Field of the Invention
Embodiments of the invention generally relate to oil well stimulation and compositions for the stimulation of hydrocarbon bearing, heavy oil containing formations, deep oil reservoirs, and tight oil reservoirs. More particularly, embodiments of the invention relate to enhanced oil recovery methods and compositions for stimulating a hydrocarbon-bearing, heavy oil containing formation, a deep oil reservoir, or a tight oil reservoir, whereby exothermic reactants are utilized to generate in-situ steam and nitrogen gas downhole in the formation or the reservoir as an enhanced oil recovery process.
Description of the Related Art
The recovery of unconventional hydrocarbons such as heavy oil is receiving great interest, as world energy demand increases along with global oil prices. Producing such high viscosity oil is complex and challenging, and usually requires chemical or thermal techniques.
One commonly employed technique for increasing the extraction of heavy oil from the oil reservoir is steam injection. Steam injection is considered an enhanced oil recovery process that uses thermal energy to stimulate the oil reservoir. Examples of conventional steam injection processes include, for example, cyclic steam stimulation and steam flooding.
Conventional cyclic steam stimulation includes three stages: injection, soaking. and production. Steam is first injected into the well for a specified amount of time to heat the oil in the surrounding reservoir to facilitate the flow of the oil. After injecting a specified amount of steam, the injected steam remains in the reservoir to “soak” for another specified amount of time (e.g., typically a few days). The “soaking” steam generates increased pressure in the reservoir, forcing oil to flow from the well. Subsequently, oil is produced from the well using artificial lift (e.g., mechanical extraction of the oil from the reservoir).
Steam flooding is another conventional steam injection process, whereby the heavy oil in the reservoir is heated to high temperatures to decrease the viscosity of the oil, causing the oil to more easily flow through the formation toward the producing wells. Conventional steam flooding relies on constructing a steam generating plant and injecting steam at a well head. Disadvantages of conventional steam flooding systems include high initial capital costs (e.g., associated with the steam generating plant), high operational cost, and heat loss due to distance from generators to downhole, which make conventional steam injection processes ineffective for recovering oil from deep oil reservoirs. Moreover, existing steam flooding systems are applicable for off-shore oil reservoirs, and are inapplicable for off-shore ones.
Because conventional steam injection processes have limited effect for stimulating hydrocarbons from deep heavy oil containing formations, off-shore formations or tight oil reservoirs with high operational cost, what is needed are enhanced oil recovery methods and compositions for the thermal recovery of hydrocarbons from deep heavy oil formations, off-shore, on-shore or from a tight oil reservoir, which require less initial capital costs and minimize the operational cost and heat loss in pipelines that are commonly present with conventional steam flooding processes.
Generally, embodiments of the invention provide methods and compositions for stimulating hydrocarbon production from hydrocarbon-bearing heavy oil or reservoir oil by generating in-situ steam and nitrogen gas downhole in a heavy oil formation, a deep oil reservoir, or a tight oil reservoir.
In particular, embodiments of the invention are directed to methods and compositions that generate in-situ steam and nitrogen gas downhole in a heavy oil formation, a deep oil reservoir, or a tight oil reservoir to improve oil mobility for enhancing oil production. For example, various embodiments of the invention provide methods for injecting exothermic-reaction components that react downhole in the heavy oil formation, the deep oil reservoir, or the tight oil reservoir to generate the in-situ steam (e.g., heat) and nitrogen gas to recover deep heavy oil and/or hydrocarbons from the formation and reservoirs that conventional steam injection processes and compositions are unable to recover.
According to certain embodiments of the invention, as steam is generated downhole, heat delivery efficiency is maximized and heat loss due to under and/or overburdens is minimized compared to conventional steam injection processes and compositions. Furthermore, various embodiments of the invention provide a low cost method for delivering thermal energy to the formation and reservoirs to increase formation and reservoir temperature, respectively, improve oil mobility, and achieve high heavy oil and hydrocarbon recovery.
Accordingly, in accordance with one embodiment, there is provided an enhanced oil recovery method for recovery of oil from a heavy oil formation, a deep oil reservoir, or a tight oil reservoir. The enhanced oil recovery method includes injecting, into one of the formation and the reservoir, an aqueous composition including an ammonium containing compound and a nitrite containing compound. The method further includes injecting, into the one of the formation and the reservoir, an activator. The activator initiates a reaction between the ammonium containing compound and the nitrite containing compound, such that the reaction generates steam and nitrogen gas, increasing localized pressure and improving oil mobility, in the one of the formation and the reservoir, thereby enhancing oil recovery from the one of the formation and the reservoir.
In accordance with another embodiment, there is provided an oil well stimulation composition, which includes an ammonium containing compound, a nitrite containing compound, and an activator. The activator initiates a reaction between the ammonium containing compound and the nitrite containing compound, such that the reaction generates steam and nitrogen gas, increasing localized pressure and improving oil mobility, in the one of the formation and the reservoir, thereby enhancing oil recovery from the one of the formation and the reservoir.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the invention are better understood with regard to the following Detailed Description, appended Claims, and accompanying Figures. It is to be noted, however, that the Figures illustrate only various embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of the invention's scope as it may include other effective embodiments as well.
The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, which illustrate embodiments of the invention. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the illustrated embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout. Prime notation, if used, indicates similar elements in alternative embodiments.
As generally mentioned above, embodiments of the invention relate to the stimulation of hydrocarbon-bearing, heavy oil containing formations, deep oil reservoirs, and tight oil reservoirs to enhance oil production. Various embodiments of the invention address problems associated with conventional steam injection processes, by providing methods and compositions that utilize exothermic-reaction components to generate steam and nitrogen gas downhole in a formation or reservoir to enhance oil production, without the initial capital costs and injected heat loss at the pipelines that is commonly present with conventional steam injection processes. The methods and compositions, according to various embodiments of the invention, can greatly increase the production rate of oil from heavy oil containing formations, deep oil reservoirs, and tight oil reservoirs (i.e., low permeability formations and reservoirs), thus improving the economics of the development thereof.
As shown in
The method further includes injecting, at 110, into the formation or the reservoir, up to 5 vol % (of the total volume) of a 0.1 to 1M activator. The activator initiates a reaction, at 120, between the ammonium containing compound and the nitrite containing compound, such that the reaction generates steam and nitrogen gas downhole in the formation or the reservoir for increasing the localized pressure in the formation or the reservoir, and improving mobility of oil, at 130, in the formation or the reservoir, thereby enhancing recovery of the oil from the formation or the reservoir. In accordance with at least one embodiment, the reservoir temperature is less than or equal to 150° F. (65.5556° C.) (i.e., a temperature reservoir to activate the oxidation-reduction reaction using the activator).
The methods and composition, in accordance with certain embodiments, generate and release two types of energy—kinetic energy and thermal energy, which is a result of the exothermic nature of the oxidation-reduction reaction. In accordance with one embodiment, an aqueous solution including an ammonium containing compound, for example, ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) and a nitrite containing compound, for example, sodium nitrate (NaNO2), are mixed with an injection of an activator, for example, an acid (H+), heat, or water (H+), whereby nitrogen gas (N2), sodium chloride (NaCl), water, and heat are the byproducts (see Equation [1]). In-situ steam is generated from the heat produced by the oxidation-reduction reaction, and in conjunction with the nitrogen gas, increases the localized pressure in the formation or the reservoir, thereby enhancing oil mobility in the formation or the reservoir and hydrocarbon recovery therefrom.
For each of the embodiments described herein, exemplary ammonium containing compounds include, for example, ammonium chloride, ammonium bromide, ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulfate, ammonium carbonate, and ammonium hydroxide.
For each of the embodiments described herein, exemplary nitrite containing compounds include, for example, sodium nitrite, potassium nitrite, sodium hypochlorite.
For each of the embodiments described herein, exemplary activators include, for example, weak acids, such as acetic acid, strong acids, such as hydrochloric acid, and dilute strong acids. In general, any compound that is capable of releasing an acidic hydrogen can be used as an activator. In certain preferred embodiments, acetic acid is used as the activator. In certain embodiments, a 0.1 M solution of acetic acid having a concentration of about 0.5 vol % (of the total volume) is utilized. In certain embodiments, dilute strong acids, such as dilute HC1, is utilized to activate the oxidation-reduction reaction, with or without the addition of a buffer. One main advantage of the utilization of dilute strong acids is the increased control over the reaction.
In various embodiments, the temperature within the formation or the reservoir is sufficient to serve as the activator or co-activator (along with the acid or other hydrogen-releasing compound) to activate the reaction between the components of the aqueous composition, while in other embodiments additional amounts of heat are supplied to the formation or the reservoir. For example, in certain embodiments, the temperature within the formation or the reservoir is about 90° C. or higher, alternatively at least about 70° C., and alternatively at least about 60° C. In some embodiments, the temperature within the formation or the reservoir is between about 60 to 70° C., and alternatively between 65° C. to 80° C. In a preferred embodiment, the temperature in the formation or the reservoir is at least 45° C., the temperature at which the oxidation-reaction in the formation or the reservoir is activated.
As noted above, in certain embodiments where the temperature of the formation or the reservoir is used to activate or initiate the oxidation-reduction reaction, a buffer is employed, such that the acidic hydrogen ions are slowly released. The buffer includes ethyl acetate, as a non-limiting example. In accordance with certain embodiments, the buffer is employed in the formation or the reservoir at a temperature of less than 75° C.
Exemplary combinations of reactants for the aqueous composition include, for example, urea and sodium hypochlorite, urea and sodium nitrite, ammonium hydroxide and sodium hypochlorite, ammonium chloride and sodium nitrite, and sodium nitrite and ammonium nitrate.
In certain embodiments, the aqueous composition includes equimolar amounts of the ammonium containing compound and the nitrite containing compound when they are supplied to the formation or the reservoir to ensure complete reaction of both components. In alternate embodiments, up to about a 5% excess of either component can be employed; however, it is generally preferred that equimolar amounts are employed. Thus, in certain embodiments, the ammonium containing compound and the nitrite containing compound are provided in a ratio ranging from between about 1.1:1 to 1:1.1, alternatively between about 1.05:1 and 1:1.05, and alternatively about 1:1.
In certain embodiments, the reaction between the ammonium containing compound and the nitrite containing compound in the presence of the activator results in the local generation of about 60 L of nitrogen gas per one liter of reactants and about 225 Kcal (942.03 kJ) of heat per one liter of reactants. In certain embodiments, the reaction of the ammonium containing compound and the nitrite containing compound in the presence of the activator results in the generation of at least about 50 Kcal (209.34 kJ) of heat per one liter of reactants, alternatively at least about 100 Kcal (418.68 kJ) of heat per one liter of reactants, alternatively at least about 150 Kcal (628.02 kJ) of heat per one liter of reactants, and alternatively at least about 200 Kcal (837.36 kJ) of heat per one liter of reactants.
In various embodiments, the heat generated from the oxidation-reduction reaction generates at least about 15 times the required heat to vaporize water downhole in the formation or the reservoir. For example, in accordance with certain embodiments, the downhole temperature is increased by at least about 50° C., alternatively by at least about 75° C., and alternatively by at least about 100° C.
In certain embodiments, the method further includes injecting 0.1 to 1M of a non-acidic well stimulation fluid, for example, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), which prevents a premature reaction between the ammonium containing compound and the nitrite containing compound, thereby allowing the reactants to reach the formation or the reservoir before the high temperatures therewithin cause the reaction between the components of the aqueous composition.
The in-situ generation of heat and nitrogen gas (and resulting increase in pressure within the formation at the reaction site), increases the permeability of certain oil formations and reservoirs. For example, the heat and gas that are generated by the oxidation-reduction reaction cause tensile and thermal fractures within the hydraulically induced and within the existing fractures in the formation. It is understood that the generation of microfractures within the formation or the reservoir may depend on the type of formation or reservoir being treated. This, coupled with the administration of the non-acidic well stimulation fluid described above, results in the increased production of oil recovery from the formation or the reservoir as both the aqueous composition and the non-acidic well stimulation fluid act on the formation or the reservoir in a manner that results in increased permeability.
In certain embodiments, the ammonium containing compound and the nitrite containing compound are injected into the formation or the reservoir approximately 5 minutes before the injection of the non-acidic well stimulation fluid, alternatively approximately 10 minutes before the injection of the non-acidic well stimulation fluid, and alternatively approximately 15 minutes before the injection of the non-acidic well stimulation fluid.
In certain embodiments, the inventive aqueous composition includes the ammonium containing compound and the nitrite containing compound, one of which is optionally encapsulated. The water and/or the heat of the formation or the reservoir facilitates the erosion of the encapsulated component, such that the reaction between the ammonium containing compound and the nitrite containing compound is delayed, allowing the aqueous composition to migrate and seep into the fractures within the formation or the reservoir.
In certain embodiments, the ammonium containing compound or the nitrite containing compound is optionally encapsulated with a binder to form a solid matrix with the component. Exemplary encapsulating binders include, for example, 55-carboxymethyl cellulose and xanthan. Exemplary binders are preferably reactive with water or the non-acidic well stimulation fluid, and/or heat, such that upon contact with the non-acidic well stimulation fluid or water, or upon heating, the binder erodes or dissolves, allowing the reactants of the aqueous composition to react with one another downhole in the formation or the reservoir.
In certain embodiments, the ammonium containing compound or the nitrite containing compound is optionally encapsulated with a polymer, for example, a hydrated polymer. Exemplary polymers include, for example, guar, chitosan and polyvinyl alcohol. In certain embodiments, the aqueous composition optionally includes a buffer.
Example of an Estimation of Generated Heat Downhole:
These calculations are based around assumptions set out on pump flow rate in the paper by Marques, et al. “A New Technique to Troubleshoot Gas Hydrates Buildup Problems in Subsea Christmas Trees” SPE77572.
Advantageously, in contrast to some conventional stimulation methods, the methods and compositions described herein do not produce any damaging by-products as a result of the in-situ reaction. For example, the acids utilized as activators are typically consumed by the oxidation-reduction reaction and are only present in relatively small quantities, such that there is little or no residual acid remaining that may cause environmental concerns. As a result, following the stimulation procedure, no clean-up procedure is required.
The methods and compositions discussed herein solve several problems that are frequently encountered during the construction of commercial wells in deep oil and tight oil reservoirs.
First, problems associated with damage to the formation caused by current hydraulic fracturing methods can be eliminated. For example, the methods and compositions described herein, advantageously help to eliminate fracturing-fluid filtrate that can be locked near a recently created fracture surface by creating many tensile fractures near the fracture surface such that any filtrate readily flows through these fractures toward the well.
Second, the methods and compositions provided herein, advantageously enhance production over traditional hydraulic fracturing methods through the creation of microfractures, which provide additional conductivity to the near fracture surface, such that it provides new channels for gas to flow toward the created fracture. The additional reservoir volume contacting the well contributes significantly to the overall flow efficiency of the drainage area being affected by the induced fracture.
Finally, current hydraulic fracturing techniques that require many fracturing stages to create sufficient reservoir volume contact within the well to be commercial are eliminated as a result of the production of microfractures due to the gas and heat that are produced. By reducing the number of required fracturing stages for production, the present stimulation treatment described herein is both more cost effective and completed more quickly, thereby providing viable economical options for the stimulation of low producing wells.
The present invention may suitably comprise, consist or consist essentially of the elements disclosed and may be practiced in the absence of an element not disclosed. For example, it can be recognized by those skilled in the art that certain steps can be combined into a single step.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs.
The singular forms “an,” and “the” include plural referents, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
As used herein and in the appended claims, the words “comprise,” “has,” and “include” and all grammatical variations thereof are each intended to have an open, non-limiting meaning that does not exclude additional elements or steps.
“Optionally” means that the subsequently described event or circumstances may or may not occur. The description includes instances where the event or circumstance occurs and instances where it does not occur.
Ranges may be expressed herein as from about one particular value, and/or to about another particular value. When such a range is expressed, it is to be understood that another embodiment is from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value, along with all combinations within said range.
Although the present invention has been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions, and alterations can be made hereupon without departing from the principle and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention should be determined by the following claims and their appropriate legal equivalents.
This application is related to, and claims priority to, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/652,359, filed on May 29, 2012, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
127355 | Lester | May 1872 | A |
1819055 | Al et al. | Aug 1931 | A |
1990969 | Wilson | Feb 1935 | A |
2094479 | Vandergrift | Sep 1937 | A |
2288556 | Vollmer | Jun 1942 | A |
2466674 | Mullady | Apr 1949 | A |
2606813 | Kahr | Aug 1952 | A |
2699213 | Cardwell et al. | Jan 1955 | A |
2885004 | Perry | May 1959 | A |
3025911 | Bergman | Mar 1962 | A |
3354954 | Buxton | Nov 1967 | A |
3385360 | Smith | May 1968 | A |
3405761 | Parker | Oct 1968 | A |
3476183 | Haynes, Jr. et al. | Nov 1969 | A |
3483923 | Darley | Dec 1969 | A |
3543856 | Knox et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3568772 | Gogarty et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3576596 | Kranc et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3638727 | Allen | Feb 1972 | A |
3707192 | Goins, Jr. et al. | Dec 1972 | A |
3712380 | Caffey | Jan 1973 | A |
3719228 | Carcia | Mar 1973 | A |
3760881 | Kiel | Sep 1973 | A |
3828854 | Templeton et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3864451 | Lee et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
4056146 | Hall | Nov 1977 | A |
4085799 | Bousaid et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4136739 | Salathiel et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4158042 | Deutschman | Jun 1979 | A |
4178993 | Richardson et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4210628 | Ninomiya et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4219083 | Richardson et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4232740 | Park | Nov 1980 | A |
4232741 | Richardson et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4291765 | Gilchrist et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4330037 | Richardson et al. | May 1982 | A |
4399868 | Richardson et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4410041 | Davies et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4414118 | Murphey | Nov 1983 | A |
4454918 | Richardson et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4475595 | Watkins et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4482016 | Richardson | Nov 1984 | A |
4485007 | Tam et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4491180 | Brown et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4518040 | Middleton | May 1985 | A |
4572297 | Thigpen, Jr. et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4615391 | Garthoffner | Oct 1986 | A |
4703803 | Blumer | Nov 1987 | A |
4842073 | Himes et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4846277 | Khalil | Jul 1989 | A |
4865826 | Carnell et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4898750 | Friedman et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4919209 | King | Apr 1990 | A |
5082058 | Blumer | Jan 1992 | A |
5087350 | Paris-Marcano | Feb 1992 | A |
5152906 | Aften et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5183581 | Khalil et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5197544 | Himes | Mar 1993 | A |
5209295 | Campos et al. | May 1993 | A |
5342530 | Aften et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5358565 | Shu | Oct 1994 | A |
5375660 | Wehunt | Dec 1994 | A |
5411094 | Northrop | May 1995 | A |
5607016 | Butler | Mar 1997 | A |
5639313 | Khalil | Jun 1997 | A |
5958224 | Ho et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6035933 | Khalil et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6277271 | Kocal | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6500219 | Gunnerman | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6662874 | Surjaatmadja et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6722434 | Reddy et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6827845 | Gong et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6881325 | Morris et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6992048 | Reddy et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7029639 | Yasutake et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7059414 | Rae et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7066260 | Sullivan et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7153434 | Dennis | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7328746 | Al-Taq et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7540328 | Brown et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7589050 | Frenier et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7624743 | Sarkar et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7686084 | Reddy et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7779915 | Hutchins et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7947629 | Fuller | May 2011 | B2 |
8096361 | Willberg | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8216344 | Degenstein et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8282715 | Degenstein et al. | Oct 2012 | B1 |
8962536 | Winslow et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
20030092581 | Crews | May 2003 | A1 |
20030221831 | Reddy et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050000694 | Dalrymple et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050215439 | Blair | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060144591 | Gonzalez et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060154814 | Zanibelli et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080066784 | Sarkar et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080121395 | Reddy | May 2008 | A1 |
20080190607 | Minnich et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080190610 | Barmatov et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080289828 | Hutchins et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080318812 | Kakadjian, Sr. et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090098467 | Lowe et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100056399 | Berkland et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100170453 | Betzer-Zilevitch | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100288499 | Al-Dhafeeri et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110030958 | Fedorov et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110203797 | Alexandrov et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110220360 | Lindvig et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120211225 | Kostrov et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130123151 | Crews | May 2013 | A1 |
20130126169 | Al-Nakhli et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130126175 | Al-Mulhem et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130180720 | Al-Dahlan et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140090839 | Al-Nakhli et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140144632 | Zavolzhski et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101323780 | Nov 1993 | CN |
101839123 | Sep 2010 | CN |
0654582 | May 1995 | EP |
0909873 | Apr 1999 | EP |
2001019984 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2005015533 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2100583 | Dec 1997 | RU |
2126084 | Feb 1999 | RU |
2194156 | Dec 2002 | RU |
1677260 | Sep 1991 | SU |
0037777 | Jun 2000 | WO |
2006131895 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007015391 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2008032067 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2009009370 | Jan 2009 | WO |
2009070561 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2010046618 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010047612 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2012012224 | Jan 2012 | WO |
2012025150 | Mar 2012 | WO |
2012082402 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2013078306 | May 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Marques et al. “A New Techique to Solve Gas Hydrate Problems in Subsea Christmas Trees” 2002 SPE Annual Techical Conference and Exhibition, SPE 77572, San Antonio, Texas, Sep. 29-Oct. 2, 2002, pp. 253-258. |
Al-Nakhli, Chemically Induced Pressure Pulse to Increase Stimulated Reservoir Volume in Unconventional Reservoirs, Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Denver Co, Aug. 25-27, 2014. |
Ashton, J.P., et al., “In-Situ Heat System Stimulates Paraffinic-Crude Producers in Gulf of Mexico,” SPE 15660, SPE Production Engineering, May 1989, pp. 157-160, vol. 4, No. 2, Society of Petroleum Engineers. |
Cheng Yun-Fu, Preparation and Field Uses of Heat Generating Hydrofracturing Fluids, Oilfield Chemistry Research Institute of Drilling and Production, Dagang Oil Fields, Dagang Oilfield Group Co., Ltd vol. 14, No. pp. 24-27, Mar. 25, 1997. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 14/689,901, filed Apr. 17, 2015, titled “Method for Enhanced Fracture Clenup Using Redoxx Treatment”. |
Database WPI, Week 201115, XP-002693470, Thomson Scientific, London, GB, C:\EPOPROGS\SEA\.\..\..\epodata\sea\eplogf\internal.log. |
European Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 2, 2013, for related European Patent Application 13174172. |
Khalil, C.N., et al., “Detection of Formation Damage Associated to Paraffin in Reservoirs of the Reconcavo Baiano, Brazil,” SPE 37238, Int'l Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry held in Houston, TX, Feb. 18-21, 1997, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc. |
Kiryukhin, et al., Thermal-Hydrodynamic Modeling of Laboratory Tests on the Interaction of NaNO3—NaOH Fluids with Sandstone Rock at a Deep Radionuclide Repository Site, pp. 1-20, Russia. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration; dated Mar. 18, 2013; International Appln No. PCT/US2013/021961; Int'l File Date: Jan. 17, 2013. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration; dated Mar. 5, 2013; International Appln No. PCT/US2012/066249; Int'l File Date: Nov. 21, 2012. |
Schlumberger, Systems, Sand Control Pumping, pp. 37-70, USA, available at www.slb.com/˜/media/files/sand—control/.../scps—03—systems.ashx. Feb. 27, 2012. |
Related U.S. Appl. No. 14/689,874, filed Apr. 17, 2015, titled “Chemically-Induced Pulsed Fracturing Method”. |
PCT International Search Report and the written opinion dated Apr. 8, 2014; International Application No. PCT/US2013/043076; International filing date May 29, 2013. |
Isao Mochida et al., “Removal of SOx and NOx over activated carbon fibers,” Carbon, vol. 38, 2000, pp. 227-239. |
Yosuke Sano et al., “Adsorptive removal of Sulfur and nitrogen species from a straight run gas oil over activated carbons for its deep hydrodesulfurization,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 49, 2004, pp. 219-225. |
E. Raymundo-Pinero et al., “Temperature programmed desorption study on the mechanism of SO2 oxidation by activated carbon and activated carbon fibres,” Carbon, vol. 39, 2001, pp. 231-242. |
N. Shirahama et al., “Mechanistic study on adsorption and reduction of NO2 over activated carbon fibers,” Carbon, vol. 40, 2002, pp. 2605-2611. |
Isao Mochida et al., “Kinetic study of the continuous removal of SOx on polyacrylonitrile-based activated carbon fibres,” Fuel, vol. 76, No. 6, 1997, pp. 533-536. |
Satoru Murata et al., “A Novel Oxidative Desulfurization System for Diesel Fuels with Molecular Oxygen in the Presence of Cobalt Catalysts and Aldehydes,” Energy & Fuels vol. 18, No. 1, 2004, pp. 116-121. |
Kazumasa Yazu et al., “Immobilized Tungstophosphoric Acid-catalyzed Oxidative Desulfurization of Diesel Oil with Hydrogen Peroxide,” Journal of Japan Petroleum Institute, vol. 46, No. 6, 2003, pp. 379-382. |
Antonio Chica et al., “Catalytic oxidative desulfurization (ODS) of diesel fuel on a continuous fixed-bed reactor,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 242, 2006, pp. 299-308. |
Jeyagowry T. Sampanthar et al., “A novel oxidative desulfurization process to remove refractory sulfur compounds from diesel fuel,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 63, 2006, pp. 85-93. |
Shujiro Otsuki et al., “Oxidative Desulfurization of Light Gas Oil and Vacuum Gas Oil by Oxidation and Solvent Extraction,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 14, No. 6, 2000, pp. 1232-1239. |
Kazumasa Yazu et al., “Oxidative Desulfurization of Diesel Oil with Hydrogen Peroxide in the Presence of Acid Catalyst in Diesel Oil/Acetic Acid Biphase System,” Chemistry Letters vol. 33, No. 10, 2004, pp. 1306-1307. |
Paolo De Filippis et al., “Oxidative Desulfurization: Oxidation Reactivity of Sulfur Compounds in Different Organic Matrixes,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 17, No. 6, 2003, pp. 1452-1455. |
Mure Te et al., “Oxidation reactivities of dibenzothiophenes in polyoxometalate/H2O2 and formic acid/H2O2 systems,” Applied Catalysis A: General 219, 2001, pp. 267-280. |
Anning Zhou et al., “Deep Desulfurization of Diesel Fuels by Selective Adsorption with Activated Carbons,” Prepr. Pap.-Am. Chem. 2004, 49 (3), pp. 329-332. |
Isao Mochida et al., “Adosprtion and Adsorbed Species of SO2 during Its Oxidative Removal over Pitch-Based Activated Carbon Fibers,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 13, No. 2, 1999, pp. 369-373. |
Yosuke Sano et al., “Two-step adsorption process for deep desulfurization of diesel oil,” Science Direct, Fuel 84, 2005, pp. 903-910. |
Yosuke Sano et al., “Selection and Further Activation of Activated Carbons for Removal of Nitrogen Species in Gas Oil as a Pretreatment for Its Deep Hydrodesulfurization,” Energy & Fuels, vol. 18, pp. 644-651. |
Xiang Xao et al., “Adsorption and reduction of NO2 over activated carbon at low temperature,” Fuel Processing Technology 92, 2011, pp. 139-146. |
Examination Report issued in related European Patent Application No. 08857250.8, dated Jun. 28, 2011, 13 pages. |
Khalil et al., “Improving Matrix Acidizing with Nitrogen and Heat in-Situ Generation”, SPE Latin American Petroleum Engineering Conference Rio de Janeiro, 1990, pp. 1-7, SPE 21113. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140090839 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61652359 | May 2012 | US |