This patent application is the U.S. National Stage of International Patent Application No. PCT/N02018/000014, filed Jun. 29, 2018, which claims the benefit of Norwegian Patent Application No. 20171115, filed Jul. 6, 2017, which are each incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to power/energy harvesting. More specifically the invention relates to a turbine for converting fluid flow based forces to rotational power.
A turbine is typically defined as any of various types of machines in which the kinetic energy of a moving fluid is converted into mechanical energy by causing a bladed rotor to rotate. The moving fluid may be water, steam, air, combustion products of a fuel, etc. The traditional turbine however depends on a specific moving direction of the fluid.
Related prior art is disclosed in WO2014175613, KR20130085769, GB2498973, KR1020040055534, GB840543, US2008226451A, KR1020130027183A, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,037,268A, 4,720,239, and US2010296944.
The disclosed invention relates to a power harvesting device comprising at least one rotor mounted rotatably on a corresponding fixture on a base structure. The device is at least partially submerged in a moving fluid and arranged to convert tangential components of fluid dynamic forces of the moving fluid into a first torque component onto the rotor through rotor vanes. The inventive feature are rotor blades being arranged on or between the first rotor vanes to deflect axially moving fluid into a tangential direction to create a second torque component onto the rotor in the same direction as the first torque component.
For the power harvesting device the first and second torque components provide rotational power to the rotor, which rotor is connected to and drives a power converter which outputs a power carrier to be transferred to a remote location.
In the power harvesting device the power converter and power carrier combination can be an electrical generator and electrical power, or a pump and a pressurized fluid.
The moving fluid for the power harvesting device can be water and the fluid dynamic forces then are caused by waves, current or a combination thereof; or the moving fluid can be air and the fluid dynamic forces are caused by wind.
The base structure of the power harvesting device can be one of a structure installed fixed on ground or a floating structure being moored to ground. The ground can be dry ground or the bottom of a water body.
The base structure of the power harvesting device can be arranged for additional functions beyond being base structure for the rotor(s); name it can carry wind turbines, wireless communication or navigation equipment, support equipment for offshore activities and similar.
For ease of maintenance and set-up, the rotor of the power harvesting device is connectable to or disconnectable from the base structure as substantially one single unit.
The shape of the vanes and/or the shape of the blades (6) and/or a rotational momentum of the rotor of the power harvesting device can be dynamically adjustable to optimize the amount of power absorbed from the moving fluid.
Even the power converter of the power harvesting device can have its own converter rotational momentum allowing disconnecting the rotor from the power converter when the rotor decelerates.
The disclosed invention relates also to a system comprising a plurality of power harvesting devices where the devices are connected to each other for a common transport of the power carrier to a remote location.
Below, various embodiments of the invention will be described with reference to the figures, in which
With reference to
With reference to
For the number and shape of vanes 5 and blades 6 or their combined and integrated shape many different designs may be used, which all can result in a one-way rotation of the rotor 2 around the shaft 3.
A rotor without blades 6 but with vanes 5 only could resemble a prior art Savonius-type rotor or a cup-anemometer style rotor.
The amount of energy extracted from the fluid motion depends on the efficiency of the shape of the rotor 2 and its vanes 5 and blades 6. Especially the shape of the vanes 5 affects the energy take out, since the vanes 5 will move both with the moving fluid and against the moving fluid. When moving with the fluid the vanes 5 should have a bucket-like (i.e., having a semicircular arc) shape that maximizes the absorption of the kinetic energy in the moving fluid 1, while when moving against the fluid the vanes 5 should be have a shape that minimizes the absorption of the kinetic energy in the moving fluid 1. The difference in the energy absorbed by the part moving with the fluid and the energy absorbed by the part moving against the fluid substantially determines the overall efficiency of the device. Compared to a device with a fixed and unchangeable shape of the rotor 2, a higher efficiency can be obtained if the shape of the vanes 5 can be actively or passively adjusted depending on the motion direction of each vane 5 relative to the ambient fluid 1.
It may also be beneficial to shape the rotor 2 such that the kinetic energy of the moving fluid 1 is more evenly absorbed by the rotor along its length, i.e. along the shaft 3. This may especially be beneficial if the objective is to extract the energy from ocean waves 15, where the motion of the sea water 14 decreases with increasing distance from average sea level. The vanes 5 and the blades 6 should then be made larger in the lower part of the rotor 2 than in the upper part of the rotor 2.
Location of the rotor 2 relative to the still water sea surface and the wave zone is a balance of several factors, such as amount of energy to be absorbed from the waves 15 versus design issues such as wear and tear, fatigue, overloading, risk for impact with surface going vessels, other types of damages/collisions, etc.
