Engineered in situ anaerobic reactive zones

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6143177
  • Patent Number
    6,143,177
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 21, 1998
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 7, 2000
    23 years ago
Abstract
An in situ method and system for reductive dechlorination, the precipitation of chromium, the precipitation of heavy metals, and microbial denitrification. The invention comprises the formation of in situ anaerobic reactive zones to precipitate and filter out dissolved heavy metals as metallic sulfides, to degrade nitrate to nitrogen gas, to reduce chlorinated hydrocarbons to ethene, and to precipitate and filter out chromium. The invention is comprised of an injection well or wells that extend into a contaminated saturated zone. A conduit located within the injection well conveys carbohydrates and sulfates to the contaminated saturated zone. Microbes digest the carbohydrates to produce sulfate reducing and methanogenic conditions within the reactive zone that include a dissolved oxygen level less than about 0.5 mg/l, a redox potential less than about -250 mv, and a dissolved organic carbon to contaminant ratio of greater than about 50:1. These biogeochemical conditions lead to the reduction of PCE to TCE to DCE to VC and eventually to ethene. These biogeochemical conditions also lead to the precipitation of heavy metals, the precipitation of chromium, and microbial denitrification.
Description

BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to a method and apparatus for removing contaminants dissolved in groundwater and, more particularly, to in situ anaerobic reactive zones for removing contaminants dissolved in groundwater.
Contamination of groundwater with potentially hazardous materials is a common problem facing industry, the government, and the general public. Frequently, as a result of spills, leakage from storage facilities, or surface discharges, contaminants percolate into groundwater, thereby posing a threat to drinking water supplies. While groundwater is not as susceptible to pollution as surface water, once polluted, its restoration is difficult and long term. Various methods for withdrawing and treating contaminated groundwater have met with limited success. Typically, groundwater is removed from the saturated zone, treated, and then returned to the saturated zone. These known methods involve great expense and incur risks inherent in treating heavy metals and other contaminants, such as nitrates, present in the sub-surface.
Preferred embodiments of the method and apparatus of the present invention utilize the principle of in situ anaerobic reactive zones for the precipitation of metals, microbial denitrification, reductive dechlorination, and/or the precipitation of chromium. Precipitation is a process of producing a separable solid phase within a liquid medium. The method may involve installing injection wells into the saturated zone of contaminated soil. A substantially impervious well casing may be placed in the borehole with a fluid-permeable section at its base.
In one preferred method of the present invention, a sufficient amount of carbohydrates and sulfates may be metered into the conduit under pressure to facilitate proper mixing and dispersion in the saturated zone to achieve desired sulfate reducing and methanogenic conditions. The present invention may utilize molasses extract to introduce both carbohydrates and sulfates instead of injecting carbohydrates and sulfates separately via two injection streams. A mixing pump at the base of the conduit may be utilized to provide a more homogeneous mixture within the conduit. The mixture may then permeate through the fluid-permeable screen of the conduit at its base and mix with the surrounding groundwater.
Heterotrophic, sulfate reducing, and denitrifying microorganisms indigenous to the soil microflora may then serve as catalysts for the precipitation of metals, microbial denitrification, reductive dechlorination, and the precipitation of chromium. Two reactions involving microbes may form part of some methods of the present invention. One reaction utilizes the carbohydrates and the dissolved oxygen in the groundwater to form carbon dioxide and water. The result of this reaction causes a depletion in the oxygen level and leads to the formation of substantially anaerobic conditions in the saturated zone. In particular, this reaction preferably reduces the level of dissolved oxygen in the zone being treated to less than about 0.5 mg/l. Furthermore, this reaction preferably creates biogeochemical conditions in the zone being treated that include a redox potential of less than about -250 mv and a dissolved organic carbon to contaminant ratio of greater than about 50:1.
Under the sulfate reducing and methanogenic conditions, the sulfates present may be reduced to form sulfide ions. The sulfide ions may then react with the dissolved heavy metals to form a solid precipitate which eventually is filtered out by the soil matrix. There is no need to remove the precipitate from the soil matrix because it is insoluble and harmless.
As an example, the following reactions are indicative of the process utilizing sugar with sulfate to precipitate dissolved lead, zinc, mercury, and nickel from groundwater: ##EQU1##
In addition to the precipitation of metals, the aforementioned sulfate reducing and methanogenic conditions caused by the injection of carbohydrates and sulfates lead to the reduction of chlorinated hydrocarbons. Chlorinated hydrocarbons include tetrachloroethylene (PCE), trichloroethylene (TCE), dichloroethylene (DCE), and vinyl chloride (VC). Each of these chlorinated hydrocarbons can contaminate the groundwater supply. For example, exposure to high levels of PCE and TCE may cause harm to the nervous system, the liver, the kidney, or even death, and VC may be a common and highly carcinogenic groundwater contaminant.
As shown below, the injection of carbohydrates and sulfates into the saturated zone leads to the reduction of PCE to TCE to DCE to VC and eventually to ethene, a harmless, inert gas. The ethene may eventually be stripped into the soil gas. As a result, a preferred method of the present invention removes dissolved PCE, TCE, DCE, and VC contamination from the groundwater. ##STR1##
In addition, the injection of carbohydrates and sulfates to achieve the aforementioned biogeochemical conditions in the saturated zone leads to the precipitation of chromium, another harmful contaminant. In particular, the injection of carbohydrates and sulfates leads to the reduction of hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium. Trivalent chromium is then precipitated as chromic hydroxide.
Cr.sup.6+ .fwdarw.Cr.sup.3+
Cr.sup.3+ +3OH.fwdarw.Cr(OH).sub.3
The use of molasses extract to achieve each of the above reactions is a unique application. The precipitation of metals and reductive dechlorination in an in situ reactive zone rather than in an above ground aqueous phase reactor is also a unique development. The hydrogeological manipulations used in this invention to cause a homogeneous in situ reactive zone in all three dimensions is also unique. Using the soil matrix itself to filter out the insoluble metal precipitates and the inert gas is also unique.
The in situ reactive zone concept can also be applied to microbially denitrify the dissolved nitrates (NO.sub.3.sup.-) to nitrogen gas. The technologies used today to decontaminate dissolved NO.sub.3.sup.- in groundwater involve pumping the contaminated groundwater and using above ground technologies, such as ion exchange beds, reverse osmosis, or anaerobic bioreactors. In this invention, the injection of carbohydrates will create an anaerobic zone due to the depletion of the dissolved oxygen. The carbohydrates may be injected in the form of molasses. In the saturated zone, the denitrifying microbial consortia will degrade the NO.sub.3.sup.- ion first to a nitrite ion (NO.sub.2.sup.-) and eventually nitrogen (N.sub.2) gas. The nitrogen gas, thus formed, will be eventually stripped into the soil gas. As a result, the dissolved nitrate contamination may be removed from the groundwater.
C.sub.6 H.sub.12 O.sub.6 +6O.sub.2 .fwdarw.6CO.sub.2 +6H.sub.2 O
NO.sub.3.sup.- .fwdarw.NO.sub.2.sup.- .fwdarw.N.sub.2 .uparw.
The present invention may be practiced utilizing single injection wells or in multiple clusters depending upon the depth of the saturated zone, the geology of the remediation site, and the degree of mixing that may be created by each individual injection well. It should be recognized that required microbial cultures may be added to the soil matrix. This may be required where the indigenous microbes are not present in sufficient numbers to initiate the reactions.
In addition to the novel features and advantages mentioned above, other objects and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent from the following descriptions of the drawings and preferred embodiments.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a plan view of a preferred embodiment of the present invention; and
FIG. 2 is a cross sectional view of another embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)
The present invention is directed to a method and apparatus for achieving the precipitation of metals, microbial denitrification, reductive dechlorination, and/or the precipitation of chromium. FIG. 1 shows a plan view of a preferred embodiment of the present invention in operation at 1 to remediate the contaminant plume 2 consisting of dissolved metals, chlorinated hydrocarbons, or dissolved nitrates. Injection wells 3 are installed to extend below the water table. In situ reactive zones 4 may be created by injecting molasses extract in the case of dissolved metals and chlorinated hydrocarbons and by injecting carbohydrates in the case of nitrates.
FIG. 2 shows a cross sectional view of another embodiment of the present invention in operation at 5 to remediate a dissolved contaminant plume. Injection wells 6 are installed to extend below the water table 7, and screens 8 or other similar permeable sections are installed in the contaminated zone 9. The wells include impermeable well sections 10 and the screens 8.
A metering pump 11 is operationally attached in communication with the injection wells 6 at 12. Optionally, mixing pump 13 may be placed within the wells 6 to facilitate mixing of the injected reagents. Reagent stock solution may be held in a holding tank 14.
Operation of the present invention may also be understood with reference to FIG. 2. Metering pump 11 may be operated to provide molasses extract (for metals precipitation and reductive dechlorination) and carbohydrates (for nitrate removal) below the water table 7 under pressure. This is to facilitate the reagents to be injected under pressure to form the in situ reactive zones 15 in a homogeneous manner in all three dimensions. If the reagents are fed by gravity alone into the injection wells 6, a two-dimensional reactive zone may only be formed around the top near the water table 7. Mixing pump 13 may be operated to mix the reagents as is shown by the counter-clockwise arrows within the conduit.
The indigenous microbes may then digest the carbohydrates utilizing the available dissolved oxygen within the reactive zones 15 to produce carbon dioxide and water, thereby forming anaerobic conditions within the reactive zones 15. The sulfates are then metabolized and converted to sulfide (S.sup.2-) within these anaerobic reactive zones 15. These sulfide ions then combine with the dissolved heavy metal (Me.sup.++) ions that contaminate the groundwater to form metallic sulfide precipitates out of the groundwater. The soil matrix within and down gradient of the reactive zone may then filter the precipitates and bind them with the soil matrix.
Me.sup.++ S.sup.-- .fwdarw.MeS.dwnarw.
The injection of molasses extract creates sulfate reducing and methanogenic conditions which preferably include a level of dissolved oxygen less than about 0.5 mg/l, a redox potential less than about -250 mv, and a dissolved organic carbon to contaminant ratio of greater than about 50:1. As a result, the injection of molasses leads to the reduction of PCE to TCE to DCE to VC and eventually to ethene, a harmless, inert gas. In addition, the injection of molasses extract leads to the reduction of hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium which is then precipitated as chromic hydroxide.
In the case of NO.sub.3.sup.- contaminated plumes, the indigenous microbes will digest the carbohydrates utilizing the available dissolved oxygen within the reactive zones 15 to form CO.sub.2 and H.sub.2 O. Under these anaerobic conditions, the nitrates present in the reactive zones 15 will be converted to NO.sub.2.sup.- (nitrite) and then to nitrogen gas by the indigenous denitrifying microbes.
NO.sub.3.sup.- .fwdarw.NO.sub.2.sup.- .fwdarw.N.sub.2
The preferred embodiments herein disclosed are not intended to be exhaustive or to unnecessarily limit the scope of the invention. The preferred embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain the principles of the present invention so that others skilled in the art may practice the invention. Having shown and described preferred embodiments of the present invention, those skilled in the art will realize that many variations and modifications may be made to affect the described invention. Many of those variations and modifications will provide the same result and fall within the spirit of the claimed invention. It is the intention, therefore, to limit the invention only as indicated by the scope of the claims.
Claims
  • 1. A method for removing contaminants dissolved in groundwater, said method comprising the steps of:
  • providing at least one injection well extending from the ground surface to a contaminated saturated zone;
  • supplying carbohydrates and sulfates to said at least one injection well such that said carbohydrates and sulfates are introduced into said contaminated saturated zone, whereby microorganisms in said contaminated saturated zone metabolize said carbohydrates creating sulfate reducing and methanogenic conditions; and
  • maintaining said sulfate reducing and methanogenic conditions for a sufficient period of time such that chlorinated hydrocarbons present in said contaminated saturated zone are reduced to ethene.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein said sulfate reducing and methanogenic conditions further lead to the reduction of hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium which is eventually precipitated as chromic hydroxide.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein said sulfate reducing and methanogenic conditions further lead to the precipitation of metal compounds.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein said sulfate reducing and methanogenic conditions further lead to microbial denitrification.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein said microorganisms are catalysts of the reduction of PCE to TCE to DCE to VC and eventually to ethene.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein, under said sulfate reducing and methanogenic conditions, said microorganisms are catalysts for the reduction of hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium which is eventually precipitated as chromic hydroxide.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein, under said sulfate reducing and methanogenic conditions, said microorganisms are catalysts for the precipitation of metal compounds.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 wherein, under said sulfate reducing and methanogenic conditions, said microorganisms are catalysts of microbial denitrification.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 wherein said microorganisms are adapted to metabolize said carbohydrates and said sulfates to produce sulfide ions.
  • 10. The method of claim 9 wherein said microorganisms are catalysts of the reduction of PCE to TCE to DCE to VC and eventually to ethene.
  • 11. The method of claim 9 wherein, under said sulfate reducing and methanogenic conditions, said microorganisms are catalysts of the reduction of hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium which is eventually precipitated as chromic hydroxide.
  • 12. The method of claim 9 wherein, under said sulfate reducing and methanogenic conditions, said microorganisms are catalysts of the precipitation of metal compounds.
  • 13. The method of claim 9 wherein, under said sulfate reducing and methanogenic conditions, said microorganisms are catalysts of microbial denitrification.
  • 14. The method of claim 1 wherein at least a portion of said microorganisms are supplied to said contaminated saturated zone.
  • 15. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of supplying said carbohydrates and said sulfates comprises:
  • placing a pump in fluid communication with said at least one injection well; and
  • operating said pump to force said carbohydrates and said sulfates into said contaminated saturation zone.
  • 16. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of mixing said carbohydrates and said sulfates in said injection well.
  • 17. The method of claim 1 wherein the steps of supplying said carbohydrates and said sulfates comprises the step of supplying molasses extract to said conduit.
  • 18. The method of claim 1 further comprising:
  • placing a conduit within said at least one injection well, said conduit having a fluid-permeable section below the water table of said contaminated saturated zone;
  • wherein said carbohydrates and sulfates are forced out of said fluid-permeable section into said contaminated saturated zone.
  • 19. The method of claim 18 wherein said carbohydrates and sulfates are supplied under pressure to said conduit, such that said carbohydrates and sulfates are forcibly expelled from said fluid-permeable section, thereby flowing outwardly from said at least one injection well with the natural flow of groundwater and creating a three-dimensional reactive zone within said contaminated saturated zone.
  • 20. A method for removing contaminants dissolved in groundwater, said method comprising the steps of:
  • providing an injection well from the ground surface to a contaminated saturated zone; and
  • supplying carbohydrates and sulfates to said injection well such that said carbohydrates and sulfates are introduced into said contaminated saturated zone;
  • wherein microorganisms in said contaminated saturated zone metabolize said carbohydrates creating anaerobic conditions which lead to the reduction of hexavalent chromium or trivalent chromium and eventually the precipitation of chromic hydroxide.
  • 21. The method of claim 20 further comprising:
  • placing a conduit within said injection well, said conduit having a fluid-permeable section below the water table of said contaminated saturated zone;
  • wherein said carbohydrates and sulfates are forced out of said fluid-permeable section into said contaminated saturated zone.
  • 22. A method for removing contaminants dissolved in groundwater, said method comprising the steps of:
  • providing an injection well from the ground surface to a contaminated saturated zone; and
  • supplying carbohydrates and sulfates to said injection well such that said carbohydrates and sulfates are introduced into said contaminated saturated zone;
  • wherein microorganisms in said contaminated saturated zone metabolize said carbohydrates creating anaerobic conditions which lead to the precipitation of metal compounds.
  • 23. The method of claim 22 further comprising:
  • placing a conduit within said injection well, said conduit having a fluid-permeable section below the water table of said contaminated saturated zone;
  • wherein said carbohydrates and sulfates are forced out of said fluid-permeable section into said contaminated saturated zone.
  • 24. A method for removing contaminants dissolved in groundwater, said method comprising the steps of:
  • providing an injection well from the ground surface to a contaminated saturated zone; and
  • supplying carbohydrates and sulfates to said injection well such that said carbohydrates and sulfates are introduced into said contaminated saturated zone;
  • wherein microorganisms in said contaminated saturated zone are catalysts for the creation of anaerobic conditions which lead to the reduction of hexavalent chromium or trivalent chromium and eventually the precipitation of chromic hydroxide.
  • 25. The method of claim 24 further comprising:
  • placing a conduit within said injection well, said conduit having a fluid-permeable section below the water table of said contaminated saturated zone;
  • wherein said carbohydrates and sulfates are forced out of said fluid-permeable section into said contaminated saturated zone.
  • 26. A method for removing contaminants dissolved in groundwater, said method comprising the steps of:
  • providing an injection well from the ground surface to a contaminated saturated zone; and
  • supplying carbohydrates and sulfates to said injection well such that said carbohydrates and sulfates are introduced into said contaminated saturated zone;
  • wherein microorganisms in said contaminated saturated zone are catalysts for the creation of anaerobic conditions which lead to the precipitation of metal compounds.
  • 27. The method of claim 26 further comprising:
  • placing a conduit within said injection well, said conduit having a fluid-permeable section below the water table of said contaminated saturated zone;
  • wherein said carbohydrates and sulfates are forced out of said fluid-permeable section into said contaminated saturated zone.
  • 28. A method for removing contaminants dissolved in groundwater, said method comprising the steps of:
  • providing an injection well from the ground surface to a contaminated saturated zone; and
  • supplying carbohydrates and sulfates to said injection well such that said carbohydrates and sulfates are introduced into said contaminated saturated zone;
  • wherein microorganisms in said contaminated saturated zone are adapted to metabolize said carbohydrates and said sulfates to produce sulfide ions, said microorganisms thereby serving as catalysts for the reduction of hexavalent chromium or trivalent chromium and eventually the precipitation of chromic hydroxide.
  • 29. The method of claim 28 further comprising:
  • placing a conduit within said injection well, said conduit having a fluid-permeable section below the water table of said contaminated saturated zone;
  • wherein said carbohydrates and sulfates are forced out of said fluid-permeable section into said contaminated saturated zone.
  • 30. A method for removing contaminants dissolved in groundwater, said method comprising the steps of:
  • providing an injection well from the ground surface to a contaminated saturated zone; and
  • supplying carbohydrates and sulfates to said injection well such that said carbohydrates and sulfates are introduced into said contaminated saturated zone;
  • wherein microorganisms in said contaminated saturated zone are adapted to metabolize said carbohydrates and said sulfates to produce sulfide ions, said microorganisms thereby serving as catalysts for the precipitation of metal compounds.
  • 31. The method of claim 30 further comprising:
  • placing a conduit within said injection well, said conduit having a fluid-permeable section below the water table of said contaminated saturated zone;
  • wherein said carbohydrates and sulfates are forced out of said fluid-permeable section into said contaminated saturated zone.
Parent Case Info

This is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/951,219, filed Sep. 15, 1997, now abandoned. U.S. application Ser. No. 08/951,219 is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/661,621, filed Jun. 11, 1996, now abandoned. U.S. application Ser. No. 08/661,621 was a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/420,234, filed Apr. 11, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,554,290.

US Referenced Citations (148)
Number Name Date Kind
RE33102 Visser et al. Oct 1989
825745 Mitchell Jul 1906
1286666 Layne Dec 1918
1877915 Lewis Sep 1932
2104327 Kotzebue Jan 1938
2180400 Coberly Nov 1939
2523091 Bruce Sep 1950
2635696 Asketh Apr 1953
2765850 Allen Oct 1956
2875831 Martin et al. Mar 1959
2969226 Huntington Jan 1961
3216905 Baptist Nov 1965
3277962 Flickinger et al. Oct 1966
3351132 Dougan et al. Nov 1967
3547190 Wilkerson Dec 1970
3649533 Reijonen et al. Mar 1972
3653438 Wagner Apr 1972
3665716 Rogers et al. May 1972
3705851 Brauer Dec 1972
3727686 Prates et al. Apr 1973
3735815 Myers May 1973
3765483 Vencil Oct 1973
3796883 Smith et al. Mar 1974
3823777 Allen et al. Jul 1974
3828525 Copa et al. Aug 1974
3846290 Raymond Nov 1974
3980138 Knopik Sep 1976
3990513 Perch Nov 1976
4016930 Arnold Apr 1977
4026355 Johnson et al. May 1977
4126556 Swanson et al. Nov 1978
4167973 Forte et al. Sep 1979
4183407 Knopik Jan 1980
4241787 Price Dec 1980
4283212 Graham et al. Aug 1981
4296810 Price Oct 1981
4303127 Freel et al. Dec 1981
4306961 Taciuk Dec 1981
4323122 Knopik Apr 1982
4366846 Curati, Jr. Jan 1983
4369839 Freeman et al. Jan 1983
4401569 Jhaveri et al. Aug 1983
4435292 Kirk et al. Mar 1984
4442901 Zison Apr 1984
4469176 Zison et al. Sep 1984
4518399 Croskell et al. May 1985
4544381 Schmidt Oct 1985
4574062 Weitman Mar 1986
4576717 Collin et al. Mar 1986
4588506 Raymond et al. May 1986
4593760 Visser et al. Jun 1986
4625801 McLaughlin et al. Dec 1986
4660639 Visser et al. Apr 1987
4662900 Ottengraf May 1987
4664805 Focht May 1987
4683064 Hallberg et al. Jul 1987
4713343 Wilson, Jr. et al. Dec 1987
4715965 Sigerson et al. Dec 1987
4723968 Schippert et al. Feb 1988
4730672 Payne Mar 1988
4738206 Noland Apr 1988
4745850 Bastian et al. May 1988
4749491 Lawes et al. Jun 1988
4755304 Hallberg et al. Jul 1988
4765902 Ely et al. Aug 1988
4780215 Carlson Oct 1988
4782625 Gerken et al. Nov 1988
4799878 Schaeffer Jan 1989
4806148 Ottengraf Feb 1989
4832122 Corey et al. May 1989
4832711 Christel, Jr. et al. May 1989
4842448 Koerner et al. Jun 1989
4846134 Perry et al. Jul 1989
4846852 Schweitzer et al. Jul 1989
4848460 Johnson, Jr. et al. Jul 1989
4850745 Hater et al. Jul 1989
4864942 Fochtman et al. Sep 1989
4872994 Jakob Oct 1989
4886119 Bernhardt et al. Dec 1989
4890673 Payne Jan 1990
4892688 Bernhardt Jan 1990
4895085 Chips Jan 1990
4919570 Payne Apr 1990
4943305 Bernhardt Jul 1990
4945988 Payne et al. Aug 1990
4950394 Bernhardt et al. Aug 1990
4951417 Gerken et al. Aug 1990
4954258 Little Sep 1990
4966611 Schumacher et al. Oct 1990
4982788 Donnelly Jan 1991
5006250 Roberts et al. Apr 1991
5009266 Dieter Apr 1991
5015365 Vara et al. May 1991
5017289 Ely et al. May 1991
5050676 Hess et al. Sep 1991
5069286 Roensch et al. Dec 1991
5076360 Morrow Dec 1991
5076727 Johnson et al. Dec 1991
5080793 Urlings Jan 1992
5086717 McCrossan Feb 1992
5095975 Bernhardt Mar 1992
5111883 Savery May 1992
5116163 Bernhardt May 1992
5122165 Wang et al. Jun 1992
5122166 Hyrcyk et al. Jun 1992
5143606 Bernhardt Sep 1992
5143607 Bernhardt Sep 1992
5147535 Bernhardt Sep 1992
5161914 Rahn et al. Nov 1992
5171103 Bernhardt Dec 1992
5172764 Hajali et al. Dec 1992
5173092 Rudder Dec 1992
5180503 Gorelick et al. Jan 1993
5183563 Rodden Feb 1993
5185080 Boyle Feb 1993
5197541 Hess et al. Mar 1993
5220958 Bernhardt Jun 1993
5221159 Billings et al. Jun 1993
5263795 Corey et al. Nov 1993
5277815 Beeman Jan 1994
5279740 Basile et al. Jan 1994
5281333 Bernhardt Jan 1994
5302286 Semprini et al. Apr 1994
5318698 Bernhardt Jun 1994
5330651 Robertson et al. Jul 1994
5358357 Mancini et al. Oct 1994
5382267 Savage et al. Jan 1995
5384048 Hazen et al. Jan 1995
5389267 Gorelick et al. Feb 1995
5402848 Kelly Apr 1995
5425598 Pennington Jun 1995
5439594 Regan et al. Aug 1995
5441365 Duffney et al. Aug 1995
5441641 Vail et al. Aug 1995
5456550 Devlin Oct 1995
5480549 Looney et al. Jan 1996
5545801 Fulton Aug 1996
5545803 Heath et al. Aug 1996
5554290 Suthersan Sep 1996
5575589 Suthersan Nov 1996
5588490 Suthersan et al. Dec 1996
5698092 Chen Dec 1997
5713522 Lundberg Feb 1998
5753122 Taylor et al. May 1998
5833388 Edwards et al. Nov 1998
5833855 Saunders Nov 1998
5893975 Eifert Apr 1999
6007274 Suthersan Dec 1999
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
3427532 C1 Aug 1985 DEX
Non-Patent Literature Citations (16)
Entry
In Situ Reactive Walls, Remediation Engineering, Chapter 7, pp. 187-206.
In Situ Aeration of Groundwater: A Technology Overview--Oct. 16, & 17, 1990.
Proceedings of the NWWA/API Conference on Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water--Prevention, Detection and Restoration--Nov. 13-15, 1985.
Fifth National Outdoor Action Conference on Aquifer Restoration, Ground Water Monitoring, and Geophysical Methods--May 13-16, 1991 (Ground Water Mgmt., Book 5 of the Series).
The Fifth National Symposium and Exposition on Aquifer Restoration and Ground Water Monitoring--May 21-24, 1985.
Haztech International '88--Hazardous Water & Hazardous Materials Management--Sep. 20-22, 1988.
Volume II, Proceedings of Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water: Prevention, Detection and Restoration--Nov. 9-11, 1988.
Public Notice (3 pages).
Declaration Statement--Record of Decision; Rod Decision Summary (with attachments); and Responsive Summary, Upjohn Manufacturing Company, Superfund Site, Barceloneta, Puerto Rico.
Lexis Nexis--Environmental Protection Agency, Upjohn Manufacturing Company--Sep. 30, 1988.
Near Surface Geochemical Monitoring of Underground Gas Storage Facilities--Apr., 1986.
SPL External Vapor Vending (Elimination) Program--Nov. 2, 1983.
Water Well Technology--Field Principals of Exploration Drilling and Development of Ground Water and Other Selected Minerals (4 page cover and pp. 240-308) (Michael D. Campbell and Jay H. Lehr).
Ground Water and Wells--A Reference Book for the Water-Well Industry--4th Printing 1975, Chapter 10, pp. 185-208 and Chapter 20, pp. 375-394.
Hydrogeologic and Geochemical Investigation, Mt. Olive Greens, Mt. Olive Township, N.J.--Nov., 1982.
A Monitoring and Removal Program for Leaked Propane Gas in the Vadose (Unsaturated) Zone: A Case Study (Thomas Lobasso, Jr. and Andrew J. Barber).
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 420234 Apr 1995
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 661621 Jun 1996
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 951219 Sep 1997