This disclosure relates to systems and methods for separating hydrophobic fluids (such as oils) which are entrained as aerosols in gas streams, for example in crankcase ventilation filter gases. Further, the arrangements also provide for filtration of other contaminants such as carbon soot material from the gas streams. The arrangements are typically to used filter crankcase ventilation gases, from engine systems. Methods for conducting the separations are also provided.
Certain gas streams, such as engine blow-by gases (i.e., crankcase ventilation gases, from the crankcases of the diesel engines) carry substantial amounts of entrained oils (liquid) therein, as aerosol. The majority of the oil (liquid) droplets within the aerosol are often within the size of 0.1-5.0 microns. In addition, such gas streams also carry substantial amounts of fine particulate contaminant, such as carbon contaminant (soot).
In some systems, it is desirable to vent such gases to the atmosphere. In general it is preferred that before the gases are vented to the atmosphere, they be cleaned of a substantial portion of aerosol and/or organic particulate contaminate therein.
In other instances, it is desirable to direct the air or gas stream into equipment. Such systems are sometimes references as “closed” crankcase ventilation systems. With such closed systems, it may be desirable to separate aerosolized liquids and/or particulates from the gas stream during circulation, in order to provide such benefits as: reduced negative effects in the downstream equipment; improved efficiencies; recapture of otherwise lost oil; and/or, to address environmental concerns.
Improvements in crankcase ventilation filter systems (i.e., blow-by gas filtration systems) constructed for application with a variety of engine or equipment systems, are generally sought.
According to the present disclosure, crankcase ventilation filter assemblies are described. In addition, components, features and techniques for use in the crankcase ventilation filter assemblies are described. Also methods of assembly and use are described. There is no specific requirement that an assembly, component, feature, technique or method include all of the details described herein, in order to obtain some benefit according to the present disclosure.
According to an aspect of the present disclosure, a crankcase ventilation filter assembly is provided which includes a housing arrangement having a gas flow inlet arrangement, a gas flow outlet arrangement, and a liquid drain outlet arrangement. The system includes, mounted on the housing: a backpressure limiting valve regulation (regulator) arrangement oriented to regulate pressure transfer to, and gas flow through, the housing from, the gas flow inlet arrangement; and, a vacuum limiting regulator valve arrangement also mounted on housing and positioned in a gas flow path downstream of backpressure limiting valve regulator arrangement and upstream of the gas flow outlet arrangement to regulate transfer of vacuum through the housing arrangement via the gas flow outlet arrangement. Two embodiments are depicted with such arrangements. In one, a single cartridge so positioned in the housing; and, in a second, two filter cartridges are depicted in the housing.
Also, according to an aspect of the present disclosure, crankcase ventilation filter assembly is provided comprising a housing arrangement including a gas flow inlet arrangement, a gas flow outlet arrangement, and a liquid drain outlet arrangement. In inertial impaction arrangement is positioned across the gas flow inlet arrangement to advantage. In the example depicted, the gas flow inlet arrangement comprises a flow tube with a closed end positioned inside of the housing, the flow tube including a side gas flow passageway arrangement therethrough (or a open support arrangement) adjacent the closed end. The assembly further includes a filter cartridge comprising media positioned around an open filter interior. The filter cartridge is removably positioned in the housing with a flow tube, having a closed end and the side gas flow passageway arrangement (or open support arrangement) projecting into the open filter interior, i.e. to a location surrounded by media. In examples depicted, the flow tube with closed end projects upwardly into the filter cartridge, although alternatives are possible, including direction downwardly into the filter cartridge.
In one embodiment depicted, a crankcase ventilation filter assembly is characterized, useable for example in a closed crankcase ventilation system to filter crankcase ventilation gases (engine blow-by gases) that includes two serviceable filter cartridges organized in series with respect to gas flow. A first, most upstream, serviceable filter cartridge is configured to coalesce oil and direct the liquid to a first drain arrangement. The second serviceable filter cartridge is configured to also coalesce oil, but to direct it to a second drain arrangement, with a sealing arrangement (and having features) inhibiting liquid flow between the two drain arrangements, within a housing of the assembly. The serviceable filter cartridges are preferably different form one another, with respect to overall media pack content, with the first providing for a substantial amount of soot load or collection, and the second acting more as a polishing or finishing filter. It is expected that with such an arrangement the two serviceable filter cartridges may be provided as separately serviceable because in some applications, the first filter will typically need to be serviced more often than the second in a typical application.
An arrangement in described in which a breather or coalescer, pack is provided upstream of the first serviceable filter cartridge, for an initial collection of oil material in the crankcase ventilation gases.
Regulator valve arrangements are described appropriately placed for desirable effect. A first, referred to as a backpressure limiting regulation valve assembly or by similar terms, is positioned to protect the engine against a under pressure condition being transferred therein. A second, referenced herein as a vacuum limiting regulator valve assembly or by similar terms, is positioned to manage inhibition of an excess vacuum condition being transferred from a gas flow outlet of the assembly through the assembly.
Also, example crankcase ventilation filter cartridges are depicted and described.
Again, there is no specific requirement that a system, arrangement component, assembly or method include all of the features characterized herein, in order to obtain some benefit according to the present disclosure.
A. Typical Engine and Crankcase Ventilation Filter System Arrangement,
In
The particular crankcase ventilation assembly 5 depicted, is a closed crankcase ventilation assembly. Thus, the gas outlet 7 directs the gases back into the engine system 3, for example into a turbo system indicated at 9, via line 9A, or an engine in-take air cleaner assembly indicated at 10, via line 10A, or elsewhere as desired.
It is noted that, in some instances, before entering the crankcase ventilation filter assembly 5, the gases are passed through a “breather” typically comprising a media pack such as a metal foil pack or similar pack, for the oil separation. Such an optional breather assembly is indicated in
A number of issues are presented to the manufacturers of diesel engines.
For example, it is desirable to protect the engine from transfer therein of a vacuum condition, from crankcase ventilation filter assembly 5. It is also desirable to protect the crankcase ventilation filter assembly 5 from transfer from vacuum condition therethrough via the gas flow outlet 7.
Also, there is an increasing need to maintain controls on emissions. To facilitate this, relatively high efficiency of collection and separation within the crankcase ventilation assembly 5 is desired. However, obtaining such efficiency is generally exacerbated by increasing soot levels in the crankcase ventilation system, for example provided in the crankcase ventilation gases of EGR engines (exhaust gas recirculation engines) in which engine exhaust gases are directed into engine components. Relatively high soot levels provide cleaning or filtration issues in the absence of high efficiency separation and can provide undesirable clogging of engine components.
In accord with the present disclosure systems, features, and techniques are provided to enhance crankcase ventilation filter assembly operation.
B. A Schematic Example of a First Improved Crankcase Ventilation Filter Assembly and Method,
In
Still referring to
Referring to
At arrow 33, filtered gas flow from phase 21A to phase 21B is shown. Typically, within phase 21A would be positioned a removable and replaceable filtration cartridge, which serves to collect soot and other material, and which also serves to facilitate coalescing of the oil.
Within phase 21B is positioned a second filter stage. Typically, the second filter stage also comprises a serviceable filter cartridge, comprising material appropriate for further filtration of the gas and includes media appropriate for further coalescing and drainage of oil. At 35, an oil (liquid) drain outlet from a second phase 21B is shown; the oil drainage being indicated by arrow 36. This oil, too, can be directed to an engine sump or crankcase as desired. At 28 a filtered gas flow outlet from phase 21B (and assembly 20) is shown; the filtered gases being indicated leaving the assembly 20 at arrow 39. This would correspond to the gas flow outlet 7,
A typical crankcase ventilation assembly such as assembly 21 may include therein a vent or bypass valve assembly. Such an assembly provides for rapid release of internal pressure within housing 21, should it exceed some desired level. An optional vent or bypass valve arrangement is indicated generally at 40.
Within housing 21, the assembly 20 may include a variety of regulator valves for management of internal operations. For example a backpressure regulation valve assembly can be included in the first phase 21A, to inhibit crankcase pressure from dropping below a selected pressure level. Further, a vacuum limiting regulation valve arrangement may be included in phase 12B, to inhibit equipment to which gas in line 29 is directed, from drawing too rapidly, and causing an undesirable under pressure or vacuum condition within housing 21, which can cause issues with drain height requirements and/or filter life. Regulator valves of this type are described in general terms, in connection with embodiments depicted herein below. As will be apparent from the embodiment described in
In
Referring first to
For the particular example assembly 50 depicted, inlet arrangement 54 is an upwardly directed tube 54a that passes into the housing 51 from underneath. Further, outlet arrangement 55 comprises tube 55a with a section 55b that receives gas flow downwardly out of housing 51, and which includes an elbow 55c which turns the gases and directs them laterally through section 55d. With respect to these features of outlet arrangement 55, attention is directed, for example to
Referring again to
In the example depicted, each of the oil drains 64, 65, includes a turn or elbow 64b, 65b, respectively, underneath regions 64a, 65a, with a lateral extension 64c, 65c. In this manner, the total dimension of the assembly 50, extending downwardly underneath housing 51 is limited. This will typically be preferred, when the assembly 50 is used and positioned as described herein below.
Still referring to
Referring to
It is anticipated that in some systems, a gasket may be provided between the base section arrangement 70 and the access cover arrangement 71, to inhibit undesirable leaking at a joint or seam between these components, in assembly and use. In the cross-sectional view of
In
In
In
In
Referring to
In a typical arrangement, the plate 86 would be spaced from a portion 70c of bottom 70b (immediately adjacent aperture 70a) by support arrangement 87, a distance within the range of 15 mm-30 mm, inclusive, although alternatives are possible. In a typical assembly 50, in which the bottom portion 70 of the housing comprises a molded plastic component, support 85 and plate 86 can be formed integral with the a remainder of the bottom section 70. Also, typically the plate 86 will often have a dimension thereacross (diameter when plate 86 is circular) within the range of 20-50 mm, inclusive, typically 25-40 mm, although alternatives are possible.
The gases are then directed upwardly into a breather or breather chamber 90. The breather or breather chamber 90 is generally a housing 91 containing a high surface area packing 92. Within the chamber 90, a portion of material obtained within the gas flow will collect on the surfaces of the packing and drain downwardly. A typical packing would comprise a mesh of aluminum foil strips, although alternative materials can be used. Typically, the packing within chamber 90 will not ever be removed or replaced, in a normal lifetime of operation.
It is noted that when breather 90 is used, the optional breather 11,
For the particular assembly 50 depicted, breather 90 comprises a cup 93 having a permeable bottom 93a and impermeable sidewall 93b. Cup 93 is a snap-fit to support 85, typically so that is cannot readily be removed. The housing 91 further includes a cover 94 snap-fit to an upper portion 93u of the sidewall 93b, as indicated generally at 93x. The cover 94 is generally open and in the example depicted comprises a plurality of ribs 94a surrounding a center aperture ring 94b. Generally, gases can flow upwardly through cover 94 in any region other than occupied by the ribs 94a, and the surfaces of ring 94b.
The cross-sectional size of chamber 90, relative to the plate 86 is typically a ratio of at least 1.8:1 and usually at least 2:1 and often within the range of 2.2:1 to 2.8:1, inclusive, although alternatives are possible. The vertical dimension of packing 92 is generally at least 45 mm, typically at least 50 mm and often within the range of 55-85 mm, inclusive, although alternatives are possible. A ratio of a vertical height of packing 92, to a horizontal dimension of packing 92, when sidewall 93b is generally cylindrical, would typically be at least 0.5, usually at least 0.8 and sometimes greater than 0.9, for example 1.0 or larger.
Still referring to
In passing to the (first) filter cartridge 95, the gases are generally regulated by a backpressure limiting regulation (regulator) valve arrangement 100, discussed in further detail below. In general, the backpressure limiting regulator valve arrangement 100 is configured to regulate a pressure condition so that a desirable range of pressures is maintained at inlet 54 (and the further upstream engine crankcase). In general, the backpressure limiting regulator valve arrangement is positioned downstream from the gas flow inlet 54 and upstream of the gas flow outlet 28 and a downstream vacuum limiting valve regulation (regulator) arrangement discussed below.
In
Still referring to
The gases from annulus 108 are then directed from the first phase or region 60 into the second phase or region 61.
Still referring to
In a typical operation, gases pass through the media 120 from annulus 124 around the media 120, to the open filter interior 121, with filtering. Oil (liquid) coalesced within the media 120 will drain downwardly into collector 127x by which it can drain eventually outwardly through the second oil drain arrangement 65. Of course, some filtration will occur in addition to the coalescing, and material will remain entrained within the media 120 or will drain with the oil downward. Gases at the open filter interior 121 are generally directed into inlet end 126 of central flow tube 127. The central flow tube 127 is typically impermeable, except for opening at end 126 and at an opposite outlet end. The gases are then directed from the interior 127i of central flow tube 127 to outlet arrangement 55.
Still referring to
In more general terms, the vacuum limiting regulation (regulator) valve arrangement 130 is positioned upstream in a gas flow path of the gas flow outlet arrangement 55 and downstream of the gas flow inlet arrangement 54 (and downstream from backpressure limiting valve regulator arrangement 100) to inhibit an undesirable vacuum from being transferred via outlet 55 through the housing to the backpressure limiting valve arrangement 100. This is discussed further below.
Typically, the cartridge 95 and the cartridge 115 are separately serviceable components, i.e. each is removed and replaced within assembly 50 independently of the other, to advantage. In some applications of the selected ones of the principles according to the present disclosure, the assembly could be configured with a single serviceable component; i.e. with cartridges 95, 115 secured together.
Attention is now directed to
Still referring to
Also referring to
It is noted that in
It is also noted that the vacuum limiting regulation (regulator) valve arrangement 130 is generally configured to have a “normal” open position; i.e. biasing member 133 biases the valve open, when the system is shut-off.
Referring again to
Referring still to
Attention is still directed to
The example biasing member 160 is configured to provide the regulator valve arrangement 100, with a “normal closed” orientation, as shown in
Attention is now directed to
Attention is also directed to
Referring back to
Attention is now directed to
In
In
In
In
In
In
Referring back to
Second end piece 196 for a typical orientation, will be a bottom end piece. At 205 are shown spaces in axial overlap with media 105, adjacent outer perimeter 105p. These spaces 205 allow for direct drainage downwardly of coalesced oil, from media 105. It is also noted that apertures can be positioned in end piece 106 in direct axial overlap with media 105 to facilitate drainage. Typically, any such apertures would be at a downstream of media stage, discussed above, when used. Typically end piece 196 will include the support for a seal. One is shown, for example in
In
The second end piece 231 for the particular cartridge 115 depicted, is generally a bottom end piece in use. Referring to
Referring to
End piece 231 would typically also include a housing seal support thereon, for example as indicated at
Preferably, the two cartridges 95, 115 are configured so that they cannot be interchangeably mounted. That is, each is configured so that it can only be mounted where intended. This can be accommodated for example, by providing different size seals and different direction of seal in at least some instances, on the cartridges. Further, it is noted that support 107 of cartridge 95 generally defines a larger open cross-sectional area, than does support 171 of cartridge 115. Preferably the cross-sectional opening of support 171 is sufficiently large, so that cartridge 115 cannot be slid over breather 90, when present. This too would prevent inadvertent positioning of cartridge 115 other than where intended, during servicing.
It is noted that one or more of the housing seals can be positioned on housing surfaces rather than on cartridges.
In
In
In
In
Still referring to
In some systems, it may be desirable to specifically direct gas outflow from outlet 55,
Some engine families will benefit from using a venturi placed between the air intake filter and the turbo charger in order to boost turbo vacuum to maximize the decrease in pressure differential across the crankcase ventilation filtration system 50. This will be particularly important for engine families that allow very low crankcase pressure, and as such the venturi may be useful to ensure that more turbo charger vacuum is felt on the downstream end of the crankcase ventilation filter assembly 50.
Without a venturi system installed between the air intake filter and the turbo charger, the vacuum generated by the turbo charger will stay at fairly low levels and thus its impact to lower the pressure at the downstream end (outlet end) with the crankcase ventilation filter assembly would be very small. In such instances, the crankcase ventilation filter system may not adequately deliver a desired service interval.
Of course a vacuum limiting regulation (regulator) valve arrangement as previously discussed can be used to inhibit excess vacuum from being transferred to the cartridges 95, 115 during operation. Further, a backpressure limiting regulation (regulator) valve arrangement as previously described can be used to inhibit undesirable transfer of vacuum from outlet 54 to the engine crankcase.
It is noted that the assembly 401 described in communication with
Certain principles applied described herein can be applied in a crankcase ventilation filter system in which there is a provided a single filter cartridge as opposed to multiple cartridges. An example of such an application of principles will be understood by reference to
In particular, in connection with
Referring first to
Attention is now directed to
Attention is now directed to
Referring to
In
In
In
Attention is now directed to
Referring to
Gases entering gas flow inlet 410 are regulated by backpressure limiting regulation (regulator) valve arrangement 415 with respect to gas flow through the housing 402 and into crankcase ventilation filter cartridge 420. For the particular example 401 depicted, the backpressure limiting valve arrangement 415 comprises a diaphragm valve 425 secured in place by cover 426 with regulation being provided by biasing arrangement 427 in the example depicted, comprising spring 427s. To reach interior 402i of housing 402 and in particular to reach annulus 430 around cartridge 420 inlet gas must flow over rim 431 and enter region 432.
In order for the gases to pass over brim 431 and into region 432, valve diaphragm 425 needs to be biased away from 431. This would occur when the biasing pressure of biasing arrangement 427 is overcome by pressure within inlet 410 and the crankcase. It is noted that aperture 433 is provided through cover 426, to allow for ambient pressure on an opposite side of diaphragm 425 from inlet 410 and region 432. Also, the diaphragm 425 can be seen having a rolling hinge 425h secured in place by perimeter bead 425p, secured at 426.
In general terms, as with the previously described embodiment, the backpressure limiting regulation (regulator) valve arrangement 415 has a normal closed position. It will not be open unless the pressure in the crankcase and at inlet 410 is sufficient. This means that an under pressure condition within the housing 402, upstream from the backpressure limiting valve regulation (regulator) valve arrangement 415 cannot be transferred through to the crankcase.
Still referring to
It is noted that for the cartridge 420 depicted, gas flow through the media 440 is from out-to-in during filtering. For this reason, the media 440 is depicted with an upstream soot loading stage 440x positioned surrounding a downstream filtering/coalescing stage 440y. Of course, the media 440 is a matter of choice, and can be selected to have multiple phases or only one phase as desired. In
The filtered gases at the open filter interior 443 are then directed upwardly over rim 445 and into an upper end 446t of gas flow tube 446. The gases can then pass downwardly through tube 446 to gas flow outlet arrangement 411.
Regulation of gas flow over rim 445 is provided by vacuum limiting regulation (regulator) valve arrangement 450. The vacuum limiting regulation (regulator) valve arrangement 450 generally comprises a valve diaphragm 451 secured in place under cover 452 with regulation provided by biasing arrangement 453, in this instance comprising a spring 453s.
Still referring to
In more general terms, and as described for the vacuum limiting regulation (regulator) valve assembly of the embodiment depicted in
Liquid coalesced within media 420 will build-up with a liquid head therein. The lower end piece 442 allows for direct drainage downwardly, through drain apertures 455, eventually liquid drain 412. In addition, any liquid which flows to open filter interior 443 can flow downwardly through central aperture 456 in end piece 442, to drain 412 and outwardly from assembly 401. Drain 412, for example, can be connected to duct work or tubing that directs the liquid to a sump or elsewhere. A valve arrangement can be included in the ducting to control liquid flow downwardly to the sump or elsewhere.
Still referring to
The particular seal member 461 depicted, comprises an o-ring 4610 positioned on an and around a projection 465 on end piece 442. Alternatives are possible, including molded-in-place seals.
It is noted that a variety of housing seal arrangements 460 can be used, the example depicted merely being usable possibility.
The assembly 401 includes a second seal 468 inhibiting gas flow from region 430 reaching tube 446 by flow across end piece 441. The seal arrangement 468 generally comprises a gasket 468g positioned in the service cover 404. The gasket 468 is biased against an upwardly directed seal ridge 469 on end piece 441, when the cartridge 420 is installed and the cover 404 is positioned in place. For the cartridge 420 depicted, upper end piece 441 has no housing seal member thereon.
In
Referring to
In
In
In
It is noted that in the arrangement of
Cartridge 115 generally serves as a polishing filter within the assembly 50,
It is expected that typically cartridge 115 will not be serviced as often as cartridge 95, since it is not subject to as a high level of load, in particular soot load.
The media 120 of cartridge 115 can comprise a variety of materials. Typically it will be selected to be a material well suited for crankcase ventilation gas coalescing and filtering. Examples of such materials are described in WO 2008/115985 and WO 2006/084282, each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
A. Example General Characteristics of Media 120
The appropriate media, for the media 120, then, is selected for the conditions of use. Generally the media is selected to have appropriate properties with respect to: coalescing and drainage of liquid; and, filtering of gases passing therethrough with respect to particulates. Layers of media can be utilized for the media of the media pack. Example usable media described in U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/731,287, filed Oct. 28, 2005, PCT Application PCT/US2006/041738, filed Oct. 27, 2006, U.S. Provisional Application 60/656,806, filed Feb. 22, 2006; and, PCT Publication WO06/91594, published Aug. 31, 2006, and PCT Publication WO 2006/084282, published Oct. 19, 2006, each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Typically the media will comprise a continuous, non-woven, fibrous media.
An example useable media as described in U.S. provisional application 60/656,806 filed Feb. 22, 2005, incorporated herein by reference. Another example media is described in PCT Publication WO 05/083,240, published Sep. 9, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference. A third example media is described in U.S. provisional application 60/650,051 filed Feb. 4, 2005, incorporated herein by reference. The following description is of example media from U.S. provisional application 60/650,051, filed Feb. 4, 2005.
The media is typically a wet laid media is formed in a sheet form using wet laid processing, and is then positioned on/in the filter cartridge. Typically the wet laid media sheet is at least used as a media stage stacked in multiple layers.
Multiple layers, forming a gradient can be provided in a media stage, by first applying one or more layers of wet laid media of first type and then applying one or more layers of a media (typically a wet laid media) of a different, second, type. Typically when a gradient is provided, the gradient involves use of two or more media types which are selected for at least differences in efficiency. It is anticipated that the media 120, in cartridge 115, will not be provided with a significant gradient.
Herein, it is important to distinguish between the definition of the media sheet used to form the media stage, and the definitions of the overall media stage itself. Herein the term “wet laid sheet,” “media sheet” or variants thereof, is used to refer to the sheet material that is used to form the media extension of a filter, as opposed to the overall definition of the total media extension in the filter. This will be apparent from certain of the following descriptions.
Media extensions of the type of primary concern herein, are at least used for coalescing/drainage, although they typically also have particulate removal function and thus comprise a portion of an overall media stage that provides for both coalescing/drainage and desired removal efficiency of solid particulate removal.
Although alternatives are possible, an example media composition used to form a media extension in a CCV (crankcase ventilation) filter 115 for coalescing/drainage media 120 is typically as follows:
Media in accord with the general definitions provided herein, including a mix of bi-component (binder) fiber and other fiber, can be used as any (and in some instances all) layer(s) of a media stage in a crankcase ventilation filter as generally described above. When used in this manner, it will typically be placed in multiple layers, although alternatives are possible. The overall efficiency can be calculated based upon the number of layers and the efficiency of each layer. For example the efficiency at 10.5 feet per minute (3.2 m/min) for 0.3 micron DOPE particles for media stage comprising two layers of wet laid media each having an efficiency of 12% would be 22.6%, i.e., 12%+0.12×88.
Typically enough media sheets would be used in the final media stage to provide the media stage with overall efficiency of at least 85%, typically 90% or greater. In some instances it would be preferred to have the efficiency at 95% or more. In the context the term “final media stage” refers to a stage resulting from wraps or coils of the sheet(s) of the media.
B. The Preferred Calculated Pore Size.
The media extension performs two important functions:
It has been found that for crankcase ventilation filters, a calculated pore size for media used to form media extension within the range of 12 to 50 micron is generally useful. Typically the pore size is within the range of 15 to 45 micron.
The term X-Y pore size and variants thereof when used herein, is meant to refer to the theoretical distance between fibers in a filtration media. X-Y refers to the surface direction versus the Z direction which is the media thickness. The calculation assumes that all the fibers in the media are lined parallel to the surface of the media, equally spaced, and ordered as a square when viewed in cross-section perpendicular to the length of the fibers. The X-Y pore size is a distance between the fiber surfaces on the opposite corners of the square. If the media is composed of fibers of various diameters, the d2 mean of the fiber is used as the diameter. The d2 mean is the square root of the average of the diameters squared.
It has been found, in some instances, that it is useful to have calculated pore sizes on the higher end of the preferred range, typically 30 to 50 micron, when the media stage at issue has a total vertical height, in the crankcase ventilation filter of less than 7 inches (178 mm); and, pore sizes on the smaller end, about 15 to 30 micron, are sometimes useful when the filter cartridge has a height on the larger end, typically 7-12 inches (178-305 mm). A reason for this is that taller filter stages provide for a higher liquid head, during coalescing, which can force coalesced liquid flow, under gravity, downwardly through smaller pores, during drainage. The smaller pores, of course, allow for higher efficiency and fewer layers.
Of course in a typical operation in which the same media stage is being constructed for use in a variety of filter sizes, typically for at least a portion of the wet laid media used for the coalescing/drainage in initial separation, an average pore size of about 30-50 microns will be useful.
C. Solidity
Solidity is the volume fraction of media occupied by the fibers. It is the ratio of the fibers volume per unit mass divided by the media's volume per unit mass.
Typical materials preferred for use in media extension according to the present disclosure, have a percent solidity at 0.125 psi (8.6 milliards) of fewer than 10%, and typically fewer than 8%, for example 6-7%.
D. Preferred DOPE Efficiency at 10.5 Ft/Minute for 0.3 Micron Particles.
The preferred efficiency stated, is desirable for layers or sheets of media to be used to generate crankcase ventilation filters. This requirement indicates that a number of layers of the wet laid media will typically be required, in order to generate an overall desirable efficiency for the media stage of typically at least 85% or often 90% or greater, in some instances 95% or greater.
The reason a relatively low efficiency is provided in any given layer, is that it facilitates coalescing and drainage and overall function.
In general, DOPE efficiency is a fractional efficiency of a 0.3 micron DOPE particle (dactyl phthalate) challenging the media at 10 fpm. A TSAR model 3160 Bench (TSAR Incorporated, St. Paul, Minn.) can be used to evaluate this property. Model dispersed particles of DOPE are sized and neutralized prior to challenging the media.
E. The Media Composition.
1. The Bi-Component Fiber Constituent.
As indicated above, it is preferred that the fiber composition of the media include 30 to 70%, by weight, of bi-component (binder) fiber material. A major advantage of using bi-component fibers in the media, is effective utilization of fiber size while maintaining a relatively low solidity. With the bi-component fibers, this can be achieved while still accomplishing a sufficiently high strength media for handling installation in crankcase ventilation filters. Also, the bi-component fibers are binder fibers.
The bi-component fibers generally comprise two polymeric components formed together, as the fiber. Various combinations of polymers for the bi-component fiber may be useful, but it is important that the first polymer component melt at a temperature lower than the melting temperature of the second polymer component and typically below 205° C. Further, the bi-component fibers are integrally mixed and evenly dispersed with the other fibers, in forming the wet laid media. Melting of the first polymer component of the bi-component fiber is necessary to allow the bi-component fibers to form a tacky skeletal structure, which upon cooling, captures and binds many of the other fibers, as well as other bi-component fibers.
