Engine calibration development process

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6768941
  • Patent Number
    6,768,941
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 7, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 27, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
A system of developing a calibration parameter set for an internal combustion engine includes a host computer having an engine calibration database and a calibration rules check database stored therein, and an engine/calibration development computer separate from the host computer. A first engine calibration parameter set is provided from the engine calibration database of the host computer to the engine/calibration development computer, and therein at least one parameter of the first engine calibration parameter set is modified to form a second engine calibration parameter set. The second engine calibration parameter set or the at least one modified parameter of the first engine calibration parameter set is then provided to the host computer, and therein a calibration rules check of the second engine calibration parameter set or the at least one modified parameter of the first engine calibration parameter set is conducted against the calibration rules check database.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates generally to systems for developing and/or modifying calibration parameter sets for computer controlled internal combustion engines.




BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




It is generally known to electrically control various functions of an internal combustion engine via a suitable processor, computer or controller (hereinafter an “engine control computer”). Conventionally, a number of desired engine performance characteristics and control features are specified, and one or more software algorithms are developed therefrom and formed into an engine calibration parameter set, or engine calibration, and this engine calibration is then downloaded into the engine control computer via a suitable service/recalibration tool. Thereafter, the engine control computer is operable to control operation of the engine according to the engine calibration resident therein.




With conventional service/recalibration tools, the tools themselves are typically programmed on a set of calibration rules that define compatibility of the various engine calibration data components, limits and ranges of the calibration data, and so forth. In order to perform a successful engine calibration, the conventional tools must accordingly include a version of the rules that is compatible with the engine calibration programmed therein. Compatible revisions of both the engine calibration parameter sets and the calibration rules must therefore be maintained and matched for subsequent engine calibration procedures.




The present invention provides for an engine calibration development or modification process wherein a master set of engine calibration rules is maintained in a single database within a host computer. Calibration rules checking procedures throughout an engine calibration development and/or modification process are conducted, when possible, by the host computer according to the master set of engine calibration rules resident therein. Engine calibration development and/or modification is generally conducted with the assistance of an engine/calibration development computer separate from the host computer, and at times when the engine/calibration development computer is not connected with, or linked to, the host computer. Calibration rules checking can alternatively be conducted by the engine/calibration development computer using a local set of engine calibration rules. In accordance with the process, this local set of engine calibration rules resident within the engine/calibration development computer is automatically updated upon establishing or re-establishing a communications path between the host computer and the engine/calibration development computer.




The present invention comprises at least one or more of the following features or combinations thereof. A method of developing a calibration parameter set for an internal combustion engine is provided comprising the steps of providing a first engine calibration parameter set to a calibration development computer, modifying in the calibration development computer at least one parameter of the first engine calibration parameter set to form a second engine calibration parameter set, providing one of the second engine calibration parameter set and the at least one modified parameter of the first engine calibration parameter set to the host computer, and conducting in the host computer a first calibration rules check of the one of the second engine calibration parameter set and the at least one modified parameter of the first engine calibration parameter set against a rules check database resident therein.




A system for developing a calibration parameter set for an internal combustion engine is provided comprising a host computer including a first rules check database resident therein, and a calibration development computer configured to modify at least one parameter of a first engine calibration parameter set to form a second engine calibration parameter set, the calibration development computer configured to thereafter provide one of the second engine calibration data set and the at least one modified parameter of the first engine calibration parameter set to the host computer, the host computer configured to conduct a calibration rules check of the one of the second engine calibration data set and the at least one modified parameter of the first engine calibration parameter set against the first rules check database.




These and other features of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description of the illustrative embodiments.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a block diagram illustration of one embodiment of a hardware system for developing engine calibrations.





FIG. 2

is a block diagram illustrating some of the engine calibration development process steps carried out by each of the hardware components of FIG.


1


.





FIGS. 3A-3C

illustrate a flowchart representing a process for developing an engine calibration using the hardware system of FIG.


1


.











DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS




For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to a number of embodiments illustrated in the drawings and specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended.




Referring now to

FIG. 1

, one illustrative embodiment of a hardware system


10


for developing software calibrations for internal combustion engines is shown. As is known in the art, a software calibration for an internal combustion engine typically includes data identifying desired engine operating characteristics, data identifying engine operating boundaries and thresholds, control routines for electronically controlling various aspects of the engine, and the like. For purposes of this document, a “software calibration for an internal combustion engine” may be referred to as an “engine calibration parameter set” or simply an “engine calibration”, it being understood that all of these bracketed terms are intended to have the same meaning. System


10


includes a host computer


16


configured for communication with an engine/calibration development computer


18


via communications path


20


. In one embodiment, host computer


16


is a mainframe computer resident in, or maintained by, an engine manufacturer. Alternatively, host computer


16


may be any known computer or computer system including at least the basic components and functional capabilities required of computer


16


as will be described hereinafter with respect to FIGS.


2


and


3


A-


3


C. Engine/calibration development computer


18


may be of known construction and capable of communicating with host computer


16


in a manner that will be described in greater detail hereinafter, of executing one or more software algorithms and of storing data in and retrieving data from, for example, a memory unit


68


resident within computer


18


(see FIG.


2


). Examples of known computers suitable for use as engine/calibration development computer


18


include, but are not limited to, a personal computer (PC), a laptop or notebook computer, or the like, although engine/calibration development computer


18


may alternatively be any known computer or computer system including at least the basic components and function capabilities required of computer


18


as will be described in greater detail herein after with respect to FIGS.


2


and


3


A-


3


C. In any case, communications path


20


may be or include any of a hardwired connection, a telephone modem connection, an internet connection (e.g., via the World Wide Web or WWW), an intranet connection (e.g., a restricted access network), or the like. Alternatively, path


20


need not be a direct communication path, but may instead represent an indirect data transfer path, such as via a data storage disk, tape or other known data storage media. In this regard, host computer


16


and engine/calibration development computer


18


may be configured to include suitable data storage/retrieval interfaces, such as for example, floppy memory disk drives, CD ROM drives, or other known data storage/retrieval interfaces.




Engine/calibration development computer


18


is configured to communicate with a service/recalibration tool


24


of known construction via communication path


26


, wherein communication path


26


may be any known parallel or serial communications link, such as for example, a RS232 link, a universal serial bus (USB) link or the like. Alternatively, path


26


may represent a wireless communication path or an indirect data transfer path as described hereinabove with respect to communication path


20


. Service/recalibration tool


24


is, in turn, configured to communicate with an engine control computer


28


via communication path


32


, wherein communication path


32


may be any known parallel or serial communications link. For example, in at least the medium and heavy-duty diesel engine industries, communication link


32


may be a SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) J1939 or J1587 serial data link. Those skilled in the art will recognize that communication path


32


may be implemented as other known communication structures and configured to communicate via other known communication protocols. In any case, engine control computer


28


is configured to control and manage the overall operation of an engine under development


30


, although it is to be understood that the concepts of the present invention may also be applied to other components and control computers under development, such as for example, an electronically-controlled transmission and corresponding transmission control computer, or the like. Service/recalibration tool


24


, communication path


26


and communication path


32


are configured, as is known in the art, as an interface to download engine calibrations, engine calibration modifications and/or other engine control information or data from the engine/calibration development computer


18


to the engine control computer


28


, and to upload performance, diagnostic and other data from engine control computer


28


to the engine/calibration development computer


18


.




Host computer


16


may further be configured to communicate with a service, manufacturing and/or engineering tool


34


of known construction via communication path


36


. In one embodiment, tool


34


may be structurally and functionally identical to service/recalibration tool


24


, in which case communication path


36


may likewise be identical to communication path


26


described hereinabove. Alternatively, tool


34


may represent a conventional manufacturing tool or engineering development tool configured to download or otherwise exchange information with host computer


16


. In any case, tool


34


is, in turn, configured to communicate with an engine control computer


38


of a production or existing engine


40


via communication path


42


, wherein communication path


42


may be identically as described hereinabove with respect to communication path


26


. Service, manufacturing and/or engineering tool


34


, communication path


36


and communication path


42


are configured, as is known in the art, as an interface to download production engine calibrations and/or engine calibration modifications from the host computer


16


to the engine control computer


38


.




Those skilled in the art will recognize that in addition, or alternatively, to being used to develop engine calibration parameter sets for new engines, the hardware system


10


of

FIG. 1

may be used to modify and/or further develop existing engine calibration parameter sets, as will be described in greater detail hereinafter. It will further be recognized that although the host computer


16


is illustrated in

FIG. 1

as being configured to load engine calibration parameter sets into the engine control computers of production or existing engines


40


, and the engine/calibration development computer


18


is illustrated as being configured to load engine calibration parameter sets or modifications thereto into the engine control computers of engines under development


30


, the service tools


24


and


34


are typically functionally identical so that either computer


16


or


18


can be used to perform any of the described downloading or uploading functions.




Referring now to

FIG. 2

, a block diagram is shown illustrating, in part, some of the hardware structures included within each of the hardware components illustrated in FIG.


1


. For example, referring to

FIG. 2

host computer


16


includes a new installation request (NIR) server and database


50


of known construction, and the engine/calibration development computer


18


includes a local NIR database


60


connected in communication with the NIR server and database


50


of the host computer


16


via signal path


20




a


. The NIR server and database


50


of host computer


16


is also connected through process


74


in communication with a memory unit


68


resident within the engine/calibration development computer


18


via signal path


20




d


, wherein memory unit


68


is configured to store therein engine calibration data sets and/or modifications thereto, as well as other data and control algorithms necessary to the overall operation of computer


18


.




Host computer


16


further includes an engine calibration database


52


having one or more “production” engine calibration parameter sets stored therein, wherein “production” engine calibration parameter sets refer to those that have been released for production use. Host computer


16


further includes a rules check database


54


containing a master set of calibration rules relating one or more of the parameters of any one engine calibration to one or more other parameters of that calibration for purposes of compatibility. For example, the requested engine size (e.g., cylinder displacement) must be capable of meeting the requested engine output torque characteristics, and one example engine calibration rule, which is not intended to be limiting in any way of any of the claims appended hereto, may accordingly define ranges of acceptable engine output torque ratings for given engine sizes. Any modifications to the rules check database


54


occurs off-line as part of a rules modification procedure, represented in

FIG. 2

as block


56


outside of host computer


16


, and the frequency of any such rules modification procedures typically occurs asynchronously, although may occur synchronously, with the engine calibration development process of the subject invention. Generally, the rules modification procedure represented by block


56


is a conventional procedure unrelated to, or off-line from, the process of the subject invention that allows for modification of any one or more of the rules resident within the rules check database


54


at any time. In any case, the engine/calibration development computer


18


includes a local rules check database


66


that is connected in communication with the rules check database


54


of the host computer


16


via signal path


20




c


. The local rules check database


66


is identical in structure and function to the rules check database


54


of the host computer


16


, and includes the identical calibration checking rules that are contained within the rules check database


54


as long as communications path


20




c


exists. In cases where the engine/calibration development computer


18


is not connected in communications with the host computer


16


, any modifications to the master rules check database


54


of host computer


16


will not be transferred to the local rules check database


66


of computer


18


until communications path


20




c


is established or re-established. In one embodiment, as will be described in greater detail hereinafter, the host computer


16


is operable to automatically update the local rules check database


66


resident within the engine/calibration development computer


18


with the contents of the rules check database


54


whenever communications path


20




c


is established. The memory unit


68


and local NIR database


60


are also connected, through process step


62


, in communications with the rules check database


54


of the host computer


16


via signal paths


20




b


and


20




e


. It is to be understood that signal paths


20




a


-


20




e


illustrated in

FIG. 2

, comprise the signal path


20


illustrated in

FIG. 1

, and that signal path


20


is broken down into signal paths


20




a


-


20




e


in

FIG. 2

only for ease of illustration and functional description of the subject invention.




Referring now to FIGS.


2


and


3


A-


3


C, a process


100


for developing a new engine calibration parameter set for a new or existing engine


30


will now be described. It will be understood that some of the steps of process


100


may be omitted in cases where an existing engine calibration parameter set is being further developed or modified, and identification of such omitted steps will be included in the following description.

FIG. 2

illustrates some of the engine calibration development process steps carried out by or within, each of the hardware components illustrated in

FIG. 1

, and

FIGS. 3A-3C

illustrate a flowchart representing the overall process


100


for developing a new engine calibration using the hardware system of FIG.


1


. Process


100


will be described with the aid of FIGS.


2


and


3


A-


3


C.




Process


100


allows a user of the engine/calibration development computer


18


(or other suitable computer) to begin developing a new calibration parameter set for a new or existing engine in the form of a new installation request (NIR). Process


100


begins at step


102


where the link


20


between the engine/calibration development computer


18


and the host computer


16


is established so that the NIR user (user of computer


18


) may access the NIR server and database


50


resident in the host computer


16


. As described hereinabove, communication path


20


may be a hardwired or wireless link, or may alternatively be or include an indirect data transfer link. In any case, process


100


advances from step


102


to step


104


where the NIR user provides over the communication link


20


information to the NIR server and database


50


of the host computer


16


relating to the specifications of the new or desired engine installation. Such specifications may include for example, but are not limited to, engine displacement, engine power rating, engine output torque requirements, and the like. Thereafter at step


106


, the NIR server


50


of the host computer


16


is operable to select from any existing engine calibration parameter sets stored in the engine calibration database


52


an appropriate one of such existing engine calibration parameter sets that most closely matches the NIR information entered at step


104


by the NIR user. Information relating to one or more engines that most closely match the NIR information entered by the NIR user, as well as the engine calibration parameter set that most closely matches the NIR information is sent to the local NIR database


60


of the engine/calibration development computer


18


via communications path


20




a.






The initial engine calibration parameter set selected by the NIR server


50


of host computer


16


may range from matching the requested specifications exactly to matching them only slightly. In cases where the initial engine calibration parameter set matches the requested specifications exactly or closely enough to be acceptable to the user of the NIR computer/interface


102


, process


100


may skip steps


108


and


110


and advance directly to step


112


as illustrated by the dashed line connecting blocks


106


and


112


in FIG.


3


A. Conversely, in cases where the initial engine calibration parameter set does not match the required specifications exactly or closely enough to be acceptable to the user, process


100


advances from step


106


to step


108


where the NIR user makes adjustments or modifications to one or more of the requested specifications and/or one or more of the parameters of the initial calibration parameter set. In

FIG. 2

, functional block


62


corresponds to a known process or algorithm that allows the user of the engine/calibration development computer


18


to access the local NIR database


60


and make such adjustments or modifications. Thereafter at step


110


, the engine/calibration development computer


18


, via process block


62


, processes the adjustments or modifications to the initial calibration parameter set made by the NIR user at step


108


, and correspondingly modifies the initial engine calibration parameter set to produce a new prototype engine calibration parameter set (PCAL.).




Following step


110


(or following step


106


in cases where the initial calibration matches the requested specifications exactly or closely enough to be acceptable), process


100


advances to step


112


where the engine/calibration development computer


18


determines via conventional techniques whether it is currently in communications with the host computer


16


; i.e., whether wired or wireless communication path


20


is established between computers


16


and


18


. If so, process


100


advances to step


114


where the engine/calibration development computer


18


is operable to transfer either the modified or adjusted parameters of the initial engine calibration parameter set that were made at step


108


or the entire prototype engine calibration parameter set, PCAL., to the rules check database


54


of host computer


16


via communications path


20




b


, and host computer


16


is then operable to conduct a rules check of either the modified or adjusted parameters of the initial engine calibration that were made at step


108


or the entire PCAL against the master rule set resident in the rules check database


54


. Thereafter at step


116


, the host computer


16


is operable to update the local rules check database


66


resident within the engine/calibration development computer


18


(see

FIG. 2

) via communication path


20




c


with the master calibration rule set or sets resident in the rules check database


54


under certain circumstances. For example, if communication paths


20




b


and


20




c


have recently been established or re-established after some period where engine/calibration development computer


18


was not linked in communication with host computer


16


, it may be possible that an off-line rules modification to the rules check database


54


of host computer


16


was made during this period, and that the local rules check database


66


of the engine/calibration development computer


18


therefore will not include the most recent version of the master calibration rule set or sets. In such cases where communication paths


20




b


and


20




c


are established after some period of not having been established, host computer


16


is accordingly operable at step


116


to update the local rules check database


66


with the current rule set or sets resident in the rules check database


54


of the host computer


16


. As another example, and as was described hereinabove, off-line rules modifications may occur at any time and the frequency of such rules modifications may be asynchronous with process


100


or any of its steps. Thus, in cases where communication paths


20




b


and


20




c


are established and host computer


16


determines that a new modification of the rules check database has recently occurred, host computer


16


is accordingly operable at step


116


to automatically update the local rules check database


66


with the recently modified rule set or sets resident in the rules check database


54


of the host computer


16


. In any case, the host computer


16


is further operable at step


116


to provide the engine/calibration development computer


18


, via communication path


20




c


, with the results of the calibration rules check process.




If, at step


112


, it is determined that the engine/calibration development computer


18


is not in communication with the host computer


16


via communication paths


20




b


and


20




c


, step


112


advances to step


118


where the engine/calibration development computer


18


conducts the rules check of either the modifications or adjustments made to the initial engine calibration parameter set at step


108


or the entire PCAL. against the local rule set or sets resident within block


66


. From either of steps


116


or


118


, process


100


advances to step


120


where it is determined by the decision block


64


of the engine/calibration development computer


18


whether the calibration rules check, conducted at step


114


or at step


118


of either the modified or adjusted parameters of the initial engine calibration parameter set made at step


108


or the entire PCAL., passed or failed. A “pass” means that all parameters of the engine calibration parameter set being tested are within acceptable ranges and compatible with each other, and a “fail” means that one or more of the parameters of the engine calibration parameter set being tested are outside of acceptable ranges and/or are incompatible with one or more of the other parameters of the engine calibration parameter set.




If the engine/calibration development computer


18


determines at step


120


that PCAL. (or alternatively the modifications or adjustments made to the initial engine calibration parameter set made at step


108


) failed the calibration rules check process of either of steps


114


or


118


, process


100


advances to step


122


where the engine/calibration development computer


18


notifies the NIR user, via block


62


, of the rules check failure, and provides the NIR user with information relating to the one or more parameters that failed. Thereafter, process


100


loops back to step


108


where the NIR user may make further adjustments or modifications to or affecting one or more of the parameters of PCAL., and computer


18


is operable thereafter at step


110


to process the information provided by the NIR user at step


108


to produce an updated prototype engine calibration parameter set (PCAL.), and thereafter at steps


112


-


120


to perform another calibration rules check of either the adjustments or modifications to the previous prototype engine calibration parameter set or the new, revised prototype engine calibration parameter set.




Execution of the loop of steps


108


-


120


continues until a version of PCAL. (or the initial calibration parameter set selected by the NIR server


50


) passes the calibration rules check process of steps


112


-


120


. Execution of process


100


then advances from the “pass” branch of step


120


to step


124


where the engine/calibration development computer


18


stores the version of PCAL. that passed the calibration rules check into the local memory


68


. Thereafter, process


100


advances to step


126


of FIG.


3


B.




Referring now to

FIG. 3B

, process


100


continues with step


126


wherein a user of the engine/development computer


18


downloads the version of PCAL. that passed the calibration rules check process of steps


112


-


120


and is stored in local memory


68


, to the service/recalibration tool


24


via communication path


26


. Thereafter at step


128


, the prototype engine calibration parameter set, PCAL., is downloaded from the service/recalibration tool


24


to the engine control computer (ECC)


28


of the engine under development


30


. While the downloading of PCAL. into ECC


28


is illustrated in FIG.


2


and described at steps


126


-


128


of process


100


as being accomplished via service tool


24


, it is contemplated that computer


18


may alternatively be configured to interface directly with ECC


28


, and therefore download PCAL. from memory unit


68


to ECC


28


. Appropriate modifications to steps


126


and


128


of process


100


to accommodate this alternative embodiment must accordingly be made, wherein such modifications represent a mere mechanical step for a skilled artisan.




In any case, process


100


advances from step


128


to step


130


where the engine


30


is operated and one or more engine performance tests (EPT) are conducted to test the performance of PCAL. against established or desired engine performance standards. Various operating parameters of engine


30


are monitored by the engine/calibration development computer


18


during these one or more engine performance tests via conventional means. For example, computer


18


may be configured to monitor suitable operating parameter sensors and/or engine performance messages broadcast over a datalink


35


(e.g., a SAE J1939 or J1587 data link). Additionally or alternatively, engine performance data may be collected by ECC


28


during the operation of engine


30


, and transferred to the memory unit


68


of computer


18


via communications paths


32


and


26


. In any case, the engine/calibration development computer


18


is further operable at step


130


to record resulting engine performance data (EPD). Thereafter at step


132


, EPD are evaluated to determine whether the engine


30


operating under the control of PCAL. passed or failed the one or more engine performance tests, as illustrated by block


72


of FIG.


2


. If, at step


132


, it is determined that the engine


30


operating under the control of PCAL. passed the one or more engine performance tests, process


100


advances to step


148


where PCAL. is uploaded from memory


68


as a final engine calibration (FCAL.) to the NIR server and database


50


of host computer


16


via communication path


20




d.






Conversely, if at step


132


it is determined that the engine


30


operating under the control of PCAL. fails one or more of the one or more engine performance tests, process


100


advances to step


134


where a user of engine/calibration development computer


18


adjusts or modifies one or more parameters of PCAL. to form a modified prototype calibration parameter set (MPCAL.) via functional block


62


of FIG.


2


. Thereafter, a rules check of either the modified parameters of PCAL. that were made at step


134


or the entire MPCAL. itself must be conducted. At step


136


it is determined whether the engine/calibration development computer


18


is currently in communications with the host computer


16


; i.e., via a wired or wireless communication path


20




b


. If so, process


100


advances to step


138


where the engine/calibration development computer


18


is operable to transfer either the modified parameters of PCAL. that were made at step


134


or the entire MPCAL. to host computer


16


, and host computer


16


is then operable to conduct a rules check of either the modified parameters of PCAL. that were made at step


134


or the entire MPCAL. Thereafter at step


140


, the host computer


16


is operable to update a local rules check database


66


resident within the engine/calibration development computer


18


(see

FIG. 2

) via communication path


20




c


with the corresponding rule set or sets resident in the rules check database


54


as described hereinabove with respect to steps


112


-


120


. The host computer


16


is further operable at step


140


to provide the engine/calibration development computer


18


, via communication path


20




c


, with the results of the rules check of MPCAL.




If, at step


136


, it was determined that the engine/calibration development computer


18


was not in communication with the host computer


16


via communication paths


20




b


and


20




c


, step


136


advances to step


142


where the engine/calibration development computer


18


conducts the rules check of MPCAL. against the rule set or sets resident within block


66


. From either of steps


140


or


142


, process


100


advances to step


144


where it is determined whether the calibration rules check, conducted at step


138


or at step


142


of either the modified parameters of PCAL. that were made at step


134


or the entire MPCAL., passed or failed (see also block


64


of FIG.


2


). If the rules check failed, the user of the engine/calibration development computer


18


is notified via functional block


62


of the one or more parameters that failed the rules check, and process


100


loops back to step


134


where the user may make adjustments or modifications to one or more of the parameters of MPCAL. to form an updated MPCAL. The rules check procedure of steps


136


-


142


on the revised or updated MPCAL. is again conducted, and the loop of steps


134


-


144


is continually executed until a version of MPCAL. passes the calibration rules check procedure. In this case, process


100


advances from the “pass” branch of step


144


to step


146


, where the engine/calibration development computer


18


stores the version of MPCAL. that passed the calibration rules check into local memory


68


, and step


146


then loops back to steps


126


and


128


where the version of MPCAL. that passed the calibration rules check process of steps


136


-


142


is downloaded to the engine control computer


28


of engine


30


, and performance testing of engine


30


is conducted under the control of MPCAL. The loop of steps


126


-


146


continue until a version of MPCAL. is developed that passes both the one or more engine performance tests of step


130


and the calibration rules check process of steps


136


-


142


. At this point, process


100


reaches step


148


where, as described hereinabove with respect to PCAL., the version of MPCAL. that passes the one or more engine performance tests and calibration rules check process is uploaded from memory


68


as a final engine calibration (FCAL.) to the NIR server and database


50


of host computer


16


via communication path


20




d


. Thereafter, process


100


advances to step


150


.




Referring now to

FIG. 3C

, process


100


continues with step


150


wherein the NIR server and database


50


of host computer


16


receives the final engine calibration parameter set FCAL. from the engine/calibration development computer


18


. It is contemplated that step


150


may be carried out in any of a number of ways, and examples include, but are not limited to, direct uploading of FCAL. from computer


18


to computer


16


via wired or wireless communications path


20




d


(FIG.


2


), and/or indirectly via a suitable intermediate data storage medium. In any case, process


100


advances from step


150


to step


152


where the host computer


16


is operable to conduct a calibration rules check on FCAL. against the rule set or sets resident in the master rules check database


54


, and thereafter to step


154


where host computer


16


determines whether FCAL. passed or failed the rules check. These steps correspond in

FIG. 2

to the process flow of FCAL. from block


50


to block


54


to block


58


. If, at step


154


, the host computer


16


determines that FCAL. passes the calibration rules check process of step


152


, process


100


advances to step


156


. Otherwise, if host computer


16


determines at step


154


that FCAL. fails the calibration rules check process of step


152


, process


100


loops back to step


134


of

FIG. 3B

where the user of the engine/calibration development computer


18


is notified, via communications path


20




e


and function block


62


, of the one or more parameters of FCAL. that failed the rules check process of step


152


, and the user at step


134


may then make adjustments or modifications to the one or more of the failed parameters of FCAL. to form another updated MPCAL. as described hereinabove. Thereafter, process


100


follows the steps described hereinabove to eventually form another FCAL.




It is to be understood that steps


152


and


154


of

FIG. 3C

are optional, and may be included in cases where FCAL. is formed after conducting the most recent calibration rules check of MPCAL. in the local rules check block


66


of the engine/calibration development computer


18


rather than within the host computer


16


. In such cases, steps


152


and


154


are included to ensure that FCAL. passes the calibration rule set or sets resident within the rules check database


54


of the host computer


16


before it advances further in process


100


. In cases where the most recent calibration rules check of MPCAL., that was transferred to the NIR server and database


50


by computer


18


as the final engine calibration parameter set FCAL., was carried out by the host computer


16


, steps


152


-


154


may be omitted. It may be desirable in some embodiment to include steps


152


and


154


within process


100


to ensure that FCAL. passes the most recent version of the rule set or sets resident within the master rules check database


54


of the host computer


16


.




In any case, process


100


advances from the “pass” branch of step


154


to step


156


where the final engine calibration parameter set, FCAL., is processed to generate a released engine calibration parameter set, RCAL. In one embodiment, step


156


takes place generally within and outside of host computer


16


, and comprises a number of conventional engineering approval steps. Examples of such approval steps may include, but are not limited to, any of generating a product change request (PCR) or product definition request (PDR), routing the PCR or PDR through one or more appropriate approval paths, updating product tracking information, generating an electronic copy of an engineering job release (EJR), routing the EJR through one or more appropriate approval paths, and storing the released calibration parameter set, RCAL., into the engine calibration database


52


of the host computer


16


. Thereafter, RCAL. is available for downloading, and process


100


may advance from step


156


to step


158


where RCAL. may be downloaded, via an appropriate service/recalibration, manufacturing or engineering tool (e.g.,


34


), to and engine control computer (ECC) of one or more new or existing engines.




It is to be understood that all or part of process


100


may be conducted to generate a released engine calibration parameter set, RCAL. For example, as just described, all of the steps of process


100


illustrated in

FIGS. 3A-3C

may be carried out to develop an engine calibration parameter set for a newly developed engine, or to develop a new engine calibration parameter set for an existing engine. Alternatively, steps


102


-


106


of

FIG. 3A

may be replaced by a step of downloading an existing engine calibration parameter set from the engine calibration database


52


of the host computer


16


to the memory unit


68


of the engine/calibration development computer, and then carrying out the remaining steps


108


-


152


of process


100


to modify an existing engine calibration parameter set for a new or existing engine.




While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the foregoing drawings and description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character, it being understood that only illustrative embodiments thereof have been shown and described and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the invention are desired to be protected.



Claims
  • 1. A method of developing a calibration parameter set for an internal combustion engine, the method comprising the steps of:(a) providing a first engine calibration parameter set to a calibration development computer; (b) modifying in said calibration development computer at least one parameter of said first engine calibration parameter set to form a second engine calibration parameter set; (c) providing one of said second engine calibration parameter set and said at least one modified parameter of said first engine calibration parameter set to said host computer; and (d) conducting in said host computer a first calibration rules check of said one of said second engine calibration parameter set and said at least one modified parameter of said first engine calibration parameter set against a rules check database resident therein.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 further including the steps of:(e) executing steps (f)-(h) after executing step (a) and before executing any of steps (b)-(d); (f) downloading said first engine calibration parameter set from said calibration development computer to an engine control computer configured to control operation of the engine; (g) conducting performance testing of the engine operating under control of said first engine calibration parameter set resident in said engine control computer; and (h) executing steps (b)-(d) only if the engine fails said performance testing.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 further including the steps of:(i) executing step (j) after executing step (g) and before executing any of steps (b)-(d); (j) omitting steps (b)-(d) and providing said first engine calibration parameter set resident in said calibration development computer as a final engine calibration parameter set to a temporary database resident in said host computer if the engine passes said performance testing.
  • 4. The method of claim 3 further including the step of conducting in said host computer a second calibration rules check of said final engine calibration parameter set.
  • 5. The method of claim 4 further including the steps of:(k) executing steps (l)-(m) if said final engine calibration parameter set passes said second calibration rules check: (l) releasing said final engine calibration parameter set for production use; and (m) storing said final engine calibration parameter set within said engine calibration database of said host computer as a released engine calibration parameter set.
  • 6. The method of claim 5 further including the step of downloading said released engine calibration parameter set into an engine control computer of a production engine without conducting a further rules check on said released engine calibration parameter set.
  • 7. The method of claim 4 further including the step of notifying said calibration development computer that said final engine calibration parameter set requires modification if said final engine calibration parameter set fails said second calibration rules check.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 further including the steps of:(e) executing steps (f)-(g) only if said one of said second engine calibration parameter set and said at least one modified parameter of said first engine calibration parameter set passes said first calibration rules check; (f) downloading said second engine calibration parameter set from said calibration development computer to an engine control computer configured to control operation of the engine; and (g) conducting performance testing of the engine operating under control of said second engine calibration parameter set resident in said engine control computer.
  • 9. The method of claim 8 further including the steps of:(h) executing steps (i)-(k) if said the engine fails said performance testing: (i) modifying in said calibration development computer at least one parameter of said second engine calibration parameter set to form a third engine calibration parameter set; (j) providing one of said third engine calibration parameter set and said at least one modified parameter of said second engine calibration parameter set to said host computer; and (k) conducting in said host computer a second calibration rules check of said one of said third engine calibration parameter set and said at least one modified parameter of said second engine calibration parameter set against said rules check database resident therein.
  • 10. The method of claim 8 further including the step of providing said second engine calibration parameter set resident in said calibration development computer as a final engine calibration parameter set to a temporary database of said host computer if the engine passes said performance testing.
  • 11. The method of claim 10 further including the step of conducting in said host computer a third calibration rules check of said final engine calibration parameter set.
  • 12. The method of claim 11 further including the steps of:(h) executing steps (i)-(j) if said final engine calibration parameter set passes said third calibration rules check: (i) releasing said final engine calibration parameter set for production use; and (j) storing said final engine calibration parameter set within said engine calibration database of said host computer as a released engine calibration parameter set.
  • 13. The method of claim 12 further including the step of downloading said released engine calibration parameter set into an engine control computer of a production engine without conducting a further rules check on said released engine calibration parameter set.
  • 14. The method of claim 12 further including the step of notifying said calibration development computer that said final engine calibration parameter set requires modification if said final engine calibration parameter set fails said third calibration rules check.
  • 15. The method of claim 1 further including the steps of:(e) executing steps (f)-(h) before executing any of steps (a)-(d); (f) providing to said host computer information relating to a set of desired engine specifications; (g) selecting from an engine calibration database resident in said host computer an initial engine calibration parameter set corresponding to one of a number of engine calibration parameter sets stored therein that most closely matches said set of desired engine specifications; and (h) providing said initial engine calibration parameter set to said calibration development computer as said first engine calibration parameter set.
  • 16. The method of claim 15 further including the steps of:(i) modifying in said calibration development computer at least one parameter of said initial engine calibration parameter set to form a prototype engine calibration parameter set; (j) conducting an initial calibration rules check of said prototype engine calibration parameter set against one of said rules check database and a local rules check database resident within said calibration development computer; and (k) storing said prototype engine calibration parameter set in said calibration development computer as said first engine calibration parameter set if said prototype engine calibration parameter set passes said initial calibration rules check.
  • 17. The method of claim 16 further including the steps of:(l) executing steps (m)-(n) if said prototype engine calibration parameter set fails said initial calibration rules check; (m) modifying in said calibration development computer any one or more parameters of said prototype engine calibration parameter set identified as having failed said initial calibration rules check to form a modified prototype engine calibration parameter set; (n) conducting another calibration rules check of said modified prototype engine calibration parameter set against one of said rules check database and said local rules check database resident within said calibration development computer; and (o) storing said modified prototype engine calibration parameter set in said calibration development computer as said first engine calibration parameter set if said modified prototype engine calibration parameter set passes said another calibration rules check.
  • 18. The method of claim 1 further including the step of executing steps (c) and (d) following execution of steps (a) and (b) only if said calibration development computer is in communication with said host computer, and otherwise conducting in said calibration development computer said first calibration rules check of said one of said second engine calibration parameter set and said at least one modified parameter against a local rules check database resident therein.
  • 19. The method of claim 18 further including the step of updating said local rules check database in said calibration development computer with said rules check database in said host computer upon establishing communications between said calibration development computer and said host computer.
  • 20. A system for developing a calibration parameter set for an internal combustion engine, the system comprising:a host computer including a first rules check database resident therein; and a calibration development computer configured to modify at least one parameter of a first engine calibration parameter set to form a second engine calibration parameter set, said calibration development computer configured to thereafter provide one of said second engine calibration data set and said at least one modified parameter of said first engine calibration parameter set to said host computer, said host computer configured to conduct a calibration rules check of said one of said second engine calibration data set and said at least one modified parameter of said first engine calibration parameter set against said first rules check database.
  • 21. The system of claim 20 wherein said calibration development computer includes a second rules check database resident therein, said calibration development computer configured to provide said one of said second engine calibration data set to said host computer to conduct said calibration rules check only if said calibration development computer is in communication with said host computer, said calibration development computer otherwise conducting said calibration rules check against said second rules check database.
  • 22. The system of claim 21 wherein said host computer is configured to update said second rules check database resident within said calibration development computer with said first rules check database resident within said host computer upon establishing communications with said calibration development computer.
US Referenced Citations (8)
Number Name Date Kind
4271402 Kastura et al. Jun 1981 A
4383441 Willis et al. May 1983 A
5284116 Richeson, Jr. Feb 1994 A
5426585 Stepper et al. Jun 1995 A
5560337 Bolander et al. Oct 1996 A
5602733 Rogers et al. Feb 1997 A
5974350 Davis, Jr. et al. Oct 1999 A
6308697 Surnilla et al. Oct 2001 B1