Enhanced cage insertion assembly

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10327911
  • Patent Number
    10,327,911
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, July 19, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 25, 2019
    5 years ago
Abstract
An inserter instrument for inserting an intervertebral fusion cage having curved sidewalls, comprising: a) a threaded securement rod that mates with the cage via screw threads;b) a cannulated cage holder to receive the rod and hold the cage in position as the sheath is retracted; andc) a bulleted cannulated sheath, wherein the sheath is curved and comprises a superelastic shape memory material having a curved configuration and a straight configuration.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The natural intervertebral disc contains a jelly-like nucleus pulposus surrounded by a fibrous annulus fibrosus. Under an axial load, the nucleus pulposus compresses and radially transfers that load to the annulus fibrosus. The laminated nature of the annulus fibrosus provides it with a high tensile strength and so allows it to expand radially in response to this transferred load.


In a healthy intervertebral disc, cells within the nucleus pulposus produce an extracellular matrix (ECM) containing a high percentage of proteoglycans. These proteoglycans contain sulfated functional groups that retain water, thereby providing the nucleus pulposus with its cushioning qualities. These nucleus pulposus cells may also secrete small amounts of cytokines as well as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). These cytokines and MMPs help regulate the metabolism of the nucleus pulposus cells.


In some instances of degenerative disc disease (DDD), gradual degeneration of the intervertebral disc is caused by mechanical instabilities in other portions of the spine. In these instances, increased loads and pressures on the nucleus pulposus cause the cells within the disc (or invading macrophages) to emit larger than normal amounts of the above-mentioned cytokines. In other instances of DDD, genetic factors or apoptosis can also cause the cells within the nucleus pulposus to emit toxic amounts of these cytokines and MMPs. In some instances, the pumping action of the disc may malfunction (due to, for example, a decrease in the proteoglycan concentration within the nucleus pulposus), thereby retarding the flow of nutrients into the disc as well as the flow of waste products out of the disc. This reduced capacity to eliminate waste may result in the accumulation of high levels of proinflammatory cytokines and/or MMPs that may cause nerve irritation and pain.


As DDD progresses, toxic levels of the cytokines and MMPs present in the nucleus pulposus begin to degrade the extracellular matrix. In particular, the MMPs (as mediated by the cytokines) begin cleaving the water-retaining portions of the proteoglycans, thereby reducing their water-retaining capabilities. This degradation leads to a less flexible nucleus pulposus, and so changes the loading pattern within the disc, thereby possibly causing delamination of the annulus fibrosus. These changes cause more mechanical instability, thereby causing the cells to emit even more cytokines, typically thereby upregulating MMPs. As this destructive cascade continues and DDD further progresses, the disc begins to bulge (“a herniated disc”), and then ultimately ruptures, causing the nucleus pulposus to contact the spinal cord and produce pain.


One proposed method of managing these problems is to remove the problematic disc and replace it with a porous device that restores disc height and allows for bone growth therethrough for the fusion of the adjacent vertebrae. These devices are commonly called “fusion devices”.


Designs of intervertebral fusion devices are generally either box-like (i.e., Smith-Robinson style) or threaded cylinders (i.e., Cloward style). Smith-Robinson style implants have the advantage of possessing better contact area to the vertebral endplates, but rely on a coarse surface texture (such as teeth) to prevent their migration once implanted. Insertion then requires over distraction of the disc space to slide the implant in or to provide a smoother implant, which can migrate post-op.


One such box-like design is the Brantigan cage, which is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,743,256 (“Brantigan”). Brantigan discloses an improved surgical method for eliminating spinal back pain caused by ruptured or degenerated vertebral discs by spanning the disc space between adjacent vertebrae with rigid fusion devices, or “cages”, having surfaces facilitating bone ingrowth and bottomed on prepared sites of the vertebrae to integrate the implant with the vertebrae and to provide a permanent weight supporting strut maintaining the disc space.


One commercial box-like design is the injection-molded carbon fiber reinforced PEEK (CFRP) cage made by DePuy Spine. However, these cages are difficult to insert because of the interference fit that is required for intervertebral space distraction. In addition, the reinforced PEEK material that makes up the teeth is brittle and so is susceptible to breakage when applying impact or torque loads to the implant.


Current interbody devices are made from single materials (e.g., machined titanium, or molded and/or machined PEEK). Titanium has the disadvantage of being radiopaque (which can interfere with fusion assessment on x-ray) while also having a high modulus of elasticity (which can stress shield the bone graft). Injection molded CFRP is very brittle and susceptible to fracture during insertion. Unreinforced PEEK is much less brittle but also weaker than carbon-filled PEEK, requiring thicker-walled designs (diminishing space for bone graft). In addition, the teeth of an unreinforced PEEK cage are softer and so may allow more migration. Both PEEK and carbon-filled PEEK are radiolucent.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,824,565 (“Muhana”) discloses implant and instrument designs wherein some of the implant embodiments have planked designs and a mating inserter instrument. However, the disclosed inserter wraps around the exterior of the implant and partially into grooves on the implant. Moreover, the disclosed implant is derived from bone and is not hollow. The insertion technique disclosed by Muhana requires a cutting tool to prepare a channel for the implant.


US Patent Publication 2008-0154377 (Voellmicke) discloses a cage adapted to contain an inserter within its inner volume during insertion.


US Patent Publication 2009-0198339 (Kleiner) discloses an implantable intervertebral fusion cage including a removable means for retaining material inside of the cage during implantation. Embodiments are directed toward an implantable intervertebral fusion cage that includes at least one removable shield or veneer that is capable of retaining a surgically useful material, such as a spinal fusion-inducing material, inside of the fusion cage during implantation and/or until the shield or veneer is removed. None of the Kleiner shields cover the teeth of the cages.


U.S. Pat. No. 7,569,054 (Michelson) discloses disc space docking and distraction means. In particular, Michelson discloses an apparatus for use in human surgery has a tubular member with a passage for providing protected access to a surgical site. The passage has a minimum width transverse to the mid-longitudinal axis of the tubular member. Two opposed extensions extend from the distal end of the tubular member. The extensions each have a length and a maximum height perpendicular to the length. The maximum height of the extensions are less than the length of each extension and greater than one-half the minimum width of the passage. Each extension has an interior surface at least in part facing the mid-longitudinal axis of the tubular member. The interior surfaces of the extensions are spaced apart from one another along the length of each extension a distance no less than the minimum width of the passage. Each extension has opposed bone contacting surfaces configured to contact portions of bone.


Other relevant instruments include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,008,431 (“Simonson”); U.S. Pat. No. 5,797,909 (“Michelson II”); U.S. Pat. No. 6,080,155 (“Michelson III”); U.S. Pat. No. 6,096,038 (“Michelson IV”); U.S. Pat. No. 7,300,440 (“Zdeblick”); and US Patent Publication 2009-0198339 (“Kleiner”).


In summary, the insertion of both smooth and toothed intervertebral cages has proven to be problematic due to high resistance forces (friction) and interference fit of the cage and intervertebral space. Whereas toothed cages are difficult to insert, cages with smooth upper and lower surfaces have demonstrated undesirable migration.


Current injection-molded PEEK or carbon fiber reinforced PEEK (CFRP) cages are difficult to insert because of the interference fit between the textured/spiked surfaces of the implant and the bony endplates.


The difficulty of direct, unshielded cage insertion and final positioning in the disc space also increases the likelihood of bony endplate damage, as the disc space preparation, FSU distraction forces and insertion trajectory are variable.


Consistent and accurate placement of the posteriorly inserted spinal fusion cages is difficult because light tamping and impaction are employed for final positioning. Cages have been over inserted via pushing or impaction through the annulus and into the adjacent body cavities and/or structures.


Most cages are filled with graft and/or bone inducing substances including BMP and collagen sponge. It has been found that the graft and/or BMP frequently drips or falls out of the graft retaining pockets. The uncontrolled delivery of the BMP/graft can irritate adjacent tissues and prompt bone formation in undesired locations including heterotopic bone.


Many spinal fusion procedures require either pre and or post packing of the disc space, thereby increasing patient risk and operative time.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a cage insertion instrument adapted to insert an intervertebral interbody cage through a conventional spinal surgery approach (such as ALIF, TLIF, PLIF, or LLIF). In preferred embodiments, this instrument includes a cannulated sheath comprising a) a proximal cannulated portion, and b) a distal cannulated sheath that surrounds the cage during insertion into the disc space. The sheath shields the textured surface of the cage from the vertebral body endplates, thereby preventing their stress-inducing engagement therewith. The sheath has an expandable tapered or bulleted distal tip to ease insertion and placement of the instrument (and cage) within the disc space. Once the cage is inserted to its proper depth in the disc space, the sheath can be retracted while the cage is held stationary by a threaded rod disposed within the sheath. This retraction exposes the sharp, textured surface of the cage for engagement with the vertebral endplates.


Therefore, the inserter of the present invention provides a number of benefits to the spinal surgeon. In particular, it provides initial distraction of the disc space, improves the ease of insertion and placement of an intervertebral spacer, minimizes damage to the spacer and/or endplate during spacer insertion and placement, provides a means to deliver and contain graft within the spacer and surrounding disc space, and reduces the secondary positioning and time required to implant a spacer.


The sheath also provides a delivery and containment means for bone graft and/or BMP's, bone graft can be placed either within the cage, or distal or proximal to the cage for simultaneous delivery therewith. This containment means prevents leakage during insertion into the body, during placement into the disc space, and during final deployment into the disc space.


Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided an assembly comprising:

    • a) an intervertebral fusion cage having a leading end, a trailing end, an upper face and a lower face, and
    • b) an inserter comprising:
      • i) a cannulated rod holder having a bore therethrough,
      • ii) a rod received within the bore of the cannulated rod holder, the rod adapted to mate with the cage,
      • iii) a cannulated sheath receiving the cannulated rod holder, the sheath having a plurality of sheath portions extending distally therefrom, and


        wherein a first sheath portion has an inner portion bearing against the lower face of the cage, and


        wherein a second sheath portion has an inner portion bearing against the upper face of the cage.


The present invention includes a retractable sheath that holds a cage as it is inserted into the disc space, thereby shielding the sharp teeth of the cage from boney endplates and delivering graft to the disc space. Whereas conventional instrument systems that use delivery tubes for the cage do not place the tube into the disc space (but rather between the skin and the entrance to the disc space), the tubular sheath of the present invention enters the disc space.


The present invention also includes tubular, expandable spinal disc graft containment means.


Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of delivering a fusion cage to an intervertebral disc space bounded by adjacent vertebral endplates, comprising the step of:

    • a) delivering the fusion cage into the disc space without contacting its surfaces to the vertebral endplates during delivery.


In preferred embodiments thereof, a sheath is interposed between the cage surfaces and the endplates to prevent contact therebetween during delivery.


Also in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a method of delivering a fusion cage into the disc space, comprising the steps of:

    • a) inserting a distal end of a cannula into an intervertebral disc space,
    • b) delivering the fusion cage through the cannula into the disc space.





DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIGS. 1A-1D disclose various views of an inserter of the present invention having four main components.



FIG. 2 discloses a fusion cage being held by an inserter of the present invention, along with the space available therein for graft placement.



FIGS. 3A-3D disclose various views of an inserter of the present invention, wherein the sheath has a rectangular cross-section that tracks the cross-section of the fusion cage.



FIGS. 4A-4D disclose various steps by which the inserter of FIGS. 3A-3D inserts a cage into a disc space.



FIG. 5 discloses an inserter of the present invention having three main components.



FIGS. 6A-6B discloses an inserter of the present invention having two main components.



FIGS. 7A-7B discloses an inserter of the present invention having a curved distal sheath.



FIGS. 7C-7D discloses the distal and proximal loading of the inserter of FIGS. 7A-7B.



FIGS. 8A-8D disclose the sequential advance of the curved distal sheath of an inserter of the present invention.



FIG. 9 discloses a distal portion of an inserter of the present invention having a modular expanding sheath tip.



FIGS. 10A-10B disclose the insertion of multi-component cages with the inserter of the present invention.



FIGS. 11A-11C disclose a distal portion of an inserter of the present invention fitted with various slit sheaths.



FIG. 12A discloses a docking port component of the present invention having distally extending securement teeth.



FIG. 12B discloses a docking port component of the present invention having a distally located adjustable collar.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In some embodiments, the instrument comprises two, three, four or more components.


