Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
1. Field of Invention
Exercise Device 482/51, 72, 901
Conventional Indoor Rowing Machines (also referred to as “Ergometers” or “Ergs”) generally consist of a horizontally translating seat on rollers 3 riding on a rigid frame 1, a resistance device (typically a rotary device) 4 connected to a pull handle 10 also mounted in-line to the seat on said frame. Foot mounts or stretchers 5 are also positioned appropriately on the rigid frame. The user secures his or her feet to the stretchers 5 and with his or her legs, back, arms, and hands, pulls via the handle on the resistance device to approximate forces on the body similar to the on-water rowing experience. These devices are widely used by the rowing community throughout the year typically with peak usage in colder months.
The Ergs are used for training and for measuring progress of rowers' conditioning as they train over the winter months. During the rowing season, Ergs are used to supplement on-water workouts to maximize conditioning. In addition, among the competitive rowing teams, the “Erg scores” are used as selection criteria of rowers for the fastest boats in various competitions. Also Erg scores are used for comparison of rowers across the country as part of the selection process for the national team boats. The standard used to measure erg scores is a static rowing machine. Thus, coaches need to be able to quickly and easily remove any and all rowing machine accessories and training aids from the rowing machine in order to accurately record and evaluate their rowers' erg scores. These Erg machines are also used by the non-rowing community for general fitness.
Conventional Ergs suffer from several deficiencies as compared to what is experienced in a rowing craft or boat (also referred to as a “Shell”):
The present invention is an energy absorbing suspension for a rowing machine which addresses conventional erg deficiencies by simulating the on-water motions of a boat through the additions of responsive and compliant roll, pitch, and yaw motions throughout the entire rowing stroke (
Since a conventional erg does not offer roll, pitch, and yaw motions, the rower cannot train the same way on the land as on the water, where these motions impact rowing a shell as effectively as possible. When a shell pitches, the bow (front) and stem (rear) of the shell alternately move up and down in an angular motion in response to the rower movements at both the catch and the finish portions of the stroke. The smoother the rower's motions are at the center of rotation, in a plane along the center of the hull, the less pitching the shell will endure. Additionally, as the rower traverses back and forth along the hull, they attempt to do so with very little side-to-side (roll) motion. Rowing with good roll balance allows both oars to stay off the water during the recovery which reduces drag and also allows for optimum power when driving the oars through the water. When pressure is applied to the oars through the rower's push on the boat, even force from both sides of the body is necessary to keep the shell from turning (yawing) about its line of direction. As the shell yaws, a steering correction is required thus slowing the shell down. By minimizing all of these motions, through good rowing technique, the shell will move faster and more efficiently. Therefore, the adding of responsive roll, pitch, and yaw to the erg gives the rower greater opportunity to improve their rowing motion when they cannot be on the water.
2. Related Art
The rowing industry standard for Ergometers is the Concept2, manufactured by Concept2 in Morrisville, Vt. under U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,396,188, 4,875,674, 7,201,708. Numerous alternatives to this embodiment have been developed under such patents as U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,884,800, 4,880,224, 4,772,013, and 4,743,011. Most Ergs have been developed on a stationary frame. A significant drawback to the stationary frame is that it does not provide the energy absorbing downward motion that is experienced in an on-water rowing craft. Numerous studies have indicated that there are a variety of injuries suffered by rowers training on Ergometers (“Impact of Ergometer Design on Hip & Trunk Muscle Activity”, Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2005, “Rowing: Injury Prevention and Management”, Australian Institute of Sport).
In an effort to better simulate the on-water experience, the RowPerfect Ergometer, U.S. Pat. No. 5,382,210, was developed with frame and resistance elements that move with the rower in the horizontal direction. Additionally, Concept2 offers a slide as an accessory to their Ergometer to provide a similar horizontal motion. While the horizontal motion embodied in these two developments does improve the feel to a row on the water, they still do not provide any vertical energy absorption that the on-water experience also provides.
Another approach, U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,270,630, 6,991,589, attempts to maximize the exercise experience by varying the front and the back elevation of an Erg to provide an inclined path in both the drive and the recovery portion of the stroke. This design provides vertical movement but only as a fixed position not providing vertical compliance during the stroke.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,441,469(Chern) employs the use of two hydraulic cylinders mounted to a collapsible foot linkage in the rear of a sculling ergometer. In concert with this linkage are two rigid columns centrally mounted in line to the middle and front of the Erg frame. The purpose of this integrated Erg design is to provide a rocking motion at the rear of said machine that better simulates the on-water motion of a shell via the passive resistance of the hydraulic cylinder motion. While Chern offers roll throughout the stroke, pitch compliance is only provided at the finish (the rear of the Erg) since when the rower moves forward on said machine it rocks downward onto a rigid column at the catch. In contrast, the invention described herein provides responsive and compliant roll, pitch, and yaw motion throughout the entire stroke to any rigid frame rowing machine to better simulate the rowing motion one feels in a boat on the water.
Additional on-water experience add-on aftermarket devices have been designed for the Ergometer that simulate the side to side roll motion that is experienced when on the water. One such device is an adaptation to the Erg seat, Core Perform (U.S. Pat. No. 7,452,314), that provides compliance about the fore and aft, or drive axis of the Erg. Another embodiment of this approach is WILIS by Row Balance (U.S. Pat. No. 7,946,964) which features a pivot cradle that the Erg is placed in. This allows the entire Erg, not just the seat, to pivot about the drive axis also simulating the side to side motion experienced on the water. While these devices do provide roll motion, neither of these devices provide any compliance in either roll, pitch, or yaw and therefore offer no protection to the rower from the harshness of a rigid rowing machine.
Another invention that attempts to simulate the on-water experience, Yang (U.S. Pat. No. 4,650,181), offers two degrees of motion, in which Yang refers to as bowing and waving. The first motion is a responsive motion to the rowers movements, pitch compliance, through the use of cushioning springs and the other is a forced, rigid, roll motion through the use of uneven rails. Yang's central fulcrum stand constrains the motion of the base which in turn constrains the motions of the entire device and rower to pitch only by means of the cushioning springs. The second motion offered by Yang's invention is to forcibly roll the rower side to side by riding over the asymmetric, uneven rails of the base throughout the entire rowing motion to ‘increase the player's interest’. Yang's forced roll motion makes it impossible for the rower to make the necessary neuromuscular compensations to attempt a smooth, balanced rowing stroke. Unlike the Yang invention, the EASE invention described here within responds to all of the rower's movements by giving proportional motion feedback in all three degrees of motion (roll, pitch, and yaw). This feedback from the EASE allows the rower to respond and correct their balance. Balanced posture throughout the rower's motion is one of the main objectives of proper rowing on the water.
The invention described herein relates to an Energy Absorbing Suspension Equipment (hereinafter also referred to by the acronym “EASE”) for use in conjunction with a rowing machine. In one embodiment, the energy-absorbing suspension equipment comprises an energy absorbing component, which is configured into an aftermarket device that is separate and removable from the rowing machine. The energy absorbing component has a first shape in the absence of a force applied by a user configured to change shape so as to absorb energy in response to application of a compressive force by the user and is configured to return to substantially its first shape in response to the removal of the compressive force. The EASE apparatus is configured to add responsive and compliant roll, pitch, and yaw motions to the rowing machine. The energy-absorbing suspension equipment also comprises a first locating structure configured to join the energy-absorbing suspension equipment to the rowing machine and a second locating structure configured to permit the energy-absorbing suspension equipment to be located on a rigid support. The energy-absorbing suspension equipment is configured to reduce a reaction force exerted on the user of the rowing machine. In one embodiment, the user does not need any tools to start using the EASE apparatus with the rowing machine as there is no assembly required and the rowing machine does not require any modifications.
In another embodiment, the energy-absorbing suspension equipment is integrated into a rowing machine which includes an energy absorbing component wherein the said energy absorbing component provides responsive and compliant roll, pitch, and yaw motions throughout the entire rowing stroke.
The forgoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of particular embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis being placed on illustrating the principles of the invention.
While it is conventional to operate such indoor rowing machines inside a structure, there is in principle no reason why such a rowing machine cannot also be used in the outdoors, for example in a location where there is no conveniently located body of water of sufficient size to permit rowing a boat on water.
As mentioned previously, mechanisms that address the deficiencies related to boat balance and horizontal compliance have been offered by several manufacturers. However, the combination of vertical energy absorption and side-to-side balance for both the finish and catch portions of the stroke has not been adapted to Erg designs for new machines or as after-market attachments for existing machines.
In the conventional Erg, the rower begins a stroke substantially in the position shown in
This jerk is a consequence of the fact that the Erg frame rests on a hard floor surface that provides little or no energy absorption, nor does it allow motion as is experienced in a waterborne shell. Depending on the exercise goals of a user, it is common that one operates an Erg at a typical stroke rate in the range of 15 to 40 strokes per minute and Erg workouts ranging from 10 to 60 minutes in duration. Under such conditions, significant spinal compression can be experienced by the typical rower, which he or she would not be normally be subjected to in a rowing shell operated on water.
The EASE invention described herein provides the equivalent vertical energy absorption experienced by on-water rowers, for the indoor rower. Some of the benefits and advantages of adding an EASE mechanism to an Erg are:
One embodiment of this invention, the EASE, can be provided as an aftermarket apparatus for a conventional Erg, as shown in
Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/146,829
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
199432 | Goldie | Jan 1878 | A |
335597 | Libbey | Feb 1886 | A |
2183345 | Brandon | Dec 1939 | A |
2565615 | McCoy | Aug 1951 | A |
3324815 | Morales | Jun 1967 | A |
3586322 | Kverneland | Jun 1971 | A |
4396188 | Dreissigacker et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4650181 | Yang | Mar 1987 | A |
4743011 | Coffey | May 1988 | A |
4772013 | Tarlow, Jr. | Sep 1988 | A |
4875674 | Dreissigacker et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4880224 | Jonas et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4884800 | Duke | Dec 1989 | A |
4889509 | Pohlus | Dec 1989 | A |
5122105 | Engel et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5382210 | Rekers | Jan 1995 | A |
5441469 | Chern | Aug 1995 | A |
5695421 | Fukuda | Dec 1997 | A |
5762584 | Daniels | Jun 1998 | A |
5779600 | Pape | Jul 1998 | A |
5827155 | Jensen et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6527676 | Frick et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6602168 | Duke | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6991589 | Patterson | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7201708 | Dreissigacker et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7270630 | Patterson | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7452314 | Mills et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7731637 | D'Eredita | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7828706 | Medina | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846067 | Hanoun | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7946964 | Gothro et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
20030153437 | Tseng | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20050085348 | Kiefer et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050101450 | Gramaccioni | May 2005 | A1 |
20050170711 | Spencer et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070197347 | Roach | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090181832 | Bell | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100190615 A1 | Jul 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61146829 | Jan 2009 | US |