1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to high-speed data communications cables using at least two twisted pairs of wires. More particularly, it relates to cables having a central core defining plural individual pair channels.
2. Related Art
High-speed data communications media in current usage include pairs of wire twisted together to form a balanced transmission line. Such pairs of wire are referred to as twisted pairs. One common type of conventional cable for high-speed data communications includes multiple twisted pairs. When twisted pairs are closely placed, such as in a cable, electrical energy may be transferred from one pair of a cable to another. Such energy transferred between pairs is undesirable and referred to as crosstalk. The Telecommunications Industry Association and Electronics Industry Association have defined standards for crosstalk, including TIA/EIA-568A. The International Electrotechnical Commission has also defined standards for data communication cable crosstalk, including ISO/IEC 11801. One high-performance standard for 1000 cable is ISO/IEC 11801, Category 5.
In conventional cable, each twisted pair of a cable has a specified distance between twists along the longitudinal direction, that distance being referred to as the pair lay. When adjacent twisted pairs have the same pair lay and/or twist direction, they tend to lie within a cable more closely spaced than when they have different pair lays and/or twist direction. Such close spacing increases the amount of undesirable crosstalk which occurs. Therefore, in some conventional cables, each twisted pair within the cable has a unique pair lay in order to increase the spacing between pairs and thereby to reduce the crosstalk between twisted pairs of a cable. Twist direction may also be varied. Along with varying pair lays and twist directions, individual solid metal or woven metal pair shields are sometimes used to electromagnetically isolate pairs.
Shielded cable, although exhibiting better crosstalk isolation, is more difficult and time consuming to install and terminate. Shield conductors are generally terminated using special tools, devices and techniques adapted for the job.
One popular cable type meeting the above specifications is Unshielded Twisted Pair (UTP) cable. Because it does not include shield conductors, UTP is preferred by installers and plant managers, as it is easily installed and terminated. However, UTP fails to achieve superior crosstalk isolation, as required by state of the art transmission systems, even when varying pair lays are used.
Another solution to the problem of twisted pairs lying too closely together within a cable is embodied in a cable manufactured by Belden Wire & Cable Company as product number 1711A. This cable includes four twisted pair media radially disposed about a “+”-shaped core. Each twisted pair nests between two fins of the “+”-shaped core, being separated from adjacent twisted pairs by the core. This helps reduce and stabilize crosstalk between the twisted pair media. However, the core adds substantial cost to the cable, as well as material which forms a potential fire hazard, as explained below, while achieving a crosstalk reduction of only about 5 dB.
In building design, many precautions are taken to resist the spread of flame and the generation of and spread of smoke throughout a building in case of an outbreak of fire. Clearly, it is desired to protect against loss of life and also to minimize the costs of a fire due to the destruction of electrical and other equipment. Therefore, wires and cables for in building installations are required to comply with the various flammability requirements of the National Electrical Code (NEC) and/or the Canadian Electrical Code (CEC).
Cables intended for installation in the air handling spaces (ie. plenums, ducts, etc.) of buildings are specifically required by NEC or CEC to pass the flame test specified by Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL), UL-910, or it's Canadian Standards Association (CSA) equivalent, the FT6. The UL-910 and the FT6 represent the top of the fire rating hierarchy established by the NEC and CEC respectively. Cables possessing this rating, generically known as “plenum” or “plenum rated”, may be substituted for cables having a lower rating (ie. CMR, CM, CMX, FT4, FT1 or their equivalents), while lower rated cables may not be used where plenum rated cable is required.
Cables conforming to NEC or CEC requirements are characterized as possessing superior resistance to ignitability, greater resistant to contribute to flame spread and generate lower levels of smoke during fires than cables having a lower fire rating. Conventional designs of data grade telecommunications cables for installation in plenum chambers have a low smoke generating jacket material, e.g. of a PVC formulation or a fluoropolymer material, surrounding a core of twisted conductor pairs, each conductor individually insulated with a fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) insulation layer. Cable produced as described above satisfies recognized plenum test requirements such as the “peak smoke” and “average smoke” requirements of the Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., UL910 Steiner test and/or Canadian Standards Association CSA-FT6 (Plenum Flame Test) while also achieving desired electrical performance in accordance with EIA/TIA-568A for high frequency signal transmission.
While the above-described conventional cable including the Belden 1711A cable due in part to their use of FEP meets all of the above design criteria, the use of fluorinated ethylene propylene is extremely expensive and may account for up to 60% of the cost of a cable designed for plenum usage.
The solid core of the Belden 1711A cable contributes a large volume of fuel to a cable fire. Forming the core of a fire resistant material, such as FEP, is very costly due to the volume of material used in the core.
Solid flame retardant/smoke suppressed polyolefin may also be used in connection with FEP. Solid flame retardant/smoke suppressed polyolefin compounds commercially available all possess dielectric properties inferior to that of FEP. In addition, they also exhibit inferior resistance to burning and generally produce more smoke than FEP under burning conditions than FEP.
This invention provides an improved data cable.
According to one embodiment, the cable includes a plurality of transmission media; a core having a surface defining recesses within which each of the plurality of transmission media are individually disposed; and an outer jacket maintaining the plurality of data transmission media in position with respect to the core.
According to another embodiment of the invention, a cable includes a plurality of transmission media radially disposed about a core having a surface with features which maintain a separation between each of the plurality of transmission media.
Finally, according to yet another embodiment of the invention, there is a method of producing a cable. The method first passes a plurality of transmission media and a core through a first die which aligns the plurality of transmission media with surface features of the core and prevents twisting motion of the core. Next, the method bunches the aligned plurality of transmission media and core using a second die which forces each of the plurality of transmission media into contact with the surface features of the core which maintain a spatial relationship between each of the plurality of transmission media. Finally, the bunched plurality of transmission media and core are twisted to close the cable, and the closed cable is jacketed.
In the drawings, in which like reference numerals designate like elements:
An embodiment of the invention is now described in which a cable is constructed to include four twisted pairs of wire and a core having a unique profile. However, the invention is not limited to the number of pairs or the profile used in this embodiment. The inventive principles can be applied to cables including greater or fewer numbers of twisted pairs and different core profiles. Also, although this embodiment of the invention is described and illustrated in connection with twisted pair data communication media, other high-speed data communication media can be used in constructions of cable according to the invention.
This illustrative embodiment of the invention, as shown in
The above-described embodiment can be constructed using a number of different materials. While the invention is not limited to the materials now given, the invention is advantageously practiced using these materials. The core material should be a conductive material or one containing a powdered ferrite, the core material being generally compatible with use in data communications cable applications, including any applicable fire safety standards. In non-plenum applications, the core can be formed of solid or foamed flame retardant polyolefin or similar materials. In plenum applications, the core can be any one or more of the following compounds: a solid low dielectric constant fluoropolymer, e.g., ethylene chlortrifluoroethylene (E-CTFE) or fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), a foamed fluoropolymer, e.g., foamed FEP, and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) in either solid, low dielectric constant form or foamed. A filler is added to the compound to render the extruded product conductive. Suitable fillers are those compatible with the compound into which they are mixed, including but not limited to powdered ferrite, semiconductive thermoplastic elastomers and carbon black. Conductivity of the core helps to further isolate the twisted pairs from each other.
A conventional four-pair cable including a non-conductive core, such as the Belden 1711A cable, reduces nominal crosstalk by up to 5 dB over similar, four-pair cable without the core. By making the core conductive, crosstalk is reduced a further 5 dB. Since both loading and jacket construction can affect crosstalk, these figures compare cables with similar loading and jacket construction.
The cable may be finished in any one of several conventional ways, as shown in
Greater crosstalk isolation is achieved in the construction of
A method of making cable in accordance with the above-described embodiments is now described.
As is known in this art, when plural elements are cabled together, an overall twist is imparted to the assembly to improve geometric stability and help prevent separation. In embodiments of the present invention, twisting of the profile of the core along with the individual twisted pairs is controlled. The process allows the extruded core to maintain a physical spacing between the twisted pairs and maintains geometrical stability within the cable. Thus, the process assists in the achievement of and maintenance of high crosstalk isolation by placing a conductive core in the cable to maintain pair spacing.
Cables of the previously described embodiments, can be made by a three-part die system. However, methods of making such cables are not limited to a three-part die system, as more or fewer die elements can be constructed to incorporate the features of the invention.
The extruded core is drawn from a payoff reel (not shown) through the central opening 401 in die 403. Four twisted pairs are initially aligned with the core by passing through openings 405 in die 403. The core is next brought through opening 407 and brought together with the four twisted pairs which are passed through openings 409 in a second die 411, then cabled with the twisted pairs which are pushed into the channels of the core by a third die 413, in an operation called bunching. The second die 411 eliminates back twist, which is inherent in bunching operations, thus allowing the third die 413 to place the pairs in the channels prior to the twisting. The cable twist is imparted to the cable assembly after the second die 411, which locates the twisted pairs relative to the extruded core profile.
Although the method of making cable has been described in connection with an extruded core delivered into the process from a payoff reel, the invention is not so limited. For example, the core could be extruded immediately prior to use and transferred directly from the extruder to the central opening 401 of the first die 403. In another variation, the core could be extruded directly through a properly shaped central opening of either the first die 403 or the second die 411.
The present invention has now been described in connection with a number of specific embodiments thereof. However, numerous modifications which are contemplated as falling within the scope of the present invention should now be apparent to those skilled in the art. Therefore, it is intended that the scope of the present invention be limited only by the scope of the claims appended hereto.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/532,837, filed Mar. 21, 2000 entitled Enhanced Data Cable with Cross-Twist Cabled Core Profile and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,596,944, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/841,440, filed Apr. 22, 1997 entitled Making Enhanced Data Cable with Cross-Twist Cabled Core Profile (as amended), and now U.S. Pat. No. 6,074,503.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
483285 | Guilleaume | Sep 1892 | A |
514925 | Guilleaume | Feb 1894 | A |
524452 | Ebel et al. | Aug 1894 | A |
867659 | Hoopes et al. | Oct 1907 | A |
1008370 | Robillot | Nov 1911 | A |
1132452 | Davis | Mar 1915 | A |
1389143 | Kempton | Aug 1921 | A |
1700606 | Beaver | Jan 1929 | A |
1940917 | Okazaki | Dec 1933 | A |
1977209 | Sargent | Oct 1934 | A |
1995201 | Delon | Mar 1935 | A |
2041842 | Layton | May 1936 | A |
2149772 | Hunter et al. | Mar 1939 | A |
2204737 | Swallow et al. | Jun 1940 | A |
2218830 | Rose et al. | Oct 1940 | A |
2344501 | Bennett | Mar 1944 | A |
2538019 | Lee | Jan 1947 | A |
2501457 | Thelin | Mar 1950 | A |
2583025 | Swift et al. | Jan 1952 | A |
2583026 | Swift et al. | Jan 1952 | A |
2792442 | Parce | May 1957 | A |
2804494 | Fenton | Aug 1957 | A |
2882676 | Bryan et al. | Apr 1959 | A |
3032604 | Timmons | May 1962 | A |
3055967 | Bondon | Sep 1962 | A |
3209064 | Cutler | Sep 1965 | A |
3259687 | Oatess et al. | Jul 1966 | A |
3328510 | White | Jun 1967 | A |
3340112 | Davis et al. | Sep 1967 | A |
3350647 | Gabriel et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3363047 | Grove | Jan 1968 | A |
3364305 | Hanlon et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3489844 | Motley | Jan 1970 | A |
3559390 | Staschewski et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
3588313 | Delves-Broughton | Jun 1971 | A |
3603715 | Eilhardt et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3610814 | Peacock | Oct 1971 | A |
3621118 | Bunish et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3644659 | Campbell | Feb 1972 | A |
3649744 | Coleman | Mar 1972 | A |
3715877 | Akachi | Feb 1973 | A |
3775548 | Zinser et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3819443 | Simons et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3823255 | La Gase et al. | Jul 1974 | A |
3881052 | Britz et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
3888710 | Burk | Jun 1975 | A |
3911200 | Simons et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3921378 | Spicer et al. | Nov 1975 | A |
3927247 | Timmons | Dec 1975 | A |
3945974 | Schwarcz et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3999003 | Chevrolet et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4034148 | Lang | Jul 1977 | A |
4038489 | Stenson et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4205899 | King et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4257675 | Nakagome et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4319940 | Arroyo et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4327246 | Kincaid | Apr 1982 | A |
4361381 | Williams | Nov 1982 | A |
4374888 | Bornslaeger | Feb 1983 | A |
4385485 | Yonechi | May 1983 | A |
4393582 | Arnold, Jr. et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4401366 | Hope | Aug 1983 | A |
4401845 | Odhner et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4406914 | Kincaid | Sep 1983 | A |
4412094 | Dougherty et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4428787 | Pan et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4446689 | Hardin et al. | May 1984 | A |
4447122 | Sutehall | May 1984 | A |
4453031 | Justiss | Jun 1984 | A |
4456331 | Whitehead et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4474426 | Yataki | Oct 1984 | A |
4487992 | Tomita | Dec 1984 | A |
4500748 | Klein | Feb 1985 | A |
4510346 | Bursh, Jr. et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4510348 | Arroyo et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4549041 | Shingo et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4568401 | Davis | Feb 1986 | A |
4595793 | Arroyo et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4600268 | Spicer | Jul 1986 | A |
RE32225 | Neuroth | Aug 1986 | E |
4605818 | Arroyo et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4644098 | Norris et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4645628 | Gill | Feb 1987 | A |
4654476 | Barnicol-Ottler et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4661406 | Gruhn et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4683349 | Takebe | Jul 1987 | A |
4697051 | Beggs et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4710594 | Walling et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4712368 | Garner | Dec 1987 | A |
4719319 | Tighe, Jr. | Jan 1988 | A |
4729409 | Paul | Mar 1988 | A |
4755629 | Beggs et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4767891 | Biegon et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4777325 | Siwinski | Oct 1988 | A |
4778246 | Carroll | Oct 1988 | A |
4784461 | Abe et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4784462 | Priaroggia | Nov 1988 | A |
4788088 | Kohl | Nov 1988 | A |
4800236 | Lemke | Jan 1989 | A |
4804702 | Bartoszek | Feb 1989 | A |
4807962 | Arroyo et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4828352 | Kraft | May 1989 | A |
4873393 | Friesen et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4892442 | Shoffner | Jan 1990 | A |
4912283 | O'Connor | Mar 1990 | A |
4935467 | Cheng | Jun 1990 | A |
4941729 | Hardin et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4963609 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4987394 | Harman et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5000539 | Gareis | Mar 1991 | A |
5010210 | Sidi | Apr 1991 | A |
5015800 | Vaupotic et al. | May 1991 | A |
5037999 | VanDeusen | Aug 1991 | A |
5043530 | Davies | Aug 1991 | A |
5068497 | Krieger | Nov 1991 | A |
5073682 | Walling et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5077449 | Cornibert et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5087110 | Inagaki et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5097099 | Miller | Mar 1992 | A |
5107076 | Bullock et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5132488 | Tessier et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5132490 | Aldissi | Jul 1992 | A |
5132491 | Mulrooney et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5132788 | Hirota | Jul 1992 | A |
5142100 | Faupotic | Aug 1992 | A |
5149915 | Brunker et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5155304 | Gossett et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5155789 | Le Noane et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5162609 | Adriaenssens et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5170010 | Aldissi | Dec 1992 | A |
5177809 | Zeidler | Jan 1993 | A |
5180884 | Aldissi | Jan 1993 | A |
5180890 | Pendergrass | Jan 1993 | A |
5202946 | Hardin et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5212350 | Gebs | May 1993 | A |
5216202 | Yoshida et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5220130 | Walters | Jun 1993 | A |
5222177 | Chau et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5227417 | Kroushl | Jul 1993 | A |
5238328 | Adams et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5245134 | Vana, Jr. et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5283390 | Hubis | Feb 1994 | A |
5289556 | Rawlyk et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5298680 | Kenny | Mar 1994 | A |
5304739 | Klug et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305797 | Roy, Sr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5313020 | Sackett | May 1994 | A |
5329064 | Tash et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5355427 | Gareis et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5399813 | McNeill | Mar 1995 | A |
5418878 | Sass et al. | May 1995 | A |
5424491 | Walling et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5434354 | Baker et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5444184 | Hassel | Aug 1995 | A |
5486649 | Gareis | Jan 1996 | A |
5493071 | Newmoyer | Feb 1996 | A |
5514837 | Kenny et al. | May 1996 | A |
5541361 | Friesen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544270 | Clark et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5557698 | Gareis et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563377 | Arpin et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5574250 | Hardie et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5576515 | Bleich et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5600097 | Bleich et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606151 | Siekierka et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5619016 | Newmoyer | Apr 1997 | A |
5658406 | Walling et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659152 | Horie et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5666452 | Deitz, Sr. et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5670748 | Gingue | Sep 1997 | A |
5696295 | Wulff et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5698323 | Keough et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699467 | Kojima et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5763823 | Siekierka et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5767411 | Maron | Jun 1998 | A |
5789711 | Gaeris et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796046 | Newmoyer et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5821466 | Clark et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821467 | O'Brien et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5834697 | Baker et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841072 | Gagnon et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5883334 | Newmoyer et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5900588 | Springer et al. | May 1999 | A |
