This application claims the priority of Application No. 101 49 121.2-12, filed Oct. 5, 2001, in Germany, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated by reference herein.
The invention relates to an energy-absorbing bumper with a structural part, which is arranged underneath an outer skin or shell with soft impact characteristics, supports the outer skin in a flexible manner and has a cross section that differs from the cross section of the outer skin or shell.
A bumper of this kind known from German Patent Document DE 25 05 169 A1 has a structural part made from elastic waste product components, which are embedded in a binder, in particular a reaction resin.
In the case of a bumper illustrated by way of example in DE 25 05 169 A1, the outer casing or shell comprises two separate shell components, which are very largely symmetrical with respect to a horizontal plane and are arranged as cantilevers in the region of a contact zone, which is the first to be subjected to loading when the vehicle collides with a pedestrian.
In German Patent Document DE 17 55 512 A and corresponding U.S. Pat. No. 3,836,192 covering parts of the outer surface of the outer skin of the vehicle are disclosed, in particular a passenger vehicle, that are at risk of impact with an elastically and/or plastically flexible plastic, in particular a foam. The hardness of the plastic layer may possibly decrease from the outside inwards. Hollow chambers, which are filled with a fluid that can yield when subjected to impact, are furthermore formed at particularly exposed locations, e.g. bumpers or front or rear flaps.
In European Patent Document EP 1 046 546 A1 a bumper designed essentially as a foam component is described. This bumper can have a central and an upper region that are set back relative to a lower edge region. Provision is furthermore made to design the lower region with increased stiffness. This is intended to ensure that collision forces take effect preferentially at a low level above the roadway in the event of accidents involving pedestrians.
According to German Patent Document DE 30 09 571 A1, the frontal area of a road vehicle, in particular a tram, is designed in such a way that, in the event of a collision with the vehicle, there is no possibility or a significantly reduced likelihood of a pedestrian being thrown to the side.
Finally, European Patent Document EP 0 734 908 A2 and corresponding U.S. Pat. No. 5,785,367 discloses a bumper that is designed as a beam and is supported on the longitudinal members of the body of a vehicle via deformation members of the impact-absorber type.
An aspect of the invention is to provide a bumper that is optimized with respect to the protection of pedestrians in collisions with the vehicle.
According to certain preferred embodiments of the invention, this aspect is achieved with a bumper of the type stated at the outset by virtue of the fact that the structural part is composed of foam capable of deformation and energy-absorbing compression or of a material having similar properties and a space-lattice structure that can be crushed in a manner that involves energy absorption, and is arranged between an impact or contact zone of the outer skin or shell and a rear side of the bumper facing away from the latter and having a cross section that differs from the outer skin or shell of the bumper.
The general idea of providing a very wide degree of freedom in the design of the shape of the outer skin or shell of the bumper and especially of designing the structural part with a resistance characteristic that is the optimum in collisions with pedestrians is provided. Since cross-sectional areas are left free by the structural part within the cross section of the outer skin or shell of the bumper, the material of the structural part can also be displaced quasi-hydraulically in a collision before the cross section of the generally relatively inelastic outer skin or shell, which is reduced by the respective collision, is completely filled by the material of the structural part. After the filling, absorption of the collision energy can take place basically only through the compressibility of the material of the structural part. In general, the quasi-hydraulic displacement of material and compression or crushing of the material of the structural part will take place simultaneously.
Owing to the difference in the cross sections of the outer skin or shell in the case of a flexible structural part, there is furthermore the advantage that the outer skin or shell will be displaced comparatively slightly in a tangential direction relative to the outer plane in the collision, thus enabling the consequences of a collision for a pedestrian to be significantly reduced even when the direction of the collision has a pronounced tangential component relative to the outer surface.
According to a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, a reinforcing inner part, which can expediently be in the form of a flat strip, is arranged on the rear side of the bumper. As a result, collision forces which may be affecting a small area on the outside of the bumper are dissipated to vehicle components arranged behind the bumper over a comparatively large area.
The arrangement of the reinforcing inner part is particularly expedient if the bumper rests by way of this inner part on a beam capable of deformation in an energy-absorbing manner, which is intended generally not to be deformed when the vehicle collides with a pedestrian but to yield only in the case of higher forces.
This is because, especially in combination with the reinforcing inner part, it is possible to ensure that the beam yields inelastically only at a collision or impact energy exceeding a higher threshold and that the maximum degree of deformation of the structural part upon loading of a predetermined collision or contact area is used up only in the case of impact energy exceeding this threshold. Ultimately, this is equivalent to saying that, although collision forces acting on small areas of the outside can deform the bumper into the vicinity of its rear side, they cannot readily deform the beam as well.
Other objects, advantages and novel features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the accompany drawings.
As shown in
According to certain preferred embodiments of the invention, the structural part 6 has a cross section that differs significantly from that of the outer covering 4, the cross-sectional shape of the structural part 6 being designed for optimum energy absorption when the vehicle is involved in collisions with pedestrians.
In the embodiment of
As a result, a progressively increasing resistance is produced by the foam structural part 6 in the event of horizontal impact loading in accordance with the arrow H. Moreover, an upward impact in the direction of the arrow S meets a lower resistance than a downward impact in the direction of the arrow T.
During the deformations of the foam structural part 6 caused by a collision, it is possible, on the one hand, for deformation through quasi-hydraulic displacement of material of the foam structural part to take place transversely to the respective direction of impact. On the other hand, there is also deformation involving a reduction in the volume of the foam structural part.
As long as the said deformations are relatively small, they may be reversible, i.e. the foam structural part 6 and the likewise deformed outer covering 4 can reassume their original form. However, it is important that the deformations should take place in an inelastic manner or with energy absorption, i.e. should involve conversion of mechanical impact energy into heat, and that the reverse deformation takes a relatively long time.
The embodiment shown in
Since the foam structural part 6′ is at a greater horizontal distance from the reinforcing inner part 3 in an upper region of the contact zone of the outer covering 4 than in a lower region, the foam structural part 6′ is additionally subjected to bending when horizontal collision forces initially act on the above-mentioned upper zone. In the embodiment of
The structural part 6, 6′ can be composed of a plastic foam, preferably with a closed cell structure. In principle, however, other materials are also suitable, e.g. metal foams or plastic or metal webs.
To adapt its stiffness to different conditions, the design of the structural part 6, 6′ can be varied locally across the width of the vehicle, i.e. the cross section and/or density of the material of the structural part is/are adapted to different points of impact of the pedestrian, to the respective characteristics of the vehicle structure or to integrated components such as fog lamps or supports for registration plates or the like.
The foregoing disclosure has been set forth merely to illustrate the invention and is not intended to be limiting. Since modifications of the disclosed embodiments incorporating the spirit and substance of the invention may occur to persons skilled in the art, the invention should be construed to include everything within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
101 49 121 | Oct 2001 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3722876 | Schwenk | Mar 1973 | A |
3836192 | Wilfert | Sep 1974 | A |
4328986 | Weller et al. | May 1982 | A |
4408790 | Shimoda et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4762352 | Enomoto | Aug 1988 | A |
4941701 | Loren | Jul 1990 | A |
4968076 | Kuroki | Nov 1990 | A |
4482180 | Huber et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4996634 | Haneda et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5080411 | Stewart et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5100187 | Loren | Mar 1992 | A |
5106137 | Curtis | Apr 1992 | A |
5139297 | Carpenter et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5139304 | Tajiri | Aug 1992 | A |
5201912 | Terada et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5265925 | Cox et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5785367 | Baumann et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5803514 | Shibuya et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5984389 | Nuber et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6089628 | Schuster | Jul 2000 | A |
6227582 | Ichien | May 2001 | B1 |
6412836 | Mansoor et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6474708 | Gehringhoff et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485072 | Werner et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6540275 | Iwamoto et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
20010026073 | Sato et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020180224 | Mansoor et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030020290 | Cherry | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030052493 | Ponsonnaille et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030080573 | Marijnissen et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1755512 | Sep 1974 | DE |
2505169 | Aug 1976 | DE |
2505169 | Aug 1976 | DE |
27 51 077 | May 1978 | DE |
3009571 | Sep 1981 | DE |
3009571 | Sep 1981 | DE |
32 24979 | Aug 1983 | DE |
3125687 | Sep 1984 | DE |
3626150 | Sep 1984 | DE |
43 12517 | Oct 1994 | DE |
4119640 | Feb 1996 | DE |
19806541 | Sep 1998 | DE |
10002724 | Aug 2001 | DE |
0734908 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1046546 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1046546 | Oct 2000 | EP |
2033535 | May 1980 | GB |
2 24240 | Jan 1990 | JP |
3 273957 | Dec 1991 | JP |
03273957 | Dec 1991 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030141728 A1 | Jul 2003 | US |