The current application is related to the co-owned and co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/907,423 filed on Mar. 31, 2005, and entitled “Generic User Input for GUI Framework”, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates generally to managing a set of program objects, and more particularly, to a solution for enhancing a user interface for displaying a set of properties for a program object.
Frequently, program objects, such as Java™ Beans defined by Sun Microsystems, Inc., include a set of configurable properties (Java and all Java-based trademarks are trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States, other countries, or both). To this extent, it is desirable to generate a user interface to enable a user to specify one or more of the configurable properties of a Java Bean. In order to generate the user interface, the configurable properties can be introspected from the Java Bean. Further, the configurable properties can be read from a file that includes information about the Java Bean.
For example, the Java 2 Platform, Enterprise Edition (J2EE) defines a J2EE Connector Architecture (CA) that includes a Resource Adapter. A J2EE CA Resource Adapter exposes an object to administration and development tools by specifying various information in a resource adapter deployment descriptor file (ra.xml). This file includes information on each configurable property, which is specified as name/type/value tuples. In this case, an administration and development tool can use the ra.xml file and/or the object to discover the corresponding configurable properties. These configurable properties are then included in a generic user interface that is presented to a user.
In view of the foregoing, there exists a need in the art to overcome one or more of the deficiencies indicated herein and/or one or more other deficiencies not expressly discussed herein.
The invention provides a solution for managing a program object that generates an enhanced user interface for displaying properties of the program object. A set of properties for the program object are obtained from the program object and/or deployment data for the program object. A property object that corresponds to the program object is also obtained. The property object defines a set of user interface attributes for the program object. The user interface then is generated based on the set of properties and the property object. As a result, a user interface that includes one or more features that makes it more user-friendly for a user can be generated. The program object can comprise, for example, a Java Bean. In one embodiment, the program object comprises a Java Bean that is implemented as part of a J2EE CA Resource Adapter, and the deployment data is stored in a deployment description file for the Resource Adapter, ra.xml.
A first aspect of the invention provides a method of managing a program object, the method comprising: obtaining a set of properties for the program object; obtaining a property object for the program object, the property object defining a set of user interface attributes for the program object; and generating a user interface based on the set of properties and the property object.
A second aspect of the invention provides a system for managing a program object, the system comprising: a system for obtaining a set of properties for the program object; a system for obtaining a property object for the program object, the property object defining a set of user interface attributes for the program object; and a system for generating a user interface based on the set of properties and the property object.
A third aspect of the invention provides a program product stored on a computer-readable medium, which when executed, enables a computer infrastructure to manage a program object, the program product comprising computer program code for enabling the computer infrastructure to: obtain a set of properties for the program object; obtain a property object for the program object, the property object defining a set of user interface attributes for the program object; and generate a user interface based on the set of properties and the property object.
A fourth aspect of the invention provides a method of generating a system for managing a program object, the method comprising: providing a computer infrastructure operable to: obtain a set of properties for the program object; obtain a property object for the program object, the property object defining a set of user interface attributes for the program object; and generate a user interface based on the set of properties and the property object.
A fifth aspect of the invention provides a method for managing a set of program objects, the method comprising managing a computer infrastructure that performs the process described herein; and receiving payment based on the managing.
The illustrative aspects of the present invention are designed to solve one or more of the problems herein described and/or one or more other problems not discussed.
These and other features of the invention will be more readily understood from the following detailed description of the various aspects of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings that depict various embodiments of the invention, in which:
It is noted that the drawings are not to scale. The drawings are intended to depict only typical aspects of the invention, and therefore should not be considered as limiting the scope of the invention. In the drawings, like numbering represents like elements between the drawings.
As indicated above, the invention provides a solution for managing a program object that generates an enhanced user interface for displaying properties of the program object. A set of properties for the program object are obtained from the program object and/or deployment data for the program object. A property object that corresponds to the program object is also obtained. The property object defines a set of user interface attributes for the program object. The user interface then is generated based on the set of properties and the property object. As a result, a user interface that includes one or more features that makes it more user-friendly for a user can be generated. The program object can comprise, for example, a Java Bean. In one embodiment, the program object comprises a Java Bean that is implemented as part of a J2EE CA Resource Adapter, and the deployment data is stored in a deployment description file for the Resource Adapter, ra.xml. As used herein, unless otherwise noted, the term “set” means one or more (i.e., at least one) and the phrase “any solution” means any now known or later developed solution.
Turning to the drawings,
Computing device 14 is shown including a processor 20, a memory 22A, an input/output (I/O) interface 24, and a bus 26. Further, computing device 14 is shown in communication with an external I/O device/resource 28 and a storage system 22B. As is known in the art, in general, processor 20 executes computer program code, such as tooling framework 30, which is stored in memory 22A and/or storage system 22B. While executing computer program code, processor 20 can read and/or write data, such as program object 50, to/from memory 22A, storage system 22B, and/or I/O interface 24. Bus 26 provides a communications link between each of the components in computing device 14. I/O device 28 can comprise any device that enables an individual to interact with computing device 14 or any device that enables computing device 14 to communicate with one or more other computing devices using any type of communications link.
In any event, computing device 14 can comprise any general purpose computing article of manufacture capable of executing computer program code installed thereon (e.g., a personal computer, server, handheld device, etc.). However, it is understood that computing device 14 and tooling framework 30 are only representative of various possible equivalent computing devices that may perform the process described herein. To this extent, in other embodiments, the functionality provided by computing device 14 and tooling framework 30 can be implemented by a computing article of manufacture that includes any combination of general and/or specific purpose hardware and/or computer program code. In each embodiment, the program code and hardware can be created using standard programming and engineering techniques, respectively.
Similarly, computer infrastructure 12 is only illustrative of various types of computer infrastructures for implementing the invention. For example, in one embodiment, computer infrastructure 12 comprises two or more computing devices (e.g., a server cluster) that communicate over any type of communications link, such as a network, a shared memory, or the like, to perform the process described herein. Further, while performing the process described herein, one or more computing devices in computer infrastructure 12 can communicate with one or more other computing devices external to computer infrastructure 12 using any type of communications link. In either case, the communications link can comprise any combination of various types of wired and/or wireless links; comprise any combination of one or more types of networks (e.g., the Internet, a wide area network, a local area network, a virtual private network, etc.); and/or utilize any combination of various types of transmission techniques and protocols.
As discussed herein, tooling framework 30 enables computer infrastructure 12 to manage a set of program objects 50. To this extent, tooling framework 30 is shown including an object component 32, a discovery component 34, an interface component 36, and an enhancement component 38. Operation of each of these components is discussed further herein. However, it is understood that some of the various systems/components shown in
Regardless, the invention provides a solution for managing a set of program objects, in which an improved user interface for displaying one or more properties of a program object 50 and their corresponding value(s) and/or enabling user 16 to select a value for one or more of the properties is generated. In general, object component 32 can manage a set of program objects 50 and corresponding deployment data 52. Each program object 50 can comprise any type of program object. For example, program object 50 can comprise a Java Bean, an applet (e.g., a Java applet), an object file, an executable, and/or the like.
Optionally, object component 32 also can manage deployment data 52 for the set of program objects 50. Deployment data 52 can include various information about the set of program objects 50. For example, deployment data 52 can comprise information about an interface, such as an application program interface (API), for one or more program object(s) 50, an implementing Java class for the interface, and/or the like. Further, deployment data 52 can include information about one or more configurable properties for program object(s) 50, e.g., specified in a name/type/value tuple. Deployment data 52 can be stored and accessed using any solution. For example, deployment data 52 can comprise one or more records in a database, one or more files, each of which comprises data stored in any data storage format, and/or the like. In one embodiment, deployment data 52 comprises a file that includes data stored using an extensible markup language (XML) file format.
Discovery component 34 obtains a set of properties and/or their corresponding values for a particular program object 50. To this extent, discovery component 34 can analyze deployment data 52 and/or program object 50 using any solution. In the latter case, when program object 50 comprises a Java Bean, discovery component 34 can introspect program object 50 by using an Introspector class as defined by the Java Bean specification, which can obtain explicit and implicit information on program object 50. Further, when program object 50 is implemented as part of a J2EE CA Resource Adapter, discovery component 34 can obtain deployment data 52 that is stored in a deployment description file (e.g., ra.xml).
Interface component 36 generates a user interface for the set of properties for program object 50. For example,
Returning to
In general, enhancement component 38 enables one or more users 16 to view, modify, delete, and/or the like, one or more program objects 50 and/or linking data 56 using any solution. To this extent, enhancement component 38 can generate a user interface for display to user 16, which renders some or all of a program object 50 and/or linking data 56. In this case, the user interface can enable user 16 to request any function (e.g., modify, delete, and/or the like) to be implemented on the displayed data. Further, enhancement component 38 can define an application program interface (API) or the like that enables user 16, another system in this case, to request any function to be implemented on a program object 50 and/or linking data 56.
In any event,
As discussed herein, object component 32 manages the set of Java Beans 50 and ra.xml 52. Further, enhancement component 38 manages a set of property Java objects 54 and corresponding set of linking entries 56. Each linking entry 56 comprises linking data for linking a property Java object 54 with a corresponding Java Bean 50 and/or vice versa. To this extent, each linking entry 56 is shown stored in a static configuration table 62 for tooling framework 30 (
Interface component 36 can generate user interface 42 based on the set of properties 58 and the property Java object 54 that corresponds to Java Bean 50. Interface component 36 can obtain property Java object 54 by obtaining a linking entry 56 in configuration table 62 that corresponds to Java Bean 50 and identifying the corresponding property Java object 54 based on linking entry 56. To this extent, linking entry 56 can uniquely identify both Java Bean 50 and property Java object 54 (e.g., based on the corresponding implementing Java class for each object), thereby defining a mapping between the two objects.
In order to match a property 58 with a corresponding entry in property Java object 54, property Java object 54 can include sufficient data to map each entry with its corresponding property 58. For example, each entry in property Java object 54 can include annotation data that includes the name of the corresponding property 58 (e.g., a “property name” attribute) and/or any additional information that may be needed to correctly map the entry to the correct property 58. It is understood that while each entry in property Java object 54 will have a corresponding unique property 58 from Java Bean 50, each property 58 will not necessarily have a corresponding entry in property Java object 54.
In any event, property Java object 54 can define a set of user interface attributes for Java Bean 50, one or more of which interface component 36 can use to generate user interface 42. For example, property Java object 54 can define a display name for one or more properties 58. The display name can comprise a name that is more meaningful and/or more user-friendly for a user 16 to view, read, and/or understand. Additionally, property Java object 54 can define a property group that includes a set of related properties 58 and can have a property group name. This enables interface component 36 to group the properties 58 in user interface 42. For example, interface component 36 can display the properties 58 of each property group in an area that is visually separated from other properties/property groups by a line, a box, a header (e.g., the property group name) and/or the like. Similarly, property Java object 54 can define a relative priority of each property 58 and/or property group. In this case, interface component 36 can render each property 58 and/or property group in an order from, for example, a highest priority to a lowest priority for user 16 (
To further illustrate these concepts, the following illustrative example of a property Java object 54 is included:
Frequently, the set of properties 58 will include one or more configurable properties for which user 16 (
Returning to
While shown and described herein as a method and system for managing a set of program objects, it is understood that the invention further provides various alternative embodiments. For example, in one embodiment, the invention provides a program product stored on a computer-readable medium, which when executed, enables a computer infrastructure to manage the set of program objects. To this extent, the computer-readable medium includes program code, such as tooling framework 30 (
In another embodiment, the invention provides a method of generating a system for managing a set of program objects. In this case, a computer infrastructure, such as computer infrastructure 12 (
In still another embodiment, the invention provides a method that performs the process described herein on a subscription, advertising, and/or fee basis. That is, a service provider, such as an Application Service Provider, could offer to manage a set of program objects as described herein. In this case, the service provider can manage (e.g., create, maintain, support, etc.) a computer infrastructure, such as computer infrastructure 12 (
As used herein, it is understood that the terms “program code” and “computer program code” are synonymous and mean any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions that cause a computing device having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after any combination of the following: (a) conversion to another language, code or notation; (b) reproduction in a different material form; and/or (c) decompression. To this extent, program code can be embodied as one or more types of program products, such as an application/software program, component software/a library of functions, an operating system, a basic I/O system/driver for a particular computing and/or I/O device, and the like. Further, it is understood that the terms “component” and “system” are synonymous as used herein and represent any combination of hardware and/or software capable of performing some function(s).
The foregoing description of various aspects of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and obviously, many modifications and variations are possible. Such modifications and variations that may be apparent to an individual in the art are included within the scope of the invention as defined by the accompanying claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5228123 | Heckel | Jul 1993 | A |
5467472 | Williams et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5507030 | Sites | Apr 1996 | A |
5625823 | Debenedictis et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5642511 | Chow et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642513 | Schnellinger et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5786815 | Ford | Jul 1998 | A |
5822520 | Parker | Oct 1998 | A |
5825877 | Dan et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5870088 | Washington et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872974 | Mezick | Feb 1999 | A |
5897642 | Capossela et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5929851 | Donnelly | Jul 1999 | A |
5950001 | Hamilton et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5991534 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006242 | Poole et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6044217 | Brealey et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6049805 | Drucker et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059838 | Fraley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6100885 | Donnelly et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6208336 | Carter | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6237135 | Timbol | May 2001 | B1 |
6286134 | Click, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6523170 | Cuomo et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6609123 | Cazemier et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609128 | Underwood | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6629002 | Holder | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6697967 | Robertson | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6721777 | Sharma | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6784883 | Allor | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6807632 | Carpentier et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816882 | Conner et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6928640 | Schlussman | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6941515 | Wilkins | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6961932 | Mishra et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7003560 | Mullen et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7127641 | Anderson | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7152090 | Amirisetty et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7216299 | Knight | May 2007 | B2 |
7278136 | Moritz et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7376939 | Nayak et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7421686 | Souloglou et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7434211 | Wynn et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7454492 | Bauer et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7467375 | Tondreau et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7519956 | Fukuda et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7533246 | Taylor | May 2009 | B2 |
7581212 | West et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
20020035488 | Aquila et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020184401 | Kadel et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030069969 | Renaud | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084425 | Glaser | May 2003 | A1 |
20030112275 | Proulx et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040078495 | Mousseau et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040133627 | Kalyanaraman et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162724 | Hill et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040215655 | Rangadass | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050044110 | Herzenberg et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050114834 | Richards et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050138646 | Mese et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060195413 | Davis et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195777 | Davis et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060236254 | Mateescu et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070038610 | Omoigui | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050366 | Bugir et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070050419 | Weyl et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070150387 | Seubert et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9960478 | Nov 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
MicroSoft Windows XP Explorer (Screen dumps, 2001; pp. 3). |
Chamberland et al.; IBM VisualAge for Java; © 1998; IBM; 23 pages. |
Baker, S., “The Making of Orbix and the Portal Suite,” ICSE2000, Limerick, Ireland, pp. 609-616. |
Chiang, C., “Development of Reusable Components through the Use of Adapters,” Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003, pp. 1-10. |
Lunt, P., “Join the Pieces to Build Processes,” Jun. 2003, http://www.transformmag.com/db—area/archs/2003/06/tfm0306tr—1.shtml, pp. 1-4. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/399,232, Notice of Allowance and Fees Due, filed Dec. 28, 2009, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/399,232, Office Action, filed Jul. 23, 2009, 15 pages. |
Psaila, “Virtual DOM: an Efficient Virtual Memory Representation for Large XML Documents”, 19th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Application, 2008, IEEE, pp. 233-237. |
Al-Ekram et al., “An XML-based Framework for Language Neutral Program Representation and Generic Analysis”, Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC '04), 2004 IEEE, 2 pgs. |
Van Engelen, “Code Generation Techniques for Developing Light-Weight XML Web Services for Embedded Devices”, 2004 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Mar. 14-17, 2004, pp. 854-861. |
Corwin et al., “MJ: A Rational Module System for Java and its Applications”, OOPSLA '03, Oct. 26-30, 2003, pp. 241-254. |
Hentrich et al., “Patterns for Business Object Model Integration in Process-Driven and Service-Oriented Architectures”, PLoP '06, Oct. 21-23, 2006, 14 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/907,363, Office Action, filed Jun. 1, 2007, 21 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/907,363, Office Action, filed Oct. 30, 2007, 25 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/907,363, Office Action, Apr. 7, 2008 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/907,363, Office Action, filed Sep. 30, 2008, 17 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/907,363, Office Action, filed Mar. 3, 2009 16 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/907,363, Examiner's Answer, filed Aug. 28, 2011, 12 pages. |
Bernstein et al., “The Microsoft Repository”, Proceedings of the 23rd VLDB Conference, Atens, Greece, 1997, 10 pgs. |
Mueller et al., Penumbra: an Eclipse plugin for introductory programming. In Procedings of the 2003 OOPSLA Workshop on Eclipse Technology Exchange (Anaheim. California, Oct. 27, 2003, 65-68. |
Berliner, CVS II: Parelleizing Software Development, White paper, Prisma, Inc., Colorado Springs, CO, 1990. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/907,423, Office Action, filed Mar. 26, 2009, 18 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/907,423, Office Action, filed Oct. 30, 2009, 13 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/907,423, Office Action, filed Jul. 7, 2010, 9 pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/907,423, Office Action, filed Feb. 28, 2011, 12 pgs. |
Dulman, L. “Visual Ada developer”, 2002, ACM pp. 30-34. |
Green, T. “Verdantium Towards A Java-Enabled Compound Document Model”, 2000, ACM, pp. 77-78. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,875, Office Action, filed Mar. 17, 2008, 31 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,875, Office Action, filed Oct. 21, 2008, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,875, Office Action, filed Apr. 2, 2009, 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,875, Office Action, filed Nov. 25, 2009, 19 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,875, Examiner's Answer, filed Jul. 12, 2010, 22 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/398,875, Notice of Allowance and Fees Due, filed Dec. 16, 2013, 11 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070245252 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |