This disclosure relates to hydrocarbon production from subterranean formations.
Primary hydrocarbon recovery involves the extraction of hydrocarbons from a subterranean formation either by the natural pressure within the subterranean formation or facilitation by an artificial lift device, such as an electric submersible pump. Secondary hydrocarbon recovery involves injection of fluid into a subterranean formation to displace hydrocarbons and produce them to the surface. Enhanced oil recovery involves altering a property of the hydrocarbons and/or the subterranean formation to make the hydrocarbons more conducive to extraction.
Certain aspects of the subject matter described can be implemented as a method. The method includes alternating between (a) applying an electric current to a subterranean formation and (b) flowing an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) treatment fluid into a wellbore formed in the subterranean formation. After alternating between applying the electric current and flowing the EOR treatment fluid, an aqueous salt solution is flowed into the wellbore to mobilize hydrocarbons within the subterranean formation.
This, and other aspects, can include one or more of the following features.
In some implementations, the method includes repeating and alternating between (a) and (b) at least 3 times and up to 12 times for a time duration of up to 3 years.
In some implementations, the electric current is applied to the subterranean formation for a time period of at least 1 week in each iteration.
In some implementations, the EOR treatment fluid is flowed into the wellbore for a time period of at least 3 months in each iteration.
In some implementations, a first iteration of flowing the EOR treatment fluid into the wellbore occurs after a first iteration of applying the electric current to the subterranean formation. In some implementations, a first iteration of applying the electric current to the subterranean formation occurs after a first iteration of flowing the EOR treatment fluid into the wellbore.
In some implementations, the EOR treatment fluid is continuously flowed into the wellbore for each iteration of flowing the EOR treatment fluid into the wellbore.
In some implementations, a voltage of the electric current is the same for each iteration of applying the electric current to the subterranean formation.
In some implementations, a voltage of the electric current decreases for each subsequent iteration of applying the electric current to the subterranean formation.
In some implementations, a voltage of the electric current increases for each subsequent iteration of applying the electric current to the subterranean formation.
In some implementations, the wellbore is a first wellbore. In some implementations, flowing the aqueous salt solution in the first wellbore mobilizes hydrocarbons toward a second wellbore formed in the subterranean formation. In some implementations, the method includes producing the hydrocarbons from the subterranean formation to a surface location from the second wellbore.
Certain aspects of the subject matter described can be implemented as a method. An electric current is applied to a subterranean formation for a time period in a range of from 1 week to 8 weeks. After applying the electric current to the subterranean formation, an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) treatment fluid is flowed into a first wellbore formed in the subterranean formation for a time period in a range of from 2 years to 3 years to improve mobility of hydrocarbons in the subterranean formation. After flowing the EOR treatment fluid into the subterranean formation, an aqueous salt solution is flowed into the first wellbore to mobilize hydrocarbons in the subterranean formation toward a second wellbore formed in the subterranean formation. Hydrocarbons are produced from the subterranean formation to a surface location from the second wellbore.
This, and other aspects, can include one or more of the following features.
In some implementations, the EOR treatment fluid includes magnetic particles.
In some implementations, the method includes applying an electric current to the subterranean formation while flowing the EOR treatment fluid into the first wellbore. In some implementations, the magnetic particles of the EOR treatment fluid propagate the electric current applied to the subterranean formation.
In some implementations, applying the electric current to the subterranean formation includes generating the electric current within the subterranean formation using an anode positioned within the first wellbore and a cathode positioned within the second wellbore.
In some implementations, applying the electric current to the subterranean formation includes generating the electric current using an anode positioned at a surface location and a cathode positioned within the second wellbore.
The details of one or more implementations of the subject matter of this disclosure are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the subject matter will become apparent from the description, the drawings, and the claims.
A well is treated to improve hydrocarbon production from a subterranean formation. The treatment includes repeating and alternating between applying an electric current to the subterranean formation and injecting a treatment fluid into the subterranean formation. This portion of the treatment can improve the mobility of the hydrocarbons within the subterranean formation. After alternating between these steps, the treatment includes a waterflooding step to mobilize the hydrocarbons in the subterranean formation and subsequently produce them to the surface.
The subject matter described in this disclosure can be implemented in particular implementations, so as to realize one or more of the following advantages. The alternation between the application of electric current and injection of treatment fluid improves hydrocarbon mobility within subterranean formations, which allows for increased hydrocarbon production. The repeating and alternation of the application of electric current and injection of treatment fluid exhibit synergistic effects that improve hydrocarbon production from a subterranean formation in comparison to the sum of implementing the steps individually.
In some implementations, as shown in
The wellhead defines an attachment point for other equipment to be attached to the wells 100A and 100B. For example,
In particular, casing 112 is commercially produced in a number of common sizes specified by the American Petroleum Institute (the “API”), including 4½, 5, 5½, 6, 6⅝, 7, 7⅝, 7¾, 8⅝, 8¾, 9⅝, 9¾, 9⅞, 10¾, 11¾, 11⅞, 13⅜, 13½, 13⅝, 16, 18⅝, and 20 inches, and the API specifies internal diameters for each casing size.
The electric current can be applied to the subterranean formation at sub-step 202a, for example, by using a pair of electrodes. For example, a pair of electrodes generates the electric current that is applied to the subterranean formation at sub-step 202a. In some implementations, a cathode is positioned at the surface 106, and an anode is positioned within the wellbore. In some implementations, an anode is positioned at the surface 106, and a cathode is positioned within the wellbore. In some implementations, a cathode and an anode are positioned within the wellbore. In some implementations, an anode is positioned within the wellbore that is part of the injection well, and a cathode is positioned in a different wellbore that is part of a production well. In some implementations, an anode is positioned at the surface 106, and a cathode is positioned in a wellbore that is part of a production well.
In some implementations, at each iteration of sub-step 202a, the electric current is applied to the subterranean formation for a time period of at least 1 week. Applying the electric current to the subterranean formation can result in increasing a temperature of fluid within the subterranean formation. Applying the electric current to the subterranean formation can result in decreasing a viscosity of fluid within the subterranean formation. Each of these effects can improve hydrocarbon mobility within the subterranean formation. In some implementations, at each iteration of sub-step 202a, the electric current is applied to the subterranean formation for a time period of up to 8 weeks. In some implementations, at each iteration of sub-step 202a, the electric current is applied to the subterranean formation for a time period of up to 4 weeks. In some implementations, at each iteration of sub-step 202a, the electric current is applied to the subterranean formation for a time period of at least 1 week and up to 8 weeks. In some implementations, at each iteration of sub-step 202a, the electric current is applied to the subterranean formation for a time period of at least 1 week and up to 4 weeks. In some implementations, the time period for each iteration of sub-step 202a is the same. For example, the time period for each iteration of sub-step 202a is 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks, 6 weeks, 7 weeks, or 8 weeks. In some implementations, the time period of some iterations of sub-step 202a is the same but different from those of the remaining iterations of sub-step 202a. In some implementations, the time period for each iteration of sub-step 202a is different. In some implementations, each subsequent iteration of sub-step 202a is performed for a time period that is shorter in comparison to the iteration of sub-step 202a that preceded it. For example, the time period of each iteration of sub-step 202a gradually decreases starting from a time period of 8 weeks to a time period of 1 week. In some implementations, each subsequent iteration of sub-step 202a is performed for a time period that is longer in comparison to the iteration of sub-step 202a that preceded it. For example, the time period of each iteration of sub-step 202a gradually increases starting from a time period of 1 week to a time period of 8 weeks. In some implementations, each iteration of sub-step 202a alternates between two different time periods. For example, each iteration of sub-step 202a alternates between being performed for 1 week and being performed for 8 weeks.
In some cases, applying the electric current to the subterranean formation for less than 1 week for a single iteration of sub-step 202a may not sufficiently improve mobility of hydrocarbons within the subterranean formation. In some cases, applying the electric current to the subterranean formation for longer than 8 weeks may consume excess energy without yielding an appreciable increase in hydrocarbon mobility within the subterranean formation. The length of the time period for each iteration of sub-step 202a can depend on various factors, such as viscosity of hydrocarbon fluid within the subterranean formation and distance between the electrodes. For example, the time period of each iteration of sub-step 202a may be longer for hydrocarbons with increased viscosity. For example, the time period of each iteration of sub-step 202a may be longer for electrodes that are positioned farther apart from each other.
In some implementations, the voltage of the electric current that is applied to the subterranean formation is the same for each iteration of sub-step 202a. In some implementations, the voltage of the electric current that is applied to the subterranean formation is the same for some iterations of sub-step 202a but different for other iterations of sub-step 202a. In some implementations, the voltage of the electric current that is applied to the subterranean formation is different for each iteration of sub-step 202a. In some implementations, for each subsequent iteration of sub-step 202a, the voltage of the electric current that is applied to the subterranean formation decreases. For example, for subterranean formations that have high viscosity hydrocarbons, starting with a high voltage (such as 100 V to 400 V with a current of up to 2,000 amperes) can initiate hydrocarbon mobilization and then a gradual decrease in voltage may be sufficient in maintaining hydrocarbon mobilization. In some implementations, for each subsequent iteration of sub-step 202a, the voltage of the electric current that is applied to the subterranean formation increases. For example, for subterranean formations that have low or medium viscosity hydrocarbons, starting with a low voltage (such as 50 V to 150 V with a current of up to 500 amperes) may be sufficient to initiate hydrocarbon mobilization and then a gradual increase in voltage can improve connectivity of hydrocarbon deposits, for example, to form an oil bank. For example, high viscosity hydrocarbons can be considered to be hydrocarbons with an American Petroleum Institute (API) gravity of less than 30 and viscosities in a range of from about 10 centipoise (cP) to about 100 cP. For example, low viscosity hydrocarbons can be considered to be hydrocarbons with an API gravity of at least 30 and viscosities in a range of from about 2 cP to about 10 cP.
At sub-step 202b, an enhanced oil recovery (EOR) treatment fluid is flowed into the wellbore. The EOR treatment fluid is a fluid that alters the original properties of the hydrocarbons trapped in the subterranean formation or the subterranean formation itself, such that additional extraction of the hydrocarbons from the subterranean formation is possible. The EOR treatment fluid is a fluid that improves mobility of hydrocarbons within the subterranean formation. For example, the EOR treatment fluid can alter the subterranean formation, such that the subterranean formation becomes more water-wetting, so that oil can be displaced more easily. The EOR treatment fluid not only restores pressure within the subterranean formation, but also improves oil displacement and/or fluid flow in the subterranean formation. For example, the EOR treatment fluid can reduce oil/water interfacial tension and alter the wettability of a rock surface toward water-wetting (away from oil-wetting). For example, the EOR treatment fluid can cause oil swelling, thereby reducing viscosity (and in turn, increasing mobility) of hydrocarbons in the subterranean formation. Applying the electric current to the subterranean formation at sub-step 202a can improve the rheology of hydrocarbons within the subterranean formation (for example, reduce viscosity), thereby reducing the requirements of the EOR treatment fluid. For example, the EOR treatment fluid can include a decreased concentration of polymer due to implementation of sub-step 202a. The EOR treatment fluid can be flowed into the wellbore at sub-step 202b, for example, using a pump. The pump can be located at the surface 106 or positioned within the wellbore.
In some implementations, the EOR treatment fluid is an aqueous fluid that includes an additive. Some examples of suitable additives include salt, friction reducer, polymer, non-magnetic particulate, magnetic particulate, surfactant, dissolved carbon dioxide, nanoparticles, and biocide. In some implementations, the EOR treatment fluid includes a smart water with a tailored salt water chemistry composition. For example, the EOR treatment fluid can be an aqueous fluid with a total dissolved solids (TDS) level in a range of from about 5,000 parts per million (ppm) to about 7,000 ppm, comprising about 400 ppm to about 1,000 ppm sulfate ions and about 300 ppm to about 600 ppm calcium and/or magnesium ions. In some implementations, the EOR treatment fluid includes an additive that is affected by the electric current applied at sub-step 202a. For example, the EOR treatment fluid can include magnetic particles that extend the reach of the electric current applied at sub-step 202a.
In some implementations, at each iteration of sub-step 202b, the EOR treatment fluid is flowed into the wellbore for a time period of at least 3 months. In some implementations, at each iteration of sub-step 202b, the EOR treatment fluid is flowed into the wellbore for a time period of up to 6 months. In some implementations, at each iteration of sub-step 202b, the EOR treatment fluid is flowed into the wellbore for a time period of at least 3 months and up to 6 months. In some implementations, the time period for each iteration of sub-step 202b is the same. For example, the time period for each iteration of sub-step 202b is 3 months, 3.5 months, 4 months, 4.5 months, 5 months, 5.5 months, or 6 months. In some implementations, the time period of some iterations of sub-step 202b is the same but different from those of the remaining iterations of sub-step 202b. In some implementations, the time period for each iteration of sub-step 202b is different. In some implementations, each subsequent iteration of sub-step 202b is performed for a time period that is shorter in comparison to the iteration of sub-step 202b that preceded it. For example, the time period of each iteration of sub-step 202b gradually decreases starting from a time period of 6 months to a time period of 3 months. In some implementations, each subsequent iteration of sub-step 202b is performed for a time period that is longer in comparison to the iteration of sub-step 202b that preceded it. For example, the time period of each iteration of sub-step 202b gradually increases starting from a time period of 3 months to a time period of 6 months. In some implementations, each iteration of sub-step 202b alternates between two different time periods. For example, each iteration of sub-step 202b alternates between being performed for 3 months and being performed for 6 months.
In some cases, flowing the EOR treatment fluid into the wellbore for less than 3 months for a single iteration of sub-step 202b may not provide sufficient volume of EOR treatment fluid to adequately react with the subterranean formation and downhole fluids, such that a favorable interaction occurs both at the oil/brine interface and the rock/brine interfaces to cause interfacial tension reduction, wettability alteration toward water-wetting, and initiate beneficial effects for mobilizing hydrocarbons within the subterranean formation. In some cases, flowing the EOR treatment fluid into the wellbore for longer than 6 months for a single iteration of sub-step 202b may provide unnecessarily excess volume of EOR treatment fluid which can potentially adversely impact economics of hydrocarbon production.
In some implementations, at each iteration of sub-step 202b, the EOR treatment fluid is continuously flowed into the wellbore. In some implementations, at each iteration of sub-step 202b, the EOR treatment fluid is flowed into the wellbore in pulses. In some implementations, the EOR treatment fluid is continuously flowed into the wellbore for some iterations of sub-step 202b, while the EOR treatment fluid is flowed into the wellbore in pulses for other iterations of sub-step 202b. The manner in which the EOR treatment fluid is flowed into the wellbore at any of the iterations of sub-step 202b can be determined based on various factors, such as wellbore condition, composition of downhole fluid, composition of the EOR treatment fluid, and type of source rock present in the subterranean formation. In some cases, continuously flowing the EOR treatment fluid into the wellbore at sub-step 202b can maintain pressure in the subterranean formation more effectively in comparison to flowing the EOR treatment fluid into the wellbore in pulses. In some cases, flowing the EOR treatment fluid into the wellbore in pulses can remove accumulated particulates near the wellbore or mitigate wellbore blockages more effectively in comparison to continuously flowing the EOR treatment fluid into the wellbore.
In some implementations, step 202 includes repeating and alternating between sub-steps 202a and 202b at least 3 times (that is, 3 iterations of sub-step 202a and 3 iterations of sub-step 202b, alternating). In some implementations, step 202 includes repeating and alternating between sub-steps 202a and 202b up to 12 times (that is, 12 iterations of sub-step 202a and 12 iterations of sub-step 202b, alternating). In some implementations, step 202 includes repeating one more iteration of either sub-step 202a or sub-step 202b, depending on whichever sub-step was performed last, before moving onto step 204. In some implementations, step 202 includes repeating and alternating between sub-steps 202a and 202b for a time duration of at least 2 years. In some implementations, step 202 includes repeating and alternating between sub-steps 202a and 202b for a time duration of up to 3 years. In some implementations, step 202 includes repeating and alternating between sub-steps 202a and 202b for a time duration in a range of from 2 years to 3 years. The total time duration of 2 years to 3 years for step 202 can be considered sufficient for injecting 0.3 to 0.5 pore volumes of EOR treatment fluid into the subterranean formation. In some implementations, step 202 includes repeating and alternating between sub-steps 202a and 202b until 0.3 to 0.5 pore volumes of EOR treatment fluid are injected into the subterranean formation.
Although written as sub-steps 202a and 202b, sub-step 202a need not occur before sub-step 202b. In some implementations, the first iteration of sub-step 202a (electric current application) occurs after the first iteration of sub-step 202b (EOR treatment fluid injection). In some implementations, the first iteration of sub-step 202b occurs after the first iteration of sub-step 202a.
At step 204, an aqueous salt solution is flowed into the wellbore to mobilize hydrocarbons within the subterranean formation. The aqueous salt solution at step 204 serves as a flooding medium. A second wellbore (for example, another implementation of the well 100B of
The salt content of the aqueous salt solution flowed into the wellbore at step 204 can depend on various factors, such as salinity of formation water of the subterranean formation, wettability of a target zone of the subterranean formation, and type of source rock present in the subterranean formation. In some implementations, the aqueous salt solution has a total dissolved solids (TDS) level of at least 20,000 parts per million (ppm). In some implementations, the aqueous salt solution has a TDS level of at least 30,000 ppm. In some implementations, the aqueous salt solution has a TDS level of up to 60,000 ppm. In some implementations, the aqueous salt solution has a TDS level in a range of from 30,000 ppm to 60,000 ppm. In some implementations, the aqueous salt solution includes seawater.
After applying the electric current to the subterranean formation at step 252, an EOR treatment fluid is flowed into the first wellbore formed in the subterranean formation for a time period in a range of from 2 years to 3 years at step 254. Flowing the EOR treatment into the first wellbore at step 254 improves mobility of hydrocarbons in the subterranean formation. As described previously, in some implementations, the EOR treatment fluid includes magnetic particles. In some implementations, the method 250 includes applying an electric current (either the same as or different from the electric current applied at step 252) to the subterranean formation while flowing the EOR treatment fluid into the first wellbore at step 254. In such implementations, the magnetic particles of the EOR treatment can propagate the electric current applied to the subterranean formation.
After flowing the EOR treatment fluid into the first wellbore at step 254, an aqueous salt solution is flowed into the first wellbore at step 256. Flowing the aqueous salt solution into the first wellbore at step 256 mobilizes the hydrocarbons in the subterranean formation toward the second wellbore formed in the subterranean formation.
At step 258, the hydrocarbons are produced from the subterranean formation to a surface location (for example, the surface 106) from the second wellbore.
While this specification contains many specific implementation details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular implementations. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate implementations can also be implemented, in combination, in a single implementation. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single implementation can also be implemented in multiple implementations, separately, or in any sub-combination. Moreover, although previously described features may be described as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can, in some cases, be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or variation of a sub-combination.
As used in this disclosure, the terms “a,” “an,” or “the” are used to include one or more than one unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. The term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive “or” unless otherwise indicated. The statement “at least one of A and B” has the same meaning as “A, B, or A and B.” In addition, it is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed in this disclosure, and not otherwise defined, is for the purpose of description only and not of limitation. Any use of section headings is intended to aid reading of the document and is not to be interpreted as limiting; information that is relevant to a section heading may occur within or outside of that particular section.
As used in this disclosure, the term “about” or “approximately” can allow for a degree of variability in a value or range, for example, within 10%, within 5%, or within 1% of a stated value or of a stated limit of a range.
As used in this disclosure, the term “substantially” refers to a majority of, or mostly, as in at least about 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 99.5%, 99.9%, 99.99%, or at least about 99.999% or more.
Values expressed in a range format should be interpreted in a flexible manner to include not only the numerical values explicitly recited as the limits of the range, but also to include all the individual numerical values or sub-ranges encompassed within that range as if each numerical value and sub-range is explicitly recited. For example, a range of “0.1% to about 5%” or “0.1% to 5%” should be interpreted to include about 0.1% to about 5%, as well as the individual values (for example, 1%, 2%, 3%, and 4%) and the sub-ranges (for example, 0.1% to 0.5%, 1.1% to 2.2%, 3.3% to 4.4%) within the indicated range. The statement “X to Y” has the same meaning as “about X to about Y,” unless indicated otherwise. Likewise, the statement “X, Y, or Z” has the same meaning as “about X, about Y, or about Z,” unless indicated otherwise.
Particular implementations of the subject matter have been described. Other implementations, alterations, and permutations of the described implementations are within the scope of the following claims as will be apparent to those skilled in the art. While operations are depicted in the drawings or claims in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed (some operations may be considered optional), to achieve desirable results. In certain circumstances, multitasking or parallel processing (or a combination of multitasking and parallel processing) may be advantageous and performed as deemed appropriate.
Moreover, the separation or integration of various system modules and components in the previously described implementations should not be understood as requiring such separation or integration in all implementations, and it should be understood that the described components and systems can generally be integrated together or packaged into multiple products.
Accordingly, the previously described example implementations do not define or constrain the present disclosure. Other changes, substitutions, and alterations are also possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1784214 | Workman | Dec 1930 | A |
2795279 | Sarapuu | Jun 1957 | A |
2799641 | Thomas | Jul 1957 | A |
3137347 | Parker | Jun 1964 | A |
3417823 | Faris | Dec 1968 | A |
3428125 | Parker | Feb 1969 | A |
3469630 | Hurd et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3507330 | Gill | Apr 1970 | A |
3542066 | Cordova | Nov 1970 | A |
3605888 | Crowson et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3724543 | Bell et al. | Apr 1973 | A |
3782465 | Bell | Jan 1974 | A |
3848671 | Kern | Nov 1974 | A |
3946809 | Hagedorn | Mar 1976 | A |
3958636 | Perkins | May 1976 | A |
4010799 | Kern | Mar 1977 | A |
4206024 | Carpenter | Jun 1980 | A |
4228853 | Harvey | Oct 1980 | A |
4296812 | Kalfoglou | Oct 1981 | A |
4313500 | Johnson, Jr. et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4382469 | Bell | May 1983 | A |
4466484 | Kermabon | Aug 1984 | A |
4473114 | Bell | Sep 1984 | A |
4495990 | Titus | Jan 1985 | A |
4499948 | Perkins | Feb 1985 | A |
4620592 | Perkins | Nov 1986 | A |
4640353 | Schuh | Feb 1987 | A |
4643256 | Dilgren et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4982789 | Prukop | Jan 1991 | A |
4997044 | Stack | Mar 1991 | A |
5042297 | Lessi | Aug 1991 | A |
5109922 | Joseph | May 1992 | A |
5517024 | Mullins et al. | May 1996 | A |
5868030 | Burmley et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6814141 | Huh et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6877556 | Wittie | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6942043 | Kurkoski | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7077199 | Vinegar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7121342 | Vinegar et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7325604 | Wittie | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7352179 | Chen et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7853045 | Touati et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7866383 | Dusterhoft et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7980301 | Kostrov et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8684076 | Kostrov et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8776880 | Pich et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8950495 | Barbour et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8985206 | Morvan et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9133709 | Huh et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9212542 | Fripp et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9284480 | Han et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9328597 | Morys | May 2016 | B2 |
9394769 | Nenniger et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9745833 | Carvajal | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9969928 | He et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10000687 | Al-Yousef et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10041339 | Jerauld | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10107056 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10184904 | Gong et al. | Jan 2019 | B1 |
10196886 | Tolman et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10287486 | Ayirala et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10563492 | Stokholm | Feb 2020 | B2 |
20020035040 | Talashek et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030102123 | Wittie | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050199387 | Wittie | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20090110242 | Touati et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100044047 | Kabishcher et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110306525 | Lightheim | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120116443 | Ferrera et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120125604 | Willingham et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120256634 | Morys | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130081459 | Merniche | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130274149 | Lafitte et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130277046 | Haroun et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140039793 | Querales | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140338903 | Mahmoud et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140345862 | Jerauld | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20160009981 | Teklu et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160061003 | Gottumukkala et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170241226 | Fathi | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180011211 | Leonard | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180030816 | Devalve et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180230787 | Stokholm | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180253514 | Bryant et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180291717 | Ayirala et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180328152 | Hart et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180347326 | Shammari et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190169969 | Al-Mulhem | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190194524 | Ayirala et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2596208 | May 2013 | EP |
WO 2009076006 | Jun 2009 | WO |
WO 2014160626 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO-2016048158 | Mar 2016 | WO |
WO 2016205158 | Dec 2016 | WO |
WO 2017060748 | Apr 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abukhamsin et al., “Inflow profiling and production optimization in smart wells using distributed acoustic and temperature measurements,” A dissertation submitted to the Department of Energy Resources Engineering the Committee on Graduate Studies of Stanford University, Jun. 2017, 190 pages. |
Al-Anazi et al., “Innovative Production Optimization Technique for Smart Well Completions Using Real-Time Nodal Analysis Applications,” SPE-189198-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Symposium: Production Enhancement and Cost Optimisation, Nov. 7-8, 2017, 14 pages. |
Alghamdi et al., “SmartWater Synergy with Surfactant Chemicals: An Electro-Kinetic Study,” SPE-197239-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Nov. 11-14, 2019, 12 pages. |
Alkandari et al., “Technical Advancement of Carbonate Acid Stimulation Injection,” SPE-197982-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Kuwait Oil & Gas Conference and Show, Oct. 13-16, 2019, 22 pages. |
Alves et al., “Influence of the salinity on the interfacial properties of a Brazilian crude oil-brine systems,” Fuel 118: 21-26, Feb. 15, 2014, 6 pages. |
Arabzadeh and Amani, “Application of a Novel Ultrasonic Technology to Improve Oil Recovery with an Environmental Viewpoint,” Journal of Petroleum and Environmental Biotechnology 08:02, Jan. 2017, 6 pages. |
Ayirala et al., “Water ion interactions at crude oil-water interface: A new fundamental understanding of SmartWater flood,” SPE 183894-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference, Mar. 6-9, 2017, 17 pages. |
Brouwer et al., “Recovery Increase through Water Flooding with Smart Well Technology,” SPE 68979, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE European Formation Damage Conference, May 21-22, 2001, 10 pages. |
Bukhamsin et al., “Optimization of multilateral well design and location in a real field using a continuous genetic algorithm,” SPE 136944, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE/DGS Annual Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium and Exhibition, Apr. 4-7, 2010, 16 pages. |
Cetkovic et al., “A methodology for multilateral wells optimization—field case study,” SPE 183004-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Nov. 7-10, 2016, 18 pages. |
Edabi and Davies, “Techniques for Optimum Placement of Interval Control Valve(s) in an Intelligent Well,” SPE 100191, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Austria, Jun. 12-15, 2006, 11 pages. |
Elmsallati and Davies, “Automatic Optimization of Infinite Variable Control Valves,” IPTC-10319, International Petroleum Technology Conferences (IPTC), presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Qatar, Nov. 21-23, 2005, 7 pages. |
Farshi, “Improving Genetic Algorithms for Optimum Well Placement,” Master's Report, Department of Energy Resources Engineering, Stanford University, California, Jun. 2008, 94 pages. |
flow-industries.com (online), “AirShock Enhanced Oil Recovery,” available on or before 2015, retrieved on Nov. 6, 2020, retrieved from URL <https://www.flow-industries.com/oil-and-gas-wells/>, 4 pages. |
Ghosh and King, “Optimization of Smart Well Completion Design in the Presence of Uncertainty,” SPE 166008, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Reservoir Characterization and simulation Conference and Exhibition held in Abu Dhabi, Sep. 16-18, 2013, 17 pages. |
Gilev, “Acoustic Well Stimulation of Near-Wellbore Zone for Enhanced Oil Recovery,” Center of Ultrasound Technology (CUT Service), 2016, 38 pages. |
Glandt, “Reservoir Aspects of Smart Wells,” SPE 81107, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Trinidad, Apr. 27-30, 2003, 11 pages. |
Haupt and Haupt, “Practical Genetic Algorithms,” 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1-253, 2004, 261 pages. |
Holland, “Genetic algorithms,” Scientific American, 66-79, Jul. 1992, 14 pages. |
Jalali et al., “Intelligent Completion System—The Reservoir Rationale,” SPE 50587, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE European Petroleum Conference, Oct. 20-22, 1998, 6 pages. |
Lakatos and Lakatos-Szabo, “Effect of IOR/EOR chemicals on interfacial rheological properties of crude oil/water systems,” SPE 65391, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 2001 SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, Feb. 13-16, 2001, 10 pages. |
Liu et al., “Favorable Attributes of Alkaline-Surfactant-Polymer Flooding,” SPE 99744, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 2006 SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recoveiy, Apr. 22-26, 2006, SPE Journal, Mar. 2008, 12 pages. |
Lorenz et al., “Uniform Inflow Completion System Extended Economic Field Life: A Field Case Study and Technology Overview,” SPE 101895, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Texas, Sep. 24-27, 2006, 9 pages. |
Ma et al., “Adsorption of Cationic and Anionic Surfactants on natural and Synthetic Carbonate Materials,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 408:164-172, 2013, 9 pages. |
Malkin et al., “Chapter 2: Viscoelasticity,” in Rheology: Concepts, Methods, and Applications, 84 pages. |
Mitchell, “An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms,” Chapter 1-4, Chapter 6, Appendix A-B, MIT Press, 1996, 162 pages. |
Mullakaev et al., “Development of Ultrasonic Equipment and Technology for Well Stimulation and Enhanced Oil Recoveiy,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 125:201-208, 2015, 8 pages. |
Naus et al., “Optimization of Commingled Production using Infinitely Variable Inflow Control Valves,” SPE 90959, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Texas, Sep. 26-29, 2004, 12 pages. |
Pak et al., “Multiscale pore-network representation of heterogeneous carbonate rocks,” AGU Publications, Water Resources Research, 52: 5433-5441, 2016, 9 pages. |
Qureshi et al., “The Interpretation of Permeability Changes during Acid Injection in Carbonates: A New Integrated Methodology,” SPE-177609-MS, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Nov. 9-12, 2015, 8 pages. |
Radcliff, “Forma Analysis and Random Respectful Recombination,” EPCC-TR-91-02, proceedings of 4th International Conference and Genetic Algorithms, San Mateo, CA, 1991, 9 pages. |
Rudolph, “Convergence Analysis of Canonic Genetic Algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Special Issue on Evolutionary Computational 5:1, Jan. 1994, 6 pages. |
Sinha et al., “Flow Equilibration Toward Horizontal Well Using Downhole Valves,” SPE 68635, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Indonesia, Apr. 17-19, 2001, 6 pages. |
Tagavifar et al., “Effect of pH on Absorption of Anionic Surfactants on Limestone: Experimental Study and Surface Complexation Modeling,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physiocochemical and Engineering Aspect 538:549-558, Feb. 5, 2018, 10 pages. |
Thomas et al., “Alkali and Hybrid-Alkali Flooding as a Tertiary Oil Recovery Mode: Prospects and Challenges,” International Journal of Petroleum and Petrochemical Engineering (IJPPE), 2:2 (22-31), 2016, 10 pages. |
Wasan et al., “Observations on the coalescence behavior of oil droplets and emulsion stability in enhanced oil recovery,” SPE6846, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) of AIME, Dec. 1978, 9 pages. |
Westermark et al., “Enhanced Oil Recovery with Downhole Vibration Stimulation,” SPE 67303, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the SPE Production and Operations Symposium, Mar. 24-17, 2001, 13 pages. |
Wooden et al., “Seismic Stimulation: An Eco-Friendly, Effective EOR Alternative,” Technology Update, JPT, Aug. 2018, 3 pages. |
Yeten and Jalali, “Effectiveness of Intelligent Completions in a Multiwell Development,” SPE 68077, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 2001 SPE Middle East Oil Show, Bahrain, Mar. 17-20, 2017 pages. |
Yousef et al., “Laboratory Investigation of the Impact of Injection-Water Salinity and Ionic Content on Oil Recovery for Carbonate Reservoirs,” SPE 137634-PA, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering 14:05, Oct. 2011, 5 pages, Abstract only. |
Zhang et al., “Favorable Attributes of Alkali-Surfactant-Polymer Flooding,” SPE 99744, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE), presented at the 2006 SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recoveiy, Apr. 22-26, 2006, 13 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Appln. No. PCT/US2021/047500, dated Dec. 10, 2021, 15 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220065084 A1 | Mar 2022 | US |