Enhanced through-thickness resin infusion for a wind turbine composite laminate

Abstract
A wind turbine composite laminate component and method for producing it is disclosed as initially assembling a laminated structure having at least two reinforced layers and a plurality of interleaf layers positioned adjacent to one of the at least two reinforced layers. Then placing the laminated structure into a mold where resin is sequentially and independently transferred into each of the plurality of interleaf layers. Then curing the transferred resin in the laminated structure to form a composite laminate component having the at least two reinforced layers, the plurality of interleaf layers, and cured resin.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present subject matter relates generally to wind turbines and, more particularly, to systems and methods for infusing resin into composite wind turbine rotor blades and other wind turbine components.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Generally, a wind turbine includes a tower, a nacelle mounted on the tower, and a rotor coupled to the nacelle. The rotor generally includes a rotatable hub and a plurality of rotor blades coupled to and extending outwardly from the hub. Each rotor blade may be spaced about the hub so as to facilitate rotating the rotor to enable kinetic energy to be converted into usable mechanical energy, which may then be transmitted to an electric generator disposed within the nacelle for the production of electrical energy. Typically, the blades are fabricated from composite materials formed in a mold. For instance, carbon fiber composite, glass fiber composite, or fiber reinforced plastic preforms can be laid-up and infused with a resin to bond the layers into final form.


Composite infusions are closed-mold processes for fabricating large fiber-reinforced composite structures. In the simplest form, a laminate fiber preform is installed onto a mold surface and sealed with an outer mold surface. A vacuum is applied to remove entrapped air from the preform and resin is then allowed to infuse into the preform and cure. As typical thermosetting resins have high viscosities, processing techniques have been developed to improve the speed and quality of resin infusion. The flow rate v (m/s) of a resin can be expressed as v=−K·ΔP/μ; where K denotes permeability, an index representing the easiness of impregnation into the reinforcing fiber base material with the resin, P denotes the pressure of the resin, and μ denotes the viscosity of the resin. In this formula, ΔP represents the pressure gradient. As the value of permeability increases, it becomes easier to impregnate the reinforcing fiber base material with the resin. It can be seen that the impregnation distance of the resin is proportional to the permeability of the reinforcing fiber base material used and the pressure of the resin and inversely proportional to the viscosity of the resin.


One processing technique uses a flow medium for a faster injection of resin into a fiber layup structure in order to produce a composite. Specifically, flow media are used in order to distribute resin within a fiber layup structure and to increase the injection speed of the resin into the fiber layup structure. Depending on the geometry and the final size of the produced composite component it is often not possible to inject the necessary amount of resin without the use of a flow medium, because the flow resistance of the resin into the fiber layup structure is too large.


A large number of different flow media are known which are usable for a variety of different processing conditions. However, common for these different flow media is the somewhat labor intensive lay-up of the respective flow medium and even more so, the removal of the respective flow medium after the resin within the composite component has been cured. Furthermore, during use, the flow medium absorbs a relative large amount of resin, which must subsequently be discarded.


BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Aspects and advantages of the invention will be set forth in part in the following description, or may be obvious from the description, or may be learned through practice of the invention.


In one aspect, a method for producing a composite laminate component for a wind turbine is disclosed as initially assembling a laminated structure having at least two reinforced layers and a plurality of interleaf layers positioned adjacent to one of the at least two reinforced layers. Then placing the laminated structure into a mold where resin is sequentially and independently transferred into each layer of the plurality of interleaf layers. Then curing the transferred resin in the laminated structure to form a composite laminate component having the at least two reinforced layers, the plurality of interleaf layers, and cured resin.


In another aspect, the present subject matter discloses a wind turbine composite laminate component having at least two reinforced layers and a plurality of interleaf layers positioned adjacent to one of the at least two reinforced layers. The laminate component is configured to sequentially and independently transfer resin into each layer of the plurality of interleaf layers, and cure the transferred resin in the laminated structure to form a composite laminate component comprising the at least two reinforced layers, the plurality of interleaf layers, and cured resin.


These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following description and appended claims. The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A full and enabling disclosure of the present invention, including the best mode thereof, directed to one of ordinary skill in the art, is set forth in the specification, which makes reference to the appended figures, in which:



FIG. 1 illustrates a perspective view of one embodiment of a wind turbine;



FIG. 2 illustrates a perspective view of one embodiment of one of the rotor blades of the wind turbine shown in FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 illustrates a modeled laminated structure with exemplary interleaf layers and reinforced layers;



FIG. 4 is a schematic of an exemplary laminated structure for a composite laminate composite having independent and sequential resin feed lines;



FIG. 5 is a graph of infusion time vs. resin volume flow rate and temperature for a baseline composite and a composite having exemplary continuous fiber mat (CFM) interleaf layers; and



FIG. 6 is a table of actual and modeled component fill times for an exemplary composite embodiment.





Repeat use of reference characters in the present specification and drawings is intended to represent the same or analogous features or elements of the present disclosure.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Reference now will be made in detail to embodiments of the invention, one or more examples of which are illustrated in the drawings. Each example is provided by way of explanation of the invention, not limitation of the invention. In fact, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made in the present invention without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention. For instance, features illustrated or described as part of one embodiment can be used with another embodiment to yield a still further embodiment. Thus, it is intended that the present invention covers such modifications and variations as come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.


In general, the present subject matter discloses systems and methods for fabricating composite laminates by placing high permeability flow media interleaf layers in the thickness of the laminate stack with a dedicated resin feed line for each flow media interleaf layer. Providing a dedicated feed line for each interleaf layer significantly increases the pressure driving force through-thickness which is at least partially responsible for the fill time reduction. Infusion of resin through the composite thickness is accomplished by sequentially triggering the resin feed lines, which can also prevent defect formation in the composite structure. Also, a separation layer, such as a non-porous peel ply section, can be placed between the resin feed lines to prevent defect formation.


The term “fiber” as used herein means thin filamentous fibers, but may also be rovings (fiber bunches), bands of rovings or mats, which may be felt mats of single-fibers or mats of fiber rovings. Alternatively, fiber in the form of non-woven, melt-spun fiber mat or fabric may be impregnated with a modified polyester matrix resin to form a prepreg for use in a variety of fabrication processes. Chopped or milled fibers may also be used. The fibers used in the present invention are preferably glass fibers or carbon fibers. By the term carbon fiber is meant any of the conventional carbonized or graphitized fibers obtained by known processes from such organic fiber or filament precursors as rayon, polyacrylonitrile (PAN), pitch or the like.


The term “resin” as used herein means a natural or synthetic resin or a suitable polymer. The resin can be a combination of a liquid ethylenically unsaturated monomer and unsaturated polyester to form a polyester resin composition. The resin can also be a polyester, vinyl ester and epoxy resin. However, the resin in the context of the present invention can also be a combined system including other chemicals such as catalysts, hardening agents, accelerator and additives (e.g. thixotropic, pigment, filler, chemical/fire resistance, etc.).


The term “curing” as used herein means that the resin becomes a chemically resistant hard solid. The molecules in the resin will cross-link assisted by catalysts or hardening agents, and the process is a non-reversible chemical reaction.


The term “porous” as used herein is used to describe a material structure filled with voids or pores and relates to a three-dimensional structure allowing flow of a liquid phase in multiple directions of the structure such as a knitted, woven, needled or crocheted, foamed, or filter-like material.


The term “high permeability” is considered intrinsic permeability of a media with values ranging from 1×10−9 to 1×10−7 m2, and “low permeability” is considered values ranging from 1×10−10 to 1×10−12 m2.


Referring now to the drawings, FIG. 1 illustrates a perspective view of one embodiment of a wind turbine 10 of conventional construction. As shown, the wind turbine 10 includes a tower 12 extending from a support surface 14, a nacelle 16 mounted on the tower 12, and a rotor 18 coupled to the nacelle 16. The rotor 18 includes a rotatable hub 20 and at least one rotor blade 22 coupled to and extending outwardly from the hub 20. For example, in the illustrated embodiment, the rotor 18 includes three rotor blades 22. However, in an alternative embodiment, the rotor 18 may include more or less than three rotor blades 22. Each rotor blade 22 may be spaced about the hub 20 to facilitate rotating the rotor 18 to enable kinetic energy to be transferred from the wind into usable mechanical energy, and subsequently, electrical energy. For instance, the hub 20 may be rotatably coupled to an electric generator positioned within the nacelle 16 to permit electrical energy to be produced.


Referring now to FIG. 2, a perspective view of one of the rotor blades 22 shown in FIG. 1 is illustrated. As shown, the rotor blade 22 generally includes a blade root 34 configured for mounting the rotor blade 22 to the hub 20 of the wind turbine 10 (FIG. 1) and a blade tip 36 disposed opposite the blade root 34. A body 38 of the rotor blade 22 may generally be configured to extend between the blade root 34 and the blade tip 36 and may serve as the outer casing/skin of the blade 22. In several embodiments, the body 38 may define a substantially aerodynamic profile, such as by defining a symmetrical or cambered airfoil-shaped cross-section. As such, the body 38 may include a pressure side 40 and a suction side 42 extending between a leading edge 44 and a trailing edge 46. Further, the rotor blade 22 may have a span 48 defining the total length between the blade root 34 and the blade tip 36 and a chord 50 defining the total length between the leading edge 44 and the trialing edge 46. As is generally understood, the chord 40 may vary in length with respect to the span 48 as the rotor blade 22 extends from the blade root 34 to the blade tip 36.


In several embodiments, the body 38 of the rotor blade 22 may be formed as a single, unitary component. Alternatively, the body 38 may be formed from a plurality of shell components. For example, the body 38 may be manufactured from a first shell half generally defining the pressure side 40 of the rotor blade 22 and a second shell half generally defining the suction side 42 of the rotor blade 20, with the shell halves being secured to one another at the leading and trailing edges 44, 46 of the blade 22. Additionally, the body 38, the blade root 34, and the blade tip 36 may generally be formed from any suitable material. For instance, in one embodiment, the blade root 34 may be formed entirely from a laminate composite material, such as a carbon fiber reinforced laminate composite or a glass fiber reinforced laminate composite.



FIGS. 3 and 4 depict a portion of thick composite laminated structure 52, such as portion of blade root 34. The laminated structure 52 can have at least two reinforced layers 53 and a plurality of interleaf layers 54 positioned adjacent to one of the at least two reinforced layers 53. To eliminate the risk of premature gelling of infusion resin before the laminated structure 52 is filled, and to increase the speed of the resin flow front 72 through the laminated structure 52 thickness (i.e. eliminate slow infusion), and to reduce the risk of infusion defects, each interleaf layer 54 of the thick composite laminated structure 52 has a dedicated, isolated, and independent resin feed line 56, 58, 60 attached to it. Those resin feed lines 56, 58, 60 are sequentially opened during resin infusion, using a predetermined time delay between initiation of resin feed to each subsequent interleaf layer 54, to bring fresh resin into the interleaf layer 54 which maximizes the pressure gradient in the resin flow direction as each feed line is sequentially and independently triggered open. As seen in FIG. 4, the resin flow front 72 can be staggered in the resin flow direction such that the resin flow fronts 72 are not in the same vertical plane. Computer simulations and subcomponent field trials have demonstrated about a 38% reduction in resin fill time for a thick composite laminate 52.


For example, at the wind blade root 34 section where the thickest laminate is in a blade shell (i.e. root overbuild region), a narrow piece of non-porous (impermeable to resin) peel ply 62 can be placed directly underneath an entrance portion of each interleaf layer 54 to guide resin flow directly from the dedicated resin feed line 56, 58, 60 and avoid potential resin race tracking occurring between the root 34 end face of the laminate and the root edge dam surface. The peel ply 62 can be in the root overbuild region which can be trimmed off in a secondary operation.


The high permeability interleaf layer 54 media can be a continuous fiber mat having an intrinsic permeability in the range of about 1×10−9 to about 1×10−7 squared meters. The interleaf layer 54 acts as a structural ply and can have its own resin feed line 56, 58, 60 that can be triggered individually, independently and sequentially by a resin flow control circuit 64. A resin infusion manifold 68 can supply resin 66 through control valves 70 on each resin feed line 56, 58, 60 to sequentially trigger the supply of resin to each resin feed line 56, 58, 60, thereby providing faster resin infusion that is less prone to form infusion defects. The interleaf layer 54 structural media can be woven, knitted, open celled foam, sponge-like, mesh-like, filter-like, or combinations thereof. The interleaf layer 54 can be an elastic and/or flexible material, which can be inserted in the laminated structure 52 not only in a planar but also in a three-dimensionally curved manner, such as corrugated.


As mentioned above, laminated structure 52 filling time and the speed of the resin flow front 72 for thick laminates is primarily a function of thru-thickness intrinsic permeability (K) and pressure difference driving force, or pressure gradient (ΔP). Pressure gradient (ΔP) decreases as resin flows into the component and movement of flow front 72 becomes slower and slower. By independently, individually, and sequentially triggering intermediate resin feed lines 56, 58, 60 attached to each high permeability interleaf layer 54, the pressure gradient (ΔP) resets to maximum value and thereby filling the laminate 52 faster. High permeability interleaf layers 54 assist resin 66 flow by quickly transporting resin 66 in-plane.



FIG. 5 is a graph showing a 1st resin feed line (FL) triggered first, then the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th FL's are triggered independently and sequentially by a time delay that can be predetermined in an independent test, for example, by timing the flow front 72 to wet the one stack. In the FIG. 5 embodiment, all stacks of reinforced layers 53 are equal thickness and ply. The predetermined time delay for triggering feed line resin flow is graphed as “Percent Total Time” for sequentially transferring the resin into each interleaf layer of this exemplary laminate component. The predetermine time delay between the 1st feed line (FL) and the 2nd FL is about 15% of the total time. The feed line flow predetermined time delay between the 1st interleaf layer 54 and the 3rd interleaf layer 54 is about 25% of the total time. And the feed line flow predetermined time delay between the 1st interleaf layer 54 and the 4th interleaf layer 54 is about 40% of the total time.



FIG. 6 is a table of the laminate component 52 fill times, graphed in FIG. 5, showing the actual fill time (minutes) being reduced from a baseline actual value of 60 minutes to an actual value of 37 minutes using independent and sequential resin flow to each interleaf layer 54 as disclosed herein. The modeled fill time values closely matched the actual values with a 62 minute baseline improved to 39 minutes. Both actual and modeled results showed about 38% reduction in fill time for the exemplary component.


The method and system disclosed herein of producing composite laminated structures 52 can infuse a curable viscous or liquid resin into the interleaf layers 54 with fiber reinforced layers 53 layered in the mold. The interleaf layer 54 can be a pre-cured solid layer made of a material having a higher intrinsic permeability with respect to the resin than the reinforced layer 53. Although the same material may be used for the interleaf layers 54 as is used for the fiber reinforced layers 53, it may be advantageous if a different material is used for forming the interleaf layers 54. This can provide a desired stiffness ratio of the interleaf layers 54 to the fiber reinforced layers 53 after curing the resin. Additionally, the interleaf layers 54 may be corrugated to increase the space available for resin flow.


This written description uses examples to disclose the invention, including the best mode, and also to enable any person skilled in the art to practice the invention, including making and using any devices or systems and performing any incorporated methods. The patentable scope of the invention is defined by the claims, and may include other examples that occur to those skilled in the art. Such other examples are intended to be within the scope of the claims if they include structural elements that do not differ from the literal language of the claims, or if they include equivalent structural elements with insubstantial differences from the literal languages of the claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for producing a composite laminate component for a wind turbine, comprising; assembling a laminated structure comprising at least two reinforced layers and a plurality of interleaf layers positioned adjacent to one of the at least two reinforced layers, wherein the plurality of interleaf layers have a higher intrinsic permeability with respect to a resin than the at least two reinforced layers, the at least two reinforced layers and the plurality of interleaf layers defining a through-thickness of the laminated structure;placing the laminated structure into a mold;triggering a first resin feed line attached to a first interleaf layer of the plurality of interleaf layers so as to establish a resin flow front within the first interleaf layer;following a time delay, independently triggering a second resin feed line attached to a second interleaf layer of the plurality of interleaf layers so as to establish a resin flow front within the second interleaf layer, wherein: the second interleaf layer is vertically disposed between the first interleaf layer and mold,transferring the resin into each layer of the plurality of interleaf layers establishes a pressure gradient in a resin flow across the through-thickness of the laminated structure, the resin flow comprising the resin flow front in each of the plurality of interleaf layers,sequentially triggering the first resin feed line and the second resin feed line resets the pressure gradient to a maximum value resulting in a fill time reduction for the laminated structure relative to a baseline fill time, andeach of the resin flow fronts is in a different vertical plane, the resin flow infusing the through-thickness of the laminated structure; andcuring the transferred resin in the laminated structure to form a composite laminate component comprising the at least two reinforced layers, the plurality of interleaf layers, and cured resin.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of interleaf layers comprises a continuous fiber mat having an intrinsic permeability in the range of about 1×10−9 to about 1×10−7 squared meters.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein assembling the laminated structure further comprises placing a non-porous peel ply section adjacent a bottom of an entrance portion of at least one of the plurality of interleaf layers.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein assembling the laminated structure further comprises alternately placing each of the at least two reinforced layer adjacent the plurality of interleaf layers.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein assembling the laminated structure further comprises placing each of the at least two reinforced layers adjacent to each other.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising, supplying the resin to a resin infusion manifold comprising independently controlled outlets to the plurality of interleaf layers.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, further comprising, providing a predetermined time delay between resin flow initiation each of the plurality of interleaf layers.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, further comprising determining the predetermined time delay by measuring a time period required for at least one of the plurality of interleaf layers resin flow front to wet an adjacent reinforced layer.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of interleaf layers comprises at least one of a woven structure, a knitted structure, an open-cell foam structure, a sponge structure, a mesh structure, a filter structure, or combinations thereof.
US Referenced Citations (88)
Number Name Date Kind
3956564 Hillig May 1976 A
4519591 Bush May 1985 A
4539253 Hirschbuehler Sep 1985 A
4707317 Epel Nov 1987 A
4714575 Preston Dec 1987 A
4783506 Gawin Nov 1988 A
4868050 Tanaka Sep 1989 A
4888247 Zweben Dec 1989 A
4954382 Riefler Sep 1990 A
5028478 Odagiri Jul 1991 A
5085928 Krueger Feb 1992 A
5104718 Asada Apr 1992 A
5141804 Riefler Aug 1992 A
5190802 Pilato Mar 1993 A
5279893 Hattori Jan 1994 A
5333568 Meldner Aug 1994 A
5543212 Oosedo Aug 1996 A
5597631 Furumoto Jan 1997 A
5721034 Seemann, III Feb 1998 A
5904972 Tunis, III May 1999 A
6048488 Fink Apr 2000 A
6656411 McClure Dec 2003 B1
6670291 Tompkins Dec 2003 B1
6919039 Lang et al. Jul 2005 B2
6995099 Nishimura Feb 2006 B1
7048985 Mack et al. May 2006 B2
7081218 Sekido et al. Jul 2006 B2
7147818 Rigas Dec 2006 B1
7351040 Livingston et al. Apr 2008 B2
7727631 Fang Jun 2010 B2
8048815 Kubota Nov 2011 B2
8741198 Sekido Jun 2014 B2
9205602 Shinoda et al. Dec 2015 B2
20020167119 Hemphill Nov 2002 A1
20030011094 Filsinger et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030162461 Balthes Aug 2003 A1
20040028884 Woolstencroft Feb 2004 A1
20040140587 Hadley Jul 2004 A1
20050104259 Bannister May 2005 A1
20060178064 Balthes Aug 2006 A1
20060252334 LoFaro Nov 2006 A1
20070107220 Bakhuis May 2007 A1
20070108646 Louderback May 2007 A1
20070160479 Livingston Jul 2007 A1
20080277053 Stiesdal Nov 2008 A1
20080295955 Cawse Dec 2008 A1
20090035148 Livingston Feb 2009 A1
20090142193 Bech Jun 2009 A1
20090181250 Zmarsly Jul 2009 A1
20090229748 Berchtold Sep 2009 A1
20090280294 Branca Nov 2009 A1
20100098906 Bongiovanni Apr 2010 A1
20100170746 Restuccia Jul 2010 A1
20100189973 Mikkelsen Jul 2010 A1
20100324208 Motsanos et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110017867 Simmons Jan 2011 A1
20110142662 Fritz Jun 2011 A1
20110171034 Whiter Jul 2011 A1
20110294387 Simmons Dec 2011 A1
20120164907 Restuccia Jun 2012 A1
20130005205 Fisset Jan 2013 A1
20130011653 Whiter Jan 2013 A1
20130115410 Whiter May 2013 A1
20130175740 Shinoda Jul 2013 A1
20130266750 Grove-Nielsen Oct 2013 A1
20130280483 Hayashi Oct 2013 A1
20130330514 Cawse Dec 2013 A1
20140057096 Moser Feb 2014 A1
20140147688 Corral May 2014 A1
20140178204 Livingston Jun 2014 A1
20140186642 Kybelund Jul 2014 A1
20140261970 Moors Sep 2014 A1
20140335361 Ellis Nov 2014 A1
20150014883 Yamamoto Jan 2015 A1
20150017853 Perillat-Collomb Jan 2015 A1
20150336323 Inada Nov 2015 A1
20150360426 Radanitsch Dec 2015 A1
20160047252 Merzhaeuser Feb 2016 A1
20160082691 Restuccia Mar 2016 A1
20160115939 Shair Apr 2016 A1
20160167332 Mourtazov Jun 2016 A1
20160257102 Butler Sep 2016 A1
20160263844 Smith Sep 2016 A1
20170002791 Yarbrough Jan 2017 A1
20170129207 Hollander May 2017 A1
20190010918 Riahi Jan 2019 A1
20190039337 Nielsen Feb 2019 A1
20190061290 Whiter Feb 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
3 124 243 Feb 2017 EP
WO2007038930 Apr 2007 WO
2014166493 Oct 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in connection with corresponding PCT Application No. PCT/US18/40556 dated Nov. 15, 2018.
European Search Report for EP Application No. 18828793.2, dated Mar. 10, 2021.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190010918 A1 Jan 2019 US