The present invention is related to subject matter that is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/654,858, filed on Sep. 4, 2003 and entitled “ENHANCED NETWORK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM,” and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
1. Field of the Disclosure
The present disclosure relates generally to communication nodes and methods of processing data at such nodes.
2. Description of the Related Art
Communication nodes located between wide area networks and local area data networks have been deployed commercially. An example of a communication node is a channel service unit/data service unit (CSU/DSU). CSU/DSU units that are currently available for deployment receive and forward data traffic between a wide area network and a local area network.
CSU/DSU units communicate data traffic with a wide area network according to a frame relay type protocol. A frame relay type protocol is a packet-switching protocol for connecting devices on a wide area network. CSU/DSU units are often connected directly to a wide area network via asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) equipment. Customer billing is typically based on a guaranteed minimum data throughput and/or a local loop charge.
However, certain system implementations may transfer frame relay communications to an intermediate connection or intermediate network in the communication path to the wide area network. The transfer of data traffic can include data encapsulation according to another protocol. The intermediate transmission and/or encapsulation of the data traffic is often transparent to the CSU/DSU units and the ATM equipment, that is, the CSU/DSU units and ATM equipment are not aware of the transmission and/or encapsulation of the data traffic.
CSU/DSU units can provide various management data, such as performance report data and network management information. However, where CSU/DSU units are not aware of a transparent intermediate connection or network, the CSU/DSU units are not capable of monitoring the transparent connection or network to provide management data and performance reporting. Lack of management data and network management information is problematic when implementing service level agreements (SLA's) where customers are charged based on bandwidth available and/or used on the transparent intermediate connections or networks.
Accordingly, there is a need for an enhanced communication node and method of accessing management data for transparent connections or networks.
The use of the same reference symbols in different drawings indicates similar or identical items.
An enhanced data communication node is disclosed. The data communication node can be coupled to a local area network and a wide area network for transferring data traffic between the two networks according to a first protocol, for example, a frame relay protocol. The data communication node includes a network reporting element capable of monitoring management information of an intermediate network coupled into a data communication path to the wide area network. The management information includes service level information of the intermediate network and equipment fault information of a bridging device coupled to the data communication node and the intermediate network. The bridging device encapsulates data according to a second protocol, for example, a Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) protocol. The encapsulating is transparent to the transfer of data between the local area network and the wide area network by the data communication node.
In one embodiment, a first data interface is coupled to a first network and a second data interface is coupled to a second network, wherein data traffic is transferred between the second interface and the second network via a third network. The third network is intermediate with respect to the first network and the second network and the second data interface is further coupled to a first external device. The enhanced data communication node also includes a network reporting element configured to monitor equipment fault information of the first external device and to monitor service level information of the third network.
In another embodiment, a method includes sending data packets using a first protocol to a bridging device from a first port of a channel service unit, encapsulating the data packets using the bridging device via a second protocol to generate encapsulated data, wherein the encapsulated data is later de-encapsulated for transmission to a wide area network, and monitoring equipment fault information of the bridging device via the first port of the channel service unit, wherein the encapsulating of the data packets is transparent to the sending of the data packets from the first port of the channel service unit to the wide area network.
Referring to
Wide area network 102 can be, for example, the Internet. Local area network 104 can include, for example, a router 120 and various peripheral equipment end terminals 122 and 124 coupled via an Ethernet connection 126. Alternatively, local area network can simply include a modem connected to a home user computer system.
DSL connection 114 is a high speed digital pipeline. By transferring traffic data using DSL connection 114, service costs are reduced and penetration is increased into certain markets that can be economically reached without the added expense of Frame Relay Switches in remote offices.
Customers typically own and operate both CSU/DSU 110 and bridging node 112. In one embodiment, CSU/DSU 110 and bridging node 112 are implemented as a single piece of equipment. A network provider typically owns and operates DSLAM 116 and ATM 118.
Referring to
During operation, the IP router/gateway interface 202 may receive Ethernet data from a local area network and may forward such data to control processor 208. Similarly, the frame relay interface 204 may receive data from a wide area network and forward such data to the control processor 208. Thus, the control processor 208 has access to both local area network data and to wide area network data. The control processor 208, based on various processing of the input data, produces management data and performance data including network management data. The management data may also include measurements related to the input traffic data. However, by simply processing wide area network data received via frame relay interface 204, control processor 208 cannot differentiate management data due to wide area network conditions, transparent connection/network conditions, and bridging equipment conditions.
To address this issue, network reporting element 210 is configured to monitor transparent equipment, such as by monitoring DSL connection 114 for service level information and bridging node 112 for equipment failures. Network reporting element 210 can determine outage errors on DSL connection 114 that may affect a service level agreement. The network reporting element 210 may also differentiate between equipment failure of bridging node 112 and service level or network failure of DSL connection 114. Network reporting element 210 can monitor bridging node 112 and DSL connection 114 utilizing a frame relay virtual circuit (VC) or a Data Link Connection Identifier (DLCI). A VC is a two-way connection between the CSU/DSU 110 and bridging node 112 that sends Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) traffic. SNMP is an Internet standard protocol, defined in RFC 1157, developed to manage nodes on an Internet protocol (IP) network. A DLCI is a private or switched virtual circuit in a Frame Relay network that indicates how the data is to be routed.
Network reporting element 210 can be implemented as hardware elements, for example, an integrated circuit or function incorporated into CSU/DSU 110. Alternatively, network reporting element 210 can be a software agent written according to SNMP (see, for example, RFC 1157). Alternatively, network reporting element 210 can be a software agent written according to Common Reliable Accounting for Network Element (CRANE) or some other non-proprietary protocol.
Referring to
Referring to
The above disclosed subject matter is to be considered illustrative, and not restrictive, and the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications, enhancements, and other embodiments, which fall within the true spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, to the maximum extent allowed by law, the scope of the present invention is to be determined by the broadest permissible interpretation of the following claims and their equivalents, and shall not be restricted or limited by the foregoing detailed description.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5469353 | Pinsky et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5896383 | Wakeland | Apr 1999 | A |
5970069 | Kumar et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6047002 | Hartmann et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6271845 | Richardson | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272127 | Golden et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6351452 | Koenig et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370152 | Schofield et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389464 | Krishnamurthy et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6421319 | Iwasaki | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430273 | Shaheen | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430619 | Sitaraman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445682 | Weitz | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452923 | Gerszberg et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453016 | Chea, Jr. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6477579 | Kunkel et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6498791 | Pickett et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6510152 | Gerszberg et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6526581 | Edson | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6553489 | Osler et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559769 | Anthony et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6560222 | Pounds et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6584502 | Natarajan et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594695 | Vasamsetti et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6614781 | Elliott et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631120 | Milbrandt | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6631436 | Liu et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636505 | Wang et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6704303 | Bowman-Amuah | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6904054 | Baum et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6947416 | Nee et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6963561 | Lahat | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6970924 | Chu et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7065077 | Radhakrishnan et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7099305 | Fardid | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7184427 | Carew et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7194001 | Leatherbury et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203187 | Richardson et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7274684 | Young et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
20020024964 | Baum et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020159462 | Demaria et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030039244 | Owens et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043785 | Liu et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030076815 | Miller et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030108063 | Joseph et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030193959 | Lui et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040076166 | Patenaude | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040111506 | Kundu et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040218584 | Brown | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050055431 | Jones et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050089052 | Chen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050226247 | Brown | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060098670 | Voit et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070097884 | Chewning, III et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050053001 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |