Patent Application
20180322547
This invention relates generally to automated computer processing of invoices, payments, and money transfers.
For years companies have been trying to move transactions into an electronic system. Large businesses have the resources and scale to justify the installation of new electronic systems. However, for a large segment of small and medium size enterprises (SMEs), such attempts have not fared well. This is because it is not cost effective for SMEs to install a dedicated system and there is no standardized transaction system to allow the sharing of costs among many different businesses.
In addition, traditional payment methods typically require related parties to know each other's bank accounts. For example, in order for a payor to electronically transfer a payment into a vendor's bank account, the payor must know the vendor's bank account number and ABA routing number. When the vendor receives the payment, it can also find out the payor's bank account number. Thus, entities cannot hide their bank account information when making/receiving payments using the traditional payment methods.
The present invention overcomes the limitations of the prior art by providing enhanced systems and methods for processing invoices, checks, and money transfers.
One aspect of the invention is a computer-implemented method for inviting an entity to open an account at a billing and payment system, the method comprising: issuing a check payable to the entity, wherein a checkbox for opening an account at the billing and payment system is printed on an endorsement section of the check along with a reference to additional information regarding additional information related to the account opening; receiving an image of the endorsement section of the check after the check is cleared; determining whether the checkbox is checked in the image; and responsive to a determination that the checkbox is checked, opening an account for the entity at the billing and payment system.
Other aspects of the invention include computer program product, systems and devices corresponding to the methods described above.
The invention has other advantages and features which will be more readily apparent from the following detailed description of the invention and the appended claims, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The figures depict embodiments of the present invention for purposes of illustration only. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from the following discussion that alternative embodiments of the structures and methods illustrated herein may be employed without departing from the principles of the invention described herein.
One aspect of the invention includes approaches for recognizing an invoice, for example identifying the issuer of the invoice and/or recognizing the layout of the invoice. Invoices can be recognized by comparing them to a database of distinguishing features. For example, invoices might be recognized based on the logo of the issuer, name and/or address of the issuer, or other data or signature features that are unique to an issuer. Once an invoice is recognized, a corresponding template can be applied to extract the relevant data from the recognized invoice.
There are various modes by which an invoice may be entered into the system and various media on which the invoice may be received. For example, the recipient of a paper invoice could fax it to a dedicated fax number for that recipient's account, such as, for example, any of fax numbers 111a-n shown in
Once received, invoices can be recognized using many different types of distinguishing features beside those discussed above. Additional examples include but are not limited to black/white histograms, color histograms, sectional signatures and sectional histograms. OCR (Optical Character Recognition) can also be used as a part of the recognition process. It can be applied to just the header, to the entire invoice or to any part of the invoice. The result of the OCR can be used as the basis for recognizing an invoice. Alternately, OCR can be applied after an invoice has been recognized, in order to extract data from the invoice. Other examples of distinguishing features include metadata (e.g., fax number, issuer e-mail address, subject line, pdf- or Word-metadata, keywords, barcode), number of pages, OFX (Open Financial Exchange) download, and XML (eXtensible Markup Language) fields or tags. Other suitable structured files with a certificate may be used in other cases.
At step 380, the process branches. If no match is found (no branch), the invoice is sent 390 to a work file, in which unprocessed documents are stored. Treatment of the documents in this work file is explained below, in the description of
Data is extracted 350 from the invoice based on the selected template, using OCR and/or other suitable means. In some cases the image may be processed using OCR before it is received 310, for example, by using OCR functions provided by Adobe and other tools by other companies. The information extracted in step 350 is preferably stored 360 in a database that also resides in storage system 103.
In one approach, once a template is identified for an invoice, data may be automatically extracted from the invoice (e.g., as identified by fields in the template). In another approach, invoices may be grouped together based on their similarity. Data extracted from certain locations in one invoice may be extracted from similar locations in other invoices in the group. Previously discovered data patterns may be reused on similar invoices. Data can also be manually extracted. Different pattern recognition engines, expert systems, rule-based engines and other approaches may also be used to extract data from invoices.
Processed invoices can also be used to check or refine the templates for an issuer. Differences between invoices for the same issuer or deviations from past norms can also be used to flag potential problems, as well as to request human review.
If, however, in step 420, the operator determines that the invoice cannot be matched with a known template (no branch), the operator creates 450 a new template. This new template may be created completely new or it may be created by modifying a suitable existing template. The new template, along with its issuer information and the invoice, is stored 460 in storage system 103. In step 470, a recognition simulation is performed to verify that the new template works correctly, namely that (1) the automated recognition system can properly identify the new template for the invoice and (2) data can be accurately extracted from the invoice based on the template. If, in step 480, the template simulation works correctly (yes branch), the invoice is sent 440 to the recognition process 300 as described above (e.g., to data extraction step 350). If, however, the simulation does not work correctly (no branch), the template may be manually adjusted 490. The template editor may highlight the section that created problems. For example, a field for OCR may be too narrow or too wide. If the field is too wide, for example, the system may attempt to interpret a part of the logo as a part of the address. In the case of a field that is too narrow, some characters may be cut off. The operator can adjust 490 the template accordingly to solve such problems.
Another aspect of the invention is cross-organizational learning. For example, if an invoice addressed to Customer A is identified as being from Vendor 1, and the system can then identify other signature items (image, “from” address, etc.) in the invoice. Thereafter the system may be able to use those other signature items to select the correct template for the invoice, and use that template to find the correct data in certain sections of the invoice. Additionally, if a same format invoice from this same Vendor 1 is sent to a second Customer B, then the system can recognize from the signature information that the invoice is from Vendor 1 and apply the template to the invoice to extract the correct data.
One advantage of the approach described above is that the capture of invoices can be made economical for SMEs. The number of invoices processed can be aggregated over a large number of SMEs, thus achieving economies of scale that can be shared by the businesses. In addition, although any one SME may only receive a few invoices from any particular issuer, the community of SMEs in the aggregate may receive a large number of invoices from that issuer. This then makes it cost efficient to develop templates or other processes to handle those invoices, whereas it would not be cost efficient for each SME to do so individually. The system of
In one approach, the community of recipients can themselves improve the process. For example, the system 100 can enable the community to provide input about distinguishing features of the invoices. Various recipients and/or issuers may suggest different features for recognizing invoices. There may even be a community process for determining preferred features for distinguishing invoices. A similar process can be used to determine templates, including determining fields in templates.
Another aspect of community is that different recipients can exchange their experiences of dealing with issuers. Many recipients may be in a similar situation with respect to issuers. Another beneficial aspect of the community is that SMEs are likely to deal with “small” issuers. There will be a very large number of small issuers (approximately 25 million in the U.S.), but each one issues invoices to only a small number of customers (typically, 20-30). While it is not economical for a centralized identification process to be applied to this set of issuers, it is economical to let the recipients/issuers themselves help identify the issuers and, in the aggregate, create a comprehensive catalog of the issuers.
Therefore, the described systems and processes allow the integration of paper and/or electronic document invoices into an automated system to reduce the need of manual labor (such as manual input of invoices) in processing the transactions. In addition, the systems can be fully automated and process these transactions without human intervention.
At step 703, the system asks the user if the user wants to write one check for multiple invoices and the process branches based on the user's answer. This option may be presented to the user each time process 700 is implemented, or the user could configure the system to always select or never select this option. If a check is generated for only one invoice (no branch), the system sets 704 a counter to 1 and generates 705 a payment document print file for a first invoice. As described above for the payment document 600, the payment document contains an image of the first invoice. In step 706 the counter is advanced one increment. In step 707 the process branches, depending on whether payment documents have been generated for all the pending invoices. If all have been generated (yes branch), the process advances to step 711, where the payment document print files are printed and the payment documents are stored in data repository 103 for recording, and the process terminates at step 712. The print files may be printed locally or remotely (e.g., through the data repository 103). If payment documents have not been generated for all invoices (no branch), the process loops back from step 707 to step 705, and another payment document is generated for the next invoice, and repeats until all pending invoices are paid.
Alternatively, if, in step 703, the user elects, or the system is configured to pay multiple invoices with one check (yes branch), the system prepares 708 a layout of the payment document. The payment document may optionally be presented to the user for approval 709. If the user does not accept the layout (no branch), the process goes back to step 703, where the user may elect to print a payment document for each invoice separately. If, in step 709, the user accepts the proposed layout (yes branch), the system generates 710 a payment document print file containing multiple invoice images and whose check payment amount equals the total of all the included invoices. The invoice images may be smaller than they would be in a payment document containing only one invoice image, depending on the number of invoices being paid and the layout of the payment document. In step 711, the payment document is sent to a printer (local or remote) and data repository 103 (from which the remote printing may occur), and the process terminates at step 712.
In some cases, an image of the invoice may be printed on the same page as the check; while in other cases, multiple images may be printed. In yet other cases, one or more images may be printed on the back of the page, opening the front for classic statements or other uses, including but not limited to advertisements, promotions or campaigns.
In some cases, instead of or in addition to printing an image of the invoice on the payment document, an identifier of the invoice image may be printed on the check section of the payment document. For example, a URL (Uniform Resource Locator) of an invoice image may be printed on the face (or the back) of the check. As a result, one can correctly and easily identify the corresponding invoice for a check payment by visiting the printed URL. The identifier can also be incorporated into the payment transaction in other manners based on the nature of the payment. For example, if the payment is made through an ACH transaction, a URL of the invoice may be included in the ACH addenda field. As a result, the URL will subsequently show up on the payor and/or payee's bank's web summary and bank statement.
Therefore, the described systems and processes provide a simple, easy-to-use approach to generate enhanced invoice payment documents with features that ensure that the credits of the underlying payments are applied to the correct invoices.
Having the endorsement information thus clearly printed is advantageous compared to using a standard institution endorsement stamp, because the latter can be smudged, faint, or otherwise difficult to read. Having the endorsement information clearly printed also reduces the risk of the check being erroneously or fraudulently deposited in a wrong account. Also, since the check is eventually cleared by a depositing bank, it is reasonable that the depositing bank verified the endorsement information. In addition, the deposit information may be captured from the depositing bank and transferred to the drafting bank or an electronic payment system (EPS) such as the one shown in
The system receives 903 the solicited payee information (e.g., deposit information) from the payees and stores 904 the payee information in data repository 103. The user may respond to the soliciting message and sets up a payee account with all the required deposit information, thus helping the system to obtain new customers. In step 905 the system retrieves payee information from data repository 103. In step 906 the system may additionally verify the received payee information by executing a mock transaction. As described in detail below, the mock transaction verifies payee information through approaches such as the random deposit approach.
In step 907, the process branches. If the data is not satisfactorily verified (no branch), the process returns to step 902 and the system sends a new message to the payee soliciting information. If the data is satisfactorily verified (yes branch), the process branches again in step 908 based on whether the payment is an electronic payment. If the payment is an electronic payment (yes branch), in step 909 the system deposits the electronic payment to an account (e.g., through an ACH transaction, an EFT payment, or a wire transfer) specified by the verified payee information (e.g., account name, routing number, account number). The process ends in step 910. If the payment is a paper check payment (no branch), in step 911 the system sends print instructions to a check printer, including instructions for printing information such as the payee name, account number, ABA (American Bankers Association) number, and other similar information on the endorsement section of the check. The process ends in step 910.
If the system receives no response to its message from the payee through the web interface within an allotted time period, such as, for example, two business days, the system sends out a check to the payee without printing information on the endorsement section.
The mock transaction utilized by the system to verify 906 payee information may involve one or more transactions designated to verify various aspects of the payee information. For example, the system may create a check used to verify the deposit information provided by the payee and send the check to the payee. The check may include a partial payment of an outstanding invoice. If the check is subsequently successfully deposited, the system can assume that the depositing bank has verified the deposit information, consider such information verified, and make payment for the remaining portion of the invoice. Thus, the process allows such verification before starting electronic transfers at all, thus helping to add a layer of security to avoid payments from being misrouted.
As another example, a partial payment of an outstanding invoice may be made via electronic payment (e.g., ACH) according to the deposit information provided by the payee, and the remaining balance of the invoice may be paid via a check. Once the customer has confirmed that the electronic payment was successfully posted, the system considers the provided deposit information successfully verified and makes subsequent payments electronically according to the verified deposit information. The payee may specify a preference of electronic payment, check payment, or a combination of both. The system can make the payments according to the user preference.
As a third example, the mock transaction may conduct a random deposit that involves crediting or debiting a random small amount (typically two small transactions) and then request the payee to verify either the transaction ID or the cent amounts. The random deposit approach helps to identify inaccurate account numbers (e.g., typos) and verify that the person providing the information has legal access to the account being set up.
In another aspect, the system reconciles the payee information with additional data in addition to or instead of the random deposit approach to prevent check fraud (e.g., illegitimate account). For example, the system may populate the bank information of the payees from the endorsement from the primary bank shown on previously cleared checks, and use such information to verify against the provided payee information. If the information matches, the payee information is deemed to be verified. If there is a partial match, a judgment call is made by a risk underwriter. If there is no match, the payee fails the verification 906. Such bank information may be solicited from the depositing bank by separate transmission or from other service providers such as SafeChecks (see http://www.positivepay.net/). The information retrieved from previously cleared checks can also be used to reconcile payee identity (e.g., name) on the record to detect fraud.
In yet another aspect, the system considers certain users (e.g., administrators of working accounts) trustworthy, and either does not verify 906 or verifies 906 their payee information with less scrutiny. In addition, trusted administrators of working accounts can extend their trust or infer trust onto others by being involved with setting up accounts, for example, of key vendors or clients, thus implicitly extending their trust. A composite trust rating considers items such as how often, how much, for how long and how recently successful transactions have been completed in conjunction with a particular administrator. In some cases, a single composite score includes weighted aspects. In other cases, two or more scores may be used to represent different aspects, individually or in combination.
A trusted administrator can confer some of his or her composite trust rating by inviting and confirming new applicants. Typically, only a certain percentage of influence by the trusted administrators will be allowed to be inferred. The rest can be earned, or determined by providing multiple references. Certain events as well as non-events may reduce the trust of an administrator. Others may increase it. Typically, a separate, but related value may be used for the company of the trusted administrator, creating a network of trust relationships. This can also be used to help other things, such as the company's credit worthiness.
Therefore, the described systems and processes generate enhanced payment documents with features that ensure that the payment will be deposited in the correct account, and thus prevents mistakes and frauds. The described systems and processes also reconcile cleared checks with records and name identification data.
In both cases, the payor number and the invoice number are made unique among the payors, the invoices, and/or payor/invoice combinations. For example, if two lockbox customers issue invoices to a same payor, the payor numbers on the two invoices may be different from each other. In some cases a unique number may be generated by lockbox operator system 102, in conjunction with data repository 103 and software 1302. Generating a unique number may be implemented as appending a unique prefix to a standard payor number and invoice number issued by customer software 1301. In some cases, the system 1300 provides a plug-in for software 1301 that can communicate with lockbox operator system 102 to download for each transaction the required information to generate unique numbers.
If neither the invoice number nor the payor number is available when the payment is being processed, the system could use one or more of the following approaches to resolving the payment. For example, the system could provide an exception handling user interface (UI). In this UI, a user (e.g., the payor, the payee, a lockbox staff) could look up all outstanding invoices across all companies using the lockbox service. This lookup would allow searching on any of the fields on the check, including the payor, the amount, or the payee. Another option would be for the system to credit the payment to the payee, but provide an interface for the payor/payee to select the invoice it should be applied to. Alternatively, the system could email the payor/payee to ask which invoice the payment was meant for. And, as another option, an agent could call the payor/payee to determine which invoice the payment was meant for.
Therefore, the described systems and processes efficiently and correctly deposit incoming checks to the correct lockbox clients' accounts, independent of the payor identity and of the accounting software used for issuing invoices.
System 1600 thus permits the making and receiving of payments on the intra-bank host (within a specific bank 1601). Examples of intra-bank transactions include transactions between accounts 1603a(a-n) and 1602a in bank 1601a and, respectively, transactions between accounts 1602n and 1603n(a-n) within bank 1601n. The combination of these two intra-bank host-based transfers enables a transfer from a customer 1603a(a-n) at Bank 1601a to a vendor 1603n(a n) at bank 1601n to be completed within bank clearing system 1609. Therefore, if a total of all the balances of the master account 1602x and customer and partner accounts 1603x(a-n) in a single bank 1601x is calculated, then to clear the transactions all that needs to be done is to effect a transfer between clearing entity master accounts 1602a-1602n at each of the respective banks 1601a-1601n, in this example, to keep the clearing entity master accounts 1602a-n balanced (within preset boundaries). The transfer needs not be the exactly accurate amount of the difference of the transfers effected at each end, because there may be a base balance, which, in this example, is a base amount in each of the master accounts 1602a-n, that is allowed to vary within a certain range.
This approach can be extended not just to two banks, but to dozens, hundreds, or all of the banks in a country or in the world. With a few strategically selected banks, in many cases a vast majority of the transactions can be effected in this way immediately. The balancing transaction between account 1602a and another account 1602x (x within b-n) to keep all the floats in the master accounts 1602a-n in range could be done, for example, just before the end of the day using a wire transfer, to effect immediate transfers between banks Other similar money transfer mechanisms (e.g., ACH, EFT) may also be used.
Making and receiving intra-bank payments directly on a bank's host system enable the transfers to clear immediately (or return a message immediately if funds are not available). Therefore, such intra-bank transactions eliminate the risk to the third-party system for managing payments. In addition, when access to the bank's host is not available, the bank may provide accelerated messages for returns, allowing the ACH transactions to clear in one day rather than the customary two-day period.
In
In step 1703 the system splits the sorted transactions into, in this example, infra-bank transaction groups A and B, for each of the banks 1601a-n having pending transactions. Group A contains transactions of money from the respective customer accounts 1603x(x) into the master account 1602x; and group B from the master account 1602y into the receiving partner account 1603y(y). By splitting the transactions into two groups, the transactions transferring money to the master accounts can be effected first. In some cases, for all transactions where the initial transfer from customer accounts 1603x(x) to master account 1602x was successful, and where the master account balance 1602y supports it, the funds can be transferred immediately to customer accounts 1603y(y).
In step 1704 the imbalance among the master accounts at all the participating banks can be calculated. In step 1705 the transactions in group A are effected, and in step 1706 the interbank wire is effected. In step 1707, after verifying that the interbank wire has been received, a transaction for group B (those accounts where the master account balance 1602y did not support the second transfer in step 1703) is effected. Depending on the timing of the interbank wire, transaction group B may be executed on the next business day. Intra-bank (host) transactions such as those of groups A and B may be done after close of business. However, the interbank wire used in step 1706 is only available at a specific hour. The process ends at step 1708.
It is clear that many modifications and variations of this embodiment may be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the novel art of this disclosure. For example, instead of having two transaction groups, more groups or just a single group can be defined, with the latter option of one group especially suitable in cases where the balance is sufficient. Additionally, the system could analyze the money flow among banks, based on a daily, weekly, and quarterly pattern, and other suitable factors, including but not limited to holidays, weather, economic indicators, stock market indicators, and hence calculate which amounts must be exchanged and which amounts can be taken out of balances, knowing that there is a high likelihood of the balances being replenished in the next few days. Thus this technique can reduce the amount of wire transactions. Also, in another case, a super-master account may be established as a single hub to clear multiple master accounts, or, in other situations, a master account may be established with banks that have their own real-time links to other banks, therefore allowing non-wire transfers among those linked banks in real time. These modifications and variations do not depart from the broader spirit and scope of the invention, and the examples cited here are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than in a restrictive sense.
Therefore, comparing to the conventional approaches, the described systems and processes transfer money between accounts at different banks faster and more cost-effectively.
Both the fee-based modules 1802, 1803 provide fee-based services to users (e.g., customers and/or vendors) with fee-based accounts. In addition, the system 1800 invites certain customers (e.g., accounts payable) and vendors (e.g., accounts receivables) to use system functions of the free modules 1804, 1805 for free. Also, customers who have a fee-based accounts payable account may have a free private vendor. For clarity, a customer with a fee-based accounts payable account 1803 is called a “paid customer”; a customer with a free accounts payable account 1805 is called a “free customer”; a vendor with a paid accounts receivable account 1802 is called a “paid vendor”, and a vendor with a free accounts receivable account 1804 is called a “free vendor”.
The vendor directory 1801 allows the system to identify a vendor and thus transfer payments without requiring any specific financial information about this company. The vendor directory 1801 supports additional biller networks and EDI (Electronic Data Interchange) vendors, promotes vendors (e.g., account receivables) to directory, and provides pay to console. In one embodiment, the vendor directory 1801 comprises a database that stores information about vendors and some of the information (e.g., full business name such as “AT&T Wireless” and “AT&T Small Business Services”, postal address) is searchable by users. The database may also include information about the customers (e.g., customer's name and mailing address), some of which may be searchable by users. Each of the users (vendors, customers) has a unique ID (also called the network ID) that can be assigned or generated (e.g., by applying cryptographic hash function to information about the user).
A paid customer may pay to its accounts-receivable vendors, using one of the transactions 1810a-n, either to paid vendors or to free vendors, which the customer may invite its vendor to become, to simplify the process of paying bills. The free vendor gets a free, no-hassle account that allows him to receive payments from existing paid customers. The goal is eventually to encourage the free vendors to become a paid vendor, as indicated by arrow 1806, so the vendor would have the ability to also invoice other parties. When a vendor (also called an account receivable user or AR user) receives a payment through the system 1800, the payment is automatically matched to the appropriate customer and invoice in the vendor's accounting system. Paid vendors can likewise invite new customers to free accounts payable accounts 1805 or work with existing paid customer and receive payments using the system 1800. Similarly, the goal here is to eventually let the free customers become paid customers, as indicated by arrow 1807. In some cases, the electronic billing and payment system 1800 may provide promotions to encourage users to invite not-yet-linked customers or vendors. Unlike typically offered trial accounts, the system 1800 may set no time limit for the limited functionality provided by the free modules 1804, 1805.
By offering enhanced funds flow management, migration into the system 1800 becomes easy. Further, the system 1800 offers plug-ins into popular accounting systems thereby allowing easy integration into a company's operation without disrupting or complicating internal processes. In fact, each user can update its accounting system without even knowing what the other user's accounting system is via the network synchronization. Thus a vendor can easily achieve single site billing, and customers can have the same convenience. Rather than having to log into a myriad of web sites operated by different entities (e.g., vendors, banks, service providers, etc.), all the invoices arrive at one central location and flow from there directly into the company's accounts payable, thus reducing the overhead and time wasted. Also, statements and reconciliations maybe transmitted among the accounts, and on the return path adjustments, credits, discounts, etc., all with much clearer and simpler communication than today's scribble on a copy of an invoice, etc.
Additional system functions may include managed visibility of the payment process. For example, a customer could let a vendor know that he has received a bill, that the bill has been approved, and when it is scheduled for payment, thus offering better transparency of the process. In some cases queries and or complaints may also be routed over the system. However, the customer has control over these transparency features and can decide what features are to become visible to the vendor. Additionally, the system may offer a mutual rating system that could, for example, rate a customer on such characteristics as timeliness of payment, accuracy of disclosed information, follow-through, etc. Because all the data is available, such as billing date, payment terms, and actual payment, as well as whether there were complaints or other issues, a very accurate payment quality can be derived, much more accurate than typical rating agencies can obtain on small or medium enterprises.
It is clear that many modifications and variations of the above-described embodiments may be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the novel art of this disclosure. For example, instead of having two transaction groups, more groups or just a single group can be defined, with the latter option of one group especially suitable in cases where the balance is sufficient. Additionally, the system 1800 could analyze the money flow among banks, based on a daily, weekly, and quarterly pattern, and other suitable factors, including but not limited to holidays, weather, economic indicators, stock market indicators, etc. and hence calculate which amounts must be exchanged and which amounts can be taken out of balances, knowing that there is a high likelihood of the balances being replenished in the next few days. Thus this technique can reduce the amount of wire transactions. Also, in another case, a super-master account may be established as a single hub to clear multiple master accounts, or, in other situations, a master account may be established with banks that have their own real-time link to other banks, therefore allowing non-wire transfers among those linked banks in real time. These modifications and variations do not depart from the broader spirit and scope of the invention, and the examples cited here are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than in a restrictive sense.
Accordingly, in one aspect, the described embodiments provide a system and method that allows two companies to abstract their bank accounts and still exchange money. In another aspect, the described embodiments provide a system and method that allows a vendor or customer to populate and update the data in their customer's or vendor's accounting system from their own accounting system EDI-style. This approach eliminates the need to re-enter data manually, which typically can also increase risks for transcription errors. The vendor/customer may define a permissions mask controlling when and how information is shared during the billing/invoice payment process (e.g., upon the completion of a workflow). For example, one company may choose to propagate data to its vendors informing them that an invoice has been received, that the invoice has been approved for payment, and that the invoice has been paid. A second company may choose, through its permissions mask, to only share the fact that the invoice has been paid, not the interim steps leading to that bill being paid.
In another aspect, the described embodiments provide a system and method that allows synchronization of invoices and payments from vendor to customer, and back (e.g., both ways). In another aspect, the described embodiments provide a system and method that allows vendors and customers to define a permission mask controlling when/how information is shared during the billing/invoice payment process. In another aspect, the described embodiments provide a system and method that allows both vendors and customers to have a unique network ID in a master directory independent of regular items, including but not limited to tax ID, email address, corporation number, etc., thus enabling them to link to other companies, and also allowing companies to invite their vendors and customers to create an account which links them to the their customer/vendor in a single step. In another aspect, the described embodiments provide a system and method that allows companies to manage the flow of funds into and out of a single bank account for purposes of making bill payments and collecting on receivables. In another aspect, the described embodiments provide a system and method that allows a company to accept invitations to connect from multiple vendors or customers from within a single system, and also allows users to invite groups of vendors or customers from a database of vendors/customers in a company's accounting system.
In step 1901, the system provides a user (hereinafter called an “invitor”) multiple various system options including an option to bill (if the invitor is a vendor/accounts receivable) and/or an option to pay (if the invitor is a customer/accounts payable). In step 1902, the system receives from the invitor a user selection of the option to bill/pay, and provides the invitor with a list of candidate billees/payees and/or an option to input a billee/payee. In step 1903, the system receives from the invitor a user selection (or input) of the respective billee or payee, and provides the invitor with various applicable system options including sending the billee/payee an invitation for a free account with the system. In step 1904 the system receives from the invitor a user selection of sending an invitation for a free account to the selected/inputted billee/payee (hereinafter called the “invitee”), and provides the invitor with security question options that the invitee must answer in order to accept the invitation. For an invitee that the invitor knows well, he may draw from a set of standard security questions provided by the system or create a security question about personal information, such as city of birth, name of first pet, name of grammar school, etc. Alternatively, the invitor may draw from a set of standard security questions provided by the system or create a security question about company-related information that only the correct invitee would know, such as, for example, name of manager, last four digits of business telephone number, etc. In step 1905, the system receives from the invitor a user selection (or input) of a security question, along with the “correct” answer that he anticipates from the invitee. The system may then receive from the invitor inputs regarding other billing and/or payment transactions, or repeat steps 1901 through 1905 to invite other entities.
The completion of step 1905 triggers the system to perform step 1906, in which the system creates and transmits an invitation (e.g., an email message) to the invitee. In step 1907, the system receives a response to the invitation (e.g., email or other type of message) including an answer to the selected security question. In step 1908, the system verifies the response by comparing the answer from the invitee against the “correct” answer entered by the invitor. The system can be configured to, either as default or in case of a non-matching response, present the invitee's response to the invitor for further verification. In step 1909, once the response is verified (either by the system or by the invitee), the system notifies the invitee of acceptance (or not) into a free part of the system extended to partners of paying users. In some cases, the processes of steps 1906 through 1909 may all be carried out via email. In other cases, the initial invitation prepared in step 1906 may contain a link to a secure web site where the system and invitee execute the remaining steps. In some cases, after an invitor has instructed the system to send an invitation, the system may detect that the named invitee has already been activated for service by another customer of the service (or otherwise has an account with the system). In such a case, rather than sending out an invitation, the system asks the invitor to verify the identity of the proposed invitee to ensure that the invitee is indeed the same entity. If so, the invitee is then linked automatically to the invitor for services such as receiving electronic invoices and payment services, or receiving electronic transactions at no cost, etc. During the matching process, in some cases there may be a near match, which then can be confirmed by the user; or the system may ask the user to select from a list of existing active users.
A billing and payment system creates a check for a user of the system to make a payment to a non-user, and pre-populates the endorsement section as illustrated in
The system has essentially four zones of entity qualifications as illustrated in the map 2100. There is a safe zone 2103, which comprises known and trusted entities. Entities that are less well known and/or less well trusted are in an O.K. zone 2104. Entities whose qualities are unknown, usually because they are new to the system, are in an unclear zone 2105. Everything else beyond those three zones is an unsafe zone 2106. Depending on how the system is configured, new accounts may start in different locations in the map 2100, such as points 2110, 2111, and 2112. As the entities establishes itself to the system, their trustworthiness/familiarity to the system move in the map 2100 along trajectories such as, respectively, 2120, 2121, and 2122, which trajectories may be linear or not, depending on such variables as types of transactions, time periods between transactions, amounts transacted, and hopefully eventually, ending up in the safe zone 2103. For example, if any entity transacts only one or a few transactions of very small amounts, it may not progress beyond the OK zone 2104, because the system does not know if these transactions are only for the purpose of gaining a trusted rating from the system.
In some cases, these trust ratings may be available to customers; in other cases, this data may be available internally only, for internal assessment of transactions. In yet other cases, the data can be made publicly available; thus the system can act as infrastructure or basis for a rating agency. Also, additional information such as timeliness of payment, etc., may be separately rated or considered in the map 2100. Further, based on the receivables side, a company may be rated on the timeliness of payments received from it relative to the due date. Accordingly, a lot of information may be mined from the information derived from behavior of both customers and their partners, but not necessarily all information may be made public (as in available to customers or to the public in general, for example, for a fee), nor is it desirable to make all the information public. Additionally, the system may take into account the referral or recommendation of a particularly trusted party, such as a CPA firm or an accredited bookkeeping firm. Further, these trusted parties themselves may have their ratings going up or down based on their behavior and the behavior of the companies they have recommended.
All received documents are placed in a queue 2205, out of which they are processed by one or more of various means 2206a-n. The queue 2205 allows for efficient and secure document processing by a third party. The system 2204 restricts documents/information made available to processing means 2206 to only those necessary for the processing (and not any other potentially sensitive data in the customer's account), and thereby enables a much more secure process. By allowing the processing to be routed to a single queue, the system 2204 becomes a central resource for working through documents across a number of unique accounts belonging to different companies or organizations. Examples of the processing means 2206 include manual input of printed data by data entry personnel, OCR scanning, and any other similar suitable processing means.
In one embodiment, every document is processed by at least two separate processing means 2206, as an accuracy check. If the two processing results do not match, the document is processed further (e.g., by another processing means 2206) to obtain at least two matching results. When the document is satisfactorily processed, it is stored in a data repository 2207, from which it is then passed back to the corresponding document source, and/or entities needing it. To pass back the processed document, the system 2204 may send a message with the document attached as a secure importable file that could be imported directly into the accounting system of the receiving entity. In some cases, the system 2204 may send the document directly to an online accounting system (not shown), subject to the online accounting system providing the right credentials; while in other cases the system 2204 sends only a notification, telling the entity to go to a secure web site and download the file, in a manner similar to services currently available to banking customers.
It is clear that many modifications and variations of the system and method disclosed herein may be made by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the novel art of this disclosure.
These modifications and variations do not depart from its broader spirit and scope, and the examples cited here are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense. In alternate embodiments, the invention is implemented in computer hardware, firmware, software, and/or combinations thereof. Apparatus of the invention can be implemented in a computer program product tangibly embodied in a non-transitory computer-readable storage device for execution by a programmable processor; and method steps of the invention can be performed by a programmable processor executing a program of instructions to perform functions of the invention by operating on input data and generating output. The invention can be implemented advantageously in one or more computer programs that are executable on a programmable system including at least one programmable processor coupled to receive data and instructions from, and to transmit data and instructions to, a data storage system, at least one input device, and at least one output device. Each computer program can be implemented in a high-level procedural or object-oriented programming language, or in assembly or machine language if desired; and in any case, the language can be a compiled or interpreted language. Suitable processors include, by way of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors. Generally, a processor will receive instructions and data from a read-only memory and/or a random access memory. Generally, a computer will include one or more mass storage devices for storing data files; such devices include magnetic disks, such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and optical disks. Storage devices suitable for tangibly embodying computer program instructions and data (also called the “non-transitory computer-readable storage media”) include all forms of non-volatile memory, including by way of example semiconductor memory devices, such as EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks such as internal hard disks and removable disks; magneto-optical disks; and CD-ROM disks. Any of the foregoing can be supplemented by, or incorporated in, ASICs (application-specific integrated circuits) and other forms of hardware.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/046,335, filed Mar. 11, 2011, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/363,647, filed Jan. 30, 2009, and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/313,075 filed on Mar. 11, 2010, and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/356,477, filed on Jun. 18, 2010. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/363,647 claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/025,255, filed Jan. 31, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/059,255, filed Jun. 6, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/088,984, filed Aug. 14, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/140,752, filed Dec. 24, 2008; and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/141,819, filed Dec. 31, 2008. The subject matter of all of the foregoing is incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61313075 | Mar 2010 | US | |
| 61356477 | Jun 2010 | US | |
| 61025255 | Jan 2008 | US | |
| 61059255 | Jun 2008 | US | |
| 61088984 | Aug 2008 | US | |
| 61140752 | Dec 2008 | US | |
| 61141819 | Dec 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13046335 | Mar 2011 | US |
| Child | 16031833 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12363647 | Jan 2009 | US |
| Child | 13046335 | US |
