This application relates generally to gas turbine engine airfoil arrays. More particularly, this application relates to influencing fluid flow near the leading edge portions of the airfoils within the airfoil array.
Gas turbine engines are known and typically include multiple sections, such as a fan section, a compression section, a combustor section, a turbine section, and an exhaust nozzle section. The fan section moves air into the engine. The air is compressed in the compression section. The compressed air is mixed with fuel and is combusted in the combustor section. Products of the combustion expand to rotatably drive the engine.
Some sections of the engine include vane arrays, blade arrays, or both. Air within the engine moves through fluid flow passages in the arrays. The fluid flow passages are established by adjacent airfoils projecting from laterally extending endwalls. As known, air approaching the fluid flow passages can separate from portions of the arrays. The separation within the engine can disadvantageously increase aerodynamic losses and can contribute to locally increased convective heat loads. The separation often occurs in vane arrays or blade arrays having airfoils with low camber angles, such as some of the airfoils within the turbine section of the engine.
An example airfoil assembly includes a base having an airfoil projecting radially therefrom. The base extends laterally away from the airfoil. The airfoil extends axially from an airfoil leading edge portion to an airfoil trailing edge portion. The base has a humped area forward the airfoil leading edge portion.
An example gas turbine engine assembly includes an endwall and an array of airfoils circumferentially distributed about an axis. The endwall and the airfoils establish a plurality of fluid flow passages. A plurality of convex features is circumferentially distributed about the axis. At least a portion of the convex features are positioned axially forward the fluid flow passages and is configured to influence flow through the fluid flow passages.
An example method of influencing flow within a gas turbine engine includes moving a fluid axially toward a fluid flow passage established between adjacent airfoils in a gas turbine engine. The airfoils project radially from an endwall. The method also includes limiting flow separation of the fluid near at least one of the airfoils using a hump projecting from the endwall.
These and other features of the example disclosure can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description:
In a two-spool design, the high-pressure turbine 30 utilizes the extracted energy from the hot combustion gases to power the high-pressure compressor 22 through a high speed shaft 38. The low-pressure turbine 34 utilizes the extracted energy from the hot combustion gases to power the low-pressure compressor 18 and the fan section 14 through a low speed shaft 42. The examples described in this disclosure are not limited to the two-spool architecture described and may be used in other architectures, such as a single-spool axial design, a three-spool axial design, and still other architectures. That is, there are various types of engines that could benefit from the examples disclosed herein, which are not limited to the design shown.
Referring to
The airfoils 54 extend axially from an airfoil leading edge portion 62 to an airfoil trailing edge portion 66. Adjacent ones of the airfoils 54 establish a flow passage 70 with the endwall 58. As known, fluid flow, such as airflow, moves toward the flow passage 70 from a position forward the leading edge portion 62 of the airfoils 54 as the engine 10 operates.
In this example, the endwall 58 includes a hump 74 extending axially forward the leading edge portions 62 of the airfoils 54 within the airfoil array 50. The example hump 74 extends radially away from the engine centerline X relative to a surface 76 of the endwall 58 adjacent the hump 74. The example airfoils 54 project radially outward from the endwall 58 having the hump 74. In another example, such as when the airfoils 54 comprise vanes, the airfoils 54 project radially inward from an endwall having the hump 74, and the hump 74 extends radially inward toward the engine centerline X. An endwall 80 in a prior art airfoil array 78 (
Referring now to
The example hump 74 has a radial peak 82 at an interface 86 of the hump 74 and the airfoil 54. In another example, the radial peak 82 of the hump 74 is axially forward the interface 86. Although some portions of the hump 74 extend rearward into the flow passage 70, the radial peak 82 of the hump 74 is forward the leading edge portion 62 and thus forward the flow passage 70. In yet another example, the radial peak 82 of the hump 74 is axially rearward the interface 86.
A radial height h1 of the hump 74 corresponds to the distance between the surface 76 of the endwall 58 and the radial peak 82. In this example, the radial height h1 of the hump 74 is between 5% and 25% the radial height h2, or span, of the airfoil 54.
The example airfoil 54 is a low camber airfoil, which typically corresponds to airfoil 54 having a camber angle θ of less than 60°. In this example, the camber angle θ of the airfoil 54 is about 30°. As known, low camber airfoils, such as the airfoil 54, are particularly prone to separation of flow near the leading edge portions 62. Higher camber airfoils, however, could also benefit from the hump 74.
The example airfoil array 50 the airfoil array 50 is a turbine exit guide vane assembly. In another example, the airfoil array 50 is a mid-turbine frame component that is positioned axially between the high-pressure turbine 30 and the low-pressure turbine 34 of the engine 10 (
Features of the disclosed embodiments include reducing convective heat loads and improving aerodynamic performance of airfoil arrays by positioning a hump near the leading edges of airfoils within the airfoil array, and particularly the leading edges of low camber airfoils.
Although a preferred embodiment has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2198254 | Koehring | Apr 1940 | A |
4208167 | Yasugahira et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
6283713 | Harvey et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6561761 | Decker et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6669445 | Staubach et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6884029 | Beeck | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6969232 | Zess et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7134842 | Tam et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7150427 | Praisner et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7220100 | Lee et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7371046 | Lee et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7625181 | Matsuda et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
20060275126 | Heitland et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070258817 | Allen-Bradley et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258818 | Allen-Bradley et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070258819 | Allen-Bradley et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20100074763 | Liang | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100254797 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |