Patent Application
20230117508
The present invention relates to the use of a combination of a phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor and one or more of a 5-HT4 agonist, an H3 antagonist or inverse agonist, a nicotinic α7 receptor agonist, a β3 adrenergic agonist or a TAAR1 agonist for the treatment of psychiatric and neurological disorders in which depressive, anhedonia, motivation-related or cognition-related dysfunction exists (such as major depressive disorder, bipolar I disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, addiction, anhedonia or motivation-related aspects of schizophrenia (e.g. negative and cognitive symptoms), as well as Parkinson's disease (e.g. non-motor features such depression, apathy and/or cognitive impairment).
There are many psychiatric and neurological disorders in which depressive symptoms, lack of experience of pleasure (anhedonia) or motivation-related, and/or cognition-related impairments exist. These are often difficult-to-treat features of these diseases and are predictive of a chronic and disabling course of illness. A need exists for more effective treatment in depression and diseases or disorders with a depressive, anhedonia, motivational and/or cognitive impairment component, given that even with the most comprehensive treatment regimen, only 43% of depressed patients achieve sustained remission over a one-year period (1) and this is the disorder in which the largest number of treatment options exist. The psychiatric and neurological conditions featuring depressive, anhedonia, motivational and/or cognitive impairment symptoms include major depressive disorder, bipolar depression (such as bipolar I disorder), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), addiction, schizophrenia (e.g., negative symptoms) and Parkinson's disease (e.g. non-motor features such as depression, apathy and cognitive impairment).
Importantly, these different depression-related symptoms or areas of dysfunction co-occur and may be functionally related. For example, a patient with major depression may report depressed mood, anhedonia, lack of motivation and cognitive difficulties. Likewise, the same symptoms may be reported by patients diagnosed with other conditions in which similar impairments may co-occur, such as bipolar depression, post-traumatic stress disorder or addiction. Though schizophrenia is often thought of with respect to prominent hallucinations and delusions, the depression-like negative symptoms and related cognitive symptoms are often the greater source of long-term disability and functional impairment. Similarly, though Parkinson's disease involves prominent motor dysfunction, it also frequently has highly disabling non-motor features such as depression, apathy and cognitive impairment. Hence, a treatment approach that encompasses these multiple and related functional systems would be both of importance to any one of these clinical conditions, and equally may be applicable across them.
Preclinical and clinical studies have suggested a role for cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signaling as important for depression or aspects of its symptoms, which includes anhedonia, motivational dysfunction and cognitive impairment. For example, PET imaging of the binding and activity of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4), one of the important enzymes that breaks down cAMP, showed a reduction in PDE4 activity in patients with major depression (2). This has been interpreted as a decrease in cAMP signaling at baseline, which increases after antidepressant treatment given the tight relationship between cAMP levels, downstream effects on protein kinase A activity, and consequently the phosphorylation and enzymatic activity level of PDE4 (as a self-regulatory feedback loop). Consistent with this view, injection of an inhibitor of protein kinase A into the brain resulted in a decrease in PET-measured PDE4 levels, while injection of a protein kinase A activator resulted in an increase in PET-measured PDE4 levels (3). Post-mortem studies have found alterations in other elements of cAMP-related signaling, such as adenylyl cyclase levels (4-6). A role for dysfunction in cAMP signaling has also been proposed observed in other disorders in which depressive or cognition-related dysfunction exists (such as, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia) (27-28).
Given these findings, one of the primary ways to increase cAMP signaling pharmacologically has been to inhibit its breakdown, with the primary focus on the role of PDE4. This protein is present across much of the nervous system (as well as in various peripheral tissues), making its manipulation potentially of therapeutic impact. Mice lacking subtypes of the PDE4 protein display both antidepressant-like and pro-cognitive phenotypes (7). Similarly, mice treated with rolipram, a canonical inhibitor of PDE4, show similar antidepressant and pro-cognitive phenotypes (7). The utility of PDE4 inhibitors in humans for the treatment of depression is far less clear. To date, there has not been a single placebo-controlled study of any PDE4 inhibitor in patients with depression. Likewise, there have not been any placebo-controlled study of a PDE4 inhibitor in other psychiatric disorders in which depressive, anhedonia, motivation-related or cognition-related dysfunction exists (such as major depressive disorder, bipolar I disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, addiction and anhedonia or motivation-related aspects of schizophrenia (e.g. negative and cognitive symptoms)). There have been a number of small clinical trials in depression that have compared the PDE4 rolipram to tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) medications (8-10). In none of these studies, however, did rolipram produce a greater improvement in depression than the TCA medications, and in several instances lead to significantly worse outcomes (9, 10). Moreover, even when outcomes were not statistically distinguishable with rolipram from a TCA, this was in studies far too underpowered to demonstrate non-inferiority with any statistical confidence. Roflumilast, another PDE4 inhibitor that had been developed for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, which can also reach the brain, has been found to have pro-cognitive effects broadly consistent with work on PDE4 inhibitors in animals (11-13), but there has been no evidence of an antidepressant effect.
Despite the promise for the therapeutic potential of PDE4 inhibitors for depression and related conditions, they have been held back by a limited therapeutic index due to dose-limiting side effects such as nausea and vomiting. Indeed, this limitation is so severe as to affect all clinically tested PDE4 inhibitors and occurs at such a relatively low dose (relative to percent target occupancy) so that the ultimate range between being ineffective and intolerable is too small to allow the drug to be meaningfully used for the treatment of neuropsychiatric conditions. Put differently, part of the power and promise of boosting cAMP signaling is that this second messenger is used across the entire brain, and thus has potential to improve many aspects of neuropsychiatric illnesses. But this virtue is also its main downside, as cAMP in areas such as the area postrema in the brainstem also mediates the emetic effects of PDE4 inhibitors (14). Thus far it has not been possible to achieve a potent increase in cAMP signaling in parts of the brain important for depression and related conditions using a PDE4 inhibitor (e.g. frontal cortex, hippocampus and striatum) while avoiding doing so in emesis-causing areas such as the area postrema. This has resulted in multiple brain directed PDE4 inhibitor development initiatives being terminated by pharmaceutical companies.
The principal suggestion for how the promise of PDE4 inhibition can be realized, that is by minimizing its substantial side effects, is that new drugs can be designed that inhibit particular isoforms of the protein which are more important for its therapeutic potential relative to its side effects (15, 16). Doing so, however, requires that different isoforms both have functions that can be dissociated in that way, or that small molecule inhibitor drugs can selectively target PDE4 in particular brain locations. To date, no such drugs have been identified and advanced to testing in humans. In this invention, we view this challenge differently, and detail a novel solution.
One embodiment of the present invention is a pharmaceutical composition (e.g., an oral composition such as an oral tablet or oral solution) comprising a PDE4 inhibitor (such as roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof) and at least one of a 5-HT4 agonist, an H3 antagonist or inverse agonist, a nicotinic α7 receptor agonist, a β3 adrenergic agonist or a TAAR1 agonist.
The composition may comprise (a) a PDE4 inhibitor and (b) a 5-HT4 agonist. In one embodiment, the composition comprises (a) roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and (b) prucalopride or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as prucalopride succinate). For instance, the composition may comprise (a) from about 100 to about 500 mcg of roflumilast or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast and (b) from about 0.25 to about 4 mg of prucalopride or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of prucalopride (such as prucalopride succinate). In another embodiment, the composition comprises (a) roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and (b) capeserod or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as capeserod hydrochloride). For instance, the composition may comprise (a) from about 100 to about 500 mcg of roflumilast or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast and (b) from about 1 μg to about 10 mg of capeserod or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of capeserod (such as capeserod hydrochloride).
In another embodiment, the composition comprises (a) a PDE4 inhibitor and (b) an H3 antagonist or inverse agonist. In one embodiment, the composition comprises (a) roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and (b) pitolisant or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as pitolisant hydrochloride). For instance, the composition may comprise (a) from about 100 to about 500 mcg of roflumilast or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast and (b) an amount of pitolisant or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as pitolisant hydrochloride) equivalent to about 2 to about 40 mg of pitolisant hydrochloride. In another embodiment, the composition comprises (a) roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and (b) irdabisant or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as irdabisant hydrochloride). For instance, the composition may comprise (a) from about 100 to about 500 mcg of roflumilast or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast and (b) an amount of irdabisant or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as irdabisant hydrochloride) equivalent to about 1 to about 500 μg of irdabisant hydrochloride.
In yet another embodiment, the composition comprises (a) a PDE4 inhibitor and (b) a nicotinic α7 receptor agonist. In one embodiment, the composition comprises (a) roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and (b) varenicline or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. For instance, the composition may comprise (a) from about 100 to about 500 mcg of roflumilast or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast and (b) from about 0.25 to about 3 mg of varenicline or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as varenicline tartrate).
In yet another embodiment, the composition comprises (a) a PDE4 inhibitor and (b) a β3 adrenergic agonist. In one embodiment, the composition comprises (a) roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and (b) amibegron or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. For instance, the composition may comprise (a) from about 100 to about 500 mcg of roflumilast or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast and (b) from about 100 to about 1400 mg of amibegron or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (e.g., amibegron hydrochloride).
In yet another embodiment, the composition comprises (a) a PDE4 inhibitor and (b) a TAAR1 agonist. In one embodiment, the composition comprises (a) roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and (b) ulotaront (SEP-363856) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. For instance, the composition may comprise (a) from about 100 to about 500 mcg of roflumilast or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast and (b) from about 5 to about 200 mg of ulotaront (SEP-363856) or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In another embodiment, the composition comprises (a) roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and (b) ralmitaront (R06889450) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. For instance, the composition comprises (a) from about 100 to about 500 mcg of roflumilast or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast and (b) from about 5 to about 300 mg of ralmitaront (R06889450) or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
In any of the embodiments described herein, the pharmaceutical composition may include a sub-emetic amount of component (a) (the PDE4 inhibitor).
In any of the embodiments described herein, the pharmaceutical composition may include a sub-emetic amount of component (a) and an effective amount of components (a) and (b) together to treat the intended disorder, such as (a) depression (such as major depressive disorder or bipolar I disorder), (b) a psychiatric or neurological disorder in which anhedonia, motivation-related or cognition-related dysfunction exists, or (c) one or more symptoms associated with depression, anhedonia, or motivation-related or cognition-related impairments.
In any of the embodiments described herein, the pharmaceutical composition may include an effective amount of the recited components (such as components (a) and (b)) to increase cAMP signaling.
Another embodiment is a method of treating (a) depression (such as major depressive disorder or bipolar I disorder), (b) a psychiatric or neurological disorder in which anhedonia, motivation-related or cognition-related dysfunction exists, or (c) one or more symptoms associated with depression, anhedonia, or motivation-related or cognition-related impairments in a subject in need thereof comprising administering to the subject an effective amount of a pharmaceutical composition of the present invention. In one embodiment, an effective amount of the pharmaceutical composition is administered to increase cAMP signaling. The psychiatric or neurological disorder can be post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizophrenia, addiction, or Parkinson's disease.
Yet another embodiment is a method of treating (a) depression (such as major depressive disorder or bipolar I disorder), (b) a psychiatric or neurological disorder in which anhedonia, motivation-related or cognition-related dysfunction exists, or (c) one or more symptoms associated with depression, anhedonia, or motivation-related or cognition-related impairments in a subject in need thereof comprising administering to the subject an effective amount of a PDE4 inhibitor (such as roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof) and at least one of a 5-HT4 agonist, an H3 antagonist or inverse agonist, a nicotinic α7 receptor agonist, a β3 adrenergic agonist or a TAAR1 agonist. The psychiatric or neurological disorder can be post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizophrenia, addiction, or Parkinson's disease.
In one embodiment, the method comprises administering an effective amount of (a) a PDE4 inhibitor and (b) a 5-HT4 agonist. In one preferred embodiment, the method comprises administering an effective amount of (a) roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and (b) prucalopride or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as prucalopride succinate). For instance, the method may comprise administering (a) from about 100 to about 500 mcg per day of roflumilast or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast and (b) from about 0.25 to about 4 mg per day of prucalopride or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of prucalopride (such as prucalopride succinate). In another preferred embodiment, the method comprises administering an effective amount of (a) roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and (b) capeserod or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as capeserod hydrochloride). For instance, the method may comprise administering (a) from about 100 to about 500 mcg per day of roflumilast or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast and (b) from about 1 μg to 10 mg of per day of capeserod or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of capeserod (such as capeserod hydrochloride).
In another embodiment, the method comprises administering an effective amount of (a) a PDE4 inhibitor and (b) an H3 antagonist or inverse agonist. In one preferred embodiment, the composition comprises administering an effective amount of (a) roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and (b) pitolisant or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as pitolisant hydrochloride). For instance, the method may comprise administering (a) from about 100 to about 500 mcg per day of roflumilast or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast and (b) an amount of pitolisant or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as pitolisant hydrochloride) equivalent to about 2 to about 40 mg of pitolisant hydrochloride per day. In another preferred embodiment, the composition comprises administering an effective amount of (a) roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and (b) irdabisant or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as irdabisant hydrochloride). For instance, the method may comprise administering (a) from about 100 to about 500 mcg per day of roflumilast or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast and (b) an amount of irdabisant or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as irdabisant hydrochloride) equivalent to about 1 μg to about 500 μg of irdabisant hydrochloride per day.
In yet another embodiment, the method comprises administering an effective amount of (a) a PDE4 inhibitor and (b) a nicotinic α7 receptor agonist. In one preferred embodiment, the composition comprises administering an effective amount of (a) roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and (b) varenicline or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as varenicline tartrate). For instance, the method may comprise administering (a) from about 100 to about 500 mcg per day of roflumilast or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast and (b) from about 0.25 to about 3 mg per day of varenicline or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of varenicline (such as varenicline tartrate).
In yet another embodiment, the method comprises administering an effective amount of (a) a PDE4 inhibitor and (b) a β3 adrenergic agonist. In one preferred embodiment, the composition comprises administering an effective amount of (a) roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and (b) amibegron or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (e.g., amibegron hydrochloride). For instance, the method may comprise administering (a) from about 100 to about 500 mcg per day of roflumilast or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast and (b) from about 100 to about 1400 mg per day of amibegron or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (e.g., amibegron hydrochloride).
In yet another embodiment, the method comprises administering an effective amount of (a) a PDE4 inhibitor and (b) a TAAR-1 agonist. In one preferred embodiment, the composition comprises administering an effective amount of (a) roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and (b) ulotaront (SEP-363856) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. For instance, the method may comprise administering (a) from about 100 to about 500 mcg per day of roflumilast or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast and (b) from about 5 to about 200 mg per day of ulotaront (SEP-363856) or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. In another preferred embodiment, the composition comprises administering an effective amount of (a) roflumilast, its N-oxide, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and (b) ralmitaront (R06889450) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. For instance, the method may comprise administering (a) from about 100 to about 500 mcg per day of roflumilast or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast and (b) from about 5 to about 300 mg per day of ralmitaront (R06889450) or the equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
In another embodiment, the methods described herein may include administering an effective amount of the recited components (such as components (a) and (b)) to increase cAMP signaling.
A preferred PDE4 inhibitor in any of the compositions or methods described herein is roflumilast, AVE8112 (4-(cyclopropylmethoxy)-N-(3,5-dichloro-1-oxidopyridin-4-yl)-5-methoxypyridine-2-carboxamide), MEM1414, MEM1917, apremilast, cilomilast, crisaborole, ibudilast, luteolin, mesembrenon, piclamilast, rolipram, chlorbipram, GSK-256066, E-6005, MK-0873, BPN14770, HT-0712, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof. Other suitable PDE4 inhibitors include those disclosed in International Publication Nos. WO 95/04545 and WO 2008/145840, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
A preferred 5-HT4 agonist in any of the compositions or methods described herein is prucalopride, cisapride, BIMU-8, CJ-033466, ML-10302, mosapride, renzapride, RS-67506, RS67333, SL65.0155 (capeserod), tegaserod, zacopride, metoclopramide, supride, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as prucalopride succinate).
A preferred H3 antagonist or H3 inverse agonist in any of the compositions or methods described herein is pitolisant, ABT-28, BF2.649, CEP-26401(irdabisant), GSK-189254, GSK-239512, MK-0249, PF-3654746, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as pitolisant hydrochloride).
A preferred nicotinic α7 receptor agonist for the compositions and methods described herein is varenicline, tilorone, A-582941, AR-R17779, TC-1698, bradanicline, encenicline, GTS-21, PHA-543613, PNU-292987, PHA-709829, SSR-180711, tropisetron, WAY-317538, anabasine, epiboxidine, PNU-120596, NS-1738, AVL-3288, A867744, ivermectine, BNC210 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as varenicline tartrate).