5920672 | White | Jul 1999 | A |
5936205 | Newmoyer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5952607 | Friesen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5952615 | Prudhon | Sep 1999 | A |
5956445 | Deitz, Sr. et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5969295 | Boucino et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5990419 | Bogese, II | Nov 1999 | A |
6037546 | Mottine et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6074503 | Clark et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091025 | Cotter et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6099345 | Milner et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6140587 | Sackett | Oct 2000 | A |
6150612 | Grandy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6153826 | Kenny et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162992 | Clark et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169251 | Grant et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6194663 | Friesen et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6211467 | Berelsman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222129 | Siekierka et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222130 | Gareis et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6248954 | Clark et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6255593 | Reede | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272858 | Takano et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288340 | Arnould | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297454 | Gareis | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300573 | Horie et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303867 | Clark et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310295 | Despard | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318062 | Doherty | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6355876 | Morimoto | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6365836 | Blouin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378283 | Barton | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392152 | Mottine, Jr. et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6403887 | Kebabjian et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6441308 | Gagnon | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452094 | Donner et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6462268 | Hazy et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6506976 | Neveux, Jr. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6566607 | Walling | May 2003 | B1 |
6570095 | Clark et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6596944 | Clark et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6624359 | Bahlmann et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6639152 | Glew et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6686537 | Gareis et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6687437 | Starnes et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6770819 | Patel | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6787697 | Stipes et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6800811 | Boucino | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6812408 | Clark et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6815611 | Gareis | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6818832 | Hopkinson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6855889 | Gareis | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6858804 | Murakami et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6888070 | Prescott | May 2005 | B1 |
6897382 | Hager et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6974913 | Bahlmann et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6998537 | Clark et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7015397 | Clark | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7030321 | Clark | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7049523 | Shuman et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053310 | Clark | May 2006 | B2 |
7064277 | Lique et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7098405 | Glew | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7109424 | Nordin et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7115815 | Kenny et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7135641 | Clark | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7145080 | Boisvert et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7154043 | Clark | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7157644 | Lique et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7173189 | Hazy et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7179999 | Clark | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7196271 | Cornibert et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7208683 | Clark | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214880 | Wiekhorst et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7214884 | Kenny et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7220918 | Kenny et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7238885 | Lique et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7238886 | Wiekhorst et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7244893 | Clark | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7256351 | Dillon et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7262366 | Clark | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7271342 | Stutzman et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7271343 | Clark | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7276664 | Gagnon | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7289332 | Clark | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7317163 | Lique et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7329815 | Kenny et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7339116 | Gareis et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7358436 | Dellagala et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7390971 | Jean et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7405360 | Clark et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7449638 | Clark et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7462782 | Clark | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7491888 | Clark | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7507910 | Park et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7534964 | Clark et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7622680 | Bricker et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7663061 | Gareis et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7977575 | Gareis et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20010013418 | Donner et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020050394 | Clark et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030106704 | Isley et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030230427 | Gareis | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040050578 | Hudson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055777 | Wiekhorst et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055779 | Wiekhorst et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055781 | Cornibert et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040118593 | Augustine et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040216913 | Wiekhorst et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040256139 | Clark | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050006132 | Clark | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050051355 | Bricker et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050092515 | Kenny et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050133246 | Parke et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060032660 | Parke et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060131054 | Lique et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060131055 | Lique et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060131057 | Lique et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060131058 | Lique et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060243477 | Jean et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070044994 | Park et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070044996 | Clark | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070209823 | Vexler et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080041609 | Gareis et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080164049 | Vexler et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090133895 | Allen | May 2009 | A1 |
20090173514 | Gareis | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1164064 | Mar 1984 | CA |
2058046 | Aug 1992 | CA |
2071417 | Dec 1993 | CA |
697378 | Oct 1940 | DE |
2459844 | Jul 1976 | DE |
9011484 | Nov 1990 | DE |
4336230 | Mar 1995 | DE |
0961296 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1087410 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1059343 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1085530 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1107262 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1117103 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1130604 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1162632 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1215688 | Jun 2002 | EP |
1548754 | Jun 2005 | EP |
694100 | Nov 1930 | FR |
1265877 | May 1961 | FR |
2706068 | Dec 1994 | FR |
342606 | Feb 1931 | GB |
725624 | Mar 1955 | GB |
2260216 | Apr 1993 | GB |
1942-10582 | Sep 1942 | JP |
S29-15973 | Dec 1955 | JP |
43-1986-15470 | Jun 1968 | JP |
S5197633331 | Aug 1976 | JP |
52-1977-76694 | Jun 1977 | JP |
5619817307 | Jan 1981 | JP |
5619818011 | Jan 1981 | JP |
61-1986-13507 | Jan 1986 | JP |
4332406 | Nov 1992 | JP |
5-101711 | Apr 1993 | JP |
8-1996-96635 | Apr 1996 | JP |
11-053958 | Feb 1999 | JP |
1343447 | Oct 1987 | SU |
WO 9624143 | Aug 1996 | WO |
WO 9848430 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 0051142 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0079545 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0108167 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0129828 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0129848 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO0154142 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO0193281 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO03077265 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO03094178 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO2005041219 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2005048274 | May 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bell Communications Research, “Generic Requirements for Optical Fiber and Optical Fiber Cable”, Aug. 5, 1986. |
Hitachi Cable Manchester, Customer Specification. |
Refi, “Fiber Optic Cable: A Lightguide,” 1991. |
Hawley, “Condensed Chemical Dictionary” 1981, pp. 471, 840, 841. |
