The present invention relates to a engine pylon for suspending a turbo engine from the wing of an aircraft.
It is known that aircraft wing engines are suspended from the wings of this aircraft by suspension engine pylons that act as an interface connecting the wings and the engines.
It is also known that the presence of such a suspension engine pylon and of the engine it carries greatly disturbs the aerodynamic stream, particularly over the intrados of said wing. This therefore results in a significant local perturbation to the lift near the engine pylon, this lift suffering a sharp drop on the root side of the wing and an increase on the distal end side thereof.
In addition, this perturbation to the aerodynamic stream forms vortex layers which are shed by the trailing edge of the wing, giving rise to an important induced drag.
It is an object of the present invention to overcome these disadvantages.
To this end, according to the invention, the engine pylon for suspending a turbo engine from the wing of an aircraft, said turbo engine having a vertical mid-plane passing through its longitudinal axis and said engine pylon comprising two lateral faces, of which one is directed toward the root of said wing and the other toward the distal end thereof, said lateral faces converging to form a trailing edge at the rear of said engine pylon, and the lower part of said rear of the engine pylon supporting the hot stream nozzle of said turbo engine such that said lower part of the rear of the engine pylon is swept by the cold stream of this turbo engine, is noteworthy in that at least said lower part of the rear of the engine pylon is curved toward the root of said wing so that at least the trailing edge of said lower part is shifted toward said root with respect to said vertical mid-plane.
Thus it is possible to deflect the aerodynamic stream of the cold stream from the turbo engine sweeping at least over the lower part of the rear of the engine pylon. This deflection generates, on the one hand, an increase in pressure on the side of the lateral face directed toward the root, making it possible to increase the local lift and thus compensate for the sharp drop in lift caused by the presence of the engine pylon and, on the other hand, a reduced pressure of the side of the lateral face directed toward the distal end, making it possible appreciably to reduce the local lift and therefore compensate for the increase in lift caused by the presence of the engine pylon.
Furthermore, modifying the local pressures on the intrados in the vicinity of the two lateral faces of the engine pylon leads to a transverse shift in the cold stream of the turbo engine. This stream moves away from the intrados on the side of the lateral face directed toward the root, but moves closer to the intrados on the side of the lateral face directed toward the distal end. Such a transverse shift in the cold stream of the turbostream engine accentuates the local overpressure and depression generated by the curvature of the engine pylon, thus further correcting the lift in the vicinity of the lateral faces of the engine pylon.
In addition, such lift compensation reduces the induced drag of the wing, making it possible to increase the payload of the aircraft by several tens of kilos to several hundred kilos (depending on the nature of the aircraft) for the same fuel consumption.
For preference, all of the rear of the engine pylon is curved toward said root so that all of said trailing edge of said engine pylon is shifted toward said root.
Thus, the aerodynamic stream contained between the intrados and the engine casing at the lateral faces of the engine pylon is also deflected, thus further compensating for local lift near the engine pylon.
The rear of the engine pylon may be entirely fixed. However, as an alternative, at least said lower part of the rear of said engine pylon consists of a mobile trailing edge flap such that it can reversibly occupy at least one of the following two positions:
Thus, the inclination of the flap may be variable and depend on the aircraft flight and loading conditions.
For preference, at least in the region of the lower part of the rear of the engine pylon, said lateral face directed toward said root is concave. However, the latter lateral face may be at least substantially planar, or even convex.
If the two lateral faces of the engine pylon are convex, the convex nature of said lateral face directed toward said distal end is more pronounced than the convex nature of said lateral face directed toward said root.
The figures of the attached drawing will make it easy to understand how the invention may be embodied. In these figures, identical references denote elements that are similar.
The aircraft AC, shown in
In the usual way, as shown by
As shown by the curve C1 in dotted line in
In the embodiment of the invention that is shown by
In the example depicted, said lateral faces 12a and 13a are respectively concave and convex over the entire height of the engine pylon, so that the whole of the trailing edge 11a of the engine pylon 3a is shifted toward the root 9, with respect to the vertical mid-plane M-M.
Of course, as will be understood by what follows, just that part of the trailing edge 11a that corresponds to the lower part 14aI of the rear 14a of the engine pylon 3a and which is swept by the hot stream 6 could, according to the invention, be shifted toward the root 9.
Such at least partial shift of the trailing edge 11a generates a local overpressure symbolized by the + in
Thus, by virtue of the present invention and as shown by curve C2 in
As shown by
Furthermore, the concave lateral face 12a directed toward the root 9 (
Furthermore, as an alternative, as illustrated by
The mobile flap 16 may thus reversibly occupy at least one of the following two positions:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08 04831 | Sep 2008 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2995320 | Gottschalk | Aug 1961 | A |
4449683 | Gratzer et al. | May 1984 | A |
4540143 | Wang et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4637573 | Perin et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
7721999 | Voogt | May 2010 | B2 |
20050274846 | Dun | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070284477 | Guering | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080067292 | Bonnaud et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090032639 | Dantin et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20110248116 | Diochon et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 899 201 | Oct 2007 | FR |
2 200 878 | Aug 1988 | GB |
9517334 | Jun 1995 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100051744 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |