Patent Grant
12247473
Disclosed are systems and methods to control erosion during hydraulic fracturing stimulation treatment. Specifically, disclosed are systems and methods to control erosion by dissipating energy of the hydraulic fracturing stimulation treatment while maintaining velocity and pressure at the point of stimulation fluid introduction into the wellhead.
The evolution of hydraulic fracturing treatment has gravitated towards the delivery of more aggressive stimulation treatment to the formation to ensure the creation of greater levels of effective stimulated areas and conductivity. This is typically achieved through the delivery of stimulation at higher pumping rates. The challenge would be to deliver the higher pumping rates through existing well infrastructure while ensuring full well pressure containment throughout the entire stimulation delivery period. The biggest threat towards achieving full well containment throughout the high rate stimulation delivery would be the erosive effects of the stimulation treatment on the stimulation delivery equipment and wellhead itself.
Disclosed are systems and methods to control erosion during hydraulic fracturing stimulation treatment. Specifically, disclosed are systems and methods to control erosion by dissipating energy of the hydraulic fracturing stimulation treatment while maintaining velocity and pressure at the point of stimulation fluid introduction into the wellhead.
In a first aspect, a method for reducing kinetic energy of an energized stimulation fluid upstream of a wellbore is provided. The method includes the steps of introducing the energized stimulation fluid to an energy dissipating flow block installed in a frac tree. The energy dissipating flow block includes a body, the body having an internal geometry configured to produce cyclonic flow of the energized stimulation fluid, the body includes a top and a body, an inlet nozzle, the inlet nozzle positioned proximate and parallel to the top of the body, the inlet nozzle is configured to receive the energized stimulation fluid, a cushioning sub, the cushioning sub positioned parallel to the top of the body and opposite the inlet nozzle, and an outlet nozzle, the outlet nozzle positioned perpendicular to the bottom of the body. The method further includes the steps of reducing the kinetic energy of the energized stimulation fluid in the energy dissipating flow block due to the cyclonic flow in the body to produce a stimulation fluid, introducing the stimulation fluid to a frac tree, the frac tree fluidly connected to the outlet nozzle of the energy dissipating flow block, and introducing the stimulation fluid to the wellbore through the frac tree.
In certain aspects, a fluid velocity of the stimulation fluid is reduced compared to the energized stimulation fluid. In certain aspects, a Reynolds number of the stimulation fluid is reduced compared to the energized stimulation fluid. In certain aspects, a flow rate of the stimulation fluid is the same as a flow rate of the energized stimulation fluid. In certain aspects, the cyclonic flow follows a cyclonic flow path trajectory in the body.
In a second aspect a device for reducing kinetic energy of an energized stimulation fluid upstream of a wellbore is provided. The device includes a body, the body having an internal geometry configured to produce cyclonic flow of the energized stimulation fluid, the body includes a top and a body, an inlet nozzle, the inlet nozzle positioned proximate and parallel to the top of the body, the inlet nozzle is configured to receive the energized stimulation fluid, a cushioning sub, the cushioning sub positioned parallel to the top of the body and opposite the inlet nozzle, and an outlet nozzle, the outlet nozzle positioned perpendicular to the bottom of the body.
In certain aspects, the internal geometry of the body is selected from the group consisting of a conical frustum, a pyramidal frustum, a polyhedron, and combinations of the same. In certain aspects, the device further includes monoflex hose fluidly connected to the inlet nozzle. In certain aspects, the inlet nozzle meets the requirements of API 6A. In certain aspects, the cushioning sub meets the requirements of API 6A. In certain aspects, the outlet nozzle meets the requirements of API 6A.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the scope will become better understood with regard to the following descriptions, claims, and accompanying drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the drawings illustrate only several embodiments and are therefore not to be considered limiting of the scope as it can admit to other equally effective embodiments.
In the accompanying Figures, similar components or features, or both, may have a similar reference label.
While the scope of the apparatus and method will be described with several embodiments, it is understood that one of ordinary skill in the relevant art will appreciate that many examples, variations and alterations to the apparatus and methods described here are within the scope and spirit of the embodiments.
Accordingly, the embodiments described are set forth without any loss of generality, and without imposing limitations, on the embodiments. Those of skill in the art understand that the scope includes all possible combinations and uses of particular features described in the specification.
The systems and methods described aim to mitigate the threat of erosion by introducing a means to dissipate the energy of the stimulation treatment, while maintaining full delivery pressure, at the point of stimulation fluid introduction into the wellhead. The energy dissipating allows the stimulation fluid to maintain its velocity and pressure, while dissipating the energy that would contribute to erosion. Advantageously and unexpectedly, this is achieved by subjecting the fluid path, through a pressure contained flow block, to an induced cyclonic flow direction, thereby increasing the flow travel distance within a limited and workable dimension. In addition, the fluid flow path is not subjected to sharp changes in flow path trajectory, thus eliminating abrupt energy transfer through a sharp increase in fluid turbulence level. Advantageously, the energy dissipated throughout the increased flow travel distance in a cyclonic trajectory effectively eliminates erosion and ensures pressure retention capability throughout the well stimulation cycle. Advantageously, the energy dissipating flow block provides a means for the optimum and efficient dissipating of energy at the point of stimulation fluid introduction into a wellhead. Advantageously, the energy dissipating flow block provides a means to direct the flow trajectory of the stimulation fluid into a cyclonic flow allowing for maximum fluid travel distance and eliminates abrupt flow trajectory changes. Advantageously, the energy dissipating flow block can be used in conjunction with permanently installed wellhead components. Advantageously, the energy dissipating flow block eliminates the threat of well pressure containment loss due to erosion, while maintaining the same permanently deployed wellhead components. Advantageously, the energy dissipating flow block can increase flow rate of the stimulation fluid without increasing the primary bore size, which would necessitate replacement of component parts on the frac tree.
As used throughout, “cyclonic flow” or “cyclonic flow path trajectory” refers to circular flow that travels along the walls in a spiral from the inlet to the outlet. Cyclonic flow exerts a centripetal force.
As used throughout, “frac tree” refers to a specific type of Christmas tree for use in hydraulic fracturing that typically consists of a number of different types of valves arranged so as to manage the flow rates and pressures necessary for hydraulic fracturing.
Referring to
Inlet nozzle 4 can be any type of connection that meets the requirements of API 6A and promotes cyclonic flow. Inlet nozzle 4 is positioned proximate and parallel to top 2 of body 1 of energy dissipating flow block 10. Inlet nozzle 4 is asymmetrical or non-concentric to the centerline of body 1 of energy dissipating flow block 10. The positioning of inlet nozzle 4 induces cyclonic flow of the stimulation fluid. In at least one embodiment, inlet nozzle 4 is an eccentric inlet. Inlet nozzle 4 can include monoflex hose 7. Monoflex hose 7 connects energy dissipating flow block 10 to the surface frac circuit.
Cushioning sub 5 is positioned parallel to top 2 of body 1 of energy dissipating flow block 10 and across from inlet nozzle 4 in the shortest straight line distance. Cushioning sub 5 provides a damping effect to the energized stimulation fluid entering energy dissipating flow block 10. Fluids with limited compressibility, but with some measure of dampening, will occupy the cushioning sub that is strategically placed in the direct primary flowpath. The fluid will occupy the volume of the cushioning sub and provide the function of dampening any subsequent fluid entry into the body of the energy dissipating flow block. Because the fluid occupying the cushioning sub is unable to travel anywhere else its lack of compressibility will in turn act as a temporary baffle to redirect any subsequent fluid entering the body to follow a direction of travel governed by the geometric shape of the body. Cushioning sub 5 is any type of fitting that meets the API 6A standards.
Outlet nozzle 6 can be any type of connection the meets the requirements of API 6A. Outlet nozzle 6 is sized to connect to frac tree 8.
Referring to
Energy dissipating flow block 10 can be used for the entire duration of the well stimulation delivery cycle. The installation of energy dissipating flow block 1 can increase the flow rate of the stimulation fluid entering the wellbore by at least 5 vol %, alternately by at least 10 vol %, alternately by at least 15 vol %, alternately by at least 20 vol %, alternately by at least 25 vol %, and alternately by between 5 vol % and 25 vol % compared to a system without an energy dissipating flow block 10.
Increasing the flow rate of the stimulation fluid can achieve increased effective stimulation areas and greater well conductivity with the same installed equipment, which can increase operational efficiency.
The energy dissipating flow block as described is not a cyclonic separator or hydrocyclone separator. The energy dissipating flow block is in the absence of separation means.
According to a prophetic example, the inlet nozzle and cushioning sub would each be a 7 1/16″×15 M connection. The outlet nozzle would be a 5⅛″×15 M connection. Each of these connections are API 6A compliant connections. The size of these connections are selected to fit an existing frac tree. Dimensions could enable increase in flow rate from 92 barrels per minute to 120 barrels per minute without loss of pressure containment.
Although the present invention has been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, and alterations can be made hereupon without departing from the principle and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention should be determined by the following claims and their appropriate legal equivalents.
There various elements described can be used in combination with all other elements described here unless otherwise indicated.
The singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” include plural referents, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
Optional or optionally means that the subsequently described event or circumstances may or may not occur. The description includes instances where the event or circumstance occurs and instances where it does not occur.
Ranges may be expressed here as from about one particular value to about another particular value and are inclusive unless otherwise indicated. When such a range is expressed, it is to be understood that another embodiment is from the one particular value to the other particular value, along with all combinations within said range.
Throughout this application, where patents or publications are referenced, the disclosures of these references in their entireties are intended to be incorporated by reference into this application, in order to more fully describe the state of the art to which the invention pertains, except when these references contradict the statements made here.
As used here and in the appended claims, the words “comprise,” “has,” and “include” and all grammatical variations thereof are each intended to have an open, non-limiting meaning that does not exclude additional elements or steps.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4169504 | Scott | Oct 1979 | A |
| 6575247 | Tolman | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 8786113 | Tinnen et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 9004104 | Ungchusri | Apr 2015 | B2 |
| 9127535 | Coyle et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 10086385 | Kvamsdal et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
| 10294766 | Saleh | May 2019 | B2 |
| 10876376 | Robinson | Dec 2020 | B2 |
| 11365615 | Yeung et al. | Jun 2022 | B2 |
| 20160060997 | Thomas | Mar 2016 | A1 |
| 20170002620 | Roesner | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20230085124 | Zhong et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2016113391 | Jul 2016 | WO |
