Understanding that the drawings depict only exemplary embodiments and are not therefore to be considered limiting in scope, the exemplary embodiments will be described with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which are shown by way of specific illustrative embodiments. However, it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and that logical, mechanical, and electrical changes may be made. Furthermore, the method presented in the drawing figures and the specification is not to be construed as limiting the order in which the individual acts may be performed. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be construed in a limiting sense. Wherever possible, the same or like reference numbers are used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like structural components or parts.
Certain DC-DC converters (e.g., step-down or buck converters) commonly utilize a compensation filter or “feedback amplifier” for closed-loop regulation so that the feedback network gain and phase as a function of frequency ensure that the overall system with feedback remains stable. For example, certain buck converters include Type-III Switched Capacitor Filter (SCF) compensation to ensure that their stability, transient response and closed loop performance meets the requirements imposed by the overall systems involved. Nevertheless, a significant problem with these buck converters is that one or more sample and hold amplifier (SHA) stages are needed to operate the SCF circuit and prevent aliasing distortion. Each SHA stage adds a phase lag of T/2 (where T is the sampling period of the SCF) to the feedback loop, which is highly undesirable in such a closed loop system because the phase lag directly and negatively impacts the stability, transient response and thus the closed loop performance of the buck converter and system involved. Also, each SHA stage increases the footprint, power consumption and cost for the dies on which the SCF compensation circuits are formed. Furthermore, the existing SCF compensation circuits generate a complex, high frequency pole, which further degrades their closed loop performance and thus the stability and performance of the buck converters involved. Finally, this high frequency pole requires the utilization of high bandwidth amplification circuitry in the SCF compensation circuits involved, which results in much higher power dissipation requirements than desired. Nevertheless, as described below, the present invention resolves these and other, related problems with enhanced Type-III SCF compensation in buck converters formed on integrated circuits, wafers, chips or dies.
Specifically, referring to
The SCF compensation circuit 100 also includes a DDA 110. The DDA 110 includes two input pairs: (V1+, V1−) and (V2+, V2−). The integrated voltage (error) signal VINTEG at the node 108 is coupled to the V2+ terminal of the DDA 110. A common-mode voltage signal, VCM, (e.g., circuit reference voltage which may be different from VREF 105) is coupled to the V1+ terminal of the DDA 110. The common-mode voltage signal, VCM, which is a DC voltage and an AC ground, is also coupled to a first terminal of a second capacitor, C2 112. The common-mode voltage signal, VCM, functions as a bias point for the DDA 110 to ensure that the DDA 110 operates as required As such, for this exemplary embodiment, the common-mode voltage, VCM, can be selected to be mid-rail or (VDD−GND)/2 and can be treated as an AC ground. The second terminal of the second capacitor C2 112 is coupled to the V1− terminal of the DDA 110, and the voltage feedback signal, VFB, is coupled to the V2− terminal of the DDA 110.
The second terminal of the second capacitor, C2 112, is also coupled to a first terminal of a third capacitor C3 116, a first terminal of a first transistor (e.g., MOSFET) switch 118a (Φ2), and a second terminal of a second transistor (e.g., MOSFET) switch 118b (Φ1). The second terminal of the first transistor switch 118a is coupled to a first terminal of a fourth (switching) capacitor, C4 120a, 120b and a first terminal of a third transistor (e.g., MOSFET) switch 122a (Φ1). The second terminal of the fourth capacitor C4 120a, 120b is coupled to a first terminal of a fourth transistor (e.g., MOSFET) switch 122b (Φ2). The second terminals of the transistor switches 122a, 122b and the third capacitor C3 116 are coupled to the output terminal of the DDA 110, which provides an error or compensation voltage signal, VCOMP, at the output node 114. In the exemplary embodiment shown in
In order to implement the Type-III SCF circuit 101 depicted in
VINTEG−VFB=0−V2 (1)
The integrated voltage signal, VINTEG, can be expressed as follows (assuming infinite gain for the error amplifier 106):
Mathematically manipulating the voltage signals at the inputs of the DDA 110 produces the following expressions:
Substituting Equations (3) and (7) in Equation (1) produces the following expressions:
Note that, as indicated by Equation (9), the manipulation of the transfer functions at the inputs of the DDA 110 produces two poles: one pole is placed at the origin to provide a high level of DC voltage regulation; and the second pole is placed at high frequency. Additionally, two real zeros are placed close to the inductance-capacitance (LC) double-pole frequency present in voltage-mode control. Also note that the term REQ4 in Equation (9) represents the resistor equivalent of the switched capacitor, C4. As such, a bilinear transformation (BLT) can be utilized to convert the continuous-time filter (represented in the Laplace or “s” domain) into a discrete-time filter (represented in the “z” domain), as described directly below.
In order to obtain the discrete-time filter representation of the SCF circuit 100, the BLT equation can be expressed as:
Where, T is the sampling time period of the SCF. In the exemplary embodiment depicted in
The complete frequency response of the transfer function is then obtained by substituting the following in Equation (11):
z=ejoff T (12)
In summary, the SCF compensation circuit 101 depicted in
Specifically, the SCF compensation circuit 200 receives a voltage feedback signal, VFB, (e.g., from the output node of a buck converter) at an input node 202. The input node 202 is connected to the input terminal of a sampled-data front-end circuit 230 (described in detail below). The output terminal of the sampled-data front-end circuit 230 is coupled to a node 203, which is connected to the first terminal of a capacitor C0 204 and the inverting input of an error amplifier (e.g., operational amplifier) 206. The non-inverting input of the error amplifier 206 is connected to receive a reference voltage signal, VREF 205. The circuitry including the sampled-data front-end circuit 230, capacitor C0 204 and error amplifier 206 functions as an integrator circuit 209 to provide an integrated voltage signal VINTEG at the output of the error amplifier 206 and the node 208. As such, and as described in detail below, in this exemplary embodiment, the SCF compensation circuit 200 includes a sampled-data, integrator front-end circuit.
The integrated voltage signal VINTEG at the node 208 is coupled to the V2+ input of a DDA 210. The voltage feedback signal, VFB, is coupled to the V2− input of the DDA 210. The V1+ input of the DDA 210 is coupled to a common-mode voltage signal, VCM (e.g., circuit reference voltage signal). The common-mode voltage signal, VCM, which is a DC voltage and an AC ground, is also coupled to a first terminal of a second capacitor, C2 212. As such, the common-mode voltage signal, VCM, functions as a bias point to ensure that the DDA 210 functions as required. For this exemplary embodiment, the common-mode voltage, VCM, is selected to be mid-rail or VCM=(VDD−GND)/2. The second terminal of the second capacitor C2 212 is coupled to the V1− input of the DDA 210. The output of the DDA 210 provides a compensation voltage signal, VCOMP, at the output node 214. In this exemplary embodiment, the output node 214 is coupled to the DC-DC (buck) converter involved.
The second terminal of the second capacitor, C212, is also coupled to a first terminal of a third capacitor C3 216, a first terminal of a first transistor (e.g., MOSFET) switch 218a (Φ2), and a second terminal of a second transistor (e.g., MOSFET) switch 218b (Φ1). The second terminal of the first transistor switch 218a is coupled to a first terminal of a fourth (switching) capacitor, C4 220a, 220b and a first terminal of a third transistor (e.g., MOSFET) switch 222a (Φ1). The second terminal of the fourth capacitor C4 220a, 220b is coupled to a first terminal of a fourth transistor (e.g., MOSFET) switch 222b (Φ2). The second terminals of the transistor switches 222a, 222b and the third capacitor C3 216 are coupled to the output node 214. Thus, in this exemplary embodiment, the transistor switches 218a, 218b, 222a, 222b, the (switching) fourth capacitor C4 220 and the DDA 210 function together to provide a Type-III SCF 201.
In this embodiment, the sampled-data, front-end circuit 230 receives the feedback voltage signal, VFB, at a first terminal of a fifth transistor (e.g., MOSFET) switch 224a (Φ1), and a first terminal of a sixth transistor (e.g., MOSFET) switch 224b (Φ1). The second terminal of the fifth transistor switch 224a is coupled to a first terminal of a switching capacitor, C1 226a, 226b and a first terminal of a seventh transistor (e.g., MOSFET) switch 228a (Φ2). The second terminal of the switching (fifth) capacitor C1 226a, 226b is coupled to the second terminal of the sixth transistor switch 224b and a first terminal of an eighth transistor (e.g., MOSFET) switch 228b (Φ2). The second terminal of the eighth transistor switch 228b is coupled to the second terminal of the seventh transistor switch 228a and the node 203. Thus, the Type-III SCF 200 includes a sampled-data circuit (230) and integrator circuit (209) front-end.
In this exemplary embodiment, both of the switching capacitors, C1 226 and C4 220, can be implemented as equivalent resistors REQ1 and REQ4, respectively, in the discrete-time domain. Therefore, assuming that Equations (1)-(8) above can also apply for this embodiment, Equation (9) can be rewritten and thus expressed as follows:
As such, for this embodiment, in the discrete time domain, Equation (13) can be expressed as follows:
Again, the complete frequency response of this transfer function can be obtained by substituting Equation (12) above in Equation (14).
In summary, the Type-III SCF compensation circuit 200 depicted in the embodiment of
In the embodiment depicted in
The voltage, VOUT, at the output node 418 of the power circuit 402 is coupled to the feedback voltage input, VFB in the SCF compensation circuit 424. For example, referring to
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any arrangement, which is calculated to achieve the same purpose, may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. Therefore, it is manifestly intended that the present application be limited only by the claims and the equivalents thereof.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/989,619, filed Jan. 6, 2016, now U.S. patent Ser. No. 10/008,928. This application also claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/205,230 entitled “ENHANCED SWITCHED CAPACITOR FILTER (SCF) COMPENSATION IN DC-DC CONVERTERS,” filed on Aug. 14, 2015, and to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/253,644 entitled “ENHANCED SWITCHED CAPACITOR FILTER (SCF) COMPENSATION IN DC-DC CONVERTERS,” filed on Nov. 10, 2015, all of which applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5490055 | Boylan | Feb 1996 | A |
7619474 | Fukukaza | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7782042 | Fukuzawa | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7845227 | Fukuzawa | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7870786 | Fukuzawa | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7893766 | Cranford, Jr. | Feb 2011 | B1 |
8754699 | Bawa et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8768998 | Dasgupta et al. | Jul 2014 | B1 |
20060006933 | Nguyen | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060173364 | Clancy et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20090273386 | Korobeynikov et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100164491 | Kejik et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110221518 | Romero | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130002212 | Fan | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130113550 | Bawa | May 2013 | A1 |
20130265035 | Mazzarella | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140002291 | Atriss | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140097881 | Lynch et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20150236593 | Cheng | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150378378 | Zhang | Dec 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Bawa et al, “Switched-Capacitor Filter based Type-III Compensation for switched-mode Buck Converters”, “Custom Integrated Circuits Conference”, Sep. 22-25, 2013, pp. 1-4, Publisher: IEEE. |
Bawa, “Switched-Capacitor Filter Based Type-III Compensation for Voltage-Mode Control of Switched-Mode Buck Converters”, 2013, pp. 1-137. |
Cheng et al, “A 10/30 MHz Fast Reference—Tracking Buck Converter With ODA-Based Type-III Compensator”, “IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits”, Dec. 2014, pp. 2788-2799, vol. 49, No. 12. |
Keller, Matiias et al., “A Comparative Study on Excess-Loop-Delay Compensation Techniques for Continuous-Time Sigma-Delta Modulators”, Dec. 12, 2008, pp. 1-8, vol. 55, No. 11, Publisher: IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—I, Published in: US. |
Pavan, Shanthi, “Excess Loop Delay Compensation in Continuous-Time Delta-Sigma Modulators”, Dec. 10, 2008, pp. 1-5, vol. 55, No. 11, Publisher: IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—II, Published in: US. |
Sai, Akihide et al., “A Digitally Stabilized Type-III PLL Using Ring VCO with 1.01 psrms Integrated Jitter in 65nm CMOS”, Feb. 21, 2012, pp. 1-3, Publisher: 2012 IEEE International Solid-Slate Circuits Conference, Published in: San Francisco, CA. |
Temes et al, “Switched-Capacitor Filter Design Using the Bilinear z-Transform”, “IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems”, Dec. 1978, pp. 1039-1044, vol. CAS-25, No. 12, Publisher: IEEE. |
Wang, Kevin et al., “A Discrete-Time Model for the Design of Type-IL PLLs With Passive Sampled Loop Filters”, Feb. 28, 2011, pp. 264-275, vol. 58, No. 2, Publisher: IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—I, Published in: US. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180309364 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62253644 | Nov 2015 | US | |
62205230 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14989619 | Jan 2016 | US |
Child | 16017763 | US |