Enhancing drag reduction properties of slick water systems

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8841240
  • Patent Number
    8,841,240
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 21, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 23, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
Novel slick water fracturing fluid compositions are disclosed, where the compositions including with slick water fracturing compositions including a partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymer system within invert emulsion and an effective amount of a friction reducer booster system, where the effective amount is sufficient to reduce a drag friction of the composition by an additional amount of at least 5% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation in high salinity and low temperature environments.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


Embodiments of the present invention relate to slick water fracturing compositions including a partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymer system within an inverted emulsion and an effective amount of a friction reducer booster system, where the effective amount is sufficient to reduce a drag friction of the composition by an amount greater than about 50% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation in high salinity and low temperature environments.


Embodiments of the present invention provide slick water fracturing compositions including water, a partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymer and an effective amount of a friction reducer booster system including a quaternary salt or a plurality of quaternary salts, where the effective amount is sufficient to reduce a drag friction of the composition by an additional 12% or more in high salinity and low temperature environments compared to the tests in the absence of the friction reducer booster system.


2. Description of the Related Art


Historically, improving drag reduction in slick water systems has been addressed by decreasing the concentration of total dissolved solids by cutting the produced brine with fresh water in ratios that can go up to 10:1 (fresh water to produced water).


Another way to address the problem has been manufacturing a more salt resistance friction reducers, where the composition includes terpolymers of acrylamide, hydrolyzed acrylamide and partially sulfonated acrylamide.


A more recent approach includes changing the emulsion package of the inverted emulsion or containing the partially hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide.


While these approaches have had some success, there is still a need in the art for slick water systems having improved drag reduction properties.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention provide slick water fracturing compositions including a partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymer system within invert emulsion and an effective amount of a friction reducer booster system, where the effective amount is sufficient to reduce a drag friction of the composition by an additional amount of about 5% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation in high salinity and low temperature environments. In certain embodiments, the drag friction is reduced by an additional amount of about 5% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation in high salinity and low temperature environments. In other embodiments, the drag friction is reduced by an additional amount of about 10% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation in high salinity and low temperature environments. In other embodiments, the drag friction is reduced by an additional amount of about 12% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation in high salinity and low temperature environments.


Embodiments of the present invention provide slick water fracturing compositions including, water, a partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymer and an effective amount of a friction reducer booster system of quaternary salt or a plurality of quaternary salts, where the effective amount is sufficient to reduce a drag friction of the composition by an additional 5%, 10% or 12% or more in the first 30 seconds of evaluation in high salinity and low temperature environments compared to the tests in the absence of the friction reducer booster system.


Embodiments of the present invention provide methods for fracturing a formation including pumping a fracturing fluid into a formation at a pressure sufficient to fracture the formation, water as base fluid, 0.25-1.5 gal/1000 gal of friction reducer based in a inverted emulsion with 25 wt. % and about 35 wt. % of partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymers and an effective friction reducer booster, where the effective amount is sufficient to reduce a drag friction of the composition by an additional about 5% or more in the first 30 seconds of evaluation compared to the fluid without the friction reducer booster. In other embodiments, the additional drag reduction is about 10% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation. In other embodiments, the additional drag reduction is about 12% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation.


Embodiments of the present invention provide methods for fracturing a formation including pumping a fracturing fluid into a formation at a pressure sufficient to fracture the formation, where the fluid including between about 0.25 and about 1.5 gal/1000 gal of invert emulsion with about 25 to about 35 wt. % of partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymers and an effective amount of friction reducer booster, where the effective amount is sufficient to reduce a drag friction of the composition up to additional 5% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation compared to the fluid without the booster. In other embodiments, the additional drag reduction is about 10% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation. In other embodiments, the additional drag reduction is about 12% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation.


Embodiments of the present invention provide a slick water fracturing composition comprising from about 0.01 to about 2.5 gpt of an inverted emulsion including between about 25 wt. % and about 35 wt. % of a partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymer system and an effective amount of a friction reducing booster system, where the effective amount is sufficient to reduce a drag friction of the composition by an additional 5% or more in the first 30 seconds of evaluation in high salinity aqueous solutions and/or temperature environments compared to the tests in the absence of the friction reducer booster system. In other embodiments, the additional drag reduction is about 10% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation. In other embodiments, the additional drag reduction is about 12% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The invention can be better understood with reference to the following detailed description together with the appended illustrative drawings in which like elements are numbered the same:



FIG. 1 depicts a plot of friction reduction of an embodiment of a first slick water fracturing fluid made with fresh water using 0.5 gpt of friction reducers WFR-55LA and 0.5 gpt of a first friction reducer booster system.



