The present invention relates to flexure mechanism such as, for example, a flexure joint of a surgical tool. Because a flexure joint bends by elastic deformation of a structure, force is required to maintain the position of a flexure joint and to prevent it from returning to its original, non-deformed shape.
Joints that involve elastic deformation of a structure in order to operation (e.g., “flexure joints”) can be used in various applications including, for example, robotic and manually actuated surgical arms, manipulators, flexible scopes, and catheters. The elastic deformation of the structure causes that joints/structure to act like a compressed spring. This spring energy is typically felt by either the user or servo motor as a constant force pushing back against the controls and trying to return the joint/structure to its unbent state. Because of the constant force needed to actuate and hold the continuum joint in a deformed position, flexure joints alone are not practical for use with manual tool.
In one embodiment, the invention provides a mechanical energy balance of a flexure joint. This balance mechanism balances the joint's potential energy such that the user/servo motor no longer needs to resist a constant restoring force. In some embodiments, the flexure joint includes a continuum joint integrated into a dexterous laparoscopic manipulator such as, for example, an elbow joint in a surgical tool. In some embodiments, the energy balance mechanism includes a joint, a control handle, and a spring mechanism. The joint is a flexure joint that elastically stores energy when deformed. The control handle moves above the joint and controls the movement of the joint. The force required to move the control handle is mechanically linked to the joint. The spring mechanism is attached to the control handle and provides energy balance.
In another embodiment, the invention provides a tool including an elastically deformable flexure joint, a control joint, and an energy balance system. The control joint is mechanically linked to the flexure joint such that movement of the control joint causes a corresponding deformation of the flexure joint. The energy balance system provides a spring force to aid movement of the control joint and to overcome an elastic force required to deform the flexure joint.
In yet another embodiment, the invention provides a surgical tool that includes a hollow shaft and an end effector coupled to the distal end of the hollow shaft by an elastically deformable flexure joint. A joint control arm is coupled to the proximal end of the hollow shaft by a control joint. The control joint is mechanically coupled to the flexure joint such that movement of the control joint causes a corresponding deformation of the flexure joint. An energy balance system provides a spring force that aids movement of the control joint and overcomes an elastic force required to deform the flexure joint.
Other aspects of the invention will become apparent by consideration of the detailed description and accompanying drawings.
Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways.
In addition to a mechanical wrist joint incorporated into the gripper structure 103 itself, the tool 100 includes a flexure joint 107 positioned between the gripper 103 and the hollow shaft 101. The flexure joint 107 as described in further detail below includes a deformable portion of a continuum shaft. The bend and shape of the flexure joint 107 is controlled by moving the flex joint control handle 109. In particular, the joint control handle 109 is bent relative to the shaft 101 at control joint 111. Due to the structure of the continuum shaft, the flexure joint 107 bends in response to a bend at the control joint 111 such that the base of the gripper 103 remains substantially parallel with the flex joint control handle 109. The control joint 111 allows the flex joint control handle 109 to move with two degrees of freedom. Therefore, the flexure joint 107 is also capable of moving with two degrees of freedom.
When the control joint 111 is bent in a first direction, it pushes the secondary tubes on the right side of the continuum shaft and pulls the secondary tubes on the left side fo the continuum shaft. Because the hollow shaft 101 (of
In this example, each secondary tube is a hollow structure formed of a nitonol material. Each secondary tube has a 1.8 mm outer diameter and a 1.4 mm inner diameter. Movement of the control joint 111 causes a circular bend arc at the flexure joint 107 and the secondary tubes exhibit negligible stretching. The disc 201 has a diameter of 6 mm and the length of the flexure joint is 15 mm along the centerline. The difference between bends along the blue axis (in
The spring 613 applies its force along the centerline of the hollow shaft 601 and the flex joint control arm 609. As with the one degree of freedom example of
Although the example of
As shown in
Although not specifically labeled in
As discussed in detail above, the secondary tubes of the continuum shaft are relatively resistant to bending. However, when bending does occur, excessive force can cause the secondary tubes to break. Therefore, the control joint mechanisms of the surgical tool 700 provides a third gimbal structure that maintains a degree of separation between the first gimbal 715 and the second gimbal 717 and prevents the spring force (from springs 813) from causing the secondary tubes of the continuum shaft to break. The third gimbal in this example of
A cam wheel 911 is positioned at the control joint. It is fixedly coupled to the control arm 909 and, therefore, pivots with the control arm 909 relative to the hollow shaft 901. A cable 913 wraps around the outer surface of the cam 911 with each end coupled to a spring 915, 917. The opposite end of each spring 915, 917 is coupled to an anchor point 919 which is fixedly coupled to the hollow shaft 901. The cam wheel 911 is shaped and positioned such that one surface 921 has a larger radius than the others. This enlarged radius surface 921 is positioned such that it is facing away from the end effector 903 when the control arm 909 is at a centered position. As a result, the spring force provided by the springs 915, 917 is the greatest when the control arm 909 is centered and the cam profile works to move the handle away from centered. As the control arm 909 is pivoted, the cam wheel 911 rotates and the effective pulley diameters are changed. Thus, the two springs 915, 917 are balanced when the control arm 909 is centered. When the control arm 909 is deflected, one cam increases in diameter and thus pulls harder on the lever as compared to the other cam. The cam wheel 911 is sized and the springs 915, 917 are selected such that the increase in cam diameter overcomes the decrease in spring force as the spring stretch is decreased.
In this example, the spring 1025 is coupled to the hollow shaft 1001 at a point that is further from the control joint 1011 than the point of coupling between the coupling link 1021 and the hollow shaft 1001. Therefore, the length of the spring 1025 decreases as the control joint 1011 is further deflected. As a result, the force provided by the spring 1025 pulls the control arm 1009 away from center and counter balances the force required to deform the secondary tubes of the continuum shaft.
Thus, the invention provides, among other things, an energy balance mechanism for a flexure joint that counteract the elastic force caused by deformation of the flexure joint. Various features and advantages of the invention are set forth in the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/877,391, filed Sep. 13, 2013, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4315650 | Yoshida | Feb 1982 | A |
5286228 | Lee et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5468250 | Paraschac et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5599151 | Daum et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5813813 | Daum et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
6322578 | Houle et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
7090637 | Danitz et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7338513 | Lee | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7372229 | Farritor et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7373219 | Nowlin et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7386365 | Nixon | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7404716 | Gregorio et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7410483 | Danitz et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
8617203 | Stefanchik et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20060020288 | Leonard | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070225754 | Measamer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080065106 | Larkin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071288 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071290 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071291 | Duval et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080140129 | Dalton | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20100198253 | Jinno et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100298864 | Castro | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110106145 | Jeong | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1438097 | Aug 2003 | CN |
2917558 | Jul 2007 | CN |
11011292 | Aug 2007 | CN |
2008041227 | Apr 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Radius Surgical System surgical tool, publicly available prior to Apr. 29, 2011. |
Novare RealHand surgical tool, publicly available prior to Apr. 29, 2011. |
Neuroarm surgical system, http://www.neuroarm.org/, publicly available prior to Apr. 29, 2011. |
ZEUS Robotic Surgical System, https://web.archive.org/web/20030205054707/http://computermotion.com/zeus.html, publicly available prior to Apr. 29, 2011. |
QuadPort multi-instrument access port, http://www.advancedsurgical.ie/QuadPort/Default.544.html, publicly available prior to Apr. 29, 2011. |
Triport product, http://www.advancedsurgical.ie/TriPort_15/Default.595.html; information available prior to Apr. 29, 2011. |
AESOP 3000 System, https://web.archive.org/web/20030203213235/http://computermotion.com/aesop.html, publicly available prior to Apr. 29, 2011. |
ROBODOC Surgical Robot, http://www.robodoc.com/professionals.html, publicly available prior to Apr. 29, 2011. |
Bhaheetharan, Sujan et al., “Minimally Invasive Surgery Tool,” http://homepages.cae.wisc.edu/˜bme200/robotic_arm_fall05/reports/BME_mid_sem_report.pdf (Oct. 18, 2005). |
Humphries, Courtney, “New Tools for Minimally Invasive Surgery,” MIT Technology Review (Aug. 9, 2006). |
Children's Hospital Boston, “Minimally Invasive Heart Surgery Research Wins $5 million NIH Award,” http://www.childrenshospital.org/newsroom/Site1339/mainpageS1339P1sublevel340.html (Sep. 5, 2007). |
Jaspers, Joris, “Cheaper and Simpler Keyhole Surgery,” Delft University of Technology (Mar. 21, 2006) http://www.tudelft.org/en/current/latest-news/article/detail/kijkoperaties-goedkoper-en-eenvoudiger/. |
Diks, J. et al., “The mechanical master-slave manipulator: an instrument improving the performance in standardized tasks for endoscopic surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 21, No. 6 1025-1031 (Jun. 2007). |
“Startup's device may change surgery,” The News & Observer (Jan. 8, 2008) http://satellite.tmcnet.com/news/2008/01/08/3200080.htm. |
“Trends in the noninvasive and minimally invasive medical device market,” BCC Research (Jun. 2006) http://www.surgicenteronline.com/articles/751feat3.html. |
Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc., http://www.ethiconendo.com/dtcf/pages/innovative_products.htm; information available prior to Apr. 29, 2011. |
Mectra Labs, Inc., About Mectra http://www.mectralabs.com/aboutMectra.cfm; information available prior to Apr. 29, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150080908 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61877391 | Sep 2013 | US |