Various novel decking systems and methods are presented, each effective for deck assembly facilitation. In one or more various aspects, for example, a decking method includes but is not limited to mounting a deck fascia board to a deck joist and another deck fascia board to a deck rim joist and subsequently mounting a fascia-expansion-accommodation corner covering having a first mounting layer and a second mounting layer and a stress distribution hinge so that the first and second mounting layers each have a mounting surface and a fascia expansion overlap lip and so that the fascia expansion overlap lips each overlap an end of a respective one of the deck fascia boards. In some variants the corner covering may be made of a plastic or composite by molding, extruding, or planing operations. The stress distribution hinge operably couples the first mounting layer to the second mounting layer so that a half-plane adjacent the mounting surface of the first mounting layer and a half-plane adjacent the mounting surface of the second mounting layer are both bounded by a single line along the stress distribution hinge, so that the fascia expansion overlap lip of the first mounting layer is configured to remain against a first of the deck fascia boards (notwithstanding longitudinal expansion or contraction thereof, e.g.), and so that the fascia expansion overlap lip of the second mounting layer is configured to remain against a second of the deck fascia boards. In addition to the foregoing, other method aspects are described in the claims, drawings, and text forming a part of the disclosure set forth herein.
An embodiment provides a decking system. In one implementation, the decking system includes but is not limited to a fascia-expansion-accommodation corner covering having a first mounting layer and a second mounting layer and a stress distribution hinge, the first and second mounting layers each having a mounting surface and a fascia expansion overlap lip, the stress distribution hinge operably coupling the first mounting layer to the second mounting layer so that a half-plane adjacent the mounting surface of the first mounting layer and a half-plane adjacent the mounting surface of the second mounting layer are both bounded by a single line along the stress distribution hinge and so that the fascia expansion overlap lip of the first mounting layer is configured to remain against a first deck fascia board notwithstanding a longitudinal expansion of the first deck fascia board and so that the fascia expansion overlap lip of the second mounting layer is configured to remain against a second deck fascia board notwithstanding a longitudinal expansion of the second deck fascia board.
Some variants comprise a railpost support that includes a baseplate and a plurality of flexible finger mounts and a sleeve section, optionally made from sheet metal that is laser cut or stamped and punched and bent. One or more tensile elements (screws, e.g.) are configured to hold the baseplate removably in rigid engagement (metal-to-metal contact, e.g.) with at least a threaded portion of a railpost support interface. This can occur, for example, in a context in which one or more top surfaces of the railpost support interface are roughly even with (nominally flush with or within a few centimeters higher than) a walking surface of the deck (when adjacent decking boards are applied, e.g.) and in which the sleeve section is supported by the baseplate and supports the flexible finger mounts in contact with a railpost inserted into the sleeve section.
In addition to the foregoing, various other method and/or system and/or program product aspects are set forth and described in the teachings such as text (e.g., claims and/or detailed description) and/or drawings of the present disclosure. The foregoing is a summary and thus may contain simplifications, generalizations, inclusions, and/or omissions of detail; consequently, those skilled in the art (professional or do-it-yourself deck builders, e.g.) will appreciate that the summary is illustrative only and is NOT intended to be in any way limiting. Other aspects, features, and advantages of the devices and/or processes and/or other subject matter described herein will become apparent by reference to the detailed description, the corresponding drawings, and/or in the teachings set forth herein.
For a more complete understanding of embodiments, reference now is made to the following descriptions taken in connection with the accompanying drawings. The use of the same symbols in different drawings typically indicates similar or identical items, unless context dictates otherwise. The illustrative embodiments described in the detailed description, drawings, and claims are not meant to be limiting. Other embodiments may be utilized, and other changes may be made, without departing from the spirit or scope of the subject matter presented here.
In light of teachings herein, numerous existing techniques may be applied for implementing decking components with materials appropriate for achieving the significantly improved accommodation of thermal and assembly variations as described herein without undue experimentation. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 8,739,489 (“Decking system”); U.S. Pat. No. 8,714,887 (“Fascia counter-bore bit and fascia screw”); U.S. Pat. No. 8,516,777 (“Method of fabricating building wall panels”); U.S. Pat. No. 8,499,505 (“Pultruded trim members”); U.S. Pat. No. 8,371,556 (“Multi-function deck tool”); U.S. Pat. No. 8,322,097 (“Methods of constructing buildings and building appurtenances”); U.S. Pat. No. 8,291,647 (“Self-contained structure configurable as a shipping container and as a dwelling”); U.S. Pat. No. 8,272,190 (“Method of fabricating building wall panels”); U.S. Pat. No. 8,256,614 (“Interconnected and on-site severable deck clips with cooperating installation tool for joining two adjacent decking planks to an underlying support structure”); U.S. Pat. No. 8,091,500 (“Over-the-water dock”); U.S. Pat. No. 7,926,226 (“Deployable prefabricated structure with an extension structure that is sealable to the prefabricated structure upon deployment from the prefabricated structure”); U.S. Pat. No. 7,908,812 (“Decking system and anchoring device”); U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2013/0111840 (“Kit and assembly for compensating for coefficients of thermal expansion of decoratively mounted panels”); U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2012/0328823 (“Trim components for lapboard siding that are co-extruded from wood-plastic composites and polyvinyl chloride”); and U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2006/0076545 (“Railing assemblies and related methods and apparatuses”).
Those skilled in the art will recognize that some list items may also function as other list items. Each such listed term should not be narrowed by any implication from other terms in the same list but should instead be understood in its broadest reasonable interpretation as understood by those skilled in the art.
“Adhesed,” “adjacent,” “affixed,” “along,” “arranged,” “at least,” “at most,” “constructed,” “covering,” “first,” “from,” “further,” “integrally,” “irrespective,” “longitudinal,” “metallic,” “mounting,” “nominal,” “of,” “overlapping,” “recessed,” “remaining laterally adjacent,” “sealed,” “single,” “spanning,” “supporting,” “vertical,” “welded,” “toward,” or other such descriptors herein are used in their normal yes-or-no sense, not as terms of degree, unless context dictates otherwise. “To” is not used to articulate a mere intended purpose in phrases like “configured to,” moreover, but is used normally, in descriptively identifying a particular device or pattern that is actually performing or implementing a task or arrangement or to a structure that can serve this function without significant modification. “Substantially” is used herein (in relation to approximately ideal or aligned entities, e.g.) to refer to having a difference or deviation of at most about 2° or 2% or 2 millimeters, unless context dictates otherwise. Positional relation terms like “along” or “adjacent” are used herein to refer to nominal (substantially ideal, e.g.) relations, having a difference or deviation of at most about 2° or 2% or 2 millimeters, unless context dictates otherwise.
In some variants of convex-corner fascia expansion accommodation structure 1004, the half-plane 1162 adjacent the mounting surface 1156 of the first mounting layer 1155 and the half-plane 1162 adjacent the mounting surface 1156 of the second mounting layer 1155 form a nominal right angle configured to span both a joist (deck joist 236, e.g.) that supports the first deck fascia board 232 and a joist (deck rim joist 234, e.g.) that supports the second deck fascia board 233. Insofar that this nominal angle is less than 180°, the fascia-expansion-accommodation corner covering may be described as a “convex-corner” fascia expansion accommodation structure. Moreover the fascia expansion overlap lips as shown may (optionally) each have a nominal lip length 1152 of at least about 2 millimeters or at most about 2 centimeters. Also as shown the gap depth 1154 created by longitudinally recessed surface 1151 behind the lip may likewise be at least about 2 millimeters (at least about equal to a thickness of the first deck fascia board, e.g.) or at most about 2 centimeters. Moreover the thicker portion of the mounting layers 1155 of
In some variants (of deck 100 or deck 300, e.g.), the respective first mounting layers 1442 and second mounting layers 1443 thereof may be configured generally as described with regard to
Alternatively or additionally, the respective first mounting layers 1542 and second mounting layers 1543 thereof may be configured generally as described with regard to
One skilled in the art will recognize that the herein described components (e.g., operations), devices, objects, and the discussion accompanying them are used as examples for the sake of conceptual clarity and that various configuration modifications are contemplated. Consequently, as used herein, the specific exemplars set forth and the accompanying discussion are intended to be representative of their more general classes. In general, use of any specific exemplar is intended to be representative of its class, and the non-inclusion of specific components (e.g., operations), devices, and objects should not be taken limiting.
With respect to the use of substantially any plural and/or singular terms herein, those having skill in the art can translate from the plural to the singular and/or from the singular to the plural as is appropriate to the context and/or application. The various singular/plural permutations are not expressly set forth herein for sake of clarity.