FIG. 2 depicts a plot of friction reduction of an embodiment of a second slick water fracturing fluid made with Synthetic Water simulating 1:1 ratio (fresh water:Marcellus flow back sample) with total dissolved solids (TDS) of 109,282 mg/L of this invention using 0.5 gpt of friction reducer WFR-62LA and 0.5 gpt of a first friction reducer booster system.



FIG. 3 depicts a plot of friction reduction of the first and second slick water fracturing fluids of this invention with 0.5 gpt of friction reducer WFR-55LA and 0.5 gpt of friction reducer WFR-62LA and using 0.075 gpt of a second friction reducer booster system.



FIG. 4 depicts a plot of friction reduction of the slick water fracturing fluid using 0.5 gpt of WFR-62LA made with Synthetic Water simulating 1:1 ratio (fresh water:Marcellus flow back sample) with total dissolved solids (TDS) of 109,282 mg/L and using three different friction reducer booster systems of this invention at different concentrations.



FIG. 5 depicts a plot of friction reduction of the first slick water fracturing fluid at low temperature using 0.5 gpt of friction reducer WFR-55LA and 0.15 gpt friction reducer booster system FR4 of this invention as several different temperatures.





DEFINITIONS OF THE INVENTION

The term “gpt” means gallons per thousand gallons.


The term “gptg” means gallons per thousand gallons.


The term “pptg” means pounds per thousand gallons.


The term “wt. %” means weight percent.


The term “w/w” means weight per weight.


The term “amphoteric” refers to surfactants that have both positive and negative charges. The net charge of the surfactant can be positive, negative, or neutral, depending on the pH of the solution.


The term “anionic” means a compound that possesses a net negative charge.


The term “fracturing” refers to the process and methods of breaking down a geological formation, i.e. the rock formation around a well bore, by pumping fluid at very high pressures, in order to increase production rates from a hydrocarbon reservoir. The fracturing methods of this invention use otherwise conventional techniques known in the art.


The term “proppant” refers to a granular substance suspended in the fracturing fluid during the fracturing operation, which serves to keep the formation from closing back down upon itself once the pressure is released. Proppants envisioned by the present invention include, but are not limited to, conventional proppants familiar to those skilled in the art such as sand, 20-40 mesh sand, resin-coated sand, sintered bauxite, glass beads, and similar materials.


The term “surfactant” refers to a soluble, or partially soluble compound that reduces the surface tension of liquids, or reduces inter-facial tension between two liquids, or a liquid and a solid by congregating and orienting itself at these interfaces.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The inventors have found that drag properties and/or friction properties of slick water fracturing systems, using friction reducers based in inverted emulsions of high molecular weight of partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymers can be reduced to 65% in 30 seconds or less in brines from water flowback, whose high concentration of total dissolved solids is higher than 100,000 mg/L using a friction reduction booster system of this invention. The inventors have found that by adding a friction reduction booster system at low concentrations to slick water fracturing fluids including base water and a partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymer, the friction/drag properties of the fluids can be significantly increased. The friction reduction booster system comprises one quaternary salt or a plurality of quaternary salts. The addition of the friction reduction booster systems of the invention enhances a rate of inversion of the inverted emulsion of the friction reducer and therefore the rate of hydration of the polymer(s). The inventors have found that the friction reducer booster systems of this invention cause high friction reduction of slick water systems without the need to use expensive terpolymers, which contains acrylamido-methyl-propane sulfonate (AMPS) segments. The inventors have also found that by adding the friction reducer booster system of this invention to a slick water fracturing fluid, the friction reducer booster system enhances friction reduction properties of the fluid allowing the use of less friction reducer to achieve desired fracturing properties. The inventors have found that the friction reducer booster systems of this invention are well suited for use in high salinity brines and low temperature environments.


It has been observed and reported that quaternary salt based biocides have a detrimental effect on friction reducers. SPE 119569: Are You Buying Too Much Friction Reducer Because of Your Biocide? Shawn M. Rimassa, Paul R. Howard, and Michael O. Arnold, S P E, Schlumberger.


In the present invention, the inventors have shown that quaternary salts found in that Bio-Clear 242D had synergistic effect with anionic friction reducers such as WFR-62LA “aka” FRA-405 in high salinity environment such as Apt. 110,000 ppm TDS. The inventors tested Bio-Clear™ 242D and two of the three quaternary salts in Bio-Clear™ 242D in high salinity environments. The two quaternary salts tested herein were Alkyl (C12-16) Dimethylbenzylammonium chloride available from Sigma Aldrich and sold under the name SigmaClean™ and 1-Octaminium, N,N-Dimethyl-N-Octyl-Chloride from Lonza sole under the name Bardac™ LF. The inventors also tested several other quaternary salt compositions as friction reducer boosters, all of this showed significant friction reduction when used in combination with anionic friction reducers in slick water using friction reducers based in partially hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide™ (PHPA) delivered within an inverted emulsion.


Suitable Reagents and Devices

Suitable friction reducer booster systems of this invention include, without limitation, (1) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3ArN+X, where R1 and R2 are carbyl group including 1 to 3 carbon atoms, R3 is a carbyl group including about 8 to about 20 carbon atoms, Ar is an aryl group and Xis a counterion, (2) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3R4N+X, where R1 and R2 are carbyl group including 1 to 3 carbon atoms, R3 and R4 are a carbyl group including about 6 to about 10 carbon atoms, and X is a counterion or (3) mixtures and combinations thereof, where X includes chloride (Cl), bromide (Br), hydroxide (OH), or mixtures thereof.


In certain embodiments, the quaternary friction reduction systems of this invention include, without limitation, (1) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3ArN+X, where R1 and R2 are carbyl group including 1 to 2 carbon atoms, R3 is a carbyl group including about 10 to about 18 carbon atoms, Ar is an aryl group and X is a chloride, (2) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3R4N+X, where R1 and R2 are carbyl group including 1 to 2 carbon atoms, R3 and R4 are a carbyl group including about 7 to about 9 carbon atoms, and X is a chloride, or (3) mixtures and combinations thereof.


In certain embodiments, the compound of the general formula R1R2R3ArN+X comprises alkyl (C12-16), dimethylbenzylammonium chloride.


In certain embodiments, the friction reducer booster systems of this invention include, without limitation, (1) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3ArN+X, where R1 and R2 are carbyl group including 1 carbon atom, R3 is a carbyl group including about 12 to about 16 carbon atoms, Ar is an aryl group and X is a chloride, (2) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3R4N+X, where R1 and R2 are carbyl groups including 1 carbon atom, R3 and R4 are a carbyl group including 8 carbon atoms, and X is a chloride, or (3) mixtures and combinations thereof.


In certain embodiments, the compound of the general formula R1R2R3ArN+X comprises alkyl (C12-16), dimethylbenzylammonium chloride.


In certain embodiments the compound of the general formula R1R2R3R4N+X comprises 1-Octaminium, N,N-Dimethyl-N-Octyl-Chloride.


Suitable partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymers for use in this invention include, without limitation, polyacrylamide polymers having a molecular weight between about 1 million and about 50 million and being partially hydrolyzed, where the degree of hydrolysis is between about 1% to about 50%.


In certain embodiments, the partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymers include polyacrylamide polymers having a molecular weight between about 5 million and about 40 million and being partially hydrolyzed, where the degree of hydrolysis is between about 1% to about 50%.


In certain embodiments, the partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymers include, without limitation, polyacrylamide polymers having a molecular weight between about 10 million and about 30 million and being partially hydrolyzed, where the degree of hydrolysis is between about 1% to about 50%.


In certain embodiments, the partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymers include, without limitation, polyacrylamide polymers having a molecular weight between about 20 million and about 30 million and being partially hydrolyzed, where the degree of hydrolysis is between about 1% to about 50%.


Fracturing Fluids

Generally, a slick water fracturing treatment involves pumping a high viscosity fluid into a formation including a proppant, although the proppant may be pumped-in later, as a free viscous fluid, or pad, usually water with some fluid additives to generate high viscosity, into a formation at a rate faster than the fluid can escape into the formation so that the pressure rises and the rock of the formation fractures or breaks, creating artificial fractures and/or enlarging existing fractures. During or after fracturing the formation, the propping agent, generally a solid material such as sand is added to the fluid to form a slurry that is pumped into the newly formed fractures in the formation to prevent them from closing when the pumping pressure is released. The proppant transport ability of a base fluid depends on the type of viscosifying additives added to the water base.


“Waterfrac treatments employ the use of low cost, low viscosity fluids in order to stimulate very low permeability reservoirs. The results have been reported to be successful (measured productivity and economics) and rely on the mechanisms of asperity creation (rock spalling), shear displacement of rock and localized high concentration of proppant to create adequate conductivity. It is the last of the three mechanisms that is mostly responsible for the conductivity obtained in “waterfrac” treatments. The mechanism can be described as analogous to a wedge splitting wood.


There are various methods available for breaking a fracturing fluid or a treating fluid. Typically, fluids break after the passage of time and/or prolonged exposure to high temperatures. However, it is desirable to be able to predict and control the breaking within relatively narrow limits. Mild oxidizing agents are useful as breakers when a fluid is used in a relatively high temperature formation, although formation temperatures of 300° F. (149° C.) or higher will generally break the fluid relatively quickly without the aid of an oxidizing agent.


Examples of inorganic breaking agents for use in this invention include, but are not limited to, persulfates, percarbonates, perborates, peroxides, perphosphates, permanganates, etc. Specific examples of inorganic breaking agents include, but are not limited to, alkaline earth metal persulfates, alkaline earth metal percarbonates, alkaline earth metal perborates, alkaline earth metal peroxides, alkaline earth metal perphosphates, zinc salts of peroxide, perphosphate, perborate, and percarbonate, and so on. Additional suitable breaking agents are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,877,127; 5,649,596; 5,669,447; 5,624,886; 5,106,518; 6,162,766; and 5,807,812. In some embodiments, an inorganic breaking agent is selected from alkaline earth metal or transition metal-based oxidizing agents, such as magnesium peroxides, zinc peroxides, and calcium peroxides.


The liquid carrier can generally be any liquid carrier suitable for use in oil and gas producing wells. A presently preferred liquid carrier is water. The liquid carrier can comprise water, can consist essentially of water, or can consist of water. Water will typically be a major component by weight of the fluid. The water can be potable or non-potable water. The water can be brackish or contain other materials typical of sources of water found in or near oil fields. For example, it is possible to use fresh water, brine, or even water to which any salt, such as an alkali metal or alkali earth metal salt (NaCO.sub.3, NaCl, KCl, etc.) has been added.


EXPERIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Determination of the Friction Reduction of the Slick Water Systems


Prepare 12 liters of the slick water base system (with no added polymer). Pour the 12 liters of the base system into a feed tank of a friction loop system and start to shear the base system at a rate of 9 gal/min and determine the drop of pressure across the friction loop system. Add 0.5 gpt or 1 gpt of the polymer system and note the drop pressure at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 3.0 minutes. Determine at each time the percentage of friction reduction as function of the pressure drop, where the Friction Reduction (%)=[1-(DP/DP0)]*100, where DP0 represents the original pressure drop and DP the pressure drop when the formulation include the breaker system under study.


Example 1

This example illustrates the use of Bio-Clean™ 242D, referred to as FR1, in a slick water inverted fracturing fluid including 0.5 gpt of WFR-55LA including partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymers, available from Clearwater International, LLC, with or without 0.5 gpt FR1.


The two fluids were tested as described above. The results are set forth in FIG. 1, where the second fracturing fluid shows slightly enhanced friction reduction over the time period, except for the last time measurement, where the two fluids are essentially equally effective.


Example 2

This example illustrates the use of Bio-Clear™ 242D, referred to as FR1, in a slick water inverted fracturing fluid including 1.0 gpt of WFR-62LA (partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymer system within invert emulsion), available from Clearwater International, LLC, with or without 0.5 gpt FR1.


1.0 gpt WFR-62LA was added to form a first fracturing fluid. To the same slick water fluid was added 0.5 gpt of FR1 to form a second fracturing fluid.


The two fluids were tested as described above. The results are set forth in FIG. 2, where the second fracturing fluid shows enhanced friction reduction over the entire time frame compared to the first fracturing fluid.


Example 3

This example illustrates the use of SigmaClean™, referred to as FR2, in a slick water fluid including 0.5 gpt of WFR-55LA (partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymer system within inverted emulsion), available from Clearwater International, LLC, or 0.5 gpt of WFR-62LA (partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymer system within an inverted emulstion, available from Clearwater International, LLC, with or without 0.075 gpt FR2.


To a slick water inverted fracturing fluid was added 0.5 gpt of WFR-55LA or 0.5 gpt WFR-62LA to form fracturing fluids without the friction reduction system. To the these slick water inverted fracturing fluids were added 0.075 gpt of FR2 to form fracturing fluids with the friction reduction system.


The fluids were tested as described above. The results are set forth in FIG. 3, where the fracturing fluids, with are all fresh water systems, show that the system with or without the friction reduction systems of this invention behave substantially the same.


Example 4

This example illustrates the use of SigmaClean™, BarDac™ LF and A-1458, referred to as FR2, FR3 and FR4 respectively, in a slick water inverted fracturing fluid including 1.0 gpt of WFR-62LA (partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymer system within an inverted emulsion), available from Clearwater International, LLC, with or without 0.15 gpt gluteraldehyde, 0.0375 gpt FR2, 0.075 gpt FR2, 0.15 gpt FR2, 0.15 gpt FR3, 0.0375 gpt FR4 and 0.15 gpt FR4. A-1458 is comprises about 77.0% w/w of benzyl-C12-16-alkyldimethylammonium chloride in a mixed solvent including water, isopropyl alcohol (IPA) and methanol.


To a slick water inverted fracturing fluid was added 1.0 gpt WFR-62LA to form a no FR fracturing fluid. To the same slick water inverted fracturing fluid was added 0.15 gpt gluteraldehyde, 0.0375 gpt FR2, 0.075 gpt FR2, 0.15 gpt FR2, 0.15 gpt FR3, 0.0375 gpt FR4 and 0.15 gpt FR4 to form the other fluids.


The fluids were tested as described above. The results are set forth in FIG. 4, where the fluids including FR2, FR3 and FR4 showed significant increases friction reduction compared to the blank fluid and the fluid including 0.15 gpt gluteraldehyde—a conventional biocide.


Example 5

This example illustrates the use of SigmaClean, referred to as FR2, in a slick water inverted fracturing fluid including 1.0 gpt of WFR-55LA (partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymer system within an inverted emulsion), available from Clearwater International, LLC, with or without 0.15 gpt FR2.


To a slick water inverted fracturing fluid was added 1.0 gpt WFR-55LA to form a first fracturing fluid. To the same slick water inverted fracturing fluid was added 1.0 gpt WFR-55LA and 0.15 gpt of FR2 to form a second fracturing fluid.


The two fluids were tested as described above. The results are set forth in FIG. 5, where the second fracturing fluid shows enhanced friction reduction at low temperature and both were essentially equally effective at higher temperature.


All references cited herein are incorporated by reference. Although the invention has been disclosed with reference to its preferred embodiments, from reading this description those of skill in the art may appreciate changes and modification that may be made which do not depart from the scope and spirit of the invention as described above and claimed hereafter.

Claims
  • 1. A method for fracturing a formation comprising: pumping a slick water fracturing composition into a formation at a pressure sufficient to fracture the formation, where the slick water fracturing composition includes a partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymer system within an inverted emulsion and an effective amount of a friction reducer booster system comprising one quaternary salts or a plurality of quaternary salts, where the effective amount is sufficient to reduce a drag friction of the composition by an additional amount of at least 5% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation in high salinity and low temperature environments compared to a composition in the absence of the friction reducer booster system.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the friction reducer booster system comprises: (1) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3ArN+X−, where R1 and R2 are carbyl group including 1 to 3 carbon atoms, R3 is a carbyl group including about 8 to about 20 carbon atoms, Ar is an aryl group and X−is a counterion, (2) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3R4N+X−, where R1 and R2 are carbyl group including 1 to 3 carbon atoms, R3 and R4 are a carbyl group including about 6 to about 10 carbon atoms, and X− is a counterion or (3) mixtures and combinations thereof, where X− includes chloride (Cl−), bromide (Br−), hydroxide (OH−), or mixtures thereof.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the friction reducer booster system comprises: (1) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3ArN+X−, where R1 and R2 are carbyl group including 1to 2 carbon atoms, R3 is a carbyl group including about 10 to about 18 carbon atoms, Ar is an aryl group and X− is a chloride, (2) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3R4N+X−, where R1 and R2 are carbyl group including 1 to 2 carbon atoms, R3 and R4 are a carbyl group including about 7 to about 9 carbon atoms, and X− is a chloride, or (3) mixtures and combinations thereof.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the friction reducer booster system comprises: (1) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3ArN+X−, where R1 and R2 are carbyl group including 1carbon atom, R3 is a carbyl group including about 12 to about 16 carbon atoms, Ar is an aryl group and X− is a chloride, (2) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3R4N+X−, where R1 and R2 are carbyl groups including 1 carbon atom, R3 and R4 are a carbyl group including 8 carbon atoms, and X− is a chloride, or (3) mixtures and combinations thereof.
  • 5. The method of claim 3, wherein the compound of the general formula R1R2R3ArN+X− comprises alkyl (C12-16),dimethylbenzylammonium chloride.
  • 6. The method of claim 3, wherein the compound of the general formula R1R2R3R4N+X− comprises 1-Octaminium, N,N-Dimetyl-N-Octyl-Chloride.
  • 7. The method of claim 3, wherein the compound of the general formula R1R2R3ArN+X− comprises alkyl (C12-16),dimethylbenzylammonium chloride and the compound of the general formula R1R2R3R4N+X− comprises 1-Octaminium, N,N-Dimetyl-N-Octyl-Chloride.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein the partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymers comprise polyacrylamide polymers having a molecular weight between about 1 million and about 50million and being partially hydrolyzed, where the degree of hydrolysis is between about 1% to about 50%.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymers comprise polymers having a molecular weight between about 5 million and about 40 million and being partially hydrolyzed, where the degree of hydrolysis is between about 1% to about 50%.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymers include, without limitation, polyacrylamide polymers having a molecular weight between about 10 million and about 30 million and being partially hydrolyzed, where the degree of hydrolysis is between about 1% to about 50%.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymers include, without limitation, polyacrylamide polymers having a molecular weight between about 20 million and about 30 million and being partially hydrolyzed, where the degree of hydrolysis is between about 1% to about 50%.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the effective amount is sufficient to reduce the drag friction of the composition by an additional amount of at least 10% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation in high salinity and low temperature environments compared to a composition in the absence of the friction reducer booster system.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the effective amount is sufficient to reduce the drag friction of the composition by an additional amount of at least 12% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation in high salinity and low temperature environments compared to a composition in the absence of the friction reducer booster system.
  • 14. A slick water fracturing composition comprising from about 0.01 to about 2.5 gpt of an inverted emulsion including between about 25 wt. % and about 35 wt. % of a partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymer system and an effective amount of a friction reducing booster system comprising one quaternary salts or a plurality of quaternary salts, where the effective amount is sufficient to reduce a drag friction of the composition by an additional of at least 5% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation in high salinity aqueous solutions and/or temperature environments compared to the tests in the absence of the friction reducer booster system.
  • 15. The composition of claim 14, wherein the friction reducer booster system comprises: (1) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3ArN+X−, where R1 and R2 are carbyl group including 1 to 3 carbon atoms, R3 is a carbyl group including about 8 to about 20 carbon atoms, Ar is an aryl group and X− is a counterion, (2) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3R4N+X−, where R1 and R2 are carbyl group including 1 to 3 carbon atoms, R3 and R4 are a carbyl group including about 6 to about 10 carbon atoms, and X− is a counterion or (3) mixtures and combinations thereof, where X− includes chloride (Cl−), bromide (Br−), hydroxide (OH−), or mixtures thereof.
  • 16. The composition of claim 14, wherein the friction reducer booster system comprises: (1) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3ArN+X−, where R1 and R2 are carbyl group including 1 to 2 carbon atoms, R3 is a carbyl group including about 10 to about 18 carbon atoms, Ar is an aryl group and X− is a chloride, (2) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3R4N+X−, where R1 and R2 are carbyl group including 1 to 2 carbon atoms, R3 and R4 are a carbyl group including about 7 to about 9 carbon atoms, and X− is a chloride, or (3) mixtures and combinations thereof.
  • 17. The composition of claim 14, wherein the friction reducer booster system comprises: (1) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3ArN+X−, where R1 and R2 are carbyl group including 1carbon atom, R3 is a carbyl group including about 12 to about 16 carbon atoms, Ar is an aryl group and X− is a chloride, (2) compounds of the general formula R1R2R3R4N+X−, where R1 and R2 are carbyl groups including 1 carbon atom, R3 and R4 are a carbyl group including 8 carbon atoms, and X− is a chloride, or (3) mixtures and combinations thereof.
  • 18. The composition of claim 17, wherein the compound of the general formula R1R2R3ArN+X− comprises alkyl (C12-16),dimethylbenzylammonium chloride.
  • 19. The composition of claim 17, wherein the compound of the general formula R1R2R3R4N+X− comprises 1-octaminium, N,N-dimetyl-N-octyl-chloride.
  • 20. The composition of claim 17, wherein the compound of the general formula R1R2R3ArN+X− comprises alkyl (C12-16),dimethylbenzylammonium chloride and the compound of the general formula R1R2R3R4N+X− comprises 1-octaminium, N,N-dimetyl-N-octyl-chloride.
  • 21. The composition of claim 14, wherein the partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymers comprise polyacrylamide polymers having a molecular weight between about 1 million and about 50 million and being partially hydrolyzed, where the degree of hydrolysis is between about 1% to about 50%.
  • 22. The composition of claim 14, wherein the partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymers comprise polymers having a molecular weight between about 5 million and about 40 million and being partially hydrolyzed, where the degree of hydrolysis is between about 1% to about 50%.
  • 23. The composition of claim 14, wherein the partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymers include, without limitation, polyacrylamide polymers having a molecular weight between about 10million and about 30 million and being partially hydrolyzed, where the degree of hydrolysis is between about 1% to about 50%.
  • 24. The composition of claim 14, wherein the partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide polymers include, without limitation, polyacrylamide polymers having a molecular weight between about 20million and about 30 million and being partially hydrolyzed, where the degree of hydrolysis is between about 1% to about 50%.
  • 25. The composition of claim 14, wherein the effective amount is sufficient to reduce a drag friction of the composition by an additional of at least 12% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation in an aqueous solution with salinity higher than 100,000 ppm and/or temperature as low as 32° F. compared to the tests in the absence of the friction reducer booster system.
  • 26. The composition of claim 14, wherein the effective amount is sufficient to reduce the drag friction of the composition by an additional amount of at least 10% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation in high salinity and low temperature environments compared to a composition in the absence of the friction reducer booster system.
  • 27. The composition of claim 14, wherein the effective amount is sufficient to reduce the drag friction of the composition by an additional amount of at least 12% in the first 30 seconds of evaluation in high salinity and low temperature environments compared to a composition in the absence of the friction reducer booster system.
US Referenced Citations (201)
Number Name Date Kind
2196042 Timpson Apr 1940 A
2390153 Kern Dec 1945 A
2805958 Bueche et al. Jul 1959 A
3059909 Wise Oct 1962 A
3163219 Wyant et al. Dec 1964 A
3301723 Chrisp Jan 1967 A
3301848 Halleck Jan 1967 A
3303896 Tillotson et al. Feb 1967 A
3317430 Priestley et al. May 1967 A
3565176 Wittenwyler Feb 1971 A
3856921 Shrier et al. Dec 1974 A
3888312 Tiner et al. Jun 1975 A
3933205 Kiel Jan 1976 A
3937283 Blauer et al. Feb 1976 A
3960736 Free et al. Jun 1976 A
3965982 Medlin Jun 1976 A
3990978 Hill Nov 1976 A
4007792 Meister Feb 1977 A
4052159 Fuerst et al. Oct 1977 A
4067389 Savins Jan 1978 A
4108782 Thompson Aug 1978 A
4112050 Sartori et al. Sep 1978 A
4112051 Sartori et al. Sep 1978 A
4112052 Sartori et al. Sep 1978 A
4113631 Thompson Sep 1978 A
4318835 Clarke Mar 1982 A
4378845 Medlin et al. Apr 1983 A
4461716 Barbarin et al. Jul 1984 A
4479041 Fenwick et al. Oct 1984 A
4506734 Nolte Mar 1985 A
4514309 Wadhwa Apr 1985 A
4541935 Constien et al. Sep 1985 A
4549608 Stowe et al. Oct 1985 A
4561985 Glass, Jr. Dec 1985 A
4623021 Stowe Nov 1986 A
4654266 Kachnik Mar 1987 A
4657081 Hodge Apr 1987 A
4660643 Perkins Apr 1987 A
4683068 Kucera Jul 1987 A
4686052 Baranet et al. Aug 1987 A
4695389 Kubala Sep 1987 A
4705113 Perkins Nov 1987 A
4714115 Uhri Dec 1987 A
4718490 Uhri Jan 1988 A
4724905 Uhri Feb 1988 A
4725372 Teot et al. Feb 1988 A
4739834 Peiffer et al. Apr 1988 A
4741401 Walles et al. May 1988 A
4748011 Baize May 1988 A
4779680 Sydansk Oct 1988 A
4795574 Syrinek et al. Jan 1989 A
4817717 Jennings, Jr. et al. Apr 1989 A
4830106 Uhri May 1989 A
4846277 Khalil et al. Jul 1989 A
4848468 Hazlett et al. Jul 1989 A
4852650 Jennings, Jr. et al. Aug 1989 A
4869322 Vogt, Jr. et al. Sep 1989 A
4892147 Jennings, Jr. et al. Jan 1990 A
4926940 Stromswold May 1990 A
4938286 Jennings, Jr. Jul 1990 A
4978512 Dillon Dec 1990 A
5005645 Jennings, Jr. et al. Apr 1991 A
5024276 Borchardt Jun 1991 A
5067556 Fudono et al. Nov 1991 A
5074359 Schmidt Dec 1991 A
5074991 Weers Dec 1991 A
5082579 Dawson Jan 1992 A
5106518 Cooney et al. Apr 1992 A
5110486 Manalastas et al. May 1992 A
5169411 Weers Dec 1992 A
5224546 Smith et al. Jul 1993 A
5228510 Jennings, Jr. et al. Jul 1993 A
5246073 Sandiford et al. Sep 1993 A
5259455 Nimerick et al. Nov 1993 A
5330005 Card et al. Jul 1994 A
5342530 Aften et al. Aug 1994 A
5347004 Rivers et al. Sep 1994 A
5363919 Jennings, Jr. Nov 1994 A
5402846 Jennings, Jr. et al. Apr 1995 A
5411091 Jennings, Jr. May 1995 A
5424284 Patel et al. Jun 1995 A
5439055 Card et al. Aug 1995 A
5462721 Pounds et al. Oct 1995 A
5465792 Dawson et al. Nov 1995 A
5472049 Chaffe et al. Dec 1995 A
5482116 El-Rabaa et al. Jan 1996 A
5488083 Kinsey, III et al. Jan 1996 A
5497831 Hainey et al. Mar 1996 A
5501275 Card et al. Mar 1996 A
5551516 Norman et al. Sep 1996 A
5624886 Dawson et al. Apr 1997 A
5635458 Lee et al. Jun 1997 A
5649596 Jones et al. Jul 1997 A
5669447 Walker et al. Sep 1997 A
5674377 Sullivan, III et al. Oct 1997 A
5688478 Pounds et al. Nov 1997 A
5693837 Smith et al. Dec 1997 A
5711396 Joerg et al. Jan 1998 A
5722490 Ebinger Mar 1998 A
5744024 Sullivan, III et al. Apr 1998 A
5755286 Ebinger May 1998 A
5775425 Weaver et al. Jul 1998 A
5787986 Weaver et al. Aug 1998 A
5806597 Tjon-Joe-Pin et al. Sep 1998 A
5807812 Smith et al. Sep 1998 A
5833000 Weaver et al. Nov 1998 A
5853048 Weaver et al. Dec 1998 A
5871049 Weaver et al. Feb 1999 A
5877127 Card et al. Mar 1999 A
5908073 Nguyen et al. Jun 1999 A
5908814 Patel et al. Jun 1999 A
5964295 Brown et al. Oct 1999 A
5979557 Card et al. Nov 1999 A
5980845 Cherry Nov 1999 A
6016871 Burts, Jr. Jan 2000 A
6035936 Whalen Mar 2000 A
6047772 Weaver et al. Apr 2000 A
6054417 Graham et al. Apr 2000 A
6059034 Rickards et al. May 2000 A
6060436 Snyder et al. May 2000 A
6069118 Hinkel et al. May 2000 A
6123394 Jeffrey Sep 2000 A
6133205 Jones Oct 2000 A
6147034 Jones et al. Nov 2000 A
6162449 Maier et al. Dec 2000 A
6162766 Muir et al. Dec 2000 A
6169058 Le et al. Jan 2001 B1
6228812 Dawson et al. May 2001 B1
6247543 Patel et al. Jun 2001 B1
6267938 Warrender et al. Jul 2001 B1
6283212 Hinkel et al. Sep 2001 B1
6291405 Lee et al. Sep 2001 B1
6330916 Rickards et al. Dec 2001 B1
6435277 Qu et al. Aug 2002 B1
6725931 Nguyen et al. Apr 2004 B2
6756345 Pakulski et al. Jun 2004 B2
6793018 Dawson et al. Sep 2004 B2
6832650 Nguyen et al. Dec 2004 B2
6875728 Gupta et al. Apr 2005 B2
7140433 Gatlin et al. Nov 2006 B2
7268100 Kippie et al. Sep 2007 B2
7350579 Gatlin et al. Apr 2008 B2
7392847 Gatlin et al. Jul 2008 B2
7517447 Gatlin Apr 2009 B2
7565933 Kippie et al. Jul 2009 B2
7566686 Kippie et al. Jul 2009 B2
7712534 Bryant et al. May 2010 B2
7712535 Venditto et al. May 2010 B2
7767628 Kippie et al. Aug 2010 B2
7829510 Gatlin et al. Nov 2010 B2
7846878 Robb et al. Dec 2010 B2
7886824 Kakadjian et al. Feb 2011 B2
7915203 Falana et al. Mar 2011 B2
7932214 Zamora et al. Apr 2011 B2
7942201 Ekstrand et al. May 2011 B2
7956017 Gatlin et al. Jun 2011 B2
7956217 Falana et al. Jun 2011 B2
7971659 Gatlin et al. Jul 2011 B2
7989404 Kakadjian et al. Aug 2011 B2
7992653 Zamora et al. Aug 2011 B2
8011431 van Petegen Sep 2011 B2
8012913 Gatlin et al. Sep 2011 B2
8028755 Darnell et al. Oct 2011 B2
8034750 Thompson et al. Oct 2011 B2
8065905 Sweeney et al. Nov 2011 B2
8084401 Lukocs et al. Dec 2011 B2
8093431 Falana et al. Jan 2012 B2
8097567 Wilson, Jr. Jan 2012 B2
8099997 Curr et al. Jan 2012 B2
8141661 Kakadjian et al. Mar 2012 B2
8158562 Wilson, Jr. et al. Apr 2012 B2
8172952 Wanner et al. May 2012 B2
20020049256 Bergeron, Jr. Apr 2002 A1
20020165308 Kinniard et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030220204 Baran, Jr. et al. Nov 2003 A1
20050045330 Nguyen et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050092489 Welton et al. May 2005 A1
20050137114 Gatlin et al. Jun 2005 A1
20060194700 Gatlin et al. Aug 2006 A1
20080251252 Schwartz Oct 2008 A1
20080318812 Kakadjian, Sr. et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090250659 Gatlin Oct 2009 A1
20090275488 Zamora et al. Nov 2009 A1
20100077938 Zamora et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100190666 Ali et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100212905 van Petegen Aug 2010 A1
20100252262 Ekstrand et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100292108 Kakadjian Nov 2010 A1
20100305010 Falana et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100311620 Kakadjian et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110001083 Falana et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110005756 Kakadjian et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110240131 Parker Oct 2011 A1
20110247821 Thompson et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110284247 Zamora et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110284248 Zamora et al. Nov 2011 A1
20120071366 Falana et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120071367 Falana et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120071370 Falana et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120073813 Zamora et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120137752 Morrow Jun 2012 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
U.S. Appl. No. 13/117,304, filed May 27, 2011, Falana et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/247,985, filed Sep. 29, 2011, Veldman et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/109,712, filed May 17, 2011, Falana et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/102,053, filed May 6, 2011, Falana et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/094,806, filed Apr. 16, 2011, Zamora et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/348,267, filed Jan. 11, 2012, Kakadjian et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/249,819, filed Sep. 30, 2011, Falana et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/348,279, filed Jan. 11, 2012, Falana et al.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120245061 A1 Sep 2012 US