Enhanced data cable with cross-twist cabled core profile

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8729394
  • Patent Number
    8,729,394
  • Date Filed
    Monday, May 5, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 20, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
A cable exhibiting reduced crosstalk between transmission media includes a core having a profile with a shape which defines spaces or channels to maintain a spacing between transmission media in a finished cable. The core is formed of a conductive material to further reduce crosstalk. A method of producing a cable introduces a core as described above into the cable assembly and imparts a cable closing twist to the assembly.
Description
BACKGROUND

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates to high-speed data communications cables using at least two twisted pairs of wires. More particularly, it relates to cables having a central core defining plural individual pair channels.


2. Related Art


High-speed data communications media in current usage include pairs of wire twisted together to form a balanced transmission line. Such pairs of wire are referred to as twisted pairs. One common type of conventional cable for high-speed data communications includes multiple twisted pairs. When twisted pairs are closely placed, such as in a cable, electrical energy may be transferred from one pair of a cable to another. Such energy transferred between pairs is undesirable and referred to as crosstalk. The Telecommunications Industry Association and Electronics Industry Association have defined standards for crosstalk, including TIA/EIA-568A. The International Electrotechnical Commission has also defined standards for data communication cable crosstalk, including ISO/IEC 11801. One high-performance standard for 1000 cable is ISO/IEC 11801, Category 5.


In conventional cable, each twisted pair of a cable has a specified distance between twists along the longitudinal direction, that distance being referred to as the pair lay. When adjacent twisted pairs have the same pair lay and/or twist direction, they tend to lie within a cable more closely spaced than when they have different pair lays and/or twist direction. Such close spacing increases the amount of undesirable crosstalk which occurs. Therefore, in some conventional cables, each twisted pair within the cable has a unique pair lay in order to increase the spacing between pairs and thereby to reduce the crosstalk between twisted pairs of a cable. Twist direction may also be varied. Along with varying pair lays and twist directions, individual solid metal or woven metal pair shields are sometimes used to electromagnetically isolate pairs.


Shielded cable, although exhibiting better crosstalk isolation, is more difficult and time consuming to install and terminate. Shield conductors are generally terminated using special tools, devices and techniques adapted for the job.


One popular cable type meeting the above specifications is Unshielded Twisted Pair (UTP) cable. Because it does not include shield conductors, UTP is preferred by installers and plant managers, as it is easily installed and terminated. However, UTP fails to achieve superior crosstalk isolation, as required by state of the art transmission systems, even when varying pair lays are used.


Another solution to the problem of twisted pairs lying too closely together within a cable is embodied in a cable manufactured by Belden Wire & Cable Company as product number 1711A. This cable includes four twisted pair media radially disposed about a “+”-shaped core. Each twisted pair nests between two fins of the “+”-shaped core, being separated from adjacent twisted pairs by the core. This helps reduce and stabilize crosstalk between the twisted pair media. However, the core adds substantial cost to the cable, as well as material which forms a potential fire hazard, as explained below, while achieving a crosstalk reduction of only about 5 dB.


In building design, many precautions are taken to resist the spread of flame and the generation of and spread of smoke throughout a building in case of an outbreak of fire. Clearly, it is desired to protect against loss of life and also to minimize the costs of a fire due to the destruction of electrical and other equipment. Therefore, wires and cables for in building installations are required to comply with the various flammability requirements of the National Electrical Code (NEC) and/or the Canadian Electrical Code (CEC).


Cables intended for installation in the air handling spaces (ie. plenums, ducts, etc.) of buildings are specifically required by NEC or CEC to pass the flame test specified by Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL), UL-910, or it's Canadian Standards Association (CSA) equivalent, the FT6. The UL-910 and the FT6 represent the top of the fire rating hierarchy established by the NEC and CEC respectively. Cables possessing this rating, generically known as “plenum” or “plenum rated”, may be substituted for cables having a lower rating (ie. CMR, CM, CMX, FT4, FT1 or their equivalents), while lower rated cables may not be used where plenum rated cable is required.


Cables conforming to NEC or CEC requirements are characterized as possessing superior resistance to ignitability, greater resistant to contribute to flame spread and generate lower levels of smoke during fires than cables having a lower fire rating. Conventional designs of data grade telecommunications cables for installation in plenum chambers have a low smoke generating jacket material, e.g. of a PVC formulation or a fluoropolymer material, surrounding a core of twisted conductor pairs, each conductor individually insulated with a fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) insulation layer. Cable produced as described above satisfies recognized plenum test requirements such as the “peak smoke” and “average smoke” requirements of the Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., UL910 Steiner test and/or Canadian Standards Association CSA-FT6 (Plenum Flame Test) while also achieving desired electrical performance in accordance with EIA/TIA-568A for high frequency signal transmission.


While the above-described conventional cable including the Belden 1711A cable due in part to their use of FEP meets all of the above design criteria, the use of fluorinated ethylene propylene is extremely expensive and may account for up to 60% of the cost of a cable designed for plenum usage.


The solid core of the Belden 1711A cable contributes a large volume of fuel to a cable fire. Forming the core of a fire resistant material, such as FEP, is very costly due to the volume of material used in the core.


Solid flame retardant/smoke suppressed polyolefin may also be used in connection with FEP. Solid flame retardant/smoke suppressed polyolefin compounds commercially available all possess dielectric properties inferior to that of FEP. In addition, they also exhibit inferior resistance to burning and generally produce more smoke than FEP under burning conditions than FEP.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention provides an improved data cable.


According to one embodiment, the cable includes a plurality of transmission media; a core having a surface defining recesses within which each of the plurality of transmission media are individually disposed; and an outer jacket maintaining the plurality of data transmission media in position with respect to the core.


According to another embodiment of the invention, a cable includes a plurality of transmission media radially disposed about a core having a surface with features which maintain a separation between each of the plurality of transmission media.


Finally, according to yet another embodiment of the invention, there is a method of producing a cable. The method first passes a plurality of transmission media and a core through a first die which aligns the plurality of transmission media with surface features of the core and prevents twisting motion of the core. Next, the method bunches the aligned plurality of transmission media and core using a second die which forces each of the plurality of transmission media into contact with the surface features of the core which maintain a spatial relationship between each of the plurality of transmission media. Finally, the bunched plurality of transmission media and core are twisted to close the cable, and the closed cable is jacketed.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the drawings, in which like reference numerals designate like elements:



FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a cable core used in embodiments of the invention;



FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of a cable including the core of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of another embodiment of a cable including the core of FIG. 1;



FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a die system for practicing a method of making a cable in accordance with another embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of a cable; and



FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of a cable.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

An embodiment of the invention is now described in which a cable is constructed to include four twisted pairs of wire and a core having a unique profile. However, the invention is not limited to the number of pairs or the profile used in this embodiment. The inventive principles can be applied to cables including greater or fewer numbers of twisted pairs and different core profiles. Also, although this embodiment of the invention is described and illustrated in connection with twisted pair data communication media, other high-speed data communication media can be used in constructions of cable according to the invention.


This illustrative embodiment of the invention, as shown in FIG. 1, includes an extruded core 101 having a profile described below cabled into the cable with four twisted pairs 103. The extruded core profile has an initial shape of a “+”, providing four spaces or channels 105 between each pair of fins of the core. Each channel 105 carries one twisted pair 103 placed within the channel 105 during the cabling operation. The illustrated core 101 and profile should not be considered limiting. The core 101 may be made by some other process than extrusion and may have a different initial shape or number of channels 105. For example, there may be an optional central channel 107 provided to carry a fiber optic element.


The above-described embodiment can be constructed using a number of different materials. While the invention is not limited to the materials now given, the invention is advantageously practiced using these materials. The core material should be a conductive material or one containing a powdered ferrite, the core material being generally compatible with use in data communications cable applications, including any applicable fire safety standards. In non-plenum applications, the core can be formed of solid or foamed flame retardant polyolefin or similar materials. In plenum applications, the core can be any one or more of the following compounds: a solid low dielectric constant fluoropolymer, e.g., ethylene chlortrifluoroethylene (E-CTFE) or fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), a foamed fluoropolymer, e.g., foamed FEP, and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) in either solid, low dielectric constant form or foamed. A filler is added to the compound to render the extruded product conductive. Suitable fillers are those compatible with the compound into which they are mixed, including but not limited to powdered ferrite, semiconductive thermoplastic elastomers and carbon black. Conductivity of the core helps to further isolate the twisted pairs from each other.


A conventional four-pair cable including a non-conductive core, such as the Belden 1711A cable, reduces nominal crosstalk by up to 5 dB over similar, four-pair cable without the core. By making the core conductive, crosstalk is reduced a further 5 dB. Since both loading and jacket construction can affect crosstalk, these figures compare cables with similar loading and jacket construction.


The cable may be finished in any one of several conventional ways, as shown in FIG. 2. The combined core 101 and twisted pairs 103 may be optionally wrapped with a dielectric tape 201, then jacketed 205 to form cable 200. An overall conductive shield 205 can optionally be applied over the cable before jacketing to prevent the cable from causing or receiving electromagnetic interference. The jacket 203 may be PVC or another material as discussed above in relation to the core 101. The dielectric tape 201 may be polyester, or another compound generally compatible with data communications cable applications, including any applicable fire safety standards.


Greater crosstalk isolation is achieved in the construction of FIG. 3, by using a conductive shield 301, for example a metal braid, a solid metal foil shield or a conductive plastic layer in contact with the ends of the fins 303 of the core 101. Such a construction rivals individual shielding of twisted pairs for crosstalk isolation. This construction optionally can advantageously include a drain wire in a central channel 107. In the constructions of both FIGS. 2 and 3 it is advantageous to have the fins 303 of the core 101 extend somewhat beyond a boundary defined by the outer dimension of the twisted pairs 103. In the construction of FIG. 2 this ensures that he twisted pairs 103 do not escape their respective channels 105 prior to the cable being jacketed, while in that of FIG. 3 and good contact between the fins 303 and the shield 301 is ensured. In both constructions, closing and jacketing the cable may bend the tips of the fins 303 over slightly, as shown in the core material is relatively soft, such as PVC.


A method of making cable in accordance with the above-described embodiments is now described.


As is known in this art, when plural elements are cabled together, an overall twist is imparted to the assembly to improve geometric stability and help prevent separation. In embodiments of the present invention, twisting of the profile of the core along with the individual twisted pairs is controlled. The process allows the extruded core to maintain a physical spacing between the twisted pairs and maintains geometrical stability within the cable. Thus, the process assists in the achievement of and maintenance of high crosstalk isolation by placing a conductive core in the cable to maintain pair spacing.


Cables of the previously described embodiments, can be made by a three-part die system. However, methods of making such cables are not limited to a three-part die system, as more or fewer die elements can be constructed to incorporate the features of the invention.


The extruded core is drawn from a payoff reel (not shown) through the central opening 401 in die 403. Four twisted pairs are initially aligned with the core by passing through openings 405 in die 403. The core is next brought through opening 407 and brought together with the four twisted pairs which are passed through openings 409 in a second die 411, then cabled with the twisted pairs which are pushed into the channels of the core by a third die 413, in an operation called bunching. The second die 411 eliminates back twist, which is inherent in bunching operations, thus allowing the third die 413 to place the pairs in the channels prior to the twisting. The cable twist is imparted to the cable assembly after the second die 411, which locates the twisted pairs relative to the extruded core profile.


Although the method of making cable has been described in connection with an extruded core delivered into the process from a payoff reel, the invention is not so limited. For example, the core could be extruded immediately prior to use and transferred directly from the extruder to the central opening 401 of the first die 403. In another variation, the core could be extruded directly through a properly shaped central opening of either the first die 403 or the second die 411.


The present invention has now been described in connection with a number of specific embodiments thereof. However, numerous modifications which are contemplated as falling within the scope of the present invention should now be apparent to those skilled in the art. Therefore, it is intended that the scope of the present invention be limited only by the scope of the claims appended hereto.

Claims
  • 1. An unshielded high speed data communications cable comprising: a plurality of twisted pairs of conductors;a non-conductive central core including a plurality of fins having substantially parallel sides extending radially outward from a central region of the non-conductive central core,
  • 2. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 1, wherein said at least one fin is bent at a tip by the outer jacket.
  • 3. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 1, further comprising a binder wrapped around the plurality of twisted pairs and non-conductive central core, the binder together with the outer jacket maintaining the plurality of twisted pairs of conductors within the plurality of channels.
  • 4. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 3, wherein said at least one fin is bent at a tip by the outer jacket and/or the binder.
  • 5. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 3, wherein the binder comprises a dielectric tape.
  • 6. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 5, wherein the dielectric tape is a polyester tape.
  • 7. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 1, wherein the plurality of fins consists of four fins and the plurality of channels consists of four channels that are defined by adjacent pairs of the four fins.
  • 8. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 7, wherein each of the four fins extends radially outward from the central region of the non-conductive core at substantially right angles to at least one other of the four fins.
  • 9. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 1, wherein the plurality of fins position the plurality of twisted pairs in a substantially 90° relationship.
  • 10. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 1, wherein each fin of the plurality of fins has a rounded tip.
  • 11. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 1, wherein the cable is configured to be Underwriters Laboratories (UL) compliant, and wherein the non-conductive central core comprises at least one of a solid fluoropolymer, and a foamed fluoropolymer.
  • 12. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 11, wherein the outer jacket is formed of polyvinyl chloride.
  • 13. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 1, wherein the non-conductive central core is formed of a solid or foamed flame retardant polyolefin.
  • 14. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 1, wherein the non-conductive central core comprises a central cavity.
  • 15. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 14, further comprising a fiber optic element disposed within the central cavity.
  • 16. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 1, wherein each twisted pair of conductors comprises a metal conductor insulated with fluoroethylene-propylene (FEP).
  • 17. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 1, wherein the at least one fin of the plurality of fins extends beyond the outer boundary defined by the outer dimension of at least one of the twisted pairs of conductors to contact the outer jacket.
  • 18. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 17, wherein the at least one fin of the plurality of fins is bent at a tip by the outer jacket.
  • 19. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 1, wherein the plurality of fins comprises four fins, further comprising: each of the four fins configured to extend beyond the outer boundary defined by the outer dimension of at least one of the twisted pairs of conductors to contact the outer jacket.
  • 20. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 19, wherein the at each of the four fins is bent at a tip by the outer jacket.
  • 21. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 1, wherein the non-conductive central core is twisted.
  • 22. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 1, wherein the plurality of fins are twisted.
  • 23. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 1, wherein the plurality of twisted pairs of conductors are twisted.
  • 24. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 1, wherein the plurality of twisted pairs, the non-conductive central core, and the plurality of fins are twisted along a longitudinal axis of the unshielded high speed data communications cable to form a closed cable.
  • 25. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 1, further comprising: transmission media that includes at least one of the plurality of twisted pairs, the non-conductive central core, and the plurality of fins, wherein at least a portion of the transmission media are twisted along a longitudinal axis of the unshielded high speed data communications cable.
  • 26. An unshielded high speed data communications cable comprising: a plurality of twisted pairs of conductors;a non-conductive central core including a plurality of fins extending radially outward from a center of the core, at least one fin extending to at least an outer boundary defined by an outer dimension of the twisted pairs of conductors, the plurality of fins defining a plurality of channels within which the plurality of twisted pairs of conductors are individually disposed, the non-conductive central core being formed of a low dielectric constant flame retardant polyolefin;an outer jacket covering the plurality of twisted pairs of conductors and the non-conductive central core and arranged to maintain the plurality of twisted pairs of conductors in position with respect to the non-conductive central core, the outer jacket being formed of a nonconductive material;wherein the at least one fin of the non-conductive central core is bent at a tip by the outer jacket; and wherein the unshielded data cable does not include a shield that encloses any of the plurality of twisted pairs of conductors and the non-conductive central core.
  • 27. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 26, wherein the plurality of fins consists of four fins, each fin extending radially outward from the center of the core at substantially right angles to at least one other of the four fins.
  • 28. The unshielded high speed data communications cable of claim 26, wherein the outer jacket consists of single layer of the non-conductive material.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/532,837, filed Mar. 21, 2000 entitled Enhanced Data Cable with Cross-Twist Cabled Core Profile and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,596,944, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/841,440, filed Apr. 22, 1997 entitled Making Enhanced Data Cable with Cross-Twist Cabled Core Profile (as amended), and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,074,503.

US Referenced Citations (310)
Number Name Date Kind
483285 Guilleaume Sep 1892 A
514925 Guilleaume Feb 1894 A
524452 Ebel et al. Aug 1894 A
867659 Hoopes et al. Oct 1907 A
1008370 Robillot Nov 1911 A
1132452 Davis Mar 1915 A
1389143 Kempton Aug 1921 A
1700606 Beaver Jan 1929 A
1940917 Okazaki Dec 1933 A
1977209 Sargent Oct 1934 A
1995201 Delon Mar 1935 A
2041842 Layton May 1936 A
2149772 Hunter et al. Mar 1939 A
2204737 Swallow et al. Jun 1940 A
2218830 Rose et al. Oct 1940 A
2344501 Bennett Mar 1944 A
2538019 Lee Jan 1947 A
2501457 Thelin Mar 1950 A
2583025 Swift et al. Jan 1952 A
2583026 Swift et al. Jan 1952 A
2792442 Parce May 1957 A
2804494 Fenton Aug 1957 A
2882676 Bryan et al. Apr 1959 A
3032604 Timmons May 1962 A
3055967 Bondon Sep 1962 A
3209064 Cutler Sep 1965 A
3259687 Oatess et al. Jul 1966 A
3328510 White Jun 1967 A
3340112 Davis et al. Sep 1967 A
3350647 Gabriel et al. Oct 1967 A
3363047 Grove Jan 1968 A
3364305 Hanlon et al. Jan 1968 A
3489844 Motley Jan 1970 A
3559390 Staschewski et al. Feb 1971 A
3588313 Delves-Broughton Jun 1971 A
3603715 Eilhardt et al. Sep 1971 A
3610814 Peacock Oct 1971 A
3621118 Bunish et al. Nov 1971 A
3644659 Campbell Feb 1972 A
3649744 Coleman Mar 1972 A
3715877 Akachi Feb 1973 A
3775548 Zinser et al. Nov 1973 A
3819443 Simons et al. Jun 1974 A
3823255 La Gase et al. Jul 1974 A
3881052 Britz et al. Apr 1975 A
3888710 Burk Jun 1975 A
3911200 Simons et al. Oct 1975 A
3921378 Spicer et al. Nov 1975 A
3927247 Timmons Dec 1975 A
3945974 Schwarcz et al. Mar 1976 A
3999003 Chevrolet et al. Dec 1976 A
4034148 Lang Jul 1977 A
4038489 Stenson et al. Jul 1977 A
4205899 King et al. Jun 1980 A
4257675 Nakagome et al. Mar 1981 A
4319940 Arroyo et al. Mar 1982 A
4327246 Kincaid Apr 1982 A
4361381 Williams Nov 1982 A
4374888 Bornslaeger Feb 1983 A
4385485 Yonechi May 1983 A
4393582 Arnold, Jr. et al. Jul 1983 A
4401366 Hope Aug 1983 A
4401845 Odhner et al. Aug 1983 A
4406914 Kincaid Sep 1983 A
4412094 Dougherty et al. Oct 1983 A
4428787 Pan et al. Jan 1984 A
4446689 Hardin et al. May 1984 A
4447122 Sutehall May 1984 A
4453031 Justiss Jun 1984 A
4456331 Whitehead et al. Jun 1984 A
4474426 Yataki Oct 1984 A
4487992 Tomita Dec 1984 A
4500748 Klein Feb 1985 A
4510346 Bursh, Jr. et al. Apr 1985 A
4510348 Arroyo et al. Apr 1985 A
4549041 Shingo et al. Oct 1985 A
4568401 Davis Feb 1986 A
4595793 Arroyo et al. Jun 1986 A
4600268 Spicer Jul 1986 A
RE32225 Neuroth Aug 1986 E
4605818 Arroyo et al. Aug 1986 A
4644098 Norris et al. Feb 1987 A
4645628 Gill Feb 1987 A
4654476 Barnicol-Ottler et al. Mar 1987 A
4661406 Gruhn et al. Apr 1987 A
4683349 Takebe Jul 1987 A
4697051 Beggs et al. Sep 1987 A
4710594 Walling et al. Dec 1987 A
4712368 Garner Dec 1987 A
4719319 Tighe, Jr. Jan 1988 A
4729409 Paul Mar 1988 A
4755629 Beggs et al. Jul 1988 A
4767891 Biegon et al. Aug 1988 A
4777325 Siwinski Oct 1988 A
4778246 Carroll Oct 1988 A
4784461 Abe et al. Nov 1988 A
4784462 Priaroggia Nov 1988 A
4788088 Kohl Nov 1988 A
4800236 Lemke Jan 1989 A
4804702 Bartoszek Feb 1989 A
4807962 Arroyo et al. Feb 1989 A
4828352 Kraft May 1989 A
4873393 Friesen et al. Oct 1989 A
4892442 Shoffner Jan 1990 A
4912283 O'Connor Mar 1990 A
4935467 Cheng Jun 1990 A
4941729 Hardin et al. Jul 1990 A
4963609 Anderson et al. Oct 1990 A
4987394 Harman et al. Jan 1991 A
5000539 Gareis Mar 1991 A
5010210 Sidi Apr 1991 A
5015800 Vaupotic et al. May 1991 A
5037999 VanDeusen Aug 1991 A
5043530 Davies Aug 1991 A
5068497 Krieger Nov 1991 A
5073682 Walling et al. Dec 1991 A
5077449 Cornibert et al. Dec 1991 A
5087110 Inagaki et al. Feb 1992 A
5097099 Miller Mar 1992 A
5107076 Bullock et al. Apr 1992 A
5132488 Tessier et al. Jul 1992 A
5132490 Aldissi Jul 1992 A
5132491 Mulrooney et al. Jul 1992 A
5132788 Hirota Jul 1992 A
5142100 Faupotic Aug 1992 A
5149915 Brunker et al. Sep 1992 A
5155304 Gossett et al. Oct 1992 A
5155789 Le Noane et al. Oct 1992 A
5162609 Adriaenssens et al. Nov 1992 A
5170010 Aldissi Dec 1992 A
5177809 Zeidler Jan 1993 A
5180884 Aldissi Jan 1993 A
5180890 Pendergrass Jan 1993 A
5202946 Hardin et al. Apr 1993 A
5212350 Gebs May 1993 A
5216202 Yoshida et al. Jun 1993 A
5220130 Walters Jun 1993 A
5222177 Chau et al. Jun 1993 A
5227417 Kroushl Jul 1993 A
5238328 Adams et al. Aug 1993 A
5245134 Vana, Jr. et al. Sep 1993 A
5283390 Hubis Feb 1994 A
5289556 Rawlyk et al. Feb 1994 A
5298680 Kenny Mar 1994 A
5304739 Klug et al. Apr 1994 A
5305797 Roy, Sr. Apr 1994 A
5313020 Sackett May 1994 A
5329064 Tash et al. Jul 1994 A
5355427 Gareis et al. Oct 1994 A
5399813 McNeill Mar 1995 A
5418878 Sass et al. May 1995 A
5424491 Walling et al. Jun 1995 A
5434354 Baker et al. Jul 1995 A
5444184 Hassel Aug 1995 A
5486649 Gareis Jan 1996 A
5493071 Newmoyer Feb 1996 A
5514837 Kenny et al. May 1996 A
5541361 Friesen et al. Jul 1996 A
5544270 Clark et al. Aug 1996 A
5557698 Gareis et al. Sep 1996 A
5563377 Arpin et al. Oct 1996 A
5574250 Hardie et al. Nov 1996 A
5576515 Bleich et al. Nov 1996 A
5600097 Bleich et al. Feb 1997 A
5606151 Siekierka et al. Feb 1997 A
5619016 Newmoyer Apr 1997 A
5658406 Walling et al. Aug 1997 A
5659152 Horie et al. Aug 1997 A
5666452 Deitz, Sr. et al. Sep 1997 A
5670748 Gingue Sep 1997 A
5696295 Wulff et al. Dec 1997 A
5698323 Keough et al. Dec 1997 A
5699467 Kojima et al. Dec 1997 A
5763823 Siekierka et al. Jun 1998 A
5767411 Maron Jun 1998 A
5789711 Gaeris et al. Aug 1998 A
5796046 Newmoyer et al. Aug 1998 A
5821466 Clark et al. Oct 1998 A
5821467 O'Brien et al. Oct 1998 A
5834697 Baker et al. Nov 1998 A
5841072 Gagnon et al. Nov 1998 A
5883334 Newmoyer et al. Mar 1999 A
5900588 Springer et al. May 1999 A
5920672 White Jul 1999 A
5936205 Newmoyer et al. Aug 1999 A
5952607 Friesen et al. Sep 1999 A
5952615 Prudhon Sep 1999 A
5956445 Deitz, Sr. et al. Sep 1999 A
5969295 Boucino et al. Oct 1999 A
5990419 Bogese, II Nov 1999 A
6037546 Mottine et al. Mar 2000 A
6074503 Clark et al. Jun 2000 A
6091025 Cotter et al. Jul 2000 A
6099345 Milner et al. Aug 2000 A
6140587 Sackett Oct 2000 A
6150612 Grandy et al. Nov 2000 A
6153826 Kenny et al. Nov 2000 A
6162992 Clark et al. Dec 2000 A
6169251 Grant et al. Jan 2001 B1
6194663 Friesen et al. Feb 2001 B1
6211467 Berelsman et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222129 Siekierka et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222130 Gareis et al. Apr 2001 B1
6248954 Clark et al. Jun 2001 B1
6255593 Reede Jul 2001 B1
6272858 Takano et al. Aug 2001 B1
6288340 Arnould Sep 2001 B1
6297454 Gareis Oct 2001 B1
6300573 Horie et al. Oct 2001 B1
6303867 Clark et al. Oct 2001 B1
6310295 Despard Oct 2001 B1
6318062 Doherty Nov 2001 B1
6355876 Morimoto Mar 2002 B1
6365836 Blouin et al. Apr 2002 B1
6378283 Barton Apr 2002 B1
6392152 Mottine, Jr. et al. May 2002 B1
6403887 Kebabjian et al. Jun 2002 B1
6441308 Gagnon Aug 2002 B1
6452094 Donner et al. Sep 2002 B2
6462268 Hazy et al. Oct 2002 B1
6506976 Neveux, Jr. Jan 2003 B1
6566607 Walling May 2003 B1
6570095 Clark et al. May 2003 B2
6596944 Clark et al. Jul 2003 B1
6624359 Bahlmann et al. Sep 2003 B2
6639152 Glew et al. Oct 2003 B2
6686537 Gareis et al. Feb 2004 B1
6687437 Starnes et al. Feb 2004 B1
6770819 Patel Aug 2004 B2
6787697 Stipes et al. Sep 2004 B2
6800811 Boucino Oct 2004 B1
6812408 Clark et al. Nov 2004 B2
6815611 Gareis Nov 2004 B1
6818832 Hopkinson et al. Nov 2004 B2
6855889 Gareis Feb 2005 B2
6858804 Murakami et al. Feb 2005 B2
6888070 Prescott May 2005 B1
6897382 Hager et al. May 2005 B2
6974913 Bahlmann et al. Dec 2005 B2
6998537 Clark et al. Feb 2006 B2
7015397 Clark Mar 2006 B2
7030321 Clark Apr 2006 B2
7049523 Shuman et al. May 2006 B2
7053310 Clark May 2006 B2
7064277 Lique et al. Jun 2006 B1
7098405 Glew Aug 2006 B2
7109424 Nordin et al. Sep 2006 B2
7115815 Kenny et al. Oct 2006 B2
7135641 Clark Nov 2006 B2
7145080 Boisvert et al. Dec 2006 B1
7154043 Clark Dec 2006 B2
7157644 Lique et al. Jan 2007 B2
7173189 Hazy et al. Feb 2007 B1
7179999 Clark Feb 2007 B2
7196271 Cornibert et al. Mar 2007 B2
7208683 Clark Apr 2007 B2
7214880 Wiekhorst et al. May 2007 B2
7214884 Kenny et al. May 2007 B2
7220918 Kenny et al. May 2007 B2
7238885 Lique et al. Jul 2007 B2
7238886 Wiekhorst et al. Jul 2007 B2
7244893 Clark Jul 2007 B2
7256351 Dillon et al. Aug 2007 B2
7262366 Clark Aug 2007 B2
7271342 Stutzman et al. Sep 2007 B2
7271343 Clark Sep 2007 B2
7276664 Gagnon Oct 2007 B2
7289332 Clark Oct 2007 B2
7317163 Lique et al. Jan 2008 B2
7329815 Kenny et al. Feb 2008 B2
7339116 Gareis et al. Mar 2008 B2
7358436 Dellagala et al. Apr 2008 B2
7390971 Jean et al. Jun 2008 B2
7405360 Clark et al. Jul 2008 B2
7449638 Clark et al. Nov 2008 B2
7462782 Clark Dec 2008 B2
7491888 Clark Feb 2009 B2
7507910 Park et al. Mar 2009 B2
7534964 Clark et al. May 2009 B2
7622680 Bricker et al. Nov 2009 B2
7663061 Gareis et al. Feb 2010 B2
7977575 Gareis et al. Jul 2011 B2
20010013418 Donner et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020050394 Clark et al. May 2002 A1
20030106704 Isley et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030230427 Gareis Dec 2003 A1
20040050578 Hudson Mar 2004 A1
20040055777 Wiekhorst et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040055779 Wiekhorst et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040055781 Cornibert et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040118593 Augustine et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040216913 Wiekhorst et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040256139 Clark Dec 2004 A1
20050006132 Clark Jan 2005 A1
20050051355 Bricker et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050092515 Kenny et al. May 2005 A1
20050133246 Parke et al. Jun 2005 A1
20060032660 Parke et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060131054 Lique et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060131055 Lique et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060131057 Lique et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060131058 Lique et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060243477 Jean et al. Nov 2006 A1
20070044994 Park et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070044996 Clark Mar 2007 A1
20070209823 Vexler et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080041609 Gareis et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080164049 Vexler et al. Jul 2008 A1
20090133895 Allen May 2009 A1
20090173514 Gareis Jul 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (49)
Number Date Country
1164064 Mar 1984 CA
2058046 Aug 1992 CA
2071417 Dec 1993 CA
697378 Oct 1940 DE
2459844 Jul 1976 DE
9011484 Nov 1990 DE
4336230 Mar 1995 DE
0961296 Dec 1999 EP
1087410 Mar 2000 EP
1059343 Dec 2000 EP
1085530 Mar 2001 EP
1107262 Jun 2001 EP
1117103 Jul 2001 EP
1130604 Sep 2001 EP
1162632 Dec 2001 EP
1215688 Jun 2002 EP
1548754 Jun 2005 EP
694100 Nov 1930 FR
1265877 May 1961 FR
2706068 Dec 1994 FR
342606 Feb 1931 GB
725624 Mar 1955 GB
2260216 Apr 1993 GB
1942-10582 Sep 1942 JP
S29-15973 Dec 1955 JP
43-1986-15470 Jun 1968 JP
S5197633331 Aug 1976 JP
52-1977-76694 Jun 1977 JP
5619817307 Jan 1981 JP
5619818011 Jan 1981 JP
61-1986-13507 Jan 1986 JP
4332406 Nov 1992 JP
5-101711 Apr 1993 JP
8-1996-96635 Apr 1996 JP
11-053958 Feb 1999 JP
1343447 Oct 1987 SU
WO 9624143 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9848430 Oct 1998 WO
WO 0051142 Aug 2000 WO
WO 0079545 Dec 2000 WO
WO 0108167 Feb 2001 WO
WO 0129828 Apr 2001 WO
WO 0129848 Apr 2001 WO
WO0154142 Jul 2001 WO
WO0193281 Dec 2001 WO
WO03077265 Sep 2003 WO
WO03094178 Nov 2003 WO
WO2005041219 May 2005 WO
WO2005048274 May 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (58)
Entry
Bell Communications Research, “Generic Requirements for Optical Fiber and Optical Fiber Cable”, Aug. 5, 1986.
Hitachi Cable Manchester, Customer Specification.
Refi, “Fiber Optic Cable: A Lightguide,” 1991.
Hawley, “Condensed Chemical Dictionary” 1981, pp. 471, 840, 841.
Images of Belden 1711A Datatwist 300 4PR23 shielded cable, Sep. 11, 1995.
Comprehensive Dictionary of Electrical Engineering 188 2nd ed., Phillip A. Laplante, Editor in Chief, 2005, 3 pages.
Diminico, Chris, “Lower cost copper solutions may drive 1-Gigabit Ethernet”, Aug. 1, 2003, http://www.cablinginstall.com/articles/print/volume-11/issue-8/contents/installation/lower-cost-copper-solutions-may-drive-10-gigabit-ethernet.html, 6 pages.
Electronics Engineers' Handbook 1.3.1., Donald Christiansen, Editor in Chief, Fourth Edition, 1997, 1 page.
Hayes, Trent M., presentation entitled, “Evaluation of Alien Crosstalk in Cat 5e and Cat 6 Installations”, IEEE 802.3 10GBASE-T Study Group, Mar. 2003, 26 pages.
Hitachi Cable Manchester, Inc., Product Specification Sheet, for “Category 5 Hi-NET Supra, Consisting of 4 Pairs, 24 AWG, Unshielded with an Overall Jacket, CMP, MPP, C(UL), Type FT6”, web-page publication, Apr. 23, 1977, pp. 1-7.
International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US2006/047113, Apr. 3, 2007, 2 pages.
File History of U.S. Patent No. 5,424,491, filed Oct. 8, 1993, Date of Patent: Jun. 13, 1995.
File History of U.S. Patent No. 6,570,095, filed May 11, 2011, Date of Patent: May 27, 2003.
File History of U.S. Patent No. 6,074,703, filed Apr. 22, 1999, Date of Patent: Jun. 13, 2000.
File History of U.S. Patent No. 6,998,537, filed Jan. 3, 2003, Date of Patent: Feb. 14, 2006.
File History of U.S. Patent No. 6,596,944, filed Mar. 21, 2000, Date of Patent: Jul. 22, 2003.
File History of U.S. Patent No. 7,339,116, filed Jan. 18, 2001, Date of Patent: Mar. 4, 2008.
File History of U.S. Patent No. 7,199,999, filed Oct. 11, 2005, Date of Patent: Apr. 3, 2007.
Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, Nov. 28, 2009, 1 page.
Declaration of Anne Shea Gaza, Redacted Public Version from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Jan. 20, 2010, pp. 1-55.
Responsive Claims Construction Brief of Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc. and Belden CDT (Canada) Inc., Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Jan. 20, 2010, pp. 1-49.
Superior Essex Inc.'s and Superior Essex Communications LP's Answering Brief in Opposition to Belden's Motion from Summary Judgment of No. Patent Invalidity by Anticipation, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-Slr, Feb. 3, 2010, pp. 1-51.
Answer to Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc. and Belden CDT (Canada) Inc.'s Answer to Defendants Superior Essex Inc. and Superior Essex Communications LP's Counterclaims; by Belden Technologies, Inc., Belden CDT (Canada) Inc. (Poff, Adam) (Entered: May 11, 2009).
Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc. and Belden CDT (Canada), Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. 1: Patent Infringement, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Feb. 17, 2010, pp. 1-22.
Superior Essex Inc.'s and Superior Essex Communications LP's Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Feb. 17, 2010, pp. 1-24.
Superior Essex Inc.'s and Superior Essex Communications LP's Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the Patents-In-Suit, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Feb. 17, 2010, pp. 1-25.
Declaration of Anne Shea Gaza, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Feb. 17, 2010, pp. 1-89.
Superior Essex Inc.'s and Superior Essex Communications LP's Answering Brief in Opposition to Belden's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Patent Infringement, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Jan. 20, 2010, pp. 1-32.
Superior Essex Inc.'s and Superior Essex Communications LP's Memorandum in Opposition to Belden's Proposed Claim Constructions, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Jan. 20, 2010, pp. 1-48.
Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc. and Belden CDT (Canada), Inc.'s Answering Brief in Opposition to Superior Essex Inc. and Superior Essex Communications LP's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SR, Jan. 20, 2010, pp. 1-25.
Answering Brief of Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc. and Belden CDT (Canada) Inc. in Opposition to Superior Essex Inc. and Superior Essex Communications LP's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the Patents-in-Suit, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Jan. 20, 2010, pp. 1-48.
Reply Claim Construction Brief of Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc. and Belden CDT (Canada) Inc., Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Feb. 17, 2010, pp.. 1-28.
Reply Brief of Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc. and Belden CDT (Canada), Inc. In Support of their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. 2 No. Patent Invalidity by Anticipation, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Feb. 17, 2010, pp. 1-26.
Superior Essex Inc.'s and Superior Essex Communications LP's Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Proposed Claim Constructions, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Feb. 17, 2010, pp. 1-29.
Opening Claim Construction Brief of Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc. and Belden CDT (Canada), Inc. from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 4, 2009, pp. 1-49.
Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc.'s and Belden CDT (Canada), Inc.'s Memorandum in Support of their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. 1: Patent Infringement, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 4, 2009, pp. 1-43.
Declaration of Michelle A. Flores in Support of Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc.'s and Belden CDT (Canada) Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. 1: Patent Infringement, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 11, 2009, pp. 1-17.
Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc.'s and Belden CDT (Canada), Inc.'s Memorandum in Support of their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. 2: No Patent Invalidity by Anticipation, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 4, 2009, pp. 1-50.
Declaration of Michelle A. Flores in Support of Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc.'s and Belden CDT (Canada) Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. 2: No Patent Invalidity by Anticipation, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 11, 2009, pp. 1-5.
Defendant's Opening Claim Construction Brief, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 4, 2009, pp. 1-47.
Superior Essex Inc.'s and Superior Essex Communications LP's Opening Brief in Support of Their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 4, 2009, pp. 1-25.
Superior Essex Inc.'s and Superior Essex Communications LP's Opening Brief in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the Patents-in-Suit, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 4, 2009, pp. 1-47.
Second Supplemental Joint Appendix to Claim Construction Briefing, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Feb. 17, 2010, pp. 1-26.
Letter to Bob Grow, Chair IEEE 802.3 from Bob Jensen, Chair TIA TR 42, Subject: TR 42 Liaison to IEEE 802.3, Oct. 10, 2003, 2 pages.
Excerpts from Belden Inc., Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2008.
Complaint filed with Jury Demand against Superior Essex Inc., Superior Essex Communications LP—Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. (Filing fee $350, receipt No. 150554.)—filed by Belden Technologies Inc., Belden CDT (Canada) Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit a # 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C #4 Exhibit D# 5 Exhibit E # 6 Exhibit F# 7 Civil Cover Sheet #8 Acknowledgement of Consent Form) (lid) (Entered: Jan. 29, 2008).
Answer to Complaint, with Jury Demand, Counterclaim against Belden Technologies Inc., Belden CDT (Canada) Inc. by Superior Essex Inc., Superior Essex Communications LP. (Gaza, Anne) (Entered: Jun. 6, 2008).
Answer to Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim to Belden Technologies Inc., Belden CDT (Canada) Inc. (Shaw, John) (Entered: Jun. 12, 2008).
First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand against Superior Essex Inc., Superior Essex Communications LP-filed by Belden Technologies Inc., Belden CDT (Canada) Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-G) (Keller, Karen) (Entered: Feb. 25, 2009).
Answer to Amended Complaint with Pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Defendants demand a trial by jury of all issues so triable in this action. Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaim against Belden Technologies Inc. (Canada) Inc. by Superior Essex Inc., Superior Essex Communications LP (Gaza, Anne) (Entered: Mar. 16, 2009).
Second Amended Complaint against Superior Essex Inc., Superior Essex Communications LP—Filed by Belden Technologies Inc., Belden CDT (Canada) Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-H) (Poff, Adam) (Entered: Apr. 6, 2009).
Answer to Amended Complaint with Jury Demand, Counterclaim against Belden Technologies Inc., Belden CDT (Canada) Inc. by Superior Essex Inc., Superior Essex Communications LP (Brewington, Lori) (Entered: Apr. 23, 2009).
Claim Construction Chart by Belden CDT (Canada) Inc., Belden Technologies Inc., Superior Essex Communications LP, Superior Essex Inc. (Kraman, Pilar) (Entered: Nov. 16, 2009).
Joint Appendix re Claim Construction Brief—to all Claim Construction Briefing (vol. 1 of 3) by Belden CDT (Canada) Inc., Belden Technologies Inc., (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4A, # 5 Exhibit 4B, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6A, # 8 Exhibit 6B, # 9 Exhibit 6C, # 10 Exhibit 7, # 11 Exhibit 8A, # 12 Exhibit 8B, # 13 Exhibit 9, # 14 Exhibit 10A) (Kraman, Pilar) (Entered: Dec. 4, 2009).
Joint Appendix re Appendix, Claim Construction Opening Brief to All Claim Construction Briefing (vol. 2 of 3) by Belden CDT (Canada) Inc., Belden Technologies Inc., (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 10B, #2 Exhibit 11, # 3 Exhibit 12A, #4 Exhibit 12B, # 5 Exhibit 12C, # 6 Exhibit 12D, # 7 Exhibit 12E, # 8 Exhibit 12F, # 9 Exhibit 13, # 10 Exhibit 14A, # 11 Exhibit 14B, # 12 Exhibit 14C, (Kraman, Pilar) (Entered: Dec. 4, 2009).
C&M Corporation Engineering Design Guide, 3rd Edition, 1992, p. 11.
Declaration of Anne Shea Gaza, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 11, 2009, pp. 1-16.
Joint Appendix re Appendix, Appendix, Claim Construction Opening Brief to All Claim Construction Briefing (vol. 3 of 3) by Belden CDT (Canada) Inc., Belden Technologies Inc., (Attachments: (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 14D, #2 Exhibit 15, # 3 Exhibit 16A, #4 Exhibit 16B, # 5 Exhibit 16C, # 6 Exhibit 16D, # 7 Exhibit 16E, # 8 Exhibit 16F, # 9 Exhibit 16G, # 10 Exhibit 17, # 11 Exhibit 18, # 12 Exhibit 19, # 13 Exhibit 20, # 14 Exhibit 21, # 15 Exhibit 22, #16 Exhibit 23, # 17 Exhibit 24 through 29, (Kraman, Pilar) (Entered: Dec. 4, 2009).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110155419 A1 Jun 2011 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 09532837 Mar 2000 US
Child 10430365 US
Parent 08841440 Apr 1997 US
Child 09532837 US