Engaging test slots

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9001456
  • Patent Number
    9,001,456
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, August 31, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 7, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
In general, a test slot is engaged with automated machinery to inhibit movement of the test slot, thereby inhibiting transmission of vibration from the test slot to its surroundings. While the automated machinery is engaged with the test slot, the automated machinery is actuated to insert a storage device into the test slot, or remove the storage device from the test slot.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to engaging test slots and related devices, systems, and methods.


BACKGROUND

Storage device manufacturers typically test manufactured storage devices for compliance with a collection of requirements. Test equipment and techniques exist for testing large numbers of storage devices serially or in parallel. Manufacturers tend to test large numbers of storage devices simultaneously. Storage device testing systems typically include one or more tester racks having multiple test slots that receive storage devices for testing. In some cases, the storage devices are placed in carriers which are used for loading and unloading the storage devices to and from the test racks.


The testing environment immediately around the storage device is regulated. Minimum temperature fluctuations in the testing environment may be critical for accurate test conditions and for safety of the storage devices. In addition, the latest generations of disk drives, which have higher capacities, faster rotational speeds and smaller head clearance, are more sensitive to vibration. Excess vibration can affect the reliability of test results and the integrity of electrical connections. Under test conditions, the drives themselves can propagate vibrations through supporting structures or fixtures to adjacent units. This vibration “cross-talking,” together with external sources of vibration, contributes to bump errors, head slap and non-repetitive run-out (NRRO), which may result in lower yields and increased manufacturing costs. Current disk drive testing systems employ automation and structural support systems that contribute to excess vibrations in the system and/or require large footprints.


SUMMARY

In general, this disclosure relates to engaging test slots and related devices, systems, methods, and means.


In one aspect, a test slot is engaged with automated machinery to inhibit movement of the test slot, thereby inhibiting transmission of vibration from the test slot to its surroundings. While the automated machinery is engaged with the test slot, the automated machinery is actuated to insert a storage device into the test slot, or remove the storage device from the test slot.


In another aspect, an apparatus includes at least one engaging element configured to engage a test slot to inhibit movement of the test slot, thereby inhibiting transmission of vibration from the test slot to its surroundings. The apparatus further includes an automated transporter, while the at least one engaging element is engaged with the test slot, configured to insert a storage device into the test slot; or remove the storage device from the test slot.


In another aspect, automated machinery includes means for engaging a test slot to inhibit movement of the test slot, thereby inhibiting transmission of vibration from the test slot to its surroundings. The automated machinery also includes means for, while the automated machinery is engaged with the test slot, inserting a storage device into the test slot, or removing the storage device from the test slot.


Embodiments may include one or more of the following features. The automated machinery engages the test slot with one or more actuators. The one or more actuators include one or more first engaging elements. The test slot includes one or more second engaging elements. Engaging the test slot includes causing the one first engaging elements to temporarily connect to the one or more second engaging elements. The one or more first engaging elements may include an element selected from a group consisting of: a pin, a recess, a slot, a magnet, an adhesive, a clasp, and a hook. The one or more first engaging elements may alternatively be constructed so as to present a surface to engage the test slot by friction. The one or more second engaging elements may include an element selected from a group consisting of: a pin, a recess, a slot, a magnet, an adhesive, a clasp, and a hook. The one or more second engaging elements may alternatively be constructed so as to present a surface to be engaged by friction. The automated machinery includes a robot that includes a manipulator for carrying the storage device. The actuators are coupled to the robot and/or the manipulator. The storage device is carried by a storage device transporter. The automated machinery includes a robot and a manipulator for engaging the storage device transporter, and the actuators are coupled to the robot and/or the manipulator. The at least engaging element is configured to temporarily connect to one or more second engaging elements of the test slot. The at least one engaging element includes an element selected from a group consisting of a pin, a recess, a slot, a magnet, an adhesive, a clasp, and a hook. The at least one engaging element is adapted to engage the test slot by friction. The one or more second engaging elements include an element selected from a group consisting of a pin, a recess, a slot, a magnet, an adhesive, a clasp, and a hook. The automated transporter comprises a robot that comprises a manipulator for carrying the storage device, wherein the at least one engaging element is coupled to the robot and/or the manipulator. The storage device is carried by the automated transporter.


The details of one or more embodiments are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.





DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a storage device testing system.



FIG. 2A is perspective view of a test rack.



FIG. 2B is a detailed perspective view of a carrier receptacle from the test rack of FIG. 2A.



FIGS. 3A and 3B are front and back perspective views, respectively, of a test slot carrier.



FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a test slot assembly.



FIG. 5 is a top view of a storage device testing system.



FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a storage device testing system.



FIGS. 7A and 7B are perspective views of a storage device transporter.



FIG. 8A is a perspective view of a storage device transporter supporting a storage device.



FIG. 8B is a perspective view of a storage device transporter receiving a storage device.



FIG. 8C is a perspective view of a storage device transporter carrying a storage device aligned for insertion into a test slot.



FIG. 9 is a schematic view of test circuitry.



FIGS. 10A and 10B are perspective views of a front portion of a test slot.



FIG. 11 is a perspective view of a front portion of a test slot being engaged by actuators.



FIGS. 12A and 12B are perspective views of actuators.



FIG. 13 is a perspective views of a transporter being inserted into a test slot while the test slot is engaged by actuators.





Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

System Overview


As shown in FIG. 1, a storage device testing system 10 includes a plurality of test racks 100 (e.g., 10 test racks shown), a transfer station 200, and a robot 300 (sometimes referred to as an “automated transporter”). As shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B, each test rack 100 generally includes a chassis 102. The chassis 102 can be constructed from a plurality of structural members 104 (e.g., formed sheet metal, extruded aluminum, steel tubing, and/or composite members) which are fastened together and together define a plurality of carrier receptacles 106.


Each carrier receptacle 106 can support a test slot carrier 110. As shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B, each test slot carrier 110 supports a plurality of test slot assemblies 120. Different ones of the test slot carriers 110 can be configured for performing different types of tests and/or for testing different types of storage devices. The test slot carriers 110 are also interchangeable with each other within among the many carrier receptacles 106 within the testing system 10 allowing for adaptation and/or customization of the testing system 10, e.g., based on testing needs.


A storage device, as used herein, includes disk drives, solid state drives, memory devices, and any device that benefits from asynchronous testing. A disk drive is generally a non-volatile storage device which stores digitally encoded data on rapidly rotating platters with magnetic surfaces. A solid-state drive (SSD) is a data storage device that uses solid-state memory to store persistent data. An SSD using SRAM or DRAM (instead of flash memory) is often called a RAM-drive. The term solid-state generally distinguishes solid-state electronics from electromechanical devices.


As shown in FIG. 4, each test slot assembly 120 includes a storage device transporter 400, a test slot 500, and an associated air mover assembly 700. The storage device transporter 400 may be used for capturing storage devices 600 (e.g., from the transfer station 200) and for transporting the storage device 600 to one of the test slots 500 for testing. The test slot includes a rear portion 500B and a front portion 500A. The front portion 500A defines a test compartment 526 for receiving one of the storage device transporters 400. The rear portion 500B carries a connection interface board 520, which carries a connection interface circuit 182 (FIG. 9).


Referring to FIGS. 5 and 6, the robot 300 includes a robotic arm 310 and a manipulator 312 (FIG. 5) disposed at a distal end of the robotic arm 310. The robotic arm 310 defines a first axis 314 (FIG. 6) normal to a floor surface 316 and is operable to rotate through a predetermined arc about and extends radially from the first axis 314 within a robot operating area 318. The robotic arm 310 is configured to independently service each test slot 500 by transferring storage devices 600 between the transfer station 200 and the test racks 100. In some embodiments, the robotic arm 310 is configured to remove a storage device transporter 400 from one of the test slots 500 with the manipulator 312, then pick up a storage device 600 from the transfer station 200 with the storage device transporter 400, and then return the storage device transporter 400, with a storage device 600 therein, to the test slot 500 for testing of the storage device 600. After testing, the robotic arm 310 retrieves the storage device transporter 400, along with the supported storage device 600, from one of the test slots 500 and returns it to the transfer station 200 (or moves it to another one of the test slots 500) by manipulation of the storage device transporter 400 (i.e., with the manipulator 312). In some embodiments, the robotic arm 310 is configured to pick up a storage device 600 from the transfer station 200 with the manipulator 312, then move the storage device 600 to a test slot 500, and deposit the storage device 600 in the test slot 500 by means of depositing the storage device 600 in the storage device transporter 400 and then inserting the storage device transporter in the test slot 500. After testing, the robotic arm 310 uses the manipulator 312 to remove the storage device 600 from the storage device transporter 400 and return it to the transfer station 200.


Referring to FIGS. 7A and 7B, the storage device transporter 400 includes a frame 410 and a clamping mechanism 450. The frame 410 includes a face plate 412. As shown in FIG. 7A, along a first surface 414, the face plate 412 defines an indentation 416. The indentation 416 can be releaseably engaged by the manipulator 312 (FIG. 5) of the robotic arm 310, which allows the robotic arm 310 to grab and move the transporter 400. In use, one of the storage device transporters 400 is removed from one of the test slots 500 with the robot 300 (e.g., by grabbing, or otherwise engaging, the indentation 416 of the transporter 400 with the manipulator 312 of the robot 300). The frame 410 defines a substantially U-shaped opening 415 formed by sidewalls 418 and a base plate 420.


Referring to FIGS. 8A, 8B, and 8C, with the storage device 600 in place within the frame 410 of the storage device transporter 400, the storage device transporter 400 and the storage device 600 together can be moved by the robotic arm 310 (FIG. 5) for placement within one of the test slots 500. The manipulator 312 (FIG. 5) is also configured to initiate actuation of a clamping mechanism 450 disposed in the storage device transporter 400. Actuating the clamping mechanism 450 inhibits movement of the storage device 600 relative to the storage device transporter 400. Releasing the clamping mechanism 450 allows for insertion of the storage device transporter 400 into one of the test slots 500. The clamping mechanism 450 may also be configured to engage the test slot 500, once received therein, to inhibit movement of the storage device transporter 400 relative to the test slot 500. In such implementations, once the storage device 600 is in the test position, the clamping mechanism 450 is engaged again (e.g., by the manipulator 312) to inhibit movement of the storage device transporter 400 relative to the test slot 500. The clamping of the transporter 400 in this manner can help to reduce vibrations during testing. Additional details of the transporter 400 and the clamping mechanism 450 and other details and features combinable with those described herein may be found in the following U.S. patent application filed Jul. 15, 2009, entitled “CONDUCTIVE HEATING”, with, inventors: Brian S. Merrow et al., and having assigned Ser. No. 12/503,593, the entire contents of the which are hereby incorporated by reference.


Referring to FIG. 9, in some implementations, the storage device testing system 10 can also include at least one computer 130 in communication with the test slots 500. The computer 130 may be configured to provide inventory control of the storage devices 600 and/or an automation interface to control the storage device testing system 10. Test electronics 160 are in communication with each test slot 500. The test electronics 160 are in electrical communication with connection interface circuits 182 that are disposed within each the test slots 500. These connection interface circuits 182 are arranged for electrical communication with a storage device 600 received within the associated test slot 500, and thereby provide for communication between the test electronics 160 and storage devices 600 within the test slots 500, e.g., for executing test routines. The test routines may include a functionality test, which can include testing the amount of power received by the storage device 600, the operating temperature, the ability to read and write data, and the ability to read and write data at different temperatures (e.g. read while hot and write while cold, or vice versa). The functionality test may test every memory sector of the storage device 600 or only random samplings. The functionality test may test an operating temperature of the storage device 600 and also the data integrity of communications with the storage device 600.


As shown in FIG. 9, a power system 170 supplies power to the storage device testing system 10. The power system 170 may monitor and/or regulate power to the received storage device 600 in the test slot 500


Engaging the Test Slot


As mentioned above, storage devices (e.g., storage device 600) are susceptible to shock and vibration during operation and testing. Shock and vibration events can also occur, for example, when a storage device is inserted or removed from a test slot 500. During testing, storage devices are frequently swapped out for different storage devices while the surrounding storage devices are operating or being tested. In some examples, it can be difficult to insert or remove a storage device from the test slot 500 without causing a frame (e.g., frame 502) of the test slot 500 from bumping into the chassis 102 of the test rack 100 (FIGS. 2A and 2B). An impact produced in this way can create a shock or vibration even that is transmitted to adjacent storage devices in other test slots, which degrades the isolation scheme of the test rack 100. This problem can be amplified by the high density of the test rack 100, as the test slots can be located in close proximity to one another to conserve space.


In some examples, additional shock or vibration events can be created while the storage device 600 is pushed against or pulled away from one or more electrical connecting elements located in the test slot 500. In order for the storage device 500 to mate or un-mate with the electrical connecting elements, some degree of force (e.g., 45 Newtons) must be exerted on the storage device 600. This force can be greater than the force require to insert the storage device 600 into the test slot 500.


One way to reduce the likelihood of causing shock or vibration events is to use precision automation. As described above, an automated transporter (e.g., the robot 300 (FIG. 3) can be more precise than a human in precisely inserting or removing a storage device with the correct amount of force. In some examples, however, the location of the test slot 500 may change with loading and with temperature, as the isolators associated with the test slot 500 change shape under stress or with temperature. The automated transporter may thus need to be augmented with a camera, laser position sensors, or the like, to sense the location of the frame. These sensors may slow down the operation, and may still be insufficient, as the mounting frame may move in three linear and three rotary dimensions, and it is difficult to measure and compensate for all of these cost-effectively and quickly.


In some examples, a portion of the robot 300 can engage (e.g., grab, pinch, hug, stabilize, attach to, or the like) a frame of the test slot 500 in order to reduce shock and vibration events caused by inserting or removing a storage device. Engaging the frame of the test slot inhibits movement of the test slot relative to a chassis supporting the test slot, including inhibiting movement in the direction used to insert or remove a storage device from the test slot. By holding on to the test slot 500, the robot 300 can push or pull the storage device relative to the test slot 500 without moving the test slot 500. Thus, forces exerted on the test slot 500 are transmitted to the robot 300, rather than to the chassis 102 and adjacent storage devices.


Certain features of the test slot 500 or the robot 300 can allow the robot 300 to more easily or more effectively engage the test slot 500. These features can also allow the robot 300 to approximately register relative to the test slot 500, and then engage the test slot 500 while moving it into a precise alignment with the robot 300.



FIGS. 10A and 10B illustrate opposite sides of the test slot 500 (only the front portion 500A of the test slot 500 is shown for clarity). The test slot 500 includes sidewalls 502, 504 with engaging elements 506, 508, and 510 mounted thereon. The engaging elements 506, 508, and 510 are configured to assist the robot 300 in temporarily engaging the test slot 500 before, during, or after the insertion or removal of a storage device. The engaging elements 506, 508, and 510 are configured to engage corresponding engaging elements 512, 514 (FIG. 11) located on actuators 516, 518 (FIG. 11) associated with the robot 300. In this example, the engaging elements 512, 514 are recesses in surfaces 513, 515 of the actuators 516, 518.


In the example of FIGS. 10A, 10B, 11, and 12, the engaging elements 506, 508, and 510 are kinematic pins that are configured to mate with recesses 512, 514 of actuators 516, 518, respectively. Both of the actuators 516, 518 are associated with the robot. For example, as shown in FIG. 13, the actuators 516, 518 are arranged on opposing sides of the manipulator 312 of the robot 300. As shown in FIGS. 11 and 12, the actuator 516 includes an inner surface 513 that is arranged to face the sidewall 502 of the test slot 500. The inner surface 513 includes the engaging element 512, which in this example is a recess configured to mate with the engaging element 506 (a kinematic pin) when the robot 300 engages the test slot 500. Similarly, the actuator 518 includes an inner surface 515 that includes engaging element 514, which in this example is a v-shaped recess configured to mate with engaging elements 508 and 510 when the robot 300 engages the test slot 500. The V-shaped groove and engaging elements 508 and 510 are shaped to form a kinematic connection.



FIG. 13 illustrates an example in which the robot 300 inserts the storage device transporter 400 (which contains storage device 600) into the test slot 500. The actuators 516, 518 are arranged on opposing sides of, and extend outward from, the manipulator 312 of the robot 300. Thus, as the robot 300 moves in the direction of the test slot 500, the actuators 516, 518 protrude in front of the manipulator 312 such that they may contact the test slot 500 before the transporter 400 is inserted into the test slot 500.


In some examples, after the robot 300 extends the manipulator 312 (and the attached actuators 516, 518) toward the test slot 500, the robot 300 may use cameras or other sensors to crudely align the manipulator 312 and actuators 516, 518 with the test slot 500. Once the actuators are in a position to engage the test slot 500 (e.g., by aligning the engaging element 506 with the recess 512 and by aligning the engaging elements 508, 510 with the recess 514), the actuators 516, 518 can “grab” the test slot 500 by causing the actuators 516, 518 to move in directions 520, 522, respectively. While in some examples, this force can be applied pneumatically, hydraulically, or mechanically, the dimensions of the actuators 516, 518 relative to the test slot 500 can be design such that the actuators 516, 518 simply “slip” over the engaging elements.


Once the engaging elements 506, 508, 510 have mated with the recesses 512, 514, an indication can be sent to the robot 300 that the robot 300 has successfully engaged the test slot 500. After this indication has been received, the manipulator 312 can begin to insert the transporter 400 into the test slot 500 by applying force to the transporter 400 in a direction 524. The manipulator 312 may continue to apply force to the transporter 400 until the transporter 400 or storage device 600 has successfully mated with one or more connectors (not shown) located near the distal end 526 of the test slot 500. Again, an indication can be sent to the robot 300 when the transporter and storage device have been successfully inserted into the test slot 500.


By gripping the test slot 500 prior to inserting the transporter 400 into the test slot 500, any impact of the transporter 400 or storage device 600 against a frame of the test slot 500 will not transmit vibration energy to the chassis 102. Instead, because the actuators 516, 518 are engaged with the test slot 500, any shock or vibration energy will be absorbed by the actuators 516, 518, the manipulator 312, and the robot 300. If the robot 300, the manipulator 312, and the actuators 516, 518 are mechanically isolated from the test rack 100, this energy will not be transferred to the test rack 100 or the other storage devices being tested therein.


Similar techniques can be used to remove the transporter 400 and/or the storage device 600 from the test slot 500. In that case, the robot 300 first engages the test slot 500 with the actuators 516, 518 to stabilize the test slot 500. Once the actuators 516, 518 have successfully engaged the test slot 500, the manipulator 312 can begin removing the transporter 400 and/or storage device 600 from the test slot 500 (e.g., the manipulator can being engaging the transporter 400, or can begin to remove a transporter 400 with which the manipulator 312 is already interfacing).


While in the examples above there are two actuators 516, 518, any number or type of actuators can be used.


While in the examples above the engagement elements 506, 508, and 510 are described as kinematic pins, other types of engagement elements can be used. For example the engaging elements may be self-aligning, kinematic, non self-aligning, non kinematic, or a combination thereof. Exemplary engagement elements may include pins, pegs, recesses, slots, holes, detents, grooves, friction elements, or magnets. In the case where the engagement elements use friction to engage the test slot, the engagement elements may include one or more friction pads, or one or more textured surfaces of the engagement elements. In some examples, the engagement elements may engage the test slot using a native friction associated with the engagement elements. Similarly, while the actuators 516, 518 have been described as including recesses 512, 514, any suitable engagement element can be used to correspond with the engagement elements of the test slot 500. Moreover, the test slot 500 and the actuators 516, 518 can include any number, shape, size, or type of engagement elements. The test slot can also be engaged in locations on the test slot in addition to or instead of the side walls of the test slot 500. For example, the test slot can be engaged at side and the front, the side and the top, the side and the bottom, the top and the bottom, or any combination thereof.


In some examples, the actuators 516, 518 can engage the test slot 500 after a portion of the storage device 600 or transporter 400 has already been inserted into or removed from the test slot 500. Stated differently, the robot 300 may not use the actuators 516, 518 to “grip” the test slot 500 until at least part of the insertion or removal action has been completed.


In some examples, automated machinery such as the robot 300 (FIG. 1) can be configured to transport storage devices (e.g., disk drives) without the need for a storage device transporter. For example, the robot (or other automated machinery) may directly contact a storage device in order to transport it to, and deposit it in, a test slot (e.g., test slot 500 (FIG. 4)), without requiring that the storage device be arranged within a storage device transporter.


A number of implementations have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. For example, the protrusions on the test slots that interface with the isolators in the body could be embodied as protrusions on the body that interface with isolators on the test slots. Accordingly, other implementations are within the scope of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: using automated machinery to clamp a test slot to inhibit movement of the test slot relative to a chassis supporting the test slot, the inhibited movement being in the direction used to insert or remove a storage device from the test slot, thereby inhibiting transmission of vibration from the test slot to its surroundings; andwhile the automated machinery is engaged with the test slot, actuating the automated machinery to: insert a storage device into the test slot; orremove the storage device from the test slot.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the automated machinery engages the test slot with one or more actuators.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the one or more actuators comprise one or more first engaging elements.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the test slot comprises one or more second engaging elements.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein clamping the test slot comprises: causing the one or more first engaging elements to temporarily connect to the one or more second engaging elements.
  • 6. The method of claim 2, wherein the automated machinery comprises a robot that comprises a manipulator for carrying the storage device.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the actuators are coupled to the robot and/or the manipulator.
  • 8. The method of claim 3, wherein the one or more first engaging elements comprise an element selected from a group consisting of: a pin, a recess, a slot, a magnet, an adhesive, a clasp, and a hook.
  • 9. The method of claim 3, wherein the one or more of the first engaging elements are adapted to engage the test slot by friction.
  • 10. The method of claim 4, wherein the one or more second engaging elements comprise an element selected from a group consisting of: a pin, a recess, a slot, a magnet, an adhesive, a clasp, and a hook.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the storage device is carried by a storage device transporter.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the automated machinery comprises a robot and a manipulator for engaging the storage device transporter; and wherein the actuators are coupled to the robot and/or the manipulator.
  • 13. An apparatus comprising: at least one engaging element configured to clamp a test slot to inhibit movement of the test slot relative to a chassis supporting the test slot, the inhibited movement being in the direction used to insert or remove a storage device from the test slot, thereby inhibiting transmission of vibration from the test slot to its surroundings; andan automated transporter configured to engage the at least one engaging element and, while the at least one engaging element is engaged with the test slot, configured to: insert a storage device into the test slot; orremove the storage device from the test slot;wherein the automated transporter comprises a robot that comprises a manipulator for carrying the storage device; andwherein the at least one engaging element is coupled to the robot and/or the manipulator.
  • 14. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the at least one engaging element is configured to temporarily connect to one or more second engaging elements of the test slot.
  • 15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the one or more second engaging elements comprise an element selected from a group consisting of: a pin, a recess, a slot, a magnet, an adhesive, a clasp, and a hook.
  • 16. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the at least one engaging element comprises an element selected from a group consisting of: a pin, a recess, a slot, a magnet, an adhesive, a clasp, and a hook.
  • 17. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the at least one engaging element is adapted to engage the test slot by friction.
  • 18. The apparatus of claim 13 wherein the storage device is carried by the automated transporter.
US Referenced Citations (392)
Number Name Date Kind
557186 Cahill Mar 1896 A
2224407 Passur Dec 1940 A
2380026 Clarke Jul 1945 A
2631775 Gordon Mar 1953 A
2635524 Jenkins Apr 1953 A
3120166 Lyman Feb 1964 A
3360032 Sherwood Dec 1967 A
3364838 Bradley Jan 1968 A
3517601 Courchesne Jun 1970 A
3845286 Aronstein et al. Oct 1974 A
4147299 Freeman Apr 1979 A
4233644 Hwang et al. Nov 1980 A
4336748 Martin et al. Jun 1982 A
4379259 Varadi et al. Apr 1983 A
4477127 Kume Oct 1984 A
4495545 Dufresne et al. Jan 1985 A
4526318 Fleming et al. Jul 1985 A
4620248 Gitzendanner Oct 1986 A
4648007 Garner Mar 1987 A
4654732 Mesher Mar 1987 A
4665455 Mesher May 1987 A
4683424 Cutright et al. Jul 1987 A
4685303 Branc et al. Aug 1987 A
4688124 Scribner et al. Aug 1987 A
4713714 Gatti et al. Dec 1987 A
4739444 Zushi et al. Apr 1988 A
4754397 Varaiya et al. Jun 1988 A
4768285 Woodman, Jr. Sep 1988 A
4778063 Ueberreiter Oct 1988 A
4801234 Cedrone Jan 1989 A
4809881 Becker Mar 1989 A
4817273 Lape et al. Apr 1989 A
4817934 McCormick et al. Apr 1989 A
4851965 Gabuzda et al. Jul 1989 A
4881591 Rignall Nov 1989 A
4888549 Wilson et al. Dec 1989 A
4911281 Jenkner Mar 1990 A
4967155 Magnuson Oct 1990 A
5012187 Littlebury Apr 1991 A
5045960 Eding Sep 1991 A
5061630 Knopf et al. Oct 1991 A
5119270 Bolton et al. Jun 1992 A
5122914 Hanson Jun 1992 A
5127684 Klotz et al. Jul 1992 A
5128813 Lee Jul 1992 A
5136395 Ishii et al. Aug 1992 A
5158132 Guillemot Oct 1992 A
5168424 Bolton et al. Dec 1992 A
5171183 Pollard et al. Dec 1992 A
5173819 Takahashi et al. Dec 1992 A
5176202 Richard Jan 1993 A
5205132 Fu Apr 1993 A
5206772 Hirano et al. Apr 1993 A
5207613 Ferchau et al. May 1993 A
5210680 Scheibler May 1993 A
5237484 Ferchau et al. Aug 1993 A
5263537 Plucinski et al. Nov 1993 A
5269698 Singer Dec 1993 A
5295392 Hensel et al. Mar 1994 A
5309323 Gray et al. May 1994 A
5325263 Singer et al. Jun 1994 A
5349486 Sugimoto et al. Sep 1994 A
5368072 Cote Nov 1994 A
5374395 Robinson et al. Dec 1994 A
5379229 Parsons et al. Jan 1995 A
5398058 Hattori Mar 1995 A
5412534 Cutts et al. May 1995 A
5414591 Kimura et al. May 1995 A
5426581 Kishi et al. Jun 1995 A
5469037 McMurtrey, Sr. et al. Nov 1995 A
5477416 Schkrohowsky et al. Dec 1995 A
5484012 Hiratsuka Jan 1996 A
5486681 Dagnac et al. Jan 1996 A
5487579 Woodruff Jan 1996 A
5491610 Mok et al. Feb 1996 A
5543727 Bushard et al. Aug 1996 A
5546250 Diel Aug 1996 A
5557186 McMurtrey, Sr. et al. Sep 1996 A
5563768 Perdue Oct 1996 A
5570740 Flores et al. Nov 1996 A
5593380 Bittikofer Jan 1997 A
5601141 Gordon et al. Feb 1997 A
5604662 Anderson et al. Feb 1997 A
5610893 Soga et al. Mar 1997 A
5617430 Angelotti et al. Apr 1997 A
5644705 Stanley Jul 1997 A
5646918 Dimitri et al. Jul 1997 A
5654846 Wicks et al. Aug 1997 A
5673029 Behl et al. Sep 1997 A
5694290 Chang Dec 1997 A
5718627 Wicks Feb 1998 A
5718628 Nakazato et al. Feb 1998 A
5731928 Jabbari et al. Mar 1998 A
5751549 Eberhardt et al. May 1998 A
5754365 Beck et al. May 1998 A
5761032 Jones Jun 1998 A
5764615 Ware et al. Jun 1998 A
5793610 Schmitt et al. Aug 1998 A
5811678 Hirano Sep 1998 A
5812761 Seki et al. Sep 1998 A
5819842 Potter et al. Oct 1998 A
5831525 Harvey Nov 1998 A
5851143 Hamid Dec 1998 A
5859409 Kim et al. Jan 1999 A
5859540 Fukumoto Jan 1999 A
5862037 Behl Jan 1999 A
5870630 Reasoner et al. Feb 1999 A
5886639 Behl et al. Mar 1999 A
5890959 Pettit et al. Apr 1999 A
5912799 Grouell et al. Jun 1999 A
5913926 Anderson et al. Jun 1999 A
5914856 Morton et al. Jun 1999 A
5927386 Lin Jul 1999 A
5956301 Dimitri et al. Sep 1999 A
5959834 Chang Sep 1999 A
5999356 Dimitri et al. Dec 1999 A
5999365 Hasegawa et al. Dec 1999 A
6000623 Blatti et al. Dec 1999 A
6005404 Cochran et al. Dec 1999 A
6005770 Schmitt Dec 1999 A
6008636 Miller et al. Dec 1999 A
6008984 Cunningham et al. Dec 1999 A
6011689 Wrycraft Jan 2000 A
6031717 Baddour et al. Feb 2000 A
6034870 Osborn et al. Mar 2000 A
6042348 Aakalu et al. Mar 2000 A
6045113 Itakura Apr 2000 A
6055814 Song May 2000 A
6066822 Nemoto et al. May 2000 A
6067225 Reznikov et al. May 2000 A
6069792 Nelik May 2000 A
6084768 Bolognia Jul 2000 A
6094342 Dague et al. Jul 2000 A
6104607 Behl Aug 2000 A
6115250 Schmitt Sep 2000 A
6122131 Jeppson Sep 2000 A
6122232 Schell et al. Sep 2000 A
6124707 Kim et al. Sep 2000 A
6130817 Flotho et al. Oct 2000 A
6144553 Hileman et al. Nov 2000 A
6153999 Borrego Nov 2000 A
6166901 Gamble et al. Dec 2000 A
6169413 Pack et al. Jan 2001 B1
6169930 Blachek et al. Jan 2001 B1
6177805 Pih Jan 2001 B1
6178835 Orriss et al. Jan 2001 B1
6181557 Gatti Jan 2001 B1
6185065 Hasegawa et al. Feb 2001 B1
6185097 Behl Feb 2001 B1
6188191 Frees et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192282 Smith et al. Feb 2001 B1
6193339 Behl et al. Feb 2001 B1
6209842 Anderson et al. Apr 2001 B1
6227516 Webster, Jr. et al. May 2001 B1
6229275 Yamamoto May 2001 B1
6231145 Liu May 2001 B1
6233148 Shen May 2001 B1
6236563 Buican et al. May 2001 B1
6247944 Bolognia et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249824 Henrichs Jun 2001 B1
6252769 Tullstedt et al. Jun 2001 B1
6262863 Ostwald et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272007 Kitlas et al. Aug 2001 B1
6272767 Botruff et al. Aug 2001 B1
6281677 Cosci et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282501 Assouad Aug 2001 B1
6285524 Boigenzahn et al. Sep 2001 B1
6289678 Pandolfi Sep 2001 B1
6297950 Erwin Oct 2001 B1
6298672 Valicoff, Jr. Oct 2001 B1
6302714 Bolognia et al. Oct 2001 B1
6304839 Ho et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307386 Fowler et al. Oct 2001 B1
6327150 Levy et al. Dec 2001 B1
6330154 Fryers et al. Dec 2001 B1
6351379 Cheng Feb 2002 B1
6354792 Kobayashi et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356409 Price et al. Mar 2002 B1
6356415 Kabasawa Mar 2002 B1
6384995 Smith May 2002 B1
6388437 Wolski et al. May 2002 B1
6388875 Chen May 2002 B1
6388878 Chang May 2002 B1
6389225 Malinoski et al. May 2002 B1
6411584 Davis et al. Jun 2002 B2
6421236 Montoya et al. Jul 2002 B1
6434000 Pandolfi Aug 2002 B1
6434498 Ulrich et al. Aug 2002 B1
6434499 Ulrich et al. Aug 2002 B1
6464080 Morris et al. Oct 2002 B1
6467153 Butts et al. Oct 2002 B2
6473297 Behl et al. Oct 2002 B1
6473301 Levy et al. Oct 2002 B1
6476627 Pelissier et al. Nov 2002 B1
6477044 Foley et al. Nov 2002 B2
6477442 Valerino, Sr. Nov 2002 B1
6480380 French et al. Nov 2002 B1
6480382 Cheng Nov 2002 B2
6487071 Tata et al. Nov 2002 B1
6489793 Jones et al. Dec 2002 B2
6494663 Ostwald et al. Dec 2002 B2
6525933 Eland Feb 2003 B2
6526841 Wanek et al. Mar 2003 B1
6535384 Huang Mar 2003 B2
6537013 Emberty et al. Mar 2003 B2
6544309 Hoefer et al. Apr 2003 B1
6546445 Hayes Apr 2003 B1
6553532 Aoki Apr 2003 B1
6560107 Beck et al. May 2003 B1
6565163 Behl et al. May 2003 B2
6566859 Wolski et al. May 2003 B2
6567266 Ives et al. May 2003 B2
6570734 Ostwald et al. May 2003 B2
6577586 Yang et al. Jun 2003 B1
6577687 Hall et al. Jun 2003 B2
6618254 Ives Sep 2003 B2
6626846 Spencer Sep 2003 B2
6628518 Behl et al. Sep 2003 B2
6635115 Fairbairn et al. Oct 2003 B1
6640235 Anderson Oct 2003 B1
6644982 Ondricek et al. Nov 2003 B1
6651192 Viglione et al. Nov 2003 B1
6654240 Tseng et al. Nov 2003 B1
6669431 Falace et al. Dec 2003 B1
6679128 Wanek et al. Jan 2004 B2
6693757 Hayakawa et al. Feb 2004 B2
6741529 Getreuer May 2004 B1
6746648 Mattila et al. Jun 2004 B1
6751093 Hsu et al. Jun 2004 B1
6791785 Messenger et al. Sep 2004 B1
6791799 Fletcher Sep 2004 B2
6798651 Syring et al. Sep 2004 B2
6798972 Ito et al. Sep 2004 B1
6801834 Konshak et al. Oct 2004 B1
6806700 Wanek et al. Oct 2004 B2
6811427 Garrett et al. Nov 2004 B2
6826046 Muncaster et al. Nov 2004 B1
6830372 Liu et al. Dec 2004 B2
6832929 Garrett et al. Dec 2004 B2
6861861 Song et al. Mar 2005 B2
6862173 Konshak et al. Mar 2005 B1
6867939 Katahara et al. Mar 2005 B2
6892328 Klein et al. May 2005 B2
6904479 Hall et al. Jun 2005 B2
6908330 Garrett et al. Jun 2005 B2
6928336 Peshkin et al. Aug 2005 B2
6937432 Sri-Jayantha et al. Aug 2005 B2
6957291 Moon et al. Oct 2005 B2
6965811 Dickey et al. Nov 2005 B2
6974017 Oseguera Dec 2005 B2
6976190 Goldstone Dec 2005 B1
6980381 Gray et al. Dec 2005 B2
6982872 Behl et al. Jan 2006 B2
7006325 Emberty et al. Feb 2006 B2
7039924 Goodman et al. May 2006 B2
7054150 Orriss et al. May 2006 B2
7070323 Wanek et al. Jul 2006 B2
7076391 Pakzad et al. Jul 2006 B1
7077614 Hasper et al. Jul 2006 B1
7088541 Orriss et al. Aug 2006 B2
7092251 Henry Aug 2006 B1
7106582 Albrecht et al. Sep 2006 B2
7123477 Coglitore et al. Oct 2006 B2
7126777 Flechsig et al. Oct 2006 B2
7130138 Lum et al. Oct 2006 B2
7134553 Stephens Nov 2006 B2
7139145 Archibald et al. Nov 2006 B1
7164579 Muncaster et al. Jan 2007 B2
7167360 Inoue et al. Jan 2007 B2
7181458 Higashi Feb 2007 B1
7203021 Ryan et al. Apr 2007 B1
7203060 Kay et al. Apr 2007 B2
7206201 Behl et al. Apr 2007 B2
7216968 Smith et al. May 2007 B2
7219028 Bae et al. May 2007 B2
7219273 Fisher et al. May 2007 B2
7227746 Tanaka et al. Jun 2007 B2
7232101 Wanek et al. Jun 2007 B2
7243043 Shin Jul 2007 B2
7248467 Sri-Jayantha et al. Jul 2007 B2
7259966 Connelly, Jr. et al. Aug 2007 B2
7273344 Ostwald et al. Sep 2007 B2
7280353 Wendel et al. Oct 2007 B2
7289885 Basham et al. Oct 2007 B2
7304855 Milligan et al. Dec 2007 B1
7315447 Inoue et al. Jan 2008 B2
7349205 Hall et al. Mar 2008 B2
7353524 Lin et al. Apr 2008 B1
7385385 Magliocco et al. Jun 2008 B2
7395133 Lowe Jul 2008 B2
7403451 Goodman et al. Jul 2008 B2
7421623 Haugh Sep 2008 B2
7437212 Farchmin et al. Oct 2008 B2
7447011 Wade et al. Nov 2008 B2
7457112 Fukuda et al. Nov 2008 B2
7467024 Flitsch Dec 2008 B2
7476362 Angros Jan 2009 B2
7483269 Marvin, Jr. et al. Jan 2009 B1
7505264 Hall et al. Mar 2009 B2
7554811 Scicluna et al. Jun 2009 B2
7568122 Mechalke et al. Jul 2009 B2
7570455 Deguchi et al. Aug 2009 B2
7573715 Mojaver et al. Aug 2009 B2
7584851 Hong et al. Sep 2009 B2
7612996 Atkins et al. Nov 2009 B2
7625027 Kiaie et al. Dec 2009 B2
7630196 Hall et al. Dec 2009 B2
7643289 Ye et al. Jan 2010 B2
7646596 Ng Jan 2010 B2
7729107 Atkins et al. Jun 2010 B2
20010006453 Glorioso et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010044023 Johnson et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010046118 Yamanashi et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010048590 Behl et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020030981 Sullivan et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020044416 Harmon, III et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020051338 Jiang et al. May 2002 A1
20020071248 Huang et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020079422 Jiang Jun 2002 A1
20020090320 Burow et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020116087 Brown Aug 2002 A1
20020161971 Dimitri et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020172004 Ives et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030035271 Lelong et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030043550 Ives Mar 2003 A1
20030155460 Hiraguchi Aug 2003 A1
20030206397 Allgeyer et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040165489 Goodman et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040230399 Shin Nov 2004 A1
20040236465 Butka et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040264121 Orriss et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050004703 Christie Jan 2005 A1
20050010836 Bae et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050018397 Kay et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050055601 Wilson et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050057849 Twogood et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050069400 Dickey et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050109131 Wanek et al. May 2005 A1
20050116702 Wanek et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050131578 Weaver Jun 2005 A1
20050179457 Min et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050185323 Brace et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050207059 Cochrane Sep 2005 A1
20050219809 Muncaster et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050225338 Sands et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050270737 Wilson et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060010353 Haugh Jan 2006 A1
20060023331 Flechsig et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060028802 Shaw et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060066974 Akamatsu et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060130316 Takase et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060190205 Klein et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060227517 Zayas et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060250766 Blaalid et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060269384 Kiaie et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070034368 Atkins et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070035874 Wendel et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070035875 Hall et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070053154 Fukuda et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070082907 Canada et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070127202 Scicluna et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070127206 Wade et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070195497 Atkins Aug 2007 A1
20070248142 Roundtree et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070253157 Atkins et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070286045 Onagi et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080007865 Orriss et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080030945 Mojaver et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080112075 Farquhar et al. May 2008 A1
20080239564 Farquhar et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080282275 Zaczek et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080282278 Barkley Nov 2008 A1
20090028669 Rebstock Jan 2009 A1
20090082907 Stuvel et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090122443 Farquhar et al. May 2009 A1
20090142169 Garcia et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090153992 Garcia et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090153993 Garcia et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090153994 Merrow Jun 2009 A1
20090175705 Nakao et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090261047 Merrow Oct 2009 A1
20090261228 Merrow Oct 2009 A1
20090261229 Merrow Oct 2009 A1
20090262444 Polyakov et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090262445 Noble et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090262454 Merrow Oct 2009 A1
20090262455 Merrow Oct 2009 A1
20090265032 Toscano et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090265043 Merrow Oct 2009 A1
20090265136 Garcia et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090297328 Slocum, III Dec 2009 A1
20100195236 Merrow et al. Aug 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (196)
Number Date Country
583716 May 1989 AU
1177187 Mar 1998 CN
2341188 Sep 1999 CN
1114109 Jul 2003 CN
1192544 Mar 2005 CN
3786944 Nov 1993 DE
69111634 May 1996 DE
69400145 Oct 1996 DE
19701548 Aug 1997 DE
19804813 Sep 1998 DE
69614460 Jun 2002 DE
69626584 Dec 2003 DE
19861388 Aug 2007 DE
0210497 Jul 1986 EP
0242970 Oct 1987 EP
0 277 634 Aug 1988 EP
0356977 Aug 1989 EP
0442642 Feb 1991 EP
0466073 Jul 1991 EP
0776009 Nov 1991 EP
0582017 Feb 1994 EP
0617570 Sep 1994 EP
0635836 Jan 1995 EP
741508 Nov 1996 EP
0757320 Feb 1997 EP
0757351 Feb 1997 EP
0840476 May 1998 EP
1 045 301 Oct 2000 EP
1209557 May 2002 EP
1422713 May 2004 EP
1234308 May 2006 EP
1760722 Mar 2007 EP
1612798 Nov 2007 EP
2241118 Aug 1991 GB
2276275 Sep 1994 GB
2299436 Oct 1996 GB
2312984 Nov 1997 GB
2328782 Mar 1999 GB
2439844 Jul 2008 GB
61-115279 Jun 1986 JP
62-177621 Aug 1987 JP
62-239394 Oct 1987 JP
62-251915 Nov 1987 JP
63-002160 Jan 1988 JP
63-004483 Jan 1988 JP
63-016482 Jan 1988 JP
63-062057 Mar 1988 JP
63-201946 Aug 1988 JP
63-214972 Sep 1988 JP
63-269376 Nov 1988 JP
63-195697 Dec 1988 JP
64-089034 Apr 1989 JP
2-091565 Mar 1990 JP
2-098197 Apr 1990 JP
2-185784 Jul 1990 JP
2-199690 Aug 1990 JP
2-278375 Nov 1990 JP
2-297770 Dec 1990 JP
3-008086 Jan 1991 JP
3-078160 Apr 1991 JP
3-105704 May 1991 JP
3-207947 Sep 1991 JP
3-210662 Sep 1991 JP
3-212859 Sep 1991 JP
3-214490 Sep 1991 JP
3-240821 Oct 1991 JP
3-295071 Dec 1991 JP
4-017134 Jan 1992 JP
4-143989 May 1992 JP
4-172658 Jun 1992 JP
4-214288 Aug 1992 JP
4-247385 Sep 1992 JP
4-259956 Sep 1992 JP
4-307440 Oct 1992 JP
4-325923 Nov 1992 JP
5-035053 Feb 1993 JP
5-035415 Feb 1993 JP
5-066896 Mar 1993 JP
5-068257 Mar 1993 JP
5-073566 Mar 1993 JP
5-073803 Mar 1993 JP
5-101603 Apr 1993 JP
5-173718 Jul 1993 JP
5-189163 Jul 1993 JP
5-204725 Aug 1993 JP
5-223551 Aug 1993 JP
6-004220 Jan 1994 JP
6-004981 Jan 1994 JP
6-162645 Jun 1994 JP
6-181561 Jun 1994 JP
6-215515 Aug 1994 JP
6-274943 Sep 1994 JP
6-314173 Nov 1994 JP
7-007321 Jan 1995 JP
7-029364 Jan 1995 JP
7-037376 Feb 1995 JP
7-056654 Mar 1995 JP
7-111078 Apr 1995 JP
7-115497 May 1995 JP
7-201082 Aug 1995 JP
7-226023 Aug 1995 JP
7-230669 Aug 1995 JP
7-257525 Oct 1995 JP
1982246 Oct 1995 JP
7-307059 Nov 1995 JP
8007994 Jan 1996 JP
8-030398 Feb 1996 JP
8-030407 Feb 1996 JP
8-079672 Mar 1996 JP
8-106776 Apr 1996 JP
8-110821 Apr 1996 JP
8-167231 Jun 1996 JP
8-212015 Aug 1996 JP
8-244313 Sep 1996 JP
8-263525 Oct 1996 JP
8-263909 Oct 1996 JP
8-297957 Nov 1996 JP
2553315 Nov 1996 JP
9-044445 Feb 1997 JP
9-064571 Mar 1997 JP
9-082081 Mar 1997 JP
2635127 Jul 1997 JP
9-306094 Nov 1997 JP
9-319466 Dec 1997 JP
10-040021 Feb 1998 JP
10-049365 Feb 1998 JP
10-064173 Mar 1998 JP
10-098521 Apr 1998 JP
2771297 Jul 1998 JP
10-275137 Oct 1998 JP
10-281799 Oct 1998 JP
10-320128 Dec 1998 JP
10-340139 Dec 1998 JP
2862679 Mar 1999 JP
11-134852 May 1999 JP
11-139839 May 1999 JP
2906930 Jun 1999 JP
11-203201 Jul 1999 JP
11-213182 Aug 1999 JP
11-327800 Nov 1999 JP
11-353128 Dec 1999 JP
11-353129 Dec 1999 JP
2000-056935 Feb 2000 JP
2000-066845 Mar 2000 JP
2000-112831 Apr 2000 JP
2000-113563 Apr 2000 JP
2000-114759 Apr 2000 JP
2000-125290 Apr 2000 JP
3052183 Apr 2000 JP
2000-132704 May 2000 JP
2000-149431 May 2000 JP
2000-228686 Aug 2000 JP
2000-235762 Aug 2000 JP
2000-236188 Aug 2000 JP
2000-242598 Sep 2000 JP
2000-278647 Oct 2000 JP
3097994 Oct 2000 JP
2000-305860 Nov 2000 JP
2001-005501 Jan 2001 JP
2001-023270 Jan 2001 JP
2001-100925 Apr 2001 JP
2002-42446 Feb 2002 JP
2007-87498 Apr 2007 JP
2007-188615 Jul 2007 JP
2007-220184 Aug 2007 JP
2007-293936 Nov 2007 JP
2007-305206 Nov 2007 JP
2007-305290 Nov 2007 JP
2007-328761 Dec 2007 JP
2008-503824 Feb 2008 JP
10-1998-0035445 Aug 1998 KR
10-0176527 Nov 1998 KR
10-0214308 Aug 1999 KR
10-0403039 Oct 2003 KR
45223 Jan 1998 SG
387574 Apr 2000 TW
WO 8901682 Aug 1988 WO
WO 9706532 Feb 1997 WO
WO 0049487 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0067253 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0109627 Feb 2001 WO
WO 0141148 Jun 2001 WO
WO 03013783 Feb 2003 WO
WO 03021597 Mar 2003 WO
WO 03021598 Mar 2003 WO
WO 03067385 Aug 2003 WO
WO 2004006260 Jan 2004 WO
WO 2004114286 Dec 2004 WO
WO 2005024830 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005024831 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005109131 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2006030185 Mar 2006 WO
WO 2006048611 May 2006 WO
WO 2006100441 Sep 2006 WO
WO 2006100445 Sep 2006 WO
WO 2007031729 Mar 2007 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (106)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion of International Application No. PCT/US2011/046919, dated Feb. 24, 2012.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued Mar. 14, 2013 in International application No. PCT/US2011/046919, 5 pgs.
Abraham et al., “Thermal Proximity Imaging of Hard-Disk Substrates”, IEEE Transactions on Mathematics 36:3997-4004, Nov. 2000.
Abramovitch, “Rejecting Rotational Disturbances on Small Disk Drives Using Rotational Accelerometers”, Proceedings of the 1996 IFAC World Congress in San Francisco, CA, Jul. 1996 http://dabramovitch.com/pubs/amrfac—matj.pdf.
Ali et al., “Modeling and Simulation of Hard Disk Drive Final Assembly Using a HDD Template” Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE pp. 1641-1650, 2007 http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1351837.
Anderson et al., “Clinical chemistry: concepts and applications”, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., pp. 131-132, 2003.
Anderson et al., “High Reliability Variable Load Time Controllable Vibration Free Thermal Processing Environment”, Delphion, hhtps://www.delphion.com/tdbs/tdb?order=93A+63418, 3 pages, Mar. 18, 2009.
Asbrand, “Engineers at One Company Share the Pride and the Profits of Successful Product Design”, Professional Issues, 4 pages, 1987.
Bair et al., “Measurements of Asperity Temperatures of a Read/Write Head Slider Bearing in Hard Magnetic Recording Disks”, Journal of Tribology 113:547-554, Jul. 1991.
Bakken et al., “Low Cost, Rack Mounted, Direct Access Disk Storage Device”, www.ip.com, 4 pages, Mar. 3, 2005.
Biber et al., “Disk Drive Drawer Thermal Management”, Advances in Electronic Packaging vol. 1:43-46, 1995.
Christensen, “How Can Great firms Fail? Insights from the hard Disk Drive Industry”, Harvard Business School Press, pp. 1-26, 2006.
Chung et al., “Vibration Absorber for Reduction of the In-plane Vibration in an Optical Disk Drive”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Vo. 48, May 2004.
Curtis et al., “InPhase Professional Archive Drive Architecture” Dec. 17, 2007 http://www.science.edu/TechoftheYear/Nominees/InPhase/Holographic%20Storage.pdf.
Findeis et al., “Vibration Isolation Techniques Sutiable for Portable Electronic Speckle Pattern Interferometry”, Proc. SPIE vol. 4704, pp. 159-167, 2002 http://www.ndt.uct.ac.za/Papers/spiendt2002.pdf.
FlexStar Technology, 30E/Cascade Users Manual, Doc #98-36387-00 Rev. 1.8, pp. 1-33, Jun. 1, 2004.
FlexStar Technology, “A World of Storage Testing Solutions,” http://www.flexstar.com, 1 page (1999).
FlexStar Technology, “Environment Chamber Products,” http://www.flexstar.com, 1 page (1999).
FlexStar Technology, “FlexStar's Family of Products,” http://www.flexstar.com, 1 page (1999).
Frankovich, “The Basics of Vibration Isolation Using Elastomeric Materials”, EARSC, 2005 http://www.isoloss.com/pdfs/engineering/BasicsofVibrationIsolation.pdf.
Grochowski et al., “Future Trends in Hard Disk Drives” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 1850-1854, May 1996 http://svn.tribler.org/abc/branches/leo/dataset/preferences/johan/johan-68.pdf.
Gurumurthi et al., “Disk Drive Roadmap from the Thermal Perspective: A Case for Dynamic Thermal Management”, International Symposium on Computer Architecture, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 38-49, 2005 http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1069807.1069975.
Gurumurthi, “The Need for temperature-Aware Storage Systems”, The Tenth Intersociety conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronics, ITHERM pp. 387-394, 2006.
Gurumurthi et al., “Thermal Issues in Disk Drive Design: Challenges and Possible Solutions”, ACM Transactions on Storage 2:41-73, Feb. 2006.
Haddad et al., “A new Mounting Adapter For Computer Peripherals with Improved Reliability, Thermal Distribution, Low Noise and Vibration Reduction”, ISPS, Advances in Information Storage and Processing Systems, 1:97-108, 1995.
Henderson, “HAD High Aerial Densities Require Solid Test Fixtures”, Flexstar Technology, Feb. 26, 2007.
HighBeam Research website “ACT debuts six-zone catalytic gas heater. (American Catalytic Technologies offers new heaters)” www.highbeam.com, 4 pages, 1998.
HighBeam Research website “Asynchronous Testing Increases Throughput.” www.highbeam.com, 7 pages, 2000.
HighBeam Research website “Credence announces Production Release of the EPRO AQ Series for Integrated Test and Back-end Processing.” www.highbeam.com, 4 pages, 1995.
HighBeam Research website “Test Multiple Parts At Once for Air Leaks. (Brief Article)”, www.highbeam.com, 1 page, 1999.
Iwamiya, “Hard Drive Cooling Using a Thermoelectric Cooler”, EEP-vol. 19-2, Advances in Electronic Packaging, vol. 2:2203-2208, ASME 1997.
Johnson et al., “Performance Measurements of Tertiary Storage Devices”, Proceedings of the 24th VLDB Conference, New York, pp. 50-61, 1998.
Ku, “Investigation of Hydrodynamic Bearing Friction in Data Storage information System Spindle Motors”, ISPSVol. 1, Advances in Information Storage and Processing Systems, pp. 159-165, ASME 1995.
Lindner, “Disk drive mounting”, IBM Technical Disclosure Brochure, vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 903-904, Aug. 1973.
McAuley, “Recursive Time Trapping for Synchronization of Product and CHAMBER Profiles for Stress Test”, Delphion, www.delphion.com/tdbs/tdb?order=88A+60957, 3 pages, Mar. 18, 2009.
Morgenstern, Micropolis Drives Target High-end Apps; Technology Provides Higher Uninterrupted Data Transfer. (Applications; Microdisk AV LS 3020 and 1050AV and 1760AV LT Stackable Hard Drive Systems) (Product Announcement) MacWeek, vol. 8, No. 6, p. 8; Feb. 7, 1994.
Morris, “Zero Cost Power and Cooling Monitor System”, www.delphion.com/tdbs/tdb?order=94A+61950, 3 pages, Jan. 15, 2008.
Nagarajan, “Survey of Cleaning and cleanliness Measurement in Disk Drive Manufacture”, North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Feb. 1997.
Notification of Transmittal of The International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, PCT/US2008/086181, 15 pages, Mar. 16, 2009.
Park, “Vibration and Noise Reduction of an Optical Disk Drive by Using a Vibration Absorber Methods and Apparatus for Securing Disk Drives in a Disk”, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, vol. 48, Nov. 2002.
Prater et al., “Thermal and Heat-Flow Aspects of Actuators for Hard Disk Drives”, InterSociety Conference on Thermal Phenomena, pp. 261-268, 1994.
Ruwart et al., “Performance Impact of External Vibration on Consumer-grade and enterprise-class Disk Drives”, Proceedings of the 22nd IEEE/13th Goddard Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies, 2005.
Seagate Product Marketing, “Seagate's Advanced Multidrive System (SAMS) Rotational Vibration Feature”, Publication TP-229D, Feb. 2000.
Schroeder et al., “Disk Failures in the Real World: What does an MTTP of 1,000,000 hours mean to you?”, In FAST'07: 5th USENIX Conference on File and Storage Technologies, San Jose, CA, Feb. 14-16, 2007.
Schulze et al., “How Reliable is a Raid?,” COMPCON Spring apos; 89. Thirty-Fouth IEEE Computer Society International Conference: Intellectual Leverage, Digest of papers; pp. 118-123, Feb. 27-Mar. 3, 1989.
Terwiesch et al., “An Exploratory Study of International Product Transfer and Production Ramp-Up in the Data Storage Industry”, The Information Storage Industry Center, University of California, www-irps.ucsd.edu/˜sloan/, pp. 1-31, 1999.
Tzeng, “Dynamic Torque Characteriestics of Disk-Drive Spindle Bearings”, ISPS-vol. 1, Advances in Information Storage and Processing Systems, pp. 57-63, ASME 1995.
Tzeng, “Measurements of Transient Thermal Strains in a Disk-Drive Actuator”, InterSociety conference on Thermal Phenomena, pp. 269-274, 1994.
Wilson-7000 disk Drive Analyzer Product Literature, date accessed Jan. 28, 2009, 2 pages.
Winchester, “Automation Specialists Use Machine Vision as a System Development Tool”, IEE Computing & Control Engineering, Jun./Jul. 2003.
Xyratex website “Storage Infrastructure” www.xyratex.com/Products/storage-infrastructure/default.aspx 1995-2008.
Xyratex website “Production Test Systems” www.xyratex.com/Products/production-test-systems/default.aspx 1995-2008.
Xyratex website “Single cell—Production Test Systems” www.xyratex.com/products/production-test-system/single-cell.aspx 1995-2008.
Xyratex website “Continuous Innovation—Production Test Systems” www.xyratex.com/products/production-test-systems/continuous-innovation.aspx 1995-2008.
Xyratex website “Key Advantages—Production Test Systems” www.xyratex.com/products/production-test-systems/advantages.aspx 1995-2008.
Xyratex website “Testing Drives Colder—Production Test Systems” www.xyratex.com/products/productino-test-systems/colder.aspx 1995-2008.
“Xyratex to Debut its New Automated Test Solution for 2.5-Inch Disk Drives at DISKCON USA 2004” 2004 PR Newswire Europe www.prnewswire.co.uk/cgi/news/release?id=130103.
“Automated Production Test Solutions”, Xyratex Product Test brochure, 2006.
Xyratex “Process Challenges in the Hard Drive Industry” slide presentation, 2006 Asian Diskcon.
Suwa et al., “Evaluation System for Residual Vibration from HDD Mounting Mechanism” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 868-873, Mar. 1999.
Suwa et al., “Rotational Vibration Suppressor” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin Oct. 1991.
Yee Leong Low et al., “Thermal network model for temperature prediction in hard disk drive” Journal Microsystem Technologies, vol. 15, No. 10-11, pp. 1653-1656, Oct. 2009 http://www.springerlink.com/content/20668jn67pk426r5/.
Annex to Form PCT/ASA/206 Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search, for International Application No. PCT/US2008/086814, dated Apr. 3, 2009, 5 pages.
Annex to Form PCT/ASA/206 Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search, for International Application No. PCT/US2008/086809, dated Apr. 3, 2009, 1 page.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/039926, Sep. 1, 2009, 13 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/039591, Aug. 31, 2009, 10 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2008/086814, Sep. 18, 2009, 17 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/039888, Sep. 28, 2009, 13 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/039921, Sep. 25, 2009, 14 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040058, Sep. 29, 2009, 13 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040829, Oct. 28, 2009, 13 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/039590, Oct. 30, 2009, 10 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040835, Oct. 30, 2009, 13 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040757, Nov. 24, 2009, 12 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/039898, Nov. 24, 2009, 12 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040795, Nov. 26, 2009, 13 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/045583, Nov. 27, 2009, 13 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040888, Dec. 29, 2009, 14 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040894, Dec. 22, 2009, 12 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/039934, Dec. 23, 2009, 12 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040965, Dec. 23, 2009, 12 pages.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/US2009/040973, Jan. 11, 2010, 13 pages.
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Transferring Disk Drives Within Disk Drive Testing Systems”, inventors: Polyakov et al, and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,150. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,536. Revised as of May 27, 2010.
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Transferring Storage Devices Within Storage Device Testing Systems”, inventors: John P. Toscano et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,201. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/424,980. Revised as of Jan. 4, 2010.
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Processing Storage Devices”, inventors: Richard W. Slocum III., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,619. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/474,388. Revised as of Jan. 5, 2009.
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Bulk Feeding Disk Drives To Disk Drive Testing Systems”, inventors: Noble et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/726,856. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,869. Revised as of Jan. 15, 2010.
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Dependent Temperature Control Within Disk Drive Testing Systems”, inventors: Merrow et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,207. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,069. Revised as of Jan. 13, 2010.
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Test Slot Cooling System for a Storage Device Testing System”, inventors: Merrow et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/727,700. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,567. Revised as of Jan. 13, 2010.
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Storage Device Testing System Cooling”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/775,560. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/698,575. Revised as of Feb. 17, 2010.
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Conductive Heating”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/760,164. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,593. Revised as of Jan. 6, 2010.
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Storage Device Temperature Sensing”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/760,305. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/503,687. Revised as of Jan. 7, 2010.
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Solid State Temperature Control of Hard Drive Tester”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/856,056. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,103. Revised as of Jan. 14, 2010.
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Vibration Isolation Within Disk Drive Testing Systems”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/767,142. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,105. Revised as of Jan. 12, 2010.
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Disk Drive Clamping Transport and Testing”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/766,680. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 11/959,133. Revised as of Jan. 14, 2010.
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Chilled Water Temp Control of Disk Drive Tester”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/766,680. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,061. Revised as of Feb. 18, 2010.
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Vibration Isolation Within Disk Drive Testing Systems,” inventors: Brian S. Merrow and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/767,142. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 12/105,105. Revised as of Mar. 30, 2010.
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Disk Drive Clamping Transport and Testing,” inventors: Brian S. Merrow et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/767,113. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 11/959,133. Revised as of Apr. 4, 2010.
Cardinal Intellectual Property's search report including the results of a search for the features of the claims included in the U.S. patent application entitled “Disk Drive Clamping Transport and Testing,”, inventors: Brian S. Merrow et al., and having assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/766,680. The foregoing U.S. patent application is a continuation of U.S. Appl. No. 11/959,133. Revised as of Apr. 1, 2010.
Exhibit 1 in Xyratex Technology, Ltd. v. Teradyne, Inc.; Newspaper picture that displays the CSO tester; 1990.
Exhibit 2 in Xyratex Technology, Ltd. v. Teradyne, Inc.; Photos of the CSO tester obtained from Hitachi; 1990.
Exhibit 1326 in Xyratex Technology, Ltd. v. Teradyne, Inc.; Image of the back of Exhibit 1 and Exhibit 2 photos, which display the photos' dates; 1990.
Exhibit 1314 in Xyratex Technology, Ltd. V. Teradyne, Inc.; Case, “Last products of Disk-File Development at Hursley and Millbrook,” IBM, Oct. 12, 1990.
Exhibit 1315 in Xyratex Technology, Ltd. V. Teradyne, Inc.; Case, “History of Disk-File Development at Hursley and Millbrook,” IBM, Oct. 17, 1990.
Xyratex Technology, Ltd. V. Teradyne, Inc., Teradyne, Inc's Prior Art Notice Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. Section 282. Case No. CV 08-04545 SJO (PLAx), Oct. 16, 2009.
Xyratex Technology, Ltd. V. Teradyne, Inc., Amended Joint Trial Exhibit List of Xyratex and Teradyne. Case No. CV 08-04545 SJO (PLAx), Nov. 12, 2009.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for International Application No. PCT/GB2005/003490, Jan. 26, 2006, 10 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120050903 A1 Mar 2012 US