1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to providing enhanced service levels for call-processing services, for example during calls between subscribers to the call-processing service.
2. Description of the Related Art
With recent advances in telecommunications technology, service providers are providing more and more complex call-processing services to their subscribers. For example, call-processing services that are available to residential phone subscribers can include answering machine service, caller ID, call waiting, call forwarding, call blocking, and three-way calling, to name just a few. Furthermore, the advent of call handling and call-processing by technologies other than the public switched telephone network (PSTN) has enabled additional call-processing services. Internet answering machine, Internet call waiting, fax-to-email, and voice over IP are just a few examples.
Providers of these call-processing services typically generate revenue by selling these services. The more services that subscribers buy; the more revenue is generated for the service provider. For convenience, the bundle of services purchased by a subscriber shall be referred to as the subscriber's service level. The service level for different subscribers can differ not only in which services are subscribed to, but also the quality of the particular service. As an example of the former, one subscriber might purchase Internet answering machine and fax-to-email, whereas another only purchases Internet answering machine. As an example of the latter, one subscriber might purchase Internet answering machine with a voice mailbox size of 10 minutes and maximum length of 30 seconds per voice mail, and another might purchase Internet answering machine with a voice mailbox size of 30 minutes and maximum voice mail length of 60 seconds.
In order to generate more revenue, service providers generally desire to enroll new subscribers and/or upgrade the service levels for existing subscribers. One way that service providers attempt to do this is by advertising. Advertising campaigns announcing the roll out of new services, attempts to generate media coverage or buzz for certain services, and ad placements in traditional media are all attempts to obtain new subscribers and/or to persuade existing subscribers to upgrade their service levels. However, advertising can be expensive and its effectiveness is not always apparent.
When multiple service providers offer similar services, service providers often will also want to differentiate subscription to their service from subscription to the other services. Service providers will want to somehow make their subscriptions “sticky” in order to prevent subscribers from switching to other service providers. In recent years, some telecommunications service providers have introduced billing plans that are favorable to their subscribers. For example, T-Mobile offers a wireless service where there is no per-minute charge if the calling party and the called party both subscribe to T-Mobile. However, although the pricing depends on whether both parties subscribe to T-Mobile, the actual service level does not.
Adding to these impediments, subscribers may not realize that they want a service until they actually try it. For example, a subscriber may believe he does not need fax-to-email because he does not receive that many faxes and therefore does not need email notification and/or email delivery of the faxes. He may be content to wait until he returns to the office to pick up any faxes sent to him. However, once he tries fax-to-email, he may find that the service is actually very useful to him, for example perhaps because the email-based fax delivery service is more secure or perhaps because he receives more faxes due to the convenience of the service. Service providers have offered free or reduced rate trial periods where subscribers can try new services. However, this still requires the subscriber to take the initiative of signing up for the trial period. It can also require significant resources from the service provider just to set up and administer the trial.
Thus, there is a need for new approaches to call-processing services that provide greater value to subscribers who sign up for higher service levels. There is also a need for new approaches to enroll new subscribers and to encourage existing subscribers to upgrade their service levels.
The present invention overcomes the limitations of the prior art by enhancing service levels based on the subscriber status of at least one of the calling party and the called party. In one example, a calling party (the caller) places a call to a called party (the recipient). At least one of the parties subscribes to a call-processing service and the call normally would be processed according to a predetermined service level. However, the service level is enhanced in response to a subscriber status for at least one of the parties, and the call is processed according to the enhanced service level.
The determination of whether to enhance the service level can be decided in many different ways. For example, enhancement can be determined based on the caller's and/or the recipient's service level. In one approach, the higher service level of the two parties is used, assuming both parties are subscribers. In another approach, additional enhancements are made for subscribers calling other subscribers or for subscribing to higher service levels. In another approach, service levels are enhanced depending on whether the party(s) have somehow been determined to be “important,” for example by being listed in a subscriber's address book.
Different types of enhancement are also possible. For answering machine services, the length of the voice mail message can be increased, the recipient's personal greeting could be played instead of a default greeting, or the number of voice mail editing options could be increased, to name just a few. For call waiting or call notification type services, call notification can be delivered more quickly or with higher priority or in real-time, or call notification can include displaying the caller's name and/or caller ID. In addition, the recipient can be enabled to accept the incoming call, the maximum length for the resulting call connection can be increased, or the call or the voice mail can be streamed to the recipient or delivered by email or other electronic means.
In one architecture for implementing service level enhancement, a call-processing system is connected to the public switched telephone network (PSTN) and to the Internet. The call is switched by the PSTN to the call-processing system. For example, the call may be call forwarded from the recipient's phone line when it is busy. The call-processing system determines whether service level enhancements are in order and then processes the call according to the enhanced service level. The call-processing system provides call notification, call streaming and other services to the recipient via the Internet (e.g., to the recipient's computer).
Other aspects of the invention include other methods, devices and systems corresponding to the above.
The invention has other advantages and features which will be more readily apparent from the following detailed description of the invention and the appended claims, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The system operates as follows. The call placed by the caller 2 is received, in this case by the call-processing system 24. Normally, call-processing (which includes processing of voice calls as well as fax calls) would be applied according to a predetermined service level, typically defined by the subscriber's contract. However, in certain situations depending on the subscriber status of the party(s), the service level will be enhanced and the call will be processed according to the enhanced service level.
As an example, assume that the recipient 10 subscribes to an Internet answering machine service. This service takes messages and then allows retrieval of the messages via the Internet. Thus, a caller 2 typically will leave a message for the recipient and then hang up. Now also assume that a specific caller 2 also subscribes to the Internet answering machine service but at a higher service level that also includes an Internet call connection service. The call connection service allows the subscriber to receive calls on his computer via the Internet. Normally, the recipient 10 would not have this option since he has not subscribed to this service. However, since the caller 2 has subscribed, the recipient's service level is enhanced for this call and the recipient 10 is given the option of taking the call on his computer.
This approach to enhancing service levels has many benefits. First, it can be a good way to offer free trials of services. Second, it can increase the value of higher service levels. As a final example, it can increase word of mouth marketing for services. If the recipient 10 is curious or has questions about the Internet call connection service, he can immediately ask the caller 2 who is a regular subscriber to the service. One advantage of dynamic enhancement of service level is that the added value received by both the caller and the recipient preferably should cause both parties to promote the service to other non-subscribers, thereby reducing subscriber chum and improving growth of the subscriber base. In addition, the caller 2 becomes a promoter of a higher level of service on behalf of the service provider.
A caller 2 is connected to the public telephone network 4 (e.g., by a phone or fax machine) and a recipient 10 is connected to the data communications network 6 (e.g., by a computer or other data device). A call-processing system 24 is connected to both networks 4, 6. The connections can be made either directly or indirectly. For recipient 10, examples of data devices include computers, Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs), and devices that combine both voice and data (e.g., a Handspring Treo). The data device can be connected to the data communications network 6 by any means, including a dial-up connection, a broadband connection (e.g., DSL, cable or direct fiber), a direct connection to the core of the data communications network 6, or wireless access. The connections can be either permanent or temporary. In addition, although the call-processing system 24 shown in
In
Before executing the default rules, the call-processing system 24 determines 54 whether the caller 2 is also a subscriber. If he is, the call-processing system 24 enhances 55 the service level for this call. In this example, in addition to notifying 58 the recipient, the call-processing system 24 also begins streaming 56 the incoming call through the recipient's computer speakers. The recipient may send 60 additional instructions to the call-processing system 24 in response to either receipt of the call or the notification. For example, the recipient may elect to forward the call to a different phone number or take the call via his computer.
Referring to
In
The trunk circuits 118 are not limited to a particular signaling convention. For example, the present invention can be utilized with a Common Channel Signaling (CCS) system, such as Signaling System 7 (SS7), that has separate voice/user data and signaling channels. In addition, the present invention can be used with other signaling methods, such as the following trunk-side signaling interfaces: ISDN-PRI, Advanced Intelligent Network (AlN), and/or Service Node architectures. Preferably, the selected signaling system provides a suite of call-presentation information to the call-processing system 124, including one or more of the following:
The telephone line 114 may be shared with one or more computer terminals 110. For example, telephone 112 shares the telephone line 114 with a computer terminal 110. In this example, the telephone line 114 is used to establish a dial-up connection for a computer terminal 110, via the computer modem, to an Internet Service Provider (ISP) offering dial-in remote-access service connections from the PSTN 104 via trunk interface circuits 120. The computer terminal 110 can also be connected to the Internet 106 via a broadband connection (such as a DSL or cable modem service, or a T1 line). While the recipient's data device is shown as a computer terminal 110 in
In this implementation, a client application 116 for the call-processing system 124 resides and executes on the computer terminal 110. The client application 116 is connected to, and communicates with, the call-processing system 124 via the Internet 106.
The call-processing system 124 optionally hosts a web site used by subscribers of the service to set up and manage their accounts. Set-up and management functions can be implemented by the client application 116 as well.
The SM subsystem 122 monitors the Internet for online IP devices registered to subscribers to determine their availability for receiving calls. When a subscriber connects to the Internet using a dial-up ISP, for example, the client application 116 makes the subscriber's online presence known to the call-processing system 124. Presence detection can be performed by the SM subsystem 122 polling or pinging the client application 116, or by the client application 116 transmitting a “Login/I'm alive” message and/or subsequent periodic “Keep alive” messages to the SM subsystem 122. This is just one example of presence management. Broader presence management techniques could be employed, including IETF SIMPLE technology.
If, rather than using a dial-up connection, the subscriber is using a broadband, always-on connection (such as a DSL or cable modem service), the client application 116 typically becomes active when the computer terminal 110 is turned on or powered up, and it stays on until the subscriber manually shuts down the client application 116 or the computer 110 is turned off or powered down.
The calling party calls 501 the called party phone line 114 connected to the telephone 112 and computer 110. In this example, the computer 110 is using the phone line 114 to access the Internet 106 or other computer network, and so is online. The PSTN 104 detects that the called party phone line 114 is busy 502. In accordance with a call forwarding service 503, the PSTN 104 forwards the call on busy to the call-processing system 124 via the voice trunk circuits 118. The call-processing system 124 receives 503 the incoming call and, based at least in part on the phone number called (obtainable from the Redirecting/OCN number field for example), the CM subsystem 108 queries the SM subsystem 122 and the DB subsystem 136 to determine whether the forwarded number is registered to a subscriber and if so, then the recipient's service level, what the recipient's call-handling preferences are, and whether the recipient is online. The CM subsystem 108 also queries the SM subsystem 122 and the DB subsystem 136 to determine whether the caller's phone number (obtained from the ANI number field, for example) is registered to a subscriber and if so, the caller's service level, and what the caller's call-handling preferences are. A comparison is made between the service levels of the calling and called parties and the service level is enhanced to match the higher service level of the two. In this example, assume that the enhancement adds streaming of messages, which normally is not part of the recipient's service level.
If the recipient's computer terminal 110 is online, the CM subsystem 108 opens a communication channel over the Internet 106 to the client application 116 running on the recipient's computer terminal 110. The call-processing system 124 transmits 504 a call notification to the recipient's computer terminal 110. This is a part of the recipient's regular service level.
In this example, the call notification consists of the Caller ID of the caller. The Caller ID may come from different sources. For example, it may be provided during set up of the call by the telephone network. The information may also be automatically entered into the recipient's address book. A sound notification can be included in the notification in the form of ringing, which is produced through the recipient's computer 110 speakers. In addition, the CM subsystem 108 performs a Caller Name database lookup using the Caller ID of the caller. The Caller Name, if available, is transmitted 504 to the client application 116 and displayed to the recipient.
