Patent Application
20100222994
The present invention pertains to control of transporters, and more particularly to devices and methods for providing user input with respect to either directional or velocity control of such transporters (having any number of ground-contacting elements) and, additionally employing wireless telemetry.
Dynamically stabilized transporters refer to personal transporters having a control system that actively maintains the stability of the transporter while the transporter is operating. The control system maintains the stability of the transporter by continuously sensing the orientation of the transporter, determining the corrective action to maintain stability, and commanding the wheel motors to make the corrective action.
For vehicles that maintain a stable footprint, coupling between steering-control, on the one hand, and control of the forward motion of the vehicles is not an issue of concern since, under typical road conditions, stability is maintained by virtue of the wheels being in contact with the ground throughout the course of a turn. In a balancing transporter, however, any torque applied to one or more wheels affects the stability of the transporter. Coupling between steering and balancing control mechanisms is one subject of U.S. Pat. No. 6,789,640, which is incorporated herein by reference. Directional inputs that advantageously provide intuitive and natural integration of human control with the steering requirements of a balancing vehicle are the subject of the present invention.
The invention, in one aspect, features a method for controlling yaw of a balancing transporter. The method involves receiving an input from a user based on a position of a member with respect to a fiducial axis. The method also involves calculating a rate of change of the position of the member with respect to the fiducial axis. The method also involves generating a yaw command signal based on at least the position of the member and the rate of change of the position of the member which is weighted based on the level of experience of the user.
In some embodiments, the rate of change of the position of the member is weighted to reduce its effect on the yaw command signal for a beginner user. In some embodiments, the rate of change of the position of the member is weighted to increase its effect on the yaw command signal for an experienced user. In some embodiments, the user provides an input signal to the transporter to vary the weighting of the rate of change of the position of the member.
The invention, in another aspect, features a balancing transporter that includes a platform for supporting a load and at least one primary ground-contacting element. The transporter also includes an actuator for applying torque to the at least one primary ground-contacting element for propelling the transporter with respect to a surface. The transporter also includes a controller for controlling the actuator, the controller comprises an input for receiving specification by a user of a desired direction of travel based on a position of a member with respect to a fiducial axis, a differentiator for calculating a rate of change of the position of the member with respect to the fiducial axis, and a processor for generating a yaw command signal based at least on the position of the member and the rate of change of the position of the member which is weighted based on the level of experience of the user.
In some embodiments, the rate of change of the position of the member is weighted to reduce its effect on the yaw command signal for a beginner user. In some embodiments, the rate of change of the position of the member is weighted to increase its effect on the yaw command signal for an experienced user.
The transporter can include an input device for generating at least one user-specified signal corresponding to at least one function of the transporter. In some embodiments, the input device provides the at least one user-specified signal to the transporter to vary the weighting of the rate of change of the position of the member used in generating the yaw command signal. In some embodiments, the transporter includes a transceiver for establishing wireless remote communication between the input device and the controller of the transporter. In some embodiments, the transporter includes a telemetry unit adapted to receive the at least one user-specified signal from the input device.
The invention, in another aspect, features a balancing transporter that includes a platform for supporting a load and at least one primary ground-contacting element. The transporter also includes an actuator for applying torque to the at least one primary ground-contacting element for propelling the transporter with respect to a surface. The transporter also includes a controller for controlling the actuator. The transporter also includes a member for a user to specify a direction of travel of the transporter based on a position of the member in an inertial frame of reference. The transporter also includes a processor having an input for receiving the user specified direction of travel and for generating a yaw command signal based at least on the position of the member.
In some embodiments, the inertial frame of reference is referenced to a local vertical direction. In some embodiments, the member is a handle pivotable about a pivot axis fixed with respect to the platform. In some embodiments, the member is biased to a central position corresponding to travel of the transporter in a forward direction. In some embodiments, the transporter includes a torsional bushing that biases the member to the central position. In some embodiments, the torsional bushing includes an elastomeric membrane.
The invention, in another aspect, relates to a method for controlling yaw of a balancing transporter. The method involves receiving an input from a user specifying a direction of travel for the transporter based on a position of a member in an inertial frame of reference. The method also involves generating a yaw command signal based on at least the position of the member and the rate of change of the position of the member which is weighted based on the level of experience of the user.
In some embodiments, the inertial frame of reference is referenced to a local vertical direction.
In accordance with preferred embodiments of the present invention, a controller is provided that may be employed for providing user input of a desired direction of motion or orientation for a transporter. The controller has an input for receiving specification by a user of a value based on a detected body orientation of the user.
User-specified input may be conveyed by the user using any of a large variety of input modalities, including: ultrasonic body position sensing; foot force sensing; handlebar lean; active handlebar; mechanical sensing of body position; and linear slide directional input.
In those embodiments of the invention wherein the transporter is capable of balanced operation on one or more ground-contacting elements, an input is provided for receiving specification from the user of a desired direction of motion, or a desired velocity value based on a detected body orientation of the user. A processor generates a command signal based at least on the user-specified direction and velocity value in conjunction with a pitch command signal that is based on a pitch error in such a manner as to maintain balance of the transporter in the course of achieving the specified direction and velocity. The input of a desired direction may also include a user-specified yaw value, yaw rate value, or fore/aft direction.
In various other embodiments of the invention, the controller has a summer for differencing an instantaneous yaw value from the user-specified yaw value to generate a yaw error value such that the yaw command signal generated by the processor is based at least in part on the yaw error value. The input for receiving user specification may include a pressure sensor disposed to detect orientation of the user, an ultrasonic sensor disposed to detect orientation of the user, or a force sensor disposed on a platform supporting the user for detecting weight distribution of the user. In yet other embodiments, the input for receiving user specification includes a shaft disposed in a plane transverse to an axis characterizing rotation of the two laterally disposed wheels, the desired direction and velocity specified on the basis of orientation of the shaft.
In accordance with further embodiments of the invention, the balancing transporter may includes a handlebar, and the controller may further have a powered pivot for positioning the handlebar based at least upon one of lateral acceleration and roll angle of the transporter. In particular, the controller may have a position loop for commanding a handlebar position substantially proportional to the difference in the square of the velocity of a first wheel and the square of the velocity of a second wheel.
In accordance with yet other embodiments of the invention, an apparatus is provided for prompting a rider to be positioned on a vehicle in such a manner as to reduce lateral instability due to lateral acceleration of the vehicle. The apparatus has an input for receiving specification by the rider of a desired direction of travel and an indicating means for reflecting to the rider a desired instantaneous body orientation based at least on current lateral acceleration of the vehicle. The indicating means may include a handlebar pivotable with respect to the vehicle, the handlebar driven in response to vehicle turning.
