The present subject matter relates generally to wind turbines and, more particularly, to systems and methods for infusing resin into composite wind turbine rotor blades and other wind turbine components.
Generally, a wind turbine includes a tower, a nacelle mounted on the tower, and a rotor coupled to the nacelle. The rotor generally includes a rotatable hub and a plurality of rotor blades coupled to and extending outwardly from the hub. Each rotor blade may be spaced about the hub so as to facilitate rotating the rotor to enable kinetic energy to be converted into usable mechanical energy, which may then be transmitted to an electric generator disposed within the nacelle for the production of electrical energy. Typically, the blades are fabricated from composite materials formed in a mold. For instance, carbon fiber composite, glass fiber composite, or fiber reinforced plastic preforms can be laid-up and infused with a resin to bond the layers into final form.
Composite infusions are closed-mold processes for fabricating large fiber-reinforced composite structures. In the simplest form, a laminate fiber preform is installed onto a mold surface and sealed with an outer mold surface. A vacuum is applied to remove entrapped air from the preform and resin is then allowed to infuse into the preform and cure. As typical thermosetting resins have high viscosities, processing techniques have been developed to improve the speed and quality of resin infusion. The flow rate v (m/s) of a resin can be expressed as v=−K·ΔP/μ; where K denotes permeability, an index representing the easiness of impregnation into the reinforcing fiber base material with the resin, P denotes the pressure of the resin, and μ denotes the viscosity of the resin. In this formula, ΔP represents the pressure gradient. As the value of permeability increases, it becomes easier to impregnate the reinforcing fiber base material with the resin. It can be seen that the impregnation distance of the resin is proportional to the permeability of the reinforcing fiber base material used and the pressure of the resin and inversely proportional to the viscosity of the resin.
One processing technique uses a flow medium for a faster injection of resin into a fiber layup structure in order to produce a composite. Specifically, flow media are used in order to distribute resin within a fiber layup structure and to increase the injection speed of the resin into the fiber layup structure. Depending on the geometry and the final size of the produced composite component it is often not possible to inject the necessary amount of resin without the use of a flow medium, because the flow resistance of the resin into the fiber layup structure is too large.
A large number of different flow media are known which are usable for a variety of different processing conditions. However, common for these different flow media is the somewhat labor intensive lay-up of the respective flow medium and even more so, the removal of the respective flow medium after the resin within the composite component has been cured. Furthermore, during use, the flow medium absorbs a relative large amount of resin, which must subsequently be discarded.
Aspects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the following description, or may be obvious from the description, or may be learned through practice of the invention.
In one aspect, a method for producing a composite laminate component for a wind turbine is disclosed as initially assembling a laminated structure having at least two reinforced layers and a plurality of interleaf layers positioned adjacent to one of the at least two reinforced layers. Then placing the laminated structure into a mold where resin is sequentially and independently transferred into each layer of the plurality of interleaf layers. Then curing the transferred resin in the laminated structure to form a composite laminate component having the at least two reinforced layers, the plurality of interleaf layers, and cured resin.
In another aspect, the present subject matter discloses a wind turbine composite laminate component having at least two reinforced layers and a plurality of interleaf layers positioned adjacent to one of the at least two reinforced layers. The laminate component is configured to sequentially and independently transfer resin into each layer of the plurality of interleaf layers, and cure the transferred resin in the laminated structure to form a composite laminate component comprising the at least two reinforced layers, the plurality of interleaf layers, and cured resin.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description and appended claims. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof, directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth in the specification, which makes reference to the appended figures, in which:
Repeat use of reference characters in the present specification and drawings is intended to represent the same or analogous features or elements of the present disclosure.
Reference now will be made in detail to embodiments of the invention, one or more examples of which are illustrated in the drawings. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not limitation of the invention. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment can be used with another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers such modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.
In general, the present subject matter discloses systems and methods for fabricating composite laminates by placing high permeability flow media interleaf layers in the thickness of the laminate stack with a dedicated resin feed line for each flow media interleaf layer. Providing a dedicated feed line for each interleaf layer significantly increases the pressure driving force through-thickness which is at least partially responsible for the fill time reduction. Infusion of resin through the composite thickness is accomplished by sequentially triggering the resin feed lines, which can also prevent defect formation in the composite structure. Also, a separation layer, such as a non-porous peel ply section, can be placed between the resin feed lines to prevent defect formation.
The term “fiber” as used herein means thin filamentous fibers, but may also be rovings (fiber bunches), bands of rovings or mats, which may be felt mats of single-fibers or mats of fiber rovings. Alternatively, fiber in the form of non-woven, melt-spun fiber mat or fabric may be impregnated with a modified polyester matrix resin to form a prepreg for use in a variety of fabrication processes. Chopped or milled fibers may also be used. The fibers used in the present invention are preferably glass fibers or carbon fibers. By the term carbon fiber is meant any of the conventional carbonized or graphitized fibers obtained by known processes from such organic fiber or filament precursors as rayon, polyacrylonitrile (PAN), pitch or the like.
The term “resin” as used herein means a natural or synthetic resin or a suitable polymer. The resin can be a combination of a liquid ethylenically unsaturated monomer and unsaturated polyester to form a polyester resin composition. The resin can also be a polyester, vinyl ester and epoxy resin. However, the resin in the context of the present invention can also be a combined system including other chemicals such as catalysts, hardening agents, accelerator and additives (e.g. thixotropic, pigment, filler, chemical/fire resistance, etc.).
The term “curing” as used herein means that the resin becomes a chemically resistant hard solid. The molecules in the resin will cross-link assisted by catalysts or hardening agents, and the process is a non-reversible chemical reaction.
The term “porous” as used herein is used to describe a material structure filled with voids or pores and relates to a three-dimensional structure allowing flow of a liquid phase in multiple directions of the structure such as a knitted, woven, needled or crocheted, foamed, or filter-like material.
The term “high permeability” is considered intrinsic permeability of a media with values ranging from 1×10−9 to 1×10−7 m2, and “low permeability” is considered values ranging from 1×10−10 to 1×10−12 m2.
Referring now to the drawings,
Referring now to
In several embodiments, the body 38 of the rotor blade 22 may be formed as a single, unitary component. Alternatively, the body 38 may be formed from a plurality of shell components. For example, the body 38 may be manufactured from a first shell half generally defining the pressure side 40 of the rotor blade 22 and a second shell half generally defining the suction side 42 of the rotor blade 20, with the shell halves being secured to one another at the leading and trailing edges 44, 46 of the blade 22. Additionally, the body 38, the blade root 34, and the blade tip 36 may generally be formed from any suitable material. For instance, in one embodiment, the blade root 34 may be formed entirely from a laminate composite material, such as a carbon fiber reinforced laminate composite or a glass fiber reinforced laminate composite.
For example, at the wind blade root 34 section where the thickest laminate is in a blade shell (i.e. root overbuild region), a narrow piece of non-porous (impermeable to resin) peel ply 62 can be placed directly underneath an entrance portion of each interleaf layer 54 to guide resin flow directly from the dedicated resin feed line 56, 58, 60 and avoid potential resin race tracking occurring between the root 34 end face of the laminate and the root edge dam surface. The peel ply 62 can be in the root overbuild region which can be trimmed off in a secondary operation.
The high permeability interleaf layer 54 media can be a continuous fiber mat having an intrinsic permeability in the range of about 1×10−9 to about 1×10−7 squared meters. The interleaf layer 54 acts as a structural ply and can have its own resin feed line 56, 58, 60 that can be triggered individually, independently and sequentially by a resin flow control circuit 64. A resin infusion manifold 68 can supply resin 66 through control valves 70 on each resin feed line 56, 58, 60 to sequentially trigger the supply of resin to each resin feed line 56, 58, 60, thereby providing faster resin infusion that is less prone to form infusion defects. The interleaf layer 54 structural media can be woven, knitted, open celled foam, sponge-like, mesh-like, filter-like, or combinations thereof. The interleaf layer 54 can be an elastic and/or flexible material, which can be inserted in the laminated structure 52 not only in a planar but also in a three-dimensionally curved manner, such as corrugated.
As mentioned above, laminated structure 52 filling time and the speed of the resin flow front 72 for thick laminates is primarily a function of thru-thickness intrinsic permeability (K) and pressure difference driving force, or pressure gradient (ΔP). Pressure gradient (ΔP) decreases as resin flows into the component and movement of flow front 72 becomes slower and slower. By independently, individually, and sequentially triggering intermediate resin feed lines 56, 58, 60 attached to each high permeability interleaf layer 54, the pressure gradient (ΔP) resets to maximum value and thereby filling the laminate 52 faster. High permeability interleaf layers 54 assist resin 66 flow by quickly transporting resin 66 in-plane.