Around the same time (it may be before or after), the call-processing system 124 answers 505 the incoming call and establishes 506 a full-duplex (two-way) talk path with the caller. The CM subsystem 108 plays 507 a greeting to the caller and then records and stores the caller's voice message in the MS subsystem 138. As an enhancement to the recipient's regular service level, the CM subsystem 108 simultaneously streams 508 the voice through the opened Internet channel to the client application 116 (or other media player) on the recipient's computer terminal 110. The client application 116 or media player plays the message to the recipient. The subscriber is presented an option to “take-the-call” on his computer or transfer the call to another phone.
If the subscriber chooses not to take the call, after the caller completes his/her message, the call is terminated 509. The call-processing system 124 releases trunk resources and signals 509 call termination to the PSTN 104. The call-processing system 124 also signals 510 completion of the call to the recipient by sending a corresponding control message, which is displayed to the recipient, via the client application 116, as an entry in the call log (for example, 30-second call).
In conventional approaches, services ordered by a subscriber function in a predetermined manner, as specified by a user manual or by contract, and service levels are not affected by service interaction with other subscribers. By using the approach described above, if a service provider determines that the caller and/or recipient were subscribers, the provider could enhance the experience for both parties. For example, the telecommunications provider could increase the message recording length from 30 seconds to 1 minute for all callers who subscribe to the provider's service. The benefit of the increase would be that the caller could leave a longer, more complete message while the recipient, because of the completeness of the message, may not have to return the call. Dynamic subscriber-to-subscriber service enhancements preferably would create an important incentive for the subscriber to encourage non-subscribers to subscribe to the provider's call-processing services and to encourage existing subscribers to upgrade their service levels.
Although the detailed description contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention but merely as illustrating different examples and aspects of the invention. It should be appreciated that the scope of the invention includes other embodiments not discussed in detail above. For example, in many of the examples given above, the service level was enhanced to equal the higher service level subscribed to by either the calling party or the called party, but enhancement of service levels can be decided in other ways.
Table 1 gives an example where there are three service levels. The letter H designates the highest level of service, the letter M a mid-level of service, and the letter L the lowest level of service. Normally, the call is processed according to the service level of the called party (i.e., the service level shown in the third column). However, in this example, service levels are enhanced to match the higher of the two service levels. Columns four and five show the service level enhancement, if any, relative to the normal service level for both the calling and the called parties. Case three, for example, is an instance in which the calling party is at the highest level of service (H) and the called party is at the lowest level of service (L). Normally, the call would be processed at service level L. However, the service level is enhanced to the higher level of the calling party for the duration of the call, so the call is actually processed at service level H, as indicated by the notation L→H in column five.
The sixth and seventh columns show another variation that adds more enhancements to those already existing in columns four and five. In the previous example, if both parties are subscribers, there will always be a service level enhancement except when both parties subscribe to the same service level. For example, in case five, both members have service level M, so the call is processed at service level M under columns four and five, which is not an enhancement for either party. In columns six and seven, these cases also receive service level enhancements. In case five, the service level is enhanced to H for the duration of the call. The notation “same” in columns six and seven indicate that the service level enhancement is the same as in columns four and five. In the example of columns six and seven, the service level is enhanced whenever two subscribers participate in the call. In case one, the service level of H is enhanced to become H+ (an even higher level of service) because the recipient subscribes to level H and he is being called by another subscriber to level H. This might be done in order to reward or encourage subscribers to call other subscribers, to encourage subscribers to enroll in the highest level of service and/or to encourage level H subscribers to encourage their friends to upgrade to level H. In case nine, the call is enhanced to level M (rather than processed at level L), for example to encourage both subscribers to upgrade their service to level M. Note that in this example no enhancements are provided for calls originating with non-subscribers (cases 10-12). Enhancements occur only if both parties are subscribers and, in columns six and seven, enhancements always occur if both parties are subscribers.
Other methods for enhancing the service level will be apparent. For example, whether to enhance the service level or how much to enhance the service level can be based solely according to the calling party's service level, or the called party's service level, rather than on both service levels. It can also be based on other factors within the subscriber status, such as how long the subscriber has been a subscriber. It can also be based on factors within the subscriber status in combination with other factors, such as time of day, geographical location, and whether the service provider is offering a promotion.
Table 2 shows an example where enhancement occurs for “very important callers/callees” (VICs). In this example, certain parties are designated as VICs. For example, the subscriber might actively fill out a list of VICs, or designate certain parties as VICs when entered into the subscriber's address book. Alternately, VICs may be defined by the subscriber's call history, for example those parties which are called or which call the subscriber on a regular basis. Alternately, all parties in the subscriber's address book may be considered to be VICs. Regardless of the definition, in cases 1-3 of Table 2, if a VIC calls the subscriber, then the service level is automatically enhanced, even if the VIC is not a current subscriber. In cases 4-6, if a subscriber calls the VIC (e.g., by originating a call from an address book entry), then the service level is also enhanced. For example, if the calling line is busy, the subscriber might be asked if he would like a call-back when the VIC's line is available (e.g., camp-on service). In addition to improving the value of the call-processing service, this enhancement rule incentivizes the subscriber to populate his address book (if VICs are defined based on the address book).
As some final variations, there are many ways in which service levels can be enhanced. For example, for answering machine services, the maximum length of the voice mail message can be increased, the called party's personal greeting could be played instead of a default greeting, or the number of voice mail editing options could be increased, to name just a few. For call waiting or call notification type services, call notification can be delivered more quickly or with higher priority or in real-time, or call notification can include displaying the caller's name and/or caller ID. In addition, the recipient can be enabled to accept the incoming call, the maximum length for the resulting call connection can be increased, or the call or the voice mail can be streamed to the recipient or delivered by email or other electronic means.
The application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/444,312, filed Apr. 11, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/783,014, filed May 19, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,165,278, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/867,944, filed Jun. 14, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,742,586, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3936613 | Nishigori et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3956595 | Sobanski | May 1976 | A |
4009337 | Sakai et al. | Feb 1977 | A |
4022983 | Braun et al. | May 1977 | A |
4485470 | Reali | Nov 1984 | A |
4736405 | Akiyama | Apr 1988 | A |
4809321 | Morganstein et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4893336 | Wuthnow | Jan 1990 | A |
4994926 | Gordon et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5040208 | Jolissaint | Aug 1991 | A |
5046087 | Sakai | Sep 1991 | A |
5291302 | Gordon et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5327486 | Wolff et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5404537 | Olnowich et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5434908 | Klein | Jul 1995 | A |
5459584 | Gordon et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5467388 | Redd, Jr. et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5526524 | Madduri | Jun 1996 | A |
5533102 | Robinson et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544229 | Creswell et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5577111 | Iida et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5583918 | Nakagawa | Dec 1996 | A |
5619557 | Van Berkum | Apr 1997 | A |
5640677 | Karlsson | Jun 1997 | A |
5651054 | Dunn et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5668861 | Watts | Sep 1997 | A |
5751795 | Hassler et al. | May 1998 | A |
5774067 | Olnowich et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5805587 | Norris et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809128 | McMillin | Sep 1998 | A |
5812551 | Tsukazoe et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5825867 | Epler et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832060 | Corlett et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835573 | Dee et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5894504 | Alfred et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5946386 | Rogers et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5960064 | Foladare et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960073 | Kikinis et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963629 | Jung | Oct 1999 | A |
5995594 | Shaffer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995603 | Anderson | Nov 1999 | A |
6014436 | Florence et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6032051 | Hall et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034956 | Olnowich et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6035031 | Silverman | Mar 2000 | A |
6044059 | Olnowich et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6078581 | Shtivelman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6097791 | Ladd et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6104800 | Benson | Aug 2000 | A |
6144644 | Bajzath et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160881 | Beyda et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167127 | Smith et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169795 | Dunn et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6169796 | Bauer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178183 | Buskirk, Jr. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181691 | Markgraf et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183140 | Singer et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208638 | Rieley et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212261 | Meubus et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222914 | McMullin | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230009 | Holmes et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243378 | Olnowich | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253249 | Belzile | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6278704 | Creamer et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285745 | Bartholomew et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304565 | Ramamurthy | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310939 | Varney | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6350066 | Bobo, II | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353660 | Burger et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6353663 | Stevens et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363414 | Nicholls et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6405035 | Singh | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411601 | Shaffer et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411805 | Becker et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6438216 | Aktas | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438222 | Burg | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6477246 | Dolan et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496569 | Pelletier et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6496576 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6501750 | Shaffer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505163 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510162 | Fijolek et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510417 | Woods et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512930 | Sandegren | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6519258 | Tsukazoe et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6535596 | Frey et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539084 | Long | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542596 | Hill et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546087 | Shaffer et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6549612 | Gifford et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6553222 | Weiss | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564264 | Creswell et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6564321 | Bobo, II | May 2003 | B2 |
6567505 | Omori et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574319 | Latter et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6621892 | Banister et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643034 | Gordon et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6662232 | Nicholls et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6690785 | Stelter et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6721408 | Bain et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6744868 | Mani | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751299 | Brown et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6775370 | Burg | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6782088 | Gabara et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785021 | Gordon et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6792094 | Kirkpatrick | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6804509 | Okon et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6857074 | Bobo, II | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6898275 | Dolan et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6917672 | Brown et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6968174 | Trandal et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6999572 | Shaffer et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003087 | Spencer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7254226 | Roberts et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7283813 | Hamanaga et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7318049 | Iannacci | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7397910 | Dolan et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7418091 | Sylvain | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7418257 | Kim | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7433679 | Lee et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7627022 | Monroe et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7756728 | Maughan et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7983398 | Spiridellis | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8000455 | Van Haaften et al. | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8059633 | Heidermark et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
20020010616 | Itzhaki | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015486 | Saito et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020097710 | Burg | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020160819 | Daurensan | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020184307 | Pineau | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030039339 | Luehrig et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030095650 | Mize | May 2003 | A1 |
20040028203 | Wurster et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040190706 | Fleisher, III et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040258220 | Levine et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021593 | Fitzgerald et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050053216 | Spencer et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050111653 | Joyce et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050123118 | Terry et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050152521 | Liljestrand | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050154599 | Kopra et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050156700 | Chang | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050201534 | Ignatin | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050207556 | Gonzalez et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060013374 | Fleisher, III et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060227957 | Dolan et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060268007 | Gopalakrishnan | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070002077 | Gopalakrishnan | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070067738 | Flynt et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070202898 | Bae et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1329852 | May 1994 | CA |
1 120 954 | Aug 2001 | EP |
10-513632 | Dec 1998 | JP |
11-506292 | Jun 1999 | JP |
2001-168989 | Jun 2001 | JP |
WO 9618948 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9726749 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO 9836551 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO 0060840 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0176210 | Oct 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Article: Johnson, Dave; “Now You're Talking—voice-response systems for home offices—Product Information”; Home Office Computing: http://www.findarticles.com: Feb. 1999. |
Article: Communications—SMS, Dashboard Widgets—Showcase; http://www.dashboardwidgets.com/showcase/details.php?wid=1082; Oct. 14, 2005; 2 pages. |
Article: “Widget MySpace Widget”; posted by 4INFO Bob; http://4info.typepad.com/blog/2006/09/widget—myspace—.html; Sep. 15, 2006; 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13444312 | Apr 2012 | US |
Child | 14180190 | US | |
Parent | 12783014 | May 2010 | US |
Child | 13444312 | US | |
Parent | 10867944 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 12783014 | US |