Engine oil composition

INDUSTRIAL FIELD OF APPLICATION
This invention relates to an engine oil composition, more specifically, to an engine oil composition which is produced by blending molybdenum dithiocarbamate (hereinafter referred to as "MoDTC") and zinc dithiophosphate containing a primary alkyl group having 8 to 14 carbon atoms (hereinafter referred to as "ZnDTP") to a base oil for an engine oil, which has high residual MoDTC even when the oil degrades, hence providing low friction and low wear over a long period of time, leading to lower fuel consumption. The invention also relates to an engine oil composition which is produced by blending MoDTC, ZnDTP and polyglycerin half ester to a base oil for an engine oil, that is stable under fluid lubricating conditions from extreme pressure conditions and which has an excellent coefficient of friction.
PRIOR ART
Improvements in engine oils have been attempted in the past because of the promotion of energy conservation and technological progresses related to higher performance and higher output from automobiles, but the environment for engine oils has become more severe due to the rise of oil temperatures resulting from higher speeds and higher outputs of engines, deterioration of friction conditions, the limitations on oil capacity due to reductions in weight, the requirements for maintenance-free operation resulting from long drain, etc.
Engine oils play an important role in valve actuating systems, bearings, etc., in addition to their function as a lubricant between pistons and liners. Lubricating conditions differ depending on portions of the engine, and the performance required for engine oils has become diversified. In the piston portion, for example, a fluid lubricating condition is predominant. In this case, a lower viscosity engine oil plays the greatest role in reducing friction loss. When the viscosity of the engine oil is reduced, however, sealability deteriorates and wear increases. In the valve actuating system, on the other hand, lubrication is mainly mixed lubricating and boundary lubricating conditions. Accordingly, because reductions in engine oil viscosity has a negative effect on wear, additives having high extreme-pressure performance and high wear resistance become necessary.
In addition, the regulations on fuel consumption of automobiles and the restrictions on exhaust gases have become more severe due to environmental problems such as the greenhouse effect, emissions of nitrogen oxides (NO.sub.x), etc. For these reasons, further improvements in mechanical efficiency such as from reductions in engine oil viscosity and excellent friction regulating additives are being sought.
As the viscosity of engine oils has been reduced, MoDTC and ZnDTP have been employed so as to reduce frictional loss, to prevent wear and to impart extreme-pressure properties, as additives for the base oil for engine oil. However, when these additives are merely mixed, the resulting engine oil compositions cannot substantially solve such problems as exhaust gas emissions, wear associated with the restrictions on fuel consumption drops in mechanical efficiency resulting from seizure and frictional loss, etc.
MoDTC undergoes deterioration as the oil deteriorates and eventually loses its friction reduction effect. Therefore, how to maintain the performance of MoDTC, particularly in engine oils, has been a critical problem that is yet to be solved. From the aspect of reducing engine oil viscosity or the fuel consumption by friction regulating additives, however, the use of MoDTC is essentially necessary at the present moment. In order to solve such problems as wear, drops in mechanical efficiency due to seizure and frictional loss, etc., therefore, it is necessary to fully exploit the performance of MoDTC, and from the aspect of long drain, too, an oil which maintains the performance of MoDTC even when the oil degrades and which exhibits a friction reduction effect for a long time must be developed.
In connection with ZnDTP, J. A. Spearot, F. Caracciolo et al report in SAE Paper 790941 (1979) that phosphorus (P) in engine oils lowers the functions of catalysts and O.sub.2 sensors and deteriorates the purification ratios of CO, HC and NO.sub.x in exhaust gas. At present, attempts have been vigorously made to reduce the P content on the basis of the observation described above, but when wear resistance is considered in conjunction with the lower viscosity of engine oil, the addition of ZnDTP as a wear-proofing agent becomes inevitable. Even so, oils having a normal P content of more than 1,200 ppm are not presently being used as engine oils.
Under the circumstances described above, Japanese Patent Laid-Open No.63-178197 proposes a lubricating oil composition for a power transmission apparatus having a traction drive mechanism which composition is obtained by blending MoDTC and ZnDTP having a primary alkyl group to a base oil consisting of saturated hydrocarbon compounds having a condensed ring and/or an uncondensed ring as its principal component. In the composition of this patent application, however, the oil is a lubricating oil for the power transmission apparatus having the traction drive mechanism, though the composition uses MoDTC and ZnDTP. Since the application of this lubricating oil is different from that of an engine oil, its basic oil is specific, and performance as an engine oil cannot be expected.
Japanese Patent Publication No.3-23595 proposes a lubricating oil composition prepared by blending 0.2 to 5 percent by weight of MoDTC, 0.1 to 7 percent by weight of ZnDTP (at least 50% of which consists of ZnDTP having a secondary alkyl group), 0.1 to 20 percent by weight of calcium alkylbenzenesulfonate and 1 to 15 percent by weight of alkenylsuccinimido to 98.6 to 53 percent by weight of a mineral oil and/or synthetic oil having a kinematic viscosity ranging from 3 to 20 cSt at 100.degree. C.
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No.62-275198 proposes a composition prepared by adding 3 to 10 percent by weight in total, of an organomolybdenum compound, organozinc compound and aryl phosphate, each being soluble in a base oil for lubricant, to said base oil, and a lubricant prepared by blending the composition in a weight ratio of 0.5 to 1.5 (organomolybdenum compound):0.5 to 1.5 (organozinc compound):0.5 to 1.5 (aryl phosphate).
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No.5-279688 teaches that friction characteristics can be improved without reducing wear resistance and other characteristics by blending an organomolybdenum compound, aliphatic ester, metal detergent (calcium or magnesium sulfonate, calcium or magnesium phenate), ashless detergent-dispersant (benzylamine, alkenylsucciniimide, boron derivative of alkylsucciniimide) and wear-proofing agent (zinc dithiophosphate, zinc dithiocarbamate).
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No.5-311186 teaches that the coefficient of friction of a lubricating oil can be drastically lowered by blending sulfurized oxymolybdenum dithiocarbamate and/or sulfurized oxymolybdenum organophosphorodithioate; an aliphatic ester and/or an organoamide compound in specific amount ratios with a combination system of a metal dithiocarbamate having not greater than 4 carbon atoms with an oil-soluble amine compound.
Problems the Invention Aims to Solve
However, although the composition of Japanese Patent Publication No.3-23595 has high initial performance, its performance drops with degradation of the oil. Thus, this prior art cannot solve the problems described above, and improvements are left yet to be made.
Japanese Patent Laid-Open No.62-275198 describes that MoDTC, ZnDTP and aryl phoaphate preferably exist specifically in a weight ratio of about 1:1:1, and that the total weight in the final lubricant (that is, the total of the three components) is particularly from 3.9 to 9.9%, more particularly 5.9 to 7.9% such as about 6.9%. In the composition described above, however, the amounts of addition of both MoDTC and ZnDTP are so great that the problems of friction resistance and wear resistance are left yet to be improved. As also described already, the reduction of the P content has been made vigorously in engine oils, and oils having a F content of higher than 1,200 ppm are not generally employed. For this reason, too, the composition described above cannot be used for engine oils.
Moreover, none of these patent applications study the behaviour of MoDTC with degradation of the oil, and it is doubtful whether the performance of MoDTC can be maintained at the time of oil degradation. Further, performance of residual MoDTC has become more important at the time of oil degradation with increases in the term of long drain.
Further, the compositions described in the above patent applications do not completely solve the various problems with engine oils described above. In other words, the use of MoDTC is essential at the present time from the aspects of lower viscosity engine oils or saving energy costs through friction regulating additives. Also, it is very important to find a composition which fully exploits the performance of MoDTC in order to solve the various problems due to drops in mechanical efficiency from friction, seizure and friction loss.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an engine oil composition which fully exploits the performance of MoDTC, restricts the degradation of MoDTC itself, has a high residual MoDTC property even at the time of oil degradation, provides low friction and low wear for a long term and results in reduced fuel consumption, in order to solve the various problems with friction.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an engine oil composition which fully exploits the performance of MoDTC and has an excellent coefficient of friction and extreme-pressure properties under fluid lubricating conditions from extreme-pressure conditions.
Means of Solving the Problems
To accomplish the objects described above, the present inventors have conducted studies and have found out that the performance of MoDTC can be extended and that low friction as well as low wear can be achieved over long periods by combining MoDTC with ZnDTP having a primary alkyl group with 8 to 14 carbon atoms. Thus, a first embodiment of the present invention has been completed.
In other words, an engine oil composition according to the first embodiment of the present invention comprises, as the essential components:
(A) at least one kind of molybdenum dithiocarbamate (MoDTC) represented by the following general formula (1): ##STR1## wherein each of R.sup.1, R.sup.2, R.sup.3 and R.sup.4 may be the same or different and each represent an alkyl group having 8 to 16 carbon atoms, X represents a sulfur atom or oxygen atom, and a ratio of the sulfur atoms to the oxygen atoms is from 1/3 to 3/1;
(B) at least one kind of neutral or basic zinc dithiophosphate (ZnDTP) represented by the following general formula (2) wherein the proportion of zinc dithiophosphate whose R, which may be the same or different and represents a primary alkyl group having 8 to 14 carbon atoms, is at least 50 percent by weight in all the zinc dithiophosphates:
Zn�(RO).sub.2 PS.sub.2 !.sub.2 .cndot.aZnO (2)
wherein a is 0 or 1/3 and R may be the same or different and represents an alkyl group having 3 to 14 carbon atoms: and
(C) a base oil for engine oil;
wherein the proportion of the Component (A) is 0.03 to 1 parts by weight based on 100 parts by weight of base oil for the engine oil, and the proportion of the Component (B) is 0.01 to 2 parts by weight.
In the engine oil composition according to the present invention, it is particularly preferred that all R groups in the general formula (2) be 2-ethylhexyl groups.
Also, to accomplish another of the objects described above, the present inventors have conducted intensive studies and have found out that surprising lubricating performance can be obtained by combining MoDTC, ZnDTP and a certain kind of half ester of a particular fatty acid (in the present specification, a polyhydric alcohol in which part of the hydroxyl groups in said alcohol are esterified will be called a "half ester"). Thus, a second embodiment of the present invention has been completed.
In other words, the engine oil composition according to the second embodiment of the present invention is prepared by blending 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of at least one kind of polyglycerin half esters represented by the following general formula (3) to 100 parts by weight of a base oil for engine oil: ##STR2## wherein n is an integer of 1.ltoreq.n.ltoreq.9. R.sup.5 to R.sup.8 each represent hydrogen atoms or an acyl groups having 8 to 20 carbon atoms with the provision that all R.sup.5 to R.sup.8 are never simultaneously either all hydrogen atoms nor all acyl groups, and individual R.sup.8 's may be the same or different when n is 2 or more.
When importance is attached to the extreme-pressure property of the engine oil composition in the second embodiment of the present invention, it is preferred that the polyglycerin half esters are at least one kind in which the number (Y) of the acyl groups in the general formula (3) is within the range of 1.ltoreq.Y.ltoreq.(n+5)/2 �polyglycerin half esters of this kind will hereinafter be called "polyglycerin half esters (I)"!.
In the second embodiment of the present invention, it is further preferred that the polyglycerin half ester is at least one kind in which the proportion of lauryl groups and/or oleyl groups to all the acyl groups in the general formula (3) is at least 25% �polyglycerin half esters of this kind will hereinafter be called "polyglycerin half esters (II)"!.
Further, in the second embodiment of the present invention, it is most preferred that the polyglycerin half esters are at least one kind in which the acyl groups in the general formula (3) are all oleyl groups and/or lauryl groups �polyglycerin half esters of this kind will hereinafter be called "polyglycerin half esters (III)!.
Embodiments
In MoDTC represented by the general formula (1) as the Component (A) used in the present invention, the hydrocarbyl groups represented by R.sup.1, R.sup.2, R.sup.3 and R.sup.4 may contain saturated or unsaturated bonds and may be a straight chain type, a branched chain type or ring-like, or combinations thereof. Though they may contain 8 to 16 carbon atoms in some cases from the aspect of lubricating properties, they preferably contain 8 to 13 carbon atoms with 8 carbon atoms being particularly suitable.
Such hydrocarbyl groups are aliphatic groups, aromatic groups and aromatic-aliphatic groups. More concretely, they are alkyl groups such as an octyl group, 2-ethylhexyl group, nonyl group, decyl group, dodecyl group, lauryl group, tridecyl group, isotridecyl group, tetradecyl group, pentadecyl group, hexadecyl group, and so forth. Preferred among them are the 2-ethylhexyl group, octyl group, tridecyl group and isodecyl group, and further preferred are those in which R.sup.1, R.sup.2, R.sup.3 and R.sup.4 are a 2-ethylhexyl group.
Further, in MoDTC represented by the general formula (1), none of the X's are simultaneously O or S. In other words, the ratio S/O is within the range of 1/3 to 3/1. If all of the X's are oxygen, the lubricating property becomes inferior, and if all of the X's are sulfur, corrosion is more likely to develop.
(A) MoDTC represented by the general formula (1) is used in an amount of 0.03 to 1 part by weight, preferably 0.1 to 0.6 part by weight based on 100 parts by weight of the base oil for engine oil. If the amount is less than 0.03 parts by weight, the reduction of the coefficient of friction is not sufficient and if it exceeds 1 part by weight, a further effect of reducing the coefficient of friction cannot be obtained, and conversely adverse influences such as the occurrence of sludge tend to occur.
Such (A) MoDTC can be produced by the methods described, for example, in Japanese Patent Publication Nos.53-31646, 55-40593, 56-12638, 57-24797, 58-50233 and 62-81396.
In ZnDTP as the Component (B) represented by the general formula (2) used in the present invention, a is zero or 1/3. When a=zero, the component is generally called a "neutral salt" and when a=1/3, it is generally called a "basic salt". The (B) ZnDTP used in the present invention may be a neutral salt, a basic salt or combinations thereof.
In (B) ZnDTP represented by the general formula (2) used in the present invention, the hydrocarbyl group represented by R may contain saturated or unsaturated bonds having 3 to 14 carbon atoms, and may be a straight chain type, a branched chain type, a ring-type or combinations thereof. Further, the hydrocarbyl groups may be the same or different, but the proportion of ZnDTP in which all of the R groups are primary alkyl groups having 8 to 14 carbon atoms (they may be the same or different) in all the ZnDTPs must be at least 50 percent by weight.
Such hydrocarbyl groups include aliphatic types, aromatic types and aromatic-aliphatic types. Concrete examples include alkyl groups such as an octyl group, 2-ethylhexyl group, nonyl group, decyl group, lauryl group, tridecyl group, tetradecyl group, etc; cycroalkyl groups such as a cyclohexanethyl group, etc; and aryl groups such as an alkyl-substituted phenyl group (for example, phenylmethyl group, phenylethyl group and xylyl group). The hydrocarbyl groups are preferably a 2-ethylhexyl group, octyl group, nonyl group and tridecyl group and most preferably, all of the R groups are 2-ethylhexyl and octyl groups.
These (B) ZnDTPs may be used either individually or in combinations of two or more in mixture. Though they function as an extreme-pressure, agent, anti-oxidant, corrosion inhibitor, etc., the effect of the present invention cannot be obtained unless at least 50 percent by weight of ZnDTP having the primary alkyl group is added. The greater the content of ZnDTP whose primary alkyl groups are all 2-ethylhexyl groups or octyl groups, the higher the MoDTC residual effect becomes.
The (B) ZnDTP represented by the general formula (2) is used in the amount of 0.01 to 2 parts by weight based on 100 parts by weight of the base oil for engine oil. If the amount is less than 0.01 part by weight, the effect of improving the MoDTC (A) residual property is not sufficient and if it exceeds 2 parts by weight, the coefficient of friction at the time of degradation of the base oil or the engine oil deteriorates. If the amount added is great, the catalyst of an exhaust gas device is likely to be poisoned. Therefore, the (B) ZnDTP is preferably used in an amount not greater than 1.5 parts by weight.
The (C) base oil for engine oil used in the lubricating oil composition according to the present invention is not particularly limited, and known base oils for engine oil can be employed. At least one kind of natural oil or synthetic lubricating oil, or mixtures thereof can be used. Such oils preferably have a viscosity index (VI) of at least 100, more preferably at least 100, and most preferably at least 120.
Examples of such natural oils include animal oils, vegetable oils, oils obtained from petroleum, paraffin type oils, naphtene type oils, hydrocracked VHVI oils and mixtures thereof. Example of synthetic lubricating oils include olefinic polymers and copolymers such as polybutylene, polypropylene, propylene-isobutylene copolymers, polybutylene chloride, poly(1-hexene), poly(1-octene), poly1-decene), etc., polyphenyls such as dodecylbenzene, tetradecylbenzene, biphenyl, terphenyl, alkylphenyl, etc., alkyl diphenyl ethers, diphenyl alkylsulfate and derivatives thereof, and hydrocarbon oils such as analogs and homologs, and halogen-substituted hydrocarbons. Examples further include oils obtained by polymerizing ethylene oxide or propylene oxide, alkyl and aryl ethers of polyoxyalkylene polymers thereof, or mono- or polyvalent carboxylic acid esters or diesters thereof. Diesters obtained from phthalic acid, succinic acid, alkylsuccinic acid and dimers of alkylsuccinic acid, sebacic acid, adipic acid and linolic acid and various alcohols, and polyol esters prepared from polyhydric alcohols, can also be employed. Other :examples include silicic acid type oils such as polyalkylsiloxane oils, polyarylsiloxane oils, polyalkoxysiloxane oils and silicate oils such as polyaryloxysiloxane oils and silicate oils and liquid esters of phosphorus-containing acids such as TCP, TOP, diethylesters of decylsulfonic acid, etc. Preferred among them are hydrocracked VHVI oil and synthetic oils of polybutene. From the aspect of long drain, hydrocracked VHVI oils having high oxidation stability, mixtures of hydrocracked VHVI oil and poly-alpha-olefin and/or polyol esters and mixtures of poly-alpha-olefin and polyol esters are particularly preferred.
Further, the engine oil composition according to the first embodiment of the present invention is aimed at improving the MoDTC residual property at the time of oil degradation by combining (A) MoDTC and (B) ZnDTP containing at least 50 percent by weight of the primary alkyl group having 8 to 14 carbon atoms. When a higher MoDTC residual property is desired, however, an amine type or phenol type anti-oxidant, metal detergent, ashless dispersant, etc., are preferably used in combination.
In the antioxidants, examples of the amine type antioxidants include alkylated diphenylamine, phenyl-alpha-naphtylamine, alkylated-alpha-naphtylamine, etc, and examples of the phenol type antioxidants include 2,6-di-t-butylphenol, 4,4-methylene-bis-(2,6-ditertiarybutylphenol), etc. These antioxidants are generally used in a proportion of 0.05 to 2.0 percent by weight.
Examples of the metallic detergents include phanates, sulfonates, phosphorares, salicylates, etc., of barium (Ba), calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg), as well as perbasic detergents. These detergents are generally used in a proportion of 0.1 to 10 percent by weight.
Examples of the ashless detergent/dispersants include benzylamine, boron derivatives of benzylamine, alkenylsucciniimide, boron derivatives of alkenylsucciniimide, and so forth. These detergent/dispersants are generally used in a proportion of 0.5 to 15 percent by weight.
If it is desired that the MoDTC remain, the conjoint use of the hydrocracked VHVI oil is preferred.
Other known extreme-pressure agents, friction mitigators, wear-proofing agents, viscosity index improving agents, rust-proofing agents, fluidization point lowering agents, defoamants, corrosion inhibitors, etc., such as the wear mitigators, e.g., higher aliphatic acids, higher alcohols, amines, esters, etc, and the extreme-pressure agents, e.g., sulfur type, chlorine type, phosporus type, organometallic type, etc., may be used in combination in ordinary amounts of use, whenever desired, within the range of the object of the present invention.
Next, in the (D) polyglycerin half esters represented by the general formula (3) that are used in the engine oil composition according to the second invention of the present invention, each of R.sup.5 to R.sup.8 represents a hydrogen atom and/or an acyl group having 8 to 20 carbon atoms, but R.sup.5 to R.sup.8 are never simultaneously the hydrogen atom, nor are they simultaneously the acyl group. When n is at least 2, n.cndot.R.sup.8 's exist and in this case, each of such R.sup.8 's may be the hydrogen atom and/or the acyl group and may be the same or different. In this specification, a polyhydric alcohol in which part of the hydroxyl groups in said alcohol are esterified will be called a "half ester". The residue of the acyl group (that is, the residue obtained by removing the carbonyl group from the acyl group) may contain a saturated or unsaturated bond(s), and may be of a straight chain type, a branched chain type, a ring-like type or combinations thereof.
Examples of such acyl groups include straight chain saturated acyl groups such as a lauryl group, myristyl group, palmityl group, stearyl group, etc., branched chain saturated acyl groups such as a 2-ethylhexyl group, isononyl group, isotridecyl group, isostearyl group, etc., mono-saturated acyl groups such as a linderenyl group (4-dodecenyl group), tsuzuyl group (4-tetradecenyl group), physetoleyl group (5-tetradecenyl group), myristoleyl group (9-tetradecenyl group), zoomaryl group (9-hexadecenyl group) petroselyl group (6-octadecenyl group), oleyl group, eleidyl group, gadoleyl group (9-icocenyl group), gondoyl group, etc., poly-unsaturated acyl groups such as a linoleyl group (9, 12-octadecadienyl group), linoelaidyl group, linolenyl group (9, 12, 15-octadecatrienyl group), eleostearyl group (9, 12, 13-octadecatrienyl group), moroctyl group, parinaryl group (9, 11, 13, 15-octadecatetraenyl group), arachidonyl group (5, 8, 11, 14-icosatetraenyl group), etc., acetyleneacyl groups such as a stearolyl group (9-octadecynyl group), isanyl group, xymenyl group, etc., cyclic acyl groups such as a hydrocarpyl group, chaulmoogryl group, sterculyl group, etc., and branched chain acyl groups such as a tuberculostearyl group.
In the (D) polyglycerin half esters used for the engine oil composition according to the second invention of the present invention, the number (Y) of the acyl groups in the polyglycerin half esters (I), (II) or (III) is within the range of 1.ltoreq.Y.ltoreq. (n+5)/2 and preferably, within the range of 1.ltoreq.Y.ltoreq.(n+3)/2. Here, n corresponds to n in the general formula (3). When two or more kinds of half esters are used in combination as the polyglycerin half esters (I), (II) or (III), Y represents the mean number of the acyl groups in these two or more kinds of polyglycerin half esters. The polyglycerin half esters having Y falling within the range described above are most preferred because the proportion of the hydroxyl groups and the acyl groups exhibits the extreme-pressure property. Therefore, where this extreme-pressure property is particularly required, it is advisable to use an engine oil composition containing the polyglycerin half esters (I), (II) or (III) as the essential components.
Further, in the (D) polyglycerin half esters used for the engine oil composition according to the second embodiment of the present invention, the proportion of the lauryl groups and/or the oleyl groups in the total acyl groups is at least 25% in the polyglycerin half esters (II) or (III). In connection with the acyl groups in the polyglycerin half esters, the melting point becomes lower as the degree of unsaturation increases but stability drops, and though the lubrication property becomes better with a greater number of carbon atoms, the crystal precipitates at a low temperature. For these reason, the lauryl group and the oleyl group are preferred. Where a higher extreme-pressure is required than in the case described above, it is preferred to use an engine oil composition comprising the polyglycerin half esters (II) or (III) as the essential constituent components.
In the (D) polyglycerin half esters used for the engine oil composition according to the second invention of the present invention, the acyl groups of the polyglycerin half esters (III) are all oleyl groups and/or lauryl groups. When the polyglycerin half esters are used as the extreme-pressure agent, the oleyl group or the lauryl group is most preferred for the reasons described above. Accordingly, when a greater extreme-pressure polarity is required over the case described above, it is preferred to use an engine oil composition containing the polyglycerin half eaters (III) as the essential constituent components.
In the (D) polyglycerin half esters used for the engine oil composition according to the second embodiment of the present invention, the amount added of the polyglycerin half esters (I), (II) and (III) is from 0.1 to 5 parts by weight based on 100 parts by weight of the base oil for engine oil as the Component (C). Further, it is possible to use, in combination, at least two kinds of those polyglycerin half esters (I), (II) or (III) whose R.sup.5 to R.sup.8 and whose n are different. As to the amount of use in this case, the total amount of the plurality of polyglycerin half esters (I), (II) or (III) used must be within the range described above.
It has been clarified that these (D) polyglycerin half esters have excellent extreme-pressure properties and when they are blended with (A) MoDTC and (B) ZnDTP in a predetermined molar ratio, they exhibit a surprisingly high lubrication property. Concrete examples include diglycerin monolaurate, diglycerin dilaurate, diglycerin trilaurate, diglycerin monooleate, diglycerin dioleate, diglycerin trioleate, diglycerin monolauryl monooleate, diglycerin monolauryl dioleate, diglycerin dilauryl monooleate, tetraglycerin monooleate, tetraglycerin monolaurate, tetraglycerin monooleyl. monostearate, tetraglycerin monolauryl monostearate, hexaglycerin monooleate, hexaglycerin monolaurate, hexaglycerin pentaoleate, hexaglycerin dioleyl distearate, hexaglycerin dioleyl pentastearate, hexaglycerin dilauryl pentastearate, decaglycerin monooleate, decaglycerin monolaurate, decaglycerin pentaolely pentastearate, decaglycerin pentalauryl pentastearate, and so forth. Preferred among them are diglycerin monooleate, diglycerin dioleate, diglycerin tetraoleate, tetraglycerin monooleate, tetraglycerin monolaurate, hexaglycerin monooleate, hexaglycerin monolaurate, hexaglycerin pentaoleate, decaglycerin monooleate, decaglycerin monolaurate, etc.
In an anther aspect of the engine oil composition according to the second embodiment of the present invention, the amounts added of the (A) MoDTC, (B) ZnDTP and (D) polyglycerin half esters �polyglycerin half ester, polyglycerin half esters (I) or polyglycerin half esters (II)! based on parts by weight of (C) base oil for engine oil are as follows:
______________________________________(A) MoDTC 0.03 to 1 part by weight(B) ZnDTP 0.01 to 2 parts by weight(D) polyglycerin half esters 0.1 to 5 parts by weight______________________________________
If the amount of each component added is too low, no effects appear and if too great, no effects exceeding a predetermined level appear and on the contrary, the lubrication property might be adversely affected. To obtain excellent lubrication properties, therefore, these amounts must be essentially satisfied.
Further, when either of the polyglycerin half esters (II) or (III) is used as the polyglycerin half ester in the engine oil composition according to the second invention of the present invention, the amounts added of (A) MoDTC, (B) ZnDTP and (D) polyglycerin half ester (II) or (III) are as follows:
______________________________________(A) MoDTC 0.03 to 1 part by weight(B) ZnDTP 0.01 to 2 parts by weight(D) polyglycerin half ester 0.1 to 5 parts by weight______________________________________
total amount of (A)+(B)+(C)=1 to 7 parts by weight;
proportion of (A):(B):(C)=0.1 to 1.5:1:1 to 10.
Blending of these components is preferably made so as to satisfy the relations described above. Higher lubrication performance can be obtained by using them within this range because these additives for the lubricating oil provide a preferable interaction within this range. Accordingly, when the extreme-pressure property is particularly required, this engine oil composition is preferably used.
Further, various known extreme-pressure agents, friction mitigators, wear-proofing agents, etc., such as the friction mitigators typified by higher fatty acids, higher alcohols, amines, esters, etc., and the extreme-pressure agents typified by sulfur types, chlorine types, phosphorus types, organometallic types, etc., may be used in combination in ordinary amounts of use within the range of the object of the present invention.
Various known additives such as antioxidants typified by phenols and amines, detergents typified by neutral or high basic alkaline earth metal sulfonates, phenates, carboxylates, etc., dispersants such as succiniimide, benzylamines, etc., viscosity index improving agents such as high molecular weight polymethacrylates, polyisobutylene, polystyrene, ethylene-propylene copolymers, styrene-isobutylene copolymers, etc., defoamants such as esters and silicones, and other rust preventives, fluidization point lowering agents, etc., may be suitably added in ordinary amounts of use within the object of the present invention, if necessary.

EXAMPLES
Hereinafter, the present invention will be explained in further detail with reference to Examples thereof, but the invention is not particularly limited thereto.
Example A
The engine oil composition according to the first invention of the present invention was prepared by using each of the following Samples 1 to 17 in the blend proportions described in Table 1, and was subjected to various tests.
Sample 1: Compound represented by the following formula �(A) MoDTC!: ##STR3## (wherein R is a 2-ethylhexyl group, and S/O=2.2) Sample 2: Compound represented by the following formula �(A) MoDTC!: ##STR4## (wherein R is an isotridecyl group, and S/O=1.5) Sample 3: Compound represented by the following formula �(A) MoDTC!: ##STR5## (wherein R is an isotridecyl group and 2-ethylhexyl group, and S/O=2.2 in a molar ratio)
Sample 4: Compound represented by the following formula �(B) ZnDTP!:
Zn�(RO).sub.2 PS.sub.2 !.sub.2 .cndot.aZnO
(wherein R is a primary 2-ethylhexyl group, and a weight ratio of a neutral salt (a=0):basic salt (a=1/3)=55:45)
Sample 5: Compound represented by the following formula �(B) ZnDTP!:
Zn�(RO).sub.2 PS.sub.2 !.sub.2 .cndot.aZnO
(wherein R is a primary octyl group, and a weight ratio of a neutral salt:basic salt=68:32)
Sample 6: Compound represented by the following formula �(B) ZnDTP!:
Zn�(RO).sub.2 PS.sub.2 !.sub.2 .cndot.aZnO
(wherein R is a primary dodecyl group, and a weight ratio of neutral salt:basic salt=62: 38)
Sample 7: Compound represented by the following formula �(B) ZnDTP!:
Zn�(RO).sub.2 PS.sub.2 !.sub.2 .cndot.aZnO
(wherein R is a primary tridecyl group, and a weight ratio of neutral salt:basic salt=85:15)
Sample 8: Compound represented by the following formula �(B) ZnDTP!:
Zn�(RO).sub.2 PS.sub.2 !.sub.2 .cndot.aZnO
(wherein R is a primary tetradecyl group, and a weight ratio of neutral salt:basic salt=86:14)
Sample 9: Compound represented by the following formula �(B) ZnDTP!:
Zn�(RO).sub.2 PS.sub.2 !.sub.2 .cndot.aZnO
(wherein R is a primary hexyl group, and a weight ratio of neutral salt:basic salt=52:48)
Sample 10: Compound represented by the following formula �(B) ZnDTP!:
Zn�(RO).sub.2 PS.sub.2 !.sub.2 .cndot.aZnO
(wherein R is a secondary propyl group or n-hexyl group, and a weight ratio of neutral salt:basic salt=97:3)
Sample 11: Compound represented by the following formula �(B) ZnDTP!:
Zn�(RO).sub.2 PS.sub.2 !.sub.2 .cndot.aZnO
(wherein R is a secondary hexyl group, and a weight ratio of neutral salt:basic salt=97:3)
Sample 12: Phenyl-alpha-naphthylamine
Sample 13: Boric acid derivative of alkenylsucciniimide
Sample 14: �(C) base oil for engine oil!
100 neutral oil (19.9 cSt at 100.degree. C., VI=105)
Sample 15: �(C) base oil for engine oil!
Hydrocracked VHVI oil (18.6 cSt at 100.degree. C., VI=105)
Sample 16: Compound represented by the following formula (MoDTC): ##STR6## (wherein R is an isotridecyl group or 2-ethylhexyl group, and X.dbd.O) Sample 17: Compound represented by the following formula (MoDTC): ##STR7## (wherein R is an isotridecyl group or 2-ethylhexyl group, and X.dbd.S)
TABLE 1__________________________________________________________________________Blending ratio of the engine oil compositions(amount added based on 100 parts by weight of base oil for engineoil) (A) MoDTC (B) ZnDTP (C) Base Oil for Sample Amount Added Sample Amount Added Engine Oil No. Parts by Weight No. Parts by Weight Sample No.__________________________________________________________________________Example 1 1 0.4 4 0.94 15Example 2 1 0.4 5 0.94 15Example 3 1 0.4 6 0.94 15Example 4 1 0.4 7 0.94 15Example 5 1 0.4 8 0.94 15Example 6 2 0.4 4 0.94 15Example 7 2 0.4 5 0.94 15Example 8 2 0.4 6 0.94 15Example 9 2 0.4 7 0.94 15Example 10 2 0.4 8 0.94 15Example 11 3 0.4 4 0.94 15Example 12 3 0.4 5 0.94 15Example 13 3 0.4 6 0.94 15Example 14 3 0.4 7 0.94 15Example 15 3 0.4 8 0.94 15Example 16 1 0.1 4 0.94 15Example 17 1 0.55 4 0.94 15Example 18 1 0.7 4 0.94 15Example 19 1 0.4 4 0.6 15Example 20 1 0.4 4 1.1 15Example 21 1 0.4 4 1.3 15Example 22 1 0.4 4 0.94 16Example 23 2 0.1 4 0.94 15Example 24 2 0.7 4 0.94 15Example 25 2 0.4 4 0.6 15Example 26 2 0.4 4 1.1 15Example 27 2 0.4 4 1.3 15Example 28 2 0.4 4 0.94 16Example 29 3 0.2 4 0.94 15Example 30 3 0.55 4 0.94 15Example 31 3 0.8 4 0.94 15Example 32 3 0.4 4 0.6 15Example 33 3 0.4 4 1.2 15Example 34 3 0.4 4 0.94 16Example 35 1 0.4 4 0.75 15 10 0.19Example 36 1 0.4 4 0.56 15 10 0.38Example 37 1 0.4 4 0.75 15 11 0.19Example 38 1 0.4 4 0.56 15 11 0.38Example 39 1 0.05 4 0.66 15 5 0.28Example 40 1 0.4 7 0.75 15 11 0.19Example 41 1 0.05 4 0.94 15Example 42 1 0.9 4 0.94 15Example 43 1 0.4 4 0.1 15Example 44 1 0.4 4 1.9 15Example 45 1 0.2 4 0.94 15 3 0.2Example 46 1 0.2 4 0.75 15 3 0.2 10 0.19Comp. Example 1 1 0.4 10 0.94 15Comp. Example 2 1 0.4 11 0.94 15Comp. Example 3 1 0.4 4 0.28 15 10 0.66Comp. Example 4 1 0.4 4 0.56 15 11 0.38Comp. Example 5 1 0.4 15Comp. Example 6 4 0.94 15Comp. Example 7 1 0.01 4 0.94 15Comp. Example 8 1 0.4 4 0.005 15Comp. Example 9 1 2.3 4 0.94 15Comp. Example 10 1 0.4 4 3.0 15Comp. Example 11 1 0.4 9 0.94 15__________________________________________________________________________
An engine oil oxidation stability test (ISOT test) was carried out by the following method for each of the engine oil compositions obtained above, and measurement of the amount of sludge, measurement of the residual MoDTC amount by high speed liquid chromatography and measurement of the coefficient of friction by an SRV tester were carried out for the oil after the test. The results are summarized in Table 2.
<Engine Oil Oxidation Stability Test>
The engine oil oxidation stability test was conducted in accordance with JIS K2514 under the following conditions:
______________________________________Condition:______________________________________temperature 165.5.degree. C.speed 1,300 rpm/mintest time 48 hours______________________________________
<Test Measuring Coefficient of Friction>
The test measuring the coefficient of friction was conducted by using an SRV tester under the following conditions:
__________________________________________________________________________Condition:__________________________________________________________________________Line contact: The test was conducted under a cylinder-on-plate line contact condition. An upper cylinder (.phi.15 .times. 22 mm) was perpendicularly set to a plate (.phi.24 .times. 7.85 mm) in a sliding direction and was allowed to reciprocate so as to measure the coefficient of friction. The material of said cylinder and plate was SUJ-2.load: 200Ntemperature: 80.degree. C.measurement time: 15 minutesamplitude: 1 mmcycle: 50 Hz__________________________________________________________________________
TABLE 2__________________________________________________________________________Lubricating test results of the engine oil compositions Coefficient Residual MoDTC of Friction (Mo Content of New New Oil Degraded Oil Oil as 100%) Amount of Sludge__________________________________________________________________________Example 1 0.065 0.045 67 not greater than 0.08 gExample 2 0.065 0.05 65 not greater than 0.08 gExample 3 0.065 0.055 64 not greater than 0.08 gExample 4 0.06 0.055 65 not greater than 0.08 gExample 5 0.065 0.055 63 not greater than 0.08 gExample 6 0.06 0.05 64 not greater than 0.08 gExample 7 0.06 0.05 62 not greater than 0.08 gExample 8 0.06 0.05 62 not greater than 0.08 gExample 9 0.065 0.06 63 not greater than 0.08 gExample 10 0.06 0.055 61 not greater than 0.08 gExample 11 0.06 0.04 70 not greater than 0.08 gExample 12 0.065 0.05 68 not greater than 0.08 gExample 13 0.065 0.055 67 not greater than 0.08 gExample 14 0.06 0.055 69 not greater than 0.08 gExample 15 0.065 0.055 67 not greater than 0.08 gExample 16 0.075 0.075 57 not greater than 0.08 gExample 17 0.065 0.045 67 not greater than 0.08 gExample 18 0.065 0.045 67 0.1 gExample 19 0.065 0.055 55 not greater than 0.08 gExample 20 0.065 0.045 66 not greater than 0.08 gExample 21 0.065 0.05 67 not greater than 0.08 gExample 22 0.065 0.04 71 not greater than 0.08 gExample 23 0.075 0.075 57 not greater than 0.08 gExample 24 0.06 0.05 64 0.1 gExample 25 0.065 0.06 47 not greater than 0.08 gExample 26 0.06 0.055 64 not greater than 0.08 gExample 27 0.065 0.055 64 0.1 gExample 28 0.06 0.045 69 not greater than 0.08 gExample 29 0.07 0.07 65 not greater than 0.08 gExample 30 0.06 0.04 70 not greater than 0.08 gExample 31 0.06 0.04 70 0.1 gExample 32 0.06 0.05 57 not greater than 0.08 gExample 33 0.06 0.045 70 0.1 gExample 34 0.055 0.035 73 not greater than 0.08 gExample 35 0.063 0.06 65 0.15 gExample 36 0.065 0.055 60 0.18 gExample 37 0.065 0.05 65 0.15 gExample 38 0.065 0.05 57 0.18 gExample 39 0.065 0.045 66 0.15 gExample 40 0.06 0.055 64 not greater than 0.08 gExample 41 0.075 0.08 50 not greater than 0.08 gExample 42 0.06 0.045 67 0.1 gExample 43 0.06 0.07 42 not greater than 0.08 gExample 44 0.065 0.055 65 0.1 gExample 45 0.065 0.04 67 not greater than 0.08 gExample 46 0.065 0.05 65 0.15 gComp. Example 1 0.06 0.09 10 0.3 gComp. Example 2 0.06 0.09 9 0.3 gComp. Example 3 0.063 0.135 0 0.25 gComp. Example 4 0.06 0.135 0 0.2 gComp. Example 5 0.055 0.133 29 not greater than 0.08 gComp. Example 6 0.13 0.135 0 not greater than 0.08 gComp. Example 7 0.1 0.135 0 not greater than 0.08 gComp. Example 8 0.06 0.135 32 not greater than 0.08 gComp. Example 9 0.065 0.045 67 0.3 gComp. Example 10 0.065 0.115 67 0.3 gComp. Example 11 0.065 0.09 14 0.1 g__________________________________________________________________________
An antioxidant (Sample 13) and detergent (Sample 14) were added in amounts of 2.0 parts by weight, respectively, to 100 parts by weight of the base oil for the engine oil compositions similar to those of Examples 1, 6 and 11 (Examples 1', 6' and 11'), and similar tests were conducted for each of these engine oil compositions. The results are summarized in Table 3.
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________Amounts added to 100 parts by weight and test resultsCoefficient Residual MoDTC (%)of Friction (Mo amount of newNew Oil Degraded Oil oil as 100%) Sludge Amount__________________________________________________________________________Example 1' 0.065 0.04 70 not greater than 0.08 gExample 6' 0.065 0.045 67 not greater than 0.08 gExample 11' 0.065 0.050 73 not greater than 0.08 g__________________________________________________________________________
<Copper Plate Corrosion Test and Test Measuring Coefficient of Friction>
To conduct the copper plate corrosion test, to 100 parts by weight of Sample 14, 0.4 parts by weight of each of Samples 1, 2, 3, 16 and 17, and 0.04 parts by weight of Sample 4 were dissolved, respectively, and a copper plate was immersed and heated at 100.degree. C. for 3 hours to test the corrosion property to the copper plate (in accordance with ASTM D 130).
The test measuring the coefficient of friction was carried out in the same way as above. The results are summarized in Table 4.
TABLE 4______________________________________ Degree of Copper Plate Coefficient Sample Discoloration of Friction______________________________________Example 47 1 1a 0.06Example 48 2 1a 0.06Example 49 3 1a 0.06Comp. Example 12 16 1a 0.10Comp. Example 13 17 3b 0.06______________________________________
Example B
The engine oil composition according to the second invention of the present invention was prepared by using the same sample as the one used for Example A with the exception of the Samples described below, in the blending proportion summarized in Table 6, and various tests were conducted.
Sample 18: Compound represented by the following formula �(B) ZnDTP!:
Zn�(RO).sub.2 PS.sub.2 !.sub.2 .cndot.aZnO
(wherein R is a primary dodecyl group, and a weight ratio of neutral salt:basic salt=62:38)
Sample 19: Compound represented by the following formula �(B) ZnDTF!:
Zn�(RO).sub.2 PS.sub.2 !.sub.2 .cndot.aZnO
(wherein R is a secondary hexyl group and isopropyl group its ratio is 1/1, and a weight ratio of neutral salt:basic salt=60:40)
Sample 20 to 35: (D) polyglycerin half esters
TABLE 5______________________________________ In general formula (3) R.sup.5 to R.sup.8 Number NumberSample Sample Name x of H of acyl group______________________________________20 Diglycerin monooleate 1 3 oleyl group 121 Hexaglycerin monooleate 5 7 oleyl group 122 Hexaglycerin trioleate 5 5 oleyl group 323 Hexaglycerin dioleate 5 6 oleyl group 224 Hexaglycerin monolaurate 5 7 lauryl group 125 Triglycerin dioleate 2 3 oleyl group 226 Diglycerin dioleate 1 2 oleyl group 227 Decaglycerin monooleate 9 11 oleyl group 128 Hexaglycerin pentaoleate 5 3 oleyl group 529 Decaglycerin monolaurate 9 11 lauryl group 130 Tetraglycerin monooleate 3 5 oleyl group 131 Diglycerin tetraoleate 1 0 oleyl group 432 Diglycerin monooleate 0 oleyl group 133 Glycerin dioleate 0 oleyl group 234 Sorbitan monooleate -- oleyl group 135 Sorbitan dioleate -- oleyl group 2______________________________________
Sample 36: (C) Base oil for engine oil
The base oil for engine oil used was prepared by adding 4 percent by weight of polymethacrylate as a viscosity index improving agent to a 150 neutral oil (5.1 cSt at 100.degree. C.).
The amounts of addition of (A), (B) and (D) shown in Tables 6-1 and 6-2 represent the amounts (parts by weight) based on 100 parts by weight of the base oil for engine oil.
TABLE 6__________________________________________________________________________ (A) MoDTC (B) ZnDTP (D) Amount Amount Amount (A):(B):(D) Total Sample Added Sample Added Sample Added Weight Ratio Amount__________________________________________________________________________Example 47 1 0.4 4 0.9 20 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3Example 48 1 0.4 4 0.9 21 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3Example 49 1 0.4 4 0.9 22 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3Example 50 1 0.4 4 0.9 23 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3Example 51 1 0.4 4 0.9 24 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3Example 52 1 0.4 4 0.9 25 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3Example 53 1 0.4 4 0.9 26 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3Example 54 1 0.4 4 0.9 27 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3Example 55 1 0.4 4 0.9 28 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3Example 56 1 0.4 4 0.9 29 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3Example 57 1 0.4 4 0.9 30 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3Example 58 2 0.4 4 0.9 26 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3Example 59 3 0.4 4 0.9 26 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3Example 60 2 0.4 18 0.9 26 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3Example 61 3 0.4 19 0.9 26 3.0 0.4:1:3.3 3.3Example 62 1 0.1 18 0.9 26 1.0 0.1:1:1.1 2.0Example 63 3 0.9 19 0.9 26 1.0 1:1:1.1 2.8Example 64 1 0.4 4 1.9 26 2.1 0.2:1:1.1 4.4Example 65 1 0.4 4 0.2 26 1.8 2:1:9 2.3Example 66 1 0.4 4 0.9 25 0.5 26 0.5 0.4:1:1.1 2.3Example 67 2 0.45 18 0.3 26 0.3 1.5:1:1 1.05Example 68 3 0.4 4 0.9 26 4.5 0.4:1:5 5.8Example 69 1 0.4 19 0.9 26 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3Example 70 1 0.4 19 0.9 27 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3Example 71 1 0.4 19 0.9 24 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3COMP. 12 4 0.9 26 1.0 --:1:1.1 1.9 13 1 0.4 20 1.0 0.4:--:1.1 1.2 14 1 0.4 4 0.9 0.4:1:-- 1.3 15 1 0.005 4 0.9 21 1.0 0.005:1:1.1 1.905 16 1 0.4 4 0.9 26 0.05 0.5:1:0.08 1.35 17 1 0.4 4 0.9 31 0.1 0.5:1:0.16 1.4 18 1 0.4 4 0.9 32 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3 19 1 0.4 4 0.9 33 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3 20 1 0.4 19 0.9 34 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3 21 1 0.4 19 0.9 32 0.5 33 0.5 0.4:1:1.1 2.3 22 1 0.4 19 0.9 34 0.5 35 0.5 0.4:1:1.1 2.3 23 1 0.4 19 0.9 35 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3 24 1 0.4 4 0.9 31 1.0 0.4:1:1.1 2.3 25 1 0.4 4 0.9 26 8.0 0.4:1:8.9 9.3 26 1 0.1 18 0.9 26 6.0 0.1:1:6.7 7.0__________________________________________________________________________
The seizure test and the measurements of the coefficient of friction were carried out on the engine oil compositions as the products of the present invention and as Comparative Examples, each having the blending ratios shown in Tables 6-1 and 6-2. The results are summarized in Table 7.
<Seizure Test>
The seizure test was conducted by using a Falex tester in accordance with ASTM D 3233. The initial oil temperature was 25.degree. C. and a conditioning operation was carried out at 250 lb.times.5 minutes.
<Measurement of Coefficient of Friction>
The measurement of the coefficient of friction was conducted under the following conditions by using a pendulum tester.
______________________________________Conditions:______________________________________oil temperature: 80.degree. C.number measurements: 50 times______________________________________
The coefficient of friction was a mean value of 50 measurements.
TABLE 7______________________________________Lubricating test result Farex Test: Pendulum Test: Seizure Load Coefficient of Friction______________________________________Example 47 1800 lb 0.092Example 48 1750 lb 0.093Example 49 1750 lb 0.091Example 50 1800 lb 0.092Example 51 1750 lb 0.093Example 52 1800 lb 0.091Example 53 1850 lb 0.091Example 54 1750 lb 0.093Example 55 1750 lb 0.093Example 56 1750 lb 0.093Example 57 1750 lb 0.093Example 58 1850 lb 0.090Example 59 1850 lb 0.091Example 60 1850 lb 0.090Example 61 1800 lb 0.092Example 62 1700 lb 0.095Example 63 1900 lb 0.089Example 64 1750 lb 0.092Example 65 1750 lb 0.092Example 66 1800 lb 0.092Example 67 1800 lb 0.093Example 68 1800 lb 0.092Example 69 1850 lb 0.092Example 70 1750 lb 0.093Example 71 1750 lb 0.093Comp. Example 12 1050 lb 0.285Comp. Example 13 1350 lb 0.230Comp. Example 14 1400 lb 0.230Comp. Example 15 1350 lb 0.280Comp. Example 16 1050 lb 0.230Comp. Example 17 1400 lb 0.240Comp. Example 18 1400 lb 0.230Comp. Example 19 1450 lb 0.210Comp. Example 20 1450 lb 0.200Comp. Example 21 1450 lb 0.180Comp. Example 22 1450 lb 0.180Comp. Example 23 1400 lb 0.210Comp. Example 24 1450 lb 0.230Comp. Example 25 1450 lb 0.250Comp. Example 26 1450 lb 0.230______________________________________
Further, oxidation stability tests were conducted for the engine oil compositions of Examples 47 to 49 and Comparative Examples 12 and 16 by the following method. The results are summarized in Table 8.
<Oxidation Stability Test>
The oxidation stability test was carried out in accordance with JIS K 2514. After each sample oil was degraded by setting the temperature of a thermostat to 165.5.degree. C. and rotating a sample stirring rod at 1,300 rpm to stir for 24 hours, the seizure test was carried out for each oil before and after the test. Similar tests were also carried out for engine oil compositions obtained by only replacing the base oil for the engine oil by a hydrocracked VHVI oil (18.6 cSt at 100.degree. C.) for Examples 47 to 49 and Comparative Examples 12 and 16. These examples are called Examples 47*, 48*, 49* and Comparative Examples 12*, 16*, respectively. The seizure test was carried out under the conditions described above.
TABLE 8______________________________________Lubricating test results Farex Test (Seizure Load) Before ISOT Test After ISOT Test______________________________________Example 47 1800 lb 1300 lbExample 48 1750 lb 1300 lbExample 49 1750 lb 1300 lbExample 47* 1800 lb 1500 lbExample 48* 1750 lb 1500 lbExample 49* 1750 lb 1500 lbComp. Example 12 1050 lb 550 lbComp. Example 16 1050 lb 550 lbComp. Example 12* 1050 lb 850 lbComp. Example 16* 1050 lb 900 lb______________________________________
It became obvious from the results described above that when the base oil for the engine oil was replaced by the hydrocracked VHVI oil, oxidation stability could be improved.
Effects of the Invention
The first embodiment of the present invention provides an engine oil composition which provides low friction and low wear when it is a new oil, and even at the time of oil degradation, has a large residual MoDTC (A) and hence, provides low friction and low wear for a long term.
The second embodiment of the present invention provides an engine oil composition which provides an excellent coefficient of friction from boundary lubricating condition to fluid lubricating condition.

Number	Date	Country	Kind
6-175934	Jul 1994	JPX
6-203503	Aug 1994	JPX

Number	Name	Date
2173117	Johnson	Sep 1939
4175047	Schick et al.	Nov 1979
4178258	Papay et al.	Dec 1979
5160645	Okaniwa et al.	Nov 1992
5207936	Anzai et al.	May 1993
5356547	Arai et al.	Oct 1994
5494608	Kamakura et al.	Feb 1996

Number	Date	Country
62-275198	Nov 1987	JPX
63-178197	Jul 1988	JPX
3-23597	Jan 1991	JPX
5-279688	Oct 1993	JPX
5-311186	Nov 1993	JPX

Engine oil composition

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (2)

PCT Information

US Referenced Citations (7)

Foreign Referenced Citations (5)