The invention pertains to laser light sources and particularly to vertical cavity surface emitting lasers. More particularly, the invention pertains to long wavelength lasers.
A vertical cavity surface emitting laser (VCSEL) may include a first distributed Bragg reflector (DBR), also referred to as a mirror stack, formed on top of a substrate by semiconductor manufacturing techniques, an active region formed on top of the first mirror stack, and a second mirror stack formed on top of the active region. The VCSEL may be driven by a current forced through the active region, typically achieved by providing a first contact on the reverse side of the substrate and a second contact on top of the second mirror stack. The first contact may instead be on top of the first mirror stack in a coplanar arrangement.
VCSEL mirror stacks are generally formed of multiple pairs of layers often referred to as mirror pairs. The pairs of layers are formed of a material system generally consisting of two materials having different indices of refraction and being easily lattice matched to the other portions of the VCSEL. For example, a GaAs based VCSEL may commonly use an AlAs/GaAs or AlAs/AlGaAs material system where the refractive index of each layer of a pair may be changed by altering the aluminum content in the layers. In some devices, the number of mirror pairs per stack may range from 20 to 60 to achieve a high percentage of reflectivity, depending on the difference between the refractive indices of the layers. A larger number of pairs increases the percentage of reflected light.
In many VCSELS, conventional material systems may perform adequately. However, new products are being developed requiring VCSELs which emit light having long wavelengths. VCSELs emitting light having a long wavelength ate of great interest in the optical telecommunications industry because of a low fiber dispersion at 1310 nanometers (nm) and a low fiber loss at 1550 nm. As an example, a long wavelength VCSEL may-be obtained by using a VCSEL having an InGaAs/InGaAsP (or InAlGaAs) active region. When an InGaAs/InGaAsP active region is used, an InP/InGaAsP (or InAlGaAs/InAlAs or InAlGaAs/InP) material system should be used for the mirror stacks in order to achieve a lattice match to the InP substrate. The lattice matching between the substrate and the layers should be substantially close to ensure a true single crystal film or layer growth.
In the InP material based system, it is difficult to achieve a suitable monolithic DBR-based mirror structure having a reasonable thickness because of the insignificant difference in the refractive indices in this material system. As a result, many layers, or mirror pairs, are needed in order to achieve a useful reflectivity. Useful reflectivity may be 99.8 percent or greater. Numerous attempts have been made to address the problem of very thick mirror structures. One attempt included a wafer bonding technique in which a DBR mirror is grown on a separate substrate and bonded to the active region. This technique has had only limited success and also the interface defects density in the wafer fusion procedure may cause potential reliability problems. Other approaches to making satisfactory long wavelength VCSELs have been fraught with one problem or another. For instance, lattice matched InP based mirrors used for 1550 nm VCSELs may have a host of problems in growth, processing, and optical performance. The low index contrast of (or InAlGaAs) and InP (or InAlAs) tends to lead to a requirement of extremely thick (ten microns or thicker) DBRs of 45 or more mirror periods or layer pairs. The AlGaAsSb or AlGaPSb systems associated with an InP substrate may be difficult to grow by MOCVD; and for good contrast, may still require at least 25 mirror pairs to achieve adequate reflectivity for VCSEL operation. For some VCSEL structures, such as the long wavelength structures, current confinement is an important characteristic. Proton implantation and lateral oxidation have been developed and used for current confinement in vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (VCSELs) especially for GaAs-based VCSEts. For some VCSELs, however, proton implantation and lateral oxidation cannot be easily applicable due to either very thick top DBR stacks for proton implantation or lack of lattice-matched high aluminum containing material for oxidation. This appears to be the case of InP related materials for long wavelength VCSEL operation. For InP based material systems, since index contrasts are relatively small as compared to GaAs based counterparts, the DBR stacks tend to be much thicker to obtain reasonable reflectivity from the DBRs. Consequently, a huge amount of energy may be required for gain guide proton implantation of these stacks, which appears to be not practical. Such high energy may damage other parts of the VCSEL structure. Thus, lateral oxidation seems to be a necessary approach for a gain guide for current confinement and possibly optical confinement, and for device isolation. However, the aluminum content is significantly lower in materials lattice matched to InP substrates than those materials lattice matched to GaAs substrates, which makes lateral oxidation difficult. Thus, a solution to the difficulty of lateral oxidation in InP based structures is needed. The invention provides a solution.
The invention may involve a vertical cavity surface emitting laser-having an InP substrate, a first mirror situated on the substrate, an active region situated on the first mirror, a gain guide formed on the active region and a second mirror situated on the gain guide. The gain guide may be an oxidized layer in the vicinity of the bottom portion of the second mirror proximate to the active region.
A gain guide layer may be initially grown or deposited as a layer containing some aluminum, and then oxidized. In the InP based system, the aluminum content of an acceptable material for a layer in the mirror may be about 52 percent. In the GaAs based system such acceptable material would have about 97 to 98 percent of aluminum content. The GaAs based layer may be relatively easy to oxidize. The oxidation of such layer may be done laterally along the side of the device via a trench around the top mirror plus possibly the active region and bottom mirror, or vertical or other kinds of trenches inserted through a surface of the device. The oxidizable layer in the InP system may similarly be oxidized. However, because of the significantly lower aluminum content, that layer may be much more difficult to oxidize. The difficult process of lateral oxidation of the InP based oxidizable layer may be eased by intentional oxygen incorporation. The oxygen, a water vapor, or other fluid containing oxygen may be used an oxidizing or diffusing agent that is inserted into the oxidizing environment and/or layer containing aluminum to oxidize the latter. The term “fluid” may be a generic term which includes liquids and gases as species. For instance, water, air, and steam may be fluids.
Situated on bottom mirror 17, may be formed an active region or cavity 19. Region 19 may have between one and more than five quantum wells. The material for the active region may be InGaAs (or InAlGaAs with low Al content) for quantum wells and InAlGaAs with high Al content for barriers. On active region 19 may be formed an upper or top mirror 23. DBR mirror 23 may have the same structure of pairs 31 of layers 33 and 35 as that in bottom mirror 17.
Proton implantation may be applied at the lower part of mirror 23 to make a gain guide 21 to provide current guidance and confinement in VCSEL structure 13. A center portion on the top of mirror 23 may be masked with a material resistant to proton implantation. Then a proton implantation may be applied to the top of structure 13 resulting in an isolation 25. Since the indexes of refraction of each material of the pairs of layers are close to each other, then many more pairs 31 may be required to build the mirror with the needed 99.8 percent reflectivity. Consequently, top mirror is a quite thick epitaxial DBR. Thus, rather high energy is required to achieve proton implantation down far enough in mirror 23 to result in an effective isolation 25.
The mask may be removed from the central portion of top mirror 23. Another mask may be applied to the top mirror 23 with an opening for applying a contact metal 37 on the top of mirror 23. Structure 13 may be moved so the resultant contact metal 37 may be in the form of a ring. The mask may be removed after deposition for the contact metal 37. Another mask may be placed on a portion of the contact metal and a passivation layer 27 may be deposited on the top of structure 13. The mask may be removed and another mask may be formed on the center portion of passivation layer 27. A layer of contact metal may be applied on the masked top of structure 13. The mask from the center portion of passivation layer may be removed with the remaining contact metal resulting in a ring-like contact 29 connected to contact metal 37. Contact metal may be deposited on the bottom side of substrate 15 to result in a second contact 39 for VCSEL structure 13.
On mirror part 43, another mirror part 45 may be formed. Mirror parts 43 and 45 constitute upper DBR mirror 47. Mirror part 45 is a dielectric mirror stack (DBR) that may be like a mesa or an island situated on lower mirror part or portion 43 of upper mirror 47. Mirror stack 45 may have, as examples, 3 to 4 pairs of TiO2 and SiO2, 2 to 3 pairs of Si and A12O3, or 4 to 5 pairs of TiO2 and A12O3, respectively. The dielectric stack may cover the light aperture of VCSEL structure 50 and not block emitted light.
Formed around dielectric stack 45 may be a ring of contact metal as a first contact 46 for VCSEL structure 50. Contact 46 may be deposited in a manner similar to that of contact 37 for structure 13. A second contact metal may be deposited on the bottom of InP substrate 15 as a second contact 39 for VCSEL structure 50. A disadvantage of structure 50 is the process for making it is complicated by the making of stack 45 and related issues such as, for instance, stress in dielectric DBR stack 45.
A thing about structure 60 that is different from structure 13 is that one or two of the layers of a pair 31, near active region 19 in mirror 23, may have a high content of aluminum. Such layers or layer having a high content of aluminum may be designated as layer 51. Layer 51 may instead be a layer or layers between top mirror 23 and active region 19. In other words, this layer 51 is oxidizable and may be oxidized laterally from the layer's external edge or via a vertical or isolation trench under certain environmental conditions having, for example, oxygen or high water vapor and high temperature.
Contact metal 37 and passivation layer 27 are formed on the top of upper DBR mirror 23 of structure 60 in the same manner as it is formed for structure 13. An electrical contact 29, connected to contact metal 37, may be made in the same manner as that for structure 13. Structure 61 of
By the way, the temperature for oxidation may be about 350 to 400 degrees C. in the case of lateral oxidation for a GaAs-based VCSEL. The oxidation temperature may be about 500 degrees C. for an InP-based VCSEL. The latter high temperature would not necessarily affect the other layers.
To make a layer easily oxidize laterally, the layer should contain a high aluminum concentration. A nearly lattice matched AlGaAs (Al=0.97 to 0.98) layer may normally be used for an oxidation layer for GaAs based VCSELs. In the case of InP based VCSELs, however, a nearly lattice-matched high aluminum containing layer is not available. However, a low aluminum containing material, InAlAs (Al=0.52), having a sufficient lattice matching characteristic, may be used in oxidation layer 51 on an InP based VCSEL. Under ordinary conditions, the latent lateral oxidation of InAlAs may take an extended time at a high oxidation temperature, which could cause other problems, such as quantum well mixing and diffusion of a mobile dopant. The InAlAs of oxidizable layer 51 may change to AlxO1-x when being oxidized.
The present enhanced oxidation may be effected in the following way. First, there may be diffusion of an oxidizing agent (e.g., water vapor or oxygen) into layer 51 via an oxide/semiconductor interface or edge, or trench. Second, a chemical reaction (i.e., oxidation) may be initiated. A release of byproducts as a result of this oxidation or diffusion of the oxidizing agent may occur. But these byproducts may be absorbed, so generally there is little concern about them during the diffusion or oxidation. If diffusion of an oxidizing agent (i.e., O2 or H2O) is one of the rate controlling steps and oxidizing agents are already present in the layer, the lateral oxidation rate may be increased for a low Al-containing layer such as layer 51. Lateral oxidation rates may be small for InP system materials having aluminum.
Oxygen may be incorporated intentionally for enhanced lateral oxidation 48 of layer 51. Such oxygen incorporation may be carried out by with intentional oxygen doping of layer 51 with an oxygen-containing metalorganic dopant. Lowering the growth temperature of layer 51 may enable more oxygen to be put into that layer. This may make layer 51 oxidation a quicker process.
The proof of this enhanced oxidation process for low aluminum containing layer 51 may be shown by an oxidation sample that was grown after a metalorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOVCD) chamber was opened up for regular maintenance which permitted additional oxygen and water vapor to enter the chamber. It was previously known that for a certain period of time, the chamber was expected to have a certain amount residual oxygen and water vapor. A sample like layer 51 was laterally oxidized in an oxidation process in the chamber. A much faster oxidation rate (7 to 10 micron lateral oxidation) than expected of the sample was observed. The faster rate turned out to be due to a greater amount of oxygen and water vapor in the chamber than the residual amount. The oxygen level of this sample was investigated with SIMS (Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy) and the sample was revealed to contain a high oxygen level (greater than the 10E19 order). The normal oxygen level of such sample oxidized under previous chamber conditions would have been in about the 10E16–17 order. Thus, the increasing the amount of oxygen in the oxidization environment or oxidation chamber of the sample or layer 51 may increase lateral oxidation rate of that sample or layer. Further, doping layer 51 with oxygen or vapor also may increase lateral oxidation rate of that layer. With either approach, one may cause an enhancement of the lateral oxidation rate by intentional oxygen incorporation even after all of the residual oxygen in the chamber environment of the layer is gone. The oxygen may be introduced in various fluids such as water vapor or in dopants of one kind or another.
Oxygen or water may be allowed to enter or purposely be placed into film or layer 51 during the growth of structure 60. Generally, one may avoid vapor entering into the other layers during that growth. A pre-existing amount of water vapor or oxygen in layer 51 may aid in the increase of the oxidation rate of layer 51 when oxidized.
Structures 60, 61, 70 and 71 may instead have coplanar configurations 80 and 90, shown in
Besides the use of the invention for InP based systems, there may be reasons for increasing the lateral oxidization of the oxidizable layer in the GaAs based material system such as the need to lower the oxidization temperature or to speed up the oxidation of the confinement and/or isolation layer, or to protect other elements of the system or device.
Although the invention has been described with respect to at least one illustrative embodiment, many variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the present specification. It is therefore the intention that the appended claims be interpreted as broadly as possible in view of the prior art to include all such variations and modifications.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4317085 | Burnham et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4466694 | MacDonald | Aug 1984 | A |
4660207 | Svilans | Apr 1987 | A |
4675058 | Plaster | Jun 1987 | A |
4784722 | Liau et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4885592 | Kofol et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4901327 | Bradley | Feb 1990 | A |
4943970 | Bradley | Jul 1990 | A |
4956844 | Goodhue et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5031187 | Orenstein et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5052016 | Mahbobzadeh | Sep 1991 | A |
5056098 | Anthony et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5062115 | Thornton | Oct 1991 | A |
5068869 | Wang et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5079774 | Mendez et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5115441 | Kopf et al. | May 1992 | A |
5115442 | Lee et al. | May 1992 | A |
5117469 | Cheung et al. | May 1992 | A |
5140605 | Paoli et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5157537 | Rosenblatt et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5158908 | Blonder et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5212706 | Jain | May 1993 | A |
5216263 | Paoli | Jun 1993 | A |
5216680 | Magnusson et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5237581 | Asada et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5245622 | Jewell et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5258990 | Olbright et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5262360 | Holonyak, Jr. et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5285466 | Tabatabaie | Feb 1994 | A |
5293392 | Shieh et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5317170 | Paoli | May 1994 | A |
5317587 | Ackley et al. | May 1994 | A |
5325386 | Jewell et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5331654 | Jewell et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5337074 | Thornton | Aug 1994 | A |
5337183 | Rosenblatt et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5349599 | Larkins | Sep 1994 | A |
5351256 | Schneider et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5359447 | Hahn et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5359618 | Lebby et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5363397 | Collins et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5373520 | Shoji et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5373522 | Holonyak, Jr. et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5376580 | Kish et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5386426 | Stephens | Jan 1995 | A |
5390209 | Vakhshoori | Feb 1995 | A |
5396508 | Bour et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5404373 | Cheng | Apr 1995 | A |
5412678 | Treat et al. | May 1995 | A |
5412680 | Swirhum et al. | May 1995 | A |
5416044 | Chino et al. | May 1995 | A |
5428634 | Bryan et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5438584 | Paoli et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5446754 | Jewell et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5465263 | Bour et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475701 | Hibbs-Brenner | Dec 1995 | A |
5493577 | Choquette et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5497390 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5513202 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5530715 | Shieh et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5555255 | Kock et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5557626 | Grodzinski et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5561683 | Kwon | Oct 1996 | A |
5567980 | Holonyak, Jr. et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568498 | Nilsson | Oct 1996 | A |
5568499 | Lear | Oct 1996 | A |
5574738 | Morgan | Nov 1996 | A |
5581571 | Holonyak, Jr. et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586131 | Ono et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590145 | Nitta | Dec 1996 | A |
5598300 | Magnusson et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5606572 | Swirhun et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5625729 | Brown | Apr 1997 | A |
5642376 | Olbright et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5645462 | Banno et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646978 | Kem et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5648978 | Sakata | Jul 1997 | A |
5679963 | Klem et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5692083 | Bennett | Nov 1997 | A |
5696023 | Holonyak, Jr. et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699373 | Uchida et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5712188 | Chu et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5726805 | Kaushik et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727013 | Botez et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727014 | Wang et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5774487 | Morgan | Jun 1998 | A |
5778018 | Yoshikawa et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5781575 | Nilsson | Jul 1998 | A |
5784399 | Sun | Jul 1998 | A |
5790733 | Smith et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805624 | Yang et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5818066 | Duboz | Oct 1998 | A |
5828684 | Van de Walle | Oct 1998 | A |
5838705 | Shieh et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838715 | Corzine et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5892784 | Tan et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892787 | Tan et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5896408 | Corzine et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5901166 | Nitta et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903588 | Guenter et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903589 | Jewell | May 1999 | A |
5903590 | Hadley et al. | May 1999 | A |
5908408 | McGary et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5936266 | Holonyak, Jr. et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940422 | Johnson | Aug 1999 | A |
5953362 | Pamulapati et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5978401 | Morgan | Nov 1999 | A |
5978408 | Thornton | Nov 1999 | A |
5995531 | Gaw et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002705 | Thornton | Dec 1999 | A |
6008675 | Handa | Dec 1999 | A |
6014395 | Jewell | Jan 2000 | A |
6043104 | Uchida et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046065 | Goldstein et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052398 | Brillouet et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055262 | Cox et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6060743 | Sugiyama et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078601 | Smith | Jun 2000 | A |
6086263 | Selli et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6133590 | Ashley et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144682 | Sun | Nov 2000 | A |
6154480 | Magnusson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160834 | Scott | Dec 2000 | A |
6185241 | Sun | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191890 | Baets et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208681 | Thorton | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212312 | Grann et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6238944 | Floyd | May 2001 | B1 |
6269109 | Jewell | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6297068 | Thornton | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302596 | Cohen et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6339496 | Koley et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6369403 | Holonyak, Jr. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6372533 | Jayaraman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392257 | Ramdani et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6410941 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411638 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6427066 | Grube | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6455879 | Ashley et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459709 | Lo et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6459713 | Jewell | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6462360 | Higgins, Jr. et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6472694 | Wilson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477285 | Shanley | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487230 | Boucart et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487231 | Boucart et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490311 | Boucart et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493371 | Boucart et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493372 | Boucart et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493373 | Boucart et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496621 | Kathman et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498358 | Lach et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501973 | Foley et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6515308 | Kneissl et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535541 | Boucart et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6536959 | Kuhn et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542527 | Gopinath | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6542531 | Sirbu et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6567435 | Scott et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6845118 | Scott | Jan 2005 | B1 |
20010004414 | Kuhn et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020154675 | Deng et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030072526 | Kathman et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040151221 | Yamamoto et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4240706 | Jun 1994 | DE |
0288184 | Oct 1988 | EP |
0776076 | May 1997 | EP |
60123084 | Jan 1985 | JP |
02054981 | Feb 1990 | JP |
5299779 | Nov 1993 | JP |
WO 9857402 | Dec 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040264531 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |