Enhanced service levels for call-processing services

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8929258
  • Patent Number
    8,929,258
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, February 13, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 6, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
Service levels for call-processing are enhanced based on the subscriber status of at least one of the calling party and the called party. In one example, a calling party (caller) places a call to a called party (recipient). At least one of the parties subscribes to a call-processing service and the call normally would be processed according to a predetermined service level. However, the service level is enhanced in response to a subscriber status for at least one of the parties, and the call is processed according to the enhanced service level.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates to providing enhanced service levels for call-processing services, for example during calls between subscribers to the call-processing service.


2. Description of the Related Art


With recent advances in telecommunications technology, service providers are providing more and more complex call-processing services to their subscribers. For example, call-processing services that are available to residential phone subscribers can include answering machine service, caller ID, call waiting, call forwarding, call blocking, and three-way calling, to name just a few. Furthermore, the advent of call handling and call-processing by technologies other than the public switched telephone network (PSTN) has enabled additional call-processing services. Internet answering machine, Internet call waiting, fax-to-email, and voice over IP are just a few examples.


Providers of these call-processing services typically generate revenue by selling these services. The more services that subscribers buy; the more revenue is generated for the service provider. For convenience, the bundle of services purchased by a subscriber shall be referred to as the subscriber's service level. The service level for different subscribers can differ not only in which services are subscribed to, but also the quality of the particular service. As an example of the former, one subscriber might purchase Internet answering machine and fax-to-email, whereas another only purchases Internet answering machine. As an example of the latter, one subscriber might purchase Internet answering machine with a voice mailbox size of 10 minutes and maximum length of 30 seconds per voice mail, and another might purchase Internet answering machine with a voice mailbox size of 30 minutes and maximum voice mail length of 60 seconds.


In order to generate more revenue, service providers generally desire to enroll new subscribers and/or upgrade the service levels for existing subscribers. One way that service providers attempt to do this is by advertising. Advertising campaigns announcing the roll out of new services, attempts to generate media coverage or buzz for certain services, and ad placements in traditional media are all attempts to obtain new subscribers and/or to persuade existing subscribers to upgrade their service levels. However, advertising can be expensive and its effectiveness is not always apparent.


When multiple service providers offer similar services, service providers often will also want to differentiate subscription to their service from subscription to the other services. Service providers will want to somehow make their subscriptions “sticky” in order to prevent subscribers from switching to other service providers. In recent years, some telecommunications service providers have introduced billing plans that are favorable to their subscribers. For example, T-Mobile offers a wireless service where there is no per-minute charge if the calling party and the called party both subscribe to T-Mobile. However, although the pricing depends on whether both parties subscribe to T-Mobile, the actual service level does not.


Adding to these impediments, subscribers may not realize that they want a service until they actually try it. For example, a subscriber may believe he does not need fax-to-email because he does not receive that many faxes and therefore does not need email notification and/or email delivery of the faxes. He may be content to wait until he returns to the office to pick up any faxes sent to him. However, once he tries fax-to-email, he may find that the service is actually very useful to him, for example perhaps because the email-based fax delivery service is more secure or perhaps because he receives more faxes due to the convenience of the service. Service providers have offered free or reduced rate trial periods where subscribers can try new services. However, this still requires the subscriber to take the initiative of signing up for the trial period. It can also require significant resources from the service provider just to set up and administer the trial.


Thus, there is a need for new approaches to call-processing services that provide greater value to subscribers who sign up for higher service levels. There is also a need for new approaches to enroll new subscribers and to encourage existing subscribers to upgrade their service levels.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention overcomes the limitations of the prior art by enhancing service levels based on the subscriber status of at least one of the calling party and the called party. In one example, a calling party (the caller) places a call to a called party (the recipient). At least one of the parties subscribes to a call-processing service and the call normally would be processed according to a predetermined service level. However, the service level is enhanced in response to a subscriber status for at least one of the parties, and the call is processed according to the enhanced service level.


The determination of whether to enhance the service level can be decided in many different ways. For example, enhancement can be determined based on the caller's and/or the recipient's service level. In one approach, the higher service level of the two parties is used, assuming both parties are subscribers. In another approach, additional enhancements are made for subscribers calling other subscribers or for subscribing to higher service levels. In another approach, service levels are enhanced depending on whether the party(s) have somehow been determined to be “important,” for example by being listed in a subscriber's address book.


Different types of enhancement are also possible. For answering machine services, the length of the voice mail message can be increased, the recipient's personal greeting could be played instead of a default greeting, or the number of voice mail editing options could be increased, to name just a few. For call waiting or call notification type services, call notification can be delivered more quickly or with higher priority or in real-time, or call notification can include displaying the caller's name and/or caller ID. In addition, the recipient can be enabled to accept the incoming call, the maximum length for the resulting call connection can be increased, or the call or the voice mail can be streamed to the recipient or delivered by email or other electronic means.


In one architecture for implementing service level enhancement, a call-processing system is connected to the public switched telephone network (PSTN) and to the Internet. The call is switched by the PSTN to the call-processing system. For example, the call may be call forwarded from the recipient's phone line when it is busy. The call-processing system determines whether service level enhancements are in order and then processes the call according to the enhanced service level. The call-processing system provides call notification, call streaming and other services to the recipient via the Internet (e.g., to the recipient's computer).


Other aspects of the invention include other methods, devices and systems corresponding to the above.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention has other advantages and features which will be more readily apparent from the following detailed description of the invention and the appended claims, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a telecommunications system suitable for use with the invention.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of another telecommunications system according to the invention.



FIG. 3 is a composite flow diagram illustrating different aspects of operation of the system in FIG. 2.



FIG. 4 is a block diagram of one implementation of the system depicted in FIG. 3.



FIG. 5 is a block diagram showing further details of the call-processing system shown in FIG. 4.



FIG. 6 is a call flow diagram illustrating an example function implemented by the system depicted in FIGS. 4 and 5.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a telecommunications system suitable for use with the invention. In this figure, a calling party 2 (or caller) places a call to the called party 10 (or recipient) via a communications network 5. At least one of the two parties 2, 10 subscribes to a call-processing service, which is handled by call-processing system 24. In this diagram, the call-processing system 24 is shown separate from the communications network 5 for clarity. Depending on the application, some or all of the call-processing system 24 may be implemented within the communications network 5 and/or devices operated by either party 2, 10.


The system operates as follows. The call placed by the caller 2 is received, in this case by the call-processing system 24. Normally, call-processing (which includes processing of voice calls as well as fax calls) would be applied according to a predetermined service level, typically defined by the subscriber's contract. However, in certain situations depending on the subscriber status of the party(s), the service level will be enhanced and the call will be processed according to the enhanced service level.


As an example, assume that the recipient 10 subscribes to an Internet answering machine service. This service takes messages and then allows retrieval of the messages via the Internet. Thus, a caller 2 typically will leave a message for the recipient and then hang up. Now also assume that a specific caller 2 also subscribes to the Internet answering machine service but at a higher service level that also includes an Internet call connection service. The call connection service allows the subscriber to receive calls on his computer via the Internet. Normally, the recipient 10 would not have this option since he has not subscribed to this service. However, since the caller 2 has subscribed, the recipient's service level is enhanced for this call and the recipient 10 is given the option of taking the call on his computer.


This approach to enhancing service levels has many benefits. First, it can be a good way to offer free trials of services. Second, it can increase the value of higher service levels. As a final example, it can increase word of mouth marketing for services. If the recipient 10 is curious or has questions about the Internet call connection service, he can immediately ask the caller 2 who is a regular subscriber to the service. One advantage of dynamic enhancement of service level is that the added value received by both the caller and the recipient preferably should cause both parties to promote the service to other non-subscribers, thereby reducing subscriber chum and improving growth of the subscriber base. In addition, the caller 2 becomes a promoter of a higher level of service on behalf of the service provider.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a more specific example. Two networks are shown in FIG. 2: a public telephone network 4 and a data communications network 6. Examples of the public telephone network 4 include the PSTN, Voice over IP (VoIP) networks, and wireless networks. Examples of data communications network 6 include the Internet, virtual private data networks, and Wide Area Networks (WANs). The data communications network 6 may carry information besides just data. For example, it may carry both voice and data simultaneously.


A caller 2 is connected to the public telephone network 4 (e.g., by a phone or fax machine) and a recipient 10 is connected to the data communications network 6 (e.g., by a computer or other data device). A call-processing system 24 is connected to both networks 4, 6. The connections can be made either directly or indirectly. For recipient 10, examples of data devices include computers, Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs), and devices that combine both voice and data (e.g., a Handspring Treo). The data device can be connected to the data communications network 6 by any means, including a dial-up connection, a broadband connection (e.g., DSL, cable or direct fiber), a direct connection to the core of the data communications network 6, or wireless access. The connections can be either permanent or temporary. In addition, although the call-processing system 24 shown in FIG. 2 is depicted as a single box, it should be understood that parts of the call-processing system 24 may be distributed among the different devices 2, 10 and networks 4, 6.


In FIG. 2, when a caller 2 places a call to the recipient 10, the call is intercepted, received and handled by the call-processing system 24. For example, the call may be forwarded from the recipient's phone number to a phone number for the call-processing system 24, including Call Forward on Busy (the call is forwarded when the recipient's phone number is busy), Call Forward All (forward all calls regardless of the state of the recipient's phone number), and Call Forward No Answer (forward the call if the recipient's phone number rings but is not answered). Alternately, the recipient's phone number may terminate at the call-processing system 24 so that the call is routed directly to the can-processing system. For example, the recipient may be assigned a local phone number that terminates at the call-processing system 24. If the recipient already has a phone number, it can be local-number ported—that is, ported from the local phone carrier to the call-processing system 24, so that calls terminate directly at the call-processing system.



FIG. 3 is a composite flow diagram that shows some of the different call-processing options that can be implemented with the invention. Different call-processing systems 24 can implement the different features shown in FIG. 3. The recipient 10 is assumed to be a subscriber for an Internet call waiting service provided by the call-processing system 24. As such, the call-processing system 24 has default rules for processing calls destined for recipient 10. Upon receiving 52 a call, the default is for the call-processing system 24 to handle the call according to these default rules. In this example, the default is for the call-processing system 24 to automatically answer the call, send 62 a notification to the recipient 10 and record 62 a voice mail message.


Before executing the default rules, the call-processing system 24 determines 54 whether the caller 2 is also a subscriber. If he is, the call-processing system 24 enhances 55 the service level for this call. In this example, in addition to notifying 58 the recipient, the call-processing system 24 also begins streaming 56 the incoming call through the recipient's computer speakers. The recipient may send 60 additional instructions to the call-processing system 24 in response to either receipt of the call or the notification. For example, the recipient may elect to forward the call to a different phone number or take the call via his computer.



FIGS. 4-6 illustrate a specific implementation of the system shown in FIGS. 1-3. In this implementation, the public telephone network 4 includes the PSTN 104, and the data communications network 6 includes the Internet 106. The recipient 10 is using a computer terminal 110 to access the Internet 106 via a dial-up connection.



FIG. 5 shows the details of one-implementation of the call-processing system 124. It includes a call management (CM) subsystem 108, a router subsystem 140, an online presence-detection Internet session management (SM) subsystem 122, a shared media storage (MS) subsystem 138, and a database (DB) subsystem 136. The CM subsystem 108 interfaces to the PSTN 104 and manages inbound and outbound calls. The router subsystem 140 interfaces to the Internet 106 and manages communications between the recipient's data devices and the various servers. The SM subsystem 122 monitors the status of the recipient's data devices to determine availability for call notification and delivery services. The MS subsystem 138 persistently archives voice messages. The DB subsystem 136 contains records for subscribers. It also contains rules to be applied for call handling/processing and for determining the enhancement of service levels. It may also store subscribers' address books and/or preferences. These various subsystems may be interconnected via Local Area Networks (LANs), private virtual networks running over the Internet and/or Wide Area Networks (WANs).


Referring to FIG. 4, the caller's telephone 102 is connected to a Local Exchange Carrier (LEC) switch via telephone lines 134. The caller's phone 102 can be directly connected to the LEC over conventional POTS (Plain Old Telephone System) lines or via local extension lines behind a corporate Private Branch Exchange (PBX).


In FIG. 5, the CM subsystem 108 is connected to the PSTN 104 via voice trunk circuits 118 that directly interface with the Inter Exchange Carrier's (IXC) circuit-switched or packet-switched telephony network. Thus, advantageously, the call-processing system 124 does not have to be directly serviced by the same LEC switch or PBX. Because of this, the call-processing system 124 or its individual subsystem components can be located in a different geographical area (e.g., a different country) than the sender and recipient. In this embodiment, the call-processing system 124 is locally attached to a LEC switch with a physical line or local trunk interface circuit. In such cases, the switch may or may not be serving the caller's telephone 102. In yet another embodiment, the CM subsystem 108 may be connected to the PSTN 104 via a VoIP network and associated routers 142.


The trunk circuits 118 are not limited to a particular signaling convention. For example, the present invention can be utilized with a Common Channel Signaling (CCS) system, such as Signaling System 7 (SS7), that has separate voice/user data and signaling channels. In addition, the present invention can be used with other signaling methods, such as the following trunk-side signaling interfaces: ISDN-PRI, Advanced Intelligent Network (AlN), and/or Service Node architectures. Preferably, the selected signaling system provides a suite of call-presentation information to the call-processing system 124, including one or more of the following:

    • ANI—Automatic Number Identification (“Caller ID”): the phone number and privacy indicator of the calling party (the caller in this example).
    • DNIS—Dialed Number Identification System: the phone number of the called party or of the call processing system in the case of a forwarded call.
    • OCN/Redirecting—Original Called Number Identification: phone number of the original called party (the recipient in this example) in the case of a forwarded call.


The telephone line 114 may be shared with one or more computer terminals 110. For example, telephone 112 shares the telephone line 114 with a computer terminal 110. In this example, the telephone line 114 is used to establish a dial-up connection for a computer terminal 110, via the computer modem, to an Internet Service Provider (ISP) offering dial-in remote-access service connections from the PSTN 104 via trunk interface circuits 120. The computer terminal 110 can also be connected to the Internet 106 via a broadband connection (such as a DSL or cable modem service, or a T1 line). While the recipient's data device is shown as a computer terminal 110 in FIG. 4, it can also be an interactive television, a network-enabled PDA, another IP (Internet Protocol) device, or the like. If the computer terminal 110 is a personal computer, it can be equipped with a monitor, keyboard, mouse, disk drive, sound card (or similar sound-reproduction circuitry, such as a codec), streaming media playback software (such as Microsoft's Media Player program), speakers, and a modem (such as a standard V.90, 56K dial-up modem).


In this implementation, a client application 116 for the call-processing system 124 resides and executes on the computer terminal 110. The client application 116 is connected to, and communicates with, the call-processing system 124 via the Internet 106.


The call-processing system 124 optionally hosts a web site used by subscribers of the service to set up and manage their accounts. Set-up and management functions can be implemented by the client application 116 as well.


The SM subsystem 122 monitors the Internet for online IP devices registered to subscribers to determine their availability for receiving calls. When a subscriber connects to the Internet using a dial-up ISP, for example, the client application 116 makes the subscriber's online presence known to the call-processing system 124. Presence detection can be performed by the SM subsystem 122 polling or pinging the client application 116, or by the client application 116 transmitting a “Login/I'm alive” message and/or subsequent periodic “Keep alive” messages to the SM subsystem 122. This is just one example of presence management. Broader presence management techniques could be employed, including IETF SIMPLE technology.


If, rather than using a dial-up connection, the subscriber is using a broadband, always-on connection (such as a DSL or cable modem service), the client application 116 typically becomes active when the computer terminal 110 is turned on or powered up, and it stays on until the subscriber manually shuts down the client application 116 or the computer 110 is turned off or powered down.



FIG. 6 is a call-flow diagram that illustrates one example of call handling. For clarity, the full details shown in FIGS. 4-5 are not repeated in FIG. 6. In this example, the calling party 2 places the call from telephone 102 and the recipient 10 normally would receive the call on telephone 112. The recipient subscribes to a service that transmits a call notification to the recipient when the recipient's phone line 114 is busy.


The calling party calls 501 the called party phone line 114 connected to the telephone 112 and computer 110. In this example, the computer 110 is using the phone line 114 to access the Internet 106 or other computer network, and so is online. The PSTN 104 detects that the called party phone line 114 is busy 502. In accordance with a call forwarding service 503, the PSTN 104 forwards the call on busy to the call-processing system 124 via the voice trunk circuits 118. The call-processing system 124 receives 503 the incoming call and, based at least in part on the phone number called (obtainable from the Redirecting/OCN number field for example), the CM subsystem 108 queries the SM subsystem 122 and the DB subsystem 136 to determine whether the forwarded number is registered to a subscriber and if so, then the recipient's service level, what the recipient's call-handling preferences are, and whether the recipient is online. The CM subsystem 108 also queries the SM subsystem 122 and the DB subsystem 136 to determine whether the caller's phone number (obtained from the ANI number field, for example) is registered to a subscriber and if so, the caller's service level, and what the caller's call-handling preferences are. A comparison is made between the service levels of the calling and called parties and the service level is enhanced to match the higher service level of the two. In this example, assume that the enhancement adds streaming of messages, which normally is not part of the recipient's service level.


If the recipient's computer terminal 110 is online, the CM subsystem 108 opens a communication channel over the Internet 106 to the client application 116 running on the recipient's computer terminal 110. The call-processing system 124 transmits 504 a call notification to the recipient's computer terminal 110. This is a part of the recipient's regular service level.


In this example, the call notification consists of the Caller ID of the caller. The Caller ID may come from different sources. For example, it may be provided during set up of the call by the telephone network. The information may also be automatically entered into the recipient's address book. A sound notification can be included in the notification in the form of ringing, which is produced through the recipient's computer 110 speakers. In addition, the CM subsystem 108 performs a Caller Name database lookup using the Caller ID of the caller. The Caller Name, if available, is transmitted 504 to the client application 116 and displayed to the recipient.


Around the same time (it may be before or after), the call-processing system 124 answers 505 the incoming call and establishes 506 a full-duplex (two-way) talk path with the caller. The CM subsystem 108 plays 507 a greeting to the caller and then records and stores the caller's voice message in the MS subsystem 138. As an enhancement to the recipient's regular service level, the CM subsystem 108 simultaneously streams 508 the voice through the opened Internet channel to the client application 116 (or other media player) on the recipient's computer terminal 110. The client application 116 or media player plays the message to the recipient. The subscriber is presented an option to “take-the-call” on his computer or transfer the call to another phone.


If the subscriber chooses not to take the call, after the caller completes his/her message, the call is terminated 509. The call-processing system 124 releases trunk resources and signals 509 call termination to the PSTN 104. The call-processing system 124 also signals 510 completion of the call to the recipient by sending a corresponding control message, which is displayed to the recipient, via the client application 116, as an entry in the call log (for example, 30-second call).


In conventional approaches, services ordered by a subscriber function in a predetermined manner, as specified by a user manual or by contract, and service levels are not affected by service interaction with other subscribers. By using the approach described above, if a service provider determines that the caller and/or recipient were subscribers, the provider could enhance the experience for both parties. For example, the telecommunications provider could increase the message recording length from 30 seconds to 1 minute for all callers who subscribe to the provider's service. The benefit of the increase would be that the caller could leave a longer, more complete message while the recipient, because of the completeness of the message, may not have to return the call. Dynamic subscriber-to-subscriber service enhancements preferably would create an important incentive for the subscriber to encourage non-subscribers to subscribe to the provider's call-processing services and to encourage existing subscribers to upgrade their service levels.


Although the detailed description contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention but merely as illustrating different examples and aspects of the invention. It should be appreciated that the scope of the invention includes other embodiments not discussed in detail above. For example, in many of the examples given above, the service level was enhanced to equal the higher service level subscribed to by either the calling party or the called party, but enhancement of service levels can be decided in other ways.


Table 1 gives an example where there are three service levels. The letter H designates the highest level of service, the letter M a mid-level of service, and the letter L the lowest level of service. Normally, the call is processed according to the service level of the called party (i.e., the service level shown in the third column). However, in this example, service levels are enhanced to match the higher of the two service levels. Columns four and five show the service level enhancement, if any, relative to the normal service level for both the calling and the called parties. Case three, for example, is an instance in which the calling party is at the highest level of service (H) and the called party is at the lowest level of service (L). Normally, the call would be processed at service level L. However, the service level is enhanced to the higher level of the calling party for the duration of the call, so the call is actually processed at service level H, as indicated by the notation L→H in column five.
















TABLE 1









Service Level
Service Level
M to M
M to M






Match
Match
Service Level
Service Level






Applied to
Applied to
Upgrade to
Upgrade to


Case

Call-ING
Call-ED
Call-ING
Call-ED
Call-ING
Call-ED






















1

H
H
H
H
H -> H+
H -> H+


2

H
M
H
M -> H
same
same


3

H
L
H
L -> H
same
same


4

M
H
M -> H
H
same
same


5

M
M
M
M
M -> H
M -> H


6

M
L
M
L -> M
same
same


7

L
H
L -> H
H
same
same


8

L
M
L -> M
M
same
same


9

L
L
L
L
L -> M
L -> M


10

None
H

H
same
same


11

None
M

M
same
same


12

None
L

L
same
same









The sixth and seventh columns show another variation that adds more enhancements to those already existing in columns four and five. In the previous example, if both parties are subscribers, there will always be a service level enhancement except when both parties subscribe to the same service level. For example, in case five, both members have service level M, so the call is processed at service level M under columns four and five, which is not an enhancement for either party. In columns six and seven, these cases also receive service level enhancements. In case five, the service level is enhanced to H for the duration of the call. The notation “same” in columns six and seven indicate that the service level enhancement is the same as in columns four and five. In the example of columns six and seven, the service level is enhanced whenever two subscribers participate in the call. In case one, the service level of H is enhanced to become H+ (an even higher level of service) because the recipient subscribes to level H and he is being called by another subscriber to level H. This might be done in order to reward or encourage subscribers to call other subscribers, to encourage subscribers to enroll in the highest level of service and/or to encourage level H subscribers to encourage their friends to upgrade to level H. In case nine, the call is enhanced to level M (rather than processed at level L), for example to encourage both subscribers to upgrade their service to level M. Note that in this example no enhancements are provided for calls originating with non-subscribers (cases 10-12). Enhancements occur only if both parties are subscribers and, in columns six and seven, enhancements always occur if both parties are subscribers.


Other methods for enhancing the service level will be apparent. For example, whether to enhance the service level or how much to enhance the service level can be based solely according to the calling party's service level, or the called party's service level, rather than on both service levels. It can also be based on other factors within the subscriber status, such as how long the subscriber has been a subscriber. It can also be based on factors within the subscriber status in combination with other factors, such as time of day, geographical location, and whether the service provider is offering a promotion.


Table 2 shows an example where enhancement occurs for “very important callers/callees” (VICs). In this example, certain parties are designated as VICs. For example, the subscriber might actively fill out a list of VICs, or designate certain parties as VICs when entered into the subscriber's address book. Alternately, VICs may be defined by the subscriber's call history, for example those parties which are called or which call the subscriber on a regular basis. Alternately, all parties in the subscriber's address book may be considered to be VICs. Regardless of the definition, in cases 1-3 of Table 2, if a VIC calls the subscriber, then the service level is automatically enhanced, even if the VIC is not a current subscriber. In cases 4-6, if a subscriber calls the VIC (e.g., by originating a call from an address book entry), then the service level is also enhanced. For example, if the calling line is busy, the subscriber might be asked if he would like a call-back when the VIC's line is available (e.g., camp-on service). In addition to improving the value of the call-processing service, this enhancement rule incentivizes the subscriber to populate his address book (if VICs are defined based on the address book).













TABLE 2








VIC Service
VIC Service





Level Upgrade
Level Upgrade


Case
Call-ING
Call-ED
to Call-ING
to Call-ED







1
VIC
H

H -> H+


2
VIC
M

M -> H


3
VIC
L

L -> M


4
H
VIC
H -> H+



5
M
VIC
M -> H



6
L
VIC
L -> M










As some final variations, there are many ways in which service levels can be enhanced. For example, for answering machine services, the maximum length of the voice mail message can be increased, the called party's personal greeting could be played instead of a default greeting, or the number of voice mail editing options could be increased, to name just a few. For call waiting or call notification type services, call notification can be delivered more quickly or with higher priority or in real-time, or call notification can include displaying the caller's name and/or caller ID. In addition, the recipient can be enabled to accept the incoming call, the maximum length for the resulting call connection can be increased, or the call or the voice mail can be streamed to the recipient or delivered by email or other electronic means.

Claims
  • 1. A method of providing call processing services, comprising: providing a first software program to a first computing device associated with a first user, the first user associated with an account of a communication service and entitled to a first level of service features with respect to the communication service;providing a second software program to a second computing device associated with a second user, the second user associated with an account of the communication service and entitled to the first level of service features with respect to the communication service;receiving, at a computing system, a first call for the first user, wherein the first call is associated with call signaling information indicating that the first call is originated from the second software program;based at least in part on a determination that the first user and the second user are associated with respective accounts of the communication service, enabling a call connection between the first software program and the second software program at an enhanced level of service features;receiving a second call for the first user wherein the second call is placed from a telecommunication device associated with a third user; andbased at least in part on a determination that the third user is not associated with an account of the communication service, not providing the enhanced level of service features to the first user, the third user, or the first user and the third user with respect to the second call.
  • 2. The method as defined in claim 1, the method further comprising monitoring an online presence of the first software program, the second software program, or the first software program and the second software program.
  • 3. The method as defined in claim 1, wherein the first computing device associated with the first user or the second computing device associated with the second user comprises an Internet protocol device.
  • 4. The method as defined in claim 1, wherein the first computing device associated with the first user or the second computing device associated with the second user comprises a mobile computing device.
  • 5. The method as defined in claim 1, the method further comprising providing via the first software program a user interface to manage communication service account features.
  • 6. The method as defined in claim 1, wherein the first call is a Voice over Internet Protocol call.
  • 7. The method as defined in claim 1, wherein an enhanced level of service feature is a three-way calling feature.
  • 8. The method as defined in claim 1, wherein the call signaling associated with the first call includes a first address of the second user and a second address of the first user.
  • 9. The method as defined in claim 1, wherein the second call is originated from a telephone associated with the third user.
  • 10. A system, comprising: at least one computing device comprising hardware; andnon-transitory memory coupled to the at least one computing device that stores instructions that when executed by the at least one computing device cause, at least in part, the system to perform operations comprising: providing a first software program to a first computing device associated with a first user, the first user associated with an account of a communication service and a first level of service features with respect to the communication service;providing a second software program to a second computing device associated with a second user, the second user associated an account of the communication service and the first level of service features with respect to the communication service;receiving a first call for the first user, wherein the first call is associated with call signaling information indicating that the first call is originated from the second software program;based at least in part on a determination that the first user and the second user are associated with respective accounts of the communication service, enabling a call connection between the first software program and the second software program at an enhanced level of service features;originating a second call from the first user for a third user wherein the second call is placed to a telecommunication device associated with a third user;based at least in part on a determination that the third user is not associated with an account of the communication service, not providing the enhanced level of service features to the first user, the third user, or the first user and the third user with respect to the second call.
  • 11. The system as defined in claim 10, the operations further comprising monitoring an online presence of the first software program, the second software program, or the first software program and the second software program.
  • 12. The system as defined in claim 10, wherein the first computing device associated with the first user or the second user comprises an Internet protocol device.
  • 13. The system as defined in claim 10, wherein the first computing device associated with the first user or the second computing device associated with the second user comprises a mobile computing device.
  • 14. The system as defined in claim 10, the operations further comprising providing via the first software program a user interface to manage communication service account features.
  • 15. The system as defined in claim 10, wherein the first call is a Voice over Internet Protocol call.
  • 16. The system as defined in claim 10, wherein an enhanced level of service feature is a three-way calling feature.
  • 17. The system as defined in claim 10, wherein the call signaling associated with the first call includes a first address of the second user and a second address of the first user.
  • 18. The system as defined in claim 17, the operations further comprising storing the first address in an address book of the first user.
  • 19. The system as defined in claim 17, wherein the first software program and the second software program respectively correspond to a first instantiation of a client application and a second instantiation of the client application.
  • 20. A method of providing call processing services, comprising: providing a first software program to reside on a computing device associated with a first user, the first user associated with an account of a communication service and a first level of service features with respect to the communication service;providing a second software program to reside on a computing device associated with a second user, the second user associated an account of the communication service and the first level of service features with respect to the communication service;receiving, at a computing system, a first call for the first user, wherein the first call is associated with call signaling information indicating that the first call is originated from the second software program;based at least in part on a determination that the first user and the second user are associated with respective accounts of the communication service, enabling, by the computer system, a call connection between the first software program and the second software program at an enhanced level of service features;originating, by the computer system, a second call from the first user for a third user wherein the second call is placed to a telecommunication device associated with a third user; andbased at least in part on a determination that the third user is not associated with an account of the communication service, not providing the enhanced level of service features to the first user, the third user, or the first user and the third user with respect to the second call.
  • 21. A system, comprising: at least one computing device comprising hardware; andnon-transitory memory coupled to the at least one computing device that stores instructions that when executed by the at least one computing device cause, at least in part, the system to perform operations comprising: providing a first software program to reside on a first computing device associated with a first user, the first user associated with a first account of a communication service and entitled to a first level of service features with respect to the communication service;providing a second software program to reside on a second computing device associated with a second user, the second user associated with a second account of the communication service and entitled to the first level of service features with respect to the communication service;based at least in part on the first user being associated with an account of the communication service and the second user being associated with an account of the communication service, enabling an enhanced level of service features to be provided for a first call for the first user, wherein the first call is associated with call signaling information indicating that the first call is originated from the second software program;with respect to a second call for the first user, from a telecommunication device associated with a third user and based at least in part on the third user not being associated with an account of the communication service, not enabling the enhanced level of service features to be provided to the first user, the third user, or the first user and the third user with respect to the second call.
  • 22. The system as defined in claim 21, the operations further comprising monitoring an online presence of the first software program, the second software program, or the first software program and the second software program.
  • 23. The system as defined in claim 21, wherein the first computing device associated with the first user or the second computing device associated with the second user comprises an Internet protocol device.
  • 24. The system as defined in claim 21, wherein the first computing device associated with the first user or the second computing device associated with the second user comprises a mobile computing device.
  • 25. The system as defined in claim 21, the operations further comprising providing via the first software program a user interface to manage communication service account features.
  • 26. The system as defined in claim 21, wherein the first call is a Voice over Internet Protocol call.
  • 27. The system as defined in claim 21, wherein an enhanced level of service feature is a three-way calling feature.
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/444,312, filed Apr. 11, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/783,014, filed May 19, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,165,278, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/867,944, filed Jun. 14, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,742,586, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (150)
Number Name Date Kind
3936613 Nishigori et al. Feb 1976 A
3956595 Sobanski May 1976 A
4009337 Sakai et al. Feb 1977 A
4022983 Braun et al. May 1977 A
4485470 Reali Nov 1984 A
4736405 Akiyama Apr 1988 A
4809321 Morganstein et al. Feb 1989 A
4893336 Wuthnow Jan 1990 A
4994926 Gordon et al. Feb 1991 A
5040208 Jolissaint Aug 1991 A
5046087 Sakai Sep 1991 A
5291302 Gordon et al. Mar 1994 A
5327486 Wolff et al. Jul 1994 A
5404537 Olnowich et al. Apr 1995 A
5434908 Klein Jul 1995 A
5459584 Gordon et al. Oct 1995 A
5467388 Redd, Jr. et al. Nov 1995 A
5526524 Madduri Jun 1996 A
5533102 Robinson et al. Jul 1996 A
5544229 Creswell et al. Aug 1996 A
5577111 Iida et al. Nov 1996 A
5583918 Nakagawa Dec 1996 A
5619557 Van Berkum Apr 1997 A
5640677 Karlsson Jun 1997 A
5651054 Dunn et al. Jul 1997 A
5668861 Watts Sep 1997 A
5751795 Hassler et al. May 1998 A
5774067 Olnowich et al. Jun 1998 A
5805587 Norris et al. Sep 1998 A
5809128 McMillin Sep 1998 A
5812551 Tsukazoe et al. Sep 1998 A
5825867 Epler et al. Oct 1998 A
5832060 Corlett et al. Nov 1998 A
5835573 Dee et al. Nov 1998 A
5894504 Alfred et al. Apr 1999 A
5946386 Rogers et al. Aug 1999 A
5960064 Foladare et al. Sep 1999 A
5960073 Kikinis et al. Sep 1999 A
5963629 Jung Oct 1999 A
5995594 Shaffer et al. Nov 1999 A
5995603 Anderson Nov 1999 A
6014436 Florence et al. Jan 2000 A
6032051 Hall et al. Feb 2000 A
6034956 Olnowich et al. Mar 2000 A
6035031 Silverman Mar 2000 A
6044059 Olnowich et al. Mar 2000 A
6078581 Shtivelman et al. Jun 2000 A
6097791 Ladd et al. Aug 2000 A
6104800 Benson Aug 2000 A
6144644 Bajzath et al. Nov 2000 A
6160881 Beyda et al. Dec 2000 A
6167127 Smith et al. Dec 2000 A
6169795 Dunn et al. Jan 2001 B1
6169796 Bauer et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178183 Buskirk, Jr. Jan 2001 B1
6181691 Markgraf et al. Jan 2001 B1
6183140 Singer et al. Feb 2001 B1
6208638 Rieley et al. Mar 2001 B1
6212261 Meubus et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222914 McMullin Apr 2001 B1
6230009 Holmes et al. May 2001 B1
6243378 Olnowich Jun 2001 B1
6253249 Belzile Jun 2001 B1
6278704 Creamer et al. Aug 2001 B1
6285745 Bartholomew et al. Sep 2001 B1
6304565 Ramamurthy Oct 2001 B1
6310939 Varney Oct 2001 B1
6350066 Bobo, II Feb 2002 B1
6353660 Burger et al. Mar 2002 B1
6353663 Stevens et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363414 Nicholls et al. Mar 2002 B1
6405035 Singh Jun 2002 B1
6411601 Shaffer et al. Jun 2002 B1
6411805 Becker et al. Jun 2002 B1
6438216 Aktas Aug 2002 B1
6438222 Burg Aug 2002 B1
6477246 Dolan et al. Nov 2002 B1
6496569 Pelletier et al. Dec 2002 B2
6496576 Tanaka et al. Dec 2002 B2
6501750 Shaffer et al. Dec 2002 B1
6505163 Zhang et al. Jan 2003 B1
6510162 Fijolek et al. Jan 2003 B1
6510417 Woods et al. Jan 2003 B1
6512930 Sandegren Jan 2003 B2
6519258 Tsukazoe et al. Feb 2003 B1
6535596 Frey et al. Mar 2003 B1
6539084 Long Mar 2003 B1
6542596 Hill et al. Apr 2003 B1
6546087 Shaffer et al. Apr 2003 B2
6549612 Gifford et al. Apr 2003 B2
6553222 Weiss Apr 2003 B1
6564264 Creswell et al. May 2003 B1
6564321 Bobo, II May 2003 B2
6567505 Omori et al. May 2003 B1
6574319 Latter et al. Jun 2003 B2
6621892 Banister et al. Sep 2003 B1
6643034 Gordon et al. Nov 2003 B1
6662232 Nicholls et al. Dec 2003 B1
6690785 Stelter et al. Feb 2004 B1
6721408 Bain et al. Apr 2004 B1
6744868 Mani Jun 2004 B2
6751299 Brown et al. Jun 2004 B1
6775370 Burg Aug 2004 B2
6782088 Gabara et al. Aug 2004 B1
6785021 Gordon et al. Aug 2004 B1
6792094 Kirkpatrick Sep 2004 B1
6804509 Okon et al. Oct 2004 B1
6857074 Bobo, II Feb 2005 B2
6898275 Dolan et al. May 2005 B2
6917672 Brown et al. Jul 2005 B2
6968174 Trandal et al. Nov 2005 B1
6999572 Shaffer et al. Feb 2006 B1
7003087 Spencer et al. Feb 2006 B2
7254226 Roberts et al. Aug 2007 B1
7283813 Hamanaga et al. Oct 2007 B2
7318049 Iannacci Jan 2008 B2
7397910 Dolan et al. Jul 2008 B2
7418091 Sylvain Aug 2008 B1
7418257 Kim Aug 2008 B2
7433679 Lee et al. Oct 2008 B2
7627022 Monroe et al. Dec 2009 B2
7756728 Maughan et al. Jul 2010 B2
7983398 Spiridellis Jul 2011 B2
8000455 Van Haaften et al. Aug 2011 B1
8059633 Heidermark et al. Nov 2011 B2
20020010616 Itzhaki Jan 2002 A1
20020015486 Saito et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020097710 Burg Jul 2002 A1
20020160819 Daurensan Oct 2002 A1
20020184307 Pineau Dec 2002 A1
20030039339 Luehrig et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030095650 Mize May 2003 A1
20040028203 Wurster et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040190706 Fleisher, III et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040258220 Levine et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050021593 Fitzgerald et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050053216 Spencer et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050111653 Joyce et al. May 2005 A1
20050123118 Terry et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050152521 Liljestrand Jul 2005 A1
20050154599 Kopra et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050156700 Chang Jul 2005 A1
20050201534 Ignatin Sep 2005 A1
20050207556 Gonzalez et al. Sep 2005 A1
20060013374 Fleisher, III et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060227957 Dolan et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060268007 Gopalakrishnan Nov 2006 A1
20070002077 Gopalakrishnan Jan 2007 A1
20070067738 Flynt et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070202898 Bae et al. Aug 2007 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
1329852 May 1994 CA
1 120 954 Aug 2001 EP
10-513632 Dec 1998 JP
11-506292 Jun 1999 JP
2001-168989 Jun 2001 JP
WO 9618948 Jun 1996 WO
WO 9726749 Jul 1997 WO
WO 9836551 Aug 1998 WO
WO 0060840 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0176210 Oct 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Article: Johnson, Dave; “Now You're Talking—voice-response systems for home offices—Product Information”; Home Office Computing: http://www.findarticles.com: Feb. 1999.
Article: Communications—SMS, Dashboard Widgets—Showcase; http://www.dashboardwidgets.com/showcase/details.php?wid=1082; Oct. 14, 2005; 2 pages.
Article: “Widget MySpace Widget”; posted by 4INFO Bob; http://4info.typepad.com/blog/2006/09/widget—myspace—.html; Sep. 15, 2006; 3 pages.
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 13444312 Apr 2012 US
Child 14180190 US
Parent 12783014 May 2010 US
Child 13444312 US
Parent 10867944 Jun 2004 US
Child 12783014 US