The invention relates to an energy-absorbing case intended to be placed between the end of a longeron of a motor vehicle and a bumper beam.
It relates more specifically to an energy-absorbing case for a motor vehicle bumper beam comprising a casing consisting of a hollow section piece which has a first end able to be attached to the bumper beam and a second end able to be fixed to the end of a motor vehicle longeron.
Current vehicles have a front end able to incorporate various vehicle equipment items such as the headlamps, the turn indicators, the horn, etc. The front end is a modular element ready to be mounted on the vehicle. It is mounted by connection to lateral structural elements of the vehicle, such as the longerons, then by fitting an added-on bumper to the module. Energy-absorbing cases are arranged between each of the longerons and the bumper beam. These absorbing cases need to satisfy strict standards so as to be able to absorb the energy of a standardized impact known by the name of Danner impact corresponding to the vehicle striking a stationary obstacle at a speed of 16 km/h. The energy is to be absorbed without the force spike sustained by the case exceeding a maximum limit of 120 kN for example.
Furthermore, the cost of insuring a motor vehicle is calculated on the basis of the cost of the repairs to be made to the vehicle after a frontal impact at 16 km/hour. The higher the repair cost, the higher the insurance premium will be. It is therefore important, in order to limit this premium for a given vehicle, for the vehicle to be capable of undergoing such a frontal impact without sustaining a great deal of damage.
Finally, modern vehicles are becoming increasingly compact and this introduces new constraints on the production of the energy-absorbing cases which have to absorb the same amount of energy in an increasingly small volume.
It is precisely an object of the present invention to respond to these various difficulties. The object of the invention is to maximize the ratios of energy absorbed with respect to the mass of the energy absorber (the energy-mass ratio) and the energy absorbed with respect to the intrusion of the object which strikes the vehicle or that the vehicle strikes (energy-intrusion ratio). Maximizing these ratios makes it possible to reduce the damage suffered by a front end of a vehicle in a frontal impact and therefore the repair cost and the insurance premium.
These objects are achieved, according to the invention, through the fact that the casing is filled with a metal foam with energy-absorption properties, the density of which is between 0.1 g/cm3 and 0.4 g/cm3.
By virtue of the interaction of the foam and the deformation of the casing, the energy absorbed by a small-volume energy-absorbing case is maximized. This results in a reduction in the size of the vehicle. Furthermore, the foam makes it possible to reduce the thickness of the casing and therefore the mass of the absorbing case, together with the overhang of the vehicle.
In an advantageous embodiment, the cross section of the casing is rectangular, particularly square. In another embodiment, the cross section of the casing is circular. The case may be made of aluminum or of steel.
When the cross section of the case is square, the side of this square is advantageously between 50 and 80 mm long, which corresponds to a cross-sectional area of between 2500 mm2 and 6400 mm2.
The length of the case is advantageously between 80 mm and 200 mm and its thickness between 1.5 mm and 3 mm.
Other characteristics and advantages of the invention will become further apparent from reading the description which follows of some exemplary embodiments given by way of illustration with reference to the attached figures. In these figures:
An energy-absorbing case with a thickness of 2.9 mm and a length L of 130 mm was made out of aluminum. The weight of this case was 460 grams. The case incorporating the towing eye had a mass of 540 grams. An absorbing case with a thickness of 1.8 mm and a length L of between 100 and 120 mm was also made out of steel. The weight of this case was 0.8 kg and 1.12 kg for the case incorporating the towing eye.
An energy-absorbing case with a square cross section of 2500 mm2 (sides 50 mm long) was produced. The density of the foam was between 0.2 and 0.4 g/cm3. Under these conditions, for a length L less than or equal to 80 mm and a case thickness e of between 2.2 mm and 3 mm, the energy-mass ratio was below or equal to 40 and the energy-intrusion ratio was below or equal to 120.
For a case length L of between 80 and 140 mm and a thickness e of between 1.5 mm and 2.3 mm, the energy-mass ratio was between 20 and 40 and/or the energy-intrusion ratio was between 75 and 120. Optimized performance was obtained for a density D of between 0.2 and 0.4 g/cm3.
For an energy-absorbing case with a length L of between 140 mm and 200 mm and a thickness e of between 1.5 mm and 2.3 mm, the energy absorption-mass ratio was between 10 and 20 and/or the energy-intrusion ratio was between 45 and 75.
Several energy-absorbing cases of square cross section with a surface area of between 2500 mm2 and 6400 mm2 were produced, this corresponding to a square with a side length of between 50 mm and 80 mm, the density of the foam varying between 0.2 g/cm3 and 0.4 g/cm3.
For a case with a length L less than or equal to 80 mm and a thickness e of between 2.2 mm and 3 mm, the absorption-mass ratio was below or equal to 25 and/or the energy-intrusion ratio was below or equal to 105.
For a case with a length L of between 80 mm and 140 mm and a thickness e of between 1.5 mm and 2.3 mm, the energy-absorption ratio was between 12 and 25 and/or the energy-intrusion ratio was between 65 and 105.
For a case with a length L of between 140 mm and 200 mm and a thickness e of between 1.5 mm and 2.3 mm, the energy-mass ratio was between 10 and 15 and/or the energy-intrusion ratio was between 55 and 85 for an absorbent metal foam density of between 0.15 g/cm3 and 0.35 g/cm3.
In all cases, performance was optimized for a metal foam density of between 0.1 and 0.4 g/cm3, particularly between 0.1 and 0.3 g/cm3 (the value of 0.3 g/cm3 being excluded). Advantageously, the density of the metal foam was more or less equal to 0.25 g/cm3.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
02 16855 | Dec 2002 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR03/03882 | 12/23/2003 | WO | 00 | 6/27/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/060724 | 7/22/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3888502 | Felzer et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
20020066254 | Ebbinghaus | Jun 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060071488 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |