This application claims priority of Germany Patent Application No. DE 101 21 962.8, filed May 5, 2001.
The subject of the invention is an energy management system for a motor vehicle electrical system including at least one generator, at least one storage battery and a large number of loads.
Future motor vehicles will likely have a different system structure than is common today. Production of electric power will likely be carried out by one or more generators which, in addition to being driven by an internal combustion engine, will also receive a supply of mechanical energy resulting from braking operations. This method, already known as braking energy recovery, makes it necessary to a still greater extent than in the standard case today of the generation of electrical energy to have generators and electrical storage media which are designed for considerably higher proportion of peak currents which are needed or provided.
Since, however, weight limits relating to the presence of a generator and a battery have to be complied with in each vehicle in order to avoid forfeiting the advantage of more efficient power generation and the associated lower fuel consumption because of an increase in vehicle mass, it is necessary to use particularly efficient components.
Within the context of the technical implementation of energy management systems for motor vehicle systems, an extremely wide range of methods for monitoring, in particular, the state of charge of the storage batteries are known.
For example, in a method of measuring the state of charge, DE-C 2242510 discloses the practice of weighting the charging current with a factor that depends on the temperature and on the state of charge of the battery itself.
DE-A 4007883 discloses a method in which the starting capacity of an accumulator is determined by measuring accumulator voltage and battery temperature and comparing with a family of curves of the state of charge which apply to the battery type to be tested.
DE-A 19543874 discloses a calculation method for the discharge characteristics and residual capacity measurement of a battery, in which likewise, current, voltage and temperature are measured, the discharge characteristics being approximated by means of a mathematical function with a curved surface.
DE-C 3901680 describes a method of monitoring the cold-start capability of a starter battery in which the starter battery is loaded from time to time with a resistance, the voltage which drops across the resistance is measured and, in a comparison with empirical values, is used to determine whether the cold-start capability of the battery is still adequate. In this case, the starting operation is used to load the starter battery.
Finally, DE-A 4339568 discloses a method of determining the state of charge of a motor vehicle starter battery in which battery current and quiescent voltage are measured and used to determine the state of charge, the battery temperature also being taken into account. In this case, the charging currents measured during different time periods are compared with one another and used to determine a residual capacity.
However, the aforementioned battery monitoring methods, whose information is at the same time a basic precondition for the specific management of the electrical energy in the vehicle electrical system, still do not contain approaches to the implementation of this control intervention required for more efficient fuel utilization.
It would, therefore, be advantageous to provide defining an energy management system and, with the aid of this system to influence the generation, consumption and storage of electrical energy in such a way that overall vehicle efficiency is improved. In addition to technical limitations, it is necessary to make “energy” decisions such that the safety of motor vehicle passengers is not restricted or compromised and vehicle comfort does not appreciably decrease.
This invention relates to an energy management system for an electrical system of a motor vehicle subjected to a large number of loads including at least one generator, at least one storage battery, a controller of energy distribution in the system which bases such control at least on efficiency of individual components of the motor vehicle involved in power generation, energy storage and power consumption.
The energy management system according to aspects of the invention receives information from 1) the drive system of a motor vehicle comprising an engine, a transmission and a braking system, 2) a generator, 3) a large number of electric loads, and 4) a storage battery or system of storage batteries, and controls the energy distribution in the system via this information. For example, the current engine rotational speed or the braking effort instantaneously occurring, together with the power consumption of the loads and the state variables which describe the battery, such as its charge content or its temperature, determines the power output from the generator, which is controlled by means of its excitation current, for example. The proportion of energy produced by the generator or by a system of a plurality of generators under given conditions is supplied to the battery system via an energy distributor is likewise determined by the energy management system.
The distribution of energy in the system is carried out while taking into account the efficiency of individual components involved in power generation, energy storage or power consumption. In particular, the control of energy distribution is carried out by means of a numerical comparison of the chains of efficiencies which result from the individual efficiencies of the components involved in power generation, energy storage and power consumption. In order to determine the overall efficiency of the storage unit which is associated with the system and comprises at least one energy store, the variables used are the state of charge and the temperature of the store and also the absolute magnitude of the charging and discharging currents, in order to incorporate its efficiency into the efficiency chain.
The internal combustion engine and/or the braking power over the period of the vehicle deceleration are available as mechanical energy source for generating electric power. As a further energy generator, a fuel cell or a secondary unit in the form of a further heat engine, for example, may be present in the system. The electric stores may be an extremely wide range of batteries based on electrochemistry and/or capacitor banks in, for example, redundant parallel circuits.
In the case of the vehicle battery normally used as an energy store, charging and discharging efficiency rise with increasing temperatures, current withdrawal is particularly efficient when the battery is fully charged, as opposed to the acceptance of charge, which functions particularly well in the case of a partly discharged battery. In addition, efficiency of the battery depends quite critically on the current intensity, both during discharging and charging. It may, therefore, be advantageous to use a two-component, controlled storage system, such as a combination of lead/acid battery and capacitor.
With regard to their efficiency and their influence on the generation and storage of the power, the typical loads of a vehicle electrical system can advantageously be controlled by means of a clocked energy supply.
According to the invention, the method to be applied for optimized energy management in a vehicle electrical system takes into account efficiency chains in the generation of electrical power.
First, the two main efficiency chains of power generation regarding improved efficiency and the decision to be derived from the latter as to which of the two possibilities is currently to be used are particularly important. The first chain is formed from the product of the current individual efficiencies of the internal combustion engine and the generator. It is known that both units have poor efficiencies at very low rotational speeds.
The second chain is formed from the generator efficiency for the braking energy recovery, multiplied by the overall efficiency (charging+discharging) of the electrical storage system.
The power provided in this way at a specific generator rotational speed nG and temperature TG with the efficiency ηG; (nG, TG can be supplied to the loads at up to 100%, for example, or 100% can be loaded into the storage system with the efficiency ηSL (Q, Ts, ISL)). Q signifies the current state of charge, Ts the temperature of the store and ISL the magnitude of the charge to be loaded in.
In actual fact, a mixed form is established in the system which supplies a part α of the generator current to the loads and offers the remainder 1−α to the storage system.
In the case of a very low storage temperature, part of the electrical energy supplied by the generator can be used to bring the storage battery to a better efficiency level. In this case, the current storage efficiency is a function ηSL (Q, Ts, I*SL) with the storage and heating current I*SL.
The optimization program of the energy management system determines the proportion α, so that the generator current is divided up with the best possible efficiency. At the same time, a decision is made as to whether it is more expedient, in energetic terms, to draw the current currently needed in the electrical system from the store and not to excite the generator winding and/or to uncouple the generator mechanically from the engine or from the remaining drive train without the engine.
This decision is based on the alternative efficiency chains
The discharging efficiency of the store ηSE is also a function of the average generator efficiency ηG, since the charge in the energy store or storage battery must first of all be provided by the generator system. However, the magnitude of the generator efficiency ηG also further includes whether and in what ratio the mechanical work was supplied either by the engine or by the braking. If, therefore, it is determined that η2>η1, then the energy management decides in favor of the power supply from the battery, specifically until this state is no longer given.
In the case of braking force recovery, in addition to moderate current during usual and quite frequent retardations, peak currents may also arise during very intensive braking operations. The energy management takes into account whether the braking energy can be stored and to what proportion, depending on the charging characteristics of the storage system.
If, for example, two stores are available, one being particularly suitable for the short-term acceptance of a very high braking output, then its absorption capacity will be determined by the energy management and, depending on the power absorption, transport with a low transmission power into the other storage medium will be initiated, or else will be fed immediately to the loads again. In this case, a generator operating as a drive motor to assist the internal combustion engine also counts as a load.
During time periods in which there is a general sparsity of energy in the electrical system, the energy management system can control the power demand of the loads in accordance with a stored priority list.
By means of the energy management system, in particular, a working point which is an optimum for the state of charge and for the temperature of the battery, will be complied with. This point in turn depends on the statistical distribution of the vehicle operating states and must be learned from the immediate past and interpolated into the future. As far as the immediate future of the driving system affecting the vehicle is concerned, the energy management system can receive this information by satellite (warning of a traffic jam, downward slopes and the like).
As a result of the extremely complex nature of electrochemical accumulators and the combination of physical and electrochemical storage systems, a main task of the energy management is optimal control of the state of charge and the temperature of these components.
In
While a reduction in the state of charge interval SOC in the range of small charging/discharging currents has no significant effect on the storage efficiency, even moderate currents (Icharge=26 A; Idischarge=176 A) have the effect of an average efficiency penalty of −2.5% if the state of charge range is reduced by 10%. Accordingly, the SOC parameter has a more intense effect on the inclination of the storage efficiency surface as charging/discharging currents increase.
On the other hand, a reduction in the temperature (FIG. 4 and
The change in the daily behavior of the two parameters SOC and battery temperature has a different effect over the yearly cycle of the vehicle operation. The temperature increase, which begins during the cold-starting operation, can be up to about 50° C. until the operating temperature of the engine is reached, if the store is accommodated under the engine hood. As a result, the storage efficiency changes by up to about 15%.
Given states of charge of different levels, it is possible for a change in the storage efficiency of up to about 5-about 10% to occur.
On the basis of the fuel use for the vehicle, the sliding average ηG of the generator efficiency and of the drive train is also incorporated in the overall battery efficiency ηs. It is, therefore, advantageous to describe the overall battery efficiency as accurately as possible as a function of the state of charge, temperature and charge/discharge cycle.
For example, for a storage battery with 35 Ah capacity and a cold-starting current of 315 A, the formulation according to the invention of an appropriate rule is as follows:
ηs(overall battery efficiency)=η0+η1+η2
Here, η0 takes the pure temperature influence into account as follows:
η0=74.7%+0.25·T(° C.)
However, this set of equations for determining the overall charging/discharging efficiency, for example, of a lead/acid battery, does not include the effect of aging. However, this is in principle possible using methods of permanent battery monitoring, in particular, during the starting operation. In the case of other energy stores, such as double-layer capacitors, which are extremely effective in combination with a lead/acid battery, the aging effect can be ignored, as measured over the lifetime of an automobile.
The particular advantages of taking the efficiency of the individual components of the vehicle electrical system into account in the energy management system can be seen in the fact that, by means of intelligent management of the electrical energy in the vehicle electrical system, the overall system efficiency can be increased considerably and, as a result, the fuel consumption can be reduced considerably. For this purpose, the EMS described in accordance with the invention should be informed at every operating instant about the current technical data of the units involved in power generation, power consumption and its storage and, on the basis of the numerical results of an algorithm whose basis is formed by the individual component efficiencies, a decision is made as to how the flows of energy are to be divided up optimally with the effect of the best overall efficiency. Only with vehicles which have such an EMS is the ambitious objective of significantly reducing fuel consumption to be achieved, in addition to the introduction of all the previously known measures.
In selected preferred embodiments, the invention includes one or more of the following features:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
101 21 962 | May 2001 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3906329 | Bader | Sep 1975 | A |
4153867 | Jungfer et al. | May 1979 | A |
4193025 | Frailing et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4207611 | Gordon | Jun 1980 | A |
4322685 | Frailing et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4595880 | Patil | Jun 1986 | A |
4642600 | Gummelt et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4659977 | Kissel et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4665370 | Holland | May 1987 | A |
4719427 | Morishita et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4805571 | Humphrey | Feb 1989 | A |
4816736 | Dougherty et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4876513 | Brilmyer et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4888716 | Ueno | Dec 1989 | A |
4937528 | Palanisamy | Jun 1990 | A |
4943777 | Nakamura et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4952861 | Horn | Aug 1990 | A |
5002840 | Klebenow et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5032825 | Kuznicki | Jul 1991 | A |
5055656 | Farah et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5079716 | Lenhardt et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5130699 | Reher et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5159272 | Rao et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5162164 | Dougherty et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5204610 | Pierson et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5223351 | Wruck | Jun 1993 | A |
5280231 | Kato et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5281919 | Palanisamy | Jan 1994 | A |
5316868 | Dougherty et al. | May 1994 | A |
5321627 | Reher | Jun 1994 | A |
5352968 | Reni et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5381096 | Hirzel | Jan 1995 | A |
5404129 | Novak et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5412323 | Kato et al. | May 1995 | A |
5416402 | Reher et al. | May 1995 | A |
5428560 | Leon et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5439577 | Weres et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5488283 | Dougherty et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5549984 | Dougherty | Aug 1996 | A |
5552642 | Dougherty et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563496 | McClure | Oct 1996 | A |
5572136 | Champlin | Nov 1996 | A |
5578915 | Crouch, Jr. et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5656915 | Eaves | Aug 1997 | A |
5680050 | Kawai et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5698965 | York | Dec 1997 | A |
5721688 | Bramwell | Feb 1998 | A |
5744936 | Kawakami | Apr 1998 | A |
5744963 | Arai et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5761072 | Bardsley, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773977 | Dougherty | Jun 1998 | A |
5808367 | Akagi et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808445 | Aylor et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818116 | Nakae et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5818333 | Yaffe et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5896023 | Richter | Apr 1999 | A |
5898292 | Takemoto et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5936383 | Ng et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5965954 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5977654 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990660 | Meissner | Nov 1999 | A |
6016047 | Notten et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6037749 | Parsonage | Mar 2000 | A |
6037777 | Champlin | Mar 2000 | A |
6057666 | Dougherty et al. | May 2000 | A |
6087808 | Pritchard | Jul 2000 | A |
6091325 | Zur et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6118252 | Richter | Sep 2000 | A |
6118275 | Yoon et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6144185 | Dougherty et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160382 | Yoon et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6222341 | Dougherty et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6268712 | Laig-Horstebrock et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6271642 | Dougherty et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6296593 | Gotou et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300763 | Kwok | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304059 | Chalasani et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331762 | Bertness | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6369578 | Crouch, Jr. et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6388421 | Abe | May 2002 | B2 |
6388450 | Richter et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6392389 | Kohler | May 2002 | B1 |
6392414 | Bertness | May 2002 | B2 |
6392415 | Laig-Horstebrock et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6417668 | Howard et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424157 | Gollomp et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6441585 | Bertness | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445158 | Bertness et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452361 | Dougherty et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6472875 | Meyer | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6495990 | Champlin | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6507194 | Suzuki | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6515452 | Choo | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6515456 | Mixon | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522148 | Ochiai et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6534992 | Meissner et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6556019 | Bertness | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6600237 | Meissner | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6608482 | Sakai et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6653818 | Laig-Horstebrock et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
20020008495 | Dougherty et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026252 | Wruck et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020031700 | Wruck et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030007369 | Gilbreth et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030047366 | Andrew et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030082440 | Mrotek et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030142228 | Flach et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030236656 | Dougherty | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040021468 | Dougherty et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 242 510 | Apr 1974 | DE |
22 42 510 | Apr 1974 | DE |
25 11 426 | Sep 1975 | DE |
33 34 128 | Apr 1985 | DE |
37 12 629 | Oct 1987 | DE |
38 08 559 | Sep 1989 | DE |
39 01 680 | Mar 1990 | DE |
38 82 374 | Oct 1993 | DE |
40 07 883 | Sep 1994 | DE |
44 14 134 | Nov 1994 | DE |
43 39 568 | May 1995 | DE |
689 24 169 | Mar 1996 | DE |
195 40 827 | May 1996 | DE |
195 43 874 | May 1996 | DE |
197 50 309 | May 1999 | DE |
691 31 276 | Dec 1999 | DE |
198 47 648 | Apr 2000 | DE |
694 23 918 | Aug 2000 | DE |
199 52 693 | May 2001 | DE |
199 60 761 | May 2001 | DE |
93 21 638 | Aug 2001 | DE |
100 21 161 | Oct 2001 | DE |
699 00 638 | Aug 2002 | DE |
0 516 336 | Feb 1992 | EP |
1 116 958 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1 120 641 | Aug 2001 | EP |
WO 9715839 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 99 17128 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 99 66340 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0004620 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 01 15023 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 03001224 | Jan 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020171392 A1 | Nov 2002 | US |