The present invention relates to an energy protection device for an aircraft, more specifically a transport airplane.
More precisely, said device is intended for protecting the aircraft from low energy situations (low speed, high incidence, low engine thrust) able to jeopardize the safety of the aircraft, more specifically near the ground.
Generally, such a device usually comprises:
The protection function being defined in guiding and flight control calculators for the aircraft, thus generates, in all cases where the aircraft is in a low energy situation, an automatic increase of the thrust so as to achieve the maximum engine thrust, and this whatever the initial position of the throttles of the aircraft.
From documents FR-2 890 645 and WO-2007/031634, an energy protection device is known for an airplane being provided with at least one engine arranged on each one of its wings and with at least one additional engine. Such a protection device has a broad domain of use, wherein the safety of the airplane is maintained. To this end, it comprises means for inhibiting the protection function, but inhibiting such a function only when all the engines being arranged on one single same wing of the airplane are simultaneously defective, such a situation making critical the dissymmetry created for the lateral control of the airplane, allowing the number of inhibition cases to be considerably reduced. Consequently, such a protection device has a much broader domain of use than a usual device, in particular in the case of one single engine becoming defective or in the case of two engines becoming defective, being arranged on different wings.
When the conditions for triggering a previously activated protection function are no longer met, the autothrottle remains engaged, the maximum thrust is still applied to the engines, and an appropriate message is displayed on a flight mode annunciator of the aircraft.
The protection function could, indeed, be disengaged thru disengaging the autothrottle, requiring a manual action from the pilot. More precisely, in order to disengage the autothrottle, the pilot should act on a dedicated disconnection means, or on the throttles so as to bring them in the idling position, or even on a controlling means relative to the autothrottle on a display of the FCU (<<Flight Control Unit>>) type.
Consequently, current airplanes exhibit the following restriction. In order to get out of the above mentioned protection mode, pilots have to disconnect manually the autothrottle as a result of the protection function being triggered and this even if the autothrottle was engaged before this protection function was triggered, in order to omit maintaining the blocked engine thrust at the maximum thrust of the TOGA type. The crew have afterwards to re-engage the autothrottle for continuing the flight, if the autothrottle is used for the remainder of the flight. So, the crew must sometimes carry out various successive actions so as to return back to a situation being compatible with the remainder of the flight. The crew's workload is thus significant in such a situation.
The present invention aims at solving these drawbacks. It relates to an energy protection method for an aircraft provided with at least one engine and one autothrottle allowing for automatically managing going out of a protection function.
To this end, according to the invention, said method wherein:
a) during a flight of the aircraft, automatically and repeatedly, a plurality of data of the aircraft is monitored, so as to be able to detect a triggering situation, for which conditions for triggering an energy protection are met; and
b) in the case where a triggering situation is detected, a protection function is automatically activated, involving automatically engaging said autothrottle if it is not already engaged and automatically controlling the engine(s) of the aircraft so that they provide a maximum thrust, is remarkable in that, in addition:
c) in the case where the protection function is triggered, the engagement state of the autothrottle is automatically recorded upon said triggering, and a monitoring is implemented, involving automatically and repeatedly monitoring parameters of the aircraft, so as to be able to detect a return back to a predetermined operational flight domain; and
d) in the case of a return of the aircraft back to said operational flight domain being detected, the protection function is automatically deactivated and the autothrottle is automatically brought in an engagement state depending on said recorded engagement state (upon triggering the protection).
Thus, thanks to the invention, in the case of a return of the aircraft back to a particular operational flight domain being detected, to be set forth hereinunder, the protection function is automatically deactivated and the state of the autothrottle is automatically managed. No action is thus required from a pilot in such a phase of going out of the energy protection mode, allowing, more specifically, overcoming the above mentioned drawbacks.
Moreover, as set forth hereinunder, the autothrottle is (automatically) brought in a state depending on the previously recorded engagement state upon triggering the protection function, such a new state being adapted to the flight phase able to be implemented at the current time, as set forth hereinunder.
Advantageously, at step c), a return of the aircraft back to said operational flight domain is detected, when the two following conditions are simultaneously met:
Furthermore, in a first embodiment, at step d):
d1a) if the memorized engagement state indicates that the autothrottle was engaged upon triggering the protection function, said autothrottle is maintained engaged. In this case, the thrust applied to the engines of the aircraft is thus fully managed by the autothrottle; and
d1b) if the memorized engagement state indicates that the autothrottle was disengaged upon said triggering, said autothrottle is automatically disengaged, out of a particular situation of going around of the aircraft. In such a case, the thrust applied to the engines (upon going out of the energy protection function) corresponds to the manual thrust controlled by a pilot via the throttle.
Furthermore, advantageously, if the aircraft is in a going around situation in the case of a return back to the operation flight domain being detected, and if it is not in a smooth configuration, the autothrottle is maintained engaged at step dib), enabling to anticipate a homogeneous behaviour with the situation existing out of protection.
In addition, in a second embodiment, at step d)
d2a) if the memorized engagement state indicates that the autothrottle was engaged upon triggering the protection function, said autothrottle is maintained engaged; and
d2b) with the exception of two above described particular situations, if the memorized engagement state indicates that the autothrottle was disengaged upon said triggering, said autothrottle is maintained engaged, but the target speed of said autothrottle is synchronized with a maneuver speed. Such synchronization allows for a return back to a target speed adapted for the flight point.
Advantageously, said maneuver speed depends on the aerodynamic configuration of the aircraft upon the detection of a return of the aircraft back to the operational flight domain.
Moreover, advantageously, at step d2b), if the aircraft is in one of the two following particular situations: a going around situation in a hypersustained configuration and a selected approach situation, the speed of the autothrottle is not synchronized, as it is already adapted for the corresponding situation. Indeed:
The present invention further relates to an energy protection device for an aircraft, in particular a transport airplane, being provided with at least one engine and one autothrottle.
According to this invention, said device being embedded and comprising:
Such a device according to this invention thus allows to automatically go out of a preliminarily activated energy protection function, and to avoid maintaining the blocked engine thrust at the maximum thrust of the TOGA type.
The present invention further relates to an aircraft, in particular a transport airplane, comprising a device such as mentioned hereinabove.
The FIGS. of the appended drawing will better explain how this invention can be implemented. In these FIGS., like reference numerals relate to like components.
The device 1 according to this invention and schematically shown on
This device 1 comprises to this end means, to be set forth hereinunder, allowing to protect the aircraft from low energy situations (low speed, high incidence, low engine thrust) able to jeopardize the safety, more specifically near the ground.
To this end, said device 1 is of the usual type comprising:
Obviously, if the protection function is not activated, the different engines M of the aircraft are usually controlled, following usual orders generated, more specifically, by the pilot of the aircraft using the (not shown) throttle.
Said device 1 could further comprise a display means 9 being connected via a link 10 to a unit 11 (to be set forth hereinunder) and being able to display a message warning a pilot of the aircraft about any activation of the protection function, for instance, displaying an appropriate message on a screen, such as a primary flight screen of the PFD (<<Primary Flight Display>>) type for instance.
In a particular embodiment, said monitoring means 3 comprise a plurality of (not shown) sensors for respectively measuring at least some of the following parameters: the incidence of the aircraft, the angle of pitch of the aircraft, the pitching rate, the speed of the aircraft, as well as its deceleration rate, the Mach number of the aircraft, the position of slats and flaps of the aircraft, the radio-altitude height of the aircraft. The means 3 monitor such parameters for being able to detect low energy situation of the aircraft.
Preferably, said monitoring means 3 detect a triggering situation for activating said protection function, if the energy of the aircraft is excessively low, in one of the two following cases:
Thus, upon the activation of the protection function, the different following actions are implemented:
According to this invention, said device 1 further comprises:
Thus, in the case of a detection of a return of the aircraft back to a particular operational flight domain, to be set forth hereinunder, the device 1 according to this invention automatically deactivates the protection function and automatically manages the state of the autothrottle 2. No action is thus required from the pilot in such a phase of going out of the energy protection mode.
Moreover, as set forth hereinunder, the autothrottle 2 is brought (automatically) in a state depending on the prior previously recorded engagement state, such a state being adapted for the flight phase able to be implemented at the current moment, as set forth hereinunder.
In a particular embodiment, said means 4, 12, and 15 could, more specifically, be part of a control unit 11.
Furthermore, the means 14 detect a return of the aircraft back to said operational flight domain, when the two following condition are simultaneously met:
In a particular embodiment, shown on
The above mentioned threshold value is defined so that the energy protection is not triggered again immediately after going out of the protection, so as to avoid too frequent switches.
Hereinafter, two embodiments are provided according to this invention, allowing to go out automatically of the protection function and to omit maintaining the blocked engine thrust at the maximum thrust TOGA.
In a first embodiment:
On the other hand, if the aircraft is in a particular <<Go-Around>> situation, in the case of a return back to the operational flight domain being detected, the autothrottle 2 is maintained engaged. This is therefore an exception to the principle involving memorizing the engagement state of the autothrottle 2 in a go around case, in the case where the aircraft is not in a smooth aerodynamic configuration (slats/flaps). In a go around case in a hypersustained aerodynamic configuration, after the protection function has been activated, the autothrottle 2 must remain engaged after the return back to the operational flight domain, even if it was initially disengaged. Indeed, generally (except for a protection case), the autothrottle 2 is engaged when the crew trigger the go around.
The exception involving maintaining the autothrottle 2 engaged even if it was not engaged before the protection function is triggered allows to recover a homogeneous behaviour with the out of protection function situation of the ALPHA FLOOR type.
Moreover, in a second embodiment:
Advantageously, said maneuver speed depends on the aerodynamic configuration of the aircraft upon the detection of a return of the aircraft back to the operational flight domain.
By way of illustration, the maneuver speed is as set forth hereinunder, in the case of an airplane comprising the following usual aerodynamic configurations of its slats and flaps (that is, the position of the latter): a so-called <<smooth>> configuration, such a configuration being referred to as 1, a so-called configuration 2, a so-called configuration 3, and a so-called <<Full>> configuration.
In such a case, the maneuver speed preferably corresponds:
An exception is applied (no re-synchronization of the target speed, even if the autothrottle 2 was disengaged before the protection function) in the case of a go around in a hypersustained aerodynamic configuration or if an approach FMS phase has been selected. In these two cases, the target speed is relevant, it is therefore not required to resynchronize it.
Indeed:
Consequently, in this second embodiment, the autothrottle 2 is still maintained engaged after the protection function has been triggered, when the aircraft returns back to the operational flight domain, except in the two previous situations. However, if the autothrottle 2 was initially disengaged before the protection function was triggered, the target speed is resynchronized with the maneuver speed, so as to recover a relevant target speed as a function of the flight point.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1153018 | Apr 2011 | FR | national |