The foregoing features of the invention will be more readily understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
A personal transporter may be said to act as ‘balancing’ if it is capable of operation on one or more wheels but would be unable to stand on the wheels but for operation of a control loop governing operation of the wheels. A balancing personal transporter lacks static stability but is dynamically balanced. The wheels, or other ground-contacting elements, that provide contact between such a personal transporter and the ground or other underlying surface, and minimally support the transporter with respect to tipping during routine operation, are referred to herein as ‘primary ground-contacting elements.
Different numbers of wheels or other ground-contacting members may advantageously be used in various embodiments of the invention as particularly suited to varying applications. Thus, within the scope of the present invention, the number of ground-contacting members may be any number equal to, or greater than, one. A personal transporter may be said to act as ‘balancing’ if it is capable of operation on one or more wheels (or other ground-contacting elements) but would be unable to stand stably on the wheels but for operation of a control loop governing operation of the wheels. The wheels, or other ground-contacting elements, that provide contact between such a personal transporter and the ground or other underlying surface, and minimally support the transporter with respect to tipping during routine operation, may be referred to herein as ‘primary ground-contacting elements.’ A transporter such as transporter 10 may advantageously be used as a mobile work platform or a recreational vehicle such as a golf cart, or as a delivery vehicle.
The term “lean”, as used herein, refers to the angle with respect to the local vertical direction of a line that passes through the center of mass of the system and the center of rotation of a ground-contacting element supporting the system above the ground at a given moment. The term “system” refers to all mass caused to move due to motion of the ground-contacting elements with respect to the surface over which the vehicle is moving.
“Stability” as used in this description and in any appended claims refers to the mechanical condition of an operating position with respect to which the system will naturally return if the system is perturbed away from the operating position in any respect.
One mechanism for providing user input for a yaw control system of a personal transporter is described in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/308,850. As described therein and as shown in
With particular reference to
From
Several alternatives to a twist grip input device for specifying user directional or velocity input are now described.
Body Position Sensing
In accordance with various embodiments of the present invention, a device which detects the body position of the rider is employed to control fore/aft motion or steering of a transporter. For purposes of yaw control, in accordance with various embodiments of the invention, sensors detect whether the hips or shoulders of a rider, shown schematically from above in
Any method of sensing of body position to control vehicle yaw or fore/aft motion is within the scope of the present invention and of any appended claims. One embodiment of the invention, described with reference to
In one embodiment, an ultrasonic beacon is worn by the rider, and an array of receivers mounted to the machine detect the position of the rider. Time of flight information is obtained from transmitter to each receiver and used to calculate the lateral position of the user with respect to the center of the machine. To turn the machine to the right, the user leans to the right, and similarly for turning left. In addition to the intuitive appeal of a mechanism which translates body motion to transporter control, as in the case of fore-aft motion control of a personal transporter of the sort described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,302,230, the body-control modality also advantageously positions the user's center of gravity (CG) correctly for high speed turns.
A body lean system described with reference to
The receiver array is a bar with receivers mounted at various locations. The ultrasound receivers are also mounted in small pieces of Delrin®, with the electronics located behind the bar at each location. To increase the size of the reception cone, 2 U.S. receivers are used at each location, one mounted facing straight out and the other at 45 degrees to that. For the outboard sensors, the 45-degree receiver faced inward and for the inboard receivers, the 45 degree receiver faced outwards. This makes it possible to use the two outboard receivers (left and right) for location when the rider is at the center of the machine, but as the rider moves right, the two right sensors take over, and the same when the rider moves to the left.
An ultrasonic rangefinder, such as a Devantech Model SRF-04, may provide both the transmitter and receiver functions and circuitry, however modifications are within the scope of the present invention. The beacon portion consolidates three drivers onto a single board. In addition, the microcontroller code residing on the transmitter boards allows the board to transmit continuously.
The board designed to interface to the computer was breadboarded with microcontrollers of the same type as the Devantech boards. The function of this board s to create a square wave that represents the time difference of arrival between the RF pulse and the ultrasonic pulse (wave goes high when the RF pulse arrives, and low when the US pulse arrives), and correctly interface this wave to the computer circuitry. Since RF travels at the speed of light, and sound at the speed of sound, this scheme results in an accurate ultrasonic time of flight (TOF) signal.
With reference to
When a balancing transporter is traveling at any significant speed, the rider needs to lean into a commanded turn in order to counteract the centripetal accelerations due to the turn. This machine uses the body location sensors to turn the machine. When the rider is centered on the machine, no turn input is generated. When the rider leans to the left, a left turn is commanded, and the same for the right. Thus the turn is not initiated until the users CG is properly located. In addition, by knowing the users exact CG location (as by positioning the transmitter at the waist of the rider), the system is able to exactly match the wheel speed/turn rate to the angle the user is at, theoretically exactly canceling out the forces acting on the body. Thus the amount of turn is tuned for the CG location of the rider and wheel speed.
In accordance with the invention, time-of flight (TOF) information from an ultrasonic transmitter is transmitted to at least 2 ultrasonic receivers. Time of flight was calculated from the difference of a RF received pulse edge to a U.S. received pulse edge. Since the speed of sound is substantially a constant (within the operation of the machine), distance can be calculated from its time of flight from transmitter to receiver. The law of cosines along with the known distances of the receivers from center and from each other is then used to calculate the location of the transmitter in the lateral direction. Because of the redundant receivers, the lateral location is unique, and immune to changes in height and fore/aft distance from the bar (unless this change resulted in a loss of line-of sight (LOS).
Feet Force
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, yaw control input is provided to a transporter by sensing the rider's weight distribution by using force sensors on the foot plate. In order to steer, the rider leans in the direction of desired turn. Lean, right: turn right; lean left: turn left. Many variations can be derived from a base system containing many force sensors located at the foot plate.
A PCB board provides all signal conditioning for the force sensors. The sensor signals are output from the PCB board as zero to five volt analog signals. Spare A/D inputs on the amplifiers are used to read in the 8 analog signals and provide an 8-bit count to the software for each sensor.
The primary variation implemented and tested uses sensors on the left and sensors on the right sides of the foot plate. When the person leans to the right, the right sensor signals become large, indicating a turn to the right. When the person leans to the left, the left sensor signals become large, indicating a turn to the left. A special foot plate was constructed to allow force distribution to be measured at four corners of a rigid plate.
The resulting system is advantageously very maneuverable at low speeds and a rider may became more proficient at this yaw input than the twist grip yaw input. There is a tradeoff between the bandwidth of the device that enables the system handle disturbances better, and the perceived responsiveness of the system.
As a natural movement, when turning on a personal transporter, a user tends to shift weight in the direction of the turn. The reason for this is the centripetal force generated by turning tends to push the person off the transporter. The same user movement is required when riding a 3-wheel or a 4-wheel all-terrain-vehicle (ATV). As a result, a natural input to turn that encourages good user position is to turn right when the user shifts their weight to the right. In this configuration, the user is in the ideal position to make a right turn.
Skiers and skaters tend to push off with their right foot to turn left. The reason for this is they shift their weight distribution from the right to the left by using their feet. On a personal transporter in accordance with the present invention, users needs to shift their weight from right to left not using their feet, but using the handlebars for this input device. If the sign were reversed to accommodate the skiers and skaters' preference to lean right and turn left, an unstable system would result. As the user leans right, the transporter turns left, generating a centripetal force that pushes the user more to right, generating more left turn command.
Referring to
The sensors are located under a metal foot-plate, one in each corner, as shown in
The overall yaw command from the sensor measurements to the yaw command delivered to the control system is shown in
Since a user often shifts his weight slightly while standing in place, a deadband is added to the sensor processing. As shown in
To calculate the yaw command from the sensors, the following equation is used: 1. cmd=(right front+right rear)2−(left front+left rear)2,
where ψ&cmd is the commanded rate of change in yaw.
Each sensor provides 0 Volts, or 0 counts with no weight on it, and 5 Volts, or 255 counts fully loaded. A deadband of around 40 counts provided smooth enough control with enough room to feel comfortable. Additionally, filters may be employed to filter the command signal, with passbands typically centered from about 0.5 Hz to about 3 Hz.
When moving in reverse, if the same equations are used to generate the yaw command, the resulting system has positive feedback. When the transporter performs an “S-turn”, in reverse, if the user leans to the right, the transporter will turn to the left and create a centripetal force on the user, pushing the user to the right. To solve this issue, a “C-turn” may be implemented. A ramp function is used to reverse the yaw command when the transporter begins moving in reverse. To keep a consistent turning motion, when turning in place, the ramp only switches the direction of the yaw command when it moves in reverse.
ψ&cmd=ψ&cmd+2·rampRevLPF·ψ&cmd
The rampRev signal is lowpass filtered at 5.0 Hz to smooth the effects of the ramp.
A brake switch, such as brake switch 7 (shown in
Handlebar Lean
One of the key properties of a good directional input device is its ability to provide directional input while managing lateral acceleration. High lateral acceleration turns require the user to lean into the turn to keep from falling off or tipping over the transporter. An optimal directional input device will require the user to have their body properly positioned when commanding a directional input. A twist grip yaw input, such as discussed above with reference to
Another method of encouraging proper body positioning is to make one or more handlebars into a joystick. By pivoting the bar near the base of the machine, the user can move his or her body at high speeds and merely hold onto the handlebar and command an input. When properly tuned, the user's body is already in position to react against the lateral acceleration at the initiation of the turn, reducing the likelihood of an improperly coordinated turn.
In the handlebar lean machine, the yaw input is proportional to the handlebar angle with respect to the chassis. Preferably, the pivot axis is mounted as low as practical on the transporter ground-contacting module in order to allow the bar motion to follow the users body motion naturally, since a person leans most stably by pivoting at the ankles. In other words, a low pivot handlebar tracks the body kinematics. In this embodiment, the yaw input is converted into a yaw command using standard personal transporter algorithms, which apply a fixed gain to yaw input at low speeds, but scale the gain at higher speed to make the yaw input correspond to lateral acceleration instead of yaw rate. This works well with the handlebar lean device, since the desired lean angle is roughly proportional to lateral acceleration. The result is a very natural input method, where the user “thinks” right or left via leaning, and the machine follows.
ψ&cmd=K(ΦHB−ΦRoll)
where K is a constant;
ΦHB is the handlebar angle with respect to the platform;
ΦRoll is the platform lean with respect to gravity;
ψ&cmd is the yaw command.
Other embodiments of the invention may have an inclined or horizontally mounted pivot handlebar. In machines with inclined pivots, the angle of the pivot with respect to the contact patch and surface provided interesting turning dynamics. Specifically, the axis of rotation may affect the dynamics of turning on a slope or on a flat surface. Preferably, the machine has a low horizontal pivot. A horizontal pivot can easily track the kinematics of the body during a turn.
In accordance with yet other embodiment of the invention, with the direction of travel as the reference point, the pivoted handlebar may be either mounted in the front or the rear of the transporter. The configuration of a rear mounted pivot handlebar enables a user to steer the transporter with other parts of the body such as the knees, in addition to using a limb coupled to the handlebar. Furthermore, the transporter may include a feature that disables the lean steer when a user is mounting or dismounting. The feature may be activated when the transporter determines that a user is partially on/off the platform such that the transporter may not turn into or away from the user while mounting or dismounting.
Of the various mechanisms suited to provide for handlebar lean, a first is described with reference to
Preferably, the motion of the handlebar is not biased to a central position. In embodiments where the handlebar is not biased to a central position, there is no preloading around the center and thus a user can precisely and accurately steer the transporter.
In accordance with an embodiment depicted in
Yet a further embodiment of the invention is depicted in
A handlebar lean device in accordance with a further embodiment of the invention features a pivot mechanism shown in
The shocks are adjustable in both spring constant and damping. The spring constant is adjustable by pressurizing the shock air reservoir. The damping adjustment is made with a knob that varies an orifice size internal to the shock. Shock absorbers 74 are shown in
With the stiffest cam installed and the shock absorbers at ambient pressure, a preload of approximately 8 lbs. results, as measured at the handlebar. Approximately 40 pounds of force are required to deflect the handlebar to its full 15° travel.
One issue that must be addressed in handlebar lean control is the effect of terrain sensitivity. If the machine is driven over obstacles or rough terrain, a roll disturbance is forced on the machine/rider system since the resulting change in position of the user may cause an unintended yaw input is put into the system. Yaw control modalities that depend upon the overall body lean of a standing person are prone to be more sensitive to terrain than, say, yaw control by means of a twist grip.
To combat this roll sensitivity, a roll compensation algorithm may be employed. In such an algorithm, the yaw input is modified to compensate for the roll angle of the chassis, making the yaw input the angle of the handlebar with respect to gravity. Since it is easier for the user to maintain body position with respect to gravity rather than the platform, this facilitates rejection of roll disturbances.
In accordance with certain embodiments of the invention, a method for reducing terrain sensitivity employs an algorithm for filtering yaw inputs based on the roll rate of the chassis. The instantaneous rate of rolling, referred to as Roll Rate, is readily available from the Pitch State Estimator, such as that described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,332,103, which derives the orientation of the transporter based on one or more gyroscopes, an inclinometer, or combinations of the above. Large roll transients cause the rider to be accelerated and, if the roll transients were to be rigidly coupled, through the rider, to the yaw control mechanism, they would cause unintended yaw input.
There are two distinct parts of the solution: rejecting terrain while riding straight and rejecting terrain while turning; the first is a special case of the second. While disabling yaw during periods of large roll rates would solve the problem for motion in a fixed direction, more input is required in order to decouple roll from steered motion.
An unknown input is an estimate of the “intended” yaw input from the rider, i.e. the intention, say, to ride around in a 20′ circle. While this information is not directly available, it can be usefully inferred from the history of the yaw input. Simply low-pass filtering the data provides an estimate of yaw input. However, this causes a response delay that is noticeable to the rider. On the other hand, if low-pass filtered data are used only when high roll rates are present, the rider is less likely to notice the delay. The algorithm, then, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, employs a mixer, controlled by roll rate, between direct yaw input and a heavily filtered version.
A transfer function models the amount of roll rate that will couple into the yaw signal. It is a function of various factors, including the design of the yaw input, the rider's ability, and how the rider is holding on to the yaw input. By using this mixing method, the transfer function can largely be ignored or at most minimized through tuning
The four main tuning points are: How fast the mixer slews to the filtered version, how fast the mixer slews back, what threshold the mix starts and ends, and the corner frequency of the low pass filter (LPF) on yaw input. There are limits to the amount of uncommanded yaw that can be removed due to setting the mix threshold. By setting it high there is more un-commanded yaw, by setting it low there are more false trips and the rider will begin to notice the time lag on the yaw signal. Setting the LPF frequency also has tradeoffs. If yaw is too heavily filtered, then there will be a noticeable delay and a possibility of yaw transients coupling in from the past. Setting it too low reduces the ability of the mixer to remove the transients.
Referring now to
yaw command=F*Yaw Input+(1−F)*Yaw Filtered,
where F is the mixer function which is a continuously varying signal between 0.0 and 1.0.
In accordance with various further embodiments of the invention, unintended yaw control is reduced while reacting against the shaft to reposition the body of the rider. The center of rotation at the handlebar may be repositioned, allowing the user to pull laterally on the bar without causing any displacement. In another embodiment, shown in
Alternatively, a force or torque input may be used. A lateral force load cell allows the user to torque the bar in order to reposition it. Likewise, a torque sensitive bar may be provided to allow the user to pull laterally on the bar.
Another issue that must be addressed in handlebar lean control is the effect of turning while moving backwards or in reverse. As described supra, the system may deal with lean turning while moving backward, by switching the direction of the yaw command, to perform a “S-turn” or a “C-turn”. Preferably, the system performs a “S-Turn”. The system may further compensate for the dynamics of turning while moving backward by desensitizing the lean steering movement. Desensitizing the lean steering while reversing can advantageously facilitate using the same equations to generate the yaw command, the resulting system has positive feedback.
Any of these foregoing embodiments may be combined, within the scope of the present invention, with a rotary yaw control input device such as that depicted in
Active Handlebar
In accordance with further embodiments of the invention, an active handlebar system provides for active control of the handlebar angle with respect to the chassis. The handlebar is mounted on a powered pivot. The handlebar is positioned with respect to the chassis based on lateral acceleration and roll angle of the chassis. If the user maintains good coupling with the handlebar, the bar provides assistance in positioning their body to improve lateral stability. A skilled user leans automatically with the bar, exerting almost no lateral force. If an unexpected obstacle or turn is made, however, the active bar can provide assistance to even the most experienced operator. This system is also particularly useful on slopes, both while traversing and during turning maneuvers.
In order to keep the user most stable, the bar should be positioned parallel the resultant vector of lateral acceleration and gravity. In the system described here, lateral acceleration was determined only using the wheel velocities, without taking advantage of any other available state estimator information. Lateral acceleration is given by the equation:
alat=ων
Where ω is the yaw rate and ν is the velocity of the transporter. ω is based on the difference in wheel velocities (Vl and Vr) and the wheel track, T.
ν is determined by the average wheel velocity:
Combining these equations gives:
Since tan(alat)≈alat for small angles, the bar position from vertical is proportional to the difference in the square of each wheel speed. This position must be compensated by adding the roil angle of the chassis, which results in a handlebar position based on the vector sum of lateral acceleration and the acceleration due to gravity.
The operation of the active handlebar is further described as follows. The user commands yaw, such as with the rotary yaw input shown in
The active handlebar system uses standard algorithms to control the wheels. The handlebar is controlled with a position loop that commands a position proportional to the difference in the square of the wheel velocities. Although a theoretical gain can be calculated and converted to the proper fixed point units, in practice it was determined empirically.
The position loop is a standard PID loop using motor encoder data for feedback. The tuning objectives are good ramp tracking, minimum settling time, and minimum overshoot. The loop was tuned using a modified triangle wave.
The handlebar controller used the position at startup as the zero (center) position. The user had to position the bar and hold it centered at startup. Absolute position feedback may be provided to allow the bar to self-center.
Some filtering and dead banding are done to the command before commanding the motor. In a specific embodiment, the filtering was ultimately needed to smooth out any noise on the wheel speeds and dead banding was used to keep the bar still when turning in place on slightly inclined terrains. A 1 Hz first order filtered estimate of lateral acceleration is multiplied by a first gain (typically, on the order of 0.001) and roll compensated by adding roll angle multiplied by a second gain (typically, on the order of 0.15). Afterwards a software induced dead band, and later compensation, of 15% of the max motor position command (typically, 400 counts.) The final result is filtered by a 0.2 Hz filter. This filter may be used to round out the knee introduced at the dead band and to slow down the movement of the handlebar.
Further Mechanical Sensing of Body Position
In accordance with other embodiments of the invention, the position of the rider's body, or of one or more parts thereof, may be sensed mechanically as a means to command yaw or fore/aft motion of a personal transporter. One such embodiment has been described with reference to
The yaw input device tracks body position by recording the motion of the right knee as it rotates about a longitudinal axis through the right ankle. The rider interacts with the device through a cuff 910 which fits closely around the upper shin just below the knee. The cuff is height-adjustable and padded to allow a snug fit without discomfort. The cuff is attached via an arm to a pivot ahead of the foot, located such that its axis runs longitudinally in relation to the chassis, and in line with the ankle (Anthropometric data from Dreyfuss Associates' The Measure of Man and Woman suggested the ankle pivot should be approximately 4″ from the baseplate for an average rider wearing shoes). A potentiometer records the angle of the arm in a manner very similar to the twist-grip yaw input device described above with reference to
A mechanical body position yaw input device incorporates a centering mechanism that is described with reference to
In addition to the pivot axis on which the potentiometer is located, there is another non-encoded axis at ankle height, perpendicular to the first, which allows the cuff to move with the knee as the rider bends knees and ankles during active riding. A torsion spring acts about this non-encoded axis to keep the cuff pressed firmly against the rider. The spring is not preloaded and generates approximately 20 kg/mm per degree, such that the rider experiences a force of 1.5 kg at his knee in a typical riding posture (25° forward of unloaded position) and 3 kg at full forward travel) (50°). At full forward position there is a stop which allows the rider to command pitch torque to the chassis through forward knee pressure.
Due to variations in the underlying terrain, there are situations in which the rider's body position does not necessarily correlate to intended yaw input. One situation is traversing a sideslope, during which time the rider will need to lean uphill to stay balanced. Another situation is striking an obstacle with one wheel, which may cause the machine to roll sharply while the rider stays upright. During both of these situations the potentiometer will record that the body position has moved relative to the machine, which is normally interpreted as a yaw command. While terrain-induced body position presents a challenge to a system which translates body position into yaw, steps can be taken to mitigate these situations. A system discussed below addresses the terrain-induced yaw inputs described above with separate algorithms for side slopes and sudden wheel impacts.
On machines with yaw inputs derived from body position it is necessary to compensate for the difference in roll angle to the bodies' natural tendency to line up with gravity. The only exception to this is the case where there is a sufficient restoring force on the yaw input to overcome the rider's natural tendency to keep the yaw input in-line with their body.
In order to roll compensate the yaw input a calculation needs to be made. This calculation entails measuring the amount of roll angle that couples into the yaw input. The following function is used to calculate a roll compensated yaw input:
roll compensated yawinput=yawinput−(Gain_RollContributionToYawInput*roll).
For example: Gain_RollContributionToYawInput=(1.44/1.0), where 1 count of roll gives 1.44 counts of yaw.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, the rider may hit a button which resets their current knee position as neutral.
Although there is no measurable backlash in the centering device, the mechanism can flex before overcoming the centering device preload. This translates to about 1° of knee motion in either direction which does not command a yaw. This can be reduced by increasing the stiffness of the structure relative to the preload. A loose fit between the knee cuff and the knee adds an additional 1-2° of motion that does not produce a signal.
Additionally, the potentiometer may exhibit hysteresis, which may be compensated by addition of a software dead band. Dead band has the advantage of allowing the rider a small amount of motion, which reduces fatigue. However, precision and slalom performance is compromised by dead band. User-adjustable or speed-sensitive deadband may also be embodied.
Asymmetrical gains may be useful to compensate for the asymmetry inherent in measuring the motion of one of two legs. Since body position determines yaw input, appropriate mapping of rider position to lateral acceleration at speed is more significant in this device than in a hand-steered device.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, described with reference to
Another embodiment of the invention, discussed with reference to
Linear Slide Directional Input
The “linear slide” directional input device is a shear force sensitive means of steering a personal transporter. The device has a platform that can slide in the lateral direction of the machine, directly in line with lateral accelerations seen during turning.
During a turn the user feels a lateral acceleration in the vehicle frame of reference. The lateral acceleration causes a shear force between the user and the vehicle, which is reacted through the footplate and the handlebar. Because the user has two points to react this force, one can be used as a directional input driven through the other. In this implementation the user reacts on the handlebar. The linear slide mechanism measures this reaction through displacement of the platform, and uses it as a directional command. This input method is directly coupled to lateral acceleration, with the user modulating the coupling by reacting off the handlebar. At zero lateral acceleration, the user can create a directional input by pushing laterally on the handlebar. At non-zero acceleration, the user's handlebar force adds to the lateral acceleration force to create the input.
The linear slide mechanism was designed to sit on top of the chassis of a personal transporter, replacing the foot mat assembly. It is marginally smaller that the existing foot plate area to allow for plate displacement. The platform wraps around the control shaft base. The maximum platform travel is approx +/−1 inch. The footplate mechanism 950 is shown in
The assembly is clamped to the platform of a human transporter with four blocks that capture the base plate of the slide. The blocks allow the assembly to move vertically in order to activate the rider detect switches. Because the weight of the assembly alone is sufficient to activate the switches, it is counterbalanced with two ball plungers. These insure that the rider detect switches only activate when a rider is on the transporter.
The upper platform rides on ½ inch linear ball bearings which, in turn, ride on a ground rod mounted to the lower platform. A spring and stop arrangement provides preloaded centering force.
A linear potentiometer converts the platform position to an analog voltage, which is input to the user interface circuit board in place of the potentiometer employed in conjunction with the twist grip embodiment described above with reference to
Algorithms for operation of the linear slide yaw input are essentially those of the twist grip yaw input, as described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,789,640, albeit with an opposite yaw gain polarity.
Several embodiments of the invention are related to the device just described. In accordance with one embodiment, individual pivoting footplates are shear sensitive and pivot at a point above the surface of the plate, preferably 4 to 6 inches above the surface. This allows some lateral acceleration coupling, but give the user the ability to stabilize the coupling through leg or ankle rotation.
Alternatively, the linear slide may be moved to the handlebar. This allows a user to use his legs for reacting to lateral accelerations without commanding input. However, since most of the lateral acceleration is reacted in the legs, coupling with lateral acceleration is largely lost by moving the linear slide to the handlebar. The described embodiments of the invention are intended to be merely exemplary and numerous variations and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. In particular, many of the controllers and methods of direction and speed control described herein may be applied advantageously to personal transporters that are not balancing personal transporters. Balancing transporters present particular requirements for combining yaw and balance controls, as discussed in the foregoing description and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,789,640. All such variations and modifications are intended to be within the scope of the present invention as defined in any appended claims.
Handle 16 may also be referred to as a “steering column,” “member” or “stalk,” which terms are used interchangeably herein. In this embodiment of the invention, support platform 12 includes separate left foot plate 18 and right foot plate 19, as further discussed below.
A control loop is provided so that leaning of the subject results in the application of torque to wheel 20 about axis 22 by means of a motor drive 6 depicted schematically in
Different numbers of wheels or other ground-contacting members may advantageously be used in various embodiments of the invention as particularly suited to varying applications. Thus, within the scope of the present invention, the number of ground-contacting members may be any number equal to, or greater than, one. A personal transporter may be said to act as ‘balancing’ if it is capable of operation on one or more wheels (or other ground-contacting elements) but would be unable to stand stably on the wheels but for operation of a control loop governing operation of the wheels. The wheels, or other ground-contacting elements, that provide contact between such a personal transporter and the ground or other underlying surface, and minimally support the transporter with respect to tipping during routine operation, may be referred to herein as ‘primary ground-contacting elements.’ A transporter such as transporter 10 of
One mechanism for providing user input for a yaw control system of a personal transporter is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,789,640, incorporated herein by reference. As described therein, a user mounted on a transporter may provide yaw control input to a yaw controller by rotating a yaw grip assembly.
.
It is to be understood that while, in a preferred embodiment, the user who provides yaw input is the rider aboard the personal transporter, the invention is not to be limited in that regard. For example, in one alternative embodiment, yaw input is provided by a user changing the position of the handle 16 while walking alongside, or in front of, the transporter 10.
The LateralAccelScale function 42 reduces the effect of the yaw input 40 at higher wheel speeds and at higher centripetal acceleration. Feedback 44, used to regulate the commanded yaw velocity, contains a yaw position term 45 to maintain yaw position, a velocity squared term 46 that will attempt to regulate the yaw velocity to zero, and a feedforward term 49 used to provide better yaw command response to the user.
Feedforward term 49 dominates for rapid maneuvers in order to provide a responsive system. The velocity-squared feedback 46 is an example of deviation from linear control theory and has the effect of providing nonlinear yaw velocity damping.
The rate of change in a variable associated with yaw input (such as the handle bar angle about fiducial axis , typically the transporter roll axis, as discussed below) may also be employed as an additional yaw command, and may be derived by means of differentiator 41. The rate of change of the yaw input variable 40 creates a component of the yaw command which “anticipates” the rider lean and is more likely to keep the handle 16 coordinated with the rider and makes the transporter 10 feel more responsive.
The gain 47 associated with the rate-of-change component of the yaw input may be varied, for example, on the basis of the level of experience of the user. In this manner, the yaw command signal is generated based on the position of the handle 16 and the rate of change of the position of the handle 16 which is weighted based on the level of experience of the user. In one embodiment, the value of the gain 47 for an expert is set to be 130% of the value associated with a beginner. Different gain values can be implemented in alternative embodiments of the invention. In some embodiments, the transporter can be configured to allow a user to set multiple levels of experience.
In some embodiments, the rate of change of the position of the handle 16 which is weighted in response to the user selecting or specifying a user proficiency or experience level by, for example, toggling among beginner, intermediate and expert modes of the transporter. Each mode can impose a different, specified operational constraint on the transporter. In some embodiments, the user selects the mode through use of controls or buttons located on the transporter. In some embodiments, the user selects the mode through use of buttons located on a control fob, similarly as discussed herein.
In some embodiments, the rate of change of the position of the handle is weighted to reduce its effect on the yaw command signal for a beginner user. In some embodiments, the rate of change of the position of the handle is weighted to increase its effect on the yaw command signal for an experienced user. Thus, for beginners, the rate-of-change term is advantageously reduced or eliminated, with the yaw command being based predominantly, or solely, on the yaw input variable, such as the angle of the handlebar about the fiducial axis .
Moreover, the rate-of-change component may be filtered with respect to frequency, such that the yaw command may be tailored to be more responsive to sudden maneuvers executed by more experienced riders and more forgiving of sudden maneuvers executed by less capable riders.
In some embodiments, the experience level of the user is used to provide different operating characteristics for a transporter depending on whether the user is a beginner or an expert. In this manner, the low speed sensitivity and maximum commanded yaw rate can be reduced for a beginner mode while preserving the steady state operation of a transporter that the transporter would operate in for an expert mode.
Further, in some embodiments of the invention, different control gains are used to control operation of the transporter for a beginner mode versus an expert mode when, for example, operating the transporter in reverse and/or during mounting and dismounting of the platform of the transporter.
Several alternative modalities for specifying user directional or velocity input are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/939,955, which has been incorporated herein by reference. A preferred technique for receiving yaw command input on the basis of handlebar lean is discussed herein, and several embodiments for implementing handlebar lean are depicted in
In the handlebar lean modality, in some embodiments, the yaw input is proportional to some function of the handlebar angle with respect to the chassis, where that functional dependence may be changed on the basis of specified operational circumstances. Alternatively, the yaw input may be proportional to some function of the handlebar angle with respect to a device-independent frame, such as with respect to the local Earth/inertial frame of reference (i.e., to the local vertical−the local gravity vector).
A preferred relation of handle tilt to commanded yaw is shown in .
Preferably, the pivot axis is disposed as low as practical on the transporter ground-contacting module in order to allow the bar motion to follow the users body motion naturally, since a person leans most stably by pivoting at the ankles. In other words, a low pivot handlebar tracks the body kinematics. In this embodiment, the yaw input is converted into a yaw command using standard personal transporter algorithms, which apply a fixed gain to yaw input at low speeds, but scale the gain at higher speed to make the yaw input correspond to lateral acceleration instead of yaw rate. This works well with the handlebar lean device, since the desired lean angle is roughly proportional to lateral acceleration. The result is a very natural input method, where the user “thinks” right or left via leaning, and the machine follows.
ψ&cmd=K(ΦHB−ΦRoll)
where K is a constant;
ΦHB is the handlebar angle with respect to the platform;
ΦRoll is the platform lean with respect to gravity;
ψ&cmd is the yaw command.
Other embodiments of the invention may have an inclined or horizontally mounted pivot handlebar. In machines with inclined pivots, the angle of the pivot with respect to the contact patch of the transporter and surface provided interesting turning dynamics. Specifically, the axis of rotation may affect the dynamics of turning on a slope or on a flat surface. Preferably, the machine has a low horizontal pivot. A horizontal pivot can easily track the kinematics of the body during a turn.
In accordance with yet other embodiments of the invention, with the direction of travel as the reference point, the pivoted handlebar may be either mounted in the front or the rear of the transporter. The configuration of a rear mounted pivot handlebar enables a user to steer the transporter with other parts of the body such as the knees, in addition to using a limb coupled to the handlebar. Furthermore, the transporter may include a feature that disables the lean steer when a user is mounting or dismounting. The feature may be activated when the transporter determines that a user is partially on/off the platform such that the transporter may not turn into or away from the user while mounting or dismounting.
Of the various mechanisms suited to provide for handlebar lean, a first mechanism is described with reference to
In one embodiment of the invention, the motion of the handlebar is biased to a central position, as discussed further, below. In accordance with an embodiment depicted in
Yet a further embodiment of the invention is depicted in
Referring again to , where the pivot axis is the roll axis of the transporter 10 such that handle rotation is in a lateral plane with respect to transporter forward motion. An exploded view of a pivot assembly 500, about which handle 16 is rotated is shown in
Shaft 502 is aligned along the pivot axis (see,
with respect to base extrusion 506 and torsional bushing 512. Base 506 is coupled to platform 12.
The orientation of shaft 502, and, thus, of handle 16, is sensed by pivot angle sensor assembly 508 which contains redundant sensors 510, which may be any sensors known in the art for sensing rotation (e.g., Hall-effect sensors). Other sensors (e.g., optical sensors or magnetic sensors) may also be employed within the scope of the present invention.
Any mechanism for providing a force that opposes an increasing yaw command, and that restores the yaw input to its central position is within the scope of the invention. One preferred embodiment includes the constant-stress torsional bushing 512.
Torsional bushing 512 is shown in greater detail in axis) concentrically with respect to cowling 76. The restoring torque is symmetrical with respect to left/right rotation of the shaft 502. The length over which elastomeric membrane 74 is coupled to the shaft 72 exceeds the length over which the membrane 74 is coupled to cowling 76 in order to maintain a substantially equal shear stress per unit cross sectional area of the membrane, thereby advantageously increasing the durability and lifetime of the membrane 74. It is to be understood that membrane 74 may be uniform in thickness or tapered within the scope of the present invention.
In accordance with an alternate embodiment of the invention, the angular position of the handle 16 is measured by placing inertial sensors on, or within, the handle 16. Thus, the angle governing motion of the transporter 10 is that of the handle 16 measured directly with respect to local gravity rather than with respect to the platform 12, advantageously decoupling, to a certain extent, roll and pitch of the platform 12 and control of torque to the wheels.
One issue that must be addressed in handlebar lean control is the effect of terrain sensitivity. If the machine is driven over obstacles or rough terrain, a roll disturbance is forced on the machine/rider system since the resulting change in position of the user may cause an unintended yaw input that is input into the system. Yaw control modalities that depend upon the overall body lean of a standing person are prone to be more sensitive to terrain than, for example, yaw control by means of a twist grip.
To combat this roll sensitivity, a roll compensation algorithm may be employed. In such an algorithm, the yaw input is modified to compensate for the roll angle of the chassis, making the yaw input equal to the angle of the handlebar with respect to gravity rather than with respect to the platform, this facilitates rejection of roll disturbances.
In accordance with certain embodiments of the invention, a method for reducing terrain sensitivity employs an algorithm for filtering yaw inputs based on the roll rate of the chassis. The instantaneous rate of rolling, referred to as Roll Rate, is readily available from the Pitch State Estimator, such as that described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,332,103, incorporated herein by reference, which Pitch State Estimator derives the orientation of the transporter based on one or more gyroscopes, an inclinometer, or combinations of the above. Large roll transients cause the rider to be accelerated and, if the roll transients were to be rigidly coupled, through the rider, to the yaw control mechanism, they would cause unintended yaw input.
There are two distinct parts of the solution: rejecting terrain while riding straight and rejecting terrain while turning; the first is a special case of the second. While disabling yaw during periods of large roll rates would solve the problem for motion in a fixed direction, more input is required in order to decouple roll from steered motion.
An unknown input is an estimate of the “intended” yaw input from the user (e.g., the intention by the user to ride around in a 20′ (6.1 meter) diameter circle). While the intended yaw input information is not directly available, it can be usefully inferred from the history of the yaw input. Simply low-pass filtering the historical yaw input data provides an estimate of yaw input. However, this causes a response delay that is noticeable to the rider. On the other hand, if low-pass filtered yaw input data are used only when high roll rates are present, the rider is less likely to notice the delay. The algorithm, then, in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, employs a mixer, controlled by roll rate, between direct yaw input and a heavily filtered version of the yaw input.
A transfer function models the amount of roll rate that will couple into the yaw signal. It is a function of various factors, including the design of the yaw input, the rider's ability or experience level, and how the rider is holding on to the yaw input mechanism (e.g., the handle 16 of
Four main tuning points are: how fast the mixer slews to the filtered version of the yaw input, how fast the mixer slews back, at what threshold the mix starts and ends, and the corner frequency of the low pass filter (LPF) on the yaw input. There are limits to the amount of un-commanded yaw that can be removed due to setting the mix threshold. By setting it high there is more un-commanded yaw, by setting it low there are more false trips and the rider will begin to notice the time lag on the yaw signal. Setting the LPF frequency also has tradeoffs. If yaw is too heavily filtered, then there will be a noticeable delay and a possibility of yaw transients coupling in from the past. Setting it too low reduces the ability of the mixer to remove the transients.
Referring now to
yaw command=F*Yaw Input+(1−F)*Yaw Filtered,
where F is the mixer function, a continuously varying signal between 0.0 and 1.0. Low-pass filtering of the sensed roll rate (Filtered Roll Rate) is advantageously provided in order that travel over a rough surface will not result in erratic yaw response.
Spectral filtering of sensed roll and pitch also encompasses a more general concept of “bump detection.” Bump detection may be employed in order to account for distortion of pitch calculation due to accelerometer tilt drift. In the application of bump detection in various embodiments of the invention, when high accelerations (higher than reasonable for tilt and normal fore/aft acceleration) are detected by accelerometers (e.g., mounted on or in the transporter), they fill up a “buffer” which bleeds off over time. For example, an operating condition in which a transporter travels over many bumps over a relatively short period of time would result in the buffer filling up. When this buffer is full (e.g., reaches a pre-defined limit), the speed limit is set to a low value (˜5 mph/2.24 meters/second) to reduce the potential of pitch error. This is called a “dizzy” condition. After several seconds at the slower speed, during which a higher fidelity pitch estimate is regained, the speed limit is allowed to recover to its prior value.
Another issue that may be addressed in handlebar lean control is the effect of turning while moving backwards. The system may deal with lean turning while moving backward, by switching the direction of the yaw command, so that user lean into the direction of the turn is maintained in reverse motion. The system may further compensate for the dynamics of turning while moving backward by desensitizing the lean steering movement. Desensitizing the lean steering while reversing can advantageously facilitate using the same equations to generate the yaw command as those used in the forward direction, the resulting system having positive feedback.
Safe operation of a balancing transporter under conditions in which a fault has been detected has been described, for example, in the U.S. Pat. No. 6,538,411, to Field et al., entitled “Deceleration Control of a Personal Transporter,” and incorporated herein by reference.
In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, various stratagems are employed for detection of steering faults. In particular, steering sensors are checked for rate of change based on a specified maximum rate typical of human input to the handlebar. When a signal value provided by a sensor lies outside the specified range and, additionally, disagrees with another, redundant, sensor, it allows the system to choose the correct of two disagreeing sensors for use in a deceleration-to-zero maneuver, maintaining steering control during the course of the fail-safe maneuver. In some embodiments, the detection of a yaw-command rate change that is out of acceptable limits is an indication of a sensor fault. This may be used instead of, or in addition to, the typical “rail” limit fault detection of the sensors based on actual measured values.
An array of five lights 102 (e.g., light emitting diodes (LEDs)), is provided, preferably on a console 104 disposed in a fixed position relative to platform 12 (between transversely disposed wheels 20) so as to be readily viewable by a rider either mounted on, or mounting, the transporter. In one embodiment, when the colors displayed by the LEDs are all illuminated in a single color (e.g., green), it is indicative of the platform 12 being level and in a correct orientation for mounting. Illumination of an LED in another color (e.g., red) indicates a tilt in the direction corresponding to that LED.
The lights of the digital level may also be employed to indicate other states of the transporter. For example, a condition of blinking red lights may indicate an alarm condition such as a fault, requiring deceleration and dismounting. In some embodiments, blinking lights is representative of a condition involving unauthorized use of the transporter.
In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, separate plates 18 and 19 (shown in
The use of plates 18 and 19 may be advantageously employed to control or limit turning of the transporter during the process of mounting or dismounting the transporter, as a matter of, for example, convenience and safety. For example, sensitivity of the control used to operate the transporter (e.g., the transport 10 of
Alternative steering behavior can be specified in alternative embodiments of the invention. For example, alternative transporter speeds can specified. Further, steering behavior can be changed based on the amount of force applied by a user to one, or both, of the plates 18 and 19. In some embodiments, the experience level of the user (similarly as discussed herein) is a factor that is used to specify the steering behavior of the transporter.
In some embodiments of the present invention transporter 10 is provided with the capability of wireless control and of wireless telemetry of data via, for example, a telemetry unit. The wireless control and wireless telemetry of data can be provided unilaterally or bilaterally. In some embodiments, a remote input device is provided that may be carried by a user or may be disposed either on the transporter or at a remote location. In one embodiment, the transporter 10 includes a transceiver that establishes wireless remote communications between the input device and the controller of the transporter 10. The capability to control certain functions wirelessly advantageously enables manufacture of transporter 10 with all electronics contained entirely beneath platform 12, and, more particularly, with a control stalk 16 bearing no electronics.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, control fob 110 provides a series of user input functionalities via a plurality of user activated buttons 112. These functionalities include, without limitation:
turning the transporter on and off;
selecting a proficiency/user experience level mode, such as toggling among a beginner, intermediate, and expert mode, each imposing specified operational constraints (e.g., including speed limits or yaw control gains).
enabling an “alarm mode” in which, if any sensor is disturbed (such as one of the sensors measuring yaw, pitch, or roll motion, steering angle change, or rider detection), an alarm is triggered, resulting in sounds, machine shakes, or other manifestation of alarm. Additionally, the motor drives are activated to lock the wheels (e.g., the wheels 20 of
In some embodiments, the wireless operation capability, by virtue of data telemetry between a transporter-mounted data transceiver and a remote device, advantageously provides for the broadcasting of operational data, such as an indication of battery charge, travel speed and proper operation of the control system. These may be indicated, for example, by icons on the display face of control fob 110.
Additionally, an “enabling beacon” may be transmitted by a remote device, such as fob 110, such that operation of the transporter is enabled only within a range of distances in which the enabling beacon is received.
Moreover, coupling of a telemetry transceiver to the transporter controller allows both for wireless loading of software (initial or updated), as well as for wireless diagnostics of transporter systems and operation, advantageously simplifying both manufacturing and service business models.
Operation of a transporter in a mode in which an operator walks alongside the transporter and governs its propulsion over a surface by operation of a handlebar twist grip, for example, has been taught in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/462,379, which is incorporated herein by reference.
In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, transporter 10 may be drawn at a slow speed behind a user not mounted on the transporter. Transporter 10 is typically governed by an electronic “leash” which prevents motion of the device when a user is not mounted. In earlier transporters, operation of the leash was tethered to a fixed reference point, reset as soon as the transporter was stopped and the rider dismounted.
In accordance with a new “follow mode,” the reference point of the leash is allowed to be translated at a slow velocity, thereby allowed the machine to be towed by a user, or to climb stairs, etc. Higher velocities can be sustained only for short distances. The maximum velocity of the reference point is set to allow some utility while minimizing the energy of an unpiloted machine.
The described embodiments of the invention are intended to be merely exemplary and numerous variations and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. In particular, many of the controllers and methods of direction and speed control described herein may be applied advantageously to personal transporters that are not balancing personal transporters. Balancing transporters present particular requirements for combining yaw and balance controls, as discussed in the foregoing description and in U.S. Pat. No. 6,789,640. All such variations and modifications are intended to be within the scope of the present invention as defined in any appended claims.
The present application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/774,876, filed on Jul. 9, 2007 which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/819,165, filed Jul. 7, 2006 and is a continuation-in-part of copending application Ser. No. 10/939,955, filed on Sep. 13, 2004 which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Pat. No. 6,789,640 which issued on Sep. 14, 2004, and claiming priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/388,846, filed Jun. 14, 2002, as well as a continuation-in-part of now abandoned application Ser. No. 10/044,590, filed Jan. 11, 2002, which is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 09/635,936, filed Aug. 10, 2000, which issued Apr. 9, 2002 as U.S. Pat. No. 6,367,817, which is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 09/325,978, filed Jun. 4, 1999, which issued Oct. 16, 2001 as U.S. Pat. No. 6,302,230, from all of which applications the present application claims priority. All of the foregoing applications are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60819165 | Jul 2006 | US | |
| 60388846 | Jun 2002 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11774876 | Jul 2007 | US |
| Child | 12776618 | US | |
| Parent | 09635936 | Aug 2000 | US |
| Child | 10044590 | US | |
| Parent | 09325978 | Jun 1999 | US |
| Child | 09635936 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10044590 | Jan 2002 | US |
| Child | 10939955 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10939955 | Sep 2004 | US |
| Child | 11774876 | US | |
| Parent | 10308850 | Dec 2002 | US |
| Child | 10939955 | US |