The herein described subject matter sometimes illustrates different components contained within, or connected with, different other components. It is to be understood that such depicted architectures are merely exemplary, and that in fact many other architectures may be implemented which achieve the same functionality. In a conceptual sense, any arrangement of components to achieve the same functionality is effectively “associated” such that the desired functionality is achieved. Hence, any two components herein combined to achieve a particular functionality can be seen as “associated with” each other such that the desired functionality is achieved, irrespective of architectures or intermedial components. Likewise, any two components so associated can also be viewed as being “operably connected”, or “operably coupled,” to each other to achieve the desired functionality, and any two components capable of being so associated can also be viewed as being “operably couplable,” to each other to achieve the desired functionality. Specific examples of operably couplable include but are not limited to physically mateable and/or physically interacting components, and/or wirelessly interactable, and/or wirelessly interacting components, and/or logically interacting, and/or logically interactable components.
In some instances, one or more components may be referred to herein as “configured to,” “configurable to,” “operable/operative to,” “adapted/adaptable,” “able to,” “conformable/conformed to,” etc. Those skilled in the art will recognize that “configured to” can generally encompass active-state components and/or inactive-state components and/or standby-state components, unless context requires otherwise.
While particular aspects of the present subject matter described herein have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that, based upon the teachings herein, changes and modifications may be made without departing from the subject matter described herein and its broader aspects and, therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope all such changes and modifications as are within the true spirit and scope of the subject matter described herein. It will be understood by those within the art that, in general, terms used herein, and especially in the appended claims (e.g., bodies of the appended claims) are generally intended as “open” terms (e.g., the term “including” should be interpreted as “including but not limited to,” the term “having” should be interpreted as “having at least,” the term “includes” should be interpreted as “includes but is not limited to,” etc.). It will be further understood by those within the art that if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is intended, such an intent will be explicitly recited in the claim, and in the absence of such recitation no such intent is present. For example, as an aid to understanding, the following appended claims may contain usage of the introductory phrases “at least one” and “one or more” to introduce claim recitations. However, the use of such phrases should not be construed to imply that the introduction of a claim recitation by the indefinite articles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing such introduced claim recitation to claims containing only one such recitation, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases “one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or “an” (e.g., “a” and/or “an” should typically be interpreted to mean “at least one” or “one or more”); the same holds true for the use of definite articles used to introduce claim recitations. In addition, even if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is explicitly recited, those skilled in the art will recognize that such recitation should typically be interpreted to mean at least the recited number (e.g., the bare recitation of “two recitations,” without other modifiers, typically means at least two recitations, or two or more recitations). Furthermore, in those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B, and C, etc.” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one having skill in the art would understand the convention (e.g., “a system having at least one of A, B, and C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together, etc.). In those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B, or C, etc.” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one having skill in the art would understand the convention (e.g., “a system having at least one of A, B, or C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together, etc.). It will be further understood by those within the art that typically a disjunctive word and/or phrase presenting two or more alternative terms, whether in the description, claims, or drawings, should be understood to contemplate the possibilities of including one of the terms, either of the terms, or both terms unless context dictates otherwise. For example, the phrase “A or B” will be typically understood to include the possibilities of “A” or “B” or “A and B” in respective included configurations.
With respect to the numbered clauses and claims expressed below, all terms therein identify or describe one or more entities described above with particularity. With regard to methods described herein, those skilled in the art will appreciate that recited operations may generally be performed in any order, unless context dictates otherwise. Also, although various operational flows are presented in a sequence(s), it should be understood that the various operations may be performed in other orders than those which are illustrated, or may be performed concurrently. Examples of such alternate orderings may include overlapping, interleaved, interrupted, reordered, incremental, preparatory, supplemental, simultaneous, reverse, or other variant orderings, unless context dictates otherwise. Furthermore, terms like “responsive to,” “related to,” or other past-tense adjectives are generally not intended to exclude such variants, unless context dictates otherwise. Also in the numbered clauses below, specific combinations of aspects and embodiments are articulated in a shorthand form such that (1) according to respective embodiments, for each instance in which a “component” or other such identifiers appear to be introduced (with “a” or “an,” e.g.) more than once in a given chain of clauses, such designations may either identify the same entity or distinct entities; and (2) what might be called “dependent” clauses below may or may not incorporate, in respective embodiments, the features of “independent” clauses to which they refer or other features described above.
1. A decking system comprising:
a fascia-expansion-accommodation corner covering (any of fascia expansion accommodation structures 104, 1004, 1102, 1103, 1201, 1202, 1203, 1301, 1602, 1603, e.g.) having a first mounting layer and a second mounting layer and a stress distribution hinge, the first and second mounting layers each having a mounting surface and a fascia expansion overlap lip (any of lips 1150, 1250, 1450, 1550, e.g.), the stress distribution hinge (any of hinges 1141, 1241, 1441, 1541, e.g.) operably coupling the first mounting layer to the second mounting layer so that a half-plane (either of 1162, 1262, e.g.) adjacent the mounting surface of the first mounting layer and a half-plane adjacent the mounting surface of the second mounting layer are both bounded by a single line (substantially) along the stress distribution hinge and so that the fascia expansion overlap lip of the first mounting layer is configured to remain laterally (substantially) adjacent a first deck fascia board (any of deck fascia boards 133, 232, 233, 1032, 1033, 1231, 1232, 1432, 1433, 1532, 1533, e.g.) irrespective of a longitudinal expansion of or contraction of the first deck fascia board (of deck fascia board 1032 along axis 1072 or of deck fascia board 1033 along axis 1073, e.g.) and so that the fascia expansion overlap lip of the second mounting layer is configured to remain laterally adjacent a second deck fascia board irrespective of a longitudinal expansion of or contraction of the second deck fascia board.
2. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the fascia expansion overlap lip (lip 1250, e.g.) of the first mounting layer being less than half as thick as a remainder of the first mounting layer (mounting layer 1155, e.g.), the fascia expansion overlap lip of the second mounting layer being less than half as thick as a remainder of the second mounting layer.
3. The decking system of SYSTEM CLAUSE 1 further comprising:
the fascia expansion overlap lip (lip 1450, e.g.) of the first mounting layer being about as thick (within a factor of two, e.g.) as a remainder of the first mounting layer (either of layers 1442, 1443, e.g.), the fascia expansion overlap lip of the second mounting layer being about as thick as a remainder of the second mounting layer.
4. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
a first joist (any of deck rim joists 234, 1434 or deck joists 236, 1436, e.g.);
a second joist;
the first deck fascia board, being affixed to the first joist by a plurality of fascia board fasteners; and
the second deck fascia board, being affixed to the second joist by a plurality of fascia board fasteners, the fascia-expansion-accommodation corner covering including a fascia expansion accommodation structure and first and second spacers, a first fastener 1446 holding the first spacer 1421 in contact with both the fascia expansion accommodation structure 1301 and the first joist, a second fastener 1447 holding the second spacer 1422 in contact with both the fascia expansion accommodation structure 1301 and the second joist, the fascia-expansion-accommodation corner covering including the fascia expansion overlap lip of the first mounting layer and including the fascia expansion overlap lip of the second mounting layer, the first spacer being a component of the first mounting layer and about as thick as the first deck fascia board 1432, the second spacer being a component of the second mounting layer and about as thick as the second deck fascia board 1433.
5. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES 1-3 further comprising:
a first joist;
a second joist;
the first deck fascia board, being affixed to the first joist by a plurality of fascia board fasteners; and
the second deck fascia board, being affixed to the second joist by a plurality of fascia board fasteners, the first and second deck fascia boards each having a fastener non-engagement aperture (item 1586, e.g.) through which one or more gap-spanning fasteners (item 1596, e.g.) that support the fascia-expansion-accommodation corner covering pass.
6. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the single line being substantially vertical (within at most about 2°, e.g).
7. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the stress distribution hinge having a length (in a direction parallel to the single line, e.g.) of at least about 2 centimeters.
8. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the stress distribution hinge having a length (in a direction parallel to the single line, e.g.) of at most about 20 centimeters.
9. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the stress distribution hinge being at least about 0.5 millimeters thick (at its thinnest position, e.g.).
10. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the stress distribution hinge being at most about 5 millimeters thick (at its thinnest position, e.g.).
11. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
an entirety of the stress distribution hinge being at least 2 millimeters from the single line along the stress distribution hinge.
12. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
an entirety of the stress distribution hinge being at most 2 centimeters from the single line along the stress distribution hinge.
13. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the half-plane adjacent (at least) the mounting surface of (at least) the first mounting layer and (at least) the half-plane adjacent (at least) the mounting surface of (at least) the second mounting layer forming a (nominal) right angle spanning (at least) both a joist that supports the first deck fascia board and a joist that supports the second deck fascia board, the fascia-expansion-accommodation corner covering being a convex-corner fascia expansion accommodation structure.
14. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the half-plane adjacent the mounting surface of the first mounting layer and the half-plane adjacent the mounting surface of the second mounting layer forming an obtuse angle (nominally equal to 135° or 150°, e.g.) spanning both a joist that supports the first deck fascia board and a joist that supports the second deck fascia board, the fascia-expansion-accommodation corner covering being a convex-corner fascia expansion accommodation structure (any of items 1004, 1102, 1103, 1301, 1602, e.g.).
15. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES 1-13 further comprising:
the half-plane adjacent the mounting surface of the first mounting layer and the half-plane adjacent the mounting surface of the second mounting layer forming a reflex angle (reflex angle 1268, e.g.) spanning both a joist that supports the first deck fascia board (deck fascia board 1231, e.g.) and a joist that supports the second deck fascia board (deck fascia board 1232, e.g.), the fascia-expansion-accommodation corner covering being a concave-corner fascia expansion accommodation structure (any of items 1201, 1202, 1203, 1603, e.g.).
16. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the first and second mounting layers (any of layers 1042, 1043, 1155, 1442, 1443, 1542, 1543, e.g.) and the stress distribution hinge all having been formed of a single composition (vinyl or a mixture comprising a polymer, e.g.).
17. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the first mounting layer having a longitudinally recessed surface 1151 that forms a gap depth (between the fascia expansion overlap lip of the first mounting layer and the half-plane 1162, 1262 adjacent the mounting surface 1156, 1256 of the first mounting layer, e.g.) of at least about 2 millimeters, the gap depth being at least about equal to a thickness of the first deck fascia board.
18. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the first mounting layer having a longitudinally recessed surface that forms a gap depth (depth 1154, e.g.) of at most about 2 centimeters, the gap depth being at least about equal to a thickness of the first deck fascia board.
19. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the first and second mounting layers (any of layers 1042, 1043, 1155, 1442, 1443, 1542, 1543, e.g.) each having a nominal thickness of at least about 0.5 millimeters.
20. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the first and second mounting layers and the stress distribution hinge (any of hinges 1141, 1241, 1441, 1541, e.g.) all having been formed integrally by a single injection molding process (with one or more other processes but without a second injection molding process, e.g.)
21. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the first and second mounting layers each having a nominal thickness of at most about 5 millimeters.
22. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the first and second mounting layers (any of layers 1042, 1043, 1155, 1442, 1443, 1542, 1543, e.g.) each having a nominal thickness of at least about 3 millimeters.
23. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the first and second mounting layers each having a nominal thickness of at most about 3 centimeters.
24. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the fascia expansion overlap lips (any of lips 1150, 1250, 1450, 1550, e.g.) each having a nominal length of at least about 2 millimeters.
25. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the fascia expansion overlap lips each having a nominal length of at most about 2 centimeters.
26. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
the fascia expansion overlap lips each having a length greater than its thickness.
27. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
a railpost support interface (any of interfaces 260, 360, 960, e.g.) that includes a first mounting layer and a second mounting layer welded together and both welded to a substrate of the railpost support interface, the first mounting layer of the railpost support interface constructed and arranged to be supported by a first joist that also supports the first deck fascia board (any of deck fascia boards 133, 232, 1032, 1232, 1433, 1532, e.g.), the second mounting layer of the railpost support interface being constructed and arranged to be supported by a second joist that also supports the second deck fascia board.
28. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
a railpost support interface that includes a substrate supporting several baseplate support bosses (four or more bosses 513, 713, e.g.) and a rigid undercarriage welded to the substrate, the railpost support interface being supported by one or more fasteners having been (inserted through a joist and) self-tapped into the undercarriage, the railpost support interface constructed and arranged to be supported by (at least) a first joist that also supports the first deck fascia board.
29. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
a railpost support (any of items 320, 520, 920, e.g.) that includes a baseplate and a plurality of flexible finger mounts and a sleeve section, one or more tensile elements (screws configured to extend downward through the baseplate into a threaded portion of the railpost support interface, e.g.) being configured to hold the baseplate removably in rigid engagement with a railpost support interface mounted adjacent at least one of the first deck fascia board or the second deck fascia board, (a top of the railpost support interface being nominally flush with a top of the deck, e.g.) the sleeve section configured to be supported by the baseplate and to support the flexible finger mounts in contact with a railpost inserted (nominally vertically, e.g.) into the sleeve section.
30. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
a deck (deck 100 or deck 300, e.g.) comprising first and second joists and the first deck fascia board mounted on the first joist and the second deck fascia board mounted on the second joist and the fascia-expansion-accommodation corner covering substantially covering both a front of an end portion of the first deck fascia board and a front of an end portion of the second deck fascia board.
31. The decking system of any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES further comprising:
a deck that includes the fascia-expansion-accommodation corner covering, the first and second deck fascia boards, and one or more other deck or deck railing components identified in the respective SYSTEM CLAUSE(S).
32. A decking method comprising:
configuring a first joist and a second joist to form a corner therebetween; mounting a first deck fascia board medially covering a front of the first joist but not distally covering the front of the first joist;
mounting a second deck fascia board medially covering a front of the second joist but not distally covering the front of the second joist;
mounting a fascia-expansion-accommodation corner covering as described in any of the above SYSTEM CLAUSES so that the fascia expansion overlap lip of the first mounting layer thereof is configured to remain in front of (laterally adjacent, e.g.) the first deck fascia board irrespective of a longitudinal expansion of or contraction of the first deck fascia board and so that the fascia expansion overlap lip of the second mounting layer thereof is configured to remain in front of (laterally adjacent, e.g.) a second deck fascia board irrespective of a longitudinal expansion of or contraction of the second deck fascia board.
All of the patents and other publications referred to above (not including websites) are incorporated herein by reference generally—including those identified in relation to particular new applications of existing techniques—to the extent not inconsistent herewith. While various system, method, article of manufacture, or other embodiments or aspects have been disclosed above, also, other combinations of embodiments or aspects will be apparent to those skilled in the art in view of the above disclosure. The various embodiments and aspects disclosed above are for purposes of illustration and are not intended to be limiting, with the true scope and spirit being indicated in the final claim set
The present application claims benefit of priority of U.S. Prov. App. No. 61/959,379 and U.S. Prov. App. No. 61/959,380 (filed 22 Aug. 2013), both of which were filed within the twelve months preceding the filing date of the present application or is an application of which a currently co-pending application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3090087 | Miller | May 1963 | A |
3742668 | Oliver | Jul 1973 | A |
4189885 | Fritz | Feb 1980 | A |
5074084 | Kriss | Dec 1991 | A |
5459969 | Stibolt et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5542222 | Wilson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5771646 | DeSouza | Jun 1998 | A |
5901525 | Doeringer et al. | May 1999 | A |
5916101 | Stibolt | Jun 1999 | A |
6141928 | Platt | Nov 2000 | A |
6886296 | John et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
7908812 | Eberle, III | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7926226 | Pope | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8091500 | Stroud | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8235348 | Curtis | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8256614 | Wadsworth, Sr. | Sep 2012 | B1 |
8272190 | Schiffmann et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8291647 | Esposito | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8322097 | Schiffmann et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8371556 | Price | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8499505 | Pulte | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8516777 | Schiffmann et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8714887 | Tipps et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8739489 | Weber et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
20020038684 | Puppin | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20030037495 | Shaw | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050229531 | Green et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050284082 | Smith | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060076545 | Reynders et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070151180 | Pace et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070209316 | Walker | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20090038247 | Taylor | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090056235 | Morsching | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090056252 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077915 | Haga | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20120241703 | Regan | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120304568 | Aboukhalil | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120328823 | Monteer | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130111840 | Bordener | May 2013 | A1 |
20130219824 | Philbin et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140054428 | Walker et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140190092 | Klassen et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150000219 | Yarmo | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10105236 | Aug 2002 | DE |
Entry |
---|
Machine translation of DE 10105236A1, obtained from https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=DE103525915&recNum=1&maxRec=&office=&prevFilter=&sortOption=& queryString=&tab=PCTDescription (last accessed Mar. 11, 2016). |
George Schambach, “Durable Details for Vinyl Siding” (Jun. 1997), https://heightslibrary.org/materials/hrrc/20-Siding/VINYL_SIDING_DETAILS.pdf (last visited Jan. 6, 2017). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150052845 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61959379 | Aug 2013 | US | |
61959380 | Aug 2013 | US |