The invention relates generally to electrical connectors, and more particularly, to a connector that minimizes crosstalk among signal conductors in the connector.
In electrical systems, there is increasing concern for preserving signal integrity as signal speed and bandwidth increase. One source of signal degradation is crosstalk between multiple signal paths. In the case of an electrical connector carrying multiple signals, crosstalk occurs when signals conducted over a first signal path are partly transferred by inductive or capacitive coupling into a second signal path. This is sometimes referred to as negative coupling. The transferred signals produce crosstalk in the second path that degrades the signal routed over the second path.
For example, a typical industry standard type RJ-45 communication connector includes contacts that are planar in the mating region and physically long. The RJ-45 plug design is dictated by industry standards and is inherently susceptible to crosstalk. In conventional RJ-45 plug and jack connectors, all conductors extend closely parallel to one another over a length of the connector body. One pair of conductors is also split around another conductor pair. Thus, signal crosstalk may be induced between and among different pairs of connector conductors. The amplitude of the crosstalk, or the degree of signal degradation, generally increases as the frequency increases. More crosstalk can be created by the contacts in the jack that interface with the contacts in the plug. As signal speed and density increase, alien crosstalk (e.g., crosstalk between neighboring contacts and/or conductors) must also be addressed in preserving signal integrity at both the current Category 6 transmission frequency standard of up to 250 MHz, and at future (higher) transmission frequency standards.
At least some RJ-45 jacks include features separate from the signal contacts that are intended to suppress or compensate for crosstalk inherent to signals within a mating plug. However, the shortcomings that are inherent in jacks such as the RJ-45 can be expected to become more problematic as system demands (e.g., transmission frequencies) continue to increase. A connector that minimizes crosstalk as close as possible to the mating point of the plug contacts and jack contacts is needed rather than another connector that corrects for crosstalk after the signals have passed through the signal contacts.
Physical stability in the mechanical connection between a plug and jack can also be improved. In current configurations, the plug fits almost entirely within the jack. Contacts within one or more of the plug and jack are biased towards one another in an attempt to maintain good electrical contact between the respective plug and jack contacts. However, the housings for the jack and plug are typically configured for easy insertion and removal from one another, rather than for providing stability to the connection therebetween. Housings that improve the stability of the mechanical interconnection between a plug and jack are also needed.
In one aspect, an electrical connector is provided. The electrical connector comprises a housing comprising a mating end and a wire receiving end, and a printed circuit board (PCB) mounted within the housing, the PCB comprising an opening formed therethrough. The electrical connector further comprises a plurality of contacts configured to extend from the PCB. The opening is configured to receive a second electrical connector configured to mate with the electrical connector.
In another aspect, a printed circuit board (PCB) configured for placement within a housing of an electrical connector is provided. The PCB comprises an opening formed therethrough and dimensioned for insertion of a portion of a second electrical connector, a plurality of contacts attached to the PCB and configured to extend into the opening, a plurality of circuit traces formed therein, and a plurality of wire receiving holes formed therein. The circuit traces extend from a respective contact to a respective said wire receiving hole.
In a further aspect, a method for reducing crosstalk between contacts in an electrical connector for signals above 250 MHz is provided. The method comprises providing a printed circuit board (PCB), having an opening therethrough, the opening dimensioned to accept insertion of at least a portion of a mating electrical connector, and configuring the PCB with a plurality of contacts that extend into the opening, each said contact configured to make non-linear physical contact with respective contacts of the mating electrical connector.
It is to be understood that the benefits described herein are also applicable to other connectors carrying fewer or greater numbers of contacts in alternative embodiments. The following description is therefore provided for illustrative purposes only and is but one potential application of the inventive concepts herein. As further described herein, contacts 20 are mounted on a printed circuit board (PCB) that is fixed in position with respect to the housing 26. The contacts may includes one or more pairs of contacts 20 configured as differential pairs.
The PCB 100 further includes a plurality of contact receiving holes 110 configured for the insertion of an electrical conductor, for example, a compliant pin or other solder contact. In one embodiment, contact receiving holes 110 are plated through and configured for the connection of a compliant pin contact. In one embodiment, the PCB 100 is a multiple layer circuit board and, though not shown in
Some or all of the compensation contacts will electrically connect to one or more compensation elements (not shown) located on PCB 100. The compensation elements are selected to provide a desired noise compensation to the respective signal contacts. Additional conductive traces (not shown) may extend from the contacts configured as compensation contacts. These additional conductive traces are configured to provide one or more of a reactance, a ground plane, and shielding to PCB 100 as further described below in order to improve the integrity of the signals passing to the respective signal contact. These conductive traces are generally referred to herein as compensation elements.
More specifically, the compensation elements are selected to provide a desired crosstalk compensation to counteract crosstalk at the contacts 42 in the plug 14 through direct contact of the compensation contacts with the plug contacts 42. From the perspective of the jack 12, the plug contacts 42 and the wires (not shown) extending through plug 14 are considered to be a noise source, or more specifically, a source of crosstalk. Thus, in applying compensation directly to the plug contacts 42, the crosstalk compensation is applied to the source of the crosstalk.
In one embodiment, the compensation elements include a conductive element that provides a reactance that is configured to counteract the crosstalk that may be present within the plug 14. In an exemplary embodiment, the reactance primarily includes a capacitance. The compensation elements may be formed using techniques well known in the art, for example, capacitive coupling, for such purposes. For example, two or more compensation contacts may be placed in close proximity to each other so as to create the reactance to counteract the crosstalk. Another method may include placing conductors on the PCB 100 in close proximity to one another, such as interlaced or aligned copper pours. A third method may include placing discrete chips such as a capacitor on the PCB 100 in contact with the conductive traces. The compensation elements may also include other circuit components that create a coupling to counteract the crosstalk within the plug 14.
In alternative embodiments, contacts 120 and 130 are attached to PCB 100 using at least one of a compliant pin process, a solder process and a clip-on process. As described above, contacts 120 and 130 are configured to engage (e.g., make electrical contact), with the contacts 42 of plug 14 upon its insertion into jack 12. However, a shape, location, and orientation of contacts 120 and contacts 130 is believed to be different than that of contacts utilized in known jacks, and, as further explained, results in a reduced electrical path length for the signals traveling between contacts 42 and contacts 120 and 130. In known jack and plug configurations, the contacts are substantially rectangular and elongated, and result in a comparatively long electrical path for the signals through the contacts of the plug and jack before any signal compensation can be applied. In the embodiments described herein, the electrical path length for signals traveling through contacts 42 and 20, from contact to PCB 100 is greatly reduced at compared to known plug and jack configurations. As such, electrical delays are reduced and the variations in impedance that occur with the longer electrical path lengths in known jack and plug configurations are avoided. In a preferred embodiment, contact between plug contacts 42 and contact 20 of the jack occur in the plane of PCB 100. As used herein, the phrase “within the plane of the PCB” refers to an area that is bounded by the dimensions of opening 102, and the front and back surfaces of the PCB 100.
Such a configuration also allows an overall length of jack 12 to be reduced from known jack and plug embodiments. Utilization of PCB 100 also provides a physically stronger and more stable interconnection between jack 12 and plug 14 than is accomplished in previous configurations, in part because the plug 14 engages both the PCB 100 and the housing 26 of the jack 12. In one embodiment, housing 26 is formed, typically molded with a PCB carrier therein. The PCB carrier is typically a channel formed around an interior perimeter of housing 26 to retain PCB 100. In a typical embodiment, housing 26 is formed in two pieces which allows for the easy insertion of PCB 100 into housing 26.
While the invention has been described in terms of various specific embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4040699 | Rasmussen | Aug 1977 | A |
4221458 | Hughes et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4497526 | Myers | Feb 1985 | A |
4950171 | Muzslay | Aug 1990 | A |
5696660 | Price | Dec 1997 | A |
5702271 | Steinman | Dec 1997 | A |
6146184 | Wilson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6319045 | Sawayanagi et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6428362 | Phommachanh | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6469681 | Jones et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6896557 | Aekins et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6988900 | Meister | Jan 2006 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
08250240 | Sep 1996 | JP |
11008024 | Nov 1999 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070015414 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |