This invention relates to methods, circuits and systems for harvesting energy from an electromechanical device, in embodiments a piezoelectric device.
Vibration-based energy harvesters are used to extract energy from mechanical vibrations in order to power local devices or in order to store that energy for later use. Piezoelectric materials are widely used in vibration-based energy harvesters, which are also called piezoelectric vibration-based energy harvesters. Between the harvesters and the energy storage, a power-conditioning interface circuit is employed to transfer the energy generated by the harvesters into the energy storage. In order to improve the overall energy efficiency of the vibration-based energy harvesting system, power-conditioning interface circuit design is very important.
General background prior art can be found in: US2010/0079034; US2014/0021828; US2011/0227543; EP2395625A; EP2469693A; US2007/0029883; U.S. Pat. No. 6,087,863; and WO2010/146090.
While a piezoelectric vibration-based energy harvester vibrates, it can be approximately modelled as a current source, IP, in parallel with an internal capacitor, CP, which is formed by the electrode pair(s) of the harvester.
Full-bridge rectifiers are widely used to rectify the AC signal from the harvester and store the energy in a reservoir capacitor, as shown in
The inventors have, however, recognized that there are some significant hidden drawbacks of the SSHI interface circuit. One drawback arises because the switches have a finite, if low, on-resistance. This makes the circuit inefficient with lower inductance vales, and a large inductor is preferable to reduce the charging loss in the RLC loop and achieve efficient inversion of the polarization of the voltage on the harvester. This is particularly the case parasitic resistance is taken into account. However a large inductor is physically large, relatively costly, and unsuited to integration with miniaturized systems. In addition in a real-world implementation the pulse width for the switching needs to be precisely tuned to half of the pseudo-period of the RLC oscillation network. This adds complexity and instability of the energy harvesting system.
There is therefore a need for improved approaches which address the above deficiencies, and which in particular facilitate fabrication of a low-volume circuit or integrated circuit as well as providing efficient operation.
According to the present invention there is therefore provided a method of energy harvesting from an electromechanical device which provides energy in the form of charge separation, the method comprising: providing alternating current (AC) electrical power from said electromechanical device to an energy storage device via a rectifier to convert positive and negative components of said AC power to power having a single polarity for storage on said storage device: the method further comprising: identifying when a current flow from said electromechanical device is substantially zero and, responsive to said identifying: connecting and disconnecting a first charge storage capacitor in parallel with said electromechanical device with a first sense, such that charge on said electromechanical device is shared with said first charge storage capacitor, to collect charge from said electromechanical device on said first charge storage capacitor; and then connecting and disconnecting said first charge storage capacitor in parallel with said electromechanical device in a second, opposite sense to said first sense, such that said collected charge on said first charge storage capacitor is shared with opposite polarity with said electromechanical device, to replace opposite polarity charge from said first charge storage capacitor onto said electromechanical device.
In broad terms, embodiments of the method use one or more charge storage capacitors to store charge from the electromechanical device and replace it back on to the device at a zero crossing of the current supplied by the electromechanical device. This reduces a time for which power transfer is effectively lost as a consequence of the conduction threshold voltage of one or more diodes of the rectifier. The rectifier is typically a full-bridge rectifier between the electromechanical device and an ultimate storage device such as a reservoir capacitor or battery.
Furthermore, because the circuit employs capacitors rather than inductors it is easier to fabricate and more compact. In principle an energy harvesting circuit implementing the method may be fabricated on a single CMOS integrated circuit, optionally in combination with a MEMS (Micro Electrical Mechanical System) energy harvester. The electromechanical device has an internal capacitance, and it is charge on this internal capacitance which is shared with the charge storage capacitor. Typically the electromechanical device comprises a piezoelectric material and in some preferred embodiments is a MEMS device.
In preferred implementations of the method the electromechanical device is shorted (briefly) between collecting charge from the device and replacing charge onto the device. However this is not essential, particularly where multiple charge storage capacitors are employed.
In principle various circuit configurations may be employed for connecting and disconnecting the charge storage capacitor but in preferred embodiments controllable switches are employed, for example MOS (CMOS) switches. As the skilled person will appreciate, various switch configurations may be employed—for example to connect each end of the charge storage capacitor to the energy harvester with a reversible polarity four ON/OFF switches or two changeover switches may be employed. The charge sharing is virtually instantaneous apart from stray inductance, and internal resistance of the switches, and it is therefore preferable to employ low resistance switches for fast operation. In preferred embodiments the switches are controlled by one or more pulse generators which generate one or more sequences of pulses, in particular to control the switches in synchronism with detected zero crossings of the AC current from the energy harvester. As the skilled person will be aware such a zero crossing may be detected in many ways including by voltage sensing (to detect when the voltage from the energy harvester is approximately the same as the voltage drop across the diodes/rectifier), and by current sensing (using a current sense resistor connected in series with the power to or from the energy harvester).
The electromechanical device may be modelled as including a capacitor, and when charge is shared between this capacitor and the charge storage capacitor the voltage on these two capacitors substantially equalizes. One might imagine that after charge sharing the voltages on these capacitors would be half that immediately before a zero-crossing moment. In this case when charge is shared again to replace charge onto the energy harvester the voltage boost provided to the energy harvester would be a quarter of this initial voltage. However the effect of accumulating residual charge on the charge storage capacitor, as described later, results in the shared voltage being two thirds of that immediately before a zero crossing, so that a boost of one third this voltage is applied when the charge is replaced. (The mathematics behind this is set out later).
Preferably but not essentially the value of the charge storage capacitor should be of a similar magnitude to the internal capacitance of the energy harvester, more preferably approximately equal to this internal capacitance. Where multiple charge storage capacitors are employed (see below) this preferably applies to each of them.
The voltage boost applied to the internal capacitance of the energy harvester can be increased by employing multiple charge storage capacitors. In broad terms, charge is shared with a first of these and then residual charge on the internal capacitance of the energy harvester is shared with a second of these, and so forth, each charge sharing capturing a further fraction of the residual charge. In principle employing a large number of charge storage capacitors should be able to capture substantially all the charge from the energy harvester, but in practice there are diminishing returns and close to optimum performance can be achieved with a relatively low number of charge storage capacitors. Thus in embodiments there are more than two, three or four charge storage capacitors but less than for example 12, 16, 24 or 32 charge storage capacitors—for example there may be four to eight charge storage capacitors.
When multiple charge storage capacitors are employed they are preferably connected sequentially to the energy harvester to capture charge from the energy harvester (where the connecting involves connecting and then disconnecting a capacitor to capture shared charge). They are then reconnected in the reverse order, preferably after shorting out the energy harvester to zero residual charge on its internal capacitance. It will be appreciated, however, that shorting the energy harvester is not essential, particularly where almost all of the charge is removed from the energy harvester.
In a related aspect the invention provides a circuit for energy harvesting from an electromechanical device which provides energy in the form of charge separation, the circuit comprising: an input to receive alternating current (AC) electrical power from said electromechanical device; a rectifier to convert positive and negative components of said AC power to power having a single polarity for storage on an energy storage device; a zero-crossing circuit to identify when a current flow from said electromechanical device is substantially zero; a first charge storage capacitor; a first plurality of switches configured to connect and disconnect said first charge storage capacitor in parallel with said electromechanical device in a first sense and in a second opposite sense; at least one shorting switch to short said electromechanical device to reduce or zero a charge on said electromechanical device; and a controller, coupled to said zero-crossing circuit to control said first plurality of switches and said at least one shortening switch to: connect and disconnect said first charge storage capacitor in parallel with said electromechanical device in said first sense to collect charge from said electromechanical device; then short said electromechanical device reduce or zero a charge on said electromechanical device; and then connect and disconnect said first charge storage capacitor in parallel with said electromechanical device in said opposite sense to return said collected charge to said electromechanical device with an opposite polarity.
The invention further provides an energy harvesting circuit to harvest energy from a piezoelectric device, the circuit comprising: an input comprising first and second connections to receive ac power from said piezoelectric device; and a rectification stage, coupled to said input; the circuit further comprising: a first controllable multi-state switching system; and a first charge storage capacitor coupled to said input connections by said first controllable multi-state switching system; wherein said controllable multi-state switching system comprises two or more controllable switches configured such that when said switching system is in a storage state first and second plates of said first charge storage capacitor are respectively coupled to said first and second input connections; such that when said switching system is in a recovery state first and second plates of said first charge storage capacitor are respectively coupled to said second and first input connections; and such that when said switching system is in a quiescent state at least one of said plates of said first charge storage capacitor is decoupled from said input connections; and a clock generator, synchronised to said ac power from said piezoelectric device, to control said switching system to switch from said quiescent state and transition between said storage and recovery states at a zero crossing of an AC current from said piezoelectric device.
Preferably the switching system has a transitional state in which the input connections are connected together (shorted) and includes a switch for this purpose. The clock generator may then control the switching system into this transitional state between the storage and recovery states.
Embodiments may further comprise a second charge storage capacitor coupled to the input connections by a second controllable multi-state switching system. The clock generator may then control the first and second switching systems to successively switch said first and then the second switching system between its quiescent state and a respective storage state and then back to the quiescent state; and then to successively switch the second then the first switching system between its quiescent state and a respective recovery state and then back to the quiescent state. Again preferably the clock generator is configured to control the switching system into the transitional state between the sequence of storage state switchings and the sequence of recovery state switchings.
As the skilled person will appreciate the above described methods and circuits may be implemented in discrete components or partially or wholly in an integrated circuit.
These and other aspects of the invention will now be further described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying figures in which:
Broadly speaking we will describe efficient power-conditioning interface circuits for vibration-based energy harvesters, which significantly improve energy efficiency by synchronously inverting the voltage of the energy harvester using switched capacitors. Thus we describe our approach as Harvesting on Synchronised Switched Capacitors (HSSC).
In embodiments we synchronously flip the voltage across the piezoelectic transducer (PT) using one or multiple switched capacitors instead of an inductor. Our approach does not require any inductor and thus significantly reduces the required system volume. This feature is especially useful for miniaturized energy harvesting systems, such as implantable devices and miniaturized wireless sensor nodes. The circuits we describe can also achieve high voltage flip efficiency, and improved higher energy extraction efficiency
Thus embodiments of the techniques we describe perform charge inversion to invert the voltage Vpiezo from ±(VS+2VD) towards ∓(VS+2VD) using one or more switched capacitor(s) instead of an inductor, and in this way the volume and cost of the system can be significantly decreased.
When using one switched capacitor, Vpiezo can be set to ∓⅓(VS+2VD) from ±(VS+2VD). A circuit with two, three or more switched capacitors may also be used: The larger the number of switched capacitors used, the greater the charge which can be inverted to thus move Vpiezo closer to ∓(VS+2VD) after inversion.
Referring to
In
When pulse Øhd 1p is active capacitor C1 is connected to the piezoelectric energy harvester in a first, say positive, sense and the charge stored in the internal capacitor CP (Cpiezo) of the harvester is distributed between the two capacitors C1 and CP, in embodiments substantially equally (where C1≈CP). After this, when pulse Ø0 is active the remaining charge in internal capacitor CP is cleared by shorting the capacitor. When pulse Ø1p is active capacitor C1 is connected to CP in a first, negative, sense. Due to charge conservation the voltage Vpiezo goes to a negative value and the energy harvester charge is partially inverted.
Referring to
When using k switched capacitors, there are in total 2k+1 pulse signals to be generated, denoted Ø1p, Ø2p, . . . , Økp, Ø0, Økn, . . . , Ø2n, Ø1n; these are generated sequentially in this order. At the time when Vpiezo inverts the k capacitors are in turn positively connected to the internal capacitor of the harvester CP, that is sequentially in the order of Ø1p, Ø2p . . . , Økp. In this way significantly more charge is stored than in the arrangement of
IP=I0 sin 2πft, I0=400 μA, f=100 Hz, CP=150 nF, CS=0.1 F, VD=0.3 V, VS=2V
In
In the φ2 phase, CP is shorted by switch φ2 (switch 206) and the remaining charge in it is cleared, hence Vpiezo goes to 0 V.
In the φ3 phase switches φ3 (switches 204a,b) are turned ON, and CT and CP are connected in a polarization opposite to that in phase φ1. At this time some charge on CT flows onto CP until they have the same voltage values across them and Vpiezo goes to a negative value as a result. In the simulation, Vpiezo equals to 2.4 V before the zero-crossing moment and it goes to −0.8 V (approximately ⅓ of its initial value) after the inversion process.
In principle the capacitance of each switched capacitor (C1, C2 . . . . Ck) should preferably be substantially equal to CP in order to achieve optimum charge inversion performance. In practice the value of CP may vary between devices and an approximate match to the particular device used is sufficient.
Preferably pulses Ø1p, Ø2p . . . , Økp, Ø0, Økn, . . . , Ø2n and Ø1n are non-overlapping for efficiency.
The skilled person will appreciate that this may be generalized to the case of N charge storage capacitors, where there are preferably 2N+1 states (for example 17 states where N=8). The first N states sequentially couple the N capacitors to the input connections of the circuit (the first and second plates of each capacitor are respectively coupled to first and second input connections of the circuit). In the (optional but preferable) neutral state, in order, the middle state in the 2N+1 states, all the storage capacitors are decoupled from the both of the input connections and the two input connections are connected to clear the remaining charge in the piezoelectric device. The final N states sequentially couple the N storage capacitors to the input connections in a reversed order as compared with the first N states (the first and second plates of each capacitor are respectively coupled to the second and first input connections). The first N states may be termed charge storage states and the final N states charge recovery states.
Referring now to
Various zero-crossing detect methods/circuits may be employed, for example detecting the maximum and minimum values of Vpiezo, which are also the zero-crossings of Ip. In one embodiment the zero-crossing detect circuit 652 operates as follows: when IP is close to zero, the diodes of the full-bridge rectifier are just about to turn OFF. At this instant, one of VP and VN is close to −VD and the other one is close to VS+VD. Thus one method to detect the zero-crossing moment of IP is to compare either VP or VN (depending on the sign of Vpiezo) with a reference voltage Vref, for example using two (continuous-time) comparators. The reference voltage Vref may be set slightly higher than the negative value of the voltage drop of the diodes (−VD). If the voltage drop of the diodes is very small, Vref may be directly connected to the ground. Alternatively, however, other techniques (such as a current sensing resistor) may be employed.
As described above, the power supply (denoted VDD) for the system may be an external power supply such as a battery; it may also be obtained from a voltage regulator by regulating the voltage across the reservoir capacitor CS. In this case, the system is self-powered.
In some preferred embodiments one or more voltage level shifters may be provided between the pulse sequence generator 656 and circuit 600, more particularly the switches of the circuit. This facilitates overdriving the switches, to improve the degree to which they are turned ON/OFF. For example there may be three voltage level shifters to shift the voltage levels of all the pulse signals (φ1, φ2 and φ3) to a higher ON level and a negative OFF level. If there are more than three pulses, more level shifters may be employed. The level shifters are employed to overdrive the switches to turn them fully ON or OFF. In order to generate the overdrive voltage levels (a higher voltage level and/or a negative voltage level), a DC-DC voltage boost converter and a DC-to-DC-voltage inverter may be employed. These voltage levels are generated from the power supply VDD.
Performance Analysis
It is useful to calculate how much charge is inverted, from which can be derived a condition to optimize performance.
Before a zero-crossing moment, it is assumed that Vpiezo is positive and equal to VS+2VD, denoted V0 for simplicity. CT is assumed to have no charge initially and hence VT=0 V. At the first zero-crossing moment of IP, φ1 is turned ON because Vpiezo is positive. CP and CT are connected and charge flows into CT until the voltages across the two capacitors are equal. As the total charge remains unchanged the voltage across CP and CT at the end of the first phase is:
In the second phase pulse φ2 is generated and the remaining charge on CP is cleared. Hence, the voltage across CP and CT at the end of the second phase is:
In phase φ3, CT is connected with CP again, but in an opposite direction to charge CP to a negative voltage. As the total charge in the two capacitors is the remaining charge on CT the voltages Vpiezo and VT at the end of this phase are:
It can be seen that Vpiezo is negative at the end of the zero-crossing moment. By setting the derivative of the above expression to 0, it can be found that Vpiezo3 attains its minimum value when CT=CP. Therefore the minimum value of Vpiezo at the end of the first charge inversion is:
The resulting voltage above for Vpiezo3 is obtained after the first charge inversion and the initial voltage across CT is assumed at 0 V at the beginning. However before the second zero-crossing moment, VT is no longer 0 V, but ¼V0. Vpiezo now equals −V0 and will be inverted from negative to positive. Assuming CT=CP is chosen for the calculations below, Vpiezo and VT values after each phase of φ1, φ2, and φ3 at the second charge inversion stage are:
As 5/16>¼ more charge is inverted during the second zero-crossing than the first. After n charge inversion stages the resulting magnitude |Vpiezo| at the end of the nth inversion stage is:
As n tends to infinity, Vpiezo|n→∞=⅓V0, which implies that theoretically one third of charge can be inverted if CT=CP.
One can also calculate the power that can be harvested and stored in the storage capacitor CS at the output of the circuit. Assuming that the piezoelectric harvester is excited with a sinusoidal signal, the corresponding current source can be written as IP=I0 sin ωt, where ω=2πf0 and f0 is the excitation frequency. The total charge that can be generated by the harvester in a half cycle T/2 can be calculated as:
As shown above, a third of the charge can be inverted at each zero-crossing, which occurs each half cycle. After the zero-crossing the piezoelectric harvester still needs to charge its internal capacitor CP to from ±(VS+2VD) to ±(VS+2VD) and this amount of charge is wasted. Therefore, the useful charge that flows into CS in a half cycle is:
The average harvested power can then be expressed as:
With a given excitation level, where I0 is a constant, the power attains a maximum value when
Assuming the voltage drop of the diodes is negligible such that VD≈0 the maximum power can be expressed as:
The design was experimentally evaluated using a commercially available piezoelectric harvester of dimension 47 mm×36 mm (Mide Technology Corporation V20 W). A shaker (LDS V406 M4-CE) was excited at the natural frequency of the piezoelectric harvester, 82 Hz, driven by a sine wave from a function generator (Agilent Technologies 33250A) amplified by a power amplifier (LDS PA100E Power Amplifier). The test circuit was powered by an external power supply at 1.8 V.
Compared to a full-bridge rectifier, embodiments of the interface circuit we describe can significantly improve the energy efficiency by inverting Vpiezo for each half cycle of input excitation. Unlike a conventional SSHI power-conditioning interface circuit, embodiments of the invention do not employ an inductor to perform the charge inversion, which can significantly reduce the overall volume and cost of a vibration-based energy harvesting system. Also unlike the SSHI interface circuit, the pulse width of the pulses used in the switches for switched capacitors does not need to be precisely tuned: In preferred embodiments the pulse width is preferably merely longer than the time constant of the RC loop, to allow the majority of the charge to be shared between CP and one of the temporary switched capacitors. Table 1 below shows a comparison between the performance of a full-bridge rectifier circuit, a SSHI interface circuit, and embodiments of the interface circuit we describe.
A further example implementation will now be described with reference to
Assuming there are k switched capacitors employed in the HSSC circuit, after the pulse generation block 1004 reads a rising edge in SYN, 2k+1 sequential pulses are generated. In the following pulse sequencing block, these 2k+1 signals are sequenced according to the level of the signal PN. Then, these sequenced 2k+1 signals are used to drive analog switches in the switch control block 1008 to perform voltage flipping with the k off-chip capacitors. In order to achieve the optimal voltage flip efficiency, the values of the k off-chip capacitors are chosen as C1=C2= . . . Ck=CP. In embodiments a voltage regulator, preferably with over-voltage protection, is employed to make the system self-powered. The internal transistor-level circuit diagrams and operations for each block are presented and explained below.
Zero-Crossing Detection
Pulse Generation
Pulse Sequencing
After the up to 17 sequential pulses are generated, they are sequenced before driving the switches to flip VPT.
Switch Control and Voltage Regulation Blocks
Measurement Results
The HSSC interface circuit 1000 was designed and fabricated in a 0.35 m HV CMOS process. The system was experimentally evaluated using a commercially available piezoelectric transducer (PT) of dimension 58 mm×16 mm (Mide Technology Corporation V21BL). This PT has an measured internal capacitance of CP=45 nF and the 8 off-chip switched capacitors were chosen with the equal capacitances of 45 nF to achieve the optimal voltage flip efficiency. During the measurement, a shaker (LDS V406 M4-CE) was excited at the natural frequency of the PT at 92 Hz and driven by a sine wave from a function generator (Agilent Technologies 33250A 80 MHz waveform generator) amplified by a power amplifier (LDS PA100E Power Amplifier). A super capacitor was employed as the energy storage capacitor (AVX BestCap BZ05CA103ZSB) with a measured capacitance CS≈5.2 mF. As the circuit is self-sustained with an on-chip voltage regulator, the voltage supply from the voltage regulator is only available when voltage across the storage capacitor satisfies VS≥1.5V. While VS<1.5V, the interface circuit simply works as a full-bridge rectifier (FBR) as all the 33 switches are OFF until VS is charged to 1.5V. Hence, an external power supply at 1.5V was used while measuring the harvested power for VS<1.5V.
Table 2, below, lists the power consumption due to different blocks of the HSSC interface circuit 1000.
32%
The values shown in the table are obtained from simulations with assumptions that 8 switched capacitors are employed (with 80% voltage flip efficiency) and the PT resonant frequency is 92 Hz. Employing fewer switched capacitors can reduce the power loss due to the “pulse generation” and “switch control” blocks significantly. This is because fewer pulse signals are generated and fewer switches in the switch control block are driven in this case. The PT resonant frequency also affects the power consumption of these two blocks because a series of pulse signals is generated for every half period of the excitation frequency. Hence a higher frequency results in more pulse signals and more power consumed in generating pulses and driving switches.
where ΔVS is a small voltage increase in VS and T is the time elapsed. In
We have thus described an inductor-less interface circuit for piezoelectric vibration-based energy harvesters employing switched capacitors to synchronously flip the residual charge across the piezoelectric transducer (PT) which significantly improve key circuit metrics. Compared to other interface circuits, such as SSHI (synchronized switch harvesting on inductor), SECE (synchronous electrical charge extraction) embodiments of the interface circuit we describe completely removes the requirement for an inductor to flip the voltage across the PT.
From theoretical calculations, the voltage flip efficiency is ⅓ when only one switched capacitor is employed and this efficiency approaches 80% with 8 switched capacitors. In order to achieve these optimal theoretical voltage flip efficiencies, the capacitances of the switched capacitors should preferably be substantially equal to the internal capacitance of the PT. For an SSHI interface circuit to achieve an equal voltage flip efficiency, a large inductor would be required, which is very impractical in miniaturized systems for real-world implementations. The measured results show that our HSSC interface circuit improves the performance by 9.7× compared to a full-bridge rectifier. The performance boost is higher than reported inductor-based interface circuits with smaller system volume requirements due to the proposed capacitor-based design and hence a much higher energy efficiency per unit volume can be obtained.
In principle full on-chip integration of the circuit and switched capacitors could be employed, for example for piezoelectric MEMS energy harvesters. This in turn could provide a new-class of fully integrated self-powered CMOS-MEMS sensor nodes.
No doubt many other effective alternatives will occur to the skilled person. It will be understood that the invention is not limited to the described embodiments and encompasses modifications apparent to those skilled in the art lying within the spirit and scope of the claims appended hereto.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1603475.3 | Feb 2016 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2017/050534 | 2/28/2017 | WO | 00 |