior mesenteric artery, or other collateral vessels. Type III endoleaks result from fabric tears, graft disconnection, or graft disintegration. Finally, Type IV endoleaks are flow through the graft fabric associated with graft wall porosity or permeability. It has been recognized that preoperative patent side branches are not a good predictor of postoperative endoleaks.
There have been a number of reported cases of aneurysm rupture following implantation of an endovascular graft. Some of the ruptures occurred in patients without a documented endoleak.
A number of studies have focused on measurement of pressure within the aneurysm sac following implantation of an endovascular graft, both in the human patient, an animal model, or an in vitro model. Properly implanted endovascular grafts have been shown to reduce the pressure within the aneurysm sac while an endoleak, with or without detectable blood flow, continues to pressurize the sac at pressures equivalent to the systemic arterial pressure. Animal studies utilizing a predictable rupturing aneurysm model have shown that non-excluded aneurysms will rupture. Thrombosed aneurysm sacs may still receive pressurization from a sealed endoleak and this continued pressurization keeps the aneurysm at risk for rupture.
Current methods of patient follow-up include arteriography, contrast-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT), duplex ultrasonography, abdominal X-ray, and intravascular ultrasound. All of these methods are costly and involve invasive procedures with associated morbidity that may need to be performed in a hospital. None of the imaging methods are completely successful in detecting endoleaks. Therefore, the potential exists for an endoleak to go undetected until eventual rupture. An increase in aneurysm diameter is detectable, and should be considered an indication of endoleak. To avoid aneurysm rupture an increase in aneurysm diameter must be detected in a timely fashion to identify patients in need of corrective endovascular procedures.
An endovascular graft with the ability to measure pressure within the aneurysm sac and provide feedback to the physician could provide acute confirmation of a procedure and identify those patients with persistent pressurization of their aneurysm, and subsequent risk of rupture. Some physicians are advocating that the follow-up examinations of AAA patients focus on pressure measurements, but that this is not currently clinically feasible. Furthermore, follow-up examinations may be performed in the physician's office as opposed to a hospital. Moreover, clinicians will have a new method to study the pathology of post-endovascularly treated AAA disease.
Accordingly, there exists a need for an endovascular graft that facilitates non-invasive measurement of pressure, as well as other pertinent parameters, within the aneurysm sac and along the endovascular graft itself as a means for confirming the success of a procedure as well as identifying patients at risk for aneurysm rupture after the endovascular graft is implanted.
However, providing devices on an endovascular graft to facilitate the measurement of pertinent parameters poses problems. The measurement device increases bulk, which can significantly effect the delivery profile of the endovascular graft and increase the force necessary to deploy the device, such as jacket or release wire retraction forces. Increased bulk is a significant issue for an endovascular graft. Furthermore, attachment of measurement devices to an endovascular graft may require sutures and the suture knots not only provide increased bulk, but are also potential graft wear points. Additionally, tissue growth around a measuring device attached to an implanted endovascular graft may interfere with its function and inaccurate data may result. The present invention addresses these problems and other needs.
Briefly and in general terms, the present invention is embodied in an endovascular graft with sensors attached thereto. The endovascular graft has the ability to be delivered endovascularly and measure pertinent parameters within the lumen in which it is implanted. The endovascular graft has the ability to transmit data about intra-lumen parameters to an external monitoring device. Confirmation of a successful implant procedure is quickly and easily obtained. Patient follow-up is less costly (conducted in the physician office), non-invasive, and more accurate, allowing prompt intervention in those patients most at risk for acute AAA rupture. The invention would also allow for more frequent patient follow-up, increasing the potential to diagnose and treat aneurysms at risk before acute rupture.
In one aspect of the invention, a modular endovascular graft having a main body component and one or more limb components is provided. One or more sensors are attached to the limb component(s). By attaching at least one sensor near the superior end of the limb component and sizing the main body component such that the sensor is adjacent to the aneurysm sac when the endovascular graft is implanted, measurement of pertinent parameters within the aneurysm sac is facilitated. The meaning of the term “adjacent” as used herein encompasses the sensor being located within the aneurysm sac or at a location where the parameters or properties being detected indicate conditions within the aneurysm sac. Measurements of pertinent parameters within the aneurysm sac may allow early confirmation of a successful procedure and identification of areas of the patient's vasculature at risk for aneurysm rupture, thrombus formation, infection, inflammation or other anomalies without the need for invasive procedures.
An antenna or other data transmitter and a power source also may be attached to the limb component adjacent to the aneurysm sac, allowing a physician or technician to monitor graft and vessel health without the need for an invasive procedure. The transmitter transmits measurements made by the sensors to a receiver located outside the patient's body. With the main body component unencumbered with sensors, transmitters or power sources, the bulk of the main body component is minimized and thereby, catheter diameter, jacket retraction and deployment complications are kept to a minimum.
In another aspect of the invention, an endovascular graft is provided that has attached thereto at least one integrated sensor/transmitter device capable of measuring a pertinent parameter and transmitting the measurements to an external monitoring device. Although having more bulk than a sensor, the integrated sensor/transmitter device has less total bulk than a sensor and independent transmitter device, thereby facilitating less total bulk for the endovascular graft.
Furthermore, the integrated sensor/transmitter device may be designed to allow one or more “satellite” sensors, having no function other than measurement, to be connected thereto. A single integrated sensor/transmitter device and smaller “satellite” sensors facilitate a smaller total bulk than multiple integrated sensor/transmitter devices. Attaching the integrated sensor/transmitter at a central location such as the graft crotch and “satellite” sensors at various locations on the endovascular graft facilitates measurement and transmission to an external monitoring device of pertinent parameters at multiple locations along the endovascular graft and within the lumen. The “satellite” sensors allow a complete profile of pertinent parameters to be obtained and may provide more accurate identification of anomalies. Measurement of pertinent parameters at multiple locations along the endovascular graft or within the aneurysm sac may allow early detection of a defective seal between endovascular graft components, graft wear or changes in aneurysm geometry. The smaller “satellite” sensors may also allow pertinent parameters to be measured from locations on the endovascular graft where local graft bulk is a constraint of the design, such as the graft contra limb or near the superior attachment system that holds the graft in the patient's aorta.
Additionally, it is contemplated that “satellite” sensors may be attached directly to the lumen of a patient. The integrated sensor/transmitter device also may be attached directly to the lumen or attached to an implanted endovascular graft.
Moreover, it is contemplated that passive devices, or monuments, which perform no sensing function may be attached to the implanted endovascular graft or directly attached to the aneurysm sac. By tracking the location of the monuments with a monitoring device, changes in the position of the endovascular graft within the lumen or changes in the geometry of the tissue outside the endovascular graft may be detected without the problems of encapsulation or thrombus isolation associated with the measurement of pertinent parameters. Such changes may provide early detection of endovascular graft displacement or aneurysm re-dilation due to an endoleak.
Sensors with pressure measurement capability may be used to detect pressure changes in the aneurysm sac indicative of graft failure or endoleak due to an inadequate seal between the endovascular graft and the vasculature. Sensors with temperature measurement capability may be used to detect temperature differentials associated with “hot spots” related to inflammation, infection or thrombus formation in the vessel. Sensors with the capability to measure oxygen and other blood constituents such as enzymes, proteins, and nutrients, may be used to detect minute blood flow indicative of endoleak. Sensors with the capability to measure electrical potential or magnetic fields may be used to detect differences in potential associated with areas of the vessel at risk for thrombus formation. Sensors also may be provided to facilitate other sensing applications such as blood oxymetry, blood glucose, blood or fluid flow, biochemical or hormonal balance, blood chemistry, positional data, dynamic displacement data, ocular pressure, respiration, electro physiology, tissue stress, venous return and body acoustics.
In yet another aspect of the invention, sensors are attached to an endovascular graft using one continuous suture. Starting at one location on the sensor, a running stitch around the sensor is used to attach the sensor to the graft fabric, thereby minimizing the number of knots necessary for attachment, in this case a single knot. It is contemplated that the running stitch may start at any location on the sensor depending on the location of the sensor on the endovascular graft. Minimizing the number of knots is advantageous because knots are potential graft wear points and add bulk. Additionally, a single knot attachment design may allow the sensor to be placed close to the graft crotch due to the lack of a knot at the end closest the crotch.
In an additional aspect of the invention, the sensors may be covered in a coating that either inhibits tissue growth or promotes a known or controlled amount and/or type of tissue growth. Because tissue growth may interfere with the ability of a sensor to perform its measurement function, inhibiting tissue growth or restricting tissue growth to a known type and/or amount may increase the reliability of measurements obtained.
The invention is applicable to all applications of endovascular grafts to treat aneurysmal segments of blood vessels. Furthermore, the invention and methods disclosed herein may be applied any time it is desired to measure intra-luminal parameters in a non-invasive manner. It is contemplated that the invention may be used with all shapes of endovascular grafts known within the art.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate, by way of example, the principles of the invention.
As shown in the exemplary drawings and for purposes of illustration, the invention is embodied in a prosthetic endovascular graft having the ability to measure pertinent parameters inside the lumen into which it is implanted and transmit the measurements to a receiver located external to the patient.
Referring to
The sensors 16 measure pertinent parameters outside the endovascular graft 10 and the power source 14 provides power for the transmitter 12 which transmits the measurements to a receiver (not shown) located outside the patient's body. The transmitter 12, power source 14 and receiver (not shown) may be of any type known in the art of surgical implants or other systems utilizing miniaturized power sources and transmitters. The power source 14 and transmitter 12, for example, may be of the type used in pacemaker technology or passive power sources such as ultrasonic chargeable capacitors.
One or more sensors 16 are located near the superior end 32 of the limb component 30 but inferior the attachment/sealing area 26 between the trunk component 20 and limb component 30 such that the seal between the trunk component 20 and limb component 30 is not jeopardized. Note that the attachment/sealing area 26 is such that one or more of the sensors 16 on the limb component 30 is adjacent the aneurysm sac 42, thereby facilitating measurement of pertinent parameters within the aneurysm sac 42 without encumbering the trunk component 20 with sensors 16. Note also that the transmitter 12 and power source 14 are attached to the limb component 30 such that they are also adjacent the aneurysm sac 42. Minimizing the bulk of the trunk component facilitates a smaller delivery profile for the endovascular graft 10.
The sensors 16 may measure pressure, with the measurements used as an aid in endovascular graft 10 placement or to identify anomalies that occur after endovascular graft 10 implantation but before aneurysm rupture occurs. The sensors 16 may detect changes in pressure resulting from blood leakage between the endovascular graft 10 and the vessel wall 40, an endoleak resulting from an inadequate seal between them. Furthermore, the sensors 16 may detect changes in pressure resulting from leakage from an endoleak between the trunk 20 and vessel wall 40. Because sensors 16 are located in the area of the aneurysm sac 42, there may be multiple sensors 16 disbursed over the graft material outer wall since local thrombus or calcification may shield one or more of the sensors 16 from blood flow and render their measurements erroneous. Moreover, the sensors 16 may allow pressure differences throughout the “excluded” aneurysm sac 42 to be mapped. It is contemplated that pressure measurements in the aneurysm sac may be obtained to an accuracy range of +/−1 to 30 mm Hg and preferably of +/−10 mm Hg.
Alternatively, the sensors 16 may measure temperature. Differences in temperature may identify “hot spots” associated with infection, inflammation, thrombus formation or other anomalies that indicate an increased risk for aneurysm rupture. Methods known in the art of pathology and physiology may be used to relate temperature to changes in the vessel walls within which the endovascular graft is implanted.
Alternatively, the sensors 16 may detect blood flow by measuring oxygen or other constituents, such as enzymes, proteins and nutrients, which are altered by the presence of blood flow. Such sensors may allow detection of minute blood flow, often missed by conventional imaging modalities, and, therefore, allow endoleaks to be detected earlier. One method is to obtain a baseline of the constituents upon implantation of the endovascular graft. Thereafter, changes in the amount of the measured constituents may be used to identify anomalies.
Alternatively, the sensors 16 may measure electrical potential or magnetic field strength. Changes in electrical potential may identify areas of the patient's vasculature that are at risk for thrombus formation. Induced magnetic fields indicate motion at a charged portion of the aneurysm such as would occur from pulsatile pressure.
Sensors also may be provided to facilitate other sensing applications such as blood oxymetry, blood glucose, blood or fluid flow, biochemical or hormonal balance, blood chemistry, positional data, dynamic displacement data, ocular pressure, respiration, electro physiology, tissue stress, venous return and body acoustics.
Although shown external the limb component 30 in
Referring to
Because the “satellite” sensors 52 are smaller than the integrated sensor/transmitter 50, the overall bulk of the endovascular graft 110 is smaller than if multiple integrated sensor/transmitter devices 50 were utilized. Furthermore, the smaller “satellite” sensors 52 may be placed such that measurements may be obtained from multiple locations, such as near the superior attachment area or within the aneurysm sac 42. Moreover, the smaller “satellite” sensors 52 facilitate measurements from places on the endovascular graft 110 where local graft bulk is a constraint of the design, such as the contra limb, or near the superior attachment system that holds the graft in the patient's aorta.
A separate power source 114 may be provided. The power source can be integrated into the sensor/transmitter as described previously and further below. The leads 54 which connect the integrated sensor/transmitter 50 to the “satellite” sensors 52 may be woven into the graft fabric or attached external to the endovascular graft 110.
It is contemplated that the location and number of integrated sensor/transmitter devices 50, power sources 114 and “satellite” sensors 52 shown in
Moreover, the integrated sensor/transmitter 50 and “satellite” sensors 52 may be of any type known in the art used to measure pressure, temperature, oxygen and other blood constituents, electrical potential or any other pertinent parameter indicative of endovascular graft or lumen health. One such integrated sensor/transmitter 50 to measure pressure is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Application Publication No. 2002/0045921 (Wolinsky et al.), the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. Again, other sensing applications may be supported such as blood oxymetry, blood glucose, blood or fluid flow, biochemical or hormonal balance, blood chemistry, positional data, dynamic displacement data, ocular pressure, respiration, electro physiology, tissue stress, venous return and body acoustics.