Images of Belden 1711A Datatwist 300 4PR23 shielded cable, Sep. 11, 1995. |
Comprehensive Dictionary of Electrical Engineering 188 2nd ed., Phillip A. Laplante, Editor in Chief, 2005, 3 pages. |
Diminico, Chris, “Lower cost copper solutions may drive 1-Gigabit Ethernet”, Aug. 1, 2003, http://www.cablinginstall.com/articles/print/volume-11/issue-8/contents/installation/lower-cost-copper-solutions-may-drive-10-gigabit-ethernet.html, 6 pages. |
Electronics Engineers' Handbook 1.3.1., Donald Christiansen, Editor in Chief, Fourth Edition, 1997, 1 page. |
Hayes, Trent M., presentation entitled, “Evaluation of Alien Crosstalk in Cat 5e and Cat 6 Installations”, IEEE 802.3 10GBASE-T Study Group, Mar. 2003, 26 pages. |
Hitachi Cable Manchester, Inc., Product Specification Sheet, for “Category 5 Hi-NET Supra, Consisting of 4 Pairs, 24 AWG, Unshielded with an Overall Jacket, CMP, MPP, C(UL), Type FT6”, web-page publication, Apr. 23, 1977, pp. 1-7. |
International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US2006/047113, Apr. 3, 2007, 2 pages. |
File History of U.S. Patent No. 5,424,491, filed Oct. 8, 1993, Date of Patent: Jun. 13, 1995. |
File History of U.S. Patent No. 6,570,095, filed May 11, 2011, Date of Patent: May 27, 2003. |
File History of U.S. Patent No. 6,074,703, filed Apr. 22, 1999, Date of Patent: Jun. 13, 2000. |
File History of U.S. Patent No. 6,998,537, filed Jan. 3, 2003, Date of Patent: Feb. 14, 2006. |
File History of U.S. Patent No. 6,596,944, filed Mar. 21, 2000, Date of Patent: Jul. 22, 2003. |
File History of U.S. Patent No. 7,339,116, filed Jan. 18, 2001, Date of Patent: Mar. 4, 2008. |
File History of U.S. Patent No. 7,199,999, filed Oct. 11, 2005, Date of Patent: Apr. 3, 2007. |
Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, Nov. 28, 2009, 1 page. |
Declaration of Anne Shea Gaza, Redacted Public Version from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Jan. 20, 2010, pp. 1-55. |
Responsive Claims Construction Brief of Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc. and Belden CDT (Canada) Inc., Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Jan. 20, 2010, pp. 1-49. |
Superior Essex Inc.'s and Superior Essex Communications LP's Answering Brief in Opposition to Belden's Motion from Summary Judgment of No. Patent Invalidity by Anticipation, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-Slr, Feb. 3, 2010, pp. 1-51. |
Answer to Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc. and Belden CDT (Canada) Inc.'s Answer to Defendants Superior Essex Inc. and Superior Essex Communications LP's Counterclaims; by Belden Technologies, Inc., Belden CDT (Canada) Inc. (Poff, Adam) (Entered: May 11, 2009). |
Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc. and Belden CDT (Canada), Inc.'s Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. 1: Patent Infringement, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Feb. 17, 2010, pp. 1-22. |
Superior Essex Inc.'s and Superior Essex Communications LP's Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Feb. 17, 2010, pp. 1-24. |
Superior Essex Inc.'s and Superior Essex Communications LP's Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the Patents-In-Suit, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Feb. 17, 2010, pp. 1-25. |
Declaration of Anne Shea Gaza, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Feb. 17, 2010, pp. 1-89. |
Superior Essex Inc.'s and Superior Essex Communications LP's Answering Brief in Opposition to Belden's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Patent Infringement, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Jan. 20, 2010, pp. 1-32. |
Superior Essex Inc.'s and Superior Essex Communications LP's Memorandum in Opposition to Belden's Proposed Claim Constructions, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Jan. 20, 2010, pp. 1-48. |
Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc. and Belden CDT (Canada), Inc.'s Answering Brief in Opposition to Superior Essex Inc. and Superior Essex Communications LP's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SR, Jan. 20, 2010, pp. 1-25. |
Answering Brief of Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc. and Belden CDT (Canada) Inc. in Opposition to Superior Essex Inc. and Superior Essex Communications LP's Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the Patents-in-Suit, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Jan. 20, 2010, pp. 1-48. |
Reply Claim Construction Brief of Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc. and Belden CDT (Canada) Inc., Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Feb. 17, 2010, pp.. 1-28. |
Reply Brief of Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc. and Belden CDT (Canada), Inc. In Support of their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. 2 No. Patent Invalidity by Anticipation, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Feb. 17, 2010, pp. 1-26. |
Superior Essex Inc.'s and Superior Essex Communications LP's Reply Brief in Support of Defendants' Proposed Claim Constructions, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Feb. 17, 2010, pp. 1-29. |
Opening Claim Construction Brief of Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc. and Belden CDT (Canada), Inc. from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 4, 2009, pp. 1-49. |
Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc.'s and Belden CDT (Canada), Inc.'s Memorandum in Support of their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. 1: Patent Infringement, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 4, 2009, pp. 1-43. |
Declaration of Michelle A. Flores in Support of Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc.'s and Belden CDT (Canada) Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. 1: Patent Infringement, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 11, 2009, pp. 1-17. |
Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc.'s and Belden CDT (Canada), Inc.'s Memorandum in Support of their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. 2: No Patent Invalidity by Anticipation, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 4, 2009, pp. 1-50. |
Declaration of Michelle A. Flores in Support of Plaintiffs Belden Technologies, Inc.'s and Belden CDT (Canada) Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. 2: No Patent Invalidity by Anticipation, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 11, 2009, pp. 1-5. |
Defendant's Opening Claim Construction Brief, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 4, 2009, pp. 1-47. |
Superior Essex Inc.'s and Superior Essex Communications LP's Opening Brief in Support of Their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 4, 2009, pp. 1-25. |
Superior Essex Inc.'s and Superior Essex Communications LP's Opening Brief in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the Patents-in-Suit, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 4, 2009, pp. 1-47. |
Second Supplemental Joint Appendix to Claim Construction Briefing, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Feb. 17, 2010, pp. 1-26. |
Letter to Bob Grow, Chair IEEE 802.3 from Bob Jensen, Chair TIA TR 42, Subject: TR 42 Liaison to IEEE 802.3, Oct. 10, 2003, 2 pages. |
Excerpts from Belden Inc., Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2008. |
Complaint filed with Jury Demand against Superior Essex Inc., Superior Essex Communications LP—Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. (Filing fee $350, receipt No. 150554.)—filed by Belden Technologies Inc., Belden CDT (Canada) Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit a # 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C #4 Exhibit D# 5 Exhibit E # 6 Exhibit F# 7 Civil Cover Sheet #8 Acknowledgement of Consent Form) (lid) (Entered: Jan. 29, 2008). |
Answer to Complaint, with Jury Demand, Counterclaim against Belden Technologies Inc., Belden CDT (Canada) Inc. by Superior Essex Inc., Superior Essex Communications LP. (Gaza, Anne) (Entered: Jun. 6, 2008). |
Answer to Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim to Belden Technologies Inc., Belden CDT (Canada) Inc. (Shaw, John) (Entered: Jun. 12, 2008). |
First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand against Superior Essex Inc., Superior Essex Communications LP-filed by Belden Technologies Inc., Belden CDT (Canada) Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-G) (Keller, Karen) (Entered: Feb. 25, 2009). |
Answer to Amended Complaint with Pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Defendants demand a trial by jury of all issues so triable in this action. Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaim against Belden Technologies Inc. (Canada) Inc. by Superior Essex Inc., Superior Essex Communications LP (Gaza, Anne) (Entered: Mar. 16, 2009). |
Second Amended Complaint against Superior Essex Inc., Superior Essex Communications LP—Filed by Belden Technologies Inc., Belden CDT (Canada) Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-H) (Poff, Adam) (Entered: Apr. 6, 2009). |
Answer to Amended Complaint with Jury Demand, Counterclaim against Belden Technologies Inc., Belden CDT (Canada) Inc. by Superior Essex Inc., Superior Essex Communications LP (Brewington, Lori) (Entered: Apr. 23, 2009). |
Claim Construction Chart by Belden CDT (Canada) Inc., Belden Technologies Inc., Superior Essex Communications LP, Superior Essex Inc. (Kraman, Pilar) (Entered: Nov. 16, 2009). |
Joint Appendix re Claim Construction Brief—to all Claim Construction Briefing (vol. 1 of 3) by Belden CDT (Canada) Inc., Belden Technologies Inc., (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4A, # 5 Exhibit 4B, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6A, # 8 Exhibit 6B, # 9 Exhibit 6C, # 10 Exhibit 7, # 11 Exhibit 8A, # 12 Exhibit 8B, # 13 Exhibit 9, # 14 Exhibit 10A) (Kraman, Pilar) (Entered: Dec. 4, 2009). |
Joint Appendix re Appendix, Claim Construction Opening Brief to All Claim Construction Briefing (vol. 2 of 3) by Belden CDT (Canada) Inc., Belden Technologies Inc., (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 10B, #2 Exhibit 11, # 3 Exhibit 12A, #4 Exhibit 12B, # 5 Exhibit 12C, # 6 Exhibit 12D, # 7 Exhibit 12E, # 8 Exhibit 12F, # 9 Exhibit 13, # 10 Exhibit 14A, # 11 Exhibit 14B, # 12 Exhibit 14C, (Kraman, Pilar) (Entered: Dec. 4, 2009). |
C&M Corporation Engineering Design Guide, 3rd Edition, 1992, p. 11. |
Declaration of Anne Shea Gaza, Redacted Public Version, from Delaware District Court C.A. No. 08-063-SLR, Dec. 11, 2009, pp. 1-16. |
Joint Appendix re Appendix, Appendix, Claim Construction Opening Brief to All Claim Construction Briefing (vol. 3 of 3) by Belden CDT (Canada) Inc., Belden Technologies Inc., (Attachments: (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 14D, #2 Exhibit 15, # 3 Exhibit 16A, #4 Exhibit 16B, # 5 Exhibit 16C, # 6 Exhibit 16D, # 7 Exhibit 16E, # 8 Exhibit 16F, # 9 Exhibit 16G, # 10 Exhibit 17, # 11 Exhibit 18, # 12 Exhibit 19, # 13 Exhibit 20, # 14 Exhibit 21, # 15 Exhibit 22, #16 Exhibit 23, # 17 Exhibit 24 through 29, (Kraman, Pilar) (Entered: Dec. 4, 2009). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110155419 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09532837 | Mar 2000 | US |
Child | 10430365 | US | |
Parent | 08841440 | Apr 1997 | US |
Child | 09532837 | US |