The method and system disclosed herein of producing composite laminated structures 52 can infuse a curable viscous or liquid resin into the interleaf layers 54 with fiber reinforced layers 53 layered in the mold. The interleaf layer 54 can be a pre-cured solid layer made of a material having a higher intrinsic permeability with respect to the resin than the reinforced layer 53. Although the same material may be used for the interleaf layers 54 as is used for the fiber reinforced layers 53, it may be advantageous if a different material is used for forming the interleaf layers 54. This can provide a desired stiffness ratio of the interleaf layers 54 to the fiber reinforced layers 53 after curing the resin. Additionally, the interleaf layers 54 may be corrugated to increase the space available for resin flow.
This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they include structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3956564 | Hillig | May 1976 | A |
4519591 | Bush | May 1985 | A |
4539253 | Hirschbuehler | Sep 1985 | A |
4707317 | Epel | Nov 1987 | A |
4714575 | Preston | Dec 1987 | A |
4783506 | Gawin | Nov 1988 | A |
4868050 | Tanaka | Sep 1989 | A |
4888247 | Zweben | Dec 1989 | A |
4954382 | Riefler | Sep 1990 | A |
5028478 | Odagiri | Jul 1991 | A |
5085928 | Krueger | Feb 1992 | A |
5104718 | Asada | Apr 1992 | A |
5141804 | Riefler | Aug 1992 | A |
5190802 | Pilato | Mar 1993 | A |
5279893 | Hattori | Jan 1994 | A |
5333568 | Meldner | Aug 1994 | A |
5543212 | Oosedo | Aug 1996 | A |
5597631 | Furumoto | Jan 1997 | A |
5721034 | Seemann, III | Feb 1998 | A |
5904972 | Tunis, III | May 1999 | A |
6048488 | Fink | Apr 2000 | A |
6656411 | McClure | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6670291 | Tompkins | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6919039 | Lang et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6995099 | Nishimura | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7048985 | Mack et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7081218 | Sekido et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7147818 | Rigas | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7351040 | Livingston et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7727631 | Fang | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8048815 | Kubota | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8741198 | Sekido | Jun 2014 | B2 |
9205602 | Shinoda et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
20020167119 | Hemphill | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030011094 | Filsinger et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030162461 | Balthes | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040028884 | Woolstencroft | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040140587 | Hadley | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050104259 | Bannister | May 2005 | A1 |
20060178064 | Balthes | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060252334 | LoFaro | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070107220 | Bakhuis | May 2007 | A1 |
20070108646 | Louderback | May 2007 | A1 |
20070160479 | Livingston | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080277053 | Stiesdal | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080295955 | Cawse | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090035148 | Livingston | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090142193 | Bech | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090181250 | Zmarsly | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090229748 | Berchtold | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090280294 | Branca | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100098906 | Bongiovanni | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100170746 | Restuccia | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100189973 | Mikkelsen | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100324208 | Motsanos et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110017867 | Simmons | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110142662 | Fritz | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110171034 | Whiter | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110294387 | Simmons | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120164907 | Restuccia | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130005205 | Fisset | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130011653 | Whiter | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130115410 | Whiter | May 2013 | A1 |
20130175740 | Shinoda | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130266750 | Grove-Nielsen | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130280483 | Hayashi | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130330514 | Cawse | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140057096 | Moser | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140147688 | Corral | May 2014 | A1 |
20140178204 | Livingston | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140186642 | Kybelund | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140261970 | Moors | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140335361 | Ellis | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20150014883 | Yamamoto | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150017853 | Perillat-Collomb | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150336323 | Inada | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150360426 | Radanitsch | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160047252 | Merzhaeuser | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160082691 | Restuccia | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160115939 | Shair | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160167332 | Mourtazov | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160257102 | Butler | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160263844 | Smith | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170002791 | Yarbrough | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170129207 | Hollander | May 2017 | A1 |
20190010918 | Riahi | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190039337 | Nielsen | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190061290 | Whiter | Feb 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3 124 243 | Feb 2017 | EP |
WO2007038930 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2014166493 | Oct 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US18/40556 dated Nov. 15, 2018. |
European Search Report for EP Application No. 18828793.2, dated Mar. 10, 2021. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190010918 A1 | Jan 2019 | US |