A preferred TAAR1 agonist for the compositions and methods described herein is ulotaront (SEP-363856), ralmitaront (R06889450), R05166017, R05256390, R05203648, R05263397, tyramine, amphetamine, methamphetamine, 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA), or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
Without being bound by any particular theory, the inventors theorize that a solution to this challenge is through combining a sub-emetic amount of a PDE4 inhibitor with a drug that has an additive or synergistic action with respect to increasing cAMP signaling. In other words, the goal of the drug combination is to result in an additive or greater effect through directly increasing cAMP levels while simultaneously having the PDE4 inhibitor prevent the breakdown of the cAMP that is induced. It has not previously been demonstrated that PDE4 inhibitors are effective antidepressants in humans, or that combination with any other drug increases the antidepressant effect over a PDE4 alone. As such, there is a high degree of uncertainty regarding whether a drug when administered in combination with a PDE4 can effectively treat depression. There are several significant benefits of the combination of the present invention. First, the net increase in cells targeted by the two drugs would be larger than that possible with either drug alone and at lower doses, thereby resulting in fewer side effects, side effects of reduced severity, or both. Second, in particular, use of a sub-emetic amount of the PDE4 inhibitor would ensure greater tolerability of the combination relative to the higher dose of a PDE4 inhibitor that would be otherwise required to reach the same level of cAMP increase. Third, by combining a PDE4 inhibitor with a drug that influences neurons located in a subset of brain regions (or cell types) that are subject to the ubiquitous nature of PDE4, greater specificity can be achieved. This last advantage is critical as it allows for greater cAMP elevation in a subset of cells, regions or systems such that therapeutic effect can be maximized while side effect potential is minimized. The inventors surprisingly discovered at least three novel drug combinations that can enhance cAMP signaling for the treatment of depression or related conditions.
5-HT4 agonist and PDE4 inhibitor combination: One receptor whose activation results in an increase in cAMP levels is the serotonin 5-HT4 receptor. Activation of the 5-HT4 receptor with an agonist (such as a partial agonist) has resulted in antidepressant-like effects in animals (17), suggesting effects on the brain, though no 5-HT4 agonist has been developed for the treatment of neuropsychiatric conditions. Because of the prevalence of 5-HT4 receptors in the alimentary and urinary tracts, however, agonists for this receptor have been approved for indications such as irritable bowel syndrome, and constipation. In experiments with human or pig intestinal preparations, it has also been found that a combination of a PDE4 inhibitor and a 5-HT4 agonist can result in synergistic or additive activation of neuromuscular neurons (18, 19). Moreover, brain-penetrant oral 5-HT4 agonists have been reported (20). Though 5-HT4 agonists, such as prucalopride, are not used for the treatment of depression (prucalopride is indicated for the treatment of constipation), here we disclose that the surprising combination of a 5-HT4 agonist and a sub-emetic amount of a PDE4 inhibitor can be used to treat symptoms related to depression, anhedonia, motivation-related or cognitive impairments. For example, use of 0.25-4 mg of the 5-HT4 agonist prucalopride or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as prucalopride succinate), or 1 μg−10 mg of the 5HT4 agonist capeserod (SL65.0155) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as capeserod hydrochloride), concurrently with 100-500 mcg (such as 100-400 mcg, 100-300 mcg, 100-250 mcg or 100-200 mcg) of the PDE4 inhibitor roflumilast or an equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast is one such combination. This combination can both lead to greater improvement in depressive, anhedonia, motivational or cognitive symptoms and/or lead to lower side effects compared to use of a PDE4 inhibitor such as roflumilast alone. H3 antagonist or inverse agonist and PDE4 inhibitor combination: In addition to 5-HT4, the histamine H3 receptor is also coupled to cAMP, though in this case its activation inhibits cAMP production via coupling to Gi proteins. As such, a drug that is an H3 antagonist or inverse agonist would be expected to result in increased cAMP levels. Various such H3 antagonist or inverse agonist drugs have been tested for a number of cognitive disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, dementia, schizophrenia, multiple sclerosis and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, as well as states of altered alertness such as narcolepsy and obstructive sleep apnea (21-23). No such drugs, however, have been used to treat depressive symptoms. Moreover, combination drugs including an H3 antagonist or inverse agonist have not been tested for the treatment of the cognitive and alertness disorders listed above. One embodiment of the invention is a combination of an H3 antagonist or inverse agonist with a sub-emetic amount of a PDE4 inhibitor for treatment of symptoms related to depression, anhedonia, motivation-related or cognitive impairments. An example of an H3 antagonist or inverse agonist is pitolisant, which is approved for the treatment of narcolepsy. Thus, for example, 2-40 mg of pitolisant hydrochloride or an equivalent amount of pitolisant or a different pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, or 1-500 μg of irdabisant (CEP-26401) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as irdabisant hydrochloride), concurrently with 100-500 mcg of the PDE4 inhibitor roflumilast or an equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast is one such combination. This combination can both lead to greater improvement in depressive, anhedonia, motivational or cognitive symptoms and/or lead to lower side effects compared to use of a PDE4 inhibitor such as roflumilast alone.
Nicotinic α7 receptor agonist and PDE4 inhibitor combination: Without being bound by a particular theory, the inventors hypothesized that a drug which agonizes the nicotinic α7 receptor when combined with a PDE4 inhibitor can result in an additive or synergistic increase in cAMP levels. It has been recently reported that activation of the nicotinic α7 receptor in the hippocampus results in an increase in cAMP levels by virtue of secondary effects on adenylyl cyclase, which produces cAMP (24). No nicotinic α7 receptor agonist, however, has been used for the treatment of depression, one example of which is varenicline, which is approved for smoking cessation. Of note, however, varenicline has been approved in humans for smoking cessation, and initially carried a black box for increased risk for development of depression, a seemingly opposite outcome to our goal. One embodiment of the invention is a combination of a nicotinic α7 receptor agonist with a sub-emetic amount of a PDE4 inhibitor for treatment of symptoms related to depression, anhedonia, motivation-related or cognitive impairments. Thus, for example, 0.25-3 mg of varenicline or an equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of varenicline (such as varenicline tartrate) concurrently with 100-500 mcg of the PDE4 inhibitor roflumilast or an equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast is one such combination. This combination can both lead to greater improvement in depressive, anhedonia, motivational or cognitive symptoms and/or lead to lower side effects compared to use of a PDE4 inhibitor such as roflumilast alone. β3 adrenergic agonist and PDE4 inhibitor combination: The β3 adrenergic receptor is another G-protein coupled receptor present in the brain, whose activation results in increased cAMP signaling. Most β3 agonists are not brain-penetrant, and thus have been used for peripheral adrenergic stimulation, such as is the case for mirabegron which is approved for overactive bladder. Though another β3 agonist, amibegron, is brain penetrant and had promising antidepressant-like effects in animals (25), it failed to show efficacy in two acute treatment clinical trials (as required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for demonstration of efficacy) and its development for the treatment of depression in humans was discontinued (see https://www.sanofi.com/en/science-and-innovation/clinical-trials-and-results/our-disclosure-commitments/pharma/letter-a (accessed on Jan. 12, 2021). Moreover, combination drugs including an β3 agonist have not been tested for the treatment of depression. Thus, combination of a PDE4 inhibitor with a failed prospective antidepressant in order to become an effective treatment is unexpected. One embodiment of the invention is a combination of an β3 agonist with a sub-emetic amount of a PDE4 inhibitor for treatment of symptoms related to depression, anhedonia, motivation-related or cognitive impairments. An example of an β3 agonist is amibegron. Thus, for example, 100-1400 mg of amibegron, or an equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (e.g., amibegron hydrochloride), concurrently with 100-500 mcg of the PDE4 inhibitor roflumilast or an equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast is one such combination. This combination can both lead to greater improvement in depressive, anhedonia, motivational or cognitive symptoms and/or lead to lower side effects compared to use of a PDE4 inhibitor such as roflumilast alone. TAAR1 agonist and PDE4 inhibitor combination: The trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) is another G-protein coupled receptor present in the brain, whose activation results in increased cAMP signaling. Unlike the receptors above, it is located intracellularly and not on the cell surface. To date, no drug has been approved for any indication that specifically targets TAAR1 and activates it. One such TAAR1 agonist has shown initial promise in schizophrenia (26), but no TAAR1 agonist has been studied for efficacy in treating depression. Thus, a combination of a PDE4 inhibitor with a TAAR1 agonist is an unexpected combination for yielding an effective antidepressant. One embodiment of the invention is a combination of a TAAR1 agonist with a sub-emetic amount of a PDE4 inhibitor for the treatment of symptoms related to depression, anhedonia, motivation-related or cognitive impairments. An example of a TAAR1 agonist is ulotaront (SEP-363856). Another example is ralmitaront (R06889450). Thus, for example, 5-200 mg of ulotaront (SEP-363856), or an equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically equivalent salt thereof, concurrently with 100-500 mcg of the PDE4 inhibitor roflumilast or an equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast is one such combination. In another example, 5-300 mg of ralmitaront (R06889450), or an equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically equivalent salt thereof, concurrently with 100-500 mcg of the PDE4 inhibitor roflumilast or an equivalent amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of roflumilast is one such combination. These combinations can both lead to greater improvement in depressive, anhedonia, motivational or cognitive symptoms and/or lead to lower side effects compared to use of a PDE4 inhibitor such as roflumilast alone.
Gene expression-based modeling of combination drug effects: To understand the potential utility of drug effects, the combinations described herein were assessed for two properties: complementary exposure and combination gene expression perturbations. While these properties and the results measuring these properties are described in the rest of the text, overall, these methods integrate mechanistic information about the drugs (e.g. the impact of the drug on gene expression levels in neural cells) with biological information about the indications (e.g. differences in gene expression levels between individuals with a given disease and without the disease). Each combination-indication pair was assessed for these two properties separately and shown here the results in tandem to support the utility of these drug effects.
Proximity with phenotype networks and separation between single drugs: Cellular systems operate as networks in which genes, their products, and other molecules interact to ensure proper cell function. Targeting a gene or protein has effects that extend throughout the molecular network to its downstream targets and can potentially affect entire pathways (29-30). Therefore, a systematic approach was used to analyze entire gene networks perturbed by the drug combinations. In the context of a biological network, genes within pathways perturbed by effective drugs are more likely to be closer to genes implicated in the disease and disease phenotypes than non-indicated drugs (30). Furthermore, effective drug combinations should follow a complementary exposure pattern, where each single drug targets genes that impact the disease module (where a module consists of a subnetwork where the nodes are genes implicated in disease), but different drugs target separate disease topological neighborhoods or sets of genes (31). For each combination, the proximity between the single-drug modules (where the modules consist of drug targets) and depression, cognition, PTSD, schizophrenia, addiction, Parkinson's disease, and bipolar disorder modules, as well as their separation from each other was evaluated. For this purpose, a brain-specific protein-protein interaction (PPi) network was constructed, where nodes represent genes expressed in the human brain and connections between nodes (referred to as “edges”) represent experimentally determined physical interactions between the gene products (31-33).
High-confidence disease-associated genes were identified based on mechanistic evidence from at least two published studies. All of the indications contain genes that are differentially expressed in post-mortem human brains. Additionally, for all indications except depression, genes from studies that were well supported with at least two lines of evidence were included. While one line of evidence could be genotype based (e.g. gene-based results from genome wide association studies), at least one line of evidence was also required to be functional evidence (e.g. expression quantitative trait loci, chromatin interaction studies, or gene expression studies in animal models). Finally, these gene lists were filtered to include only genes in the PPi network. The final sizes of the gene lists are as follows: 241 genes for depression (34-41), 470 genes for cognition (42-44), 26 genes for PTSD (45-55), 365 genes for schizophrenia (40, 56-64), 75 genes for addiction (55, 65-69), and 41 genes for Parkinson's disease (70-81).
To identify drug gene targets, direct target information was extracted from DGIdb (drug-gene interaction database (82)), and used these direct target nodes as “baits” by extending the module to include their first neighbors (defined as genes that are directly connected to the node in the network). The resulting modules were filtered to include only genes whose expression is impacted by the drugs of interest. These genes were assessed by gene expression data (83). Specifically, neural cell lines (neurons and neural precursor) were treated with different drugs and gene expression levels were measured post-treatment. Genes whose expression levels respond to treatment are hypothesized to be impacted (directly or indirectly) by the drug. Drugs for which gene expression data is available were chosen, with the same drug mechanism of action (MOA) as in the combinations. Specifically, gene expression data in response to rolipram was used to understand the effect of PDE4 inhibitors such as roflumilast, cisapride to understand the effect of 5-HT4 agonists such as prucalopride (both 5-HT4 agonists), ciproxifan to understand the effect of H3 inverse agonists such as pitolisant or irdabisant, amibegron to understand the effect of β3 adrenergic agonists and tyramine to understand the effect of TAAR1 agonists such as SEP-363856 (ulotaront) and ralmitaront (R06889450). For the β3 adrenergic agonists, there is no gene expression data available in the Subramanian et al dataset, so only the direct targets of amibegron were used in the analyses. By analyzing drugs that are good representatives of the mechanisms of action of the drugs of interest, the results provide evidence for the utility of combinations of other drugs in those same classes when used in combination.
To assess proximity between genes targeted by the drugs of interest and genes whose expression is perturbed in disease, a permutation-based approach as described in Guney et al. 2016 (84) and Cheng et al. 2019 (31) for non-psychiatric indications was employed. Random modules matching the drug module for size and degree (as measured by the node's amount of connectivity, specifically the number of edges associated with it) are selected 1000 times and their distance to the disease module is computed to generate a distribution of distances. The proximity of the drug module to the disease module is given by a Z-score of its distance relative to the generated distribution based on random modules, approximated by (d (drug-disease)-(d (random-disease)))/(σ(d (random-disease))) where (d (random-disease)) is the average of the distance distribution and σ(d (random-disease)) the standard deviation. A Z-score<0 indicates the drug module is significantly more proximal to the disease module than other gene sets in the network. Indeed, in these analyses, Z-scores remain stable and consistently negative or positive across multiple permutation shuffles, indicating statistical significance of the findings regarding the combinations. The proximities were computed with all the disease and cognition modules for each drug.
As shown in Table 1 (
To evaluate separation between single drugs, the separation metric as described in Cheng et al. 2019 (31) was employed, which compares the distances between nodes within each module to the distances between modules. A zero or positive separation value indicates the two networks are topologically separated and thus hit different neighborhoods of the disease network, as shown in
These results show that the drug combinations follow the complimentary exposure pattern characteristic of combinations with high effectiveness and few adverse effects (31).
Prediction of perturbed networks based on gene expression: In addition to the complimentary exposure analysis, publicly-available gene expression data (83) was used to predict perturbation networks for each single drug and combination. Currently, there is no large-scale, readily-available gene expression data for combinations of drugs. Therefore, a nonlinear approach was used that integrates single-drug data to predict combination gene expression changes as described in Wu et al. 2010 (85), which was developed to identify combinations for type 2 diabetes. First, gene expression changes in neural cells after exposure to a single drug were quantified. Specifically, using the Subramanian et al. (83) dataset for neural cell drug dosing, the ratio of expression for each gene between drug treatment to no drug DMSO control for each single drug was computed. This information was used to predict how gene expression levels would change if exposed to two drugs at the same time, on a per-gene basis, in a metric called combination expression ratio. To compute this combination expression ratio, the computed single drug expression ratios for each gene were used. If the gene was downregulated upon treatment with each single drug, then the combination expression ratio was defined as the minimum value of the single drugs ratios. If the gene was upregulated in response to treatment of both drugs separately, the combination expression ratio was defined as the maximum value of the single drug ratios. If the ratios from each of the two drugs were in opposite directions, the combination expression ratio was computed as a sum of the single drug expression ratios (derived in Wu et al. 2010 (85)). A weight for each gene was then calculated by taking the absolute value of the logarithm of the computed expression ratios. A gene was considered as “perturbed” if its weight is greater or equal to 0.2, which is equivalent to a 20% single-drug-mediated up or downregulation of expression. For each single drug and combination, the perturbed genes were mapped to the brain-specific PPi network previously constructed and the proximity of the combination modules to the depression, cognition, PTSD, schizophrenia, addiction, and Parkinson's disease modules was evaluated. As shown in Table 3 (
Summary of gene expression modeling: In Table 4 (
In vivo effects of drug combinations in humans: A human pharmacodynamic study was conducted examining brain, behavioral and subjective response to single doses of several combination drugs, or placebo. The design, involving 41 healthy individuals who received a randomized sequence of single administration of three drug combinations or placebo in a within-subject cross-over design, with an interval of at least a week between dosings. Event related potentials (ERPs) were collected to assess neural responses to the drug, measures of performance in cognitive and emotional tasks was done to assess various aspects of behavior, and subjective experience was assessed with the Bond & Lader visual analog scale, which is described in Bond, A., & Lader, M. (1974), “The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings”, British Journal of Medical Psychology, 47(3), 211-218. Assessments began approximately 2 hours after dosing in order to coincide with the point of maximal blood concentration of the drugs. The specific combinations used were: roflumilast (250 mcg)+prucalopride (1 mg), roflumilast (250 mcg)+varenicline (0.5 mg), and roflumilast (250 mcg)+pitolisant (4.45 mg).
In order to identify effects of these drugs across a substantial number of potential outcomes, and not inflate risk for false discovery, the sample was divided into a randomly selected discovery cohort (n=30) and prospective holdout test cohort (n=11). Key outcomes on the measures above were assessed in the discovery cohort and a small number selected for validation in the holdout test set. Analyses focused on effect sizes, with a drug-placebo Cohen's d effect size of 0.3 considered a positive signal for ERP and behavioral outcomes and 0.2 considered a positive signal for subjective report, consistent with accepted effect sizes in psychiatry. See Cuijpers et al., Depress Anxiety, 2014, 31(5):374-8 (PMID 24677535); Leucht et al., Br J Psychiatry, 2012, 200(2):97-106 (PMID 22297588).
The combination of roflumilast and pitolisant, shown in
Together, these data demonstrate that combining drugs that act on cAMP signaling, as disclosed herein, changes both cognitive and emotional outcomes in humans in a manner that ties to potential utility in clinical populations suffering from cognitive or emotional problems. For example, deficits in verbal memory and information processing speed are common across psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders. The mismatch negativity is characteristically blunted in schizophrenia and has been found to also be reduced in bipolar disorder. The feedback β300 in the reward task is blunted in depression. Finally, reductions in self-reported alertness and contentedness (i.e. cognitive and mood symptoms, respectively) are common features across psychiatric and neurodegenerative conditions.
“PDE4 inhibitor” refers to a compound that blocks or inhibits the activity of the phosphodiesterase 4 protein or any of its isoforms. Suitable PDE4 inhibitors antagonists include, but are not limited to, roflumilast, AVE8112, MEM1414, MEM1917, apremilast, cilomilast, crisaborole, ibudilast, luteolin, mesembrenon, piclamilast, rolipram, chlorbipram, GSK-256066, E-6005, MK-0873, BPN14770, HT-0712 and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof.
“5-HT4 agonist” refers to an agonist of the 5-HT4 receptor (including, but not limited to a 5-HT4 partial agonist), and includes but is not limited to prucalopride, cisapride, BIMU-8, CJ-033466, ML-10302, mosapride, renzapride, RS-67506, RS67333, SL65.0155 (capeserod), tegaserod, zacopride, metoclopramide, supride and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof (such as prucalopride succinate or capeserod hydrochloride).
“H3 antagonist” or “H3 inverse agonist” refers to a compound that blocks activity at the H3 receptor. Suitable H3 antagonists or inverse agonists include, but are not limited to, pitolisant, ABT-28, BF2.649, CEP-26401 (irdabisant), GSK-189254, GSK-239512, MK-0249, PF-3654746 and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof (such as pitolisant hydrochloride or irdabisant hydrochloride).
“Nicotinic α7 receptor agonist” or “alphα7 receptor agonist” refers to an agonist (including, but not limited to, a partial agonist) of the nicotinic receptor containing an α7 subunit. Suitable α7 nicotinic receptor agonist include, but are not limited to, varenicline, tilorone, A-582941, AR-R17779, TC-1698, bradanicline, encenicline, GTS-21, PHA-543613, PNU-292987, PHA-709829, SSR-180711, tropisetron, WAY-317538, anabasine, epiboxidine, PNU-120596, NS-1738, AVL-3288, A867744, ivermectine, BNC210 or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof (such as varenicline tartrate).
“β3 adrenergic agonist” or “β3 agonist” refers to an agonist of the β3 adrenergic receptor. Suitable β3 agonists include amibegron, mirabegron, vibegron, ritobegron, BRL37344, solabegron, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
“TAAR1 agonist” refers to an agonist of the trace-amine associated receptor 1. Suitable TAAR1 agonists include ulotaront (SEP-363856), ralmitaront (R06889450), R05166017, R05256390, R05203648, R05263397, tyramine, amphetamine, methamphetamine, and 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA) or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
Unless otherwise specified, the term “about” in the context of a numerical value or range refers to ±10% of the numerical value or range recited.
As used herein, “effective” as in an amount effective to achieve an end means the quantity of a component that is sufficient to yield an indicated therapeutic response without undue adverse side effects (such as toxicity, irritation, or allergic response) commensurate with a reasonable benefit/risk ratio when used in the manner of this disclosure. The specific effective amount varies with such factors as the particular condition being treated, the physical condition of the patient, the type of mammal being treated, the duration of the treatment, the nature of concurrent therapy (if any), and the specific formulations employed and the structure of the compounds or its derivatives.
As used herein, to “treat” or “treating” encompasses, e.g., inducing inhibition, regression, or stasis of a disorder and/or disease, e.g. depression, or alleviating, lessening, suppressing, inhibiting, reducing the severity of, eliminating or substantially eliminating, or ameliorating a symptom of the disease or disorder.
As used herein, the terms “subject” and “patient” are used interchangeably and refer to a human patient unless indicated otherwise.
Diagnosis of various mental and psychological disorders, including depression may be found, e.g., in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th Ed. DSM-5, American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
Methods of Treatment
Each active ingredient (such as a PDE4 inhibitor, 5-HT4 agonist, H3 antagonist or inverse agonist, a nicotinic α7 receptor agonist, a β3 adrenergic agonist or a TAAR1 agonist) may be administered by any route, such as orally, nasally, transdermally, rectally, percutaneously or by parenteral injection. A preferred route of administration is oral. The active ingredients may be administered in the form of a tablet, capsule, granules, or oral liquid.
The methods and pharmaceutical compositions described herein may be used to treat (a) depression (such as major depressive disorder or bipolar I disorder), (b) a psychiatric or neurological disorder in which depressive, anhedonia, motivation-related or cognition-related dysfunction exists, or (c) one or more symptoms associated with depression, anhedonia, or motivation-related impairments. The types of depression which may be treated include, but are not limited to, major depressive disorder, treatment resistant depression, residual depressive symptoms and dysthymia. Psychiatric or neurological disorders in which depressive, anhedonia, motivation-related or cognitive-related dysfunction exists which may be treated include, but are not limited to, depression as part of bipolar I or bipolar II disorders, addiction (e.g., drug addiction), post-traumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia (in particular associated negative or cognitive symptoms) or Parkinson's Disease (non-motor features such as depression, apathy or cognitive impairment). In one embodiment, the method treats one or more non-motor features of Parkinson's disease. Symptoms associated with depression which may be treated include, but are not limited to, depressed mood, blunted affect, anhedonia, alexithymia, and apathy. Motivation-related impairments which may be treated include, but are not limited to, inability to engage in previously rewarding experiences, reduced social interest or drive, inattentiveness to social inputs, reduced psychomotor activity, excessive sleep, avoidance of activities or social interactions, and decreased appetite. Cognitive impairment includes, but is not limited to, inability to focus on attentionally-demanding tasks, poor executive functioning, difficulties in inhibiting inappropriate response and deficits in memory formation or recall.
Generally, the amount of the active ingredients to be administered is sufficient to increase cAMP molecular signaling in the brain. In one embodiment, the amount of each component to be administered daily can be as shown in the table below.
In one embodiment, a sub-emetic amount of the PDE4 inhibitor is administered. In a preferred embodiment, an amount of the PDE4 inhibitor is administered which generally does not produce nausea or vomiting in the subject. In another embodiment, an amount of the PDE4 inhibitor is administered which does not evoke vomiting in the subject.
In accordance with the practice of the invention, each active ingredient can be administered one or more times a day, daily, weekly, monthly or yearly.
Pharmaceutical Compositions
The pharmaceutical composition can include a sub-emetic amount of the PDE4 inhibitor. In a preferred embodiment, the composition includes an amount of the PDE4 inhibitor which when administered (e.g., orally administered) generally does not produce nausea or vomiting in the subject. In another embodiment, the composition includes an amount of the PDE4 inhibitor which when administered (e.g., orally administered) does not evoke vomiting in the subject. In yet another embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition includes an amount of the PDE4 inhibitor and the other active ingredient as recited in the table provided above for one day. In yet another embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition includes an amount of the PDE4 inhibitor and the other active ingredient which when administered twice a day is equivalent to the total daily amount recited in the table provided above.
The pharmaceutical composition can include one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients in addition to the active ingredients. The pharmaceutical composition may be suitable for any route of administration, such as nasal, rectal, intercisternal, buccal, intramuscular, intrasternal, intracutaneous, intrasynovial, intravenous, intraperitoneal, intraocular, periosteal, intra-articular injection, infusion, oral, topical, inhalation, parenteral, subcutaneous, implantable pump, continuous infusion, gene therapy, intranasal, intrathecal, intracerebroventricular, transdermal, or by spray, patch or injection.
The pharmaceutical composition may be formulated as a solid dosage form, such as capsules, pills, soft-gels, tablets, caplets, troches, wafer, sprinkle, or chewing for oral administration. The pharmaceutical composition may also be formulated as a liquid dosage form such as an elixir, suspension or syrup.
The pharmaceutical composition may also be presented in a dosage form for transdermal application (e.g., a patch or an ointment) or oral administration.
The pharmaceutical composition may be in a liquid dosage form or a suspension to be applied to nasal cavity or oral cavity using a dropper, a sprayer or a container. The pharmaceutical composition may be in a solid, salt or powder to be applied to nasal cavity or oral cavity using a sprayer, forced air or a container.
The pharmaceutical acceptable excipient may be selected from pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, binders, diluents, adjuvants, or vehicles, such as preserving agents, fillers, polymers, disintegrating agents, glidants, wetting agents, emulsifying agents, suspending agents, sweetening agents, flavoring agents, perfuming agents, lubricating agents (such as magnesium stearate), acidifying agents, coloring agent, dyes, preservatives and dispensing agents. Such pharmaceutically acceptable excipients are described in the Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients, 6th Ed., Pharmaceutical Press and American Pharmaceutical Association (2009).
Pharmaceutically acceptable carriers are generally non-toxic to recipients at the dosages and concentrations employed and are compatible with other ingredients of the formulation. Examples of pharmaceutically acceptable carriers include water, saline, dextrose solution, ethanol, polyols, vegetable oils, fats, ethyl oleate, liposomes, waxes polymers, including gel forming and non-gel forming polymers, and suitable mixtures thereof. The carrier may contain minor amounts of additives such as substances that enhance isotonicity and chemical stability. Such materials are non-toxic to recipients at the dosages and concentrations employed, and include buffers such as phosphate, citrate, succinate, acetic acid, and other organic acids or their salts; antioxidants such as ascorbic acid; low molecular weight (less than about ten residues) polypeptides, e.g., polyarginine or tripeptides; proteins, such as serum albumin, gelatin, or immunoglobulin; hydrophilic polymers such as polyvinylpyrrolidone; amino acids, such as glycine, glutamic acid, aspartic acid, or arginine; monosaccharides, disaccharides, and other carbohydrates including cellulose or its derivatives, glucose, mannose, or dextrins; chelating agents such as EDTA; sugar alcohols such as mannitol or sorbitol; counterions such as sodium; and/or nonionic surfactants such as polysorbates, poloxamers, or PEG.
Examples of binders include, but are not limited to, microcrystalline cellulose and cellulose derivatives, gum tragacanth, glucose solution, acacia mucilage, gelatin solution, molasses, polyvinylpyrrolidone, povidone, crospovidone, sucrose and starch paste.
Examples of diluents include, but are not limited to, lactose, sucrose, starch, kaolin, salt, mannitol and dicalcium phosphate.
Examples of excipients include, but are not limited to, starch, surfactants, lipophilic vehicles, hydrophobic vehicles, pregelatinized starch, microcrystalline cellulose, lactose, milk sugar, sodium citrate, calcium carbonate, and dicalcium phosphate. Typical excipients for dosage forms such as a soft-gel include gelatin for the capsule and oils such as soy oil, rice bran oil, canola oil, olive oil, corn oil, and other similar oils; glycerol, polyethylene glycol liquids, and vitamin E TPGS as a surfactant.
Examples of disintegrating agents include, but are not limited to, complex silicates, croscarmellose sodium, sodium starch glycolate, alginic acid, corn starch, potato starch, bentonite, methylcellulose, agar and carboxymethylcellulose.
Examples of glidants include, but are not limited to, colloidal silicon dioxide, talc, corn starch.
Examples of wetting agents include, but are not limited to, propylene glycol monostearate, sorbitan monooleate, diethylene glycol monolaurate and polyoxyethylene laural ether.
Examples of lubricants include magnesium or calcium stearate, sodium lauryl sulphate, talc, starch, lycopodium and stearic acid as well as high molecular weight polyethylene glycols.
All references cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference.
This application is a continuation-in-part of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2022/013197, filed Jan. 20, 2022, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/199,728 filed Jan. 20, 2021, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63199728 | Jan 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/US22/13197 | Jan 2022 | US |
| Child | 18063907 | US |
