1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to an engineered flexure component used at the bolted interfaces of precision optical instruments.
2. Description of the Prior Art
For precision structures, such as telescopes, it is important to understand the sources of mechanical hysteresis, which is defined as the dependence of the strain of a material not only on the instantaneous value of the stress, but also on the previous history of the stress. It is known that whenever two structural elements are bolted together, friction exists at the bolted interface. Bolted interfaces are a source of both damping and instability. Friction may be the cause of energy dissipation as the two surfaces slide past one another as well as cause the two mating surfaces to slide and stop in a new position relative to each other. At present, interface designers cannot explicitly control the percentages of forces that act across an interface through friction. Currently, many optic mounts for precision optical instruments are bolted directly to an optical bench. In a high vibration environment, the optic mounts tend to react to external forces and reposition themselves, thus causing the optical instrument to shift their position. Given the foregoing, there is a need for an engineered flexure component that is sufficiently flexible enough to bend and not slide as the mating surfaces of the bolted interface move relative to each other.
A bolt flange is provided with parallel grooves across its surface. One bolt flange surface has grooves that run in a vertical direction, while a second bolt flange surface has grooves that run in a horizontal direction, such that they are perpendicular to the grooves of the first bolt flange mating surface. The purpose of the grooves is to create a surface that consists of flexures. These flexures cause two effects to occur at the bolted interface. First, for a given clamping force, the resulting surface pressure is greater because of the smaller contact area at the interface which in turn increases the friction force. Second, the flexures are sufficiently flexible enough to bend and not slide as the two interface surfaces move relative to each other. The flexure points may different configurations, i.e. squares, circles, triangles, or other geometric shapes. The designer can choose the type of flexure configuration that satisfies the calculated flexure bending stiffness to minimize transfer of structural forces through friction at the interface and the volume that the interface can satisfy. The grooving of the surfaces allows a designer of optical instruments to be capable of determining the stiffness of the resulting flexure as well as control the percentages of forces that are transferred across an interface through friction as compared with elastic bending.
The flexured interface also allows the designer to invoke load path management design rules. In summary, load path management is a process by which a designer can control the effect of friction by not affecting the frictional mechanisms, but by changing the elastic stiffness that surrounds the frictional element. Placing grooves or two dimensional flexures in the interface mating surfaces enables a designer to model the interface stiffness as a series of bending longitudinal beams, which in turn allows the designer to explicitly model the percentage of force that acts through friction via load path management design rules. A relationship between the physical design of the flexures and engineering practice can be found at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Paper No.: TM-2000-210089 entitled “Design of Mechanisms for Deployable, Optical Instruments: Guidelines for Reducing Hysteresis” dated March, 2000 which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Referring to the drawings, and in particular,
The purpose of grooves 110 is to create a flexure 115. Flexures 115 cause two effects to occur at a bolted interface. First, for a given clamping force, the resulting surface pressure is greater because of the smaller contact area at the interface which in turn increases the Coulombic friction force. Second, flexures 115 provide additional flexibility such that the percentage of force transmitted across the interface is reduced. The width and height of flexures 115 is determined by the flexure bending stiffness, flexure axial stiffness, flexure tortional stiffness, flexure buckling limit and load path management design rules.
Load path management theory states that it is possible to reduce or tailor the effect of interface friction by affecting the elastic mechanisms that surround the friction element. Due to the dependency that hysteresis has on the relative magnitudes of stiffness at an interface, load path management states that it is possible to reduce the dissipation due to friction at an interface not by affecting the friction mechanism, but by changing the relative magnitudes of stiffness at a mating interface. At any interface between two mating bodies, it has been observed that there are at least three stiffness that are managed or a normal contact stiffness that is the compression stiffness in the direction of contact, a contact shear stiffness that is perpendicular in the direction of the contact and a global stiffness of both elastic bodies that are in contact with each other. This can be achieved by changing the design of the interface by changing the ratio of contact normal stiffness to shear stiffness and global stiffness to shear stiffness to increase the percentage of load transferred through internal elastic mechanisms.
When force is transferred across a physical interface, normal and tangential stresses and local deformations occur at the interface. When load transfer occurs through normal stresses at the interface, the load path is elastic, i.e. conservative. When load transfer occurs through shear stress at the interface, friction must be present and thus slippage can occur. When load transfer occurs across friction interfaces, it is considered non-conservative. This force transfer is shown in the interface model of
Using a loss factor analysis, it is shown that if displacement-dependent friction exists in the model shown in
A bolt flange is provided with parallel grooves across its surface. One bolt flange surface has grooves that run in a vertical direction, while a second bolt flange surface has grooves that run in a horizontal direction, such that they are perpendicular to the grooves of the first bolt flange mating surface. The purpose of the grooves is to create a surface that consists of flexures. These flexures cause two effects to occur at the bolted interface. First, for a given clamping force, the resulting surface is greater because of the smaller contact area at the interface which in turn increases the friction force. Second, the flexures are sufficiently flexible enough to bend and not slide as the two interface surfaces move relative to each other. The flexure points may different configurations, i.e. squares, circles, triangles, or other geometric shapes. The grooving of the surfaces allows a designer of optical instruments to be capable of determining the stiffness of the resulting flexure as well as control the percentages of forces that are transferred across an interface through friction as compared with elastic bending. The flexured interface also allows the designer to invoke load path management design rules. In summary, load path management is a process by which a designer can control the effect of friction by not effecting the frictional mechanisms, but by changing the elastic stiffness that surrounds the frictional element. Placing grooves in the interface mating surfaces enables a designer to model the interface stiffness as a series of bending beams, which in turn allows the designer to explicitly model the percentage of force that acts through friction.
Referring now to
Most preferably, the first component 120 has a very unexpected benefit because the first component having the elastic component 122 manages a shear force acting through friction mechanisms when the first component is rested or in contact with a another component.
In the prior art it is known that to improve dimensional stability or a position from one prior art component to another one would increase a clamping force between a first prior component and a second prior art component. The prior art mistakenly believes that this increase in a clamping force improve dimensional stability between two components.
However, the inventor of the present invention recognizes that the increase in the clamping or force between the first prior art component and the second prior art component did nothing to reduce, or otherwise manage shear forces acting through friction mechanisms. It has been observed that shear forces acting through friction mechanisms cause instability between two contacting components. The inventor recognized and discovered that contrary to the prior art that to improve dimensional stability or the relative position between two components, it is necessary to manage shear forces acting through friction mechanisms as discussed in Lake, et al., National Aeronautics and Space Administration Paper No.: TM-2000-210089, Langley Research Center, Hampton Va., entitled “Design of Mechanisms for Deployable, Optical Instruments: Guidelines for Reducing Hysteresis” dated March, 2000 which was previously incorporated by reference in its entirety. Thus, the first component 120 of the present invention preferably maintains positional stability by managing at least a percentage of shear forces acting through friction mechanisms.
In this preferred embodiment, the number of flexures 126 of the first component 120 preferably changes or modulates a local shear by a stiffness of a portion the first component contacting a second component. This modulating or a change in the stiffness at the interface assists with transferring a load. This load is transferred using an internal elastic mechanism in or on the first component 120. Thus, the number of flexures 126 permit the first component 120 to maintain stability relative to another component in a very advantageous manner contrary to the teachings of the prior art.
This first component 120 has an unexpected advantage in the art, as most solutions teach away from this solution or to simply increasing the clamping force and hold the two components together more tightly. The number of flexures 126 preferably reduce hysteresis by providing an elastic and reversible mechanism. The flexures 126 allow the first component 120 to remain stable or in position relative to the second or flat contacting component. In this preferred embodiment, the second component is a flat surface or a second flat component.
Referring now again to
Additionally, the first component 120 may or may not be formed with any aperture 128, or any bolted flange 130. The aperture 128 and any bolted flange 130 shown in
The first component 120 preferably in one non-limiting embodiment is made into a orthogonal shaped member as shown. However, the first component 120 may be made to have any shape known in the art for use with high precision optical instruments or any other instrument that requires positional stability between two components. [Please verify]. A side 132 of the first component 120 being opposite the first side 24 with the number flexures 126 is shown as flat. This flat side 132 preferably is to assist with the high precision device (not shown) being connected or secured thereto in a stable and easy manner, however the first component is not limited to this arrangement. The side 132 may have any suitable geometry known in the art.
The first component 120 preferably also has a thickness that may be any thickness known in the art so as to maintain the structural integrity of the first component and to add resiliency to the first component for repeated usage. The thickness is any suitable thickness so as to prevent bending of the support structure for a given set of operational forces that would cause the flexures to no longer be in contact with each other in one preferred embodiment.
Some or all of the flexures 126 of the first component 120 are elastic. The flexures 126 of the first component 120 preferably has a predetermined elasticity or flexibility to manage the shear forces attributed to friction between the first component and the second flat component. The predetermined flexibility reduces a force transmitted from the friction across the interface when the first component 120 contacts the second component.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the flexures 126 are readily separable from the second flat component. One skilled in the art should appreciate that the global stiffness characteristics of each of the first component 120 and the second contacting component are not changed.
Referring now to
In another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the first component 120 shown in
This embodiment is especially beneficial for retro-fitting a bolted interfaces in order to get better stability at the interface. In this preferred embodiment, in an existing optics bench a position will be selected. Preferably, the position is a flat, non-grooved surface depending on the application. A preselected surface of the optics mount can then be grooved. The grooves may be made in any orientation that is complementary to the first component 120 to improve positional stability. Preferably, the second grooves formed in the optics bench or flat surface are about ten to about twenty millimeters in depth. The second grooves may be perpendicular or parallel to the orientation of the flexures 126 of the first component 120, or alternatively may be formed as one or more nubs as shown in
The present invention having been described with particular reference to the preferred forms thereof, it will be obvious that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
This patent application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/323,460 filed on Dec. 18, 2002.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10323460 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 11086972 | Mar 2005 | US |