Endovascular support device and method

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6827733
  • Patent Number
    6,827,733
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, September 24, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 7, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
An endovascular support device for treatment of chronic restenosis or other vascular narrowing is disclosed together with a method of manufacture and a method for delivering a plurality of such devices to an affected area of a vessel. In a preferred embodiment, the endovascular support device comprises a unitary wire-like structure configured to form a plurality of upper and lower peaks which may be compressed for delivery to an affected area of a coronary or peripheral vessel in a human, and then expanded to maintain a passageway through the vessel.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates generally to medical devices, and particularly relates to implantable devices for treating narrowing of coronary or peripheral vessels in humans.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Cardiovascular disease, including atherosclerosis, is the leading cause of death in the U.S. The medical community has developed a number of methods for treating coronary heart disease, some of which are specifically designed to treat the complications resulting from atherosclerosis and other forms of coronary arterial narrowing.




The most impelling development in the past decade for treating atherosclerosis and other forms of coronary narrowing is percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, hereinafter referred to simply as “angioplasty” or “PTCA”. The objective in angioplasty is to enlarge the lumen of the affected coronary artery by radial hydraulic expansion. The procedure is accomplished by inflating a balloon within the narrowed lumen of the coronary artery. Radial expansion of the coronary artery occurs in several different dimensions and is related to the nature of the plaque. Soft, fatty plaque deposits are flattened by the balloon and hardened deposits are cracked and split to enlarge the lumen. The wall of the artery itself is also stretched when the balloon is inflated.




PTCA is performed as follows: A thin-walled, hollow guiding catheter is typically introduced into the body via a relatively large vessel, such as the femoral artery in the groin area or the brachial artery in the arm. Access to the femoral artery is achieved by introducing a large bore needle directly into the femoral artery, a procedure known as the Seldinger Technique. Once access to the femoral artery is achieved, a short hollow sheath is inserted to maintain a passageway during PTCA. The flexible guiding catheter, which is typically polymer coated, and lined with Teflon, is inserted through the sheath into the femoral artery. The guiding catheter is advanced through the femoral artery into the iliac artery and into the ascending aorta. Further advancement of the flexible catheter involves the negotiation of an approximately 180 degree turn through the aortic arch to allow the guiding catheter to descend into the aortic cusp where entry may be gained to either the left or the right coronary artery, as desired.




After the guiding catheter is advanced to the ostium of the coronary artery to be treated by PTCA, a flexible guidewire is inserted into the guiding catheter through a balloon and advanced to the area to be treated. The guidewire provides the necessary steerability for lesion passage. The guidewire is advanced across the lesion, or “wires” the lesion, in preparation for the advancement of a polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, polyolefin, or other suitable substance balloon catheter across the guide wire. The balloon, or dilatation, catheter is placed into position by sliding it along the guide wire. The use of the relatively rigid guide wire is necessary to advance the catheter through the narrowed lumen of the artery and to direct the balloon, which is typically quite flexible, across the lesion. Radiopaque markers in the balloon segment of the catheter facilitate positioning across the lesion. The balloon catheter is then inflated with contrast material to permit fluoroscopic viewing during treatment. The balloon is alternately inflated and deflated until the lumen of the artery is satisfactorily enlarged.




Unfortunately, while the affected artery can be enlarged, in some instances the vessel restenoses chronically, or closes down acutely, negating the positive effect of the angioplasty procedure. In the past, such restenosis has frequently necessitated repeat PTCA or open heart surgery. While such restenosis does not occur in the majority of cases, it occurs frequently enough that such complications comprise a significant percentage of the overall failures of the PTCA procedure, for example, twenty-five to thirty-five percent of such failures.




To lessen the risk of restenosis, various devices have been proposed for mechanically keeping the affected vessel open after completion of the angioplasty procedure. Such mechanical endoprosthetic devices, which are generally referred to as stents, are typically inserted into the vessel, positioned across the lesion, and then expanded to keep the passageway clear. Effectively, the stent overcomes the natural tendency of the vessel walls of some patients to close back down, thereby maintaining a more normal flow of blood through that vessel than would be possible if the stent were not in place.




Various types of stents have been proposed, although to date none has proven satisfactory. One proposed stent involves a tube of stainless wire braid. During insertion, the tube is positioned along a delivery device, such as a catheter, in extended form, making the tube diameter as small as possible. When the stent is positioned across the lesion, it is expanded, causing the length of the tube to contract and the diameter to expand. Depending on the materials used in construction of the stent, the tube maintains the new shape either through mechanical force or otherwise. For example, one such stent is a self-expanding stainless steel wire braid. Other forms of stents include various types tubular metallic cylinders expanded by balloon dilatation. One such device is referred to as the Palmaz stent, discussed further below.




Another form of stent is a heat expandable device. This device, originally designed using NITINOL by Dotter has recently been modified to a new tin-coated, heat expandable coil by Regan. The stent is delivered to the affected area on a catheter capable of receiving heated fluids. Once properly positioned, heated saline is passed through the portion of the catheter on which the stent is located, causing the stent to expand. Numerous difficulties have been encountered with this device, including difficulty in obtaining reliable expansion, and difficulties in maintaining the stent in its expanded state.




Perhaps the most popular stent presently under investigation in the United States is referred to as the Palmaz stent. The Palmaz stent involves what may be thought of as a stainless steel cylinder having a number of slits in its circumference, resulting in a mesh when expanded. The stainless steel cylinder is delivered to the affected area by means of a balloon catheter, and is then expanded to the proper size by inflating the balloon.




Significant difficulties have been encountered with all prior art stents. Each has its percentage of thrombosis, restenosis and tissue in-growth, as well as varying degrees of difficulty in deployment. Another difficulty with at least some of prior art stents is that they do not readily conform to the vessel shape. In addition, the relatively long length of such prior art stents has made it difficult to treat curved vessels, and has also effectively prevented successful implantation of multiple such stents. Anticoagulants have historically been required at least for the first three months after placement. These and other complications have resulted in a low level of acceptance for such stents within the medical community, and to date stents have not been accepted as a practical method for treating chronic restenosis.




Thus there has been a long felt need for a stent which is effective to maintain a vessel open, without resulting in significant thrombosis, which may be easily delivered to the affected area, easily expanded to the desired size, easily conformed to the affected vessel, and easily used in multiples to treat curved vessels and varying lengths of lesions.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention substantially reduces the complications and overcomes the limitations of the prior art devices. The endovascular support device of the present invention comprises a device having very low mass which is capable of being delivered to the affected area by means of a slightly modified conventional balloon catheter similar to that used in a standard balloon angioplasty procedure.




The support device of the present invention may then be expanded by normal expansion of the balloon catheter used to deliver the stent to the affected area, and its size can be adjusted within a relatively broad range in accordance with the diagnosis of the treating physician.




Because of the range of diameters through which the support device of the present invention may be expanded, it may be custom expanded to the specific lesion diameter, and is readily conformable to the vessel shape. In addition, a plurality of support devices of the present invention may be readily implanted in a number commensurate with the length of the lesion under treatment. As a result, curved or “S” shaped vessels may be treated.




The stent, or endovascular support device, of the present invention may preferably be comprised of implantable quality high grade stainless steel, machined specially for intravascular applications. The support device may comprise, in effect, a metal circle or ellipsoid formed to create a plurality of axial bends, thereby permitting compression of the stent onto a delivery catheter, and subsequent expansion once in place at the affected area.




It is one object of the present invention to provide a stent which substantially overcomes the limitations of the prior art.




It is a further object of the present invention to provide a stent capable of being implanted simply and reliably.




Another object of the present invention is to provide a stent which does not result in significant thrombosis at the point of implant.




Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a stent which can be selectively sized in accordance with the anatomic configuration dictated by the lesion itself.




A still further object of the present invention is to provide a method for supplying an endovascular support device which permits a plurality of such devices to be implanted commensurate with the length of the lesion under treatment.




These and other objects of the present invention can be better appreciated from the following detailed description of the invention, taken in conjunction with the attached drawings.











FIGURES





FIG. 1

shows a perspective view of an endovascular support device constructed according to the present invention, in its expanded form.





FIG. 2

shows a support device constructed according to the present invention and compressed onto a balloon catheter.





FIG. 3

shows a support device compressed onto a balloon catheter as shown in

FIG. 2

, and positioned within a sectioned portion of an affected area of a artery or other vessel.





FIG. 4

shows a support device according to the present invention in its expanded form within a sectioned portion of a vessel including a lesion.





FIG. 5

shows a support device of the present invention in its expanded form within a sectioned portion of a lesion after removal of the balloon catheter.





FIGS. 6



a-b


show alternative configurations of a support device according to the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




Referring first to

FIG. 1

, an endovascular support device


10


, referred to hereinafter more conveniently as a stent, constructed in accordance with the present invention can be seen in perspective view. The stent


10


of

FIG. 1

is shown in its expanded form, prior to compression over a suitable delivery system as discussed in detail hereinafter.




In a preferred embodiment, the stent


10


comprises a single piece of material, bent to form a plurality of upper axial turns


12


and lower axial turns


14


. In the embodiment shown in

FIG. 1

, four upper turns


12


are connected to the four lower turns


14


by substantially straight segments


16


. The axial turns


12


and


14


can be seen to permit the stent


10


to be compressed or expanded over a wide range while still maintaining significant mechanical force, such as required to prevent a vessel from restenosing. While a preferred embodiment comprises a single piece of material, in some instances a suitably welded wire may be acceptable.




It will be appreciated that the number of turns


12


and


14


can vary over a reasonably wide range, and may in fact vary between two and ten such turns or peaks. However, it is currently believed that the optimum number of turns or peaks will range between three and five for most applications, and particularly for cardiovascular applications.




The stent


10


is preferably constructed of implantable materials having good mechanical strength. An embodiment which has proven successful in preliminary testing is machined from 316LSS implantable quality stainless steel bar stock. The bar stock is machined to form substantially a toroid, which is then acid etched in phosphoric and sulfuric acid at approximately 180• to 185• to break the edges. The etched toroid is then plated with copper to avoid galling and to provide lubricity.




The copper plated toroid is then bent to the shape of the stent


10


shown in

FIG. 1

, after which the copper plating is stripped from the stent. The stent is then returned to the acid bath to reduce the wire size to the desired diameter, which is in the range of 0.002″ to 0.025″. It is presently believed that the optimum wire size for the final product is in the range of 0.008″ to 0.009″. It will be appreciated that the strength of the stent—that is, its ability to prevent restenosis—is inversely proportional to the number of peaks or turns in the stent, so that stents having a greater number of turns will typically be formed of larger wire diameters. Finally, although not required in all cases, the outside of the stent may be selectively plated with platinum to provide improved visibility during fluoroscopy. The cross-sectional shape of the finished stent may be circular, ellipsoidal, rectangular, hexagonal, square, or other polygon, although at present it is believed that circular or ellipsoidal may be preferable.




The minimum length of the stent, or the distance between the upper turns


12


and lower turns


14


, is determined in large measure by the size of the vessel into which the stent will be implanted. The stent


10


will preferably be of sufficient length as to maintain its axial orientation within the vessel without shifting under the hydraulics of blood flow (or other fluid flow in different types of vessels), while also being long enough to extend across at least a significant portion of the affected area. At the same time, the stent should be short enough as to not introduce unnecessarily large amounts of material as might cause undue thrombosis. Typical cardiovascular vessels into which the stent


10


might be implanted range from 1.5 millimeters to five millimeters in diameter, and corresponding stents may range from one millimeter to two centimeters in length. However, in most instances the stent will range in length between 3.5 millimeters and 6 millimeters. Preliminary testing of stents having a length between 3.5 millimeters and 4.5 millimeters has been performed with good success outside the United States, and testing on animals is also ongoing.




Once the wire size of the stent


10


has been reduced to the desired size, the stent


10


may be crimped onto a balloon


100


, as shown in

FIG. 2

, for delivery to the affected region


102


of a vessel


104


such as a coronary artery. For the sake of simplicity, the multiple layers of the vessel wall


104


are shown as a single layer, although it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the lesion typically is a plaque deposit within the intima of the vessel


104


.




One suitable balloon for delivery of the stent


10


is manufactured by Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., of Santa Clara, Calif. (“ACS”), and is eight millimeters in length with Microglide• on the shaft only. The stent-carrying balloon


100


is then advanced to the affected area and across the lesion


102


in a conventional manner, such as by use of a guide wire and a guide catheter (not shown). A suitable guide wire is the 0.014″ Hi Torque Floppy manufactured by ACS, and a suitable guiding catheter is the ET.076 lumen guide catheter, also manufactured by ACS.




Once the balloon


100


is in place across the lesion


102


, as shown in

FIG. 3

, the balloon


100


may be inflated, again substantially in a conventional manner. In selecting a balloon, it is helpful to ensure that the balloon will provide radially uniform inflation so that the stent


10


will expand equally along each of the peaks. The inflation of the balloon


100


, shown in

FIG. 4

, causes the expansion of the stent


10


from its crimped configuration back to a shape substantially like that shown in FIG.


1


. The amount of inflation, and commensurate amount of expansion of the stent


10


, may be varied as dictated by the lesion itself, making the stent of the present invention particularly flexible in the treatment of chronic restenosis.




Because of the inflation of the balloon, the lesion


102


in the vessel


104


is expanded, and causes the arterial wall of the vessel


104


to bulge radially, as simplistically depicted in FIG.


4


. At the same time, the plaque deposited within the intima of the vessel is displaced and thinned, and the stent


10


is embedded in the plaque or other fibrotic material adhering to the intima of the vessel


104


.




Following inflation of the balloon


100


and expansion of the stent


10


within the vessel


104


, the balloon is deflated and removed. The exterior wall of the vessel


104


returns to its original shape through elastic recoil. The stent


10


, however, remains in its expanded form within the vessel, and prevents further restenosis of the vessel. The stent maintains an open passageway through the vessel, as shown in

FIG. 4

, so long as the tendency toward restenosis is not greater than the mechanical strength of the stent


10


. Because of the low mass of the support device


10


of the present invention, thrombosis is less likely to occur. Ideally, the displacement of the plaque deposits and the implantation of the stent


10


will result in a smooth inside diameter of the vessel


104


, although this ideal cannot be achieved in all cases.




One of the advantages of the stent


10


is that multiple stents may be used in the treatment of a single lesion. Thus, for example, in the event the affected area shown in

FIGS. 3 and 4

was longer than the stent


10


, additional stents


10


could be positioned elsewhere along the lesion to prevent restenosis. In preliminary testing, up to four stents have been used successfully along a single lesion. Due to the conformability of the stent


10


, not only can varying lesion lengths be treated,but curved vessels and “S” shaped vessels may also be treated by the present invention. In instances where it is known in advance that multiple stents will be the preferred method of treatment, a plurality of such stents may be positioned along a single balloon catheter for simultaneous delivery to the affected area.




As discussed above, the number of peaks or turns


12


and


14


in the stent


10


may vary between two and ten. To this end, shown in

FIGS. 6



a


and


6




b


are two alternative configurations of the stent


10


. The alternative embodiment shown in


6




a


can be seen to have three upper and three lower peaks or turns, while the embodiment shown in

FIG. 6



b


can be seen to have ten upper and ten lower peaks.




While the primary application for the stent


10


is presently believed to be treatment of cardiovascular disease such as atherosclerosis or other forms of coronary narrowing, the stent


10


of the present invention may also be used for treatment of narrowed vessels in the kidney, leg, carotid, or elsewhere in the body. In such other vessels,the size of the stent may need to be adjusted to compensate for the differing sizes of the vessel to be treated, bearing in mind the sizing guidelines provided above.




Having fully described a preferred embodiment of the invention, those skilled in the art will immediately appreciate, given the teachings herein, that numerous alternatives and equivalents exist which do not depart from the present invention. It is therefore to be understood that the present invention is not to be limited by the foregoing description, but only by the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A balloon expandable intralumenal support device, comprising:at least two generally circular elements aligned with and adjacent to each other when crimped on a balloon of a balloon catheter, each element including a wire having a plurality of axial turns, with one half of the turns facing a first direction and one half of the turns facing a second direction, wherein at least one axial turn of the one half of the turns facing a first direction and at least one axial turn of the one half of the turns facing a second direction are not connected to the axial turns of an adjacent element.
  • 2. The support device of claim 1, wherein each said element further includes a plurality of straight portions.
  • 3. The support device of claim 2, wherein at least one of said plurality of straight portions is disposed between each said axial turn.
  • 4. The support device of claim 2, wherein said straight portions extend from a first axial turn facing said first direction to a second axial turn facing said second direction.
  • 5. The support device of claim 1, wherein at least one of said elements is metallic.
  • 6. The support device of claim 5, wherein at least one of said elements is made of a metal alloy.
  • 7. The support device of claim 1, wherein at least one of said elements is expandable from a first unexpanded radius to a second expanded radius.
  • 8. The support device of claim 1, wherein said axial turns have a first end and a second end, such that the movement of said first end away from said second end causes said element to expand.
  • 9. The support device of claim 1, wherein said at least two elements are simultaneously expandable within a body lumen.
  • 10. The support device of claim 1, wherein said axial turns are generally U-shaped.
  • 11. A intralumenal support device, comprising:a plurality of balloon expandable rings parallel and adjacently aligned, each ring comprising axial turns, wherein at least one of said axial turns facing a first direction and at least one of said axial turns facing a second direction are not connected to an adjacently aligned expandable ring.
  • 12. The support device of claim 11, wherein each of said plurality of balloon expandable rings further includes a plurality of straight portions.
  • 13. The support device of claim 12, wherein at least one of said plurality of straight portions is disposed between a pair of said axial turns.
  • 14. The support device of claim 12, wherein said straight portions extend from a first axial turn to a second axial turn.
  • 15. The support device of claim 11, wherein said rings are metallic.
  • 16. The support device of claim 15, wherein said rings are made of a metal alloy.
  • 17. The support device of claim 11, wherein said axial turns have a first end and a second end, such that the movement of said first end away from said second end causes said rings to expand.
  • 18. The support device of claim 11, wherein said rings are simultaneously expandable within a body lumen.
  • 19. The support device of claim 11, wherein each of said axial turns forms a hair-pin turn.
  • 20. An intravascular stent device, comprising:a plurality of undulating rings adjacently aligned, said ring having a generally circular shape and being capable of being expanded from a first diameter to a second diameter by the inflation of a balloon of a balloon catheter; wherein said undulating rings are formed from at least alternating axial turns; and wherein at least two adjacent alternating axial turns are not connected to an adjacently aligned undulating ring.
  • 21. The stent device of claim 20, wherein each undulating ring further includes a plurality of straight portions.
  • 22. The support device of claim 21, wherein at least one of said plurality of straight portions is disposed between adjacent alternating axial turns.
  • 23. The support device of claim 22, wherein said straight portions span the entire distance between adjacent alternating axial turns.
  • 24. The support device of claim 20, wherein said undulating rings are metallic.
  • 25. The support device of claim 24, wherein said undulating rings are made of a metal alloy.
  • 26. The support device of claim 20, wherein said undulating rings are expandable from a first unexpanded radius to a second expanded radius.
  • 27. The support device of claim 20, wherein said axial turns have a first end and a second end, such that the movement of said first end away from said second end causes said rings to expand.
  • 28. The support device of claim 20, wherein said adjacently aligned undulating rings are simultaneously expandable within a body lumen.
  • 29. The support device of claim 20, wherein said axial turns are generally U-shaped.
US Referenced Citations (219)
Number Name Date Kind
2070073 Walton Feb 1937 A
2701559 Cooper Feb 1955 A
2854982 Pagano Oct 1958 A
2854983 Baskin Oct 1958 A
3105492 Jeckel Oct 1963 A
3155095 Brown Nov 1964 A
3284762 Kompanek Nov 1966 A
3334629 Cohn Aug 1967 A
3526005 Bokros et al. Sep 1970 A
3540431 Mobin-Uddin Nov 1970 A
3562820 Braun Feb 1971 A
3599641 Sheridan Aug 1971 A
3657744 Ersek Apr 1972 A
3713175 Weisman Jan 1973 A
3714671 Edwards et al. Feb 1973 A
3774596 Cook Nov 1973 A
3834394 Hunter et al. Sep 1974 A
3858441 Comeau et al. Jan 1975 A
3868956 Alfidi et al. Mar 1975 A
3874388 King et al. Apr 1975 A
3882845 Bucalo May 1975 A
3889685 Miller, Jr.et al. Jun 1975 A
3893344 Dantlgraber et al. Jul 1975 A
3894974 Hunter et al. Jul 1975 A
3952747 Kimmell, Jr. Apr 1976 A
3968800 Vilasi Jul 1976 A
4038702 Sawyer Aug 1977 A
4047252 Liebig et al. Sep 1977 A
4056854 Boretos et al. Nov 1977 A
4061134 Samuels et al. Dec 1977 A
4065816 Sawyer Jan 1978 A
4076285 Martinez Feb 1978 A
4080706 Heilman et al. Mar 1978 A
4105022 Antoshkiw et al. Aug 1978 A
4106129 Carpentier et al. Aug 1978 A
4140126 Choudhury Feb 1979 A
4159719 Haerr Jul 1979 A
4183102 Guiset Jan 1980 A
4190909 Ablaza Mar 1980 A
4195637 Gruntzig et al. Apr 1980 A
4198982 Fortner et al. Apr 1980 A
4214587 Sakura, Jr. Jul 1980 A
4276132 Fettel et al. Jun 1981 A
4295464 Shihata Oct 1981 A
4299226 Banka Nov 1981 A
4300244 Bokros Nov 1981 A
4313231 Koyamada Feb 1982 A
4319363 Ketharanathan Mar 1982 A
4323994 Coogler Apr 1982 A
4328811 Fogarty May 1982 A
4338942 Fogarty Jul 1982 A
4340046 Cox Jul 1982 A
4343048 Ross et al. Aug 1982 A
4343049 Fettel et al. Aug 1982 A
4390599 Broyles Jun 1983 A
4402307 Hanson et al. Sep 1983 A
4403612 Fogarty Sep 1983 A
4448195 LeVeen et al. May 1984 A
4479497 Fogarty et al. Oct 1984 A
4483340 Fogarty et al. Nov 1984 A
4493711 Chin et al. Jan 1985 A
4494531 Gianturco Jan 1985 A
4503569 Dotter Mar 1985 A
4512338 Balko et al. Apr 1985 A
4531933 Norton et al. Jul 1985 A
4550447 Seiler, Jr. et al. Nov 1985 A
4553545 Maass et al. Nov 1985 A
4560374 Hammerslag Dec 1985 A
4562596 Kornberg Jan 1986 A
4572186 Gould et al. Feb 1986 A
4577631 Kreamer Mar 1986 A
4580568 Gianturco Apr 1986 A
4586505 Sisson et al. May 1986 A
4604762 Robinson Aug 1986 A
4617932 Kornberg Oct 1986 A
4619246 Molgaard-Nielsen et al. Oct 1986 A
4619261 Guerriero Oct 1986 A
4641653 Rockey Feb 1987 A
4643184 Mobin-Uddin Feb 1987 A
4647416 Seiler, Jr. et al. Mar 1987 A
4649922 Wiktor Mar 1987 A
4650466 Luther Mar 1987 A
4655771 Wallsten Apr 1987 A
4660559 McGregor et al. Apr 1987 A
4660560 Klein Apr 1987 A
4665918 Garza et al. May 1987 A
4670734 Caddock Jun 1987 A
4673409 Van Kampen Jun 1987 A
4676241 Webb et al. Jun 1987 A
4680031 Alonso Jul 1987 A
4681110 Wiktor Jul 1987 A
4699611 Bowden Oct 1987 A
4704126 Baswell et al. Nov 1987 A
4705517 DiPisa, Jr. Nov 1987 A
4706671 Weinrib Nov 1987 A
4710181 Fuqua Dec 1987 A
4723549 Wholey et al. Feb 1988 A
4731054 Billeter et al. Mar 1988 A
4733665 Palmaz Mar 1988 A
4739762 Palmaz Apr 1988 A
4740207 Kreamer Apr 1988 A
4760849 Kropf Aug 1988 A
4762128 Rosenbluth Aug 1988 A
4767418 Deininger et al. Aug 1988 A
4768507 Fischell et al. Sep 1988 A
4771773 Kropf Sep 1988 A
4775426 Murley et al. Oct 1988 A
4776337 Palmaz Oct 1988 A
4787899 Lazarus Nov 1988 A
4793348 Palmaz Dec 1988 A
4794928 Kletschka Jan 1989 A
4795458 Regan Jan 1989 A
4800882 Gianturco Jan 1989 A
4813925 Anderson, Jr. et al. Mar 1989 A
4830003 Wolff et al. May 1989 A
4842575 Hoffman, Jr. et al. Jun 1989 A
4848343 Wallsten et al. Jul 1989 A
4856516 Hillstead Aug 1989 A
4869714 Deininger et al. Sep 1989 A
4870966 Dellon et al. Oct 1989 A
4875480 Imbert Oct 1989 A
4877030 Beck et al. Oct 1989 A
4878906 Lindemann et al. Nov 1989 A
4886062 Wiktor Dec 1989 A
4892539 Koch Jan 1990 A
4892541 Alonso Jan 1990 A
4893623 Rosenbluth Jan 1990 A
4902289 Yannas Feb 1990 A
4907336 Gianturco Mar 1990 A
4913141 Hillstead Apr 1990 A
4922905 Strecker May 1990 A
4923464 DiPisa, Jr. May 1990 A
4950227 Savin et al. Aug 1990 A
4954126 Wallsten Sep 1990 A
4969458 Wiktor Nov 1990 A
4969890 Sugita et al. Nov 1990 A
4986831 King et al. Jan 1991 A
4990155 Wilkoff Feb 1991 A
4994032 Sugiyama et al. Feb 1991 A
4994071 MacGregor Feb 1991 A
4994077 Dobben Feb 1991 A
4998539 Delsanti Mar 1991 A
4998923 Samson et al. Mar 1991 A
5002560 Machold et al. Mar 1991 A
5007926 Derbyshire Apr 1991 A
5015253 MacGregor May 1991 A
5019085 Hillstead May 1991 A
5019090 Pinchuk May 1991 A
5026377 Burton et al. Jun 1991 A
5034001 Garrison et al. Jul 1991 A
5035706 Gianturco et al. Jul 1991 A
5037377 Alonso Aug 1991 A
5037392 Hillstead Aug 1991 A
5037427 Harada et al. Aug 1991 A
5041126 Gianturco Aug 1991 A
5059211 Stack et al. Oct 1991 A
5061275 Wallsten et al. Oct 1991 A
5062829 Pryor et al. Nov 1991 A
5064435 Porter Nov 1991 A
5071407 Termin et al. Dec 1991 A
5078726 Kreamer Jan 1992 A
5078736 Behl Jan 1992 A
5084065 Weldon et al. Jan 1992 A
5089005 Harada Feb 1992 A
5089006 Stiles Feb 1992 A
5092877 Pinchuk Mar 1992 A
5102417 Palmaz Apr 1992 A
5104399 Lazarus Apr 1992 A
5104404 Wolff Apr 1992 A
5108416 Ryan et al. Apr 1992 A
5108417 Sawyer Apr 1992 A
5122154 Rhodes Jun 1992 A
5123917 Lee Jun 1992 A
5133732 Wiktor Jul 1992 A
5135536 Hillstead Aug 1992 A
5163958 Pinchuk Nov 1992 A
5192307 Wall Mar 1993 A
5195984 Schatz Mar 1993 A
5201901 Harada Apr 1993 A
RE34327 Kreamer Jul 1993 E
5226913 Pinchuk Jul 1993 A
5236447 Kubo et al. Aug 1993 A
5266073 Wall Nov 1993 A
5275622 Lazarus Jan 1994 A
5282824 Gianturco Feb 1994 A
5282848 Schmitt Feb 1994 A
5292331 Boneau Mar 1994 A
5306286 Stack et al. Apr 1994 A
5314444 Gianturco May 1994 A
5342348 Kaplan Aug 1994 A
5382261 Palmaz Jan 1995 A
5383892 Cardon et al. Jan 1995 A
5397345 Lazarus Mar 1995 A
5421955 Lau et al. Jun 1995 A
5443496 Schwartz et al. Aug 1995 A
5507767 Maeda et al. Apr 1996 A
5507768 Lau et al. Apr 1996 A
5507771 Gianturco Apr 1996 A
5527336 Rosenbluth et al. Jun 1996 A
5549635 Solar Aug 1996 A
5554181 Das Sep 1996 A
5556413 Lam Sep 1996 A
5562728 Lazarus Oct 1996 A
5569295 Lam Oct 1996 A
5591197 Orth et al. Jan 1997 A
5591198 Boyle et al. Jan 1997 A
5618299 Khosravi et al. Apr 1997 A
5618301 Hauenstein Apr 1997 A
5653727 Wiktor Aug 1997 A
5662700 Lazarus Sep 1997 A
5669936 Lazarus Sep 1997 A
5674278 Boneau Oct 1997 A
5800509 Boneau Sep 1998 A
5817152 Birdsall et al. Oct 1998 A
5824059 Wijay Oct 1998 A
5879382 Boneau Mar 1999 A
5891190 Boneau Apr 1999 A
5902332 Schatz May 1999 A
6344053 Boneau Feb 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (31)
Number Date Country
B-5319894 Aug 1989 AU
B-6133390 Aug 1989 AU
A-2378488 Apr 1999 AU
2410933 Sep 1974 DE
3205942 Sep 1983 DE
3640745 Jun 1987 DE
690 29 114 T 2 Mar 1997 DE
0417928 Dec 1996 DK
0 417 928 Mar 1981 EP
0 183 372 Jun 1986 EP
0 177 330 Sep 1986 EP
0 274 846 Jul 1988 EP
0 282 175 Sep 1988 EP
0 312 852 Apr 1989 EP
0 417 928 Aug 1989 EP
0 423 916 Apr 1991 EP
0 483 372 May 1992 EP
0 540 290 May 1993 EP
0 729 767 Sep 1996 EP
1205743 Sep 1970 GB
2 092 894 Aug 1982 GB
2 135 585 Sep 1984 GB
60-500520 Apr 1985 JP
61-41444 Feb 1986 JP
1-145076 Jun 1989 JP
660689 May 1979 SU
764684 Sep 1980 SU
1217402 Mar 1986 SU
1457921 Feb 1989 SU
WO 8303752 Nov 1983 WO
WO 8901798 Mar 1989 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (139)
Entry
9 Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2 (Supplement A):106A, (from Abstracts of the 36th Annual Scientific Session, American College of Cardiology, New Orleans, Louisiana, Mar. 8-12, 1987), Elsevier (Feb. 1987).
Alvarado, R., et al., “Evaluation of Polymer-coated Balloon-expandabe Stents in Bile Ducts,” 170 Radiology, No. 3, Part 2, 975-978 Easton, PA: The Radiological Society of North America (Mar. 1989).
American Heart Association 61st Scientific Sessions. Abstract Form. A New Percutaneous Expandable Stent.
Answer and Counterclaim of Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. and Guidant Sales Corporation to Amended and Supplemental Complaint of Medtronic AVE, Inc. and Medtronic USA, Inc., Medtronic AVE, Inc. et al. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 98-80-SLR (D. Del., Answer and Counterclaim dated Nov. 9, 2000).
Answer to Second Amended Complaint, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims, Medtronic AVE, Inc. et al. v. Boston Scientific Corp., et al., C.A. No. 98-478-ALR (D. Del. Answer dated Jul. 13, 2000).
Baier RE, Dutton RC, “Initial events in interaction of blood with a foreign surface,” J Biomed Mater Res Symp 1969; 3: 191-206.
Balko A., M.D., et al., “Transfermoral Placement of Intraluminal Polyurethane Prosthesis for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm,” Journal of Surgical Research 1986; 40: 305-309.
Becker, G.J., et al., “Simultaneous Angioplasty and Intraluminal Grafting with the Palmaz Expandable Intraluminal Graft,” 72nd Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America, Chicago (Nov./Dec. 1986).
Becker, G.J. et al., “Early Experience with the Palmaz Stent in Human Iliac Angioplasty,” Indiana Medicine, 286-292 (Apr. 1989).
Campbell, C.D. et al. “Expanded Microporous Polytetrafluoroethylene as a Vascular Substitute: A Two Year Follow-up,” 85 Surgery, No. 2, 177-183, St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Co. (Feb. 1979).
Carrasco, C.H., et al., “Expandable Biliary Endoprosthesis: An Experimental Study,” 145 AJR, 1279-1281, Baltimore: American Roentgen Ray Society (Dec. 1985).
Castañieda-Zuñga, W.R., ed., Transluminal Angioplasty, New York: Thieme-Stratton, .iii-207 (1983).
Charnsangavej, C., et al., “Endovascular Stent for Use in Aortic Dissection: An In Vitro Experiment,” 157 Radiology, 323-324, Easton, PA: The Radiological Society of North America (1985).
Charnsangavej C., M.D., et al., “Stenosis of the Vena Cava: Preliminary Assessment of Treatment with Expandable Metallic Stents,” Radiology 1986; Nov. 161: 295-298.
Charnsangavej C., M.D., et al., “A New Expandable Metallic Stent for Dilation of Stenotic Tubular Structures: Experimental and Clinical Evaluation,” Houston Medical Journal 1987; 3: 41-52.
Cimochowski, G., et al., “Greenfield Filter Versus Mobin-Uddin Umbrella,” 79 Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, No. 3, 358-365, St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Co. (Mar. 1980).
Coons, H., et al, “Large-Bore, Long Biliary Endoprosthese (Biliary Stents) for Improved Drainage,” 148 Radiology, 89-94, Easton, PA: The Radiological Society of North Americal (Jul. 1983).
Cope, C., “Balloon Dilatation of Closed Mesocaval Shunts,” 135 AJR, 989-993, Baltimore: American Roentgen Ray Society (Nov. 1980).
Cragg A., M.D., et al., “Nonsurgical Placement of Arterial Endoprostheses: A New Technique Using Nitinol Wire,” Radiology 1983; 147: 261-263.
Cragg, A., et al., “A New Percutaneous Vena Cava Filter,” 141 AJR, 601-604, Baltimore: American Roentgen Ray Society (Sep. 1983).
Cragg, A.H., et al., “Percunatenous Arterial Grafting,” 150 Radiology, No., 1, 45-49, Easton PA: The Radiological Society of North American (Jan. 1984).
Culverwell M., “Angioplasty Stents May Prevent Restenosis,” Cardio 1987; Jan.: 11-13.
Dalessandri, K.M., et al., “The Effect of Lumbar Sympatectomy on Postsynaptic Vascular Smooth Muscle Response in the Lower Limb in Dogs,” 11 Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, 82-85, New York: Springer-Verlag (1988).
Declaration of Paul Bonneau, Jr., Rodolfo Di Massa, M.D., et al. v. Simon Stertzer, M.D., et al., No. 222363 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sonoma County, Declaration dated May 12, 2000) (including Exhibits D1-D3).
Denny, D., et al., “Percutaneous Kimray-Greenfield Filter Placement by Femoral Vein Puncture,” 145 AJR, 827-829, Baltimore: American Roentgen Ray Society (Oct. 1985).
DePalma VA, Baier, Ford JW, Gott VL, Furuse A, “Investigation of Three Surface Properties of Several Metals and their relation to Blood Compatibility,” J Biomed Mater Res Symp 1972; 3: 37-75.
Deriu, G., et al., “The Rationale for Patch-Graft Angioplasty After Carotid Endarterectomy: Early and Long-Term Follow-Up,” 15 Stroke, No. 6, 972-979, Dallas: American Heart Association (Nov. 1984).
Dichek, D.A., et al., “Seeding of Inravascular Stents with Genetically Engineered Endothelial Cells,” 80 Circulation 1347-1353, Dallas: American Heart Association (1989).
Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 26th ed., 1981, pp. 675 & 759, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders (1981).
Dorros G., et al., “Clinical Research: Angioplasty” Circulation Supplement 1986; 74: 1448; II363.
Dotter, C., et al., “Transluminal Treatment of Arteriosclerotic Obstruction,” 30 Circulation, 654-670, Dallas: American Heart Association (Nov. 1964).
Dotter, C., “Interventional Radiology-Review of an Emerging Field,” 16 Seminars in Roentgenology No. 1 (Jan. 1981).
Dotter C.T., M.D., et al., “Transluminal Expandable Nitinol Coil Stent Gafting: Preliminary Report,” Radiology 1983; 147: 259-260.
Duprat G., Jr., M.D., et al., “Flexible Balloon-expanded Stent for Small Vessles” Radiology 1987; 162: 276-278.
Duprat G. Jr., M.D., et al., “Self-expanding Metallic Stents for Small Vessels: An Experimental Evaluation,” Radiology 1987; 162: 469-472.
Edwards, W.S., “Arterial Grafts,” 113 Archives of Surgery, No. 9, 1225-1233, Chicago: AMA (Nov. 1978).
Eichelter, P., et al., “Prophylaxis of Pulmonary Embolism,” 97 Archives of Surgery, 348-356, Chicago: AMA (Aug. 1968).
Fallone B.G., PhD., “Elastic Characteristics of the Self-expanding Metallic Stents,” Investigative Radiology 1988; 23; 370-376.
First Amended Complaint Asserting Derivative and Individual Causes of Action for Breach of Contract; Breach of Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; Breach of Piduciary Duty; Misappropriation of Trade Secrets; Unfair Competition; Intentional Misrepresentation; Concealment; Nondisclosure; Unjust Enrichment and Breach of Confidence, Rodolfo Di Massa, M.D., et al. v. Simon Stertzer, M.D., et al., No. 222363 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sonoma County, First Amended Complaint filed.
Fogarty, T.J., et al., “Adjunctive Intraoperative Arterial Dilation: Simplified Instrumentation Technique,” 116 Archives of Surgery, 1391-1398, Chicago: AMA (1981).
Fogarty, T.J., et al., “Current Status of Dilatation Catheters and Guiding Systems,” 53 The American Journal of Cardiology, No. 12, 97C-100C, New York: Robert T. Brawn (Jun. 1984).
Fogarty, T.J., et al., “Intraoperative Coronary Artery Balloon-Catheter Dilation,” 107 American Heart Journal, No. 4, 845-851, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby (1984).
Frimberger E., “Expanding Spiral—A New Type of Prosthesis for the Palliative Treatment of Malignant Esophageal Stenoses,” Endoscopy 1983; 15: 213-214.
Gardner, R.J., et al., “The Surgical Experience and a One to Sixteen Year Follow-Up of 277 Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms,” 135 American Journal of Surgery, No. 1, 226-230 (Jan. 1978).
Goldsten, H., et al., “Transcatheter Occlusion of Abdominal Tumors,” 120 Radiology, No. 3, 539-545, Easton, PA: Radiological Society of North America (Sep. 1976).
Greenfield, L., et al., “A New Intracaval Filter Permitting Continued Flow and Resolution of Emboli,” 73 Surgery, No. 4, 599-606, St. Louis: C.V. Mosby (Apr. 1973).
Güther, R., M.D., et al., “Percutaneous Nephropyelostomy Using a Pine-Needle Puncture Set,” 132 Radiology, No. 1, 228-230, Easton, PA: Radiological Society of North America (Jul. 1979).
Güther, R., M.D., et al., “Vena Caval Filter to Prevent Pulmonary Embolism: Experimental Study,” 156 Radiology, No. 2, 315-320, Easton, PA: Radiological Society of North America (Aug. 1985).
Harries-Jones, E.P., et al., “Repositioning of Biliary Endoprosthesis with Grüntzig Balloon Cateters,” 138 AJR, 771-772, Baltimore: American Roentgen Ray Society (Apr. 1982).
Hoevels, J., et al., “Percutaneous Transhepatic Insertion of a Permanent Endoprosthesis in Obstructive Lesions of the Extrahepatic Bile Ducts,” 4 Gastrointestinal Radiology, 367-377, NewYork: Springer-Velag (1979).
Honickman, S., et al., “Malpositioned Biliary Endoprosthesis,” 144 Radiology, 423-425, Easton, PA: Radiological Society of North America (Jul. 1982).
Hunter, J. et al., “Experimental Balloon Obstruction of the Inferior Vena Cava,” 171 Annals of Surgery, No. 2, 315-320, J.B. Lippincott (Feb. 1970).
Inoue, K., et al., “Clinical Application of Transvenous Mitral Commissurotomy by a New Balloon Catheter,” 87 J. Thorac. Cardiovascular Surg., No. 3, 394-402, St. Louis: C.V. Mosby (Mar. 1984).
Kan, J.S., et al., “Percutaneous Balloon Valvuloplasty: A New Method for Treating Congenital Pulmonary-Valve Stenosis,” 307 N. Engl. J. Med., No. 9, 540-543, Boston: Massachusetts Medical Society (1982).
Kerlan, Jr., et al., “Biliary Endoprostheses: Insertion Using a Combined Peroral-Transhepatic Method,” 150 Radiology, No. 3, 828-830, Easton, PA: Radiological Society of North America (1984).
Kerlan, R.K., Jr., et al., “A Simple Method for Insertion of Large Untapered Catheters,” 141 AJR, 792, Baltimore: American Roentgen Ray Society (Oct. 1983).
Lababidi, Z. et al., “Percuntatenous Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty: Results in 23 Patients,” 53 Am. J. Cardiol, 194-197, Robert T. Brawn (Jan. 1984).
Lary, B., et al., “The Experimental Use of Steel Mesh Tubes for the Replacement of Arterial Segments”, 72 AMA Archives of Surgery, 69-75, Chicago: AMA (Jan. 1956).
Lawrence, Jr. et al., “Percutaneous Endovascular Graft: Experimental Evaluation,” Radiology, 1987; 163: 357-360.
Lewandowski, B., et al., “The Air-Filled Hepatic Duct: The Saber Sign as an Aid to the Radiographic Diagnosis Pneumobilia,” 153 Radiology, No. 2, 329-332, Easton, PA: Radiological Society of North America (Nov. 1984).
Lund, G., et al., “A New Vena Caval Filter for Percutaneous Placement and Retrieval; Experimental Study,” 152 Radiology, No. 2, 369-372, Easton, PA: Radiological Society of North America (Aug. 1984).
Lunderquist, A., et al., “Guidewire for Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography,” 132 Radiology, No. 1, 228, Easton, PA: Radiological Society of North America (Jul. 1979).
Maass D., et al., “Radiological Follow-up of Transluminally Inserted Vascular Endoprostheses: An Experimental Study Using Expanding Spirals,” Radiology 1984; 152:659-663.
Mirich, M.D. et al., “Percutaneously Placed Endovascular Grafts for Aortic Aneurysms: Feasibility Study,” Radiology, 1989; 170: 1033-1037.
Mobin-Uddin, K., et al., “Caval Interruption for Prevention of Pulmonary Embolism,” 99 Archives on Surgery, 711-715, Chicago: AMA (Dec. 1969).
Mobin-Uddin, K., et al., “The Inferior Vena Cava Umbrella Filter,” 17 Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, No. 5, 391-399, Crune & Stratton (Mar./Apr. 1975).
Mullins C.E., M/D., et al., “Implantation of balloon-expandable intravascular grafts by cathertization in pulmonary arteries and systemic veins,” Circulation 1988; 77: 188-199.
Nanda, R., et al., “Effect of Maxillary Osteotomy on Subsequent Craniofacial Growth in Adolescent Monkeys,” Am J Orthod (May 1983).
Natiella, J.R., et al., “Tissue Response to Surface-Treated Tantalum Implants: Prelinary Observations in Primates,” 13 J. Biomed Mater Res., No. 4, 631-643 (Jul. 1979).
Palestrant, A., et al., “Comparative In Vitro Evaluation of the Nitinol Inferior Vena Cava Filter,” 145 Radiology, 351-355, Easton, PA: Radiological Society of North America (Nov. 1982).
Dr. Julio Palmaz's Monograph (1980).
Palmaz, J., et al., “Removable Biliary Endoprosthesis,” 140 AJR, 812-814, Baltimore: American Roentgen Ray Society (Apr. 1983).
Dr. Julio Palmaz's Monography (May 18, 1983).
Palmaz J.C., et al., “Expandable Intrahepatic Portacaval Shunt Stents: Early Experience in the Dog,” AJR 1985; 145: 821-825.
Plamaz J.C., M.D., “Expandable Intraluminal Graft: A Preliminary Study,” Radiology 1985; 156: 73-77.
Palmaz J.C., M.D., et al., “Atherosclerotic Rabbit Aortas: Expandable Intraluminal Grafting,” Radiology 1986; 3: 723-726.
Palmaz J.C., et al., “Expandable Intrahepatic Portacaval Shunt Stents in Dogs with Chronic Portal Hypertension,” AJR 1986; 147: 1251-1254.
Palmaz J.D., M.D., “Expandable intraluminal vascular graft: A feasibility study,” Surgery 1986; 2: 199-205.
Palmaz, J., et al., “Experimental Balloon Expandable Intraluminal Stenting of Normal and Abnormal Renal Arteries,” 72nd RSNA Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 1-23 [plus figures] (Nov. 1986).
Palmaz, J., et al., “Balloon Expandable Intraluminal Grafting of Normal and Abnormal Renal Arteries: Experimental Study,” 72nd Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting, Radiological Society of North America, Chicago (Nov./Dec. 1986).
Palmaz J.C., “Die intraluminale Stent Implantation nach Plamaz” Radiologe 1987; 11: 560-563.
Palmaz J.C., M.D., et al., “Normal and Stenotic Renal Arteries: Experimental Balloon-expandable Intraluminal Stenting,” Radiology 1987; Sep. 164: 750-708.
Palmaz, J., et al., “Balloon Expandable Intra-Arterial Stents: Effect of Anticoagulation on Thrombus Formation,” 76 Circulation Supplement, Part II, No. 4, 0108, Dallas: American Heart Association (Oct. 1987).
Palmaz JC, Tio FO, Schatz RA, Alvarado CR, Garcia O, “Early Endothelisation of Balloon-expandable Stents: Experimental Observations,” Journal of Interventional Radiology 1988: 119-124.
Palmaz, Julio C., “Balloon-Expandable Intravascular Stent,” AJR: 150, Jun. 1988: 1263-1269.
Palmaz, J., et al., “Intraluminal Stents in Atherosclerotic Iliac Artery Stenosis: Preliminary Report of a Multicenter Study,” 168 Radiology, No. 3, 727-731, Easton, PA: Radiological Society of North America (Sep. 1988).
Palmaz, J., et al., “Balloon-Expandable Intraarterial Stents: Effect of Antithrombotic Medication on Thrombus Formation,” Pros and Cons in PTA and Auxiliary Methods, 170-178 (1989).
Palmaz, J. “Chapter 30: Overview of Intravascular Stents,” in Ducksoo Kim and Dan E. Orron, Perhipheral Vascular Imaging and Intervention, St. Louis: Mosby Year Book, 507-508, (A. Patterson ed. 1992).
Papanicolaou N., et al, “Insertion of a Biliary Endoprosthesis Using a Balloon Dilation Catheter,” Gastrointestinal Radiology 1985; 10: 394-396.
Pate, J. ,et al., “A New Form of Vena Caval Interruption,” 169 Annals of Surgery, No. 6, 873-880, J.B. Lippincott (Jun. 1969).
Plaintiff Advanced Cardiovascular System's Answering Brief on Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Disqualify Lead Trial Counsel, Advanced Cardiovasuclar Systems, Inc. v. Arterial Vascular Engineering, Inc., C.A. No. 98-314-SLR (D. Del. Brief dated Sep. 18, 1998) (includes Exhibits A-W).
Plaintiff's Eight Amended Petition, Azam Anwar, M.D., et al. v. Arterial Vascular Engineering, Inc. No. 96-05323-M (Tex. Dist. Ct., Dallas County, 298th Judicial Dist., Petition dated Oct. 28, 1998).
Puel, J., et al., “Intravascular Stents to Prevent Restenosis After Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty,” 76 Circulation Supplement, Part II, No. 4, 0105, Dallas: American Heart Association (Oct. 1987).
Radiology 72nd Scientific Assembly and Meeting Agenda. 1986. Chicago: Nov. 30-Dec. 5.
Rashkind, W.J., et al., “Creation of an Atrial Septal Defect Without Thoracotomy: A Palliative Approach to Complete Transposition of the Great Arteries,” 196 JAMA, No. 11, 173-174, Chicago: AMA (Apr.-Jun. 1966).
Rees, C.R., et al., “The Hemodynamic Effects of the Administration of Ionic and Nonionic Contrast Materials into the Pulmonary Arteries of a Canine Model of Acute Pulmonary Hypertension,” 23 Investigative Radiology, No. 3, 184-189 (Mar. 1988).
Rees, C.R., et al., “DSA is Actue Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: Clinical and in Vitro Studies,” 169 Radiology, No. 2, 499-503, Easton, PA: Radiological Society of North America (Nov. 1988).
Rees, C.R., et al., “Angioplasty and Stenting of Completely Occluded Iliac Arteries,” 172 Radiology, No. 3, Part. 2, 953-959, Easton, PA: Radiological Society of North America (Sep. 1989).
Richter, G.M., et al., “Der Transjuguslaere Intrahepatische Portosystemische Stent-Shunt (TIPSS); Eine Neue Nichtoperative, Perkutane Methode,” 29 Radiologe, 406-411, Springer-Verlag (1989) [Article includes an English Summary].
Richter, G.M. et al., “Die Behandlung eines akuten Beckenarterienverschlusses durch Katheterlyse, Katheterdilatation und Implantation einer neuartigen metallischen Gefäβendoprothese,” 60 Der Chirurg, No. 5, 346-351, Berlin: Springer-Verlag (May 1989) [Article includes an English Summary].
Ring, E.J., et al., “A Simple, Indwelling Biliary Endoprosthesis Made From Common Available Catheter Material,” 139 AJR, 615-617, Baltimore: American Roentgen Ray Society (Sep. 1982).
Roch et al., “Experimental Intrahepatic Protacaval Anastomosis: Use of Expandable Gianturco Stents,” Radiology, 1987; 162: 481-485.
Roehm, Jr., et al., “Percutaneous Transcatheter Filter for the Interior Vena Cava,” 150 Radiology, No. 1, 255-257, Easton, PA: Radiological Society of North America (Jan. 1984).
Roland M., M.D., “Spiral Teflon Stent for Tuboplasty Involving Fimbria,” Obstetrics Gynecology 1970; 36: 359-362.
Rollins, N., et al., “Self-Expanding Metallic Stents: Preliminary Evaluation in an Atheroschlerotic Model,” 163 Radiology, No. 3, 739-742, Easton, PA: Radiological Society of North America (Jun. 1987).
Rosch, J., et al., “Transjugular-Intrahepatic Portacaval Shunt: An Experimental Work,” 121 The American Journal of Surgery, 588-592, New York: Reuben H. Donnelley (May 1971).
Rosch J., et al., “Modified Gianturco Expandable Wire Stents In Experimental and Clinical Use,” CIRSE 1987; 31: 100-103.
Rosch J., M.D. et al., “Gianturco Expandable Wire Stents in the Treatment of Superior Vena Cava Syndrome Recurring After Maximum-Tolerance Radiation,” Cancer 1987; 60: 1243-1246.
Rosch J., Putnam J., Uchida B., “Gianturco Expandable Stents In Experimental And Clinical Use,” Diagnostic Angiography and Interventional, Radiology Course, Mar. 1987; Hand-Out: 121-124.
Roubin G., et al., “Early and late results of intracoronary arterial stenting after coronary angioplast in dogs,” Circulation 1987; 4: 891-897.
Rousseau, H., et al., “Percutaneous Vascular Stent: Experimental Studies and Preliminary Clinical Results in Peripheral Arterial Diseases,” Inter. Angio. 6, 153-161 (1987).
Rousseau H., M.D. et al., “Self-expanding Endovascular Prosthesis: An Experimental Study,” Radiology 1987; Sep. 164: 709-714.
Rodolfo Di Massa's Supplemental Answers to Defendant Medtronic Arterial Vascular Engineering Inc.'s First Set of Specially Prepared Interrogatories, Rodolfo Di Massa, M.D., et al. v. Simon Stertzer, M.D., et al., No. 222363 (Cal. Super. Ct., Sonoma County, Supplemental Answers dated Mar. 15, 2000).
Schatz R., et al., “Balloon Expandable Intracoronary Stentes in Dogs,” Circulation Supplement 1986; 74: 1824; II458.
Schatz, R., et al., “Balloon Expandable Intravascular Grafts,” 36th Annual Symposium of the Texas Health Institute—International Symposium on Interventional Cardiology, Houston (Sep. 1986).
Schatz, R., et al., “Balloon Expandable Intracoronary Stents in the Adult Dog,” 59th Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association Meeting, Dallas (Nov. 1986).
Schatz R., M.D., et al., “Balloon-expandable intracoronary stents in the adult dog,” Circulation 1987; 76: 450-457.
Schatz, R., et al., “Balloon Expandable Intracoronary Stents in the Adult Dog,” 76 Circulation No. 2, 450-457, Dallas: American Heart Association (Aug. 1987).
Schatz, R., et al., “New Technology in Angioplasty: Balloon-Expandable Intravascular Stents,” 2 New Developments in Medicine, No. 2, 59-75 (Sep. 1987).
Schatz, Richard A., Palmaz, Julio C., “Intravascular Stents for Angioplasty,” Cardio, Dec. 1987: 27-31.
Schatz, Richard, “Introduction to Intravascular Stents,” Cardiology Clinics 1988; vol. 6, NO. 3: 357-372.
Schatz, Righcard “A View of Vascular Stents,” Circulation 1989; 79: 445-457.
Semb, B.K.H., et al., “Balloon Valvulotomy of Congenital Pulmonary Valve Stenosis with Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency,” 2 Cardiovascular Radiology, 239-241, New York: Springer-Verlag (1979).
Sigwart U., M.D., et al., “Intravascular Stents To Prevent Occlusion And Restenosis After Transluminal Angioplasty,” The New England Journal of Medicine 1987; 316: 701-706.
Sigwart, U., et al., “One Year of Percutaneous Coronary Stenting,” 76 Circulation Supplement, Part II, No. 4, 0104, Dallas: American Heart Association (Oct. 1987).
Sigwart, U., et al., “Intial Experience With A New Approach to Stenting of Peripheral and Coronary Arteries,” (date unknown)
Simon, M., et al., “A Vena Cava Filter Using Thermal Shape Memory Alloy,” 125 Radiology, 89-94, Easton, PA: Radiological Society of North America (Oct. 1977).
Smith, D., et al., Safe and Effective Catheter Angiography Through Prosthetic Vascular Grafts, 138 Radiology, No. 2, 487-488, Easton, PA: Radiological Society of North America (Feb. 1981).
Solberg, S., et al., “Cold Induced Endothelial Cell Detachment in Human Saphenous Vein Grafts,” 28 Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, No. 5, 571-575, Minerva Medica (Sep.-Oct. 1987).
Stack, R., M.D., “A New Highly Flexible Balloon-Expandable Endovasular Stent: Initial Experiential Results and Up To Six Months Follow-up,” Laser One Meeting, Newport Beach, California (May 11-13, 1989).
Strecker, E.P., et al., “Perkutan Implantierbare, Durth Balloon Aufdehnbare Gefäβendoprothese,” 113 Dtsch Med Wschr, No. 14, 538-542, Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag (1988) [Article includes and English Summary].
Strecker E.P., et al., “A New Vascular Balloon-expandable Prosthesis-Experimental Studies and First Clinical Results,” Journal of Interventional Radiology 1988; 3: 59-62.
Teplick, S.K., et al., “A New Biliary Endoprosthesis,” 141 AJR, 799-801, Baltimore: American Roentgen Ray Society (Oct. 1983).
Trent, M., M.D., et al., “An Expandable Intravascular Stent for the Maintenance of Luminal Patency,” Division of Vascular Surgery and the Department of Surgery, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, date unknown.
Uchida B.T., et al., “Modifications of Gianturco Expandable Wire Stents,” AJR, 1988; 150: 1185-1187.
Urteil [Judgment], Inflow Dynamics AG, et al. v. Arterial Vascular Engineering, Inc., Nos. 4 Ni 33/99 (EU) verb. [joined with ] 4 Ni 41/99 (EU) (Bundespatentgerricht [BPatG] [Federal Court for Patent Matters] Sep. 5, 2000) (English Translation included).
Wallace MJ., et al, “Tracheobronchial Tree: Expandable Metallic Stents Used in Experimental and Clinical Applications,” Radiology 1986; 158: 309-312.
Wright K.C. Ph.D., Wallace S. M.D., Charnsangavej C. M.D., Carrasco, C.H. M.D., Gianturco C. M.D., “Percutaneous Endovascular Stents: An Experimental Evaluation,” Radiology, 1985; 156: 69-72.
Yoshioka, T., Wright K.C., Wallace S., Lawrence D.D. Jr., Ginaturco C., “Self-Expanding Endovascular Graft: An Experimental Study in Dogs,” AJR, vol. 151 Oct. 1988; 673-676.
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/984909 Oct 2001 US
Child 10/668287 US
Parent 09/287216 Apr 1999 US
Child 09/984909 US
Parent 08/471738 Jun 1995 US
Child 09/287216 US