With reference to
The wave force, especially, varies in strength throughout the wave period. In addition, it varies in strength from one wave cycle to the next due to variation in wave height and wave period. The rotor 2 will thus have a varying speed of rotation. This variation is reduced by the inherent design of the rotor (2), comprising both bucket-shaped vanes and blades 6, since the fluid dynamic forces from the different directions give the same rotational direction of the rotor (2) as well as not being in phase with each other.
The variation in speed of rotation for the rotor (2) can be further reduced by optimizing the mass in radial direction of the rotor 2 and mass momentum of inertia and/or the mass and mass momentum of inertia in radial direction of the shaft for the shaft-driven generator 10 or the shaft for the pump (11). A high mass momentum of inertia will slow both the acceleration and deceleration of the rotating element, and thus reduce the variation in speed of rotation.
Further, if the rotor 2 and the shaft for the shaft-driven generator 10 or the shaft for the pump is mechanically decoupled in such a way that the generator/pump shaft can rotate faster than the rotor, but not slower, then the generator or pump will notice less of the variable speed of the rotor 2, since the shaft can continue at a higher speed than the rotor 2 when the speed of the rotor 2 slows down (decelerates), but will get a new push when the rotor speeds up and catches up the shaft again. This will require a certain level for the mass momentum of inertia of the shaft; otherwise the shaft will rotate with the same speed as the rotor 2 due to the resistance from the generator when generating electric power.
Optimization of the variation in speed of rotation can be further obtained with an active or passive system for changing the mass moment of inertia in radial direction of the above mentioned components throughout the wave cycle and/or adjusted based on the slowly varying intensity of the driving forces from the moving fluid.
In order to make offshore installation and maintenance easy, it is beneficial that all the mechanical and electrical components can be mounted to the base structure 4 as a single element, or a very limited number of elements. One potential way is to assemble all the mechanical and electrical components into one unit as shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20171115 | Jul 2017 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO2018/000014 | 6/29/2018 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/009730 | 1/10/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4005947 | Norton | Feb 1977 | A |
4052134 | Rumsey | Oct 1977 | A |
4245958 | Ewers | Jan 1981 | A |
4382191 | Potter | May 1983 | A |
4718822 | Riezinstein | Jan 1988 | A |
4720239 | Owczarek | Jan 1988 | A |
4926061 | Arreola, Jr. | May 1990 | A |
5037268 | Fenlon | Aug 1991 | A |
5336933 | Ernster | Aug 1994 | A |
5997252 | Miller | Dec 1999 | A |
6582291 | Clark | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6929671 | Kim | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6966747 | Taylor | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7008171 | Whitworth | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7056082 | Taylor | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7287954 | Kinkaid | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7696635 | Boone | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7766600 | Vanderhye | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7896608 | Whitworth | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7944075 | Boone | May 2011 | B2 |
8011876 | Gradwohl | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8061993 | Sassow | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8164210 | Boone | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8322992 | Fuller | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8344538 | Desplats | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8360713 | Carosi | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8368243 | Holden | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8522435 | Sassow | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8604635 | Boone | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8678768 | Sassow | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8847425 | Jordan, Sr. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8864440 | Sauer, Jr. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8905704 | Sauer | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8961103 | Wolff | Feb 2015 | B1 |
9062655 | Scott | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9074580 | Curtis | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9494136 | Edmiston | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9896386 | Vanderhye | Feb 2018 | B2 |
10316819 | Edmiston | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10724502 | Moore | Jul 2020 | B2 |
20020068519 | Clark | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20080217924 | Boone | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080217925 | Boone | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080226451 | Tatar | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090066090 | Boone | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100278653 | Sassow | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100296944 | Caputi | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110298214 | Thompson | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120156041 | Sassow | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120187695 | Desplats | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120211992 | Boone | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130093191 | Janowski | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130121835 | Polaski | May 2013 | A1 |
20130149144 | Lau | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130259696 | Krivcov | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130264829 | Jordan, Sr. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130343890 | Sassow | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20150022005 | Jordan, Sr. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20180094618 | Edmiston | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20190242363 | Franck | Aug 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
39 28 538 | Mar 1991 | DE |
840543 | Jul 1960 | GB |
2 386 161 | Sep 2003 | GB |
2498973 | Aug 2013 | GB |
2004-0055534 | Jun 2004 | KR |
2013-0027183 | Mar 2013 | KR |
2013-0085769 | Jul 2013 | KR |
2006063833 | Jun 2006 | WO |
2006119648 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2014057326 | Apr 2014 | WO |
2014175613 | Oct 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Searching Authority, International Search Report in International Application No. PCT/NO2018/000014, dated Oct. 24, 2018. |
International Searching Authority, Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/NO2018/000014, dated Oct. 24, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200208602 A1 | Jul 2020 | US |