Enhanced turndown process for a bitumen froth treatment operation

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9587177
  • Patent Number
    9,587,177
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, April 19, 2012
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 7, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
More particularly, the model was a dynamic simulation built in HYSYS™ v7.1. The component slate was simplified and selected to give a vapor and two liquid phases, and have the ability to measure an S/B ratio. All the unit operations were included and modeled as best fit within HYSYS™. Pumps were all modelled as standard HYSYS™ centrifugal pumps with performance curves, settlers were modelled as vertical 3-phase vessels with internal weir enabled—the overflow side of the weir is used to simulate the overflow vessels on the settlers. All proposed controllers were included with generic tuning parameters, which control the system process variable (PV) to match a set point (SP). The control algorithm incorporated master PV controllers such as S/B ratio to relate froth and solvent flows and maintain relative material balance relationship between the process streams involved. In this specific simulation, the solvent flows were assigned a slave relationship relative to the bitumen flow; that is, the solvent controller SP was reset based on the bitumen froth flow and the master S/B ratio.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to the field of bitumen froth treatment operations and more particularly to enhanced processes with turndown functionality.


BACKGROUND

Bitumen froth treatment plants historically have been designed for a given froth feed flow despite the fact that the actual flow varies significantly in response to oil sand grade variation and upstream equipment availability. Variations in feed flow, composition and temperature can result in several challenges that affect recovery and unit reliability.


Conventional solutions to variable froth flow are to coordinate start up and shut down of froth treatment operations with upstream unit operations.


In addition to the significant coordination effort related to the displacement of oil sand to ore preparation sites as well as the logistics of supplying utilities for ore preparation, bitumen extraction and tailings disposal, there are significant time delays associated with obtaining stability for each unit operation. An upset in any one unit can directly impact the production chain.


Oil sand operations are characterized by oil sand grade variations. The grade variations of the oil sand ore often range between approximately 7 wt % and 15 wt % bitumen, which is typically blended in mine and preparation operations to a narrower range between approximately 10.5 wt % and 12 wt %. This blending is dependant on equipment availability.


For some previous naphthenic froth treatment operations, dilution centrifuges were provided in parallel, the on/off operation of which permitted a range of process turndown options to adjust to froth supply variations. However, in paraffinic froth treatment operations, the large separation vessels that are used are sensitive to feed variations and upsets can interrupt efficiency of the production chain.


There is a need for a technology that overcomes at least some of the disadvantages or inefficiencies of known techniques.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention responds to the above need by providing a process for enhanced turndown in a bitumen froth treatment operation.


The invention provides a process for operating a bitumen froth treatment operation in turndown mode, comprising:

    • adding a solvent containing stream to bitumen froth to produce diluted bitumen froth;
    • separating the diluted bitumen froth into a diluted bitumen component and a solvent diluted tailings component; and
    • in response to a reduction in flow of the bitumen froth:
    • recirculating a portion of the diluted bitumen component into the bitumen froth as a recirculated dilbit component; and
    • returning a portion of the solvent diluted tailings component into the step of separating as a returned solvent diluted tailings component.


In one optional aspect, the step of separating is performed in a separation apparatus comprising:

    • a first stage separation vessel receiving the diluted bitumen froth and producing the diluted bitumen component and a first stage underflow component; and
    • a second stage separation vessel receiving the first stage underflow component and producing the solvent diluted tailings components and a second stage overflow component.


In another optional aspect, the first and second stage separation vessels are gravity settlers.


In another optional aspect, the process includes returning a portion of the first stage underflow component into the first stage separation vessel.


In another optional aspect, the process includes returning a portion of the second stage underflow component into the second stage separation vessel.


In another optional aspect, the process includes recirculating a portion of the first stage overflow component into the bitumen froth.


In another optional aspect, the process includes recirculating a portion of the second stage overflow component into the first stage underflow.


In another optional aspect, the solvent containing stream added to the bitumen froth comprises at least a portion of the second stage overflow component.


In another optional aspect, the process includes heating the second stage overflow component prior to using as the solvent containing stream.


In another optional aspect, the process includes adding a second stage solvent containing stream to the first stage underflow component.


In another optional aspect, the second stage solvent containing stream consists essentially of solvent.


In another optional aspect, the process includes subjecting the first stage underflow component and the second stage solvent containing stream to mixing to produce a diluted first stage underflow for introduction into the second stage separation vessel.


In another optional aspect, the process includes subjecting the bitumen froth and the solvent containing stream to mixing to produce the diluted bitumen froth.


In another optional aspect, the process includes pre-heating the bitumen froth to produce heated bitumen froth prior to adding the solvent containing stream thereto.


In another optional aspect, the pre-heating is performed by direct steam injection into the bitumen froth.


In another optional aspect, the process includes recirculating a portion of the heated bitumen froth back into the bitumen froth upstream of the pre-heating.


In another optional aspect, the process includes tanking the heated bitumen froth prior to pumping the heated bitumen froth to the step adding of the solvent containing stream thereto.


In another optional aspect, the process includes regulating the flows of the recirculated dilbit component and the returned solvent diluted tailings component in response to the flow of the bitumen froth.


In another optional aspect, the step of separating is performed in a separation apparatus comprising:


a first stage separation vessel receiving the diluted bitumen froth and producing the diluted bitumen component and a first stage underflow component;


an addition line for adding make-up solvent to the first stage underflow component to produce a diluted first stage underflow component; and

    • a second stage separation vessel receiving the diluted first stage underflow component and producing the solvent diluted tailings components and a second stage overflow component; and
    • the process also includes:
    • recirculating a portion of the first stage overflow component into the bitumen froth as a dilbit recirculation stream;
    • returning a portion of the first stage underflow component into the first stage separation vessel as a first stage return stream;
    • recirculating a portion of the second stage overflow component into the first stage underflow as a second stage recirculation stream; and
    • returning a portion of the second stage underflow component into the second stage separation vessel as a second stage return stream.


In another optional aspect, sub-steps (a), (b), (c) and (d) are initiated sequentially.


In another optional aspect, in sub-step (a) the dilbit recirculation stream is provided with a flow corresponding to the reduction in the flow of the bitumen froth.


In another optional aspect, in sub-step (b) the first stage return stream is returned below an hydrocarbon-water interface within the first stage separation vessel.


In another optional aspect, in sub-step (b) the first stage return stream is returned to provide a velocity of the first stage underflow component sufficient to avoid solids settling and asphaltene mat formation.


In another optional aspect, in sub-step (c) the second stage recirculation stream is provided with a flow corresponding to the reduction in flow of the first stage underflow component due to the first stage return stream.


In another optional aspect, in sub-step (d) the second stage return stream is returned below an hydrocarbon-water interface within the second stage separation vessel.


In another optional aspect, in sub-step (d) the second stage return stream is returned to provide a velocity of the second stage underflow component sufficient to avoid solids settling and asphaltene mat formation.


In another optional aspect, sub-steps (a) and (c) are performed such that flows of the dilbit recirculation stream and the second stage recirculation stream are sufficient to avoid settling of solids in respective recirculation piping systems.


In another optional aspect, the process also includes sub-step (e) of recycling a portion of the bitumen froth back upstream.


In another optional aspect, step (e) is initiated in response to an additional reduction in the flow of the bitumen from below a given flow value.


In another optional aspect, the given flow value corresponds to a minimum pump requirement flow for pumping the bitumen froth.


In another optional aspect, the process also includes two parallel trains each comprising at least one of the separation apparatus.


In another optional aspect, the separation apparatus is sized and configured to allow full standby mode.


In another optional aspect, the bitumen froth treatment operation is a paraffinic froth treatment operation and the solvent is paraffinic solvent.


In another optional aspect, the bitumen froth treatment operation is a naphthenic froth treatment operation and the solvent is naphthenic solvent.


In another optional aspect, the process also includes following a control strategy comprising flow control of the bitumen froth, the diluted bitumen component, the first stage underflow component, the second stage overflow component and the solvent diluted tailings component and the make-up solvent to maintain material balance.


In another optional aspect, the control strategy comprises acquiring flow measurements of hydrocarbon-rich streams.


In another optional aspect, the control strategy comprises acquiring measurements of solvent, bitumen, water and/or mineral content in the solvent diluted froth or the diluted first stage underflow component.


In another optional aspect, the control strategy comprises solvent-to-bitumen ratio (S/B) control.


In another optional aspect, the S/B control comprises designating a master stream relative to a slave stream in terms of the S/B.


In another optional aspect, the S/B control comprises designating a master stream relative to a slave stream.


In another optional aspect, the control strategy comprises level control of bitumen froth in a froth tank, first stage separation vessel overflow, first stage separation vessel water-hydrocarbon interface, second stage separation vessel overflow and second stage separation vessel water-hydrocarbon interface.


In another optional aspect, the level control comprises adjusting pump speed, adjusting pump discharge valve or adjusting pump bypass recirculation valve or a combination thereof to maintain a stable level.


In another optional aspect, the process includes controlling the S/B ratio in the diluted froth stream.


In another optional aspect, the process also includes following a control strategy comprising flow control of the bitumen froth, the diluted bitumen component, the solvent diluted tailings component, and the solvent, to maintain material balance.


In another embodiment, the invention provides method for turndown of a froth separation vessel for treating a bitumen froth with addition of a paraffinic solvent to produce a solvent diluted bitumen froth with a solvent-to-bitumen ratio, the froth separation vessel separating the solvent diluted bitumen froth provided at a feed flow into a diluted bitumen component and a solvent diluted tailings underflow component, wherein in response to a reduction in flow of the bitumen froth, the method comprises:

    • sustaining the feed flow to the froth separation vessel;
    • maintaining the solvent-to-bitumen ratio in the diluted bitumen froth; and
    • retaining water, minerals and asphaltenes in a lower section of the froth separation vessel while sustaining an outlet flow of the solvent diluted tailings underflow component from the froth separation vessel to provide sufficient velocities to avoid solids and asphaltene clogging.


In an optional aspect, step (i) comprises recirculating a portion of the diluted bitumen component back into the bitumen froth.


In another optional aspect, step (ii) comprises reducing the amount of the solvent added to the bitumen froth.


In another optional aspect, step (ii) comprises recirculating a portion of the diluted bitumen component back into the bitumen froth.


In another optional aspect, step (iii) comprises returning a portion of the solvent diluted tailings back into the froth separation vessel below a hydrocarbon-water interface.


In another optional aspect, the froth separation vessel comprises:

    • a first stage separation vessel receiving the diluted bitumen froth and producing the diluted bitumen component and a first stage underflow component;
    • an addition line for adding make-up solvent to the first stage underflow component to produce a diluted first stage underflow component; and
    • a second stage separation vessel receiving the diluted first stage underflow component and producing the solvent diluted tailings components and a second stage overflow component; and
    • the method includes:
    • recirculating a portion of the first stage overflow component into the bitumen froth as a dilbit recirculation stream to sustain the feed flow to the first stage separation vessel;
    • returning a portion of the first stage underflow component into the first stage separation vessel as a first stage return stream;
    • recirculating a portion of the second stage overflow component into the first stage underflow as a second stage recirculation stream to sustain the feed flow to the second stage separation vessel; and
    • returning a portion of the second stage underflow component into the second stage separation vessel as a second stage return stream.


In another optional aspect, the method includes sub-step (e) of recycling a portion of the bitumen froth back upstream.


In another optional aspect, step (e) is initiated in response to an additional reduction in the flow of the bitumen from below a given flow value.


In another optional aspect, the given flow value corresponds to a minimum pump requirement flow for pumping the bitumen froth.


In another optional aspect, the method includes two parallel trains each comprising at least one of the froth separation vessel.


In another optional aspect, the separation apparatus is sized and configured to allow full standby mode.


In another optional aspect, the method includes following a control strategy comprising flow control of the bitumen froth, the diluted bitumen component, the solvent diluted tailings component and the solvent, to maintain material balance.


In another embodiment, the invention provides a process for operating a bitumen froth treatment operation, comprising:

    • adding a solvent containing stream to bitumen froth to produce diluted bitumen froth;
    • separating the diluted bitumen froth into a diluted bitumen component and a solvent diluted tailings component; and
    • using a portion of the diluted bitumen component as a viscosity modifying agent of the bitumen froth.


In one aspect, this process may be associated or have steps or features of the previously described method or process.


The invention also provides a use of diluted bitumen derived from a paraffinic froth treatment comprising adding a solvent containing stream to bitumen froth to produce diluted bitumen froth and separating the diluted bitumen froth into the diluted bitumen and a solvent diluted tailings component, as a viscosity modifying agent of the bitumen froth.


In one aspect, the diluted bitumen is at saturation with respect to asphaltenes. A portion of the diluted bitumen may be recycled into the bitumen froth upstream of mixing of the bitumen froth and the solvent containing stream. The diluted bitumen may preferably avoid increasing asphaltene precipitation from the bitumen froth. The diluted bitumen may reduce solvent-to-bitumen ratio in the diluted bitumen froth to promote solubility stability.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a process flow diagram of a two stage froth separation unit, with recirculation lines in bold, according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a process flow diagram of a pump and valve arrangement that may be used with embodiments of the present invention.



FIGS. 3a-3c are graphs of control loop response for several variables versus time as per an example HYSYS™ simulation.



FIGS. 4a to 4e, collectively referred to herein as FIG. 4, constitute a process flow diagram of an embodiment used in an example HYSYS™ simulation.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

According to embodiments of the present invention, a froth separation apparatus is able to turn down to a recirculation mode in response to variations in froth feed supply. The process allows the ability to respond to froth feed supply variation, to commission and shut down froth treatment processing equipment independent of froth supply and design smaller and more cost efficient froth treatment equipment such as separation vessels.


Referring to FIG. 1, a froth separation unit (FSU) 10 is illustrated. In standard operating mode, the FSU 10 receiving bitumen froth 12 from a primary separation vessel (not illustrated) which separates oil sand ore slurry into an overflow of bitumen froth, middlings and an underflow comprising coarse tailings. The oil sand ore slurry has a composition dependant on the slurry preparation operation as well as the geological body from which the ore was obtained. Thus, the oil sand ore slurry and, in turn, the bitumen froth may vary in composition and flow rate. These variations may occur gradually or as a step change, often reflecting the nature of the oil sand ore body. The variations may also derive from upstream unit operation upsets in oil sand mining and extraction operations. It should also be noted that the bitumen froth, rather than coming from an oil sands mining and extraction operation, may be derived from an in situ heavy hydrocarbon operation. In situ operations involve subterranean wells located in bitumen containing reservoirs and use heat, steam, hot water, solvent or various combinations thereof to mobilize the bitumen so that it can be withdrawn through a production well. One well known in situ operation is called steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD). In situ bitumen containing streams may be subjected to bitumen froth treatment, preferably paraffinic froth treatment (PFT) to improve bitumen quality by reducing asphaltene content.


Referring still to FIG. 1, the bitumen froth 12 is supplied to the FSU 10 and preferably to a froth heater 14. The froth heater 14 may include one or more heaters in parallel and/or series to produce a heated bitumen froth 16. In one aspect, the heater 14 may be a direct steam injection heater and heating may be performed as described in Canadian patent application No. 2,735,311. The temperature of the heated bitumen froth 16 may be controlled via a heating controller 18 coupled to the heated bitumen froth and the heater 14.


The heated bitumen froth may be held in a froth tank 20 a bottom outlet 22 of which is coupled to a froth pump 24. The froth pump 24 supplies the heated froth 16 under pressure.


A solvent containing stream 26 is added to the heated bitumen froth 14. There may be a mixer 28 provided immediately downstream or as part of the addition point of the solvent containing stream 26. The mixer may include one or more mixers in parallel and/or series to help produce a diluted bitumen froth 30. The mixer may be designed, constructed, configured and operated as described in Canadian patent application No. 2,733,862. As will be described in greater detailed herein-below, the solvent containing stream is preferably an overflow stream from a downstream separation vessel, but it could also at least partially consist of fresh or make-up solvent.


Still referring to FIG. 1, the diluted bitumen froth is supplied as feed to a froth separation apparatus. Preferably, the froth separation apparatus comprises two counter-current froth separation vessels which may be gravity separation vessels. More particularly, the diluted bitumen froth 30 is fed to a first stage separation vessel 32 and is separated into an overflow stream of diluted bitumen 34 (also referred to herein as “dilbit” 34) and a first stage underflow 36 which is solvent diluted. The first stage underflow 36 is withdrawn and pumped by a first stage underflow pump 37. The dilbit 34 is provided to an overflow pump 39.


A second solvent containing stream 38, which may be referred to as make-up solvent, is then added to the first stage underflow 36. There is a second stage mixer 40 provided immediately downstream or as part of the addition point of the second solvent containing stream 38. Thus the second solvent 38 can be added immediately upstream or concurrent with the mixer. Preferably, the second solvent containing stream 38 consists essentially of solvent, which has been recovered in a solvent recovery unit and a tailings solvent recovery unit from the dilbit and the solvent diluted tailings respectively. The mixer facilitates production of a diluted first stage underflow 42.


The diluted first stage underflow 42 is then fed to a second stage separation vessel 44 which produces a second stage underflow which is solvent diluted tailings 46 which is pumped by a second stage underflow pump 47 and a second stage overflow 48 which his pumped by a second stage overflow pump 49. The second stage overflow 48 preferably contains sufficiently high content of solvent that it is used as the solvent containing stream 26 for addition into the heated bitumen froth 16. In one aspect, the second stage overflow 48 is heated in a second stage heater 50, also referred to as a “trim heater” receiving steam S and producing condensate C, prior to addition into the heated bitumen froth 16. The temperature of the bitumen froth feed 30 may be controlled via a heating controller 51 coupled to the second stage heater 50.


Still referring to FIG. 1, a recirculation system is provided in order to facilitate operating the froth treatment unit from a standard mode to a turndown mode. In a broad sense, the recirculation system preferably includes a recirculated dilbit component 52 and a returned solvent diluted tailings component 54, whether the separation apparatus includes one, two or more separation vessels. More particularly, the recirculation system preferably includes a first stage recirculated dilbit component 52 which is recirculated back into the heated bitumen froth 16, a returned first stage underflow component 56 which is returned into the first stage separation vessel 32, a recirculated second stage overflow component 58 which is recirculated back into the first stage underflow component 56 preferably downstream of the returned first stage underflow component 56, and a returned second stage underflow component of solvent diluted tailings 54 which is returner into the second stage separation vessel 44. The system may also include a recirculated bitumen froth component 60 which is recirculated back into the bitumen froth 12.


The recirculated bitumen froth component 60 may also be referred to as “froth recirc”, the recirculated dilbit component 52 may also be referred to as “1st stage O/F recirc”, the returned first stage underflow component 56 may also be referred to as “1st stage U/F recirc”, the recirculated second stage overflow component 58 may also be referred to as “2nd stage O/F recirc”, and the returned second stage underflow component 54 may also be referred to as “2nd stage underflow recirc”.


In standard operating mode of the froth treatment unit, the recirculation and return lines illustrated bold in FIG. 1 may be closed, though it should be understood that one or more of the lines may be partially open in order to keep fluid flow therethrough to reduce stagnation or fouling therein or for other process control purposes.


In one preferred aspect of the present invention, in the standard operating mode of the froth treatment unit, flow control either by direct flow measurement or inferred by calculation methods represents the primary control of key process variables (PV) which include the flow of bitumen froth 16, 1st stage O/F 34, 1st stage U/F 36, make-up solvent 38, 2nd stage O/F 48 and 2nd stage U/F 46, to maintain the process material balance. Preferably, the flow measurement selected by the control system reflects measurement reliability. For example, flow measurement of hydrocarbon or hydrocarbon-rich streams such as settler O/F is considered relatively reliable when compared to flow metering on streams such as froth or U/F. This measurement reliability combined with inline measurements of solvent, bitumen, water and mineral in diluted froth or diluted underflow streams can either allow inference or correction of erroneous froth or underflow measurements used by the control system. It is also noted that the relative volumes of the froth tank 20, the 1st stage O/F 22, and the 2nd stage O/F cause analytical measurements of bitumen, solvent, water and mineral to respond relatively slowly when compared to flow sensors which quickly sense step changes from a process turn down. The analytical measurements can be online or routine samples for off line analysis.


In addition to the key flow process variables, flow controls coupled with inline analytical measurements permit the derivation and control of key process ratios such as S/B. Designating one stream as the master stream, relative to another stream as a slave (SP) allows maintaining key process ratios to the master stream that will be illustrated in an example and permits stable turndown of operation to a froth feed interruption. By quickly adjusting flows to maintain key ratios, analytical measurement delays are mitigated and are not critical. In one preferred aspect, the flow is adjusted and the analytical measurements are used as confirmations or time averaged updates or the like.


Referring to FIG. 1, it should also be noted that all key process variables in the froth treatment process may be transferred by pumps except for make-up solvent 38 which may be supplied by valve control from the make-up solvent system. Pumps are selected for specific head-flow capacity characteristics at a specific pump speed reflecting the requirements of the process material balance which at steady state is reflected by the associated process pump maintaining consistent levels in froth tank 20, 1st stage separator O/F vessel, 1st stage separator interface 62, 2nd stage separator O/F vessel and the 2nd stage separator interface 64. Variations in the material balance are reflected in level variations in the vessels and by either adjusting pump speed or pump discharge valve or pump bypass recirculation valve changes the flow through a pump to maintain a stable level. In the event the flow through a pump is below a specific value, either minimum flow provisions are needed to protect the pump from over heating or the pump is shut down.


In addition, it should be noted as illustrated in FIG. 1, that the direct froth heaters 14 and the 2nd stage O/F heater 50 use steam to heat the process stream or fuel gas in fired heaters with stable turndown over the operating range. As both the froth heater 14 and to 2nd stage O/F heater 50 maintain the process temperature of the associated froth and 2nd stage O/F, the energy supply flow has a slave response to changes in froth or 2nd stage O/F flows. Temperature control of those streams may be set up according to achieve desired heating, mixing and separation performance.


In turndown operating mode of the froth treatment unit, the recirculation and return lines are opened as illustrated in FIG. 1. It should be noted that the recirculation and return lines may be opened according to a variety of methodologies depending on a number of operating parameters, such as operable S/B range, pressures, temperatures, flow rates, FSU setup (e.g. single or parallel trains), magnitude and rate of flow upset, type of flow upset (e.g. step change or impulse change), turndown rate, etc.


In one preferred aspect, the system is configured and process operated to respond to a step change in froth flow. In response to a step change, the recirculation system opens line 52, 56, 58 and 54 in a sequential order, as will be further understood from the description herein-below. In addition, the recirculation system is preferably managed and controlled in accordance with a desired S/B ratio for the given temperature and pressure conditions of the FSU and a consistent flow to each of the first and second stage mixers and separation vessels 32, 44. From a high-level operating standpoint, the process is operated so that a reduction of bitumen froth 12 flow results in a corresponding reduction in produced dilbit 61, produced solvent diluted tailings 63 and fresh solvent 38, while generally maintaining the flow of the streams that remain within the system. The process may include the following recirculation methodologies:


First, in response to a step change reduction in bitumen froth 12 flow, the dilbit recirculation 52 is initiated. The dilbit recirculation 52 may be provided, managed or controlled to essentially compensate for the difference in reduced froth flow to maintain the efficiency of the mixer 28 and separation in the first stage separation vessel 32. The froth pump 24 would continue to provide a flow of heated froth which is mixed with the 2nd stage O/F 26 and the dilbit recirculation 52 would maintain a generally constant flow of diluted bitumen froth 30 to the first stage separation vessel 32, and circulate a generally constant flow of high diluted bitumen 34 to the 1st stage O/F pump 39.


If froth 12 flow supplied to the FSU is reduced below the minimum froth pump requirement, an additional turndown strategy may be adopted. More particularly, the pump can continue to operate at its minimum flow requirement, but a portion of the pumped froth is recycled by opening the froth recirculation line 60. This will therefore reduce the amount of froth being provided to the mixer 28 and separation vessel 32 and, consequently, the dilbit recirculation 52 flow is preferably increased to compensate for this additional reduction is froth flow, again to maintain a consistent fluid flow through the mixer 28 to the separation vessel 32.


Increasing the dilbit recirculation 52 flow allows consistent first stage mixing and separation performance and also causes some changes within the first stage separation vessel 32. The amount of water and mineral in the incoming diluted froth stream 30 decreases and thus the hydrocarbon-water interface 62 within the settler 32 moves downward. The lower water/minerals phase is reduced and replaced by a larger upper hydrocarbon phase. It is desirable to keep the velocity of the water/minerals phase within the vessel 32 and its underflow outlet sufficiently high so as to avoid various settling and plugging issues. For instance, mineral solids can settle out of the phase if the velocities fall below a critical settling value. In addition, in the case of paraffinic froth treatment (PFT), in which asphaltenes are precipitated out with the water/mineral bottom phase, it is also desirable to keep the lower phase and underflow at a velocity sufficient to avoid formation and deposition of asphaltene mats which are difficult to break-up, clean and remove. Consequently, the first stage underflow recirculation 56 may be engaged in response to an underflow velocity set point and/or a hydrocarbon-water interface 62 level in the settler 32. The underflow recirculation may also be dependent on or controlled by the minimum flow requirement of the underflow pump 37. This 1st stage U/F recirculation maintains water/minerals and asphaltenes in the lower section of the settler 32 avoiding solids packing and plugging settler underflow outlets which risk occurring at low flow rates. The 1st stage U/F recirculation also facilitates maintaining the first underflow pump 37 above minimum flow rate and avoiding of settling in the settler 32 at low flows.


Initiating the first stage underflow recirculation 56, in turn, causes a reduction in the second stage feed flow. In response to the reduced first stage underflow flow provided to the second stage, the second stage overflow recirculation 58 may be engaged. Preferably and similarly to the first stage overflow recirculation 52, the second stage overflow recirculation 58 is provided to compensate for the reduction of first stage underflow 36 lost to its own recirculation 56.


The second stage overflow recirculation 58 contains a high concentration of solvent and thus the fresh solvent 38 flow may be decreased. It is also noted that a reduction in bitumen froth 12 leads to a corresponding reduction in solvent 38 demands.


By increasing the second stage overflow recirculation 58, the more solvent and bitumen is contained in the second stage feed stream 42 and, in turn, the relative proportions of hydrocarbon and water/minerals phases will change in the second stage separation vessel 44. A second stage hydrocarbon-water interface 64 separating the phase moves down as more hydrocarbons are present in the vessel 44. Similarly to the first stage, the second stage underflow recycle 54 is engaged to ensure that the lower water/minerals phase, which may also contain significant amounts of asphaltenes in certain embodiments, maintain a velocity to avoid clogging, plugging and asphaltene mat formation issues.


Once the transition to turndown mode is complete, the FSU may operate smoothly with constant stream flows until ready to transition back to standard operating mode.


In turndown mode, portions of the first and second stage overflow streams recirculate back as respective first and second stage feed supplies. This maintains stable feed flows to each of the froth separation vessels while facilitating unit turndown mode by replacing feed from upstream operation. The 1st and 2nd stage O/F recirculation further facilitates maintaining feed to respective FSVs at velocities at or above minimum velocities to avoid settling of solids in the respective pipe systems.


In turndown mode, portions of the first and second stage underflows are recycled back into the lower section of the respective first and second stage froth separation vessels (FSVs).


A control system 66 facilitates the recirculation controllers to automatically transition the unit operation and minimize operator intervention and associated risk of error.


According to an embodiment of the present invention, the recirculation system of the froth separation unit process streams facilitates commissioning a froth treatment unit independent of upstream operations and allows unit turndown to match variations in bitumen supply.


More particularly, a portion of the 1st stage O/F is preferably recycled back into the bitumen froth upstream of the 1st stage mixer 28. At its temperature and pressure conditions, the 1st stage O/F is saturated with asphaltenes and thus the first stage recirculation 52 replaces froth with 1st stage O/F acting generally as a diluent. In other words, the dilbit contains its maximum concentration of asphaltenes and cannot receive additional asphaltenes when mixed with the heated froth 16 and first solvent containing stream 26. By way of example, in a paraffinic froth treatment process, the dilbit may contain about ⅓ bitumen with 10% of the bitumen being asphaltenes and about ⅔ of solvent. In a naphthenic process, the dilbit contains about ⅓ naphthenic solvent. In addition, with essentially a clean hydrocarbon stream, little valve erosion ensures reliable operation in this mode.


In paraffinic froth treatment (PFT), recycling 1st stage O/F at its saturation point with respect to asphaltenes for blending with froth prior to the mixer may be performed to act as a viscosity modifying agent chemical additive that does not increase asphaltene precipitation. As 1st stage O/F is saturated with asphaltenes, reducing the S/B ratio with froth promotes solubility stability while diluting bitumen viscosity.


In one aspect, the 1st stage U/F is recycled back to the bottom of the FSV below the hydrocarbon-water interface.


In another aspect, the 2nd stage O/F is recycled back into the 1st stage U/F stream upstream of the 2nd stage mixer. As 2nd stage O/F is partially saturated by asphaltenes, replacing 1st stage U/F with 2nd stage O/F effectively dilutes the stream. The low bitumen content of 1st stage U/F mitigates asphaltene precipitation in the mixer. It is also noted that the 2nd stage O/F may be recirculated into the 2nd stage solvent feed stream prior to addition to the 1st stage U/F stream or into a combination of solvent feed and 1st stage U/F.


In another preferred aspect, the 2nd stage U/F recirc is returned back to the bottom of the second stage FSV below the hydrocarbon-water interface.


In another preferred aspect, both O/F recirc streams and both U/F return streams operate near the operating pressure of the FSU system which minimizes differential pressure across flow control valves which reduces both power and erosion in the recirc operating mode. In addition, the froth and U/F low flow transition may occur when froth and U/F pumps are at or below minimum flow requirements for the pumps and the valves redirecting the recirculation stream may only operate in an on/off mode.


In another aspect, the froth pumps 24 pressurize froth from near atmospheric pressure to FSU process pressure. The 1st stage O/F recirc could “back off” the froth pumps, in the case of variable speed control pumps, until minimum flow provisions on the pump discharge occur at which time the minimum flow would divert froth back to the froth heater.


In transitioning to turndown mode, the process may employ a number of control strategies and operating schedules. In one embodiment, the transition to turndown mode includes, for instance in response to a bitumen froth supply reduction, increasing the 1st stage O/F recirc flow rate. Maintaining a constant froth feed supply to the mixer, the variable speed froth pump reduces the flow rate of froth supplied from the froth tank. The froth pump flow reduction continues until the pump reaches a minimum flow requirement, according to equipment specifications. In order to further increase the proportion of 1st stage O/F recirc provided as feed relative to untreated heated froth, the froth recirc valve may be switched to an open position thus allowing flow through the froth recirc line.


In one optional aspect, the supplied bitumen froth is deaerated prior to heating to produce the heated froth which is pumped and blended with 2nd stage O/F, which may be referred to as “a first solvent containing stream”. To maintain a constant feed to the 1st stage FSV with froth feed variations, 1st stage O/F is recycled to froth feed which by pressure balance or similar control causes froth pumps to turn down. For paraffinic froth treatment (PFT), as 1st stage O/F is at its saturation point with respect to asphaltenes, blending with froth prior to the mixer does not increase asphaltene precipitation, however due to the volumetric flow critical line velocities above critical setting velocities are maintained while froth flow reduces. In event the froth flow is less than the minimum flow required for stable pump operation, froth is diverted back to the froth heater and an interlock valve is closed to prevent solvent flowing to the froth tank and causing a safety or environmental issue due to solvent flashing in the froth tank.


1st stage U/F is pumped and blended with feed solvent. To maintain a constant feed to the 2nd stage FSV with 1st stage U/F variations resulting from froth feed variations, 2nd stage O/F is recycled to either the 1st stage U/F as shown in the figure which by pressure balance or similar control causes 1st stage U/F pumps to turn down. As 2nd stage O/F is partially saturated with asphaltenes and the bitumen content of 1st stage U/F is limited, blending with 1st stage U/F prior to the mixer does not notably increase asphaltene precipitation, however the volumetric flow maintains critical line velocities above critical setting velocities while 1st stage U/F flow reduces. The control scheme provides maintaining the 1st stage U/F flow the minimum flow required for stable pump operation by diverting 1st stage U/F back to the FSV via an interlock valve to prevent reverse flow of solvent to the FSV and leading to safety or environmental issues.


Activation of either the froth interlock valve or the 1st stage U/F interlock valve for minimum flow protection would cause other valves noted in FIG. 1 to close placing the FSU in a standby/recycle operational mode. This includes diverting the 2nd stage U/F to the 2nd stage FSV and closing an interlock valve to maintain levels in the 2nd stage FSV and prevent plugging the 2nd stage U/F outlet.


The recirculation of 1st or 2nd stage O/F back to the respective FSVs via feed systems ensures the O/F pumps operate above minimum flow rates for stable operation.


In a preferred aspect, a control scheme responds to a step change in froth flows and as a master control strategy reduces risk of operator error in timing the appropriate control response required in the current operating strategy.


In another optional aspect, the recirculation strategy for the FSU is coupled with recirculation controls in the solvent recovery unit (SRU) and tailings solvent recovery unit (TSRU) to maintain stable froth treatment plant operations over with ranges of froth feed rates and qualities.


It is also noted that the FSU can be put on standby mode with full internal recirculation and where the effective flows for the froth, produced dilbit, produced solvent diluted tailings and fresh solvent are brought to zero.



FIG. 2 identifies a scheme where an installed spare froth or U/F pump can aid transitioning to reduced flows. In this scheme, one U/F has valves that permit the pump to recirculate the stream back to storage or U/F back to the settler vessel. The control algorithm would permit the operating pump speed to control the flow to the next unit operation. When the flow falls to a preset value, the stand-by spare pump is started with valves sequenced to route back to the feed vessel and by setting the pump at a preset speed above greater of minimum pump flows or settling in the source outlet. If the froth or U/F flow transferred to the next process continues to decline the pump is stopped and isolated by the valves.


The following legend outlines the elements in FIG. 2:

  • 68 slurry from tank or settler
  • 69 first pump isolation valve
  • 70 slurry pump (1 of 2 installed units)
  • 71 recirculation isolation valve
  • 72 second pump isolation valve
  • 73 slurry pump (2 of 2 installed units)
  • 74 third pump isolation valve
  • 75 fourth pump isolation valve
  • 76 slurry to next step or stage of process
  • 77 slurry to tank or settler


It is noted that minimum flow requirement for a pump is specific to the given selected pump and results in certain limitations to the FSV turndown possibilities. To achieve the minimum desired turndown, careful selection of pumps is preferred. Alternately, where FSU multiple trains operate in parallel, each train for example including a system as illustrated in FIG. 1, the turndown strategy can be distributed across the trains: e.g. for two trains each allowing turndown from 100% froth feed to 50% froth feed, if further turndown is required, one train is placed in full internal recirc mode and the other ramps between 100% or 50%: effectively permitting a 100% to 25% turndown in froth feed. Where two or more trains are in parallel, the control strategy could turn a first train to a minimum (e.g. predetermined) production level before turning down second or third trains in a serial manner or, alternatively, could turn all trains down simultaneously prior to placing one or more of the trains in standby mode.


It is also noted that analogous control strategies may be used in connection with SRUs and/or TSRUs.


EXAMPLE

A HYSYS™ dynamic simulation model was built and run to test the froth separation unit control and recirculation system. The results of the model test were that the control system was able to handle and control a step change drop of about 50% in feed flow from the froth tank to the 1st stage settler. The recirculation loops were able to bring flows back to the minimum flows as specified in the model. The solvent to bitumen ratio (S/B) controller was able to bring the ratio back after the initial spike due to the drop in fresh feed flow.


More particularly, the model was a dynamic simulation built in HYSYS™ v7.1. The component slate was simplified and selected to give a vapour and two liquid phases, and have the ability to measure an S/B ratio. All the unit operations were included and modeled as best fit within HYSYS™. Pumps were all modelled as standard HYSYS™ centrifugal pumps with performance curves, settlers were modelled as vertical 3-phase vessels with internal weir enabled—the overflow side of the weir is used to simulate the overflow vessels on the settlers. All proposed controllers were included with generic tuning parameters, which control the system process variable (PV) to match a set point (SP). The control algorithm incorporated master PV controllers such as S/B ratio to relate froth and solvent flows and maintain relative material balance relationship between the process streams involved. In this specific simulation, the solvent flows were assigned a slave relationship relative to the bitumen flow; that is, the solvent controller SP was reset based on the bitumen froth flow and the master S/B ratio.


With the recirculation loops incorporated into the dynamic HYSYS™ model, the simulation model was allowed to run 5 minutes to permit PVs to line out to the controller SP prior to introducing about a 50% step change in the froth feed flow. The simulation was then run for an additional 55 minutes and the added control system response as illustrated on FIGS. 3a, 3b and 3c was observed.


Step change in froth flow illustrated in FIG. 3a resulted in reducing the settler solvent flow reflecting the S/B ratio master controller which to the tuning parameters selected cause the settler solvent flow SP to over shoot, then over correct, then stabilize in about 11 minutes from the froth flow step change. During this time the 1st stage O/F recirc increases the 1st stage settler feed flow and the 1st stage U/F reduces in response to the reduced froth flow rate. With the recycle controls, the 1st stage settler in terms of O/F and U/F streams is stable about 20 minutes after the froth flow step change.


As a result of the inventory in the 1st stage separation vessel, the step change in froth flow as illustrated in FIG. 3b results in a delayed response. Again, the solvent flows are adjusted to reflect the process requirements with the solvent flow control SP reset by slave relationship and stabilize to 2nd stage settler in terms of O/F and U/F streams about 60 minutes after the froth flow step change.


As illustrated in FIG. 3c with recycle the variation in S/B PV is limited to the time frame that the 1st stage settler is stabilizing despite the delayed response on the 2nd stage separation vessel.


The added control system was able to respond to the feed step change. The recirculation controllers worked as designed and were able to bring flows back to stable flows. The S/B controller had a spike in S/B ratio from 1.6 to 2.15, but was able to respond and bring the ratio back to 1.6. Tuning of the S/B master controller and slave flow controller resulted in a faster response in S/B ratio.


In terms of model limitations, it is noted that the model used a simplified component slate. Vessels (used for froth tank and settlers) assume perfect mixing in the phases. The process lags or dead time in the model reflect inventories within process vessels without allowing for the limited piping volumes and associated inventories in paraffinic froth treatment process. Hence, the control loop responses illustrated in FIGS. 3z, 3b, and 3c could be optimized.


The control methodology concepts may be adapted and structured to auto-control other potential process supply limitations such as solvent.


In reference to FIGS. 4a-4e, the following legend outlines process elements in the simulation:

  • 100 froth valve
  • 101 mixer
  • 102 heat exchanger
  • 103 froth tank feed temperature control
  • 104 froth tank
  • 105 froth tank level control
  • 106 froth tank overhead valve
  • 107 froth tank pump
  • 108 froth tank pump valve
  • 109 froth tank minimum flow control
  • 110 froth tank minimum flow control valve
  • 111 froth tee
  • 112 dummy feed flow
  • 113 dummy feed flow valve
  • 114 mixer
  • 115 valve
  • 116 first settler feed minimum flow control
  • 117 valve
  • 118 Sampler analyzer
  • 119 S/B ratio control (master)
  • 120 first stage settler
  • 121 valve
  • 122 first stage overflow pump
  • 123 valve
  • 124 first stage settler overflow level control
  • 125 first stage settler underflow level control
  • 126 first stage settler underflow pump
  • 127 valve
  • 128 first stage settler underflow flow control
  • 129 first stage settler underflow tee
  • 130 first stage settler overflow tee
  • 131 valve
  • 132 valve
  • 133 first stage settler underflow mixer
  • 134 valve
  • 135 second stage settler
  • 136 valve
  • 137 second stage underflow level control
  • 138 valve
  • 139 first stage settler solvent flow control (slave)
  • 140 valve
  • 141 valve
  • 142 first stage settler feed temperature control
  • 143 excess solvent to second settler control
  • 144 second stage overflow tee
  • 145 second stage overflow heat exchanger
  • 146 fresh solvent flow control (slave)
  • 147 second stage settler overflow level control (master)
  • 148 fresh solvent valve
  • 149 second stage settler overflow pump
  • 150 second stage settler overflow valve
  • 151 second stage settler underflow pump
  • 152 second stage settler underflow valve
  • 153 second stage settler underflow tee
  • 154 second stage settler underflow tee valve
  • 155 second stage settler underflow minimum flow control
  • 156 second stage settler underflow recycle valve


Finally, the present invention should not be limited to the particular examples, figures, aspects and embodiments described herein.

Claims
  • 1. A process for operating a bitumen froth treatment operation in turndown mode, comprising: adding a solvent containing stream to bitumen froth to produce diluted bitumen froth;separating the diluted bitumen froth into a diluted bitumen component and a solvent diluted tailings component; andin response to a reduction in flow of the bitumen froth:recirculating a portion of the diluted bitumen component into the bitumen froth as a recirculated dilbit component; andreturning a portion of the solvent diluted tailings component into the step of separating as a returned solvent diluted tailings component.
  • 2. The process of claim 1, wherein the step of separating is performed in a separation apparatus comprising: a first stage separation vessel receiving the diluted bitumen froth and producing the diluted bitumen component and a first stage underflow component; anda second stage separation vessel receiving the first stage underflow component and producing the solvent diluted tailings components and a second stage overflow component.
  • 3. The process of claim 2, comprising returning a portion of the first stage underflow component into the first stage separation vessel.
  • 4. The process of claim 2, comprising returning a portion of the second stage underflow component into the second stage separation vessel.
  • 5. The process of claim 2, comprising recirculating a portion of the second stage overflow component into the bitumen froth and/or into the first stage underflow.
  • 6. The process of claim 2, wherein the solvent containing stream added to the bitumen froth comprises at least a portion of the second stage overflow component.
  • 7. The process of claim 6, comprising heating the second stage overflow component prior to using as the solvent containing stream.
  • 8. The process of claim 2, comprising adding a second stage solvent containing stream to the first stage underflow component.
  • 9. The process of claim 1, comprising pre-heating the bitumen froth to produce heated bitumen froth prior to adding the solvent containing stream thereto.
  • 10. The process of claim 9, comprising recirculating a portion of the heated bitumen froth back into the bitumen froth upstream of the pre-heating.
  • 11. The process of claim 1, comprising regulating the flows of the recirculated dilbit component and the returned solvent diluted tailings component in response to the reduction in flow of the bitumen froth.
  • 12. The process of claim 1, wherein the step of separating is performed in a separation apparatus comprising: a first stage separation vessel receiving the diluted bitumen froth and producing a first stage overflow component as the diluted bitumen component and a first stage underflow component;an addition line for adding make-up solvent to the first stage underflow component to produce a diluted first stage underflow component; anda second stage separation vessel receiving the diluted first stage underflow component and producing a second stage underflow component as the solvent diluted tailings components and a second stage overflow component; andwherein the process comprises:(a) recirculating a portion of the first stage overflow component into the bitumen froth as a dilbit recirculation stream;(b) returning a portion of the first stage underflow component into the first stage separation vessel as a first stage return stream;(c) recirculating a portion of the second stage overflow component into the first stage underflow as a second stage recirculation stream; and(d) returning a portion of the second stage underflow component into the second stage separation vessel as a second stage return stream.
  • 13. The process of claim 12, wherein sub-steps (a), (b), (c) and (d) are initiated sequentially.
  • 14. The process of claim 12, wherein in sub-step (a) the dilbit recirculation stream is provided with a flow corresponding to the reduction in the flow of the bitumen froth.
  • 15. The process of claim 12, wherein in sub-step (b) the first stage return stream is returned below an hydrocarbon-water interface within the first stage separation vessel and/or is returned to provide a velocity of the first stage underflow component sufficient to avoid solids settling and asphaltene mat formation.
  • 16. The process of claim 12, wherein in sub-step (c) the second stage recirculation stream is provided with a flow corresponding to the reduction in flow of the first stage underflow component due to the first stage return stream.
  • 17. The process of claim 12, wherein in sub-step (d) the second stage return stream is returned below an hydrocarbon-water interface within the second stage separation vessel and/or is returned to provide a velocity of the second stage underflow component sufficient to avoid solids settling and asphaltene mat formation.
  • 18. The process of claim 12, wherein sub-steps (a) and (c) are performed such that flows of the dilbit recirculation stream and the second stage recirculation stream are sufficient to avoid settling of solids in respective recirculation piping systems.
  • 19. The process of claim 12, comprising sub-step (e) of recycling a portion of the bitumen froth back upstream.
  • 20. The process of claim 19, wherein step (e) is initiated in response to an additional reduction in the flow of the bitumen from below a given flow value.
  • 21. The process of claim 20, wherein the given flow value corresponds to a minimum pump requirement flow for pumping the bitumen froth.
  • 22. The process of claim 12, comprising two parallel trains each comprising at least one of the separation apparatus.
  • 23. The process of claim 12, wherein the bitumen froth treatment operation is a paraffinic froth treatment operation and the solvent is paraffinic solvent.
  • 24. The process of claim 12, wherein the bitumen froth treatment operation is a naphthenic froth treatment operation and the solvent is naphthenic solvent.
  • 25. The process of claim 12, comprising following a control strategy comprising flow control of the bitumen froth, the diluted bitumen component, the first stage underflow component, the second stage overflow component and the solvent diluted tailings component and the make-up solvent to maintain material balance.
  • 26. The process of claim 25, wherein the control strategy comprises acquiring flow measurements of hydrocarbon-rich streams.
  • 27. The process of claim 25, wherein the control strategy comprises acquiring measurements of solvent, bitumen, water and/or mineral content in the solvent diluted froth or the diluted first stage underflow component.
  • 28. The process of claim 25, wherein the control strategy comprises solvent-to-bitumen ratio (S/B) control.
  • 29. The process of claim 28, wherein the S/B control comprises designating a master stream relative to a slave stream.
  • 30. The process of claim 25, wherein the control strategy comprises level control of bitumen froth in a froth tank, first stage separation vessel overflow, first stage separation vessel water-hydrocarbon interface, second stage separation vessel overflow and second stage separation vessel water-hydrocarbon interface.
  • 31. The process of claim 30, wherein the level control comprises adjusting pump speed, adjusting pump discharge valve or adjusting pump bypass recirculation valve or a combination thereof to maintain a stable level.
  • 32. The process of claim 28, comprising controlling the S/B ratio in the diluted froth stream.
  • 33. The process of claim 1, comprising following a control strategy comprising flow control of the bitumen froth, the diluted bitumen component, the solvent diluted tailings component, and the solvent, to maintain material balance.
  • 34. A process for producing bitumen from a bitumen froth treatment operation in turndown mode, comprising: adding a solvent containing stream to bitumen froth to produce diluted bitumen froth;separating the diluted bitumen froth into a diluted bitumen component and a solvent diluted tailings component;producing the bitumen from the diluted bitumen component; andin response to a reduction in flow of the bitumen froth:recirculating a portion of the diluted bitumen component into the bitumen froth as a recirculated dilbit component.
  • 35. A process for producing bitumen from a bitumen froth treatment operation in turndown mode, comprising: adding a solvent containing stream to bitumen froth to produce diluted bitumen froth;separating the diluted bitumen froth into a diluted bitumen component and a solvent diluted tailings component;producing the bitumen from the diluted bitumen component; andin response to a reduction in flow of the bitumen froth:returning a portion of the solvent diluted tailings component into the step of separating as a returned solvent diluted tailings component.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/CA2012/050247 4/19/2012 WO 00 10/28/2013
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2012/149648 11/8/2012 WO A
US Referenced Citations (231)
Number Name Date Kind
181668 Gregg et al. Aug 1876 A
654965 Franke Jul 1900 A
1085135 Kelly, Jr. Jan 1914 A
1147356 Allen Jul 1915 A
1159044 Kelly, Jr. Nov 1915 A
1201558 Cobb Oct 1916 A
1254562 Allen Jan 1918 A
1261671 Zachert Apr 1918 A
1494375 Reilly May 1924 A
1754119 Pink Apr 1930 A
1777535 Stratford Oct 1930 A
2010008 Bray Aug 1935 A
2047989 William Jul 1936 A
2091078 McKittrick et al. Aug 1937 A
2111717 Young Mar 1938 A
2188013 Pilat et al. Jan 1940 A
2240008 Atwell Apr 1941 A
2410483 Dons et al. Nov 1946 A
2853426 Peet Sep 1958 A
2868714 Gilmore Jan 1959 A
3081823 Constantikes Mar 1963 A
3220193 Sttohmeyer, Jr. Nov 1965 A
3271293 Clark Sep 1966 A
3278415 Doberenz et al. Oct 1966 A
3291569 Rossi Dec 1966 A
3575842 Simpson Apr 1971 A
3705491 Foster-Pegg Dec 1972 A
3779902 Mitchell et al. Dec 1973 A
3808120 Smith Apr 1974 A
3901791 Baillie Aug 1975 A
3929625 Lucas Dec 1975 A
3954414 Samson, Jr. et al. May 1976 A
3957655 Barefoot May 1976 A
4013542 Gudelis et al. Mar 1977 A
4035282 Stuchberry et al. Jul 1977 A
4115241 Harrison et al. Sep 1978 A
4116809 Kizior Sep 1978 A
4120775 Murray et al. Oct 1978 A
4140620 Paulett Feb 1979 A
4209422 Zimmerman et al. Jun 1980 A
4210820 Wittig Jul 1980 A
4230467 Buchwald Oct 1980 A
4251627 Calamur Feb 1981 A
4284242 Randell Aug 1981 A
4314974 Libby et al. Feb 1982 A
4315815 Gearhart Feb 1982 A
4321147 McCoy et al. Mar 1982 A
4324652 Hack Apr 1982 A
4342657 Blair Aug 1982 A
4346560 Rapier Aug 1982 A
4395330 Auboir et al. Jul 1983 A
4410417 Miller et al. Oct 1983 A
4425227 Smith Jan 1984 A
4461696 Bock et al. Jul 1984 A
4470899 Miller et al. Sep 1984 A
4495057 Amirijafari et al. Jan 1985 A
4514305 Filby Apr 1985 A
4518479 Schweigharett et al. May 1985 A
4532024 Haschke et al. Jul 1985 A
4539093 Friedman et al. Sep 1985 A
4545892 Cymbalisty et al. Oct 1985 A
4572781 Krasuk et al. Feb 1986 A
4584087 Peck Apr 1986 A
4609455 Weimer et al. Sep 1986 A
4634520 Angelov et al. Jan 1987 A
4640767 Zajic et al. Feb 1987 A
4644974 Zingg Feb 1987 A
4648964 Leto et al. Mar 1987 A
4678558 Belluteau et al. Jul 1987 A
4722782 Graham et al. Feb 1988 A
4726759 Wegnwe Feb 1988 A
4781819 Chirinos et al. Nov 1988 A
4802975 Mehlberg Feb 1989 A
4822481 Taylor Apr 1989 A
4828688 Corti et al. May 1989 A
4859317 Shelfantook et al. Aug 1989 A
4888108 Farnand Dec 1989 A
4906355 Lechnick et al. Mar 1990 A
4929341 Thirumalachar et al. May 1990 A
4931072 Striedieck Jun 1990 A
4950363 Silvey Aug 1990 A
4966685 Hall et al. Oct 1990 A
4968413 Datta et al. Nov 1990 A
5022983 Myers et al. Jun 1991 A
5039227 Leung et al. Aug 1991 A
5133837 Elmore Jul 1992 A
5143598 Graham et al. Sep 1992 A
5186820 Schultz et al. Feb 1993 A
5223148 Tipman et al. Jun 1993 A
5236577 Tipman Aug 1993 A
5264118 Cymerman et al. Nov 1993 A
5282984 Ashrawi Feb 1994 A
5298167 Arnold Mar 1994 A
5443046 White Aug 1995 A
5558768 Ikura et al. Sep 1996 A
5645714 Strand et al. Jul 1997 A
5690811 Davis et al. Nov 1997 A
5817398 Hollander Oct 1998 A
5871634 Wiehe et al. Feb 1999 A
5876592 Tipman et al. Mar 1999 A
5879540 Zinke et al. Mar 1999 A
5914010 Hood et al. Jun 1999 A
5937817 Schanz et al. Aug 1999 A
5948241 Owen Sep 1999 A
5954277 Maciejewski et al. Sep 1999 A
5968349 Duyvesteyn et al. Oct 1999 A
5985138 Humphreys Nov 1999 A
5988198 Neiman et al. Nov 1999 A
5997723 Wiehe et al. Dec 1999 A
6004455 Rendall Dec 1999 A
6007708 Allcock et al. Dec 1999 A
6007709 Duyvesteyn et al. Dec 1999 A
6019888 Mishra et al. Feb 2000 A
6036748 Wallace et al. Mar 2000 A
6076753 Maciejewski et al. Jun 2000 A
6110359 Davis et al. Aug 2000 A
6120678 Stephenson et al. Sep 2000 A
6159442 Thumm et al. Dec 2000 A
6214213 Tipman et al. Apr 2001 B1
6355159 Myers et al. Mar 2002 B1
6358403 Brown et al. Mar 2002 B1
6361025 Cincotta et al. Mar 2002 B1
6391190 Spence et al. May 2002 B1
6482250 Williams et al. Nov 2002 B1
6497813 Ackerson et al. Dec 2002 B2
6523573 Robison et al. Feb 2003 B2
6566410 Zaki et al. May 2003 B1
6746599 Cymerman et al. Jun 2004 B2
6800116 Stevens et al. Oct 2004 B2
7152851 Cincotta Dec 2006 B2
7357857 Hart et al. Apr 2008 B2
7569137 Hyndman Aug 2009 B2
7690445 Perez-Cordova Apr 2010 B2
7749378 Iqbal et al. Jul 2010 B2
7820031 D'Alessandro et al. Oct 2010 B2
7909989 Duyvesteyn et al. Mar 2011 B2
7934549 Cimolai May 2011 B2
8133316 Poncelet et al. Mar 2012 B2
8141636 Speirs et al. Mar 2012 B2
8147682 Lahaie et al. Apr 2012 B2
8157003 Hackett et al. Apr 2012 B2
8252107 Esmaeili et al. Aug 2012 B2
8261831 Lockhart et al. Sep 2012 B2
8262865 Sharma et al. Sep 2012 B2
8312928 Lockhart et al. Nov 2012 B2
8343337 Moffett et al. Jan 2013 B2
8354020 Sharma et al. Jan 2013 B2
8357291 Sury et al. Jan 2013 B2
8382976 Moran et al. Feb 2013 B2
8394180 Diaz et al. Mar 2013 B2
8449764 Chakrabarty et al. May 2013 B2
8454821 Chakrabarty et al. Jun 2013 B2
8455405 Chakrabarty Jun 2013 B2
8550258 Bara et al. Oct 2013 B2
8585891 Lourenco et al. Nov 2013 B2
20020043579 Scheybeler Apr 2002 A1
20030089636 Marchionna et al. May 2003 A1
20040074845 Hagino et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040256325 Frankiewicz Dec 2004 A1
20050150816 Gaston Jul 2005 A1
20050150844 Hyndman Jul 2005 A1
20060065869 Chipman et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060138055 Garner et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060196812 Beetge et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070125719 Yarbrough Jun 2007 A1
20070180741 Bjornson et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070284283 Duyvesteyn Dec 2007 A1
20080000810 Garner et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080185350 Remesat et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080210602 Duyvesteyn Sep 2008 A1
20090134059 Myers et al. May 2009 A1
20090200210 Hommema Aug 2009 A1
20090200688 Cincotta Aug 2009 A1
20090294328 Iqbal Dec 2009 A1
20090321322 Sharma Dec 2009 A1
20090321324 Sharma Dec 2009 A1
20100006474 Gaston et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100076236 Van Heuzen et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100078306 Alhazmy Apr 2010 A1
20100089800 MacDonald et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100096297 Stevens et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100126395 Gauthier May 2010 A1
20100126906 Sury May 2010 A1
20100133149 O'Connor et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100147516 Betzer-Zilevitch Jun 2010 A1
20100155293 Verstraete et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100155304 Ding et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100206772 Keppers Aug 2010 A1
20100243534 Ng et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100258477 Kukkonen et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100258478 Moran et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100264068 Ikebe et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100276341 Speirs et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100276983 Dunn et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100282642 Kan Nov 2010 A1
20100298173 Smith et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100320133 Page et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110005750 Boerseth et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110011769 Sutton et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110061610 Speirs et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110062090 Bara Mar 2011 A1
20110089013 Sakurai et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110100931 Lake et al. May 2011 A1
20110127197 Blackbourn et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110146164 Haney et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110174683 Cui et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110219680 Wilkomirsky Fuica Sep 2011 A1
20110233115 Moran et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110265558 Feimer et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110284428 Adeyinka et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120000830 Monaghan et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120000831 Moran et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120029259 McFarlane et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120043178 Kan Feb 2012 A1
20120074044 McFarlane Mar 2012 A1
20120074045 Stauffer et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120145604 Wen Jun 2012 A1
20120175315 Revington et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120217187 Sharma et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120288419 Esmaeili et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130043165 Revington et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130081298 Bugg et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130140249 Sury et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130168294 Chakrabarty et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130313886 Van Der Merwe et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130345485 Duerr et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140001101 Van Der Merwe et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140011147 Van Der Merwe Jan 2014 A1
20140048408 Van Der Merwe et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140076785 Penner et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140083911 Van Der Merwe et al. Mar 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (55)
Number Date Country
1027501 Mar 1978 CA
1055868 Jun 1979 CA
1059052 Jul 1979 CA
1072474 Feb 1980 CA
1081641 Jul 1980 CA
1165712 Apr 1984 CA
1247550 Dec 1988 CA
1249414 Jan 1989 CA
2075108 Jan 1994 CA
2123076 Nov 1995 CA
2165865 Jun 1997 CA
2174801 Oct 1997 CA
2232929 Sep 1998 CA
2217300 Mar 1999 CA
2272045 Nov 2000 CA
2350001 Dec 2002 CA
2353109 Jan 2003 CA
2387257 Nov 2003 CA
2527058 Mar 2004 CA
2425840 Oct 2004 CA
2454942 Jul 2005 CA
2455011 Jul 2005 CA
2751587 Jul 2005 CA
2751773 Jul 2005 CA
2520943 Apr 2006 CA
2490734 Jun 2006 CA
2502329 Sep 2006 CA
2521248 Mar 2007 CA
2524110 Apr 2007 CA
2526336 May 2007 CA
2567185 Apr 2008 CA
2610122 May 2008 CA
2610124 May 2008 CA
2573633 Jul 2008 CA
2673961 Jul 2008 CA
2582059 Sep 2008 CA
2588043 Nov 2008 CA
2606312 Apr 2009 CA
2610052 May 2009 CA
2616036 Jun 2009 CA
2630392 Nov 2009 CA
2669059 Dec 2009 CA
2638120 Jan 2010 CA
2652355 Aug 2010 CA
2657360 Sep 2010 CA
2678818 Mar 2011 CA
2701317 Mar 2011 CA
2729457 Jul 2011 CA
2733862 Jul 2011 CA
2705055 Nov 2011 CA
2768852 Nov 2011 CA
2748477 Mar 2012 CA
2752558 Mar 2012 CA
2735311 Sep 2012 CA
587798 May 1947 GB
Non-Patent Literature Citations (60)
Entry
Andrews et al. “Great Canadian Oil Sands Experience in Commercial Processing of Athabasca Tar Sands” American Chemical Society San Francisco Meeting Apr. 2-5, 1968, p. F5-F18.
Mitchell et al. “The solubility of asphaltenes in hydrocarbon solvents” Fuel, 1973, N. 02, vol. 52, p. 149-152.
Kemp, “Pinch Analysis and Process Integration, A User Guide on Process Integration for the Efficient Use of Energy”, Second edition, Elsevier 2007.
Svreck et al “Successfully Specify Three-Phase Separators” Chemical Engineering Progress, Sep. 1994, p. 29-40.
Svreck et al. “Design Two-Phase Separators within the Right Limits” Chemical Engineering Progress, Oct. 1993, p. 53-60.
Fu et al.“New technique for determination of diffusivities of volatile hydrocarbons in semi-solid bitumen”, Fuel, 1979, vol. 58, August, pp. 557-560.
Kamoun et al.“High Speed Shadowgraphy Investigations of Superheated Liquid Jet Atomization”, ILASS-Americas 22nd Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Cincinnati Ohio, May 2010.
Duan et al.'s “Numerical Analyses of Flashing Jet Structure and Droplet Size Characteristics” Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 2006, vol. 43, No. 3, p. 285-294.
Sou et al., “Effects of Cavitation in a Nozzle on liquid Jet atomization” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer; vol. 50, p. 3575-3582, 2007.
Ransom et al., “The relaps choke flow model and application to a large scale flow test”, The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Heat Transfer Division, 1980, Saratoga, New York.
Power,“Froth Treatment: Past, Present &Future” Oil Sand Symposium, University of Alberta, May 3-5, 2004.
Rahmani, “Shear-Induced Growth of Asphaltene Aggregates” Oil Sand Symposium, University of Alberta, May 4, 2004.
Paul et al. “Handbook of Industrial Mixing: Science and Practice” Wiley Interscience 2004, p. 391-477.
Blevins “Applied fluid dynamics handbook”, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company 1984, p. 80-83.
Wu et al., “Experimental study on steam plume and temperature distribution for sonic jet” J. Phys.: Conf.Ser. 147 2009, 012079.
Yeon et al., “An Experimental Investigation of Direct Condensation of Steam Jet in Subcooled Water” Journal of Korean Nuclear Society vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 45-57, Feb. 1997.
Long et al., “Structure of water/solids/asphaltenes aggregates and effect of mixing temperature on settling rate in solvent-diluted bitumen” Fuel 2004, vol. 83, p. 823-832.
Rahimi et al., “Partial Upgrading of Athabasca Bitumen Froth by Asphaltene Removal”, Unitar International Conference on Heavy Crude and Tar Sande, No. 1998.074, p. 1-8.
Hoehenberger, “Water Treatment, Cycle Chemistry, Boiler Operation and Related Problems/Failures on Steam Generator Systems > 30 bar”, TÜSÜD Industry Services, 2006, p. 1-14.
Schroyer, “Understand the Basics of Steam Injection Heating”, Chemical Engineering Progress, Hydro-Thermal Corporation, May 1997, p. 1-4.
Prosonix, “PSX Steam Jet Diffuser . . . Technology That Makes a Difference”, PSX Jet Diffuser 20110209.
Prosonix, “ProSonix Technical Bulletin”, TB-4 Liquid & Steam Pressure Relationship.
Prosonix, “PSX Technical Bulletin”, TB-7 Internally Modulated Steam Control 0210.
Prosonix, “Sparging Efficiency vs. Direct Steam Injection”, TB-6 Sparging Efficiency & Performance 20101210.
Siemens, “Pictures of the Future”, Spring 2006, Power Plants—Siemens Global Website, http://www.siemens.com/innovation/en/publikationen/publications—pof/pof—spring—2006/infrastructures—articles/power—plants.htm.
George, “Mining for Oil”, Scientific American, Mar. 1998, p. 84-85.
Speight, “Deasphalting and Dewaxing Processes”, The Chemistry and Technology of Petroleum, Fourth Edition, Chapter 19, CRC Press 2006.
Jeribi et al., “Adsorption Kinetics of Asphaltenes at Liquid Interfaces”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 256, Issue 2, Dec. 15, 2002, pp. 268-272.
Branan, “Pocket Guide to Chemical Engineering” Elsevier Science & Technology Books, Nov. 1999.
Perry, “Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook” (7th Ed.), 1997.
Clarke et al., “Asphaltenes precipitation from Cold Lake and Athabasca bitumens”, Petroleum Science and Technology, 1998, 16:3-4, p. 287-305.
Al-Atar, “Effect of Oil Compatibility and Resins/Asphaltenes Ratio on Heat Exchanger Fouling of Mixtures Containing Heavy Oil”, Master Degree Thesis report, The University of British Columbia, Feb. 2000.
Gearhart, “Rose® process offers energy savings for solvent extraction”, Proceedings from the Fifth Industrial Energy Technology Conference vol. II, Houston, TX, Apr. 17-20, 1983, p. 823-835.
Clarke et al., “Asphaltene precipitation: detection using heat transfer analysis, and inhibition using chemical additives” Fuel, vol. 76, Issue 7, May 1997, p. 607-614.
Shell Canada Limited, Application for Approval of the Jackpine Mine—Phase 1, ERCB application No. 1271285, May 2002.
Imperial Oil Ressources Ventures Limited, Application for the Imperial Oil Resources Ventures Limited (Imperial Oil) and ExxonMobil Canada Properties (ExxonMobil Canada) Kearl Oil Sands Project—Mine Development (Kearl Project), ERCB Application No. 1408771, Jul. 12, 2005.
Shell Canada Limited, Application for the Approval of Muskeg River Mine Project, ERCB Application No. 970588, Dec. 19, 1997.
Beckman Coulter, Particle Size and Size Distribution Analysis, Coulter Counter.com, pp. 1-3.
Outokumpu Technology, Slurry particle size analyzer, PSI 200 TM, 2006, pp. 1-8.
Johnson, Particle size distribution in clays, Clays and Clay Minerals, pp. 89-91.
Buckley et al., Solubility of the Least-Soluble Asphaltenes, Asphaltenes, Heavy Oils, and Petroleomics, Springer, 2007, Chapter 16, pp. 401-437.
Gerson et al., The Relation of Surfactant Properties to the Extraction of Bitumen from Athabasca Tar Sand by a Solvent-Aqueous-Surfactant Process, Chemistry for Energy, American Chemical Society, 1979, Chapter 6, pp. 66-79.
Nour et al., Characterization and Demulsification of Water-in-crude Oil Emulsions, Journal of Applied Sciences, vol. 7, issue 10, 2007, pp. 1437-1441.
Malcolmson et al., In-Line Particle Size Measurements for Cement and Other Abrasive Process Environments, for Presentation at the IEEE/PCA 40th Cement Industry Technical Conference, 1998, pp. 1-13.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/PCT/CA2012/050247 dated Jul. 10, 2010.
William L. Luyben, “Heat-Exchanger Bypass Control”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 965-973.
Dutta-B, “Principles of Mass Transfer and Separation Processes”, p. 344, 2009.
Schaschke, Carl. (2014). Dictionary of Chemical Engineering. Oxford University Press. p. 67. Online version available at:http://app.knovel.com/hotlink/toc/id:kpDCE00021/dictionary-chemical-engineering/dictionary-chemical-engineering.
Imran Ali, “Process Heating by Direct Steam Injection”, Pharmaceutical Guide; Dec. 2010.
Choung, J. et al., “Effect of Temperature on the Stability of Froth Formed in the Recycle Process Water of Oil Sands Extraction”, The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 82, Aug. 2004, pp. 801-806.
Wiwchar, K. et al., “Column flotation in an oilsand application”, Proceedings 36th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mineral Processors, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Jan. 20-22, 2004.
Cleyle, P. et al., “Column Flotation Testing at Suncor Energy Inc.”, Oilsand 2006 Conference, CD, University of Alberta, Feb. 22-24, 2006.
Finch, J. et al. “Column Flotation”, 1st ed. Pergamon Press, 1990, pp. 1-7, 75-79, 82-89, 148-149, 152-159.
Baczek, “Paste Thickening Design Evolving to Higher Capacities and Efficiencies”, International Minimizing Supplement to Paste Tailing Management, Mar. 2007. 16 pages.
Versteeg et al., “An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: the Finite Volume Method”, 2nd Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, First published 1995 and 2nd Edition published 2007, pp. 9, 33-77, 88-97, 78-87, 98-114, 115, 131-133, 156-164, 186-196, 256-264.
Ferziger et al., “Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics”, 3rd Edition, Springer, 2002, pp. 142-151, 188-206, 226-245, 265-307, 324-328.
Hobbs, D.M., “Optimization of a static mixer using dynamical systems techniques”, published 1998, Elsevier Science, Chemical Engineering, vol. 53, No. 18, pp. 3199-3213.
Godard, et al., “A Review of Suncor Energy's Millennium Extraction Process”, Proceedings 36th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mineral Processors, pp. 141-152 (2004).
Mankowski et al., “Syncrude's Low Energy Extraction Process: Commercial Implementation”, Proceedings 31st Annual Meeting of the Canadian Mineral Processors, pp. 154-181 (1999).
“Choked Flow of Gases”, O'Keefe Controls Co., pp. 38, 16-18 (2000).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140048450 A1 Feb 2014 US