Although
In an alternate embodiment of the invention illustrated in
In a further embodiment of the invention illustrated in
In one example, the position of magnetic sensors attached to the aneurysm sac 42 are measured using an external magnet of known magnetic field strength and shape. By moving the external magnet to multiple positions and orientations outside the body and polling the magnetic sensors with ultrasound, a baseline of magnetic sensor positions is established. Subsequent polling of the magnetic sensor positions allows changes in aneurysm sac 42 geometry to be detected.
In yet another embodiment of the invention shown in
In yet another embodiment of the invention, the sensors 16 may be covered in a coating, such as Teflon or heparin, to inhibit tissue growth or covered in a coating, such as Thrombin, to promote a known or controlled amount of tissue growth. Inhibiting or controlling tissue growth, which may interfere with performance, increases the reliability of the measurements made by the sensors 16.
While several particular forms of the invention have been illustrated and described, it will be apparent that various modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is not intended that the invention be limited, except as by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2634721 | Greenwood, Jr. | May 1951 | A |
3240207 | Barker et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3888708 | Wise et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
4732874 | Sparks | Mar 1988 | A |
4815472 | Wise et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4834101 | Collison et al. | May 1989 | A |
4846191 | Brockway et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4881410 | Wise et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4946562 | Guruswamy | Aug 1990 | A |
4953387 | Johnson | Sep 1990 | A |
5000049 | Cooper et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5013396 | Wise et al. | May 1991 | A |
5055838 | Wise et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5059543 | Wise et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5100479 | Wise et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5113868 | Wise et al. | May 1992 | A |
5165407 | Wilson et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5207103 | Wise et al. | May 1993 | A |
5213999 | Sparks et al. | May 1993 | A |
5250461 | Sparks | Oct 1993 | A |
5250837 | Sparks | Oct 1993 | A |
5262127 | Wise et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5296255 | Gland et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5314458 | Najafi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5343064 | Spangler et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5377524 | Wise et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5385709 | Wise et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5411551 | Winston et al. | May 1995 | A |
5417235 | Wise et al. | May 1995 | A |
5427975 | Sparks et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5531121 | Sparks et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5547093 | Sparks | Aug 1996 | A |
5567989 | Sim | Oct 1996 | A |
5598847 | Renger | Feb 1997 | A |
5653743 | Martin | Aug 1997 | A |
5663508 | Sparks | Sep 1997 | A |
5676696 | Marcade | Oct 1997 | A |
5683449 | Marcade | Nov 1997 | A |
5706565 | Sparks et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5719069 | Sparks | Feb 1998 | A |
5735887 | Barreras, Sr. et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5756900 | Arie et al. | May 1998 | A |
5807258 | Cimochowski | Sep 1998 | A |
5831162 | Sparks et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5915281 | Sparks | Jun 1999 | A |
5929497 | Chavan et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5932809 | Sparks et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5936164 | Sparks et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5967986 | Cimochowski | Oct 1999 | A |
5967989 | Cimochowski et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976994 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5989445 | Wise et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5992769 | Wise et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6015387 | Schwartz et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6022756 | Sparks et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035714 | Yazdi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6053873 | Govari et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6062461 | Sparks et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077298 | Tu et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6092530 | Weissman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6109113 | Chavan et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6136212 | Mastrangelo et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140144 | Najafi et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140740 | Porat et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6159156 | Van Bockel | Dec 2000 | A |
6167757 | Yazdi et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6169321 | Nguyen et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6170488 | Spillman, Jr. et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171253 | Bullister et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6198965 | Penner et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206835 | Spillman, Jr. et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206914 | Soykan et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6231516 | Keilman et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232150 | Lin et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6237398 | Porat et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239724 | Doron et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6286369 | Yazdi et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6300632 | Liu et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331163 | Kaplan | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6416474 | Penner | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442413 | Silver | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6475170 | Doron et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6477426 | Fenn et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486588 | Doron et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6610096 | MacDonald | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6616624 | Kieval | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6840956 | Wolinsky et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
7025778 | Hayashi et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
20020045804 | Christopherson et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045921 | Wolinsky et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020183628 | Reich et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020188207 | Richter | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004562 | DiCarlo | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030229388 | Hayashi et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050171512 | Flaherty | Aug 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0149693 | Jan 1984 | EP |
0 646 365 | Apr 1995 | EP |
0 897 690 | Feb 1999 | EP |
1132044 | Sep 2001 | EP |
WO8303348 | Oct 1983 | WO |
WO9829030 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO9926530 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO9942039 | Aug 1999 | WO |
WO 0032092 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0136014 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 03103539 | Dec 2003 | WO |