1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the field of high performance internal combustion engines pertaining to a connecting rod having a Hollow Beam construction providing a lighter and stronger connecting rod beam member, accomplished by originated elliptical type and eccentric circular segmented walled cross-sections.
2. Description of Background Information
Hollow connecting rods have a history dating back to early automotive engines of the 1920's. Particularly, achieving notoriety in high performance engines. In the mid 1960's the Meyer and Drake, “Offy” racing engines were phased out of use at the Indianapolis 500 mile races after over 20 years of reliable winning performance using hollow connecting rods. Since then, numerous patents have been awarded for hollow connecting rod inventions based on improvements to the original and basic features of historically known hollow beam connecting rods. Beam features such as a round hollow tube or having elongated tubular cross-sections and inserts to close the hollow beam cavity remain as the bases utilized for patented improvements.
In the field of hollow connecting rods patents generally are for beam inventions applied to casting processes and not specifically for high performance or racing. Hollow connecting rods having cast cylindrical tubular beam members being disclosed in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,140,869 to Mrdjenovich, et al (1992). This invention, a casting disclosure for an original and improved hollow beam casting is based on known hollow beam elements.
Another invention for making a hollow beam member is based on having very wide spacing of the beam sides by means of longitudinal arc sides being tangent to piston pin bore and crankshaft bores (beam side being spaced each side of each bore). Including long cavity closing inserts extending between the longitudinal arc sides. U.S. Pat. No. 3,482,467 to Volkel (1969), the beam member is described and patented to have the side walls formed as a full arc inner surface “tangent” to bores of the piston pin (first bore) and the crank-shaft journal connection (second bore). This requires that the hollow cross-section major axis width be excessive creating a poor load force beam structure and that cavities be sealed with a very long insert at the crankshaft end that is without support to react high compressive peak forces; as high as 17,000 lbs. during the power stroke. A potential for bearing distress results due to the long unsupported span. The cavity closing insert being thin has potential for deflecting under power force. Deflecting only 0.002 inch will close bearing lubrication clearance, leading to failure. Volkel by patent claiming the inner wall “tangent” to the piston pin bore and outer wall “tangent” to outer wrist-pin boss diameter, and claming wall thickness between inner and outer arcs to be made large as possible at lower end adds wasted mass at the journal area beam sides, the wrong place for strength. Two conditions make Volkel's connecting rod unsuitable for high performance use and different then the present invention. (1) Volkel created a massive lower thick wall, making the rod heavier with mass questionably offset away from the force axis by the pronounced arc inner sidewalls “tangent” to both bores. The “tangent” sidewalls being ether side of the journal bore is alarming because the load force is directed in line with the longitudinal axis is not recognized, Also disturbing is the long sealing insert essentially is without bearing support structure. (2) Very thin wall sections at the wrist-pin boss and sharp corners invite high stress concentration areas. Stress concentrations are areas were stress forces collect due to material shape and mass affecting load path. Generally stress concentrations generate higher stress level values and problem areas. Volkel's invention is an investment casting. In order to be manufactured compromises with strength, mass and configured form were made. Volkel's invention disclosed a very different way to make a hollow beam noticeably different in form function and particularly in claims than the present invention disclosed herein.
Another invention improvement for making a hollow beam is also based on long recognized approaches, that being elongated cross-section, in direction of crankshaft rotation. Disclosed is a method to make the hollow beam cross-section by using formed thin sheet metal to close the hollow beam and cap cavities. U.S. Pat. No. 5,370,093 to Hayes (1994) requires fabrication from costly preformed sheet metal using multiple piece joined assembly. The multiples thin sheet metal walls, welded into an assembly have limited load capacity and stress distribution, not considered appropriate for high performance applications; where high strength alloy steel and forgings are an important requirement. This is another patent noticeably different in form function and particularly in claims than the present invention disclosed herein.
Reviewing the work of Volkel and Hayes and others, they do not address the objectives or distinctly disclose beam member elements and particularly elliptical profile specification of the present invention. This invention improvement discloses means for lowering stress level concentrations and improved force flux flow distribution from wrist-pin boss to crank-shaft boss. Disclosed is a unique minimal cross-sectional beam having elliptical form profiles providing area and mass improving compressive, tensile and eccentric force load capability over previous patented hollow connecting rods reviewed here, in archives and high performance connecting rods being manufactured.
In one form of this invention there is provided a connecting rod for an internal combustion engine including a hollow beam member. The hollow beam connecting rod includes a piston pin bearing boss and crankshaft bearing boss elements. The boss elements are typical for high performance “racing” engine requirements that have configuration eliminating stress concentration, and providing force flux pathways to minimize stress levels and provision for high strength alloy steel, features generally lacking in prior art. The first end of the improved hollow beam member is joined to a high performance piston pin bearing boss element through a first curved region. The second end of the hollow beam member is joined to a high performance crankshaft bearing boss through a second curved region. The primary improvement is a hollow beam member formed by projected elliptical profile cross-sections on projection planes located at the beam member first end and the second end and centered on the longitudinal beam axis. The walls of the hollow beam member are defined preferably by elliptical outer and defined inner cross-section profiles inline, projecting direct “straight” beam walls from the first to the second elliptical cross-section projective plane. Avoiding the tangent beam sidewalls of Volkel. Sidewalls have a minimal required thickness and cross-section length increase in the major axis direction (direction of crankshaft rotation) than in the minor axis direction. Profiles embody a disclosed “ratio” system specifying wall thickness and profile cross-section major and minor axis length. In another form of the ellipse a “prolonged ellipse” also known as a “stretched ellipse” is provided by increasing the eccentricity (length) in the major axis.
In accordance with another form of the invention there is provided a hollow beam member having variant cross-section profiles. The connecting rod includes a piston pin bearing boss and a crankshaft bearing boss as previously described. The cross-section profile of the hollow beam member first end and the second end being convex-segment cross-section profiles. Disclosed as a closed plane of curved segments (fixed radius arc segments) joined, intersecting as disclosed herein. The hollow beam member walls are thicker and beam length longer in the major axis direction (in plane of crankshaft rotation) than in the minor axis direction. A ratio system specifies profiles wall thickness and beam width. In another form of the convex profile a “prolonged convex profile” is provided, also known as a “stretched convex profile” provided by increasing the eccentricity (length) in the major axis. In accordance with another form of this invention there is provided a hollow beam member cross-section profile first end and the second end outer profile being elliptical or convex cross-section profiles. The inner profile embodies a circular fixed radius arc bore.
The present invention provides a connecting rod comprising a hollow beam member of near minimum cross-section area and mass achievable. It is preferred that this is accomplished by precise beam wall cross-sections having elliptical or convex segment cross-section profile formation configured to a beam member column structure, having specific profile sidewall thickness and width ratios. The disclosed beam column form directs compressive and tensile forces centered about the longitudinal axis of load force path from piston pin to crankshaft journal, improving and “keeping the load path inline” and in-close proximity to the longitudinal axis. Thus efficiently distributing stress concentration throughout the connecting rod beam member. The embodiment potential is elimination or minimizing stress concentrations thus lowering high peak stress levels. Resulting in reliable performance at high engine RPM (Revolutions Per Minute) and improved fatigue life. This is important over prior art because weight reduction reduces mass inertia forces further lowering stress levels. Placement of beam defining cross-sections and section profile are defined with a ratio method to facilitate design and analysis of hollow beam connecting rod manufacturing. Materials, especially high strength alloy steel and forgings (180,000 to 220,000 psi) are “required” for the high performance engine connecting rod embodiments of the present invention. This requirement is not provided by noted prior art; being casting and sheet stock construction.
The primary objective of providing lower stress levels and lower reciprocating weight is to reduce inertia forces. Inertia forces affect engine performance and increase stress in connecting rods. Hollow rod beam weight reductions of 45 to 60 grams over competing solid beam connecting rods have occurred in designs disclosed herein. Reduction of 45 grams of reciprocating weight will reduce peak inertia force by about 400 pounds at peak RPM, determined in studies. Performance is improved by increasing compressive force by 400 pounds on the piston during the power stroke. This is possible because inertia force (400 lbs.) must be overcome during the early part of power stroke by combustion pressure to push the piston during the power stroke. Thus imparting 400 lbs. gain in force to crankshaft rotation, a performance gain provided over prior art.
Another objective is to provide an aerodynamic shape to reduce effects of rod contact with the ambient oil particle environment and air occurring within an engine at high RPM.
An improvement shown in one embodiment of this invention is a new connecting rod beam member cross-section being an ellipse form. The objective being accomplished by varying cross-section profile shape and directional dimensions to meet requirements of stress analysis facilitated by embodiment of a ratio system specifying beam wall thickness and beam section cross-section major axis length. The process provides cross-section being elliptical profiles and geometric convex-segment profiles on finite projection planes to form and project precise beam member column form.
An improvement of one embodiment of this invention is having a procedural embodiment to define and locate profile cross-section forms on projection planes centered on the beam longitudinal axis to project the connecting rod beam member surface form. A further purpose is to reduce the number of elements required to define a connecting rod beam to a few cross-section profiles, preferably two profiles placed on the beam longitudinal axis. The beam form disclosed using projection planes particularly facilitates connecting rod design using computer programs. This objective simplifies and facilitates accurate and analyzed connecting rod design. Computer programs which may be used are Computer Aided Design (CAD), Finite Element Analysis (FEA) and Computer Numerical Controlled (CNC) machining. Another advantage of the improvements disclosed and claimed herein is facilitated design and files computer generated and transferred by electronic means such as E-mail directly to CNC manufacturing machines and facilities.
An advantage of this invention is the embodiments are applicable for casting manufacturing processes for conventional connecting rods using the teachings of the present invention. Beam member wall thickness and dimensions being adjusted for casting material strength being the change.
An improvement shown in one embodiment of this invention is having a reliable connecting rod oil transfer tube from the crankshaft region to the piston pin bore. Beam movement and deflections would stress a rigidly fixed oil transfer tube installation of prior art. The oil tube shown provides a transfer tube that is compliant to bending, flexing, and to the tensile or compressive dynamic engine forces. The oil tube compliance is accomplished by an improved beam cavity sealing closure tapered plug that provides a recess accommodating O-Ring seals. The tube is sealed from leakage and remains compliant to movement forces at the O-ring connection. The upper end, being secured fixed to the piston pin boss. The tube is an optional provision and is not required or used in all applications.
An improvement of one embodiment of this invention is a new application to provide a connecting rod bearing cap alignment embodiment to provide a more rigid alignment connection. This may be accomplished by machined sleeves, circular extending above the connecting rod cap surface and extending around the cap connection bolts. The sleeves register into mating bored recesses in the rod journal connection providing an accurate fitting cap to rod assembly. Previous sleeves in common use being separate elements pressed into the bearing cap, resulting in the cap being bored for sleeve installation weakening the structure and being compliant, not a rigid connection.
Other objectives and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following descriptions, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein, by way of illustration and example, an embodiment of the present invention is disclosed.
The drawings constitute a part of this specification and include the embodiment of this invention.
RATIO TABLE 1: “Ratios for wall thickness and profile length at second cross-section, major axis”.
A general portrayal of disclosed hollow connecting rod embodiments being presented that are applicable to FIG'S. 1, 6, 10 and 13. With reference to
Beam member 11 column Inner structure description being presented, with reference to
Inner beam elements at crankshaft connection being continued. Referring to
Prior to continuing with profile description, the tensile and compressive force conditions improved by the hollow beam connecting rod beam structure is described. Referring to
Continuing disclosure of elliptical cross-section profile embodiment for beam member 11 being presented. The profile development means defining profiles and alignment that follows is applicable to other beam member 11 embodiments disclosed herein. Cut-lines 4-4 and 5-5 therein indicating cross-section locations. Illustrated in
First cross-section profile 51 and second cross-section profile 52 formations being disclosed. Returning to
Continuing now with the second cross-section profile 52, referring to
Embodiment to establish cross-section profile sidewall 50 thickness and beam X-X and Y-Y length being provided by means of “ratios” that optimize efficient beam member 11 column structure for close inline support of noted direct acting force vector FV, tensile force T and compressive force C. A convenient control system employing a first “ratio” multiple of first ellipse cross-section profile 51 sidewall thickness 39 and 40 defining second profile 52 sidewall thickness 46 and 47. And, a second “ratio” multiple of first ellipse 51 major and minor axis length defining second profile 52 major and minor axis length. Ratios are derived from analysis of connecting rod designs conforming to the present invention embodiments.
Ratio application method disclosed as follows is applicable to beam member 11 of FIG'S. 1, 6, 10 and 13. The ratio application is illustrated in FIG'S. 4 and 5. Wherein the second cross-section profile 52, profile major axis thickness 47 is derived by multiplying first cross-section profile 51, sidewall thickness 40 by a first ratio range of 1.00 (being a ratio of 1 to 1) to 5.00 (being a ratio of 5 to 1). And, second cross-section profile 52, major axis length derived by multiplying cross-section profile 51 major axis length by a second ratio range of 1.00 (being a ratio of 1 to 1) to 1.50 (being a ratio of 1.50 to 1). Preferably the ratios for profile sidewall thickness 39 and 46 and length of cross-section profiles 51 and 52 is 1 to 1 in the minor axis, as illustrated, to accommodate design and manufacturing simplicity. Referring to Table 1, “Ratios for wall thickness and profile length at second cross-section, major axis” provides ratio application instruction to the preferred second cross-section major axis profile dimension requirements. And, is applicable to all hollow connecting rod beam member 11 herein. The minor axis profile thickness and length has a preferred ratio of 1 to 1.
Continuing with disclosure of the elliptical form profile embodiment. The descriptive ellipse example disclosed herein being determined using the mathematical “Equation of the Ellipse”, as used in Analytical Geometry. Variations of the ellipse equation may be used to alter the radius of curvature and the cross-section elliptical profile to distribute mass to optimize the beam member stress levels and load efficiency. By example,
Formulas for ellipses may be found in mechanical engineering handbooks. Mechanical Engineers' Handbook by Lionel S. Marks in general use provides formulas to develop various elliptical constructions applicable to this invention. The preferred method for ellipse form cross-sections development is the use of Computer Aided Design, CAD programs, creating an ellipse having the “Equation of the Ellipse” is simplified using CAD programs. These programs require input of only the major axis and the minor axis length dimensions. The program “Ellipse Icon” draw command then automatically constructs the ellipse effortlessly using “Equation of the Ellipse” as illustrated in
Continuing with disclosure of the cross-section profile embodiment improvement by a “second means” of construction for beam member 11. A preferred method improves the elliptical profile strength in the X-X direction by a slight profile distance length increase of mass placement at the major axis end; “stretching the X-X profile slightly for certain preferred applications.
Continuing with
Continuing with FIG'S. 10, 11 and 12 disclosing “third means” construction for beam member 11 having a first “convex-segment” profile 59 and second prolonged convex-segment second profile 63 embodying axis alignment convention disclosed by
Continuing with
Referring to
Continuing with
Continuing at
Referring to
The present invention embodiments consider use of computer programs to facilitate design of connecting rods using Computer Aided Design, CAD, in particular, 3 Dimensional, or 3D CAD programs and Finite Element Analysis, FEA. Connecting Rod cross-sections such as ellipses, elliptical forms can be generated using capabilities of CAD programs to facilitate cross-section profile development to accomplish connecting rod design of the present invention.
The connecting rod of the present invention embodiments having profile form and ratios controlling beam member form is particularly suitable of being manufactured using aluminum connecting rods such as used in drag racing. Applying “ratios” for beam member as disclosed herein and adjusted for material tensile strength and characteristics is required. The herein embodied disclosure being fully applicable to aluminum connecting rods. Investment casting, powder forging or conventional casting procedures are applicable to the disclosed embodiments. As best seen in
The hollow beam connecting rod being a “Closed Beam” hollow column is capable of higher load capacity over conventional “Open Beam” columns. Most conventional high performance connecting rods are H-Beam configuration, having open flanges in direction of crankshaft rotation. Mass is centered on the longitudinal and neutral axis, requiring more mass to accommodate column and bending loads. The H-Beam open flange edges are affected with stress concentrations. The hollow “Closed Beam” embodiment herein places mass a defined distance from the longitudinal and neutral axis, less material is required to accommodate column and bending loads. And, there are no free standing open edges. Reducing beam mass results in less reciprocating mass being accelerated by inertia forces at high engine speeds. The Engineering method used regarding the present invention is a proprietary developed process designed to be simple, being based on experience and assembled study and analysis data. Programs where engine dimensions and data, RPM and component weights are entered determine the force loads acting on the connecting rod and beam as the crankshaft rotates through an engine cycle. Primary forces determined are (1) Tensile loads including peak tensile load. (2) Compressive loads including peak load. (3) Bending force and related angles. A preferred method used to determine the value for noted “ratios” applied to disclosed cross-section profiles is to relate determined cross-section “moments of inertia” and “cross-section area” to a ratio range. Providing the highest moments of inertia in the X-X major axis being the objective for a ratio range.
This is a continuation-in-part of pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/079,150 filed Feb. 20, 2002, titled Engine Connecting Rod for High Performance Applications and Method of Manufacture. The benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/270,279, filed Feb. 22, 2001, is claimed.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60270279 | Feb 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11064588 | Feb 2005 | US |
Child | 12220615 | US | |
Parent | 10079150 | Feb 2002 | US |
Child | 11064588 | US |