Enhancement of immune response

Abstract

The present invention provides an improved means for regulating the immune response, for ameliorating effects of stress, and for avoiding untoward effects of chemotherapy or exposure to irradiation by administration of androstenediol (AED) and androstenetriol (AET). The improved means of regulating immune response can be utilized in treating infectious diseases and immune diseases such as diabetes and chronic fatigue syndrome, both diseases now considered to be immune response related syndromes.

Description

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides an improved means for regulating the immune response, for ameliorating effects of stress, and for avoiding untoward effects of chemotherapy or exposure to irradiation by administration of androstenediol (AED) and androstenetriol (AET).

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

In mammals the development of host protection against pathogens requires a selective host immune response that involves the mobilization of the humoral and/or cellular mediated immune responses. Several factors adversely affect the body's protective response capability by causing prolonged immuno-suppression or "down-regulation" of the immune system. It is, in reality, more appropriate to speak of "mal-regulation" or "deregulation" of the immune system than of "down-regulation" since the result is a failure to protect the body from assault. Immuno-suppression provides an opportunity for pathogens to grow in the host. It does not matter what causes the primary insult to immunity. The resulting inability to muster the appropriate immune response has the same effect. Among the causes of immuno-suppression are viral, bacterial, fungal, and parasitic infections, chemotherapy, irradiation, severe stress, and some forms of steroid therapy. It has long been known that patients receiving steroid hormones of adrenocortical origin at pharmacologically appropriate doses show increased incidence of infectious disease. A. S. Fauci, immunolo.rev. 65, 133-155 (1982); and J. E. Parillo and A. S. Fauci, Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 19, 179-201 (1979)

Dehydroepiandrosterone, also known as 3-.beta.-hydroxyandrost-5-en-17-one or dehydroiso-androsterone (referred to hereinafter as DHEA), is a 17-ketosteroid which is quantitatively one of the major adrenocortical steroid hormones found in mammals. M. E. Windholz, The Merck Index, Ninth Edition (1976); K. Diem and C. Lentner, Geigy Scientific Tables (1975). (Although DHEA appears to serve as an intermediary in gonadal steroid synthesis, the primary physiological function of DHEA has not been fully understood. It has been known, however, that levels of this hormone begin to decline in the second decade of life, reaching 5% of the original level in the elderly.)

Clinically, DHEA has been used systemically and/or topically for treating patients suffering from psoriasis, gout, hyperlipemia, and in has been administered to postcoronary patients. W. Regelson et al., New York Academy of Sciences 518, 260-273 (1988). In mammals DHEA has been shown to have weight optimizing and anticarcinogenic effects.

DHEA has been used clinically in Europe in conjunction with estrogen as an agent to reverse menopausal symptoms and also has been used in the treatment of manic depression, schizophrenia, and Alzheimer's disease. DHEA has also been used clinically at 40 mg/kg/day in the treatment of advanced cancer and multiple sclerosis. (Regelson, supra) Mild androgenic effects, hirsutism, and increased libido were the side effects observed. These side effects can be overcome by monitoring the dose and/or by using analogues.

Co-pending U.S. Patent application Ser. No. 291,969, filed Dec. 30, 1988, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,077,284, Dec. 31, 1991, and entitled "Use of Dehydroepiandrosterone to Improve Immune Response," describes the subcutaneous or oral administration of DHEA to improve the host's response to viral infections. The disclosure of this copending application is expressly incorporated by reference herein.

It is now disclosed that DHEA is a precursor in a metabolic pathway which ultimately leads to more powerful agents that increase immune response in mammals. That is, DHEA acts as a biphasic compound: it acts as an immunomodulator when converted to androstenediol (5 androstene, 3.beta., 17.beta. diol hereinafter referred to as BAED) or androstenetriol (5 androstene 3.beta., 7.beta., 17.beta. triol hereinafter referred to as .beta.AET), but in vitro has a lymphotoxic and suppressive effect on cell proliferation prior to its conversion to .beta.AED and/or .beta.AET. It is, therefore, now understood that administration of DHEA shows superior immunity enhancing properties as a result of its partial conversion to a more active metabolite.

An agent that would advance the protective regulation of the immune system without giving rise to undesirable side effects seen with DHEA administration would provide particularly advantageous improvement of host resistance against infection. Protective regulation of the immune system could then be effected using lower doses of the active agent, and would provide more immediate response with a wider range of protection.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, illustrate advantageous use of the invention. They are intended for use in explaining and exemplifying the invention and should not be considered as limitations to scope of the invention

FIG. 1 is a chart illustrating the metabolism of .beta.AED by normal human skin, in vivo.

FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating the effects of .beta.AED injection on the percent cumulative mortality of SWR/J mice following Coxsackievirus B4 infection.

FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating the effects of 50 .mu.M DHEA and .beta.AED on cell viability after 5 days in culture.

FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating the effects of in vivo injection of DHEA or .beta.AED on the proliferation of spleen cells (in vitro) stimulated with concavalin A.

FIG 5 is a chart illustrating host/virus interaction with DHEA and .beta.AED.

FIG. 6 is a chart illustrating dose response of the SWR/J inbred mouse to .beta.AED and the determination of the 50% effective dose (ED50).

FIG. 7 is a chart illustrating the effects of .beta.AED on organ weight.

FIG. 8 is a chart illustrating the effects of .beta.AED on organ/body weight ratios.

FIG. 9 illustrates the effects of .alpha.AET and .sym.AET on host resistance to a lethal infection with Coxsackievirus B4.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides compounds and compositions useful for enhancing the protective response of the immune system against infections. The medicinal compositions of the invention are also useful for treating other complications often accompanying immune suppression.

The present invention provides means of synthesizing both .alpha. and .beta. sterio isomers of AET. Both isomers are present in the body (see FIG. 1). It is now known that the .beta.AET is the active agent in regulation of immune response. In addition to the medicinal compositions, the invention encompasses analogues and derivatives of .beta.AED and .beta.AET. As indicated later in the exemplification of synthetic techniques, some of the substituted compounds are useful as starting materials or intermediates in making .beta.AED and .beta.AET. .beta.AED and .beta.AET may also be substituted with protective groups which, on hydrolysis yield .beta.AED or .beta.AET. Hence, acylated and alkylated derivatives are useful as precursors to the .beta.AED and .beta.AET. Such compounds are these of the formula: ##STR1## wherein R.sub.1 may be H, alkenyl of 2-8 carbons, alkyl of 1-8 carbons, benzyl, phenyl or COR.sub.2, wherein R.sub.2 is H, alkyl of 1-8 carbons, alkenyl of 2-8 carbons, benzyl, or phenyl. The phenyl moiety (including the phenyl moiety on the benzyl substituent) may have up to three substituents chosen from among hydroxy, carboxy of 1-4 carbons, halo, alkoxy of 1-4 carbons, alkyl of 1-4 carbons, or alkenyl of 2-4 carbons.

Using .beta.AED and .beta.AET, down-stream products of DHEA, avoids certain side effects resulting from use of DHEA. The use of .beta.AED and .beta.AET avoids or minimizes the androgenic side effects that occur when the precursor DHEA is administered. With .beta.AED and .beta.AET it is possible to obtain rapid, controlled enhancement of immune response. The administration of .beta.AED and .beta.AET avoids the symptoms associated with androgen therapy that occur when DHEA is used in treatment. Furthermore, as shown by the information below in Table 1, the .beta.AED is unexpectedly superior for purposes of protecting against viral assault since the protection offered differs both quantitatively a and qualitatively from protection effected by DHEA.

The acute virus infection used as a model in the examples was chosen because of its widespread effects. The Coxsackievirus B4 is lethal to mice. In man, Coxsackie viruses cause such varied pathologies as upper respiratory infection, pharyngitis, hemorrhagic conjunctivitis, meningitis, exanthem, encephalitis, hepatitis, infantile diarrhea, paralysis, pericarditis, and myocarditis. It is now believed that viruses of this group also have a role in the onset of juvenile diabetes.

The use of .beta.AED and .beta.AET and protected analogues as taught herein provides high levels of protection to vertebrates, including humans, against morbidity arising from infections or exposure to immune suppressive influences. In clinical medicine, treatment with .beta.AED and .beta.AET can lower morbidity in patients exposed to pathogenic organisms. These agents can be effectively used prophylactically in patients known to be particularly susceptible to infection. Patients undergoing surgery or chemotherapy or patients suffering from burns, hypoplastic or aplastic anemias, or diabetes are such susceptible patients who would benefit from prophylactic administration of .beta.AED and/or .beta.AET. The compositions of the invention are particularly useful for treating patients suffering from infections caused by viruses that destroy the body's immune response, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other chronic viral attacks such as hepatitis.

Compositions of the invention may be administered by any method that will result in contact of the active agent with tissue of ectodermal origin. Such methods include subcutaneous or intradermal injection or topical application. One means of topical application is the use of skin patches impregnated with the active agent. This means of delivery is advantageous since it is non-invasive and easily administered by relatively unskilled care providers. Compositions of the invention can also be used in veterinary medicine to prevent morbidity that occurs during stress of shipping.

Administration of .beta.AED and .beta.AET can be effective as a means to prevent spread of infectious disease and introduction of infectious organisms into the foods for human consumption. .beta.AED and .beta.AET can be administered by subcutaneous injection, in food or drink, by patches applied to the skin, or by inhalation. A particular health concern is the spread of infection through eggs. Eggs are frequently infected during development in the hen. Compositions containing active agents of the invention may be added to the feed or water to prevent bacterial infection in the eggs.

When patches are used on animals or birds the skin should be exposed directly to the patch. When a patch is used, it may be necessary to shave or pluck the bird or animal to expose the skin.

Other preferred methods of administration include buccal, nasal or endotracheal routes. Sprays may be useful for this purpose. For nasal administration, the active agent may be delivered as a powder that is snorted. Inclusion complexes such as cyclodextrin inclusion complexes are appropriate compositions for administration to the oral-pharyngeal and nasal mucosa.

.beta.AED and .beta.AET may also be given with vaccines to enhance immune response. These agents may be administered either in a composition containing the vaccine or may be given in a composition separate from the vaccine.

The compounds of the invention may also be administered to the intestinal mucosa by oral or rectal routes. Suppositories, solutions for use as retention enemas, and creams or jellies are appropriate carriers for use in rectal administration.

Compounds of the invention may be applied to the vaginal mucosa using creams, jellies, suppositories, or douching solutions.

In order to enhance immune response at the site of exposure to infectious organisms, the compounds may be added to prophylactic vaginal preparations or may be used as lubricants on condoms.

Administration of compositions of the invention intrathecally has proven to be highly effective as a means of protecting against encephalitis and meningitis. The compositions of the invention may be administered intrathecally either at the spinal level or into the cisterna magna.

Active agents of the invention may be administered via ocular route using compositions in the form of drops, creams, or gel solutions or suspensions adapted for ocular application.

.beta.AED and .beta.AET inhibit the adherence properties of body cells. For purposes of effecting the anti-adherence properties the active agents of the invention may be delivered directly to the epithelial tissue during surgery. An example of such use would involve the application of compositions containing the active agents of the invention to the omentu in conditions such as infection, endometritis and malignancies of the bowel and ovary wherein adherence of foreign cells or particles to normal cells of the peritoneal lining is a problem. Compositions of the invention could, for example, be administered as mists or sprays.

It has now been shown in vivo that DHEA is converted to the .beta.AED and .beta.AET. The .beta.AED and .beta.AET then act as regulators of the immune response. In the skin, the conversion of DHEA to AED and subsequently to AET appears to be one of the metabolic pathways of DHEA. The human skin has the enzymatic machinery to form 7.beta.-OH DHEA and to cause 7.beta.-hydroxylation of AED to yield .beta.AET, while the human adrenal cortex and liver can form only 7.alpha.-hydroxylation of DHEA, but not 7.beta.-hydroxylation. The following table indicates the metabolic pathways of DHEA.

______________________________________Trivial or common name systematic name______________________________________(a) Dehydroepiandrosterone 3.beta.-Hydroxy-5-androsten-17-One (DHEA)(b) Dehydroepiandrosterone 5-androsten-17-one-3-sulfate (DHEAS) sulfate(c) 7 .beta.-OH Dehydroepiandro- -- sterone(d) Androstenediol (AED) 5-androstene3.beta.,17.beta.,diol(e) Androstenetriol (AET) 5-androstene- 3.beta.,7.beta.,17.beta.,triol(f) -- 7 keto-5- androstene- 3.beta.,17.beta.,diol(g) -- 5-androstene-3.beta.,7.alpha.,17.beta.,triol(h) -- 5-androstene-3.beta.,17.beta.,diol-3 sulfate(i) Testosterone 17.beta.- Hydroxy-4-androstene-3one(j) Androstenedione 4-androstene-3, 17 dione(k) Dihydrotestoserone 17.beta.- Hydroxy-5.beta. androstane- 3-one(l) Androsterone 3.beta.-Hydroxy-5.beta. androstan-17-one______________________________________

DHEA (a) is known to have delayed immune enhancing activity. However, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate, "(b)", has been found to have no enhancing effect on the immune system. Both 5 androstene-3.beta., 11.beta., 17.beta.,-triol and 5 androstene-3.beta., 16.beta., 17.beta.,-triol have immunosuppressive effects. Testosterone, "(i)", is known to have an effect on the host immune response, but this effect does not result in protection from lethal infections. The qualitative and quantitative effects of testosterone and the other sex hormones on the immune response are both of a different nature and scope.

EXAMPLE 1

Use of androstenediol (5 androstene-3.beta., 17.beta., diol, .beta.AED) results in marked and significant resistance against viral and bacterial infection. Dose curve experiments were conducted in the following manner: .beta.AED and DHEA were administered as a single depo dose of 8.3 mgs AED or 25 mgs. DHEA to SWRJ and C57BL6J inbred mice. The mice were then challenged with varying amounts of Coxsackievirus B4 (CB4) to determine protective value of the active agents. .beta.AED provided 50% protective dose against coxsackievirus B4, which was as much as 100 times greater than protection provided by DHEA. In addition to the difference in ED50, the degree of protection against virus mortality achieved with androstenediol was also greater than the one obtained with DHEA injection. The increased protection effected by .beta.AED against virus induced mortality was statistically significantly different that the protection obtained by DHEA (P<0.05). See FIG. 2.

TABLE 1______________________________________DHEA AND AED IN SWR/J MICE MORTALITYPER GROUP*______________________________________CB4 10.sup.5 VIRUS ALONE 1/6 DHEA 0/6 AED 0/6CB4 10.sup.6 VIRUS ALONE 3/6 DHEA 0/6 AED 0/6CB4 10.sup.7 VIRUS ALONE 5/6 DHEA 1/6 AED 0/5CB4 10.sup.8 VIRUS ALONE 4/6 DHEA 1/6 AED 0/6______________________________________ *No deaths occurred in control groups. AED versus control pvalue = 0.0001. DHEA versus control pvalue = 0.0017. DHEA versus AED pvalue = 0.0588.

As seen from these results, .beta.AED is markedly more efficient than the precursor DHEA in preventing mortality since an effective dose of .beta.AED which is 1/3 or less the dose necessary to obtain an effect with DHEA is effective in achieving protection from mortality. A similar protection from virus mediated mortality was also observed in the inbred C57BL/6J(b) strain. The two inbred mouse strains, the SWR/J and the C57BL/6J, differ in their major histocompatibility haplotypes, which are q and b respectively. These results show that up-regulation of the immune response achieved with .beta.AED in strains of different histocompatibility may be independent of the major histocompatibility genes on chromosome 17.

Recent reports show that the skin may have unique immune functions. J. W. Streilein and R. E. Tigelar, Photoimmunology, Parrish et al. eds. (Plenum Publishing, New York, 1983) pp. 95-130. Indeed the skin is known to contain a population of cutaneous immune cells, which include the epidermal Langerhans cells and keratinocytes that produce an epidermal thymocyte-activating factor, similar to IL-1, in the murine system's Thy-1+ dendritic epidermal cell.

EXAMPLE 2

Eight mg .beta.AED was administered subcutaneously to outbred ICR mice who were then challenged with a lethal dose of Streptococcus faecalis strain X1515.OG1RF. Animals given .beta.AED showed marked resistance to morbidity as evident from reduction in mortality from 57% in animals challenged with bacteria only, to 0% mortality in animals infected and treated with a single subcutaneous (SC) dose of .beta.AED. Moreover, .beta.AED above a certain threshold dose mediates a considerable proliferation of lymphocyte cells in the spleen and thymus, but only in infected animals. Administration of 8 mg/animal .beta.AED without exposure to the virus did not cause proliferation. Histopathological examination of the organs of inbred SWR/J mice infected with virus only and animals treated with .beta.AED only, or .beta.AED treated and virus infected revealed that .beta.AED is effective in protecting from virus-induced myocardiopathy, and pancreopathy. Data presented in Table 2 below, shows that .beta.AED protects the host ICR inbred strain (Inst. of Cancer Research strain now supplied by Holland Sprague Dowley Company) from S. faecalis, but at a dose which is 1/3 the dose of DHEA required for the same effect.

TABLE 2______________________________________ DOSE % MOR-BACTERIUM AGENT mg/ANIMAL 24 hr. TALITY______________________________________S. faecalis none 0 4/7 8S. faecalis DHEA 25 0/7 0S. faecalis AED 8.3 0/7 0______________________________________

Protection was accomplished in an extremely acute infection where deaths occurred within 24 hours (4/7 deaths in nontreated groups versus 0/7 in the treated). Mice were challenged with a lethal dose of plasmids containing bacterium S. faecalis isolate X1515.OG1RF.

EXAMPLE 3

Wells containing monolayered urinary bladder tumor cells were covered with a 50 .mu.molar solution of either .beta.AED or DHEA overnight before being used in the assay. The results are shown in Table 3 below.

TABLE 3______________________________________X1515.OG1RFWELL DOSE NO. ADHERED % ADHERED______________________________________Media 1.78 .times. 10.sup.6 1.77 .times. 10.sup.6 99.4DMSO 1.78 .times. 10.sup.6 1.98 .times. 10.sup.6 111.2DHEA 1.78 .times. 10.sup.6 1.01 .times. 10.sup.6 56.7AED 1.78 .times. 10.sup.6 1.05 .times. 10.sup.6 59.0______________________________________

As can be seen from Table 3, both DHEA and .beta.AED inhibit the adherence of the bacteria to human urinary bladder tumor cells. It is believed that .beta.AED and AET have an effect on either membrane fluidity, or on a component which influences adhesion and/or penetration into the cell. Urinary Bladder Tumor cells (EJ6) were analyzed by flow cytometry using the fluorescent probe 1-4, trimethylammonio-phenyl-6 1,3,5 hexatriene (TMA-DPH) as a membrane probe to determine the effects of AED on membrane fluidity.

Result

A. Samples 1 and 2 represent CONTROL cells grown in standard tissue culture media. B. Samples 3 and 4 represent cells grown in the above control media with 50 .mu.M AED added. ______________________________________Sample A 1. 0.121256Sample A 2. 0.120548CONTROL AVERAGE 0.120902AED 50 .mu.M 3. 0.135151AED 50 .mu.M 4. 0.142453TEST AVERAGE 0.138802______________________________________

The difference of 0.017899 between the control and .beta.AED treated cells is significant and demonstrates that .beta.AED caused a significant change in cell membrane adhesion. It may be that an increase in cell membrane rigidity (decrease fluidity) influences adherence.

EXAMPLE 4

Cell culture media was inoculated with 4.times.10.sup.7 Hela cells. DHEA was added to a concentration 50 .mu.M and .beta.AED was added to a concentration of 50 .mu.M. The cell culture exposed to DHEA showed a two-fold decrease in cell number. The cell culture exposed to the .beta.AED, the control, and the culture exposed to the carrier alone showed a two fold increase in the number of viable cells. These observations indicate .beta.AED lacks deleterious effects of DHEA during the initial phase of cell response. Neither DHEA nor .beta.AED had an effect on the number of virus infectious particles in vitro. (See FIG. 3.)

EXAMPLE 5

Mice were injected with 8 mg .beta.AED or 25mg DHEA subcutaneously. The mice were then infected with Coxsackievirus B4, 10.sup.5 particles. The mice were sacrificed after 7 days. The spleen lymphocytes were removed and stimulated with Concavalin A, 5 .mu.g/ml in vitro. Stimulation was measured by .sup.3 H-thymidine incorporation method. The results are shown at FIG. 4. The .beta.AED had a profound effect on the proliferation of spleen lymphocytes with as much as 6.6 fold greater proliferation evidenced. The data also indicates that, during the initial phase following administration of the steroid DHEA results in some suppression of the immune system.

The results described above indicate clearly the advantage of using .beta.AED or .beta.AET rather than DHEA to increase immune response to infections, since the initial immune suppression that precedes the immune up-regulation that is seen in treatment with DHEA is avoided. Hence, therapy with .beta.AED and .beta.AET, rather than DHEA is preferred to improve immune response to infectious organisms.

The only change in structure between DHEA and AED is a reduction of the keto group at the 17 position to a .beta. hydroxyl group. The AET which has the hydrogen at the 7 position replaced with a .beta. hydroxyl group is produced by a metabolic pathway in the skin. In other words, .beta.AET is down-stream product of metabolic pathway from DHEA in the skin. The .beta.AET is seen to be the most effective compound for effecting immune up-regulation and protection from untoward effects of stress, chemotherapy, and irradiation.

An important aspect of the invention is the preparation of sterio-specific .beta.AET for use as a medicinal. The synthesis was accomplished using the 7-oxo-3.beta., 17.beta. acetoxyandrost-5-ene as a starting material.

Synthesis of 3.beta., 7.beta., 17.beta.-Trihydroxyandrost-5-ene(I) and 3.beta.,7.beta., 17.beta.-Trihydroxyandrost-5-ene(II)

Chromic oxide oxidation of 3.beta.17.beta.-diacetoxyandrost-5-ene in gacial acetic acid gave 3.beta., 17.beta.-diacetoxyandrost-5en-7-one, (III), the intermediate to (I) or (II).

Aluminum isopropoxide reduction of (III) in isopropanol gave (I). lithium tri (sec-butyl) borohydride reduction of (III) in tetrahydrofuran yielded (II).

Preparation of 3.beta.17.beta.-diacetoxyandrost-5-en-7-one(III)

37.4 g (0.1 mol) 3.beta.17.beta.-diacetoxyandrost-5-ene (Steraloids A7850) in 400 ml glacial acetic acid was reacted with 30.06 g (0.3 mol) chromium(VI) oxide (Aldrich 23,265-3) dissolved in 20 ml H20 and 20 ml glacial acetic acid. The CrO.sub.3 solution was added drop-wise to the 3.beta., 17.beta.-diacetoxyandrost-5-ene solution while maintaining the temperature at 55.degree. C. for 4 hours. In order to decompose any unreacted CrO.sub.3, methanol was added to the reaction mixture followed by aqueous salt solution and ether. Evaporation of the ether yielded 7.8 g (20% yield) of crude III, (details are given in lab book #1, pp. 10-16). Crystallization from 95% EtOH yielded (III) m.p. 214.degree.-215.degree. C., DSC peak 191.degree.-224.degree. C., max at 220.degree. C. Lit.,.sup.1 m.p. 218.degree.-219.degree. C., Lit.,.sup.2 m.p. 224.degree.-225.degree. C. (from methanol).

Normal phase tlc: EtOAC-cyclohexane-EtOh (45:45:10), Rf=0.86. IR bands (cm .sup.- 1: 1737,1666 (Lit.,.sup.2 1728,1668). .sup.1 H nmr (CDC13),(d), ppm: 0.81 (s,3H), 1.25 (s,3H), 2.02 (s,6H), 2.25 (m,H at C-4), 2.5 (m,H at C-8), 4.6 (t,H at C-17), 4.7 (m,H at C-3), 5.72 (s,1H); (Lit.,.sup.2 0.80 (s,3H), 1.20 (s,3H), 2.03 (s,6H), 4.62 (m,1H), 5.71 (g,1H).) Reverse phase 1 c/ms (fast atom bombardment detection)detected m/z 389(M+HJ' ion in the major 1 c peak, (Lit., 2 m/z 388 (M). Tentative C-13 nmr, (d), ppm assignments CDC13) are:

______________________________________Carbon1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8ppm38.35 35.74 72.04 43.03 164.22 126.44 201.18 65.82______________________________________Carbon9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16ppm49.69 37.76 27.26 35.95 44.72 44.95 25.83 27.55______________________________________Carbon17 18 19 20 21 22 23ppm81.90 12.05 20.67 171.14 21.24 170.23 21.17______________________________________

Preparation of 3.beta., 7.beta., 17.beta.-trihydroxyandrost-5-ene(I)

3.beta., 17.beta.-diacetoxyandrost-5-en-7-one was subjected to reduction by aluminum isopropoxide in isopropanol to give 3.beta.,7.beta., 7.beta.-trihydroxyandrost-5-ene.

Preparation of 3.beta., 7.beta., 17.beta.-trihydroxyandrost-5-ene(II)

5.1 ml(5.1 mmol) lithium tri(sec-butyl)borohydride (Aldrich L-Selectride) in tetrahydrofuran was rapidly added to 499 mg(1.28 mmol) of 3.beta.,17.beta.-diacetoxyandrost-5-en-7-one in 15 ml of freshly distilled tetrahydrofuran under nitrogen while stirring for 1.5 hours at ice-bath temperature. 0.9 g KOH in 15 ml methanol was added, reaction mixture refluxed for 0.5 hours, and then added 37.5 ml of 10% NaCl solution. After cooling in freezer(-20.degree.), crystals formed which were filtered to yield 123.6 mg (19%) (11), m.p. 239-45.degree. C. Crystallization from methanol yielded (II), m.p. 249.5-253.degree. C.

.sup.1 H nmr (CD(OD).sub.3), (d),ppm: 0.75(s,3H),1.01(s,3H),3.1(m,1H), 3.6(t,1H),3.7(d,1H),5.50(d,1H).

Tentative C-13 nmr, (d),ppm assignments (CD(OD)3) are:

______________________________________Carbon1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9ppm37.49 32.12 72.01 42.91 146.75 124.88 65.46 39.09 43.58______________________________________Carbon10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19ppm38.55 21.49 30.65 93.65 45.35 38.13 42.57 82.30 11.57 19.53______________________________________

Discussion

Stereochemistry was assigned to 3.beta.7.beta.,17.beta.-trihydroxyandrost-5-ene(I) and 3.beta.7.alpha.17.beta.-trihydroxyandrost-5-ene(II) by comparison with cholest-5-ene-3.beta.7.beta.-diol and cholest-5-ene-3.beta.7.alpha.-diol proton nmr(Lit.3). L-Selectride reduction of (III) to produce (II) was carried out using the same reaction conditions given by Morisaki for the preparation of 7.alpha.-hydroxycholesterol.sup.4. Carbon-13 resonances for stereoisomers (I) and (II) are shown.

______________________________________ ISOMER ISOMERCARBON (II) (MULTIPLICITIES (ppm)) (I)______________________________________1 37.19 T 37.772 32.12 T 32.303 72.01 D 72.124 42.91 T 41.245 146.75 * 144.106 121.88 D 127.437 65.46 D 74.008 39.09 D 38.299 43.58 D 50.0810 38.55 * 37.7311 21.49 T 21.9012 30.65 T 30.8613 43.65 * 44.2714 45.35 D 52.3115 38.31 T 26.6016 42.57 T 42.5717 82.30 D 82.3018 11.57 Q 11.5719 19.53 Q 19.53______________________________________ Q = quartet, T = triplet, D = doublet and * = quaternary C ##STR2## ##STR3##

REFERENCES

1. Adolf Butenandt et al. Ber. 71B, 1316-22(1938). 2. Anthony J. Pearson et al., J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. I, 267-273(1985). 3. Leland L. Smith et al., J.Org.Chem., Vol. 38, No. 1, 119-123 (1973). 4. Masuo Morisaki et al., Chem. Pharm. Bull. 35(5)1847-1852, (1987)

The compositions of the invention containing .beta.AED and .beta.AET, have been shown to be particularly useful in treatment of undesirable effects of stress, chemotherapy, and exposure to irradiation. One of the more depressing results of stress, chemotherapy or exposure to excessive irradiation is alopecia The compounds of the invention are effective for treating the alopecia resulting from effects of chemotherapy and irradiation. The compositions of both .beta.AED and .beta.AET are useful in overcoming other untoward effects of immune suppression, including those arising from radiation and chemotherapy.

EXAMPLE 6

SWR/J inbred mice were injected with single depo doses of 0.5, 2.0, 4.0 and 8.0 mg/animal of .beta.AED, then challenged with 10.sup.7 PFU Coxsackievirus B4. The results are shown at FIG. 6. Based on these results, the theoretical dose (extrapolated) of .beta.AED necessary to achieve 50% protection from infection with 10.sup.7 PFU of CB4 is 0.25 mg/animal.

The example demonstrates that .beta.AED is 50 to 100 times more potent than DHEA for protection from Coxsackievirus B4.

EXAMPLE 7

In an attempt to evaluate effect of .beta.AED on pathologies of the heart and pancreas in infected mammals, three groups of inbred SWR/J mice were compared. The groups studied included animals infected with virus only, animals treated with .beta.AED only, and animals infected with virus and protected with .beta.AED. The comparison revealed the following:

______________________________________ Heart Pancreas______________________________________AED unremarkable unremarkableVIRUS focal areas of multiple severe necrosis necrosis with substantial (Pancreopathy) myocardial calcification. (Myocardiopathy)AED PLUS no evidence of no evidence ofvirus induced myocardiopathy virus induced pancreopathy______________________________________

These results demonstrate that .beta.AED given as a single depo dose at 8.0 mg/mouse protected the heart tissue from virus induced myocardiopathy, and also protected the pancreas from virus induced necrosis of this organ. These results show that .beta.AED can be used effectively in the protection from virus-induced cardiovascular and pancreatic disease, in particular myocardiopathies and pancreopathies. Previously there were no effective drugs to protect these organs from virus induced damage.

The use of .beta.AED or .beta.AET as active agents to provide regulation of the immune system makes it possible to effectively regulate the host immune response against viral, bacterial and other infections. In the case of virus-induced heart or pancreatic infection where no other antiviral chemotherapeutic modality exists these agents have value as prophylactic protective agents. The protective value of .beta.AED and .beta.AET is particularly important to patients undergoing surgical procedures or suffering injuries where resistant strains of organisms such as pseudomonas present a serious threat. Examples of such patients are those undergoing bowel surgery or suffering from gunshot wounds of the abdomen. Patients with history of conditions such as rheumatic fever would also benefit from prophylactic use of .beta.AED and .beta.AET. The mode of administration in a particular case will depend on the infectious agent against which protection is sought and the target tissue of the organism While the administration subcutaneously as a depo is effective against systemic infections as shown by the data presented above, when the compositions are given to assist the body in meeting an infection in a particular tissue, it may be advantageous to administer the active agents to the tissues most affected

The carrier used in a given instance will depend on the mode of administration. Both AED and AET are lipophilic compounds. They are more soluble than DHEA in water. Solvents for lipophilic steroids are known in the art and would be used as carriers for these compounds. Examples of such carriers are glycols such as polypropylene glycol, polyethylene glycol. and cyclodextrins, especially the intrinsically amorphous cyclodextrins. Other vehicles that should be considered include fatty acid esters of polyoxyethylene sorbatan (Tweens) or sorbitan (Spans) to prepare oil-in-water emulsions.

When .beta.AED or .beta.AET or their analogues are administered orally, the active agents may be utilized more efficiently if the active agents are protected from destruction and absorption in the upper gastro-intestinal tract. The active agents are most effective when the period of exposure to the mucosa of the intestinal tract is increased. Hence use of capsules containing the active agents in formulations that effect slow release in the intestine are appropriate for treatment of intestinal disorders such as Crohn's disease and colitis. Use of retention enemas for treatment of inflammation of the large bowel is also appropriate.

When the active agent is administered to the mucosa of the oral cavity, it may be administered as a buccal tablet or spray for use in the oral-pharyngeal cavity and the nasal cavities.

The compositions could also be administered to the bronchial tree via inhalation. This means of administration would be particularly useful in treating patients with lung infections or in treating other lung conditions such as black lung disease or emphysema that often are complicated by opportunistic infections. The compositions could be given by aerosol into the trachea or administered in mist along with other agents used in respiration therapy.

The administration of the .beta.AED and .beta.AET to the skin can be accomplished using patches wherein a support is impregnated with the active agent or using implants that provide slow release of the active agents.

Compositions of the invention can be administered as a prophylactic during radiation therapy or chemotherapy or after exposure to irradiation whether the exposure occurs as a result of environmental accident or therapy. Other instances when use of these immune up-regulators would be appropriate is in treatment of burns, hypoplastic and aplastic anemias, diabetes, and in the elderly during epidemics. Their use is also beneficial in preventing or mitigating effects of exposure to dangerous infectious organisms, as was demonstrated by the data related to cardiopathies and pancreopathies. Such use is particularly indicated in populations exposed to organisms that target the immune system, such as HIV infections. As indicated previously, patients scheduled to undergo bowel surgery could receive a dose of .beta.AED or .beta.AET prophylactically. Use of the compositions as taught herein before invasive dental procedures or oral surgery should be considered.

As indicated in the tables and previous discussion, the compositions of the invention can be used to prevent adhesion of bacteria to the tissues. The prevention of cell to cell adhesion resulting from administration of the compositions also has applications for prevention of thrombosis. Compositions of the invention can be administered as a slow drip into blood vessels when prevention of formation of a thrombus is necessary. An example of such use would be a drip into an artery following thrombolectomy.

The administration of the .beta.AED or .beta.AET can be employed as a means of preventing formation of infectious foci.

.beta.AED and .beta.AET are both effective in overcoming effects of ultraviolet depravation. Hence, administration of the compositions to overcome the effects of depression related to light deprivation (usually called seasonal adaptive disorder) is appropriate.

In certain instances the compositions taught herein can also be used as immune modulators in the production of blocking antibodies to counteract hypersensitivity reactions.

.beta.AED and .beta.AET may be used as adjuncts in vaccination to increase response to an immunogen. Such use is particularly appropriate in instances where inhibition of immune response can be a complicating factor as is the case in patients suffering from, for example, malignancies, AIDS, or environmental factors such as exposure to pesticides. It is, of course, understood that use as adjunct to vaccination would be appropriate in vertebrates other than man, including vaccination of pets, dairy animals, meat-producing animals, fish, and chickens.

Chickens are particularly prone to develop infectious diseases when living in confined conditions. Coccidiosis, Salmonella infections, viral infections, including those giving rise to malignancies such as leukemia and sarcoma (caused by a retrovirus) are particularly common among chickens grown under modern commercial conditions. The active agents of the invention may be given by any means that results in contact of the agent with tissue of ecotdermal origin.

The effect of Coxsackievirus on humans has been noted previously. The value of avoiding such effects, especially in children, is clear. Effects of other viruses such as chickenpoxherpes zoster is considered an important cause of debilitating illness in the elderly. Furthermore, chickenpox in susceptible adults often causes severe illness In children, chicken pox can cause death when the child is subjected to immuno suppressive therapy or is genetically immune deficient. .beta.AED and .beta.AET a useful for prophylatic treatment of susceptible persons who have been exposed to infection. Finally, the protection of the fetus and newborn from HSV infection is a very important application of the invention. .beta.AED and .beta.AET can be administered during the third trimester to HSV-infected women as a means of protecting the newborn.

In vitro, these compounds can be used in commercial setting to induce lymphocyte proliferation. The use of .beta.AED and .beta.AET would increase yield of products of such proliferation in tissue culture. In the clinical setting, .beta.AED and .beta.AET can be given to effectively enhance patients' ability to combat infections. Patient lymphocytes may be withdrawn, reproduced in vitro in media containing .beta.AED or .beta.AET to increase proliferation of lymphocytes, and the lymphocytes could then be reintroduced into the patient. In cases such as malignancy or other cellular disease, the malfunctioning cells can be inactivated by known means before proliferation in growth media.

The compositions of the invention may also be used prophylactically to protect animals from the consequences of infection by pathogenic organisms. It is known that under the stress of shipment to market animals often become susceptible to infections that are not ordinarily serious, but that can cause the animals to loss much weight en route to the packing house. Such loss may be avoided by administration .beta.AED and .beta.AET and analogues disclosed herein. The active agents can be given by patch, injection, or in feed. Because the active agents are most effective when the period of exposure to the tissue of ectodermal origin is extended, when the active agents are administered through the GI tract, compositions should be modified to extend the period of exposure of the active agent to the intestinal mucosa and to protect the agents from distruction in the upper GI tract. Hence, use of capsules that effect slow release in the intestine is appropriate. The capsules may be placed in baits for administration to animals. To treat infections of the large bowel, the active agents may be given by retention enema.

.beta.AED and .beta.AET may be administered to the mucosa of oral, pharyngeal, and nasal cavity by tablet, a lozenge, by administration as a spray for use in the oral-pharyngeal cavity, or as a nasal spray.

Administration to the skin may be accomplished using patches wherein a support to be applied to the skin is impregnated with the active agent. If the host is a mammal or bird, it may be necessary to shave or pluck the region to which the patch is applied.

A preferred method of administration is by subcutaneous injection as a depo. The method is particularly appropriate for administration of the active agents to mammals, since subcutaneous injection is easily performed and the effect is relatively long lasting.

.beta.AED and .beta.AET are already present in the body as natural components. They do not pose a serious toxic problem at levels known to be safe; they appear to be are chemically quite stable.

The dosages used will depend on the size and condition of the host. Test data indicated in this application was obtained in small animals In larger adult mammals daily dosage of 0.2 to 30 mgm/da. of AED a preferred dosage. For AET the preferred dosage is usually in the range of 0.001 to 20 mgm/da, with 0.001 to 1 mgm/da. being the more preferred dosage. However, the dosage will vary depending on the route of administration. Subcutaneous, inhalation and intrathecal administration are to be methods that would require lower dosages of the active agents.

It is, of course, understood that analogues of .beta.AED and .beta.AET having protective groups can be administered to the host as a means of delivering .beta.AED or .beta.AET to target tissues Acylation is a preferred method of protecting the compounds. Acylated compounds wherein R.sub.1 is COR.sub.2 are also appropriate compounds for use as starting material from which to make .beta.AED and .beta.AET.

The active agents, .beta.AED and .beta.AET, can be given in conjunction with other active agents which may be given simultaneously or may be incorporated in compositions containing .beta.AED or .beta.AET. .beta.AED and .beta.AET can be given with anti-infective agents such as antibiotics, antiviral agents, antifungals, antiparasitic agent to potentiate the activity of these drugs by up-regulating protective immune response. Antiviral agents include, for example, Dideoxyinosine, AZT, acyclovir, etc. Other active agents that may be combined with the AED and AET include antiallergic medications such as epinephrine.

Finally, medicinal compositions containing .beta.AED and .beta.AET are particularly valuable for use in combating viral infections in patients who have suffered from infections exacerbated by immunosuppressive therapy. One of the major complications in patients with tissue transplants is the opportunistic infection with viruses that ordinarily do not cause serious disease symptoms. Use of the compositions of the invention, which result in rapid protective regulation of the immune response, allows the medical team to place the patient on "see-saw" therapy to avoid transplant rejection while regulating the immune response to avoid overwhelming infection.

Claims

1. A method of enhancing protective immune response and treating complications accompanying immune suppression in a mammal by administration of an immune response enhancing effective amount of a composition containing at least one compound of the structure: ##STR4## wherein R.sub.1 may be H, alkenyl of 2-8 carbons, alkyl of 1-8 carbons, benzyl, phenyl or COR.sub.2, wherein R.sub.2 is H, alkyl of 1-8 carbons, alkenyl of 2-8 carbons, benzyl, or phenyl wherein the phenyl moiety may have up to three substituents selected from the group consisting of hydroxy, carboxy of 1-4 carbons, halo, alkoxy of 1-4 carbons, alkyl of 1-4 carbons, and alkenyl of 2-4 carbons.

2. A method of claim 2 wherein the composition is administered using a patch or implant.

3. A method of claim 2 wherein the composition is administered by inhalation.

4. A method of claim 3 wherein the composition is administered by aerosol spray.

5. A method of claim 3 wherein the composition is inhaled in powder form.

6. A method of claim 2 wherein the composition administered is a cyclodextrin inclusion complex.

7. A method of claim 6 wherein the composition is administered as a buccal tablet.

8. A method of claim 2 wherein the active agent is beta-androstenediol or beta-androstenetriol.

9. A method of claim 8 wherein the composition is administered subcutaneously, intradermally, or by topical application.

10. A method of claim 8 wherein the composition is administered using a patch or implant.

11. A method of claim 8 wherein the composition is administered by inhalation.

12. A method of claim 11 wherein the composition is administered by aerosol spray.

13. A method of claim 11 wherein the composition is inhaled in powder form.

14. A method of claim 8 wherein the composition administered is a cyclodextrin inclusion complex.

15. A method of claim 14 wherein the composition is administered as a buccal tablet.

16. A method of claim 8 wherein the composition is administered intrathecally.

17. A method of claim 16 wherein the composition is administered into the cisterna magna.

18. A method of claim 8 wherein the composition is administered intranasally.

19. A method of claim 8 wherein the composition is administered into the vaginal wall.

20. A method of claim 8 wherein the composition is administered as a lubricant for condoms.

21. A method of claim 8 wherein the composition is administered by ocular route as drops, cream or gel.

22. A method of claim 2 wherein the composition is administered rectally.

23. A method of claim 8 wherein the composition is administered rectally.

24. A method of claim 8 wherein the amount administered is 0.2-30 mg. beta-adrostenediol or 0.001 to 20 mg beta-adrostenetriol.