Although alternatives are possible, typically the bi-component fibers will be formed in a sheath core form, with a sheath comprising the lower melting point polymer and the core forming the higher melting point.
In the sheath-core structure, the low melting point (e.g., about 80 to 205° C.) thermoplastic is typically extruded around a fiber of the higher melting point material (e.g., about 120 to 260° C.). In use, the bi-component fibers typically have a average largest cross-sectional dimension (average fiber diameter if round) of about 5 to 50 micrometer often about 10 to 20 micrometer and typically in a fiber form generally have an average length of at least 1 mm, and not greater than 30 mm, usually no more than 20 mm, typically 1-10 mm. By “largest” in this context, reference is meant to the thickest cross-section dimension of the fibers.
Such fibers can be made from a variety of thermoplastic materials including polyolefin's (such as polyethylene's, polypropylenes), polyesters (such as polyethylene terephthalate, polybutylene terephthalate, PCT), nylons including nylon 6, nylon 6, 6, nylon 6, 12, etc. Any thermoplastic that can have an appropriate melting point can be used in the low melting component of the bi-component fiber while higher melting polymers can be used in the higher melting “core” portion of the fiber. The cross-sectional structure of such fibers can be a “side-by-side” or “sheath-core” structure or other structures that provide the same thermal bonding function. One could also use lobed fibers where the tips have lower melting point polymer. The value of the bi-component fiber is that the relatively low molecular weight resin can melt under sheet, media, or filter forming conditions to act to bind the bi-component fiber, and other fibers present in the sheet, media, or filter making material into a mechanically stable sheet, media, or filter.
Typically, the polymers of the bi-component (core/shell or sheath and side-by-side) fibers are made up of different thermoplastic materials, such as for example, polyolefin/polyester (sheath/core) bi-component fibers whereby the polyolefin, e.g. polyethylene sheath, melts at a temperature lower than the core, e.g. polyester. Typical thermoplastic polymers include polyolefins, e.g. polyethylene, polypropylene, polybutylene, and copolymers thereof, polytetrafluoroethylene, polyesters, e.g. polyethylene terephthalate, polyvinyl acetate, polyvinyl chloride acetate, polyvinyl butyral, acrylic resins, e.g. polyacrylate, and polymethylacrylate, polymethylmethacrylate, polyamides, namely nylon, polyvinyl chloride, polyvinylidene chloride, polystyrene, polyvinyl alcohol, polyurethanes, cellulosic resins, namely cellulosic nitrate, cellulosic acetate, cellulosic acetate butyrate, ethyl cellulose, etc., copolymers of any of the above materials, e.g. ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymers, ethylene-acrylic acid copolymers, styrene-butadiene block copolymers, Kraton rubbers and the like. Particularly preferred in the present invention is a bi-component fiber known as 271P available from DuPont. Others fibers include FIT 201, Kuraray N720 and the Nichimen 4080 and similar materials. All of these demonstrate the characteristics of cross-linking the sheath polymer upon completion of first melt. This is important for liquid applications where the application temperature is typically above the sheath melt temperature. If the sheath does not fully crystallize then the sheath polymer will remelt in application and coat or damage downstream equipment and components.
An example of a useable bi-component (binder) fiber for forming wet laid media sheets for use in CCV media is Dupont polyester bi-component 271P, typically cut to a length of about 6 mm.
2. The Secondary Fiber Materials.
The bi-component fibers provide a matrix for the crankcase ventilation filter media. The additional fibers or secondary fibers, sufficiently fill the matrix to provide the desirable properties for coalescing and efficiency.
The secondary fibers can be polymeric fibers, glass fibers, metal fibers, ceramic fibers or a mixture of any of these. Typically glass fibers, polymeric fibers or a mixture are used.
Glass fibers useable in filter media of the present invention include glass types known by the designations: A, C, D, E, Zero Boron E, ECR, AR, R, S, S-2, N, and the like, and generally, any glass that can be made into fibers either by drawing processes used for making reinforcement fibers or spinning processes used for making thermal insulation fibers.
Non-woven media of the invention can contain secondary fibers made from a number of both hydrophilic, hydrophobic, oleophilic, and oleophobic fibers. These fibers cooperate with the glass fiber and the bi-component fiber to form a mechanically stable, but strong, permeable filtration media that can withstand the mechanical stress of the passage of fluid materials and can maintain the loading of particulate during use. Secondary fibers are typically monocomponent fibers with average largest cross-sectional dimension (diameters if round) that can range from about 0.1 on up, typically 1 micron or greater, often 8-15 microns and can be made from a variety of materials including naturally occurring cotton, linen, wool, various cellulosic and proteinaceous natural fibers, synthetic fibers including rayon, acrylic, aramide, nylon, polyolefin, polyester fibers. One type of secondary fiber is a binder fiber that cooperates with other components to bind the materials into a sheet. Another type of secondary fiber is a structural fiber that cooperates with other components to increase the tensile and burst strength the materials in dry and wet conditions. Additionally, the binder fiber can include fibers made from such polymers as polyvinyl chloride, polyvinyl alcohol. Secondary fibers can also include inorganic fibers such as carbon/graphite fiber, metal fiber, ceramic fiber and combinations thereof.
The secondary thermoplastic fibers include, but are not limited to, polyester fibers, polyamide fibers, polypropylene fibers, copolyetherester fibers, polyethylene terephthalate fibers, polybutylene terephthalate fibers, polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) fibers, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) fibers, liquid crystalline polymer (LCP) fibers, and mixtures thereof. Polyamide fibers include, but are not limited to, nylon 6, 66, 11, 12, 612, and high temperature “nylons” (such as nylon 46) including cellulosic fibers, polyvinyl acetate, polyvinyl alcohol fibers (including various hydrolysis of polyvinyl alcohol such as 88% hydrolyzed, 95% hydrolyzed, 98% hydrolyzed and 99.5% hydrolyzed polymers), cotton, viscose rayon, thermoplastic such as polyester, polypropylene, polyethylene, etc., polyvinyl acetate, polylactic acid, and other common fiber types.
Mixtures of the fibers can be used, to obtain certain desired efficiencies and other parameters.
The sheet media of the invention are typically made using papermaking processes. Such wet laid processes are particularly useful and many of the fiber components are designed for aqueous dispersion processing. However, the media of the invention can be made by air laid processes that use similar components adapted for air laid processing. The machines used in wet laid sheet making include hand laid sheet equipment, Fourdrinier papermaking machines, cylindrical papermaking machines, inclined papermaking machines, combination papermaking machines and other machines that can take a properly mixed paper, form a layer or layers of the furnish components, remove the fluid aqueous components to form a wet sheet. A fiber slurry containing the materials is typically mixed to form a relatively uniform fiber slurry. The fiber slurry is then subjected to a wet laid papermaking process. Once the slurry is formed into a wet laid sheet, the wet laid sheet can then be dried, cured or otherwise processed to form a dry permeable, but real sheet, media, or filter. For a commercial scale process, the bi-component mats of the invention are generally processed through the use of papermaking-type machines such as commercially available Fourdrinier, wire cylinder, Stevens Former, Roto Former, Inver Former, Venti Former, and inclined Delta Former machines. Preferably, an inclined Delta Former machine is utilized. A bi-component mat of the invention can be prepared by forming pulp and glass fiber slurries and combining the slurries in mixing tanks, for example. The amount of water used in the process may vary depending upon the size of the equipment used. The furnish may be passed into a conventional head box where it is dewatered and deposited onto a moving wire screen where it is dewatered by suction or vacuum to form a non-woven bi-component web.
The binder in the bi-component fibers is activated by passing the matt through a heating step. The resulting material can then be collected in a large roll if desired.
3. Surface Treatments of the Fibers.
Modification of the surface characters of the fibers, increase in the contact angle, can enhance drainage capability of filtration media and thus the formed elements of the filter (with respect to pressure drop and mass efficiency). A method of modifying the surface of the fibers is to apply a surface treatment such as a flourochemical or silicone containing material, typically up to 5% by weight of the media.
The surface treatment agent can be applied during manufacture of the fibers, during manufacture of the media or after manufacture of the media post-treatment, or after provision of the media pack. Numerous treatment materials are available such as flourochemicals or silicone containing chemicals that increase contact angle. An example is the DuPont Zonyl™ flourochemicals, such as #7040 or #8195.
The filter cartridges 95 (and 420) as described herein above, serve the function of being a primary source for collection of material such as soot; and, as a (first) drainage stage media, in the embodiment of
1. The Soot Collection Stage 370; 440x.
The soot collection stage 370 (440x) will generally be upstream and more porous than the stage 371 (440x). That is typically it will have a higher permeability.
The material for media stage 370 (440x) will typically be chosen for its soot collection and load properties, and not for liquid coalescing and drainage properties, although some coalescing is expected to occur within the media. It will typically comprise a material sufficiently robust to withstand the circumstances of the expected environment of use. It will be sufficiently sized so that not plug prematurely with soot, before an intended service life. Polyester fibers can be used.
An example useable materials are commercially available from TWE Bocholt GmbH (Germany) as, a Tangerding non-woven media. Again, its particular properties will be chosen for soot loading. It may be desirable to obtain a similar material, but with a more robust fiber, for some applications. For cartridge 370, the media can be selected, and then be wrapped multiple times around support 170, before media 371 is added. For cartridge 420, the media 440x can be wrapped several around media 440y.
2. Media Stage 371, 440y
The media stage 371 of cartridge 95 (and stage 440y of cartridge 420) will generally comprise a media similar to that used in the media pack 120 of cartridge 115. Indeed it can be the same media. However, it will typically be a media having a somewhat higher porosity by comparison to the media 120. Advantages from this relate to having media 371 (440y) provide for a sufficiently long life. In the assembly of
Typically, the total volume occupied by the soot collecting media 370, 440x relative to the coalescing-drain media 371, 440y (in the same cartridge) will be such that the coalescing stage 371, 440y is downstream and has at least the same volume as soot collecting stage 370, 440x, typically at least 1.5 times the volume and often 2 times the volume or more.
Typically the total volume of the media 371 is substantially smaller than the total volume occupied by media 120 in cartridge 115, when present. Typically, media 120 occupies at least 2 times the volume of media 371 and often 2.5 times the volume or more.
The packing 92 from breather 90,
Again, the media pack 440 can be configured with media as previously described herein above in section VI. When multiple media stages are contained within the same cartridge, such as shown for example in
The described crankcase ventilation filter systems are particularly advantageous for use in closed crankcase ventilation but have the flexibility to be used in an open ventilation system as well.
Typically, the inlet of the system will be in communication with the crankcase, while the outlet will be in the communication with the air in-take system. Again, the outlet can be communication with a location between the air intake filter and turbo charger.
Each of the systems described comprises a housing having a gas flow inlet arrangement, a gas flow outlet arrangement and a liquid drain outlet arrangement. Further, optionally and advantageously, each uses a backpressure limiting regulation (regulator) valve arrangement; and, a separate vacuum limiting regulation (regulator) valve arrangement. Preferably neither is a vent valve that vents to the atmosphere. The backpressure limiting regulation (regulator) valve assembly is ordinarily positioned on the housing in a closed orientation, unless the crankcase pressure upstream of the assembly is sufficient to push the backpressure limiting regulation (regulator) valve assembly sufficiently for gas flow through the housing. The vacuum limiting regulation (regulator) valve assembly is ordinarily positioned on the housing in an open position, and tends toward a closed position if a vacuum condition upstream from the crankcase ventilation valve assembly is sufficient to raise issue with proper assembly operation and/or crankcase condition. Thus, typically, the backpressure limiting regulation (regulator) valve assembly is in a gas flow path upstream of the vacuum limiting regulation (regulator) valve assembly. Variations are described: (1) in which the two are positioned in an assembly having a two phase separation; and, (2) in which an assembly is depicted with a single filter cartridge (single phase) present.
Again an example system described uses an integrated breather stage described generally at 90. Its purpose is to minimize oil splashes, and large oil droplets are managed before they can reach the cartridge 95.
The breather 90 can be configured to mimic those used in some systems, independently of (i.e. outside of) a crankcase ventilation filter system. When such an integrated breather inside of a housing 51 is used, one can discontinue use of the stand alone breather. However, a stand alone breather can, in addition, be used.
It is expected that the two phase assembly (
The vacuum limiting valve arrangements serve the function of leveraging the benefit of a turbo charger vacuum to lower the pressure upstream of the crankcase ventilation filter assembly, and extend the allowable pressure range, while limiting the negative consequences of too much turbo charger vacuum on the drain height requirement (i.e. drain height needed to drain oil through a check valve and into a sump). Different engine families allow different maximum crankcase pressures. The vacuum limiting valve regulator arrangement is such that is starts regulating at different turbo charger vacuums, depending on the engine family. This can be accomplished by selecting different springs in the same system.
The backpressure limiting valve arrangement allows the system to ensure very minimal or no negative crankcase pressure. Some engines have specifications that do not allow for below zero (inch H2O) crankcase pressure, others allow small negative pressures (for example down to about −1 inch H2O.
The unique design of the backpressure limiting valve allows the proposed crankcase ventilation filter system to spike despite the possibility of having a high negative pressure inside the housing due to a dirty loaded air filter on the intake system (more turbo vacuum of the housing) and clean filter (less restriction across the system). The design significantly lowers the impact of the turbo charger vacuum on the crankcase pressure.
It is noted that the overall system 50,
The particular system 50 depicted, is shown configured for a horizontal layout. Alternate applications of the techniques can be provided, to allow for vertical orientation.
It is noted that the configuration as depicted, can be serviced without the need to separate hoses or their fittings, but simply by removing access cover 71 and thus accessing cartridges 95, 115. Typically cartridge 115 will not need to serviced as often as cartridge 95.
In the example assembly of
In general, with coalescing-drainage media, above the wet line or saturation level, gases will flow through the media pack. It is generally desirable to the provide the media such that a relatively high volume is provided for gas flow, to allow efficient, effective operation. However, a sufficiently high wet line or saturation level is needed, to generate drainage from the media downwardly.
According to the present disclosure, features, components and methods relating to crankcase ventilation filter assemblies are described. Also described are methods of assembly and use. There is no specific requirement that an assembly, method, component, technique or use, involve all of the features characterized herein.
According to an aspect of the present disclosure, crankcase ventilation filter assemblies are provided which include a housing arrangement having: a gas flow inlet arrangement, gas flow outlet arrangement; and, a liquid drain arrangement. For an example arrangement depicted in
In each of two depicted embodiments, a backpressure limiting regulation (regulator) valve assembly; and a vacuum limiting regulation (regulator) valve assembly are provided on/in the housing. The two valve assemblies are separate from one another and provide different effects. The backpressure limiting regulation (regulator) valve assembly is typically provided in a gas flow path with a normal closed position, and prevents gas flow from a crankcase flowing trough the system, unless the pressure is adequate. The vacuum limiting regulation valve assembly is positioned in a gas flow path to prevent a vacuum condition downstream from the crankcase ventilation filter assembly, from passing through the housing and into the crankcase. The backpressure limiting regulation valve arrangement is configured with a normal closed position, and the vacuum limiting regulation (regulator) valve arrangement is positioned with a normal open configuration. Several examples are provided, one in each of the embodiments.
Typically, the backpressure limiting regulation (regulator) valve assembly is positioned downstream of gas flow inlet to the assembly, and upstream from both the gas flow outlet and the vacuum limiting regulation valve assembly. Typically, the vacuum limiting regulation valve assembly is positioned in a gas flow path downstream from the backpressure limiting regulation valve assembly; and, upstream from a gas flow outlet from the assembly.
An example crankcase ventilation filter assembly depicted includes a multi-phase separation system having (i.e. including): (1) a first separation phase configured for coalescing of at least a portion of liquid in gases directed into gas flow inlet arrangement and direction of those coalesced liquids to the first liquid drain; and (2) a second separator phase configured for coalescing at least a portion of liquid in gases received from the first separation phase, and direction of at that coalesced liquid to the second drain. Typically, the first and second drains are isolated in the system, within the housing arrangement, such that liquid flow communication directly between the two is not possible. By this, it is meant that filter members, and seals thereof, isolate the two drains from one another, so that liquid cannot flow directly between the two.
Typically, the crankcase ventilation filter assembly includes, as the first separation phase, a first serviceable filter cartridge comprising a first media pack surrounding a first open filter interior and positioned to receive gases directed to the first open filter interior before direction through the first media pack. That is, the first serviceable filter cartridge is configured to be used with a filtering flow through a media pack thereof, of gases from in-to-out.
Also, typically the second separation phase includes a second serviceable filter cartridge comprising a second media pack surrounding an second open filter interior and positioned for gas flow through the second media pack and into the second open filter interior, during filtering. That is, it is generally configured for out-to-in gas flow, during filtering.
By “serviceable” in connection with the characterization of the first filter cartridge and the second filter cartridge, it is meant that the cartridges can be removed from the assembly, for example to be replaced. Typically, the first and second serviceable filter cartridges are separate from one another, and can be separately serviced.
In an example system depicted, a backpressure limiting valve regulator arrangement is positioned upstream of the media on the first serviceable filter cartridge and downstream from the gas flow inlet arrangement. That is, gases flowing through the housing from the gas flow inlet arrangement to the media pack of the first serviceable filter cartridge, must pass a backpressure valve regulator arrangement, configured to close, if desired, to inhibit an undesirable vacuum condition within the housing, from being transferred through the gas flow inlet to a crankcase in use. Typically, the backpressure limiting vale regulator valve arrangement is configured to have a “normal closed” orientation, i.e. to be closed when the system and engine are completely shut-off and to only bias open, to allow gas flow to reach the first filter cartridge, when the engine is on an operating properly.
In a typical example system described, the crankcase ventilation filter assembly also includes the vacuum limiting regulation valve arrangement positioned in a gas flow path downstream of the media pack of the second serviceable filter cartridge and upstream of the gas flow outlet arrangement. Such a vacuum limiting regulator valve arrangement is typically configured to inhibit an undesirable vacuum condition, downstream from the housing, from being transferred through the gas flow outlet to equipment within the housing. The vacuum limiting regulation valve arrangement is typically configured to have a “normal open” configuration, i.e. it is an open valve that tends to close as the vacuum condition downstream (with respect to gas flow) of the assembly increases.
An inertial impaction arrangement is described. In embodiments depicted, it is positioned over (or across) the gas flow inlet arrangement. In examples depicted, the inertial impaction arrangement typically comprises an impermeable plate positioned over an upwardly directed inlet aperture and spaced therefrom by an open support (side gas flow) arrangement. The open support arrangement is typically a framework that allows gases to pass therethrough, as they enter the housing from the gas flow inlet. The inertial impaction arrangement provides that selected liquid within gases passing into the housing, will impact the plate, and drain. Typically, the inertial impaction plate will be spaced from the inlet aperture by a distance of 15 mm-30 mm, inclusive, although alternatives are possible. The inertial impaction arrangement, comprising the impermeable plate and the support arrangement can be formed integral with adjacent portions of the housing.
In more general terms, according to the present disclosure, an inertial impaction arrangement and principles relating thereto, for use in a crankcase ventilation filter assembly, is provided. In general, the assembly includes a inlet tube that is directed into a housing, to a location surrounded by media of a cartridge, i.e. into an open filter interior. The inlet tube has a closed end, closed by inertial impaction plate, and adjacent the inertial impaction plate is provided a side gas flow opening arrangement or open support arrangement. As gases enter the housing through the inlet tube, they are directed toward the inertial impaction plate, at which some coalescing occurs. The gases pass through the open support arrangement (side gas flow passageway arrangement) and then enter the cartridge involved. The tube can be upwardly directed or downwardly directed, depending on the system. An example is depicted in which the tube is upwardly directed.
The housing of example arrangements depicted, each comprise a base member and a removable access cover arrangement, in the examples depicted comprising a single access cover. Each can comprise molded plastic.
An example crankcase ventilation filter assembly is depicted which includes, positioned within the housing, an optional breather, positioned in the first separation phase at a location in a gas flow path: through the first separation phase; and, downstream from the inertial impaction arrangement and upstream from the media pack at the first serviceable filter cartridge. The breather is typically configured not to be serviceable, i.e. not to ordinarily be removed from the assembly for servicing. A particular breather packing is described, which includes a high surface area packing, such as a metal foil packing, configured in a housing. The housing of an example depicted is configured with an outer cylindrical impermeable sidewall, and permeable top and bottom sections, with the packing positioned between the permeable top and bottom sections. In an example assembly depicted, a cross-sectional dimension of the housing is larger than a cross-sectional dimension of the inertial impaction plate. An example coalescer pack is depicted, configured for generally vertical direction of gas flow therethrough, from bottom to a top, in use, with liquid collected therein draining downwardly to a region of the housing immediately surrounding the gas flow inlet, to eventually drain through the inlet back into the crankcase.
In an example assembly depicted, the backpressure limiting regulation valve arrangement is positioned in gas flow path from the coalescer pack to the first media pack of the first serviceable filter cartridge. In the example, the backpressure limiting valve regulator comprises spring-loaded valve diaphragm positioned above the breather and having a central ridge valve portion surrounded by a flexible rolling hinge portion.
In an example assembly depicted, the vacuum limiting regulation valve arrangement comprises a spring-loaded a diaphragm positioned above the second serviceable filter cartridge, over an inlet end of an exit tube around which the second serviceable filter cartridge is positioned.
In example systems described, the first serviceable filter cartridge comprises a first media pack positioned around a central media support, at a location between first and second end pieces. An assembly is described in which the central media support and first and second end pieces are formed integral with one another, for example from plastic. The media pack for the first serviceable filter cartridge can comprise a multi-stage media pack having an upstream soot collection stage and a downstream coalescing/drain stage of media. When the cartridge is configured for in-to-out flow during filtering, the soot stage would typically be surrounded by the coalescing/drain stage. When the cartridge is configured for out-to-in flow during filtering, the soot stage would typically surround the coalescing/drain stage. Examples of each are depicted. Example materials are described. Typically, the soot collection stage would be configured to have a high porosity (lower solidity) than the coalescer/drain stage.
With such a cartridge, the second end piece may include a liquid drain arrangement therethrough underneath, in axial overlap with, media (for example the coalescing-drain stage) and positioned in axial overlap with the media at a location not in axial overlap with the soot collection stage of media (if present). An example assembly is depicted, in which this liquid drain arrangement comprises spaces positioned adjacent an outer periphery of the media pack of the first cartridge. In another example depicted, the liquid drain arrangement comprises spaces or apertures spaced adjacent the inner periphery of the media pack of the cartridge.
In an example depicted, the first cartridge includes, in the first end piece, a central aperture; and, an upper housing seal arrangement. The upper housing seal arrangement for an example depicted, includes a support directed from the first end piece in a direction away from the second end piece, having a seal member mounted thereon, the seal member being oriented to form a radial seal. In an example described, the radial seal is oriented to be directed radially outwardly during sealing, and can comprise a variety of sealing materials, an o-ring being an example.
In an example first cartridge depicted, the second end piece includes a central aperture therethrough, the lower housing seal arrangement thereon comprising a seal support directed axially from the second end piece in a direction away from the first end piece of the media. The support is configured to support a housing seal member thereon, typically configured to form a radially directed seal. In an example depicted, the seal member is supported to form a radially inwardly directed seal. An example housing seal arrangement would be an o-ring, although alternatives can be used.
In the example arrangement depicted, the second serviceable filter cartridge also comprises a media pack positioned around a central media support, at a location between first and second end pieces. An example is depicted, which has first and second end pieces and a central support, the portions, are integral pieces of a single plastic component. The second serviceable filter cartridge includes, on the first end piece, projecting in a direction away from the second end piece and the media, a housing seal arrangement comprising a seal support having a seal member thereon. In an example depicted, the seal member is configured to form a radially directed seal, an example being an outwardly directed radial seal. An example seal member depicted is an o-ring.
In the example second cartridge depicted, a seal arrangement is also positioned on the second end piece; in the example shown comprising a seal support directed from the second end piece in a direction away from the first end piece of them media. The second support includes a housing seal member thereon, for example an o-ring, configured to form a radial seal. In an example depicted, the radial seal on the second end piece is configured to form an outwardly directed radial seal.
Seal(s) can be mounted on housing part(s), rather than cartridge parts, if desired.
In an example assembly depicted, the media pack of the first cartridge is a two-stage media, having soot collecting media stage upstream and a more dense coalescing/drainage stage. In such a cartridge, typically the soot media stage has a volume no more than an often substantially smaller than, the coalescing/drainage stage. Typically, any lower drain arrangement from the first cartridge is positioned underneath the coalescing/drain stage and not the soot collation stage.
In an assembly depicted, a cartridge (for example a second cartridge) only comprises coalescing/drainage stage. When two cartridges are present, typically, the media of the second cartridge is typically of a material similar to the coalescing/drainage stage of the first cartridge. Typically substantially more media is included in the coalescing/drainage stage of the second cartridge, than the coalescing/drain stage of the first cartridge, to provide for higher efficiency.
The second end piece of the second cartridge depicted includes a liquid drain arrangement underneath, in axial overlap with the media of the second cartridge at a location positioned spaced radially inwardly from overlap with the center of the media. This liquid drain arrangement, for example, can comprise apertures positioned around an inner perimeter of the second end piece, in axial overlap with the media.
Also according to the present disclosure, a crankcase ventilation filter cartridge, depicted in the arrangement of
Methods and techniques are also described, generally involving use of the components described. Further, methods of assembly are described, which involve creating selected portions of the assembly and installing them as described. Also, methods of service are described.
There is no specific requirement that an assembly, component, feature, technique or method include all of the features depicted characterized herein, in order to obtain some benefit according to the present disclosure.
This application is being filed on 9 Oct. 2012, as a US National Stage of PCT International Patent application No. PCT/US2011/036305, filed 12 May 2011 in the name of Donaldson Company, Inc., a U.S. national corporation, applicant for the designation of all countries except the US, and Veli Kalayci, a citizen of Turkey, Manpreet Phull, a citizen of India, and Thomas Lundgren and Daniel Adamek, both citizens of the U.S., applicants for the designation of the US only. The present application includes the disclosure of, with edits and additions, U.S. provisional application 61/334,423 filed May 13, 2010. The PCT/US2011/036305 and 61/334,423 applications are incorporated herein by reference. To the extent appropriate, a claim of priority is made to each of the above disclosed applications.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/036305 | 5/12/2011 | WO | 00 | 5/14/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/143464 | 11/17/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5716197 | Paul et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
6354283 | Hawkins et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
7017563 | Dworatzek et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
8460424 | Rogers et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8499749 | Mosset et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8617277 | De Paepe et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
20020033009 | Gieseke et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030051455 | Gieseke et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040139734 | Schmeichel et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050193694 | Gieseke et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050211232 | Dushek et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050263122 | Saito | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20080035103 | Barris et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080142091 | Meinig et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090071111 | Lundgren et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090139503 | Park | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100031940 | Mosset et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100077972 | Doers | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110017155 | Jacob | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110036242 | Enderich et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110258975 | Lundgren et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20140076283 | Pursifull, Ross | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150020785 | An et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201 22 494 | Jan 2006 | DE |
10 2004 061938 | Jun 2006 | DE |
20 2005 012 403 | Feb 2007 | DE |
10 2007 062098 | Jun 2009 | DE |
1 144 079 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1 933 009 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2004045743 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2008147585 | Mar 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/036305 mailed Jan. 18, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140109885 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61334423 | May 2010 | US |