Now referring to FIGS. 1A-1D, there is provided an assembly of the present invention in which the inserter has four components: a sheath, a cannulated rod holder, a rod and a docking port. In particular, the assembly comprises:

    • a) an intervertebral fusion cage 1 having a leading end 3, a trailing end 5 having a threaded hole 6, an upper face 7 and a lower face 9, and
    • b) an inserter 11 comprising:
      • i) a cannulated rod holder 13 having a bore therethrough and a distal end portion 17 having a distal end 18 bearing against the trailing end of the cage,
      • ii) a rod 22 received within the bore of the cannulated rod holder, the rod having a threaded distal end 20 mating with the threaded hole of the cage,
      • iii) a cannulated sheath 19 adapted to receive the cannulated rod holder, the sheath having a plurality of sheath portions 23,25 extending distally therefrom,
      • iv) a docking port 33 having a bore therethrough and a substantially frustoconical distal end 35, wherein the cannulated sheath is slidingly received in the docking port and


        wherein a first sheath portion 23 has an inner portion 24 bearing against the lower face of the cage, and


        wherein a second sheath portion 25 has an inner portion 26 bearing against the upper face of the cage.


In general, the rod is a proximally-handled instrument that mates with the cage and typically has a distally extending screw thread similar to conventional posterior cage inserters. It is typically called a threaded securement rod. Typically, the rod has a threaded distal end, the trailing end of the cage has a mating threaded hole, and the threaded distal end of the rod is received in the mating threaded hole of the cage to secure the cage. The threaded connection allows the surgeon to keep the cage in its inserted position while the sheath is removed therefrom.


The function of the cannulated rod holder is to hold cage in position as sheath is retracted. As shown in FIG. 2, it typically has distally extending feet 24 for bearing against the trailing end of the cage. Thus, in some embodiments, the cannulated rod holder may be considered a cannulated cage holder as well. In some embodiments, the cannulated rod holder can further include a cylindrical flange or “piston” 99 that extends radially about the distal portion of the rod. This piston allows for sealed graft or BMP delivery distally thereof. As shown in FIG. 2, graft materials 31 can be placed within the cage, or placed distal and/or proximal to the cage within the cage holder, thereby eliminating the need to pre-pack or post-pack the disc space with graft materials. The piston feature provides a proximal stop for such graft placement proximal of the cage.


Referring back to FIGS. 1A-1D, the bulleted sheath 19 is a retractable cannulated sheath that slides over the rod/rod holder assembly. The sheath preferably has a very smooth (i.e., low coefficient of friction), semi-rigid inner wall 24,26 with a wall thickness of approximately 0.5 mm or less. Preferred materials of construction for the sheath include: polymerics (such as polyethylene, polypropylene, PEEK, polyurethane, and PTFE) or metallics (such as stainless steel, titanium alloy, and nitinol). One preferred sheath is constructed of a radiolucent material that allows for fluoroscopic imaging of the cage. In some embodiments, the sheath has a bulleted distal tip that optionally possesses at least one expansion slot (with four such slots shown in FIGS. 1A-1D, 2 and 4A-4D). Now referring to FIGS. 3A-3D, in some embodiments, the sheath can be produced in varying shapes, including those having a rectangular transverse cross-section 50.


In use, and now referring to FIG. 2, the sheath typically contains bone graft 31. In some cases, at least a portion of the bone graft is located within the cage. In others, at least a portion of the bone graft is located outside of the cage.


In some embodiments, the sheath comprises a distal pair of cup-like, opposed sheath half leafs, while in others the sheath comprises four sheath quarter leafs. Now referring to FIGS. 6A-6B, the proximal portion 98 of each distal sheath leaf 23, 25 is adapted to flex, thereby allowing the distal tip of the distal sheath leaf to open and close. In preferred embodiments, in their collapsed arrangement, the distal sheath leaves form a substantially conical shape distally, thereby forming a distal bullet tip. In other cases, the distal sheath leaves form a substantially tubular sheath shape proximally. In this way, the collective shape of the distal sheath leaves is much like that of a bulleted cage—i.e., it has a tubular body and a bulleted distal tip.


The distal sheath portions can also possess smooth outer surfaces to reduce friction and thereby increase the ease of insertion.


Typically, and now referring to FIG. 3A-3D, the inserter further comprises: iv) a docking port 33 having a bore therethrough and a substantially frustoconical distal end 35, wherein the cannulated sheath is slidingly received in the docking port. The docking port acts as a retractor for soft tissue and helps to place the cannulated sheath upon the vertebral body or within the disc. The docking port can also control insertion angle and depth of the bulleted sheath with enclosed cage. In some embodiments, the port is a cannulated body having a throughbore and a distal end portion having a tapered, cannulated, pyramidal or frustoconical shape.


The present invention is believed to be compatible with any conventional fusion cage. Typically, the upper and lower faces of the cage comprise a plurality of teeth. In some embodiments, the cage has a substantially rectangular transverse cross-section and the sheath has a corresponding substantially rectangular transverse cross-section. In some embodiments, the cage has a substantially circular transverse cross-section and the sheath has a corresponding substantially circular transverse cross-section. In some embodiments, the cage has a substantially elliptical transverse cross-section and the sheath has a corresponding substantially elliptical transverse cross-section.


Typically, the cage distracts the disc space during insertion. It is easy to insert and optimizes clinical performance once in place because it resists migration and subsidence, has an appropriate stiffness for load sharing, is preferably radiolucent, and has a shape that is able to contain injected graft material such as growth factors. In addition, the cage is robust over a wide variation of surgical technique because it will not break even when large forces are applied thereto.


The cage of the present invention is preferably compatible with the broad use of injectable paste-like bone grafting materials, such as BMP-containing pastes. It may be inserted empty and then filled with graft in-situ. With the availability of injectable pastes, cages will no longer require large, contiguous internal volumes to accept morselized/granular bone graft. Spaces can be smaller and more numerous. The cage of the present invention will be contained and shielded by the bulleted sheath and will therefore not experience as large impact loads during insertion.


Now referring to FIGS. 3A-3D, in some embodiments, the cage has a transverse cross-section 50 that is rectangular, and the transverse cross sections of the port, the bulleted sheath and the cannulated cage holder can substantially match that of the cage itself. This is a preferred embodiment, as it minimizes the over-distraction required in other embodiments for cage insertion.


Now referring to FIGS. 4A-4D, in one method of using the four-component inserter with the present invention, the sequence of implantation steps are as follows:

    • (1) fill the cage and sheath with bone graft.
    • (2) dock the docking port 33 onto the disc space. The port can be used to direct the angle and location of any desired disc clearing effort as well as cage implantation.
    • (3) advance of the bulleted sheath. The bulleted sheath 19 containing the graft and cage are advanced to the desired depth and location. The bulleted sheath reduces insertion forces due to its shape and its lubricious material of construction, while encasing the cage and its associated securement features (teeth).
    • (4) imaging. Imaging is performed to confirm cage positioning.
    • (5) sheath retraction: The sheath is retracted from the cage 1, thereby exposing the cage and its contents to the vertebral endplates.
    • (6) Cage Disconnection/Release: Following retraction of the sheath, the threaded rod is disengaged from the cage, thereby leaving the cage in the disc space at the desired location.
    • (7) Added Graft Injection (optional): As a last step, additional graft can be deployed via packing or injecting through the cannulated cage holder.


Now referring to FIG. 5, in some embodiments, the inserter instrument of the present invention is a three-component design that does not have a docking port. This design includes:

    • a) a threaded securement rod 22 that mates with the cage via screw threads in a manner similar to conventional posterior cage inserters;
    • b) a cannulated cage holder 13 to receive the rod and hold the cage in position as the sheath is retracted; and
    • c) a bulleted cannulated sheath 19.


In using the inserter of FIG. 5, the bulleted sheath (containing the graft and the cage 1) is advanced to the desired location. Due to the shape and lubricious material which encases the cage and associated securement features (such as teeth), the bulleted sheath reduces insertion forces. Imaging is then performed to confirm positioning.


Now referring to FIGS. 6A-6B, there is provided a simple two-component embodiment of the present invention employing a cage pusher/holder 61 and an insertion sheath 19. The cage pusher/holder features the threaded feature of the rod and the shoulder 63 of the cannulated rod holder of FIGS. 1A-1D. The cage pusher/holder holds the cage 1 in position as sheath is retracted, and the feet can act as a piston for sealed graft delivery. The bulleted sheath 19 (containing the graft and cage) is advanced to the desired location. The bulleted sheath reduces insertion forces due to the shape and lubricious material which encases the cage and associated securement features (such as teeth). Imaging is performed to confirm positioning.


In some embodiments, and now referring to FIGS. 7A and 7B, the cages of the assembly of the present invention have curved sidewalls. Typically, these curved cages are placed in an anterior portion of the disc space. The curved sheath reduced the need for post-insertion manipulation of theses cages with conventional insertion methods which is more challenging due to the final position of the cage and the increased manipulation and forces that are required to psuh it in.


In preferred cases, the sheath is curved to help deliver these curved implants. In cases in which the sheath is curved, the sheath preferably comprises a superelastic shape memory material and has a curved configuration and a straight configuration. The sheath of the insertion device of the present invention also possesses curved sidewalls 71,72, thereby providing for shielded placement of the curved cage in the desired final location prior to sheath retraction. In one type of preferred curved inserter device (FIG. 7C), there is distal loading of the cage, allowing for minimal diameter of the bulleted sheath and cannulated cage holder. The second type of curved inserter device (FIG. 7D) allows for proximal cage loading, but requires an increased diameter of the bulleted sheath and cannulated cage holder. Such a curved inserter can be made to be self-steerable by using a memory metal or memory polymer sheath, or by using a threaded inserter that recovers its unloaded position upon deployment from the docking port.


In some embodiments, and now referring to FIGS. 8A-8D, the cage inserter can be steered into its desired location via cables or other means, wherein the sheath 19 has a tensioning cable 75 attached thereto.


In some embodiments, and now referring to FIG. 9, the cage inserter can have a modular expanding tip 77. The distal tip of the bulleted sheath can be modular and be attached to the proximal portion of the sheath. The modular component can be prepackaged sterile and marketed with the matching cage size contained within to minimize over-distraction. The entire inserter can also be polymeric and/or disposable.


In some embodiments, and now referring to FIGS. 10A and B, multiple cages 81 may be deployed. A plurality of curved or straight cages (or a combination of curved and straight cages) of a size smaller than a standard cage can be inserted either in succession or simultaneously. In some embodiments thereof, multiple cages can be connected to each other by a cable 83 to provide a more stable construct.


In some embodiments, and now referring to FIGS. 11A-C, the split sheath comprises a longitudinal gap 91 between sheath portions (i.e., the sheath portions do not contact each other). This gap allows for different cage heights to be handled by the same sheath component, thereby reducing the number of potential instruments in the set.


In some embodiments, and now referring to FIGS. 12A-B, the docking port could have multiple means for attachment, such as teeth, to provide security in between or onto the vertebral bodies. In some embodiments, and now referring to FIG. 12A the docking port can have one or more tongs or spikes 51 extending distally from its distal end portion to assist in holding position upon the vertebral bodies or within the disc. Typically, the docking port also has a proximal handle 53


Now referring to FIG. 12B, the docking port could also include an adjustable collar 93 and incremental adjustment grooves 95. These components could be used to both dock onto the vertebral bodies and control the depth to which the instrument is introduced into the disc space.


Typically, the inserter of the present invention can be made out of any material commonly used in medical instruments. The cage insertion instrument can be made available in a sterile version with preassembled cage and graft, or in a reusable version. If the inserter is designed to be reusable, then it is preferred that all of its components be made of stainless steel. If the inserter is designed to be disposable, then it is preferred that at least some of the components be made of plastic. Preferably, at least one component of the inserter is sterilized. More preferably, each component is sterilized.


The intervertebral fusion cage of the present invention may be manufactured from any biocompatible material commonly used in interbody fusion procedures. In some embodiments, the cage is made from a composite comprising 40-99% polyarylethyl ketone PAEK, and 1-60% carbon fiber. Such a cage is radiolucent. Preferably, the polyarylethyl ketone PAEK is selected from the group consisting of polyetherether ketone PEEK, polyether ketone ketone PEKK, polyether ketone ether ketone ketone PEKEKK, and polyether ketone PEK. Preferably, cage is made from woven, long carbon fiber laminates. Preferably, the PAEK and carbon fiber are homogeneously mixed. Preferably, the composite consists essentially of PAEK and carbon fiber. Preferably, the composite comprises 60-80 wt % PAEK and 20-40 wt % carbon fiber, more preferably 65-75 wt % PAEK and 25-35 wt % carbon fiber. In some embodiments, the cage is made from materials used in carbon fibers cages marketed by DePuy Spine, Raynham, Mass., USA. In some embodiments, the composite is PEEK-OPTIMA™, available from Invibio of Greenville, N.C.


In other embodiments, the cage is made from a metal such as titanium alloy, such as Ti-6A1-4V. In other embodiments, the cage is made from an allograft material. In some embodiments, the cage is made from ceramic, preferably a ceramic that can be at least partially resorbed, such as HA or TCP. In other embodiments, the ceramic comprises an oxide such as either alumina or zirconia. In some embodiments, the cage is made from a polymer, preferably a polymer that can be at least partially resorbed, such as PLA or PLG.


In preferred embodiments, the cage is provided in a sterile form.

Claims
  • 1. An assembly comprising: i) an intervertebral fusion cage having curved, substantially parallel sidewalls, andii) an inserter instrument for inserting the intervertebral fusion cage, comprising: a) a threaded securement rod that mates with the cage via screw threads;b) a cannulated cage holder to receive the rod and hold the cage in position; andc) a bulleted cannulated, extensible and retractable sheath extending from the cage holder,
  • 2. An assembly comprising: i) an intervertebral fusion cage having curved, substantially parallel sidewalls, andii) an inserter instrument for inserting the intervertebral fusion cage, comprising:a) a threaded securement rod that mates with the cage via screw threads;b) a cannulated cage holder to receive the rod and hold the cage in position; andc) a bulleted cannulated, extensible and retractable sheath extending from the cage holder,
  • 3. An assembly comprising: i) an intervertebral fusion cage having curved, substantially parallel sidewalls, andii) an inserter instrument for inserting the intervertebral fusion cage, comprising:a) a threaded securement rod that mates with the cage via screw threads;b) a cannulated cage holder to receive the rod and hold the cage in position; andc) a bulleted cannulated, extensible and retractable sheath extending from the cage holder
  • 4. The assembly of claim 3 wherein the curved inserter is self-steerable by using a memory metal or memory polymer sheath.
CONTINUING DATA

This application is a continuation of and claims priority from U.S. Ser. No. 14/623,982, filed Feb. 17, 2015, entitled “Enhanced Cage Insertion Device” (Voellmicke) (DEP6325USCNT1), and from U.S. Ser. No. 12/822,739, filed Jun. 24, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,979,860, entitled “Enhanced Cage Insertion Device” (Voellmicke) (DEP6325USNP), the specifications of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (434)
Number Name Date Kind
3867728 Stubstad et al. Feb 1975 A
4349921 Kuntz Sep 1982 A
4743256 Brantigan May 1988 A
4759766 Buettner-Janz et al. Jul 1988 A
4863476 Shepperd Sep 1989 A
4871366 von Recum et al. Oct 1989 A
4878915 Brantigan Nov 1989 A
5059193 Kuslich Oct 1991 A
5071437 Steffee Dec 1991 A
5123926 Pisharodi Jun 1992 A
5290312 Kojimoto et al. Mar 1994 A
5314477 Marnay May 1994 A
5344252 Kakimoto Sep 1994 A
5370697 Baumgartner Dec 1994 A
5390683 Pisharodi Feb 1995 A
5401269 Buttner-Janz et al. Mar 1995 A
5425773 Boyd et al. Jun 1995 A
5443514 Steffee Aug 1995 A
5507816 Bullivant Apr 1996 A
5522899 Michelson Jun 1996 A
5534029 Shima Jul 1996 A
5554191 Lahille et al. Sep 1996 A
5556431 Buttner-Janz Sep 1996 A
5562738 Boyd et al. Oct 1996 A
5609635 Michelson Mar 1997 A
5653763 Errico Aug 1997 A
5658335 Allen Aug 1997 A
5665122 Kambin Sep 1997 A
5676701 Yuan et al. Oct 1997 A
5683465 Shinn et al. Nov 1997 A
5697977 Pisharodi Dec 1997 A
5716415 Steffee Feb 1998 A
5772661 Michelson Jun 1998 A
5782832 Larsen et al. Jul 1998 A
5797909 Michelson Aug 1998 A
5860973 Michelson Jan 1999 A
5865848 Baker Feb 1999 A
5888224 Beckers et al. Mar 1999 A
5888226 Rogozinski Mar 1999 A
5888227 Cottle Mar 1999 A
5893889 Harrington Apr 1999 A
5893890 Pisharodi Apr 1999 A
5980522 Koros et al. Nov 1999 A
5989291 Ralph et al. Nov 1999 A
6039761 Li Mar 2000 A
6039763 Shelokov Mar 2000 A
6045579 Hochshuler Apr 2000 A
6080155 Michelson Jun 2000 A
6083225 Winslow Jul 2000 A
6096038 Micheson Aug 2000 A
6099531 Bonutti Aug 2000 A
6102950 Vaccaro Aug 2000 A
6106557 Robioneck et al. Aug 2000 A
6113637 Gill et al. Sep 2000 A
6113638 Williams et al. Sep 2000 A
6117174 Nolan Sep 2000 A
6127597 Beyar et al. Oct 2000 A
6129763 Chauvin et al. Oct 2000 A
6146387 Trott et al. Nov 2000 A
6176882 Biedermann et al. Jan 2001 B1
6179794 Burras Jan 2001 B1
6179873 Zientek Jan 2001 B1
6183517 Suddaby Feb 2001 B1
6193757 Foley et al. Feb 2001 B1
6296647 Robioneck et al. Oct 2001 B1
6302914 Michelson Oct 2001 B1
6332895 Suddaby Dec 2001 B1
6368350 Erickson et al. Apr 2002 B1
6368351 Glenn Apr 2002 B1
6375682 Fleischmann et al. Apr 2002 B1
6387130 Stone May 2002 B1
6409766 Brett Jun 2002 B1
6419705 Erickson Jul 2002 B1
6419706 Graf Jul 2002 B1
6436140 Liu et al. Aug 2002 B1
6454806 Cohen et al. Sep 2002 B1
6454807 Jackson Sep 2002 B1
6468310 Ralph et al. Oct 2002 B1
6488710 Besselink Dec 2002 B2
6517580 Ramadan et al. Feb 2003 B1
6527804 Gauchet et al. Mar 2003 B1
6533818 Weber et al. Mar 2003 B1
6558424 Thalgott May 2003 B2
6562074 Gerbec et al. May 2003 B2
6582468 Gauchet Jun 2003 B1
6610094 Husson Aug 2003 B2
6641614 Wagner et al. Nov 2003 B1
6648917 Gerbec et al. Nov 2003 B2
6669732 Serhan et al. Dec 2003 B2
6676665 Foley et al. Jan 2004 B2
6706070 Wagner et al. Mar 2004 B1
6719796 Cohen et al. Apr 2004 B2
6723126 Berry Apr 2004 B1
6733532 Gauchet et al. May 2004 B1
6740117 Ralph et al. May 2004 B2
6743255 Ferree Jun 2004 B2
6773460 Jackson Aug 2004 B2
6793678 Hawkins Sep 2004 B2
6805714 Sutcliffe Oct 2004 B2
6824565 Muhanna Nov 2004 B2
6855167 Shimp Feb 2005 B2
6863673 Gerbec et al. Mar 2005 B2
6881229 Khandkar et al. Apr 2005 B2
6893464 Kiester May 2005 B2
6936071 Marnay et al. Aug 2005 B1
6953477 Berry Oct 2005 B2
6955691 Chae et al. Oct 2005 B2
6969404 Ferree Nov 2005 B2
6969405 Suddaby Nov 2005 B2
7008431 Simonson Mar 2006 B2
7018412 Ferreira et al. Mar 2006 B2
7018416 Hanson et al. Mar 2006 B2
7037339 Houfburg et al. May 2006 B2
7083650 Moskowitz et al. Aug 2006 B2
7094257 Mujwid et al. Aug 2006 B2
7156876 Moumene et al. Jan 2007 B2
7211112 Baynham et al. May 2007 B2
7217293 Branch May 2007 B2
7220280 Kast et al. May 2007 B2
7223292 Messerli et al. May 2007 B2
7226483 Gerber et al. Jun 2007 B2
7235101 Berry et al. Jun 2007 B2
7300440 Zdeblick Nov 2007 B2
7326248 Michelson Feb 2008 B2
7445636 Michelson Nov 2008 B2
7503933 Michelson Mar 2009 B2
7507241 Levy et al. Mar 2009 B2
7517363 Rogers Mar 2009 B2
7569054 Michelson Aug 2009 B2
7569074 Eisermann et al. Aug 2009 B2
7618458 Biedermann et al. Nov 2009 B2
7621950 Globerman et al. Nov 2009 B1
7621960 Boyd et al. Nov 2009 B2
7691147 Gutlin et al. Apr 2010 B2
7703727 Selness Apr 2010 B2
7722612 Sala et al. May 2010 B2
7722674 Grotz May 2010 B1
7749270 Peterman Jul 2010 B2
7771473 Thramann Aug 2010 B2
7785368 Schaller Aug 2010 B2
7789914 Michelson Sep 2010 B2
7799083 Smith et al. Sep 2010 B2
7819921 Grotz Oct 2010 B2
7824445 Biro et al. Nov 2010 B2
7837734 Zucherman et al. Nov 2010 B2
7846206 Oglaza et al. Dec 2010 B2
7850733 Baynham et al. Dec 2010 B2
7854766 Moskowitz et al. Dec 2010 B2
7857840 Krebs Dec 2010 B2
7874980 Sonnenschein et al. Jan 2011 B2
7879098 Simmons Feb 2011 B1
7887589 Glenn et al. Feb 2011 B2
7892239 Warnick Feb 2011 B2
7909870 Kraus Mar 2011 B2
7922729 Michelson Apr 2011 B2
7951199 Miller May 2011 B2
7985231 Sankaran Jul 2011 B2
7993403 Foley et al. Aug 2011 B2
8021424 Beger et al. Sep 2011 B2
8021426 Segal et al. Sep 2011 B2
8025697 McClellan et al. Sep 2011 B2
8034109 Zwirkoski Oct 2011 B2
8043381 Hestad et al. Oct 2011 B2
8062375 Glerum et al. Nov 2011 B2
8075621 Michelson Dec 2011 B2
8105382 Olmos et al. Jan 2012 B2
8114088 Miller Feb 2012 B2
8177812 Sankaran May 2012 B2
8192495 Simpson et al. Jun 2012 B2
8221501 Eisermann et al. Jul 2012 B2
8221502 Branch Jul 2012 B2
8231681 Castleman et al. Jul 2012 B2
8236058 Fabian et al. Aug 2012 B2
8241358 Butler et al. Aug 2012 B2
8257442 Edie et al. Sep 2012 B2
8262666 Baynham et al. Sep 2012 B2
8267939 Cipoletti et al. Sep 2012 B2
8273128 Oh et al. Sep 2012 B2
8287599 McGuckin Oct 2012 B2
8303663 Jimenez et al. Nov 2012 B2
8323345 Sledge Dec 2012 B2
8328852 Zehavi et al. Dec 2012 B2
8337559 Hansell et al. Dec 2012 B2
8353961 McClintock Jan 2013 B2
8382842 Greenhalgh et al. Feb 2013 B2
8398713 Weiman Mar 2013 B2
8403990 Dryer et al. Mar 2013 B2
8409291 Blackwell et al. Apr 2013 B2
8435298 Weiman May 2013 B2
8454617 Schaller Jun 2013 B2
8486148 Butler et al. Jul 2013 B2
8491657 Attia et al. Jul 2013 B2
8491659 Weiman Jul 2013 B2
8506635 Palmatier et al. Aug 2013 B2
8518087 Morgenstern et al. Aug 2013 B2
8518120 Glerum et al. Aug 2013 B2
8551173 Lechmann et al. Oct 2013 B2
8556979 Glerum et al. Oct 2013 B2
8568481 Olmos et al. Oct 2013 B2
8579977 Fabian Nov 2013 B2
8579981 Lim Nov 2013 B2
8591585 McLaughlin et al. Nov 2013 B2
8603170 Cipoletti et al. Dec 2013 B2
8623091 Suedkamp et al. Jan 2014 B2
8628576 Triplett et al. Jan 2014 B2
8628578 Miller et al. Jan 2014 B2
8632595 Weiman Jan 2014 B2
8663329 Ernst Mar 2014 B2
8668740 Rhoda et al. Mar 2014 B2
8679183 Glerum et al. Mar 2014 B2
8685098 Glerum et al. Apr 2014 B2
8696751 Ashley et al. Apr 2014 B2
8709086 Glerum et al. Apr 2014 B2
8715351 Pinto May 2014 B1
8721723 Hansell et al. May 2014 B2
8728160 Globerman et al. May 2014 B2
8753398 Gordon et al. Jun 2014 B2
8771360 Jimenez et al. Jul 2014 B2
8778025 Ragab et al. Jul 2014 B2
8795366 Varela Aug 2014 B2
8828085 Jensen Sep 2014 B1
8845731 Weiman Sep 2014 B2
8845732 Weiman Sep 2014 B2
8845734 Weiman Sep 2014 B2
8852279 Weiman Oct 2014 B2
8864833 Glerum et al. Oct 2014 B2
8888853 Glerum et al. Nov 2014 B2
8888854 Glerum et al. Nov 2014 B2
8900307 Hawkins et al. Dec 2014 B2
8926704 Glerum Jan 2015 B2
8936641 Cain Jan 2015 B2
8940052 Lechmann et al. Jan 2015 B2
8979860 Voellmicke Mar 2015 B2
9039771 Glerum et al. May 2015 B2
9091488 Postma et al. Jul 2015 B2
9095446 Landry et al. Aug 2015 B2
9095447 Barreiro et al. Aug 2015 B2
20020010070 Cales et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020068976 Jackson Jun 2002 A1
20020068977 Jackson Jun 2002 A1
20020128715 Bryan et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020128716 Cohen et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138146 Jackson Sep 2002 A1
20020151976 Foley et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020165612 Gerber et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030004575 Erickson Jan 2003 A1
20030004576 Thalgott Jan 2003 A1
20030023305 McKay Jan 2003 A1
20030040799 Boyd et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030065396 Michelson Apr 2003 A1
20030078667 Manasas et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030130739 Gerbec et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030135275 Garcia Jul 2003 A1
20030139812 Garcia Jul 2003 A1
20030139813 Messerli et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030204261 Eiserman Oct 2003 A1
20030233145 Landry et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040030387 Landry et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040064144 Johnson et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040087947 Lim May 2004 A1
20040088055 Hanson et al. May 2004 A1
20040127991 Ferree Jul 2004 A1
20040153065 Lim Aug 2004 A1
20040153156 Cohen et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040162618 Mujwid et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040172133 Gerber et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040186570 Rapp Sep 2004 A1
20040186577 Ferree Sep 2004 A1
20040230309 DiMauro Nov 2004 A1
20050019365 Frauchiger et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050038515 Kunzler Feb 2005 A1
20050113916 Branch May 2005 A1
20050113917 Chae et al. May 2005 A1
20050125062 Biedermann et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050165485 Trieu Jul 2005 A1
20050222681 Richley et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050256576 Moskowitz et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050261769 Moskowitz et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050278026 Gordon et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060058876 McKinley Mar 2006 A1
20060058880 Wysocki Mar 2006 A1
20060100706 Shadduck et al. May 2006 A1
20060122701 Kiester Jun 2006 A1
20060122703 Aebi et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060129244 Ensign Jun 2006 A1
20060136062 DiNello et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142858 Colleran et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060206207 Dryer et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060235531 Buettner Oct 2006 A1
20060253201 McLuen Nov 2006 A1
20060265075 Baumgartner et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060265077 Zwirkoski Nov 2006 A1
20070010886 Banick et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070055377 Hanson et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070118222 Lang May 2007 A1
20070149978 Shezifi et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070173939 Kim et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070173940 Hestad et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070178222 Storey et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070191959 Hartmann et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070198089 Moskowitz et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208423 Messerli et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070219634 Greenhalgh et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070233244 Lopez et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070270968 Baynham et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276375 Rapp Nov 2007 A1
20070299521 Glenn Dec 2007 A1
20080009877 Sankaran et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080015701 Garcia et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080021556 Edie Jan 2008 A1
20080021558 Thramann Jan 2008 A1
20080027550 Link et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080033440 Moskowitz et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080058944 Duplessis et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065219 Dye Mar 2008 A1
20080082173 Delurio et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080132934 Reilly Jun 2008 A1
20080140207 Olmos Jun 2008 A1
20080147193 Matthis et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080154377 Voellmicke et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080161927 Savage Jul 2008 A1
20080167657 Greenhalgh Jul 2008 A1
20080177388 Patterson et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080183204 Greenhalgh et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080195209 Garcia et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080243251 Stad et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080243254 Butler Oct 2008 A1
20080249622 Gray Oct 2008 A1
20080281425 Thalgott Nov 2008 A1
20090005873 Slivka et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090030423 Puno Jan 2009 A1
20090054991 Biyani Feb 2009 A1
20090076610 Afzal Mar 2009 A1
20090099568 Lowry et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090105712 Dauster Apr 2009 A1
20090112320 Kraus Apr 2009 A1
20090112324 Refai et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090164020 Janowski Jun 2009 A1
20090177284 Rogers et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090198339 Kleiner Aug 2009 A1
20090222096 Trieu Sep 2009 A1
20090222099 Liu et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090234398 Chirico et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090240335 Arcenio et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090248159 Aflatoon Oct 2009 A1
20090292361 Lopez et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100016905 Greenhalgh et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100069914 Puno Mar 2010 A1
20100076559 Bagga Mar 2010 A1
20100114105 Butters May 2010 A1
20100179594 Theofilos et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100204795 Greenhalgh Aug 2010 A1
20100234956 Attia et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100262240 Chavatte et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100286783 Lechmann et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100324607 Davis Dec 2010 A1
20110004308 Marino et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110004310 Michelson Jan 2011 A1
20110015747 McManus et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110029082 Hall Feb 2011 A1
20110035011 Cain Feb 2011 A1
20110093074 Glerum et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110130835 Ashley et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110130838 Morgenstern Jun 2011 A1
20110144753 Marchek et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110172716 Glerum Jul 2011 A1
20110270261 Mast et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110282453 Greenhalgh et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110301711 Palmatier et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110301712 Palmatier et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120004726 Greenhalgh et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120004732 Goel et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120022654 Farris et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120029636 Ragab et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120071977 Oglaza et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120071980 Purcell et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120083889 Purcell et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120123546 Medina May 2012 A1
20120185049 Varela Jul 2012 A1
20120197403 Merves Aug 2012 A1
20120197405 Cuevas et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120226357 Varela Sep 2012 A1
20120232552 Morgenstern et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120265309 Glerum et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120290097 Cipoletti et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120310350 Farris et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120310352 DiMauro et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130030536 Rhoda et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130085572 Glerum et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130085574 Sledge Apr 2013 A1
20130116791 Theofilos May 2013 A1
20130123924 Butler et al. May 2013 A1
20130123927 Malandain May 2013 A1
20130138214 Greenhalgh et al. May 2013 A1
20130144387 Walker et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130144388 Emery et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130158663 Miller et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130158664 Palmatier et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130158667 Tabor et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130158668 Nichols et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130158669 Sungarian et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130173004 Greenhalgh et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130190876 Drochner et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130190877 Medina Jul 2013 A1
20130204371 McLuen et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130211525 McLuen et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130211526 Alheidt et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130310939 Fabian et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140039622 Glerum et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140046333 Johnson et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140058513 Gahman et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140067073 Hauck Mar 2014 A1
20140114423 Suedkamp et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140128977 Glerum et al. May 2014 A1
20140135934 Hansell et al. May 2014 A1
20140142706 Hansell et al. May 2014 A1
20140163683 Seifert et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140172106 To et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140180421 Glerum et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140249629 Moskowitz et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140249630 Weiman Sep 2014 A1
20140257484 Flower et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140257486 Alheidt Sep 2014 A1
20140303731 Glerum et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140303732 Rhoda et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140324171 Glerum et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150045894 Hawkins et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150094812 Marden et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150094813 Lechmann et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150157470 Voellmicke et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150173916 Cain et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150216671 Cain et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150216672 Cain et al. Aug 2015 A1
20160317317 Marchek et al. Mar 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (66)
Number Date Country
101909548 Dec 2010 CN
2804936 Aug 1979 DE
3911610 Oct 1990 DE
4012622 Jul 1997 DE
202008001079 Mar 2008 DE
282161 Sep 1988 EP
678489 Oct 1995 EP
1290985 Mar 2003 EP
1532949 May 2005 EP
1541096 Jun 2005 EP
1683593 Jul 2006 EP
1698305 Aug 2007 EP
1843723 Mar 2010 EP
2368529 Sep 2011 EP
2237748 Sep 2012 EP
2764851 Aug 2014 EP
2718635 Oct 1995 FR
2730159 Aug 1996 FR
2874814 Mar 2006 FR
2003-526457 Sep 2003 JP
2006-516456 Jul 2006 JP
2011-509766 Mar 2011 JP
WO 1994004100 Mar 1994 WO
WO 1995031158 Nov 1995 WO
WO 9700054 Jan 1997 WO
WO 1999053871 Oct 1999 WO
WO 2000012033 Mar 2000 WO
WO 2000074605 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0101895 Jan 2001 WO
WO 200053127 Jan 2001 WO
WO 2001001893 Jan 2001 WO
WO 2001017464 Mar 2001 WO
WO 2005112834 Dec 2005 WO
WO 2006047587 May 2006 WO
WO 2006058281 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2006065419 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2006081843 Aug 2006 WO
WO 2007028098 Mar 2007 WO
WO 2007048012 Apr 2007 WO
WO 2008044057 Apr 2008 WO
WO 2007009107 Aug 2008 WO
WO 2009092102 Jul 2009 WO
WO 2009064787 Aug 2009 WO
WO 2009124269 Oct 2009 WO
WO 2009143496 Nov 2009 WO
WO 2010068725 Jun 2010 WO
WO 2010148112 Dec 2010 WO
WO 2011142761 Nov 2011 WO
WO 2012009152 Jan 2012 WO
WO 2012089317 Jul 2012 WO
WO 2012135764 Oct 2012 WO
WO 2013006669 Jan 2013 WO
WO 2013023096 Feb 2013 WO
WO 2013025876 Feb 2013 WO
WO 2013043850 May 2013 WO
WO 2013062903 May 2013 WO
WO 2013082184 Jun 2013 WO
WO 2013158294 Oct 2013 WO
WO 2013173767 Nov 2013 WO
WO 2013184946 Dec 2013 WO
WO 2014018098 Jan 2014 WO
WO 2014026007 Feb 2014 WO
WO 2014035962 Mar 2014 WO
WO 2014088521 Jun 2014 WO
WO 2014116891 Jul 2014 WO
WO 2014144696 Sep 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (10)
Entry
Chiang, Biomechanical Comparison of Instrumented Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with One or Two Cages by Finite Element Analysis, Spine, 2006, pp. E682-E689, vol. 31(19), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Folman, Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Disc Disease Using a Minimally Invasive B-Twin Expandable Spinal Spacer, Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 2003, pp. 455-460, vol. 16(5).
Gore, Technique of Cervical Interbody Fusion, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1984, pp. 191-195, No. 188.
Hunt, Expanable cage placement via a posterolateral approach in lumbar spine reconstructions, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2006, pp. 271-274, vol. 5.
Krbec, [Replacement of the vertebral body with an expansion implant (Synex)], Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2002, pp. 158-162, vol. 69(3).
Polikeit, The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine, Eur Spine J, 2003, pp. 556-561, vol. 12.
Shin, Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion via a Unilateral Approach, Yonsei Medical Journal, 2006, pp. 319-325, vol. 47(3).
Hoogland, T. et al., Total Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Replacement: testing of a New Articulating Space in Human Cadaver Spines—24 1 Annual ORS, Dallas TX, Feb. 21-23, 1978, 8 pages.
Spine Solutions Brochure—Prodisc 2001, 16 pages.
Link SB Charite Brochure—Intervertebral Prosthesis 1988, 29 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170319356 A1 Nov 2017 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 14623982 Feb 2015 US
Child 15653586 US
Parent 12822739 Jun 2010 US
Child 14623982 US