The present invention relates to the field of HVAC and equipment exhaust ventilation control and energy saving ventilation methods. More specifically, the present invention relates to reducing energy used by an HVAC and equipment exhaust ventilation control system by maintaining only the constant flow rate necessary for the exhaust ventilation demand and automatically shutting down the equipment when appropriate.
Ventilation is the process of replacing air within a space. The process of replacing air includes both the removal of air from within the space and replacement of the air removed from the space. In most residential and industrial environments, both the removal and replacement of air are performed by mechanical means. Most often, the mechanical means comprise a heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) unit. The HVAC unit supplies air to a space by a forced air system using a fan. Many industrial systems remove air from a space by using an exhaust system that removes, but does not recirculate, air because the removed air is presumed to contain unhealthy or toxic fumes. Accordingly, a second fan system is used for exhausting air that is separate from the fan system that supplies air to the space. Because an industrial work space may contain equipment that generates unhealthy or toxic fumes into the air within the space, exhaust systems are often over-designed to facilitate rapid removal of harmful air from the industrial work space. Over-design of a ventilation system can include the providing of larger diameter ducts than are needed and larger fans to draw the over-designed air capacity out of the work space. Over-design of the exhaust system also typically means that a correspondingly over-designed air supply and exhaust system is also used. The over-design, alone, is inefficient and wastes energy. In addition, when fume-generating equipment is not operated or requires less ventilation than provided by the over-designed ventilation system, the ventilation system is even more inefficient and wastes energy. Current energy efficiency techniques focus on the generation of recovery of heat rather than increasing the efficiency of the ventilation process. In some applications, one ventilation system is shared with several fume-generating pieces of equipment and the flow rate of each equipment ventilation exhaust point is not controlled properly and affects each other during adjustment. Also, equipment closer to the ventilation system core experiences more suction forces.
The presently claimed invention solves the inefficiencies of the prior art ventilation systems by reducing the energy used for exhaust ventilation in response to detecting a reduction of the need for exhaust ventilation at one or more exhaust ventilation points. A work space contains fume-generating equipment and an exhaust ventilation point to remove the fumes generated by the equipment. When the equipment is not operating, a ventilation damper in the exhaust ventilation point is closed, and a ventilation force generated by an exhaust fan is reduced, thereby saving energy as well as reducing maintenance for the HVAC system due to reduced loading. In addition, the ventilation damper can be interlocked with an ON/OFF switch associated with the equipment such that the ventilation damper is opened when the equipment is turned ON, and the damper is closed when the equipment is turned OFF. A differential pressure sensor detects air flow across the ventilation damper and the flow rate data is fed back to a control unit for adjusting the damper position by the switch to achieve the desired flow rate requirement. A safety action can be taken if ventilation is not detected when a piece of equipment is turned ON. A safety action can comprise forcing the equipment to an OFF state, issuing an alarm, and other remedial actions described herein.
In a first aspect, a method of increasing the efficiency of an exhaust ventilation system is practiced on an exhaust ventilation system that comprises an exhaust ventilation fan that generates a ventilating force in an exhaust ventilation duct, an exhaust ventilation system controller, and a plurality of exhaust ventilation points coupled to the exhaust ventilation duct. Each exhaust ventilation point has an exhaust ventilation load, a controllable damper, a differential pressure sensor, an equipment ON/OFF switch operably coupled to a piece of equipment that is ventilated by the exhaust ventilation point, and an exhaust ventilation point controller coupled to the controllable damper, the differential pressure sensor, and the ON/OFF switch. The method comprises reducing, by the exhaust ventilation system controller, the ventilation force generated by the exhaust ventilation fan in response to detecting a reduction in the exhaust ventilation load of at least one exhaust ventilation point. Detecting a reduction in the exhaust ventilation load of at least one exhaust ventilation point comprises detecting that the controllable damper of the at least one exhaust ventilation point has closed. In some embodiments, detecting a reduction in the exhaust ventilation load of at least one exhaust ventilation point comprises detecting that the differential pressure across the controllable damper of the at least one exhaust ventilation point indicates that the controllable damper has closed. Detecting a reduction in the exhaust ventilation load of at least one exhaust ventilation point can alternatively comprise detecting that the ON/OFF switch for the piece of equipment that is ventilated by the at least one exhaust ventilation point has changed to the OFF position. In such embodiments, the method can further comprise delaying the detecting of the reduction in the exhaust ventilation load for a predetermined period of time after detecting that the ON/OFF switch has been changed to the OFF position. Preferably, the at least one exhaust ventilation point further comprises a fume detector coupled to the exhaust ventilation point controller, and detecting a reduction in the exhaust ventilation load of the at least one exhaust ventilation point further comprises determining that fumes detected by the fume detector are below a predetermined threshold value. In some embodiments, detecting a reduction in the exhaust ventilation load of the at least one exhaust ventilation point further comprises determining that fumes detected by the fume detector have remained below a predetermined threshold value for a first predetermined period of time. Detecting a reduction in the exhaust ventilation load of the at least one exhaust ventilation point can further comprise the exhaust ventilation point controller determining that fumes detected by the fume detector have remained below a predetermined threshold value for a second predetermined period of time, shorter than the first predetermined period time, during a window of time that the equipment is scheduled for non-operation.
In a second aspect, a non-transitory computer-readable medium is programmed with processor-executable instructions that, when executed, implement any of the above methods.
In a third aspect, a system for increasing the efficiency of an exhaust ventilation of an area comprises an exhaust ventilation system controller and an exhaust ventilation fan coupled to a system of duct work and to the exhaust ventilation system controller. The exhaust ventilation fan generates an exhaust ventilation force in the system of duct work. The system further comprises a plurality of exhaust ventilation points coupled to the system of duct work. Each exhaust ventilation point has an exhaust ventilation load for a piece of equipment, each piece of equipment has an ON/OFF switch, and each exhaust ventilation point further comprises an exhaust ventilation point controller communicatively coupled to the exhaust ventilation system controller and coupled to the ON/OFF switch of the piece of equipment ventilated by the exhaust ventilation point. Each exhaust ventilation point also has a damper coupled to the system of duct work and coupled to the exhaust ventilation point controller, and a differential pressure sensor coupled to the exhaust ventilation point controller. The exhaust ventilation system controller is configured to reduce the exhaust ventilation force generated by the exhaust ventilation fan in response to detecting a reduction in the exhaust ventilation load for at least one of the plurality of exhaust ventilation points. In a preferred embodiment, detecting a reduction in the exhaust ventilation load of at least one exhaust ventilation point comprises detecting that the controllable damper of the at least one exhaust ventilation point has been closed. In some embodiments, detecting a reduction in the exhaust ventilation load of the at least one exhaust ventilation points comprises detecting that the ON/OFF switch for the piece of equipment that is ventilated by the at least one exhaust ventilation point has changed to the OFF position. In such embodiments, preferably the exhaust ventilation point controller is further configured to delay the reduction in the exhaust ventilation force for a predetermined period of time after detecting that the ON/OFF switch has been changed to the OFF position. Also preferably, the exhaust ventilation point damper is closed after expiration of the predetermined period of time. In further preferred embodiments, each exhaust ventilation point further comprises a fume detector coupled to the exhaust ventilation point controller, the controller is configured to detect a reduction in the exhaust ventilation load of the at least one exhaust ventilation point and is further configured to determine that fumes detected the fume detector are below a predetermined threshold value. In some embodiments, the exhaust ventilation point controller is further configured to determine that fumes detected by the fume detector have remained below a predetermined threshold value for a first predetermined period of time. In such embodiments, preferably the exhaust ventilation point controller is further configured to determine that fumes detected by the fume detector have remained below a predetermined threshold value for a second predetermined period of time that is shorter than the first period of time, during a window of time that the equipment is scheduled for non-operation such as weekends, holidays, and nights. In some embodiments, the exhaust ventilation system controller comprises the plurality of exhaust ventilation point controllers. In another preferred embodiment, each exhaust ventilation point further comprises an alarm coupled to the exhaust ventilation point controller and the exhaust ventilation controller is configured to actuate the alarm upon detection by the exhaust ventilation controller of an alarm condition. In some embodiments, an alarm condition comprises one of: the fume detector detecting fumes above a predetermined fume threshold when the air flow detected by the differential pressure sensor is below a predetermined air flow threshold; detecting that the damper is in the open and the air flow is below a predetermined air flow threshold; and that the equipment ON/OFF switch is in the ON position and the air flow is below a predetermined air flow threshold.
In the detailed description of the drawings that follows, the embodiments described are intended to illustrate features of the presently claimed invention. Similar labels refer to similar or identical elements. Air flow rate characteristics have been described in terms of pressure, in pounds per square inch (PSI), in conjunction with a differential pressure sensor and a controllable damper. One skilled in the art will recognize that the air flow characteristics could also be described in terms of cubic feet per minute (CFM) in conjunction with an air flow meter to implement the claimed invention.
At step 520, the damper 135-1 is opened and the damper 135-2 is closed. At step 530, the exhaust ventilation system fan 210 is turned ON and its fan speed is increased until the differential pressure sensor 125-1 reaches its set point PSI. At step 540, the damper 135-2 is opened. By doing so, the exhaust ventilation system load is increased. Accordingly, at step 540, the fan speed is increased until the differential pressure sensor 125-2 reaches its set point PSI. At step 550, the fan 210 speed and damper positions 135-1 and 135-2 are fine tuned by a servo algorithm until the damper positions 135-1 and 135-2 and their associated differential pressure sensor readings 125-1 and 125-2 are stable at their respective set point PSI. The tuning operation is described in more detail below, under the heading, “System Fine Tuning/Servo Control”, below. At step 560, the exhaust ventilation system controller 400 stores the fan 210 speed, differential pressure sensor readings 125-1 and 125-2. After step 560, the method ends.
The method steps above are illustrative and not intended to be limiting. Some steps can be added, others deleted, and the steps can be performed in other orders.
The systems and methods of exhaust ventilation disclosed herein are dynamic in nature. An exhaust ventilation fan 210 provides a vacuum force to a system of ductwork that interconnects a plurality of exhaust ventilation points. For example, referring to
However, restoring the vacuum level in the ductwork to its previous level may not be sufficient to ensure that the air flow measured at each exhaust ventilation point 100 is operating at its set point PSI. Each damper 135 may need to be individually adjusted slightly until the air flow rate measured at each exhaust ventilation point is operating substantially at its set point PSI and the vacuum sensor 230 in the ductwork is also measuring substantially at its vacuum set point. To accomplish this dynamic adjustment to the exhaust ventilation system, the exhaust ventilation system controller 400 monitors the vacuum level in the ductwork as measured by the air flow sensor 230 and each exhaust ventilation point controller 300 monitors the air flow rate at each exhaust ventilation point 100. The exhaust ventilation point controller 300 determines the air flow rate as a function of the pressure differential provided by the differential pressure sensor 125 and the dimensions of the ducts 141 and/or 142, as the flow rate varies depending on the duct dimensions.
The exhaust ventilation system controller 400 receives messages from the plurality of exhaust ventilation point controllers 300 that indicate, for each exhaust ventilation point 100, air flow rate, fume level detection, and ON/OFF switch state at that exhaust ventilation point 100. The exhaust ventilation system controller 400 then uses a fine tuning algorithm, such as a servo algorithm, to generate responsive messages to some or all of the plurality of exhaust ventilation point controllers 300. A responsive message to an exhaust ventilation point controller 300 includes an instruction for adjusting the position of the damper 135 to effect a change in the air flow. An instruction for adjusting the position of the damper can comprise an instruction that no adjustment is needed to the damper position. A servo algorithm can be any servo algorithm now known or later developed, such as the proportional, integral, derivative gain (PID) algorithm known in the art. In operation, overall exhaust ventilation system air flow, and the air flow at each exhaust ventilation point, is controlled by a closed-loop feedback technique, such as a servo algorithm. One skilled in the art will recognize that each exhaust ventilation point controller 300 could, alternatively, servo the damper it controls to achieve the set point PSI for that exhaust ventilation point.
Fume detection can comprise detection of process by-products such as welding or soldering fumes that can contain metals, particulates and gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen fluoride (HF), nitric oxide (NO), and ozone (O2). Fume detection can further include detecting automobile-related fumes such as carbon monoxide (CO), gasoline, and diesel fuel. Other fuel fume detection includes methane, propane and natural gas detection. Fume detection can further include chemicals such as chlorine gas, hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen, and formaldehyde.
Ventilation can comprise exhaust ventilation only, or both supply of ventilating air and exhaust of ventilation air. Some ventilating systems are designed with a common motor that drives both a supply fan and a corresponding exhaust fan. The presently claimed invention contemplates reducing the exhaust ventilating force in response to a reduced demand for an exhaust ventilation. In systems that use a single motor to drive both a supply fan and an exhaust fan, the ventilation supply air is inherently reduced by a reduction in exhaust fan ventilating force. A ventilating system can comprise its own motor control such that a single analog signal can be used to command the drive of the exhaust fan motor. Alternatively, a digital value can be transmitted to the ventilating system corresponding to a drive force, a CFM requirement, or other motor or ventilation metric that affects exhaust fan drive force. In systems without built-in motor control logic, the exhaust ventilation force can be reduced by controlling the voltage and/or amperage supplied to the exhaust fan drive motor. The presently claimed invention contemplates integration of the teachings disclosed herein into a complete ventilating system. In addition, the presently claimed invention can be incorporated into an existing ventilating system.
The presently claimed invention saves energy by reducing the energy consumed by a ventilation system due to excess ventilation, particularly ventilation of equipment and workstations (collectively, “equipment”) that are not in operation. Non-operation is detected by monitoring an ON/OFF switch of a piece of equipment and by detecting the absence of fumes to be ventilated at the equipment. Detecting the absence of fumes is accomplished by monitoring an appropriate fume detector installed in an exhaust ventilation point at the equipment. Non-operation of a particular piece of equipment can also be programmed into either the exhaust ventilation system controller or the exhaust ventilation point controller for that piece of equipment, such as scheduling non-operation during a night shift or weekend. Such non-operation can be scheduled for an entire facility, for a single exhaust ventilation point, or a plurality of exhaust ventilation points. Non-operation can be inferred by the lack of fumes detected at the equipment over a pre-determined period of time. The predetermined period of time is selected as appropriate for the type of work associated with the equipment. The predetermined period of time can be shortened during off-hours, when it is anticipated that the equipment will be in a state of non-operation, such as late at night or on weekends. When non-operation is detected, the damper in the exhaust ventilation point is closed and the differential pressure sensor across the damper can be monitored for air flow. When non-operation of the equipment is detected by monitoring the ON/OFF switch, the closing of the damper is preferably delayed to be sure that no latent fumes remain that need to be ventilated. The delay can be a predetermined period of time or the delay can be continued until the detection of fumes falls below a predetermined threshold that is deemed to be safe by the designers of the ventilation system. An additional delay can also be implemented for after the equipment is turned OFF, for example when the ON/OFF switch is turned OFF. This additional delay can be implemented independent of fume detection, such as to remove heat from the equipment. In an exemplary application, an additional delay of one hour can be implemented before closing of the damper. Once the damper is closed, the ventilation point controller sends an appropriate signal to the ventilation system controller to reduce the exhaust ventilation force generated by the exhaust fan. Additionally, a lock-out signal can be asserted over the equipment ON/OFF switch to hold the equipment in an OFF state until the damper is re-opened.
An exhaust ventilation point comprises a differential pressure sensor across the damper that is monitored by the exhaust ventilation point controller. If the damper is opened, and the differential pressure sensor detects no air flow through the damper, an alarm is generated by the exhaust ventilation point controller. If the equipment switch is in the ON position and the damper has not opened, an alarm can be generated. If the equipment switch is ON and the damper is closed and fumes are detected above a threshold value, an alarm is generated. If the equipment switch is OFF and the damper is closed and fumes are detected above a threshold value, the damper is opened. The above alarm conditions are illustrative and not intended to be limiting. One of skill in the art, in possession of the present disclosure, can discern more alarm conditions that could be generated. Any of these alarm conditions can additionally remain asserted until a person manually resets the alarm state.
The above features have been described in terms of using a controller at each exhaust ventilation point and such controllers are communicatively coupled to an exhaust ventilation system controller. The architecture is essentially a master-slave distributed architecture, coupled by a communication network. It is further contemplated that such a system could be distributed across multiple physical locations or buildings and linked into a single system across a network such as the Internet. One skilled in the art will recognize that a controller could be allocated for a plurality of exhaust ventilation points in a “zone” configuration by physical locality. Alternatively a controller could be allocated for a plurality of exhaust ventilation points based upon the nature of the equipment used, fume types detected, or volume of ventilation required. The exhaust ventilation point controllers can alternatively be all implemented in a single central controller, or a combination thereof. In yet another configuration, any or all of the ventilation point controllers and the exhaust ventilation system controller can be implemented in a cloud computing environment using infrastructure as service, software as a service, and network as a service, providing a remote location for system monitoring and administration.
In operation, a method of increasing the energy efficiency of an exhaust ventilation system comprises individually controlling and monitoring a plurality of exhaust ventilation points that are interconnected by a common duct work that receives exhaust ventilation force from an exhaust ventilation fan. Each exhaust ventilation point provides exhaust ventilation for a piece of equipment having a monitorable and controllable ON/OFF switch. When that equipment is not in use, the exhaust ventilation point can be shut off, thereby reducing the load on the exhaust ventilation system. In response to shutting off an exhaust ventilation point, the exhaust ventilation system fan can be reduced in speed thereby saving energy. Algorithms for automatic shutoff of one or more exhaust ventilation control points can further enhance energy savings. For example, if a particular exhaust ventilation point has not detected fumes for a predetermined period of time, the exhaust ventilation point can be closed. In addition, during hours which a facility is known to not be working, or a smaller crew is working, particular exhaust ventilation points can be programmed to shut off and their associated equipment locked in the OFF position, for personnel safety.
It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that other modifications may be made to the embodiments without departing from the spirit of the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
This non-provisional patent application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of the U.S. provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/721,899, filed on Nov. 2, 2012, entitled “ENERGY SAVING-EXHAUST CONTROL AND AUTO SHUT OFF SYSTEM”, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3766906 | Jenn | Oct 1973 | A |
4160407 | Duym | Jul 1979 | A |
4273406 | Okagami | Jun 1981 | A |
4370703 | Risberg | Jan 1983 | A |
4563731 | Sato et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4645278 | Yevak et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4706553 | Sharp | Nov 1987 | A |
4712160 | Sato et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4788626 | Neidig et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4806110 | Lindeman | Feb 1989 | A |
4841220 | Tabisz et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4857822 | Tabisz et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4866367 | Ridley et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4890217 | Conway | Dec 1989 | A |
4893227 | Gallios et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4899256 | Sway-Tin | Feb 1990 | A |
4901069 | Veneruso | Feb 1990 | A |
5065302 | Kanazawa | Nov 1991 | A |
5090919 | Tsuji | Feb 1992 | A |
5092227 | Ahmed | Mar 1992 | A |
5101322 | Ghaem et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5126931 | Jitaru | Jun 1992 | A |
5132890 | Blandino | Jul 1992 | A |
5139009 | Walsh | Aug 1992 | A |
5205783 | Dieckert | Apr 1993 | A |
5235491 | Weiss | Aug 1993 | A |
5325283 | Farrington | Jun 1994 | A |
5365403 | Vinciarelli et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5373432 | Vollin | Dec 1994 | A |
5434768 | Jitaru et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5442540 | Hua | Aug 1995 | A |
5673185 | Albach et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5712772 | Telefus et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5764579 | McMasters | Jun 1998 | A |
5786992 | Vinciarelli et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790395 | Hagen | Aug 1998 | A |
5811895 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5838554 | Lanni | Nov 1998 | A |
5859771 | Kniegl | Jan 1999 | A |
5905369 | Ishii et al. | May 1999 | A |
5923543 | Choi | Jul 1999 | A |
5949672 | Bertnet | Sep 1999 | A |
5978238 | Liu | Nov 1999 | A |
6009008 | Pelly | Dec 1999 | A |
6091611 | Lanni | Jul 2000 | A |
6183302 | Daikuhara et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191957 | Peterson | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6272015 | Mangtani | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275397 | McClain | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6307761 | Nakagawa | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6323627 | Schmiederer et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6356465 | Yasumura | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6366476 | Yasumura | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385059 | Telefus et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6388897 | Ying et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6390854 | Yamamoto et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6396716 | Liu et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6452816 | Kuranki | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6459175 | Potega | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6487098 | Malik et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6549409 | Saxelby et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6578253 | Herbert | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6721192 | Yang et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6739967 | Saito | May 2004 | B2 |
6775162 | Mihai et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6890252 | Liu | May 2005 | B2 |
6894461 | Hack et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6914532 | Crooks | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6919715 | Muratov et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6989997 | Xu | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7035126 | Lanni | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7038406 | Wilson | May 2006 | B2 |
7102251 | West | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7139180 | Herbert | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7202640 | Morita | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7208833 | Nobori et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7212420 | Liao | May 2007 | B2 |
7239532 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7274175 | Manolescu | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7275533 | Soeholm | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7315460 | Kyono | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7386286 | Petrovic et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7450388 | Beihoff et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7564706 | Herbert | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7596007 | Phadke | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7701305 | Lin et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7830684 | Taylor | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7924578 | Jansen et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8059434 | Huang et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8102678 | Jungreis | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8125181 | Gregg et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8126181 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8134848 | Whittam et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8155368 | Cheung et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8194417 | Chang | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8207717 | Urono et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8243472 | Chang et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8344689 | Boguslavskij | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8369111 | Balakrishnan et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8400801 | Shinoda | Mar 2013 | B2 |
20010036091 | Yasumura | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020008963 | Dibene et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020011823 | Lee | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020036200 | Ulrich et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030035303 | Balakrishnan et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030112645 | Schlecht | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040088082 | Ahmed | May 2004 | A1 |
20040183510 | Sutardja et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040252529 | Huber et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050024016 | Breen et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036338 | Porter et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050117376 | Wilson | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138437 | Allen et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050194942 | Hack et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050225257 | Green | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050254268 | Reinhard et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060002155 | Shteynberg et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060022637 | Wang et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060152947 | Baker et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060213890 | Kooken et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060232220 | Melis | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070040516 | Chen | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070087784 | Yamamoto et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070120542 | LeMay | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121981 | Koh et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070138971 | Chen | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070202795 | Seliger | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070242487 | Orr | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070247091 | Maiocchi | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070263415 | Jansen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080018265 | Lee et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080043496 | Yang | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080191667 | Kernahan et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090034299 | Lev | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090045889 | Goergen et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090196073 | Nakahori | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090207637 | Boeke | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090290384 | Jungreis | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090300400 | DuBose | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100039833 | Coulson et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100289466 | Telefus et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100317216 | Pocrass | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322441 | Weiss et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110132899 | Shimomugi et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110211376 | Hosotani | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110261590 | Liu | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110284091 | Livchak | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120112657 | Van Der Veen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120113686 | Telefus et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
EE Times.com—“Team Claims Midrange Wireless Energy Transfer”, by R. Colin Johnson, 4 pages, Nov. 6, 2007. |
EE Times. com—“Wireless Beacon Could Recharge Consumer Devices”, by R. Colin Johnson, 3 pages, Nov. 6, 2007. |
Novel Zero-Voltage and Zero-Current Switching (ZVZCS) Full Bridge PWM converter Using Coupled Output Inductor, Sep. 2002 IEEE, pp. 641-648. |
“New Architectures for Radio-Frequency dc/dc Power Conversion”, Juan Rivas et al., Laboratory for Electromagnetic and Electronic Systems, Jan. 2004, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Room 10-171 Cambridge, MA 02139, pp. 4074-4084. |
“Randomized Modulation in Power Electronic Converters”. Aleksander M. Stankovic, member IEEE, and Hanoch Lev-Ari, vol. 90, No. 5, May 2002, pp. 782-799. |
“Analysis and Special Characteristics of a Spread-Spectrum Technique for Conducted EMI Suppression”, K.K. tse, et al. Member IEEE, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 15., No. 2, Mar. 2000, pp. 399-410. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140127987 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61721899 | Nov 2012 | US |