Certain embodiments of the present disclosure relate to radio frequency (RF) duplexers that may be used in wireless communication systems, for example. More specifically, certain embodiments of the disclosure relate to a method and system for enhancing isolation in hybrid-based RF duplexers and multiplexers.
Existing methods and systems for enhancing isolation in hybrid-based RF duplexers and multiplexers can be costly, cumbersome and inefficient. Further limitations and disadvantages of conventional and traditional approaches will become apparent to one of skill in the art, through comparison of such systems with the present disclosure as set forth in the remainder of the present application with reference to the drawings.
A system and/or method for enhancing isolation in hybrid-based radio frequency (RF) duplexers and multiplexers, substantially as shown in and/or described in connection with at least one of the figures, as set forth more completely in the claims.
Various advantages, aspects and novel features of the present disclosure, as well as details of an illustrated embodiment thereof, will be more fully understood from the following description and drawings.
The drawings are of illustrative embodiments. They do not illustrate all embodiments. Other embodiments may be used in addition or instead. Details that may be apparent or unnecessary may be omitted to save space or for more effective illustration. Some embodiments may be practiced with additional components or steps and/or without all of the components or steps that are illustrated. When the same numeral appears in different drawings, it refers to the same or like components or steps.
As utilized herein the terms “circuit” and “circuitry” refer to physical electronic components (i.e., hardware) and any software and/or firmware (“code”) which may configure the hardware, be executed by the hardware, and/or otherwise be associated with the hardware. As utilized herein, “and/or” means any one or more of the items in the list joined by “and/or”. As an example, “x and/or y” means any element of the three-element set {(x), (y), (x, y)}. As another example, “x, y, and/or z” means any element of the seven-element set {(x), (y), (z), (x, y), (x, z), (y, z), (x, y, z)}. As utilized herein, the term “exemplary” means serving as a non-limiting example, instance, or illustration. As utilized herein, the terms “e.g.” and “for example” set off lists of one or more non-limiting examples, instances, or illustrations.
The components, steps, features, objects, benefits and advantages which have been discussed are merely illustrative. None of them, nor the discussions relating to them, are intended to limit the scope of protection in any way. Numerous other embodiments are also contemplated. These include embodiments which have fewer, additional, and/or different components, steps, features, objects, benefits and advantages. These also include embodiments in which the components and/or steps are arranged and/or ordered differently.
Unless otherwise stated, all measurements, values, ratings, positions, magnitudes, sizes, and other specifications that are set forth in this specification, including in the claims that follow, are approximate, not exact. They are intended to have a reasonable range that is consistent with the functions to which they relate and with what is customary in the art to which they pertain.
All articles, patents, patent applications, and other publications that have been cited in this disclosure are incorporated herein by reference.
The phrase “means for” when used in a claim is intended to and should be interpreted to embrace the corresponding structures and materials that have been described and their equivalents. Similarly, the phrase “step for” when used in a claim is intended to and should be interpreted to embrace the corresponding acts that have been described and their equivalents. The absence of these phrases from a claim means that the claim is not intended to and should not be interpreted to be limited to these corresponding structures, materials, or acts, or to their equivalents.
Relational terms such as “first” and “second” and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another, without necessarily requiring or implying any actual relationship or order between them. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” and any other variation thereof when used in connection with a list of elements in the specification or claims are intended to indicate that the list is not exclusive and that other elements may be included. Similarly, an element preceded by an “a” or an “an” does not, without further constraints, preclude the existence of additional elements of the identical type.
Illustrative embodiments are now described. Other embodiments may be used in addition or instead. Details that may be apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art may have been omitted. Some embodiments may be practiced with additional components or steps and/or without all of the components or steps that are described.
Some embodiments according to the present disclosure provide RF duplexers and RF multiplexers that can be used in wireless communication systems including, for example, those that support Frequency Division Duplexing (FDD), multi-channel or multi-band communications, and carrier aggregation.
Some embodiments according to the present disclosure provide RF duplexers and RF multiplexers that are characterized by one or more of the following: a low insertion loss from each port to the common port, high port-to-port isolation, high linearity, an ability to handle large signals (power handling), a compact size, manufacturability, and a low cost.
Some embodiments according to the present disclosure contemplate that requirements for RF duplexers and RF multiplexers have become more stringent in light of new communication standards where frequency bands are closer to each other; the need to support multiple standards in one platform; cost- and footprint-sensitive platforms such as smartphones; and co-existing communication systems where multiple communication transmitters and receivers work simultaneously.
Due to linearity, noise, and power handling requirements, some embodiments according to the present disclosure contemplate using passive RF duplexers and RF multiplexers for some applications. Due to the selectivity and isolation requirements, some embodiments according to the present disclosure contemplate using high-order filters that employ high quality factor (Q) components in the RF duplexer and the RF multiplexer.
Some embodiments according to the present disclosure solve one or more of the following problems: high-Q components can be costly; components can be larger to increase their Q; and tunable components provide lower Q compared to non-tunable counterparts.
Some embodiments according to the present disclosure contemplate using various technologies to realize RF duplexers and RF multiplexers. For instance, handheld consumer wireless devices can use acoustic technologies such as Surface Acoustic Wave (SAW) and Bulk Acoustic Wave (BAW) technologies to realize RF duplexers and RF multiplexers. These technologies offer high-Q, compact RF resonators suitable for filters, duplexers, and multiplexers with limited, yet sufficient, power handling capabilities for handheld devices. Commercial wireless infrastructure platforms such as base stations, repeaters, access points, and routers may use either acoustic or dielectric resonators (e.g., air cavity or ceramic resonators) to realize highly-selective, low-loss, linear RF filters, RF duplexers, and RF multiplexers with higher isolation and power handling requirements.
Some embodiments according to the present disclosure support multiple frequency bands and wireless standards within the same platform (either handheld or infrastructure systems). Some embodiments according to the present disclosure provide reconfigurable or tunable radio frequency components such as filters, duplexers, and multiplexers, for example.
Some embodiments according to the present disclosure provide piezoelectric material that can be used to realize compact high-Q resonators. Crystal resonators can provide spectrally-pure oscillators. SAW resonators can provide compact low-loss selective RF filters and duplexers as well as oscillators. Further, BAW resonators can be used to construct high-performance RF filters and duplexers as well as oscillators. Ceramic resonators and micro-electro-mechanical system (MEMS) resonators with high quality factor can be used in frequency generation as well as filtering applications.
In some embodiments according to the present disclosure, RF SAW filters and RF duplexers can be used in wireless communications such as cellular phones, wireless local area network (WLAN) transceivers, global positioning system (GPS) receivers, cordless phones, wireless phones, mobile phones, smartphones, tablets, laptops, and so forth. RF SAW filters can be used as band-select filters, image-reject filters, intermediate frequency (IF) filters, transmitter noise or spur reduction filters, and so forth. An exemplary smartphone can have several SAW resonators, SAW filters, and SAW duplexers to support various communication systems and standards.
Some embodiments according to the present disclosure contemplate that BAW resonators can have a lower loss (or a higher Q) or are more compact, especially at higher frequencies, when compared with SAW resonators. RF filters and duplexers that use BAW resonators may benefit from a lower insertion loss, or a higher selectivity, or a smaller form factor when compared with RF filters and duplexers that use SAW resonators, especially at higher frequencies. Thin film bulk acoustic resonators (FBARs) are exemplary examples of BAW resonators.
Wireless communication standards designate many different operational frequency bands to support the increase in the overall wireless capacity and reach. For instance, cellular phone standards may include RF frequency bands that range from approximately 700 MHz to approximately 4000 MHz. Furthermore, in order to increase the overall wireless capacity, the frequency spacing between adjacent frequency bands or channels within the same application or different applications may be reduced. This may be done, for instance, by reducing the guard bands in the wireless standard or by placing the transmit and receive frequency bands in an FDD scheme closer to each other. As a result, some embodiments of the present disclosure provide RF filters and duplexers with higher selectivity. More selective RF filters and duplexers that utilize a given component or technology (e.g., SAW, BAW, etc.) might incur more in-band insertion loss. The higher RF filter or duplexer insertion loss may reduce the wireless receiver noise figure and sensitivity, increase the wireless transmitter power consumption or reduce the transmitted power, and/or deteriorate the overall performance of a communication system.
In commercial systems, some embodiments of the present disclosure contemplate that the choice of technology may depend on the technical performance, such as power consumption as well as economic and business considerations such as cost, size, and time to market. For instance, while one technology may offer a better performance compared with another technology, it may not be adopted for a commercial system that is cost sensitive. In the case of RF filters and duplexers, it may be desirable to use a technology that provides the lowest-cost and/or most-compact solution, as long as a predetermined performance criterion is met. In other words, a more expensive or larger solution may not be adopted, even if it offers a better performance as compared with an alternative solution that meets an acceptable performance level at a lower cost and/or size. For instance, while RF filters and duplexers that use BAW resonators may offer lower loss compared with RF filters and duplexers that use SAW resonators for a given set of specifications, the higher relative cost of BAW technology, as well as its relatively smaller number of suppliers, may disfavor their usage in certain applications and standards. Other considerations may include, for example, the ease of integration with the rest of the components in a communication system. For instance, there may be performance, business, or economic advantages to integrate RF filters and duplexers with low noise amplifiers (LNAs), power amplifiers (PAs), transmit/receive (T/R) or band-select switches, impedance matching networks, etc. A wireless communication device, such as a smartphone, can include a number of SAW filters and duplexers as well as a number of BAW filter and duplexers. Each SAW or BAW filter or duplexer may be used for a specific communication application, standard, or frequency band.
Some embodiments according to the present disclosure provide architectural solutions that enable realization of highly-selective, low-loss RF duplexers with high-isolation between transmit and receive bands. Specifically, some embodiments according to the present disclosure provide a lower cost or more compact technology within an innovative architecture that satisfies a comparable or better specification compared to what can be achieved using a more expensive or less compact technology. Exemplary embodiments might include replacing BAW duplexers with SAW duplexers using an innovative architecture, or replacing ceramic or cavity duplexers with BAW duplexers using an innovative architecture.
An exemplary method for designing acoustic resonator based filters and duplexers begins by deciding upon the number of resonators to be used which can depend on the required stopband rejection for the filters or the required isolation for the duplexers. The larger the number of resonators used in filter design, the larger may be the order of the filter and the sharper may be the filter roll-off around passband. Sharper filter roll-off may provide higher stopband rejection. Similarly, the number of resonators used in the transmit (TX) and receive (RX) filters of the duplexer may determine the total isolation from TX to RX. The larger the order of the TX and RX filters (e.g., the larger the number of resonators used in the filters), the larger may be the amount of isolation between TX and RX. Due to the limited quality factor of the acoustic resonators, the insertion loss in the filter and duplexer may be directly proportional to the number of the resonators used. In other words, the larger the order of the filter and the TX and RX filter, the larger may be the loss of the filter and duplexer, respectively. Some embodiments according to the present disclosure contemplate overcoming this insertion loss and isolation or stopband rejection tradeoff by incorporating hybrid couplers in the design of the filters and duplexers.
There are several non-idealities associated with the design of the RF duplexer 100 in
Practical quadrature hybrid couplers, such as quadrature hybrid couplers 104 and 107, demonstrate amplitude and phase mismatches at their ports. The scattering parameters of an ideal symmetric quadrature hybrid coupler may be expressed as
In such an ideal hybrid coupler, the insertion loss from port one to the through and coupled ports is −3 dB, i.e., |S21|=|S31|=1/√2, and the phase difference in the transfer functions between ports one and two, and ports one and three is 90°, i.e., S21−S31=90°. However, in practice, neither condition holds; in other words, in a practical realization of a hybrid coupler, |S21|≠|S31| and S21−S31≠90°; these are referred to as amplitude mismatch and phase mismatch.
Another non-ideality of a quadrature hybrid coupler is the non-zero isolation between the otherwise ideally isolated ports. In an ideal duplexer described above, ports 2 and 3 are fully isolated as shown by S23=S32=0. However, in a practical RF duplexer, the isolation is often non-zero. Due to the non-zero isolation, the isolation deteriorates between ports 102 and 109. The insertion loss also deteriorates between ports 102 and 103, and between ports 103 and 109. For instance, due to non-zero isolation in the quadrature hybrid coupler 107, some of the signal at the port 109 might be lost in a termination 108 as opposed to reaching the common port 103. This provides higher insertion loss between ports 103 and 109. For instance, due to the non-zero isolation in the quadrature hybrid coupler 104, some of the f2 signal component from the common port 103 may be leaked to the port 102 (e.g., only seeing attenuation of f1 filter); this can translate into less isolation between the ports 102 and 109.
In practice, the f2 filters 105 and 106 are not identical. Specifically, the input-output transfer functions as well as input reflection coefficients of f2 filters 105 and 106 are not identical.
The combined effect of the amplitude and phase mismatch in the quadrature hybrid couplers 104 and 107, the non-zero isolation in the quadrature hybrid couplers 104 and 107, and the non-identical response of f2 filters 105 and 106 may cause asymmetries in the RF duplexer 100. As such, ports 102 and 109 might not be completely isolated anymore. High isolation is desired in RF duplexers. For instance, the desired isolation between transmit and receive ports of a commercial RF duplexer for certain handheld devices may be over 50 dB, whereas the same specification for an infrastructure base station device may be over 75 dB.
Some embodiments according to the present disclosure provide solutions that increase the isolation and maintain a low insertion loss in the duplexer 100 under practical scenarios including, for example, the amplitude and phase mismatch in the quadrature hybrid couplers 104 and 107, the non-zero isolation of the quadrature hybrid couplers 104, 107, and/or the non-identical response of f2 filters 105 and 106.
Any or all of capacitors 210, 211, and 212 may be realized within a package or a printed circuit board that includes the duplexer components so that it does not add to the overall cost or footprint. For instance, some or part of any of these capacitors 210, 211, and 212 may be realized through the capacitance of the interconnect lines.
In an exemplary embodiment, the capacitor 210 provides intentional coupling across the two hybrid ports that are otherwise meant to be isolated. This intentional coupling, when properly designed, can cancel out the effect of inherent unwanted coupling between these ports so that the overall duplexer isolation between ports 202 and 209 is enhanced. Some embodiments contemplate that a single capacitor 210 can enhance the duplexer isolation between ports 202 and 209 due to poor isolation in either of the quadrature hybrid couplers 204 or 207. In other exemplary embodiments, capacitor 210 can be placed on either side of the quadrature hybrid coupler 204 or on either side of the quadrature hybrid coupler 207.
Some embodiments provide that capacitors 211 and 212 can improve duplexer performance, especially the isolation between ports 202 and 209, in the presence of non-idealities, especially asymmetry caused by amplitude and phase mismatches in the quadrature hybrid couplers 204 and 207, and by the mismatch between f2 filters 205 and 206. In some embodiments, the capacitors 211 and 212 can be placed on either side of the quadrature hybrid coupler 204 or on either side of the quadrature hybrid coupler 207. The values for the capacitors 211 and 212 may be different or the same. In some embodiments, only one of capacitors 211 and 212 is used to achieve a desired set of specifications.
Some embodiments contemplate that the value of the terminating impedance 208 provides another degree of freedom to enable high isolation between 202 and 209 ports. The impedance 208, ideally set to the terminating impedance of all the other ports at 50Ω, for example, may have to be different in a practical design due to the aforementioned non-idealities as well as the impedance mismatches at any of the ports. In a practical design, the impedance 208 may have both resistive and reactive components, for example.
Furthermore, duplexer specifications including, for example, frequency bands f1 and f2, and insertion loss and isolation requirements may be different across different settings in a tunable/reconfigurable RF duplexer. In short, fixed values for capacitors 310, 311, and 312 might not be sufficient to satisfy the desired RF duplexer specifications for all the settings. Therefore, in a tunable or reconfigurable RF duplexer 300a, tunable or variable capacitors 310, 311, and 312 may be used. The values for the capacitors 310, 311, 312 can be selected to satisfy the RF duplexer specification across all the settings (e.g., different frequency bands of interest). Similar to the previous exemplary embodiment described above with respect to
In some embodiments, the proper settings (e.g., desired settings) for the tunable capacitors 511 and 512 may be the same or different for different settings in the tunable or reconfigurable RF duplexer 500. The proper settings for tunable capacitors 511 and 512, along with those for tunable capacitors 515, 516 in the tunable f2 filters 505 and 506, may be determined during assembly and testing of the RF duplexer 500. These settings may be stored in a memory (e.g., a non-transitory memory) for future use. The proper values for the tunable capacitors 511 and 512 may be determined through determination on duplexer performance metrics such as isolation or insertion loss.
In some embodiments, the proper settings for tunable capacitors 511 and 512, along with those for tunable capacitors 515, 516 in the tunable f2 filters 505 and 506, may be determined by a wireless communication device that utilizes the RF duplexer 500. The control signals for the tunable f1 filter 501, or the tunable f2 filters 505 and 506, or the tunable capacitors 511 and 512 may be analog or digital signals. An analog control signal may be supplied through a digital-to-analog converter (DAC). The digital control signals, once determined, may be stored in a memory or register to be recalled later as needed.
Some embodiments of the RF duplexers according to the present disclosure may be used in handheld portable devices supporting wireless communications such as a mobile phones, cellular phones, smartphones, tablets, laptops, smartwatches, etc. Some embodiments of the RF duplexers according to the present disclosure may be used in devices supporting the wireless communication infrastructure such as base stations (including macro-, micro-, pico-, and femto-base stations), repeaters, etc. Some embodiments of the RF duplexers according to the present disclosure may enable compact multiband, multi-standard wireless communication devices, wireless communication devices that support carrier aggregation, and wireless communication devices that support frequency division duplexing (FDD).
Other embodiments of the disclosure may provide a non-transitory computer readable medium and/or storage medium, and/or a non-transitory machine readable medium and/or storage medium, having stored thereon, a machine code and/or a computer program having at least one code section executable by a machine and/or a computer, thereby causing the machine and/or computer to perform some or all of the steps as described herein for enhancing isolation in hybrid-based RF duplexers and multiplexers.
Accordingly, aspects of the present disclosure may be realized in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. The present disclosure may be realized in a centralized fashion in at least one computer system or in a distributed fashion where different elements are spread across several interconnected computer systems. Any kind of computer system or other apparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein is suited. A combination of hardware and software may be a general-purpose computer system with a computer program that, when being loaded and executed, controls the computer system such that it carries out the methods described herein.
Aspects of the present disclosure may also be embedded in a computer program product, which comprises all the features enabling the implementation of the methods described herein, and which when loaded in a computer system is able to carry out these methods. Computer program in the present context means any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended to cause a system having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after either or both of the following: a) conversion to another language, code or notation; b) reproduction in a different material form.
While the present disclosure has been described with reference to certain embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the present disclosure without departing from its scope. Therefore, it is intended that the present disclosure not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed, but that the present disclosure will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
The scope of protection is limited solely by the claims that now follow. That scope is intended and should be interpreted to be as broad as is consistent with the ordinary meaning of the language that is used in the claims when interpreted in light of this specification and the prosecution history that follows, except where specific meanings have been set forth, and to encompass all structural and functional equivalents.
This patent application makes reference to, claims priority to, and claims benefit from U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/397,727, filed on Sep. 21, 2016.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2561212 | Lewis | Jul 1951 | A |
3025463 | Luoma et al. | Mar 1962 | A |
3453638 | Hoovler | Jul 1969 | A |
3704409 | Oomen | Nov 1972 | A |
3800218 | Shekel | Mar 1974 | A |
4029902 | Bell et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4146851 | Dempsey et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4427936 | Riblet et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4464675 | Balaban et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4489271 | Riblet | Dec 1984 | A |
4694266 | Wright | Sep 1987 | A |
4721901 | Ashley | Jan 1988 | A |
4963945 | Cooper et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4964945 | Cooper et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4968967 | Stove | Nov 1990 | A |
5408690 | Ishikawa et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5483248 | Milroy | Jan 1996 | A |
5493246 | Anderson | Feb 1996 | A |
5525945 | Chiappetta et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5574400 | Fukuchi | Nov 1996 | A |
5691978 | Kenworthy | Nov 1997 | A |
5781084 | Rhodes | Jul 1998 | A |
6178310 | Jeong | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6194980 | Thon | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6229992 | McGeehan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6262637 | Bradley et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6297711 | Seward et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6496061 | Bloom | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6580729 | Grandchamp et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6721544 | Franca-Neto | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6819302 | Volman | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6946847 | Nishimori et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7072614 | Kasperkovitz | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7116966 | Hattori et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123883 | Mages | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7250830 | Layne et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7283793 | McKay | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7330500 | Kouki | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7369811 | Bellatoni et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7623005 | Johansson et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7633435 | Meharry et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7636388 | Wang et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7711329 | Aparin et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7804383 | Volatier et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7894779 | Meiyappan et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8013690 | Miyashiro | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8135348 | Aparin | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8149742 | Sorsby | Apr 2012 | B1 |
8199681 | Zinser et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8385871 | Wyville | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8422412 | Hahn | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8514035 | Mikhemar et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8600329 | Comeau et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8620246 | McKinzie et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8749321 | Kim et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8761026 | Berry et al. | Jun 2014 | B1 |
8942657 | McKinzie et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8957742 | Spears et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9048805 | Granger et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9214718 | Mow et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9450553 | Langer et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9479214 | Webb et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9490866 | Goel et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9500727 | Sohn et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9543630 | Tokumitsu et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9590794 | Behnam et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
20020089396 | Noguchi et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030109077 | Kim et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040000425 | White et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040127178 | Kuffner | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040180633 | Nakatani et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050070232 | Mages | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050245213 | Hirano et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050289632 | Brooks | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060019611 | Mages | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070105509 | Muhammad | May 2007 | A1 |
20080128901 | Zurcher et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080227409 | Chang et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240000 | Kidd | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080261519 | Demarco et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090054008 | Satou | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090121797 | Karabatsos | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125253 | Blair et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090221258 | Steinbuch | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090252252 | Kim et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090253385 | Dent et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090289744 | Miyashiro | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100002620 | Proctor et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100084146 | Roberts | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100109771 | Baik et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100127795 | Bauer et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100134700 | Robert et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100148886 | Inoue et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100177917 | Van Der Werf | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100323654 | Judson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110032079 | Bloy | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110069644 | Kim et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110080229 | Kennington | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110080856 | Kenington | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110134810 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110140803 | Kim et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110227664 | Wyville | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110256857 | Chen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120007605 | Benedikt | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120063496 | Giannini et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120075069 | Dickey et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120094617 | Tone et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120099624 | Nagaya et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120140860 | Rimini et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154071 | Bradley et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120161784 | Benedikt | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120163245 | Tone et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120194269 | Schlager | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120201153 | Bharadia et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120201173 | Jain et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120212304 | Zhang et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120230227 | Weiss | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130010654 | Kushnir | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130016634 | Smiley | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130063299 | Proudkii | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130065542 | Proudkii | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130079641 | Zwirn | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130083703 | Granger-Jones | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130109330 | Sahota et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130113576 | Inoue et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130130619 | Harverson et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130154887 | Hein et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130190036 | Zhao | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130201880 | Bauder | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130201881 | Bauder et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130201882 | Bauder et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130222059 | Kilambi et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130241655 | Liss et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130241656 | Tajima et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130241669 | Mikhemar et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130242809 | Tone et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130245976 | Hind | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130287144 | Paulin et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130301488 | Hong et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130321097 | Khlat et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140103946 | Vanden Bossche | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140140860 | Tibbott et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140154981 | Nakatani | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140169236 | Choi et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140194073 | Wyville et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140204808 | Choi et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140348018 | Bharadia et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140376419 | Goel et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150049841 | Laporte et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150118978 | Khlat | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150163044 | Analui et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150236390 | Analui et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150236395 | Analui et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150236842 | Goel et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160050031 | Hwang et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160134325 | Tageman et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160204821 | Han et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160211870 | Wu et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160379744 | Vaesen | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160380706 | Tanzi et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170030339 | Proudfoot | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170070368 | Mandegaran | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20180309464 | Mandegaran | Oct 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2783638 | May 2006 | CN |
101606332 | Dec 2009 | CN |
102012107877 | Feb 2014 | DE |
1091497 | Apr 2001 | EP |
2733855 | May 2014 | EP |
2814172 | Dec 2014 | EP |
2960981 | Dec 2015 | EP |
2012089995 | May 2012 | JP |
2012095058 | May 2012 | JP |
10-2010-0134324 | Dec 2010 | KR |
9515018 | Jun 1995 | WO |
0052841 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2014032883 | Mar 2014 | WO |
2014133625 | Sep 2014 | WO |
2015089091 | Jun 2015 | WO |
2016063108 | Apr 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
EESR for European Appl. No. 13876497.2, dated Jul. 4, 2016. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/626,572, dated Jul. 15, 2016. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/622,627, dated May 20, 2016. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/626,572, dated Mar. 31, 2016. |
ISR for Application No. PCT/US2016/050466, dated Nov. 29, 2016. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/626,572, dated Jul. 29, 2015. |
ISR and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/016642, dated Jun. 25, 2015. |
Hunter et al., “Passive Microwave Receive Filter Networks Using Low-Q Resonators,” IEEE Microwave Magazine, pp. 46-53, (2005). |
Laforge et al., “Diplexer design implementing highly miniaturized multilayer superconducting hybrids and filters,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superonductivity, pp. 47-54, (2009). |
Marcatili et al., “Band-Splitting Filter,” Bell System Technical Journal, pp. 197-212, (1961). |
Matthaei et al., “Microwave Filters, Impedance-Matching Networks, and Coupling Structures,” Chapter 14: Directional, Channel-Separation Filters and Traveling-WAve Ring-Resonators, pp. 843-887, Copyright 1980 Artech House, Inc., Dedham, MA; reprint of edition published by McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964. |
Matthaei et al., “Microwave Filters, Impedance-Matching Networks, and Coupling Structures,” Chapter 16: Multiplexer Design, pp. 965-1000, Copyright 1980 Artech House, Inc., Dedham, MA; reprint of edition published by McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964. |
Phudpong et al., “Nonlinear Matched Reflection Mode and stop Filters for Frequency Selective Limiting Applications,” Microwave Symposium Conference, IEEE/MTT-S International, pp. 1043-1046, (2007). |
ISR and Written Opinion for PCT/US2014/069372, dated Mar. 3, 2015. |
ISR and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/016145, dated May 20, 2015. |
ISR and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/015930, dated May 27, 2015. |
Korean International Searching Authority, ISR and Written Opinion for PCT/US2013/074155, dated Sep. 23, 2014. |
Kannangara et al., “Analysis of an Adaptive Wideband Duplexer With Double-Loop Cancellation,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 1761-1982, (2007). |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/102,244, dated Jul. 20, 2016. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/102,244, dated Sep. 22, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/102,244, dated Jun. 15, 2015. |
ISR and Written Opinion for PCT/2016/054646, dated Dec. 29, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/528,876, dated Jul. 3, 2019, 8 pages. |
Notification of the First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201680059896.8, dated Apr. 2, 2019, 11 pages. |
Notification of the Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201580009478.3, dated Jul. 17, 2019, 11 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/624,289, dated Sep. 11, 2019, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/512,550, dated Aug. 27, 2019, 9 pages. |
Notification of the First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 2017900013920, dated Sep. 27, 2019, 5 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/662,864, dated Dec. 9, 2019, 7 pages. |
Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 2016800598968, dated Dec. 23, 2019, 13 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/663,542, dated Jan. 31, 2020, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/074155, dated Jun. 25, 2015, 7 pages. |
International Preliminary Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/069372, dated Jun. 23, 2016, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/015930, dated Aug. 25, 2016, 8 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/016145, dated Aug. 25, 2016, 6 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/016642, dated Sep. 1, 2016, 9 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/54646, dated Oct. 5, 2017, 5 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/052699, dated Apr. 4, 2019, 8 pages. |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal for Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-547473, dated Mar. 2, 2017, 6 pages. |
The First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201480067651.0, dated Jun. 22, 2018, 27 pages. |
The First Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201580009478.3, dated Dec. 27, 2018, 34 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/565,752, dated Nov. 4, 2016, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/622,627, dated Feb. 16, 2017, 7 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/622,627, dated Aug. 14, 2017, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/624,289, dated Nov. 4, 2016, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/624,289, dated Mar. 3, 2017, 17 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/624,289, dated Aug. 10, 2017, 23 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/624,289, dated Mar. 30, 2018, 19 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/624,289, dated Feb. 19, 2019, 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/626,572, dated Jul. 29, 2015, 22 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/626,572, dated Feb. 16, 2017, 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/528,876, dated Nov. 7, 2018, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/528,876, dated Mar. 6, 2019, 9 pages. |
PCT, Notification of Transmittal of the International, Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, in Application No. PCT/US2017/052699, dated Dec. 4, 2017 (14 pages). |
Official Letter for Taiwanese Patent Application No. 105132721, dated Apr. 6, 2020, 16 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180083591 A1 | Mar 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62397727 | Sep 2016 | US |