This invention relates to the field of gemstones and jewelry, and in particular to enhancing the optical and light qualities of a gemstone.
Probably without realizing it, most people assume that there is a perfect, or best, or ideal way to cut a diamond. Most of this thinking is probably based on studies conducted by Marcel Tolkowsky in the early twentieth century. Further details of his work, and various standards and nomenclature of diamonds and diamond-cutting are well laid out in U.S. Pat. No. 8,069,688, all of the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Tolkowsky posited that there is a single, most favorable, way to cut a diamond, so as to maximize both the brilliance and the fire in a diamond. The specification Tolkowsky developed requires that the total depth of the diamond be 59.3% of the girdle diameter, and that the table diameter is 53% of the girdle diameter. The Tolkowsky specification further requires a 34.5 degree crown angle, and a 40.75 degree pavilion angle. This cut does result in a diamond with excellent brilliance and fire. A side view of such a diamond is shown in
This invention relates to improvements to the gemstones described above and to solutions to some of the issues raised or not solved thereby.
The invention provides a method for creating an inexpensive diamond with good optical and light qualities. The method includes cutting the diamond with a girdle diameter and a plurality of pavilion main facets, and a total height that is about 25% to 40% of the girdle diameter, and forming a polygon shape into at least some of the pavilion main facets, or forming a series of substantially parallel lines into at least one of the pavilion main facets. The invention further provides a gemstone having a girdle of a predetermined diameter, a plurality of pavilion main facets, the gemstone having a total height that is about 25% to 40% of the girdle diameter, and a polygon shape formed into at least some of the pavilion main facets. Another aspect of the invention provides a gemstone having a girdle having a diameter, a plurality of pavilion main facets and a plurality of girdle lower facets, the gemstone having a total height that is about 25% to 40% of the girdle diameter, and a geometric pattern etched into at least some of the pavilion main facets and at least some of the girdle lower facets. Yet another aspect of the invention provides a gemstone having a girdle having a width, a pavilion portion with a plurality of pavilion main facets and a plurality of girdle lower facets, and a polygon shape etched into at least some of the pavilion main facets and girdle lower facets.
The invention further provides a cut diamond including a girdle portion having a girdle plane, the girdle portion having a substantially round shape. On one side of the girdle portion is a crown portion, the crown portion including a table facet having eight sides and thus an octagonal shape. Eight crown facets are arranged around the table facet and have three sides. Each of the eight crown facets has one side arranged adjacent to one of the eight sides of the table facet and arranged at an angle between 16-30 degrees with respect to the girdle plane. Eight upper girdle facets are arranged around the table facet and have three sides. Each of the upper girdle facets has one side arranged adjacent to the girdle, and the other two sides adjacent to adjacent crown facets. A pavilion portion is arranged on another side of the girdle portion diametrically opposite the crown portion. The pavilion portion tapers inward towards a culet at the bottom, as the pavilion portion extends away from the girdle plane. The pavilion portion includes sixteen girdle lower facets, each having a triangular shape with three sides and extending part way toward the culet, and each terminating in a point, short of the culet. One side of each of the sixteen girdle lower facets is arranged adjacent the girdle portion. The pavilion portion also includes eight pavilion main facets, each having four sides. Each one of the eight pavilion main facets is arranged between two pairs of the sixteen girdle lower facets, and each one of the eight pavilion main facets arranged at an angle between 28-30 degrees with respect to the girdle plane.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent hereainfter.
There are disadvantages to the ideal cut or the round brilliant cut for diamonds. Chief among those is that, although the table and girdle are well-perceived at any time, once the stone is set in a setting, the pavilion is generally not very visible, being covered by or receding into the setting. Accordingly, a buyer of a round brilliant cut gem is paying for relatively a lot of diamond weight that cannot be seen from the side. Generally this issue has not been perceived as major, as it was considered that the depth of pavilion was required, unavoidable in effect, in order to achieve enough brilliance to make the diamond look the way it is expected to look, sparkly, brilliant, fiery. Historically a diamond that did not have the necessary depth, in proportion to the diameter of the girdle, simply would not, it was believed, have that high level of light reflecting or refracting qualities returned to the observer, as later quantified and standardized by GemEx Systems, Inc., by means of its Light Performance® certification and nomenclature. So it was thought that the price simply had to be paid for the extra carat weight, so that the diamond looked as good as expected, once mounted.
As shown in
One aspect of the present invention provides a gemstone with much less height than a conventional brilliant cut gem, therefore having the advantage of being much less expensive, based on its lesser carat weight. As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In describing proportions of gemstones, it is common to use the diameter of the girdle portion 12 as the basis for reference. As shown best in
The present invention provides a way to achieve a high measurement of light return on the Light Performance® scale, without requiring that the gem have the ideal proportions, in particular the conventional percentage of depth-to-diameter proportions. That way, a buyer can more affordably buy a diamond that has a larger overall diameter, that is, that looks face-up as big as a diamond of significantly greater carat weight. For example, a diamond of 0.2 carat manufactured with the method of the present invention will appear comparable to a 0.4 carat diamond. To use another example, a buyer could choose to buy a diamond manufactured using the present invention that is by its face-up diameter as big as a 2 carat diamond, though the carat weight would likely be closer to 1.25 carat weight. The commercial value of such diamonds is thus significantly increased when the present invention is applied.
According to the present invention, as shown best in
The present invention is a novel method of manufacturing a diamond in which the commercial value of the product of the invention is equal to, or competitive with, the commercial value of a traditionally cut jewelry grade diamond where no such close comparison of commercial value was ever possible before the present invention. The beneficial effect of this invention can be seen in
Although the invention has been herein described in what is perceived to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the invention is not intended to be limited to the specific embodiments set forth above. Rather, it is recognized that modifications may be made by one of skill in the art of the invention without departing from the spirit or intent of the invention and, therefore, the invention is to be taken as including all reasonable equivalents to the subject matter of the appended claims and the description of the invention herein.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/276,428, filed Jan. 8, 2016, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62276428 | Jan 2016 | US |