The present invention relates to an engine mounting configuration, and more particularly to an engine mounting configuration for mounting a turbofan gas turbine engine to an aircraft pylon.
A gas turbine engine may be mounted at various points on an aircraft such as a pylon integrated with an aircraft structure. An engine mounting configuration ensures the transmission of loads between the engine and the aircraft structure. The loads typically include the weight of the engine, its thrust, aerodynamic loads, maneuver loads, and rotary torque about the engine axis. The engine mounting configuration must also absorb the deformations to which the engine is subjected during different flight phases and the dimensional variations due to thermal expansion and retraction.
One conventional engine mounting configuration includes a pylon having a forward mount and an aft mount. The front mount handles the thrust load from the engine as well as vertical and side loads from the front of the engine. The rear mount handles vertical and side loads from the rear of the engine and the engine torque.
Although effective, one disadvantage of this mounting arrangement is the relatively large “punch loads” into the engine cases from the thrust links which react the thrust from the engine and couple the thrust to the pylon. These loads tend to distort the intermediate case, low pressure compressor (LPC), fan, and high pressure compressor (HPC) cases. The distortion can cause the clearances between the static cases and rotating blade tips to increase. This may negatively affect engine performance and increase fuel burn.
Furthermore, when reacting thrust at the front mount, the engine centerline is deflected downward therefrom. The engine centerline may be still further deflected downward from the nacelle air load when the aircraft rotates while taking off. To accommodate this centerline deflection, the engine compressor and turbine blade require larger tip clearances which may negatively affect engine performance.
Accordingly, it is desirable to provide an engine mounting configuration which minimizes backbone bending and engine case distortion.
The engine mounting configuration according to the present invention reacts the engine thrust at an aft mount. This reduces engine backbone bending. By reacting thrust at the rear mount, the engine centerline is bent upwards therefrom. The nacelle air load during takeoff rotation operates to counteract the thrust load. The cumulative effect is a minimization of blade tip clearance requirements which improves engine performance. Since intermediate case distortion is minimized, the intermediate case may readily support other engine components such as an engine accessory gearbox, pumps, an oil tank and such like, which thereby saves weight and space within the core compartment.
Another mounting configuration removes the side load from the front mount such that the front mount reacts only the vertical loads. The side loads are reacted through a fixed moment rear mount.
The present invention therefore provides an engine mounting configuration which minimizes backbone bending and engine case distortion.
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the currently disclosed embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows:
The turbofan engine 10 includes a core engine within a core nacelle C that houses a low spool 14 and high spool 24. The low spool 14 includes a low pressure compressor 16 and low pressure turbine 18. The low spool 14 drives a fan section 20 connected to the low spool 14 either directly or through a gear train 25.
The high spool 24 includes a high pressure compressor 26 and high pressure turbine 28. A combustor 30 is arranged between the high pressure compressor 26 and high pressure turbine 28. The low and high spools 14, 24 rotate about an engine axis of rotation A.
Airflow enters the fan nacelle N which at least partially surrounds the core nacelle C. The fan section 20 communicates airflow into the core nacelle C to the low pressure compressor 16. Core airflow compressed by the low pressure compressor 16 and the high pressure compressor 26 is mixed with the fuel in the combustor 30 where is ignited, and burned. The resultant high pressure combustor products are expanded through the high pressure turbine 28 and low pressure turbine 18. The turbines 28, 18 are rotationally coupled to the compressors 26, 16 respectively to drive the compressors 26, 16 in response to the expansion of the combustor product. The low pressure turbine 18 also drives the fan section 20 through gear train 25. A core engine exhaust exits the core nacelle C through a core nozzle 43 defined between the core nacelle C and a tail cone 33.
The engine static structure 44 of
The engine static structure 44 further supports a bearing system upon which the turbines 28, 18, compressors 26, 16 and fan rotor 32 rotate. A #1 fan dual bearing 60 which rotationally supports the fan rotor 32 is axially located generally within the fan case 46. The #1 fan dual bearing 60 is preloaded to react fan thrust forward and aft (in case of surge). A #2 LPC bearing 62 which rotationally supports the low spool 14 is axially located generally within the intermediate case (IMC) 48. The #2 LPC bearing 62 reacts thrust. A #3 high spool thrust bearing 64 which rotationally supports the high spool 24 and also reacts thrust. The #3 high spool bearing 64 is also axially located generally within the IMC 48 just forward of the high pressure compressor case 50. A #4 bearing 66 which rotationally supports a rear segment of the high spool 14 reacts only radial loads. The #4 bearing 66 is axially located generally within the thrust case 52 in an aft section thereof. A #5 bearing 68 rotationally supports the rear segment of the low spool 14 and reacts only radial loads. The #5 bearing 68 is axially located generally within the thrust case 52 just aft of the #4 bearing 66. It should be understood that this is an exemplary configuration and any number of bearings may be utilized.
The #4 bearing 66 and the #5 bearing 68 are supported within a mid-turbine frame (MTF) structure 70 to straddle radially extending structural struts 72 which are preloaded in tension (
A dual rotor engine such as that disclosed in the illustrated embodiment typically includes a forward frame and a rear frame that support the main rotor bearings. The intermediate case (IMC) 48 also includes the radially extending structural struts 40 which are generally radially aligned with the #2 LPC bearing 62 (
The turbofan gas turbine engine 10 is mounted to aircraft structure such as an aircraft wing through an engine mounting configuration 80 defined by the pylon 12. The engine mounting configuration 80 includes a forward mount 82 and an aft mount 84 (
Referring to
The aft mount 84 includes a beam transverse to an engine axis A having a first arm 88A and a second arm 88B that mount to the MTF 70 at the thrust case 52 (
The first arm 88A includes an attachment fastener 90A and the second arm 88B includes an attachment fastener 90B defined along a respective fastener axis F1, F2 which extends radially inward to intersect the engine axis A. It should be understood that various bushings, vibration isolators and such like may additionally be utilized herewith.
The first arm 88A supports a link load L1, a sideload S and a thrust load T1. The second arm 88B supports a link load L2 and a thrust load T2. The link loads L1, L2 are torque loads generated by the design of the engine 10. The aft mount 84 is rotatable about an aft mount axis M (
The engine mounting configuration 80 minimizes IMC 48 distortion as the change in thrust location reduces the amount of backbone bending in the engine. By reacting thrust at the rear mount 84, the engine centerline A is bent upwards in response to thrust loads (
The engine mounting configuration 80 eliminates the heretofore required thrust links from the IMC, which frees up valuable space adjacent the IMC 48 and the HPC case 50 within the core nacelle C (
The accessory gearbox AG may also be mounted directly to the IMC 48 thereby eliminating the conventionally required lay shaft. That is, the accessory gearbox AG mount location on the IMC 48 facilitates direct drive and a smaller diameter core nacelle C (
Referring to
The aft mount 84′ includes a beam having a first arm 88A′ and a second arm 88B′ that mount to the MTF as described above. The first arm 88A′ supports a link load L1, a side load S1, and a thrust load T1. The second arm 88B′ supports a link load L2 and a thrust load T2. The aft mount 84′ is rotationally fixed about axis M such that the side load is removed from the forward mount 82′ and torque (link load) is carried by the unequal thrust loads (T1≠T2) at the aft mount 84′. That is, the side load is reacted as unequal thrust loads (T1≠T2) at the aft mount 84′.
Referring to
It should be understood that relative positional terms such as “forward,” “aft,” “upper,” “lower,” “above,” “below,” and the like are with reference to the normal operational attitude of the vehicle and should not be considered otherwise limiting.
The foregoing description is exemplary rather than defined by the limitations within. Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. The disclosed embodiments of this invention have been disclosed, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. It is, therefore, to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. For that reason the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3327971 | Stewart et al. | Jun 1967 | A |
4037809 | Legrand | Jul 1977 | A |
4044973 | Moorehead | Aug 1977 | A |
4266741 | Murphy | May 1981 | A |
4966338 | Gordon | Oct 1990 | A |
5136839 | Armstrong | Aug 1992 | A |
5174525 | Schilling | Dec 1992 | A |
5273393 | Jones et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5275357 | Seelen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5277382 | Seelen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5320307 | Spofford et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5372338 | Carlin et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5409184 | Udall et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5443229 | O'Brien et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5452575 | Freid | Sep 1995 | A |
5474258 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5497961 | Newton | Mar 1996 | A |
5746391 | Rodgers et al. | May 1998 | A |
5810287 | O'Boyle et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5860276 | Newton | Jan 1999 | A |
5871175 | Demouzon et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871176 | Demouzon et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5871177 | Demouzon et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5921500 | Ellis et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5927644 | Ellis et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6126110 | Seaquist et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138949 | Manende et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6189830 | Schnelz et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6474597 | Cazenave | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6517027 | Abruzzese | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6652222 | Wojtyczka et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6708925 | Udall | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6899518 | Lucas et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6935591 | Udall | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7021585 | Loewenstein et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7055330 | Miller | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7134286 | Markarian et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7677493 | Diochon et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20060090448 | Henry | May 2006 | A1 |
20060248900 | Suciu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2010969 | Dec 1977 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090056343 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |