Patent Grant
10881732
Extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling regulates angiogenesis. However, prior to the invention described herein, the precise mechanisms by which structural changes in ECM proteins contribute to angiogenesis were not fully understood. The role of integrin αvβ3 in angiogenesis is complex, as evidence exists for both positive and negative functions. As such, prior to the invention described herein, there was a pressing need to develop an understanding of the role of integrin αvβ3 in angiogenesis.
The invention is based, in part, upon the surprising discovery that an antagonist (i.e., Mab XL313) specifically directed to a cryptic RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO.1)-containing collagen epitope significantly enhanced the anti-tumor efficacy of an antibody that targets the immune checkpoint regulatory protein, PDL-1. Additionally, the invention is based, in part, on an antagonist of integrin αvβ3 that is used to enhance the therapeutic activity of an immune checkpoint inhibitor, e.g., cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed death ligand-1 (PDL-1), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (Lag3), leukocyte-associated immunoglobulin-like receptor 1 (LAIR1) and/or leukocyte-associated immunoglobulin-like receptor 2 (LAIR2) antibodies.
The present invention features compositions and methods for treating cancer and diseases characterized by abnormal immune suppression. For example, methods of treating cancer in a subject are carried out by identifying a subject, e.g., a human subject, that has been diagnosed with cancer; administering an immune checkpoint inhibitor; and administering an antagonist of collagen or a fragment thereof, thereby treating cancer in the subject. In some cases, the immune checkpoint inhibitor comprises an inhibitor of CTLA-4, PDL-1, PD-1, CTLA-4, Lag3, LAIR1 and/or LAIR2. For example, the inhibitor of PDL-1 comprises a PDL-1 antibody.
Suitable types of collagen include collagen type-I, collagen type-II, collagen type-III and collagen type-IV (e.g., the alpha 6 chain of collagen type-IV). In some cases, the antagonist of collagen or a fragment thereof comprises an antagonist of the XL313 cryptic collagen epitope. For example, the antagonist comprises an antibody that binds a cryptic RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) containing collagen epitope. Preferably, the antibody comprises a monoclonal antibody, e.g., an XL313 monoclonal antibody.
Preferably, the antagonist of collagen or a fragment thereof enhances anti-tumor activity of the immune checkpoint inhibitor and inhibits an inflammatory condition. Exemplary inflammatory conditions include dermatitis, pneumonitis, or colitis.
The methods described herein can be used in conjunction with one or more chemotherapeutic or anti-neoplastic agents. In some cases, the additional chemotherapeutic agent is radiotherapy. In some cases, the chemotherapeutic agent is a cell death-inducing agent.
The term “antineoplastic agent” is used herein to refer to agents that have the functional property of inhibiting a development or progression of a neoplasm in a human, particularly a malignant (cancerous) lesion, such as a carcinoma, sarcoma, lymphoma, or leukemia. Inhibition of metastasis is frequently a property of antineoplastic agents.
Exemplary cancers are selected from the group comprising of melanoma, central nervous system (CNS) cancer, CNS germ cell tumor, lung cancer, leukemia, multiple myeloma, renal cancer, malignant glioma, medulloblatoma, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, fibrosarcoma, pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer, head and neck cancer, colorectal cancer. For example, a cancer cell is derived from a solid cancer or hematological cancer. The hematological cancer is, e.g., a leukemia or a lymphoma. A leukemia is acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), or acute monocytic leukemia (AMoL). A lymphoma is follicular lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma (e.g., Nodular sclerosing subtype, mixed-cellularity subtype, lymphocyte-rich subtype, or lymphocyte depleted subtype), or Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Exemplary solid cancers include but are not limited to melanoma (e.g., unresectable, metastatic melanoma), renal cancer (e.g., renal cell carcinoma), prostate cancer (e.g., metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer), ovarian cancer (e.g., epithelial ovarian cancer, such as metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer), breast cancer (e.g., triple negative breast cancer), and lung cancer (e.g., non-small cell lung cancer).
Human dosage amounts can initially be determined by extrapolating from the amount of compound used in mice or nonhuman primates, as a skilled artisan recognizes it is routine in the art to modify the dosage for humans compared to animal models. In certain embodiments, it is envisioned that the dosage of the antagonist to collagen may vary from between about 0.1 μg compound/kg body weight to about 25000 μg compound/kg body weight; or from about 1 μg/kg body weight to about 4000 μg/kg body weight or from about 10 μg/kg body weight to about 3000 μg/kg body weight. In other embodiments this dose may be about 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 600, 650, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, 1000, 1050, 1100, 1150, 1200, 1250, 1300, 1350, 1400, 1450, 1500, 1600, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2000, 2500, 3000, 3500, 4000, 4500, 5000, 5500, 6000, 6500, 7000, 7500, 8000, 8500, 9000, 9500, 10000, 10500, 1100, 11500, 12000, 12500, 13000, 13500, 14000, 14500, 15000, 15500, 16000, 16500, 17000, 17500, 18000, 18500, 19000, 19500, 20000, 20500, 21000, 21500, 22000, 22500, 23000, 23500, 24000, 24500, or 25000 μg/kg body weight. In other embodiments, it is envisaged that doses may be in the range of about 0.5 μg compound/kg body weight to about 20 μg compound/kg body weight. In other embodiments, the doses may be about 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 10, or 20 mg/kg body weight. Of course, this dosage amount may be adjusted upward or downward, as is routinely done in such treatment protocols, depending on the results of the initial clinical trials and the needs of a particular patient.
In some cases, the immune checkpoint inhibitor, e.g., the inhibitor of PDL-1, is administered at a dosage of 0.01-10 mg/kg (e.g., 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, or 10 mg/kg) bodyweight. For example, the PDL-1 inhibitor is administered in an amount of 0.01-30 mg (e.g., 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 20, or 30 mg) per dose. In another example, the immune checkpoint inhibitor, e.g., the anti-PD-L1 antibody, is administered in the dose range of 0.1 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg of body weight. In some cases, the XL313 antibody is administered at a dosage of 0.01-10 mg/kg (e.g., 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, or 10 mg/kg) bodyweight. For example, the XL313 antibody is administered in an amount of 0.01-30 mg (e.g., 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 20, or 30 mg) per dose. For example, the dose range of Mab X1313 is from 0.1 mg/kg to 25 mg/kg of body weight.
The compositions of the invention (e.g., inhibitor of PDL-1 and XL313 antibody) are administered once per month, twice per month (i.e., every two weeks), every week, once per day, twice per day, every 12 hours, every 8 hours, every 4 hours, every 2 hours or every hour. The compositions of the invention (e.g., inhibitor of PDL-1 and XL313 antibody) are administered for a duration of 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 4 days, 5 days, 6 days, 7 days, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, five weeks, six weeks, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, 5 months, 6 months, 7 months, 8 months, 9 months, 10 months, 11 months, 12 months, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years or more. For example, the composition of the invention (e.g., inhibitor of PD-L1 and XL313 antibody) are administered one dose every two weeks for 4 to 6 weeks or until the disease is treated.
Also provided is a method of treating a disease characterized by abnormal immune suppression in a subject by identifying a subject, e.g., a human, that has been diagnosed with a disease characterized by abnormal immune suppression, administering an immune checkpoint inhibitor, and administering an antagonist of an integrin, thereby treating in the subject.
Suitable immune checkpoint inhibitors comprise an inhibitor of CTLA-4, PD-1, PDL-1, Lag3, LAIR1, or LAIR 2. For example, the immune checkpoint inhibitor comprises a CTLA-4 antibody, a PD-1 antibody, a PDL-1 antibody, a Lag3 antibody, a LAIR1 antibody, or a LAIR 2 antibody.
Preferably, the integrin comprises integrin αvβ3. For example, the antagonist of integrin αvβ3 comprises an antibody targeting αvβ3 binding RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO: 1) containing collagen epitope.
The methods described herein can be used in conjunction with one or more chemotherapeutic or anti-neoplastic agents. In some cases, the additional chemotherapeutic agent is radiotherapy. In some cases, the chemotherapeutic agent is a cell death-inducing agent.
Suitable diseases characterized by abnormal immune suppression include Type I diabetes, lupus, psoriasis, scleroderma, hemolytic anemia, vasculitis, Graves' disease, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, Myasthenia gravis, and vasculitis
In some cases, the immune checkpoint inhibitor (e.g., CTLA-4 antibody, a PD-1 antibody, a PDL-1 antibody, Lag3, LAIR1, or LAIR 2) is administered at a dosage of 0.01-10 mg/kg (e.g., 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, or 10 mg/kg) bodyweight. For example, the PDL-1 inhibitor is administered in an amount of 0.01-30 mg (e.g., 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 20, or 30 mg) per dose. In another example, the antibody is administered in the dose range of 0.1 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg of body weight. In some cases, the antagonist of integrin αvβ3 is administered at a dosage of 0.01-10 mg/kg (e.g., 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, or 10 mg/kg) bodyweight. In some cases, the XL313 antibody is administered in an amount of 0.01-30 mg (e.g., 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 20, or 30 mg) per dose.
The compositions of the invention (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitor and antagonist of integrin αvβ3) are administered once per month, twice per month (once every two weeks), once a week, once per day, twice per day, every 12 hours, every 8 hours, every 4 hours, every 2 hours or every hour. The compositions of the invention (e.g., inhibitor of PDL-1 and XL313 antibody) are administered for a duration of 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 4 days, 5 days, 6 days, 7 days, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 2 months, 3 months, 4 months, 5 months, 6 months, 7 months, 8 months, 9 months, 10 months, 11 months, 12 months, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years or more. The composition of the invention (e.g., inhibitor of PDL-1 and XL313 antibody) are administered one dose every two weeks for 4 to 6 weeks or until the disease is treated
Also provided is a method of treating a disease characterized by an overactive immune response (e.g., an autoimmune disease) in a subject, e.g., a human subject, that has been diagnosed with an overactive immune response by administering a peptide comprising collagen or a fragment thereof, thereby treating overactive immune response in the subject. Suitable types of collagen include collagen type-I, collagen type II, collagen type III, and collagen type-IV (e.g., the alpha 6 chain of collagen type-IV). For example, the peptide comprises RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1).
In some cases, the autoimmune disease comprises Graves' disease, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, Systemic lupus erythematosus (lupus), Type 1 diabetes, multiple sclerosis or rheumatoid arthritis.
Methods for healing a wound in a subject, e.g., a human subject with a wound, are carried out by administering a peptide comprising collagen or a fragment thereof to the wound of the subject, thereby healing a wound in the subject. For example, the peptide is administered to a site that is about 0.1 mm, 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 2.5 mm, 5 mm, 10 mm, 15 mm, 20 mm, or 40 mm away from a perimeter or margin of the wound. Alternatively, the peptide is administered directly to the wound itself.
Suitable types of collagen include collagen type-I, collagen type II, collagen type III, and collagen type-IV (e.g., the alpha 6 chain of collagen type-IV). For example, the peptide comprises RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1).
Definitions
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the meaning commonly understood by a person skilled in the art to which this invention belongs. The following references provide one of skill with a general definition of many of the terms used in this invention: Singleton et al., Dictionary of Microbiology and Molecular Biology (2nd ed. 1994); The Cambridge Dictionary of Science and Technology (Walker ed., 1988); The Glossary of Genetics, 5th Ed., R. Rieger et al. (eds.), Springer Verlag (1991); and Hale & Marham, The Harper Collins Dictionary of Biology (1991). As used herein, the following terms have the meanings ascribed to them below, unless specified otherwise.
By “agent” is meant any small molecule chemical compound, antibody, nucleic acid molecule, or polypeptide, or fragments thereof.
By “antibody” is meant any immunoglobulin polypeptide, or fragment thereof, having immunogen binding ability. As used herein, the term “antibodies” includes polyclonal antibodies, affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies, monoclonal antibodies, and antigen-binding fragments, such as F(ab′)2 and Fab proteolytic fragments. Genetically engineered intact antibodies or fragments, such as chimeric antibodies, Fv fragments, single chain antibodies, and the like, as well as synthetic antigen-binding peptides and polypeptides, are also included. Non-human antibodies may be humanized by grafting non-human CDRs onto human framework and constant regions, or by incorporating the entire non-human variable domains. In certain preferred embodiments, humanized antibodies may retain non-human residues within the human variable region framework domains to enhance proper binding characteristics.
“Antigenic fragment” and the like are understood as at least that portion of a peptide capable of inducing an immune response in a subject, or being able to be specifically bound by an antibody raised against the antigenic fragment. Typically, antigenic fragments are at least 7 amino acids in length. Antigenic fragments can include deletions of the amino acid sequence from the N-terminus or the C-terminus, or both. For example, an antigenic fragment can have an N- and/or a C-terminal deletion of about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, 170, 180, 190, 200, or more amino acids. Antigenic fragments can also include one or more internal deletions of the same exemplary lengths. Antigenic fragments can also include one or more point mutations, particularly conservative point mutations. At least an antigenic fragment of protein can include the full length, wild-type sequence of the antigen. An antigenic fragment can include more than one potential antibody binding site. An antigenic fragment can be used to make antibodies for use in any of the methods provided herein.
By “autoimmune disease” is meant a disease characterized by a dysfunction in the immune system. The disease is characterized by the components of the immune system affected, whether the immune system is overactive or underactive, or whether the condition is congenital or acquired. In most cases, the disorder causes abnormally low activity or over activity of the immune system. In cases of immune system over activity, the body attacks and damages its own tissues (autoimmune). Immune deficiency diseases decrease the body's ability to fight invaders, causing vulnerability to infections. In response to an unknown trigger, the immune system may begin producing antibodies that instead of fighting infections, attack the body's own tissues. Treatment for autoimmune diseases generally focuses on reducing immune system activity.
By “blood vessel formation” is meant the dynamic process that includes one or more steps of blood vessel development and/or maturation, such as angiogenesis, arteriogenesis, vasculogenesis, formation of an immature blood vessel network, blood vessel remodeling, blood vessel stabilization, blood vessel maturation, blood vessel differentiation, or establishment of a functional blood vessel network.
By “blood vessel remodeling” or “vascular remodeling” is meant the dynamic process of blood vessel enlargement in shape and size to maintain the luminal orifice and blood flow. For example, vascular remodeling includes change in arterial size to adapt to plaque accumulation, effectively maintaining the lumen and blood flow to the myocardium.
As used herein, “binding” or “specific binding” is understood as having at least a 103 or more, preferably 104 or more, preferably 105 or more, preferably 106 or more preference for binding to a specific binding partner as compared to a non-specific binding partner (e.g., binding an antigen to a sample known to contain the cognate antibody).
By “cancer” is meant, comprising of but not limited to melanoma, central nervous system (CNS) cancer, CNS germ cell tumor, lung cancer, leukemia, multiple myeloma, renal cancer, malignant glioma, medulloblatoma, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, fibrosarcoma, pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer, head and neck cancer, colorectal cancer. For example, a cancer cell is derived from a solid cancer or hematological cancer. The hematological cancer is, e.g., a leukemia or a lymphoma. A leukemia is acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), or acute monocytic leukemia (AMoL). A lymphoma is follicular lymphoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma (e.g., Nodular sclerosing subtype, mixed-cellularity subtype, lymphocyte-rich subtype, or lymphocyte depleted subtype), or Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Exemplary solid cancers include but are not limited to melanoma (e.g., unresectable, metastatic melanoma), renal cancer (e.g., renal cell carcinoma), prostate cancer (e.g., metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer), ovarian cancer (e.g., epithelial ovarian cancer, such as metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer), breast cancer (e.g., triple negative breast cancer), and lung cancer (e.g., non-small cell lung cancer).
By “control” or “reference” is meant a standard of comparison. As used herein, “changed as compared to a control” sample or subject is understood as having a level of the analyte or diagnostic or therapeutic indicator to be detected at a level that is statistically different than a sample from a normal, untreated, or control sample. Control samples include, for example, cells in culture, one or more laboratory test animals, or one or more human subjects. Methods to select and test control samples are within the ability of those in the art. An analyte can be a naturally occurring substance that is characteristically expressed or produced by the cell or organism (e.g., an antibody, a protein) or a substance produced by a reporter construct (e.g, β-galactosidase or luciferase). Depending on the method used for detection the amount and measurement of the change can vary. Determination of statistical significance is within the ability of those skilled in the art, e.g., the number of standard deviations from the mean that constitute a positive result.
By “cryptic” is meant that a motif may be inaccessible to cell surface receptors, and once the target protein is proteolyzed or denatured, a sequence becomes exposed or generates a fragment that is then recognized by the antibody. For example, the XL313 epitope, i.e., RGDKGE core sequence within collagen type-I is cryptic in that the antibody does not react with normal collagen in its triple helical state, but once it is proteolyzed or denatured, the sequence becomes exposed or generates a fragment of collagen that is recognized by MabXL313.
As used herein, “detecting”, “detection” and the like are understood that an assay performed for identification of a specific analyte in a sample, e.g., an antigen in a sample or the level of an antigen in a sample. The amount of analyte or activity detected in the sample can be none or below the level of detection of the assay or method.
By “diagnosing” and the like as used herein refers to a clinical or other assessment of the condition of a subject based on observation, testing, or circumstances for identifying a subject having a disease, disorder, or condition based on the presence of at least one indicator, such as a sign or symptom of the disease, disorder, or condition. Typically, diagnosing using the method of the invention includes the observation of the subject for multiple indicators of the disease, disorder, or condition in conjunction with the methods provided herein. Diagnostic methods provide an indicator that a disease is or is not present. A single diagnostic test typically does not provide a definitive conclusion regarding the disease state of the subject being tested.
By the terms “effective amount” and “therapeutically effective amount” of a formulation or formulation component is meant a sufficient amount of the formulation or component, alone or in a combination, to provide the desired effect. For example, by “an effective amount” is meant an amount of a compound, alone or in a combination, required to ameliorate the symptoms of a disease relative to an untreated patient. The effective amount of active compound(s) used to practice the present invention for therapeutic treatment of a disease varies depending upon the manner of administration, the age, body weight, and general health of the subject. Ultimately, the attending physician or veterinarian will decide the appropriate amount and dosage regimen. Such amount is referred to as an “effective” amount.
The term “polynucleotide” or “nucleic acid” as used herein designates mRNA, RNA, cRNA, cDNA or DNA. As used herein, a “nucleic acid encoding a polypeptide” is understood as any possible nucleic acid that upon (transcription and) translation would result in a polypeptide of the desired sequence. The degeneracy of the nucleic acid code is well understood. Further, it is well known that various organisms have preferred codon usage, etc. Determination of a nucleic acid sequence to encode any polypeptide is well within the ability of those of skill in the art.
As used herein, “immunoassay” is understood as any antibody base detection method including, but not limited to enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), radioimmune assay (RIA), Western blot, immunohistochemistry, immunoprecipitation assay such as Luciferase Immunoprecipitation System (LIPS see, e.g., US Patent Publication 2007/0259336 which is incorporated herein by reference). In a preferred embodiment, the immunoassay is a quantitative. Antibodies for use in immunoassays include any monoclonal or polyclonal antibody appropriate for use in the specific immunoassay.
By “inhibitory nucleic acid molecule” is meant a polynucleotide that disrupts the expression of a target nucleic acid molecule or an encoded polypeptide. Exemplary inhibitory nucleic acid molecules include, but are not limited to, shRNAs, siRNAs, antisense nucleic acid molecules, and analogs thereof.
As used herein, “isolated” or “purified” when used in reference to a polypeptide means that a naturally polypeptide or protein has been removed from its normal physiological environment (e.g., protein isolated from plasma or tissue, optionally bound to another protein) or is synthesized in a non-natural environment (e.g., artificially synthesized in an in vitro translation system or using chemical synthesis). Thus, an “isolated” or “purified” polypeptide can be in a cell-free solution or placed in a different cellular environment (e.g., expressed in a heterologous cell type). The term “purified” does not imply that the polypeptide is the only polypeptide present, but that it is essentially free (about 90-95%, up to 99-100% pure) of cellular or organismal material naturally associated with it, and thus is distinguished from naturally occurring polypeptide. Similarly, an isolated nucleic acid is removed from its normal physiological environment. “Isolated” when used in reference to a cell means the cell is in culture (i.e., not in an animal), either cell culture or organ culture, of a primary cell or cell line. Cells can be isolated from a normal animal, a transgenic animal, an animal having spontaneously occurring genetic changes, and/or an animal having a genetic and/or induced disease or condition. An isolated virus or viral vector is a virus that is removed from the cells, typically in culture, in which the virus was produced.
As used herein, “kits” are understood to contain at least one non-standard laboratory reagent for use in the methods of the invention in appropriate packaging, optionally containing instructions for use. The kit can further include any other components required to practice the method of the invention, as dry powders, concentrated solutions, or ready to use solutions. In some embodiments, the kit comprises one or more containers that contain reagents for use in the methods of the invention; such containers can be boxes, ampules, bottles, vials, tubes, bags, pouches, blister-packs, or other suitable container forms known in the art. Such containers can be made of plastic, glass, laminated paper, metal foil, or other materials suitable for holding reagents.
As used herein, “obtaining” is understood herein as manufacturing, purchasing, or otherwise coming into possession of.
The phrase “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” is art recognized and includes a pharmaceutically acceptable material, composition or vehicle, suitable for administering compounds of the present invention to mammals. The carriers include liquid or solid filler, diluent, excipient, solvent or encapsulating material, involved in carrying or transporting the subject agent from one organ, or portion of the body, to another organ, or portion of the body. Each carrier must be “acceptable” in the sense of being compatible with the other ingredients of the formulation and not injurious to the patient. Some examples of materials which can serve as pharmaceutically acceptable carriers include: sugars, such as lactose, glucose and sucrose; starches, such as corn starch and potato starch; cellulose, and its derivatives, such as sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose and cellulose acetate; powdered tragacanth; malt; gelatin; talc; excipients, such as cocoa butter and suppository waxes; oils, such as peanut oil, cottonseed oil, safflower oil, sesame oil, olive oil, corn oil and soybean oil; glycols, such as propylene glycol; polyols, such as glycerin, sorbitol, mannitol and polyethylene glycol; esters, such as ethyl oleate and ethyl laurate; agar; buffering agents, such as magnesium hydroxide and aluminum hydroxide; alginic acid; pyrogen-free water; isotonic saline; Ringer's solution; ethyl alcohol; phosphate buffer solutions; and other non-toxic compatible substances employed in pharmaceutical formulations.
Formulations of the present invention include those suitable for oral, nasal, topical, transdermal, buccal, sublingual, intramuscular, intracardiac, intraperotineal, intrathecal, intracranial, rectal, vaginal and/or parenteral administration. The formulations may conveniently be presented in unit dosage form and may be prepared by any methods well known in the art of pharmacy. The amount of active ingredient that can be combined with a carrier material to produce a single dosage form will generally be that amount of the compound that produces a therapeutic effect.
In some cases, a composition of the invention is administered orally or systemically. Other modes of administration include rectal, topical, intraocular, buccal, intravaginal, intracisternal, intracerebroventricular, intratracheal, nasal, transdermal, within/on implants, or parenteral routes. The term “parenteral” includes subcutaneous, intrathecal, intravenous, intramuscular, intraperitoneal, or infusion. Intravenous or intramuscular routes are not particularly suitable for long-term therapy and prophylaxis. They could, however, be preferred in emergency situations. Compositions comprising a composition of the invention can be added to a physiological fluid, such as blood. Oral administration can be preferred for prophylactic treatment because of the convenience to the patient as well as the dosing schedule. Parenteral modalities (subcutaneous or intravenous) may be preferable for more acute illness, or for therapy in patients that are unable to tolerate enteral administration due to gastrointestinal intolerance, ileus, or other concomitants of critical illness. Inhaled therapy may be most appropriate for pulmonary vascular diseases (e.g., pulmonary hypertension).
As used herein, the terms “prevent,” “preventing,” “prevention,” “prophylactic treatment” and the like refer to reducing the probability of developing a disorder or condition in a subject, who does not have, but is at risk of or susceptible to developing a disorder or condition.
As used herein, “plurality” is understood to mean more than one. For example, a plurality refers to at least two, three, four, five, or more.
A “polypeptide” or “peptide” as used herein is understood as two or more independently selected natural or non-natural amino acids joined by a covalent bond (e.g., a peptide bond). A peptide can include 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, or more natural or non-natural amino acids joined by peptide bonds. Polypeptides as described herein include full length proteins (e.g., fully processed proteins) as well as shorter amino acids sequences (e.g., fragments of naturally occurring proteins or synthetic polypeptide fragments). Optionally the peptide further includes one or more modifications such as modified peptide bonds, i.e., peptide isosteres, and may contain amino acids other than the 20 gene-encoded amino acids. The polypeptides may be modified by either natural processes, such as posttranslational processing, or by chemical modification techniques which are well known in the art. Such modifications are well described in basic texts and in more detailed monographs, as well as in a voluminous research literature. Modifications can occur anywhere in a polypeptide, including the peptide backbone, the amino acid side-chains and the amino or carboxyl termini. It will be appreciated that the same type of modification may be present in the same or varying degrees at several sites in a given polypeptide. Also, a given polypeptide may contain many types of modifications. Polypeptides may be branched, for example, as a result of ubiquitination, and they may be cyclic, with or without branching. Cyclic, branched, and branched cyclic polypeptides may result from posttranslation natural processes or may be made by synthetic methods. Modifications include acetylation, acylation, ADP-ribosylation, amidation, covalent attachment of flavin, covalent attachment of a heme moiety, covalent attachment of a nucleotide or nucleotide derivative, covalent attachment of a lipid or lipid derivative, covalent attachment of phosphotidylinositol, cross-linking, cyclization, disulfide bond formation, demethylation, formation of covalent cross-links, formation of cysteine, formation of pyroglutamate, formulation, gamma-carboxylation, glycosylation, GPI anchor formation, hydroxylation, iodination, methylation, myristoylation, oxidation, pegylation, proteolytic processing, phosphorylation, prenylation, racemization, selenoylation, sulfation, transfer-RNA mediated addition of amino acids to proteins such as arginylation, and ubiquitination. (See, for instance, Proteins, Structure and Molecular Properties, 2nd ed., T. E. Creighton, W.H. Freeman and Company, New York (1993); Posttranslational Covalent Modification of Proteins, B. C. Johnson, ed., Academic Press, New York, pgs. 1-12 (1983); Seifter et al., Meth. Enzymol 182:626-646 (1990); Rattan et al., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 663:48-62 (1992)).
The term “reduce” or “increase” is meant to alter negatively or positively, respectively, by at least 5%. An alteration may be by 5%, 10%, 25%, 30%, 50%, 75%, or even by 100%.
As used herein, a “reporter protein” or a “reporter polypeptide” is understood as a polypeptide that can be readily detected, preferably quantitatively detected, either directly or indirectly. A reporter polypeptide typically has an enzymatic activity, luciferase activity, alkaline phosphatase activity, beta-galactosidase activity, acetyl transferase activity, etc. wherein catalysis of a reaction with the substrate by the enzyme results in the production of a product, e.g., light, a product that can be detected at a specific wavelength of light, radioactivity, such that the amount of the reporter peptide can be determined in the sample, either as a relative amount, or as an absolute amount by comparison to control samples.
A “sample” as used herein refers to a biological material that is isolated from its environment (e.g., blood or tissue from an animal, cells, or conditioned media from tissue culture) and is suspected of containing, or known to contain an analyte, such as a protein. A sample can also be a partially purified fraction of a tissue or bodily fluid. A reference sample can be a “normal” sample, from a donor not having the disease or condition fluid, or from a normal tissue in a subject having the disease or condition. A reference sample can also be from an untreated donor or cell culture not treated with an active agent (e.g., no treatment or administration of vehicle only). A reference sample can also be taken at a “zero time point” prior to contacting the cell or subject with the agent or therapeutic intervention to be tested or at the start of a prospective study.
“Sensitivity and specificity” are statistical measures of the performance of a binary classification test. The sensitivity (also called recall rate in some fields) measures the proportion of actual positives which are correctly identified as such (e.g. the percentage of sick people who are identified as having the condition); and the specificity measures the proportion of negatives which are correctly identified (e.g. the percentage of well people who are identified as not having the condition). They are closely related to the concepts of type I and type II errors. A theoretical, optimal prediction can achieve 100% sensitivity (i.e. predict all people from the sick group as sick) and 100% specificity (i.e. not predict anyone from the healthy group as sick).
The concepts are expressed mathematically as follows:
sensitivity=#true positives/#true positives+#false negatives
specificity=#true negatives/#true negatives+#false positives.
By “selectively” is meant the ability to affect the activity or expression of a target molecule without affecting the activity or expression of a non-target molecule.
By “substantially identical” is meant a polypeptide or nucleic acid molecule exhibiting at least 50% identity to a reference amino acid sequence (for example, any one of the amino acid sequences described herein) or nucleic acid sequence (for example, any one of the nucleic acid sequences described herein). Preferably, such a sequence is at least 60%, more preferably 80% or 85%, and more preferably 90%, 95% or even 99% identical at the amino acid level or nucleic acid to the sequence used for comparison.
Sequence identity is typically measured using sequence analysis software (for example, Sequence Analysis Software Package of the Genetics Computer Group, University of Wisconsin Biotechnology Center, 1710 University Avenue, Madison, Wis. 53705, BLAST, BESTFIT, GAP, or PILEUP/PRETTYBOX programs). Such software matches identical or similar sequences by assigning degrees of homology to various substitutions, deletions, and/or other modifications. Conservative substitutions typically include substitutions within the following groups: glycine, alanine; valine, isoleucine, leucine; aspartic acid, glutamic acid, asparagine, glutamine; serine, threonine; lysine, arginine; and phenylalanine, tyrosine. In an exemplary approach to determining the degree of identity, a BLAST program may be used, with a probability score between e−3 and e−100 indicating a closely related sequence.
A “subject” as used herein refers to an organism. In certain embodiments, the organism is an animal. In certain embodiments, the subject is a living organism. In certain embodiments, the subject is a cadaver organism. In certain preferred embodiments, the subject is a mammal, including, but not limited to, a human or non-human mammal. In certain embodiments, the subject is a domesticated mammal or a primate including a non-human primate. Examples of subjects include humans, monkeys, dogs, cats, mice, rats, cows, horses, goats, and sheep. A human subject may also be referred to as a patient.
A “subject sample” can be a sample obtained from any subject, typically a blood or serum sample, however the method contemplates the use of any body fluid or tissue from a subject. The sample may be obtained, for example, for diagnosis of a specific individual for the presence or absence of a particular disease or condition.
A subject “suffering from or suspected of suffering from” a specific disease, condition, or syndrome has a sufficient number of risk factors or presents with a sufficient number or combination of signs or symptoms of the disease, condition, or syndrome such that a competent individual would diagnose or suspect that the subject was suffering from the disease, condition, or syndrome. Methods for identification of subjects suffering from or suspected of suffering from conditions associated with diminished cardiac function is within the ability of those in the art. Subjects suffering from, and suspected of suffering from, a specific disease, condition, or syndrome are not necessarily two distinct groups.
As used herein, “susceptible to” or “prone to” or “predisposed to” a specific disease or condition and the like refers to an individual who based on genetic, environmental, health, and/or other risk factors is more likely to develop a disease or condition than the general population. An increase in likelihood of developing a disease may be an increase of about 10%, 20%, 50%, 100%, 150%, 200%, or more.
As used herein, the terms “treat,” treating,” “treatment,” and the like refer to reducing or ameliorating a disorder and/or symptoms associated therewith. It will be appreciated that, although not precluded, treating a disorder or condition does not require that the disorder, condition or symptoms associated therewith be completely eliminated.
Unless specifically stated or obvious from context, as used herein, the term “or” is understood to be inclusive.
Unless specifically stated or obvious from context, as used herein, the terms “a”, “an”, and “the” are understood to be singular or plural.
Unless specifically stated or obvious from context, as used herein, the term “about” is understood as within a range of normal tolerance in the art, for example within 2 standard deviations of the mean. About can be understood as within 10%, 9%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.1%, 0.05%, or 0.01% of the stated value. Unless otherwise clear from context, all numerical values provided herein can be modified by the term about.
The recitation of a listing of chemical groups in any definition of a variable herein includes definitions of that variable as any single group or combination of listed groups. The recitation of an embodiment for a variable or aspect herein includes that embodiment as any single embodiment or in combination with any other embodiments or portions thereof.
Any compositions or methods provided herein can be combined with one or more of any of the other compositions and methods provided herein.
Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments thereof, and from the claims. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, suitable methods and materials are described below. All published foreign patents and patent applications cited herein are incorporated herein by reference. Genbank and NCBI submissions indicated by accession number cited herein are incorporated herein by reference. All other published references, documents, manuscripts and scientific literature cited herein are incorporated herein by reference. In the case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
Described herein is an RGD containing cryptic collagen epitope that is generated in vivo. As described in detail below, rather than inhibiting αvβ3 signaling, this collagen epitope promoted αvβ3 activation and stimulated angiogenesis and inflammation. Additionally, an antagonist of integrin αvβ3 that inhibits signaling from this receptor was used to enhance the therapeutic activity of PD-1/PDL-1 targeting drugs for the treatment of cancer and other diseases characterized by abnormal immune response.
Also described herein is an endothelial cell mechano-signaling pathway in which a cryptic collagen epitope activates αvβ3 leading to a Src and P38MAPK-dependent cascade that leads to nuclear accumulation of YAP and stimulation of endothelial cell growth is defined. Collectively, the findings provide evidence for a mechano-signaling pathway, but also define a potential therapeutic strategy to control αvβ3 signaling by targeting a pro-angiogenic and inflammatory ligand of αvβ3 rather than the receptor itself.
Angiogenesis, the process by which new blood vessels form from pre-existing vessels plays a critical role in normal and pathological events. Efforts are underway to more precisely define the interconnected mechanisms that control this crucial biological process in order to develop more effective strategies to control neovascular diseases (1, 2). Significant advances have been made in identifying molecular regulators of angiogenesis and their associated signaling pathways (3-5). A more precise understanding of angiogenic signaling pathways and the networks of regulatory feedback loops operating within distinct cellular compartments has provided important clues to help explain the modest clinical impact of many anti-angiogenic strategies (1-5). For example, while vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) induces pro-angiogenic signaling leading to enhanced endothelial cell migration, growth, and survival, VEGF-induced blood vessels are often characterized as immature, unstable, and leaky and can regress in the absence of additional signaling events (6). VEGF stimulation under specific circumstances may lead to inhibition of angiogenesis in the context of altered PDGF signaling do to disruption of pericyte recruitment (6). These unexpected findings provide evidence of a negative role for the VEGF/VEGFR signaling during new vessel development (6). Similarly, studies have provided evidence for both a positive and a negative role for integrin αvβ3 in angiogenesis (7-9).
A wide array of alterations in the composition and biomechanical properties of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins are known to occur during angiogenesis and studies are beginning to define how these changes contribute to new blood vessel development (18,21-23,51-53). Among the key cell surface molecules that play roles in mechano-transduction to facilitate information flow from outside the cell to the inside are integrin receptors. Integrins may act like information hubs by sensing diverse extracellular inputs and relaying this information into a complex network of intracellular circuits that ultimately modulate cellular behavior (4). The precise molecular mechanisms by which cells fine-tune their response to changes within the stromal microenvironment are not completely understood. Further complicating the understanding of new vessel development is the expanding number of cell types that contribute to tissue specific control of angiogenesis such as distinct subsets of stromal fibroblasts, progenitor cells and a variety of inflammatory cells such as neutrophils, mast cells and macrophages. The roles played by these diverse cells during angiogenesis range from secretion of cytokines, chemokines and proteolytic enzymes to the differential expression of other pro and anti-angiogenic factors. Thus, tight control mechanisms must operate to allow coordination between these diverse compartments to govern tissue specific vascular responses.
Integrins are molecules with the ability to detect compositional and structural changes within the ECM and integrate this information into a network of signaling circuits that coordinate context dependent cell behavior. Among the most well studied integrins known to play a role in angiogenesis is αvβ3. The complexity by which αvβ3 regulates angiogenesis is illustrated by the fact that this receptor may exhibit both pro and anti-angiogenic functions (7-15). It is indicated that the distinct biological responses stimulated by binding to αvβ3 may depend on many factors including the mechanical and biochemical features of the particular ligands, the cell types within which αvβ3 is expressed as well as the concentration and manner by which the ligands are presented to the receptor (7-9,24-27). For example, studies indicate that αvβ3 binding to specific NC1 domains of collagen or selected RGD peptides can induce apoptosis, induce arteriole contraction and inhibit angiogenesis (19,29,54) while other αvβ3 ligands may promote cell survival, induce vascular dilation and support angiogenesis (21-23,30,55). These observations are consistent with the notion that the final outcome of αvβ3-mediated signaling may depend to a large extent on the particular characteristics of the ligand. While a wealth of data has shown that RGD peptides can inhibit angiogenesis when administered exogenously, the approach of using a cyclic RGD peptide to control tumor growth failed to significantly impact glioblastoma progression and patient survival in late stage clinical testing (31). Interestingly, studies have indicated that specific RGD peptides may active β3 integrins (56, 57) and under defined experimental conditions induce angiogenesis and tumor growth (30). These findings and other studies suggesting that amino acids C-terminal to the RGD motif play roles in governing integrin selective binding, prompted the examination of the biological significance of naturally occurring RGD containing epitopes on angiogenesis.
For example, multiple pro-angiogenic roles have been proposed for αvβ3 as cyclic arginine-glycineaspartic acid (RGD) containing peptides and antibodies targeting this integrin inhibit angiogenesis in animal models (10-12). In contrast, enhanced angiogenesis was detected in tumors growing in αvβ3 null mice (13). Interestingly, reduced pathological angiogenesis was detected in transgenic mice expressing signaling deficient β3 integrin, which resulted in part from defective recruitment of bone marrow derived cells rather than specific endothelial cell defects (14). Moreover, evidence suggests that β3 integrin may play a more prominent role in the early stages of angiogenesis when new vessels begin to form, as reduction in endothelial cell expression of β3 integrin impaired early stage pathological angiogenesis, but had little effect on later maturation stages once vessels had formed (15). These studies, together with many others suggests αvβ3-mediated regulation of angiogenesis is complex, temporally regulated and is not solely dependent on adhesive events, but also involves downstream signaling, the consequences of which may depend on the cell type and composition of the local extracellular microenvironment (4,9,12,16). Because of the opposing biological responses observed following modulation of some angiogenic regulatory molecules, it is not surprising that anti-angiogenic strategies based on targeting these factors have met with limited clinical success.
Given the importance of integrin-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions in modulating the intensity and specificity of growth factor signaling (1-5, 17, 18), it is important to define how diverse components within the local vascular microenvironment function cooperatively to regulate angiogenesis. Interestingly, distinct αvβ3 ligands may stimulate opposing biological outcomes (7-15). For example, certain NC1 domains of collagen may bind αvβ3 and induce proapoptotic responses while binding of other αvβ3 ligands may promote cell growth and survival (19-22). Given these findings and the complex biological effects observed following direct targeting of αvβ3, an alternative therapeutic approach to control signaling from αvβ3 might involve specific targeting of the pro-angiogenic ligands of αvβ3 rather than directly targeting the receptor itself. Proteolytic remodeling of the ECM can generate integrin binding cryptic epitopes that play functional roles in angiogenesis including the LPG×PG containing HU177 cryptic epitope present in multiple types of collagen and the HUIV26 cryptic epitope, which is present in collagen type-IV (21-23). While the HUIV26 epitope is recognized by αvβ3, it is not specifically composed of an RGD motif (21).
Sequence analysis of RGD sites within collagen type-I indicate that the KGE tri-peptide motif that is C-terminal to the RGD site was highly conserved among diverse species, while considerable variation is observed in the other collagen RGD flanking sequences. While all five of the collagen RGD epitopes can support cell binding, the highly conserved RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) collagen peptide P-2 may play a functional role angiogenesis and inflammation given that Mab XL313 directed to this epitope but not an antibody that recognizes the other three RGD collagen sites inhibited angiogenesis and inflammation in vivo. While the precise difference between the three other naturally occurring non-RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) containing collagen epitopes, one or more of these epitopes were detected in vivo in addition to the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) epitope. Given that these RGD containing epitopes are thought to be largely cryptic and not readily accessible to cell surface receptor, the findings are consistent with active collagen remodeling resulting in generation neoepitopes during new vessel formation.
Because of the importance of RGD sequences in mediating some integrin-dependent interactions and the roles of amino acids flanking the core RGD motif in establishing integrin-binding specificity and affinity (24-27), the ability of RGD motifs within collagen differentially regulate angiogenesis was determined. Sequence analysis of collagen type-I revealed that five different cryptic RGD motifs are present, each with unique flanking sequences. Surprisingly, the C-terminal KGE flanking sequence of one of these RGD motifs is highly conserved in species as diverse as xenopous and man. In contrast, significant sequence and positional variation exists within the other flanking sequences among different species.
ECM remodeling occurs as an early event during angiogenesis and multiple proteolytic enzymes including matrix metalloproteinase (MMPs) as well as serine and cysteine proteases the have the capacity to degrade intact or structurally altered forms of collagen (18,58). While the in vitro studies indicate that MMP-2-mediated degradation of collagen can lead to the generation of low molecular weights fragments recognized by Mab XL313, the precise mechanism by which the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) collagen epitope is generated in vivo is not completely understood. Analysis of angiogenic CAM tissues suggests that a subset of macrophages may be an important source of the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) epitope. Activated macrophages with M2-like characteristics can express multiple enzymes capable of degrading collagen and in turn can internalize and further degrade collagen into small low molecular weight fragments (35,38). While little evidence exist that macrophages generate and deposit intact triple helical collagen type-I, studies have indicated that certain isoforms of collagen may be expressed (59). Consistent with previous reports, intact collagen was detected; however low molecular weight RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) containing collagen fragments in both whole cell lysates and serum free conditioned medium from macrophages like cell lines was detected. While the studies do not rule out macrophage mediated collagen internalization as a contributing factor to the in vivo generation the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) collagen epitope, the in vitro studies were carried out in the absence of serum or exogenously added collagen, and thus are consistent the active generation of the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) collagen fragment by macrophages.
Activated macrophages including M2-polarized macrophages have been implicated in supporting angiogenesis and inflammation as multiple factors secreted by these cells exhibit pro-angiogenic activities (35,60). While many studies indicate that synthetic RGD containing peptides inhibit angiogenesis and tumor growth, the findings provide the first evidence that macrophages may generate and release an RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) containing collagen epitope that may exhibit pro-angiogenic activity. Importantly, previous studies have suggested that certain RGD-peptides can activate αvβ3 (56,57) and may enhance vascular permeability (45,55), which might lead to release of inflammatory factors, which may in turn contribute to the formation of new blood vessels.
To examine possible mechanisms by which the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) collagen peptide might regulate angiogenesis endothelial cell receptors for this motif were identified. While the possibility that additional non-integrin receptors may bind this collagen epitope is not ruled out, the data suggest that αvβ3 can function as an endothelial cell receptor for the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) motif. Interestingly, αvβ3 bound both the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) and RGDAPG (SEQ ID NO. 11) collagen peptides, yet only RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) peptide significantly induced angiogenesis and inflammation in vivo. These findings are consistent with the notion that distinct RGD containing αvβ3 ligands may promote different biological responses. Signaling downstream from αvβ3 is complex and studies have indicated that simple binding of β3 integrin does not necessarily lead to productive outside-in integrin signaling (61). In fact, the capacity of β3 integrins to promote outside-in signaling depends on multiple factors including the extent of receptor clustering and subsequent generation of mechanical tension within the actin cytoskeleton, recruitment of adaptor and accessory proteins such as Ga13, and Kindlin-2 and the association of the integrin with protein tyrosine phosphatases and certain growth factor receptors (62-65). While the exact mechanisms leading to RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1)-mediated αvβ3 signaling is not completely understood, endothelial cell interactions with the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) peptide in the absence of serum led to enhanced phosphorylation of β3 integrin on tyrosine 747 and of Src phosphorylation at tyrosine 416. These data and others are consistent with an early mechanical mediated activation of β3 integrin that depends on Src given that blocking Src activity reduced β3 phosphorylation following binding to the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) motif.
Integrin signaling and Src activation are known to regulate the architecture of the actin cytoskeleton (66). Moreover, Src family kinases regulate P38MAPK, and activation of P38MAPK is thought to enhance actin stress fiber formation in endothelial cells and regulate angiogenesis in vivo (39-45). The findings provide insight into the coordinated roles of P38MAPK and Src in regulating RGD-dependent endothelial cell signaling through αvβ3 as interactions with the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) cryptic collagen epitope leads to enhanced P38MAPK phosphorylation in a Src-dependent manner. Moreover, RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1)-induced angiogenesis in vivo was associated with enhanced levels of phosphorylated P38MAPK, and this angiogenic response was reduced by an inhibitor of P38MAPK. These findings are consistent with the notion that RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) stimulated angiogenesis depends on P38MAPK.
Recent studies have suggested a role for actin stress fibers and mechanical tension in promoting nuclear accumulation of YAP, where it is thought to function in conjunction TEAD transcription factors in regulating gene expression (46-50). Given data suggesting a role for YAP in regulating endothelial cell growth and angiogenesis, the subcellular distribution of YAP in endothelial cells following interaction with the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) collagen peptide was examined. The data indicate that endothelial cell interaction with the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) epitope was associated with enhanced nuclear accumulation of YAP. Integrin signaling may play a role in the regulation of YAP as studies have implicated a role for β1 integrins expressed in skeletal stem cells and αv integrins expressed in osteoblasts in governing YAP subcellular localization (67,68). The findings are consistent with a mechanism by which αvβ3-mediated binding to the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) epitope, but not the related RGDAPG (SEQ ID NO. 11) epitope stimulates a signaling cascade leading to enhanced nuclear accumulation of YAP that depends on Src and/or P38MAPK. This possibility is supported by the findings that reduced levels of nuclear YAP was detected following αvβ3-mediated interaction with RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) peptide in endothelial cells in which Src or P38MAPK was inhibited. Given the documented role of YAP in governing cell growth coupled with the ability of the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) collagen peptide to stimulate nuclear accumulation of YAP and enhance endothelial cell growth, it is possible that the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) collagen peptide-induced endothelial cell growth is YAP dependent. Consistent with this possibility, no enhancement of endothelial cell growth was detected following knockdown of YAP in endothelial cells stimulated with the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) collagen peptide, even though these cells are capable of proliferating as stimulation with VEGF or high levels of serum enhanced their growth. Given the studies, it is possible that part of the FGF-2 induced angiogenic response observed in the chick CAM model might involve the recruitment of macrophages that generate a previously uncharacterized RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) containing cryptic collagen epitope that binds to αvβ3 leading to Src and P38MAPK activation and nuclear accumulation of YAP. Given that YAP is known to regulate a wide array of genes that may impact angiogenesis and inflammation including CTGF and Cry61, it is likely that the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) collagen epitope may initiate a complex pro-angiogenic program in vivo involving YAP-associated regulation of multiple pro-angiogenic molecules and not simply be restricted to only enhancing endothelial cell growth.
Collectively, the results presented herein provide evidence that a highly conserved RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) containing collagen epitope can be generated by a subset of macrophages and the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) collagen epitope can stimulate pro-inflammatory and angiogenic activity. Binding of the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) collagen epitope to β3 integrin can initiate a signaling pathway in endothelial cells leading to activation of Src and P38MAPK ultimately leading to nuclear accumulation of YAP and enhance cell growth. The results presented herein provide cellular and molecular insight into how an endogenously generated RGD containing cryptic collagen epitope may promote rather that inhibit angiogenesis. Given the complexity of αvβ3 functions and the growing body of evidence that the final outcome of αvβ3 binding may depend on the nature of the particular ligand, the findings provide support for an alternative strategy to help control the biological activity of β3 integrin by specific targeting of endogenous pro-angiogenic ligands of αvβ3 rather than direct targeting of the receptor itself.
Integrin αvβ3 plays a functional role in promoting immune suppression in part by upregulating the expression of the immune checkpoint regulatory protein PDL-1. Thus, targeting αvβ3 with function blocking (signal blocking) antagonists of αvβ3 or reducing expression of αvβ3 led to reduced expression of PDL-1. Thus antagonist of αvβ3 may enhance the anti-tumor efficacy of immune checkpoint therapy. Importantly, while immune check point inhibitors are known to provide some anti-tumor activity in humans, this partial anti-tumor activity is only observed in a fraction of treated subjects. Described herein is the identification of compounds and combination treatment strategies to enhance the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors such as CTLA-4, PDL-1 and PD-1 antibodies.
Therapeutic blockade of immune checkpoint regulatory molecules such as CTLA-4 and PD-1/PDL-1 signaling is known to be associated with significant immune related side effects including inflammation. Given these known side effects of immune checkpoint therapy and the ability of specific ligands of αvβ3 integrin such as the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) containing collagen epitope to potentially induce inflammation in vivo, combining antagonist of αvβ3 with anti-PD-1/PDL-1 antagonists may reduce the inflammatory side effects associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.
Herein, is in vivo animal data, which indicate that melanoma tumors that express integrin αvβ3 express the immune checkpoint protein PDL-1, while the same tumor cell type that was selected for lack of functional αvβ3 exhibited little detectable PDL-1. Second, cellular interactions of tumor cells as well as endothelial cells with ECM proteins (denatured collagen and the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) collagen epitope) that documented ligands of integrin αvβ3 lead to upregulated expression of PDL-1. Third, a function blocking antibody directed specifically to integrin αvβ3 reduced expression of PDL-1 in tumor cells. Finally, an antibody (Mab XL313) that specifically blocks the binding of an RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) epitope to αvβ3 and inhibits downstream signaling from αvβ3 enhanced the anti-tumor efficacy of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (anti-PDL-1) in vivo.
Previous studies have indicated that blockade of immune checkpoint proteins such as PDL-1 can result in some anti-tumor activity. These anti-tumor effects, however were only partial and only occurred in a fraction of the treated subjects. Thus, described herein is the identification of compounds that enhance the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors such as antibodies targeting CTLA-4, PD-1 and/or PDL-1. To this end, studies have suggested that combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with other chemotherapy drugs may enhance the anti-tumor activity. Importantly, a common side effect that can limit the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is the active induction of inflammatory conditions such as dermatitis, pneumonitis and colitis. In this regard, antagonists of the XL313 epitope (Mab XL313) no only enhance the therapeutic activity of an anti-PDL-1 antibody therapy in a mouse model (
Described herein is evidence that an RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) containing cryptic collagen epitope is generated by a subset of macrophages and this motif promoted rather than inhibited angiogenesis. These findings are surprising given the wealth of experimental data indicating the high concentration of RGD peptides inhibit rather than induce angiogenesis (11, 28, 29). Increasing evidence suggests that low concentrations of certain RGD peptides may actually enhance angiogenesis and tumor growth (30), which may explain at least in part the minimal impact of cyclic RGD peptide antagonists of αvβ3 and αvβ5 in human clinical trials (31). In addition to variations in concentrations that alter the biological response of certain RGD peptides, the specific composition of the amino acids C-terminal to RGD motif within naturally occurring epitopes may confer unique pro-angiogenic and inflammatory activity. Taken together, these results are consistent with a mechanism by which the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) collagen epitopes induce angiogenesis and inflammation by stimulating mechanical activation of αvβ3 leading to Src-dependent phosphorylation of P38MAPKinase that promotes nuclear accumulation of the Yes-associated protein (YAP) and enhanced endothelial cell growth.
Reagents, Kits, Chemicals and Antibodies
Ethanol, methanol, acetone, bovine serum albumin (BSA), crystal violet, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), purified human collagen type-IV and collagen type-I, AMPA, 3,3,5,5′ tetramethybenzidine (TMB), phosphatase inhibitor cocktail, and cortisone acetate (CA) were from Sigma (St Louis, Mo.). MMP2 was from Chemicon/Millipore (Billerica, Mass.). FBS was from Science Cell (Carlsbad, Calif.). Fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) was obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, Minn.). Nuclear/Cytoplasmic fractionation kit was from Thermo Scientific (Waltham, Mass.). P38MAPK inhibitor, SB202190 was obtained from CalBoichem (San Diego, Calif.). RIPA buffer, protease inhibitor, and Src inhibitor (PP2) were from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, Calif.). Anti-vWf antibody was from BD Pharmingen (San Diego, Calif.). Antibodies directed to P38MAPK, phospho-P38MAPK (Thr-180/Tyr-182), Src, and phospho-Src (Tyr 416), were from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, Mass.). Antibodies against tubulin, total binding protein (TBP), YAP, β3, and phospho-133 (Tyr747) were from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, Calif.). Anti-Igfbp4 and anti-MMP9 antibodies were obtained from Abcam (Cambridge, Mass.). Function blocking antibodies P4C10 (anti-β1), LM609 (anti-αv β3) and P1F6 (anti-αv β5) were from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, Minn.). HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Promega (Madison, Wis.). Anti-collagen type-I antibody was from Rockland (Limerick, Pa.) and anti-collagen type-IV was from Millipore (Billerica, Mass.). Mouse monoclonal antibodies XL313, and XL166 were developed. Alexa-488, Alexa-594, streptavidin Alexa-594, and phalloidin Alexa-594 labeled antibodies were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, Calif.). Synthetic collagen RGD containing peptides (P-1; CKGDRGDAPGC (SEQ ID NO. 5), P-2; CQGPRGDKGEC (SEQ ID NO. 6), P-3; CAGSRGDGGPC (SEQ ID NO. 7), P-4; CQGIRGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 8), P-5; CRGPRGDQGPC (SEQ ID NO. 9) and peptide control (P-C; CQGPSGAPGEC; SEQ ID NO. 10) were obtained from QED Biosciences (San Diego, Calif.).
Cells and Cell Culture
RAW 264.7 and THP-1 cells were from ATCC (Manassas, Va.) and cultured in DMEM and RPMI respectively in the presence of 10% FBS, 1.0% pen-strep and 1.0% sodium pyruvate. Immortalized BV-2 cells, and were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS, 1.0% pen-strep and 1.0% sodium pyruvate. Human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) were obtained from Science Cell (Carlsbad, Calif.) and cultured in fibroblast growth medium with 2.0% FBS and used between passages 4 to 9. Human retinal microvascular endothelial cells (HRMVECs) were obtained from Applied Cell Biology Institute (Kirkland, Wash.) and cultured in EBM2 supplemented with EGM-2 growth factors. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECS), human microvascular endothelial cells (HMVECS) were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, Va.) and cultured in EBM2 with supplemental growth factors EGM-2 or EGM-2MV respectively. All endothelial cell growth media contained 2% FBS, 1.0% pen-strep and 1.0% sodium pyruvate and used experimentally between passages 3 to 9. For collection of conditioned media, cells were cultured in basal media under serum free conditions for 24 hours. Conditioned media was collected and concentrated 10× using an Amicon Ultracell, 3 kDa centrifugal ultrafiltration cartridge.
Cell Adhesion Assays
RGD peptides (P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4, P-5, and P-C) were immobilized (100 μg/ml) to wells. HUVEC, HMVEC, HRMVEC, and HDF cells were suspended in adhesion buffer (RPMI containing 1 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM MnCl2 and 0.5% BSA) and 1×105 cells were seeded into the wells in the presence or absence of P4C10, LM609, P1F6 or control antibodies (100 μg/ml). Cells were allowed to attach for 25 min at 37° C. Media containing non-attached cells was aspirated and attached cells were washed with PBS and stained with crystal violet. Cell adhesion was quantified by measuring the optical density of eluted dye. Adhesion assays were completed at least three times with triplicate wells.
Collagen Proteolysis and Solid Phase Binding Assays
Collagen type-I and collagen type-IV were heat denatured for 15 min and then incubated with APMA-activated MMP2 for 0.5 h, 1 h, 4 h, 8 h, and 20 h, at 37° C., followed by a five minute boil to deactivate remaining MMP. For solid phase ELISAs, synthetic RGD-containing collagen peptides (P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4, P-5, and P-C) were immobilized (100 μg/ml) to wells or wells were, coated with 10 μg/ml of native or MMP2-proteolyzed collagen type-I or type-IV. Wells were blocked with 1% BSA in PBS for 1 hour and then incubated with 1 μg/ml of Mabs XL313 or XL166 for 1 h, washed, and incubated with antimouse HRP-conjugated antibodies (1:5000). Bound Mabs were detected with a TMB substrate as per manufactures instructions and quantified via spectrometer measurements. All assays were carried out at least four times in triplicate wells.
Chick Cam Inflammation and Angiogenesis Assays
The chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assays were carried out with some modifications (19). For all experiments CAMs of 10-day-old chick embryos obtained from Charles River (North Franklin, Conn.) were separated from the shell membrane. Filter discs either non-treated (inflammation assays) pretreated (angiogenesis assays) with cortisone acetate (3.0 mg/ml) containing RPMI only or FGF-2 (40 ng). CAMs were either non-treated or treated topically with Mab XL313, XL166 or a non-specific control antibody (10 μg/embryo every 24 h for three consecutive treatments). For peptide induction experiments, CAMs were stimulated with 100 ng/ml of the RGD peptides (P-1, P-2, P-C) in the presence or absence of the P38MAPK inhibitor, SB202190 (10 μM). At the end of the incubation period the embryos were sacrificed and the CAM tissues were analyzed. Angiogenesis was quantified by counting the number of angiogenic branching blood vessels within the area of the filter disc. The angiogenic index was determined by subtracting the mean number of blood vessel branch points from untreated CAMs from each experimental condition. Eight to twelve embryos were used per condition and experiments were repeated at least three times.
Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence Analysis
CAMs examined for accumulation of granulation tissue were harvested, fixed in 4% PFA and paraffin embedded and sectioned (4 μm) and stained with Giemsa. CAM tissues analyzed via immunofluorescence were harvested, embedded with OCT, snap frozen and sectioned (4 μM). Frozen sections were fixed in 50% methanol/50% acetone, air dried and blocked with 2.5% BSA for 1 h at 37° C. For expression of the XL313 and XL166 epitopes as well as monocyte/macrophages, FGF-2 stimulated CAM tissues were stained with Mabs XL313, XL166 (50 μg/ml) or KUL1 (1:250) and then incubated with Alexa-488 labeled secondary antibodies (1:2000 dilution). Co-staining of monocytes/macrophages and the Mab XL313 reactive epitope in FGF-2 stimulated CAMs was performed by sequential staining by first probing with KUL1 (1:250) and then with a biotinconjugated Mab XL313 (50 μg/ml), and with secondary antibodies Alexa-488 and streptavidin Alexa-594 (1:2000) respectively. Using a similar strategy, sections of RGD peptide-treated CAM tissues were analyzed for phosphorylated-P38MAPK in angiogenic vessels by co-incubation of anti-phospho-P38MAPK (1:50) and anti-vWf (1:500) antibodies. Subcellular localization of YAP was observed in HUVECS attached to P-2 and P-1 coated glass coverslips. Cells were allowed to attach for 15, 30, or 60 min in the absence of serum and were fixed with 4% PFA. Fixed cells were washed and blocked with 2.5% BSA and stained with anti-YAP (1:200) and phalloidin (1:500). All sections and slides were counter stained with DAPI.
Cell Proliferation Assays
HUVECs (WT, shYAP1 or control transfected) or HRMVECs were plated at 2,000 cells per well with complete EGM-2 media containing 2.0% FBS in the absence or presence of P-1, P-2 or P-C (100 ng/ml) and allowed to grow for 24 hours. Cell growth was monitored using a BrdU or MMT assay kits according to manufacturer's instructions. All assays were completed at least three times in triplicate wells.
Inhibitor Experiments
Endothelial cells (HUVECs or HRMVECs) were incubated in serum free media with 1 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM MnCl2 in the presence of a Src inhibitor, PP2, (10 μM) a P38MAPK inhibitor, SB202190 (10 μM) or vehicle only (DMSO) for 10 min at 37° C. Treated cells were then seeded on to immobilized P-1 and P-2 and lysates were collected at 15 min.
Western Blots
Whole cell and CAM tissue lysates were collected in RIPA buffer supplemented with 1× protease inhibitor and 1× phosphatase inhibitor and were run on polyacrylamide gels using denaturing conditions. Prior to loading the gels, 6× sample buffer was added to each of the lysates (final concentration 1×) and boiled for five minutes. Twenty to 50 μg of total protein were loaded into each lane. For detection of proteins larger than 50 kD, 10% gels were used; for proteins smaller than 50 kD 15% gels were used. Gels were run at 60 volts (v) until the dye front passed through the stacking gel, and then the voltage was increased to 100V for the remainder of the separation. Precision Plus protein standards (Bio-Rad) were used to visualize migration. Protein was transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using a wet tank system and blocked for 1 h using 10% non-fat dried milk in tris-buffered saline with 0.01% Tween-20 (TBS-T). Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies (anti-coll-I (1:250), anti-coll-IV (1:250), Mab XL313 (2 μg/ml), Mab XL166 (2 μg/ml) anti-β-actin (1:5000), anti-phospho-β3 (1:7000), anti-β3 (1:1000), anti-phospho-Src (1:500), anti-Src (1:500), anti-phospho-P38MAPK (1:500), anti P38MAPK (1:2000), anti-YAP (1:500), anti-Tubulin (1:2000), anti-TBP (1:1000)) in 5% BSA in TBS-T overnight at 4° C. with gentle agitation. Membranes were washed 3 times in TBS-T for five minutes. Blots were then incubated with HRP conjugated secondary antibodies (1:15000) in 1% non-fat milk in TBS-T for 1 h. Membranes were washed a second time as indicated above and exposed to chemiluminecent substrate for three minutes prior to exposure to autoradiography film in a dark room. Western blot bands were quantified using Image J software based on pixel intensity.
Transfections and Lentiviral Transductions
Raw cells were transfected with 1 μg of HuSH shRNA plasmids for collagen type I, alpha 2 using Amaxa cell line nucleofector kit V (program #T024). Constructs expressing 21-nucleotide short hairpin RNAs (shRNA) targeting human YAP (shYAP) or non-targeting control (shNT, Sigma-Aldrich, SHC002) were used. Humantargeting shYAP1 lentiviral shRNA was obtained from the Thermo Scientific RNAi consortium (TRCN0000107625). Constructs were packaged into lentivirus, pseudotyped with the vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein. Transduction was performed by incubating cells with lentivirus, and stably transduced cells were subsequently used for studies. All cell lines were verified by morphology and mouse and human YAP-specific PCR. The efficacy of YAP knock down was determined to be between 70%-80%. Endothelial cells were certified mycoplasma-negative by PCR (Lonza), and primary cell cultures were used within the indicated passage numbers. Cells were transduced and selected using puromycin.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using the InStat statistical program for Macintosh computers. Data were analyzed for statistical significance using Student T test. P values <0.05 were considered significant.
Studies have documented the capacity of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins containing the short amino acid sequence RGD to support interactions mediated by integrin receptors (33). The ability of cells to interact with RGD sites within the context of larger glycoproteins depends on many factors, some of which include the adjacent flanking sequences surrounding the core RGD tri-peptide as well as the geometrical configuration of the intact molecule and how these molecules are oriented within the context of the interconnected network of other ECM proteins (24,25,33). Flanking sequences immediately C-terminal to the RGD site can govern integrin selective binding (24,25,33). RGD motifs can be cryptic and inaccessible to cell surface receptors as is illustrated in the case of triple helical collagen (34). In this regard, five different cryptic RGD containing sites exist within human collagen type-I, each with distinct flanking sequences (Table 1).
Five different cryptic RGD containing sites exist within human collagen type-I, each with distinct flanking sequences. Synthetic peptides of these five sequences were generated and designated P-1 through P-5 as shown above. Additionally, a control peptide (P-C) was generated lacking the RGD tri-peptide motif. The sequences in Table 1 correspond to the following SEQ ID NOs.: KGDRGDAPG (SEQ ID NO. 2), QGPRGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 3), AGSRGDGGP (SEQ ID NO. 12), QGIRGDKGE (SEQ ID NO 13); RGPRGDQGP (SEQ ID NO. 14); and QGPSGAPGE (SEQ ID NO. 15).
RGD Peptides are Capable Supporting Cell Adhesion
Due to the importance of the RGD tri-peptide motif, the flanking sequences within collagen type-I that surround the core RGD site may alter its cellular recognition were determined. To assess whether these cryptic collagen RGD motifs were redundant or whether the flanking sequences help convey distinct properties, each of the collagen type-I RGD epitopes were synthesized, along with their associated flanking sequences. The five different RGD peptides were immobilized and their ability to facilitate cell adhesion was examined. As shown in
Cryptic Collagen RGD Epitopes Using Monoclonal Antibodies
To study these cryptic collagen RGD epitopes, monoclonal antibodies were generated. Two distinct antibodies were isolated with the ability to specifically discriminate between different RGD containing epitopes. As shown in
The capacity of Mab XL313 to bind its RGD motif within the context of the full-length collagen molecule was determined. To facilitate these studies, denatured collagen type-1 or IV was incubated with MMP-2 for 12 hrs to generate proteolyzed collagen. MMP-2 mediated proteolysis of collagen type-I and IV resulted in the generation of multiple fragments as indicated by Western blot analysis using antibodies specifically directed to either collagen type-I (
To further examine the generation of the low molecular weight RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) containing collagen fragments, a time course of MMP-2 mediated collagen proteolysis was examined. MMP-2 mediated degradation of collagen type-I resulted in a time dependent generation of Mab XL313 reactive collagen fragments (
Studies have shown that collagen remodeling within the vascular basement membrane can result in exposure of multiple non-RGD cryptic collagen sites including the HUIV26 and HU177 epitopes that can play active roles in angiogenesis (21,23). Given these findings, it was determined whether distinct RGD containing epitopes were exposed in vivo. First, to examine whether these RGD epitopes could be generated during angiogenesis the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) model (19) was used. The CAMs of chick embryos were stimulated with FGF-2, and the generation of RGD containing collagen epitopes was examined using Mabs XL313 and XL166. As shown in
Given the generation of these distinct sets of RGD containing epitopes, their active roles in regulating angiogenesis and inflammation were examined. Angiogenesis was induced within the CAMs of 10-day old chick embryos with FGF-2 using filter discs coated with cortisone acetate (CA) to reduce growth factor associated inflammation. As shown in
FGG-2 Induced Inflammation is Associated with Recruitment and Accumulation of Granulation-Tissue Associated Macrophages.
The chick CAM has been routinely used to assess inflammation and granulation tissue formation, which are largely dependent on infiltration of chick heterophils (the avian equivalent of neutrophils), macrophages and activated fibroblasts (36,37). To study the potential differential biological impact of RGD epitopes, FGF-2 induced inflammation was examined by carrying out similar experiments in the absence of cortisone acetate and quantifying CAM thickening. As shown in
FGF-2 Induced Inflammatory Response in the Presence or Absence of Anti-RGD Specific Antibodies of XL313 and XL166
To examine whether the RGD containing collagen epitopes play a role in the FGF-2 stimulated inflammatory response, this FGF-2 induced inflammatory response was examined in the presence or absence of anti-RGD specific antibodies XL313 and XL166. Quantification indicated that FGF-2 stimulation in the absence of cortisone acetate resulted in approximately 50% of the CAMs showing robust formation of thick granulation tissue (
During angiogenesis and inflammation, multiple cell types including endothelial cells, fibroblasts and macrophages proteolytically remodel extracellular collagen creating a permissive microenvironment that facilitates stromal cell infiltration and new blood vessel growth. A variety of cells including fibroblasts and endothelial cells express collagen and, partially degraded collagen can be internalized and further processed by activated M2-like macrophages leading to the generation of low molecular weight fragments (35,38). Because of the unique pattern of Mab XL313 immunoreactivity observed in vivo, it was determined whether stromal cells associated with angiogenesis and inflammation could generate the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) containing epitope. Whole cell lysates were prepared from fibroblasts and endothelial cells and Western blots were performed. While some Mab XL313 reactive species was detected in lysates of endothelial cells and fibroblasts, the major immunoreactive species migrated between approximately 75Kd to 28Kd indicating that these species were unlikely to represent intact collagen. In addition, minimal amounts of low molecular weight species were detected that corresponds to the major 14Kd to 16Kd collagen fragments detected following MMP-2 mediated proteolysis. While a small amount of an approximately 20 Kd XL313 reactive species was detected in serum free conditioned medium (CM) collected from HUVECS, no significant levels of immunoreactive fragments in fibroblast CM was detected.
Given the minimal reactivity observed in these cell types known to express collagen, and that FGF-2 induced a strong angiogenic and inflammatory response in CAMs that was associated with an extensive infiltration of macrophages, FGF-2 treated CAM tissues for the co-distribution of the XL313 epitope and macrophages was examined. As shown in
Due to the differential expression and bio-distribution of the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) epitope in angiogenic CAM tissues and its expression in macrophage-conditioned medium, it was determined whether a soluble circulating form of this RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) epitope could be generated. To examine this possibility, chick embryos were either un-treated or stimulated with FGF-2 and serum, and collected three days later. As shown in
Soluble Peptide Containing the XL313 Epitope Actively Regulates Angiogenesis and Inflammation
Because a soluble form of the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) epitope was detected in vivo, it was next determined whether a soluble peptide containing the XL313 epitope actively regulated angiogenesis and inflammation. To examine this possibility, the effects of the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) containing collagen peptide on angiogenesis and inflammation in the chick CAM were assessed. As shown in
The effects of the soluble RGD containing collagen peptides on inflammation were examined. As shown in
Studies have indicated that angiogenesis and inflammation in the chick CAM is associated with alterations in MAP kinase signaling including P38MAPK (40,41). To examine mechanisms that regulate angiogenesis following stimulation with the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) containing collagen peptide P-2, CAM tissues from untreated or RGD peptide treated animals was examined. As shown in
The effects of the RGD containing collagen peptides on the levels of phosphorylated P38MAPK in endothelial cells were examined. As shown in
It is well established that multiple integrins recognize RGD amino acid motifs within ECM proteins. However, the ability of an integrin to bind distinct RGD epitopes depends in part on its orientation within the parent molecule and the C-terminal amino acid sequences flanking the RGD motif (25-27). Potential cell surface receptors that mediate interactions with the RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) containing collagen P-2 peptide were identified. The ability of endothelial cells to bind the RGD collagen peptides P-1 and P-2 in the presence or absence of function blocking anti-integrin antibodies was examined. As shown in
RGD Peptides Differentially Altered αvβ3-Mediated Signaling
Because both RGD containing peptides bind αvβ3 coupled with the differential effect of these peptides on angiogenesis and inflammation, it was determined whether the RGD peptides differentially altered αvβ3-mediated signaling. Endothelial cells were allowed to attach to P-1 and P-2 and the relative level of β3-integrin phosphorylation was examined. As shown in
The data indicate that while both RGD containing collagen peptides P-1 and P-2 support an initial β3-integrin-mediated endothelial cell adhesive interaction, collagen peptide P-2 selectively enhanced β3-integrin phosphorylation leading to increased activation of P38MAPK and accelerated actin stress fiber formation. Actin stress fiber formation and enhanced mechanical tension contribute to re-localization of the transcriptional co-activator Yes-associated protein (YAP) to the nucleus (46). Moreover, YAP is implicated in regulating angiogenesis and endothelial cell growth (47,48). YAP localization following endothelial cell binding to the distinct collagen RGD containing peptides in the absence of growth factor stimulation was examined. As shown in
Effects of RGD Containing Collagen Peptides on HUVEC and HRMVEC Growth
Nuclear localization of YAP contributes to the regulation of endothelial cell growth. Therefore, the effects of RGD containing collagen peptides on HUVEC and HRMVEC growth were examined. Addition of soluble P-2 significantly (P<0.05) enhanced endothelial cell growth while stimulation with RGDAPG (SEQ ID NO. 11) peptide P-1 had a minimal effect (
P-2 Stimulated Endothelial Cell Growth Depends on YAP
YAP plays roles in regulating the expression of multiple angiogenesis and inflammatory factors; therefore it was examined whether P-2 stimulated endothelial cell growth depends on YAP. Endothelial cells with YAP specific or non-specific shRNAs were transduced. Addition of soluble RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) containing collagen peptide P-2 to endothelial cells, but not the related RGDAPG (SEQ ID NO. 11) containing peptide P1, (P<0.05) enhanced growth in control transduced cells (
Nude mice were injected with either M21 (αvβ3+) or ML21 (αvβ3−) melanoma cells and were allowed to establish pre-existing tumors. Tumor sections were analyzed for expression of the immune checkpoint regulatory protein PDL-1 by immunofluorescence staining (
M21 melanoma cells that express integrin αvβ3 were transfected with non-specific control shRNA (M21 Cont) or β3 specific shRNA (M21β3Kd) (
Mice were injected with B16F10 melanoma cells and were allowed to establish pre-existing tumors for 5 days prior to treatment (
Mice were injected with melanoma cells and were allowed to establish pre-existing tumors for 5 days prior to treatment. Mice were treated 3 times a week for 14 days with an antibody targeting the αvβ3 binding RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) containing collagen epitope. Tumor sections were analyzed for expression of the immune checkpoint regulatory protein PDL-1 by immunofluorescence staining (
Mice were injected with melanoma cells and were allowed to establish pre-existing tumors for 5 days prior to treatment. Mice were treated 3 times a week for 14 days with an antibody targeting the αvβ3 binding RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1) containing collagen epitope (
Integrin αvβ3 expressing melanoma cells M21 (
Integrin αvβ3 expressing melanoma cells (M21) were seeded onto control uncoated wells or wells immobilized with the XL313 cryptic collagen epitope (RGDKGE (SEQ ID NO. 1)) (
Integrin αvβ3 expressing melanoma cells (M21) were mixed with a control non-specific (normal mouse Ig) or αvβ3 specific antibody (Mab LM609) and was added to wells coated with αvβ3 binding ligand (denatured collagen-IV) (
While the invention has been described in conjunction with the detailed description thereof, the foregoing description is intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended claims. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications are within the scope of the following claims.
The patent and scientific literature referred to herein establishes the knowledge that is available to those with skill in the art. All United States patents and published or unpublished United States patent applications cited herein are incorporated by reference. All published foreign patents and patent applications cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference. Genbank and NCBI submissions indicated by accession number cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference. All other published references, documents, manuscripts and scientific literature cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference.
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/169,463, filed Jun. 1, 2015, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with government support under grant numbers CA091645, HL065301, HL083151, RR015555, GM103392, and RR0181789 awarded by the National Institutes of Health. The government has certain rights in the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7122635 | Brooks et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7345151 | Brooks et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7588760 | Brooks | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 8025883 | Brooks et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
| 9890208 | Brooks et al. | Feb 2018 | B2 |
| 20070048325 | Van et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070259336 | Burbelo et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070259817 | Brooks et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20090028867 | Brooks | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20130309250 | Cogswell | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2002-539076 | Nov 2002 | JP |
| 2016-537340 | Dec 2016 | JP |
| 0040597 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| 2007113648 | Oct 2007 | WO |
| 2015070060 | May 2015 | WO |
| 2016196560 | Dec 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Ames et al. Abstract 1549: Regulation of inflammation and tumor growth by the novel XL313 cryptic ECM element. Cancer Res Apr. 15, 2011 (71) (8 Supplement) 1549 (Year: 2011). |
| Ames et al. Generation of an RGD containing soluble proinflammatory form of the XL313 cryptic collagen epitope during tumor growth and inflammation. Cancer Research 73(8 Supplement):4984-4984, Abstract 4984 (Year: 2013). |
| Lipson et al. From Discovery to Development: Blocking PD-1 and its Ligands. The Melanoma Letter Summer 2013, vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 4-7 (Year: 2013). |
| Menzies et al. Recent advances in melanoma systemic therapy. BRAF inhibitors, CTLA4 antibodies and beyond. European Journal of Cancer. vol. 49, Issue 15, Oct. 2013, pp. 3229-3241 (Year: 2013). |
| Hamid et al. Clinical activity, safety, and biomarkers of MPOL3280A, an engineered PO-L 1 antibody in patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma (mM). Journal of Clinical Onoology 31, No. 15_suppl (May 20, 2013) 9010-9010. (Year: 2013). |
| Menzies, Am., New systemic therapies for metastatic melanoma—MAPK inhibitors and Immunotherapy. Cancer Forum, Nov. 2012, vol. 36 pp. 1-6 (Year: 2012). |
| Iwai et al. Involvement of PD-L 1 on tumor cells in the escape from host immune system and tumor immunotherapy by PD-L 1 blockade. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Sep. 17, 2002;99(19):12293-7. (Year: 2002). |
| Mahoney et al. Combination cancer immunotherapy and new immunomodulatory targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. Aug. 2015;14(8): 561-84 (Year: 2014). |
| Ames et al. Identification of an Endogenously Generated Cryptic Collagen Epitope (XL313) That May Selectively Regulate Angiogenesis by an Integrin Yes-associated Protein (YAP) Mechano-transduction. Journal of Biological J Biol Chem. Feb. 5, 2016; 291(6): 2731-2750 (Year: 2016). |
| Ames et al. The Soluble RGD-containing Cryptic Collagen, XL313, Epitope Induces Angiogenesis Through a p38MAPK Dependent Mechanism. University of Maine GSBSE, Annual Meeting Sep. 2014. pp. 10-11 (Year: 2014). |
| Massi et al. PD-L1 marks a subset of melanomas with a shorter overall survival and distinct genetic and morphological characteristics. Annals of Oncology, vol. 25, Issue 12, Dec. 1, 2014, pp. 2433-2442. (Year: 2014). |
| Cao et al. (Dec. 21, 2011) “Forty-Year Journey of Angiogenesis Translational Research”, Science Translational Medicine, 3(114):114rv3. |
| Caron et al. (Jun. 2016) “Inhibition of Ovarian Tumor Growth by Targeting the HU177 Cryptic Collagen Epitope”, The American Journal of Pathology, 186(6):1649-1661. |
| Chung et al. (Aug. 13, 1993) “A 5′ Element of the Chicken β-globin Domain Serves as an Insulator in Human Erythroid Cells and Protects Against Position Effect in Drosophila”, Cell, 74(3):505-514. |
| Rattan et al. (Nov. 1992) “Protein Synthesis, Post-translational Modifications, and Aging”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 663:48-62. |
| Seifter et al. (1990) “Analysis for Protein Modifications and Nonprotein Cofactors”, Methods in Enzymology, 182:626-646. |
| (Jul. 29, 2019) OncoSec Receives Notice of Allowance from U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for Patent Application with Claims Covering Cytokine-Based Intratumoral Immunotherapies, Oncosec, 2 pages. |
| Adair-Kirk et al.(Feb. 2008) “Fragments of Extracellular Matrix as Mediators of Inflammation”, The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, 40(6-7):1101-1110. |
| Adler et al. (Oct. 22, 2013) “Serum Deprivation Inhibits the Transcriptional Co-Activator YAP and Cell Growth via Phosphorylation of the 130-kDa Isoform of Angiomotin by the LATS1/2 Protein Kinases”, PNAS, 110(43):17368-17373. |
| Alghisi et al. (Feb. 12, 2009) “The Integrin Antagonist Cilengitide Activates αVβ3, Disrupts VE-Cadherin Localization at Cell Junctions and Enhances Permeability in Endothelial Cells”, Plos One, 4(2):14 pages. |
| Atkinson (Dec. 2014) “Redefining the Role(s) of Endothelial αVβ3-Integrin in Angiogenesis”, Biochemical Society Transactions, 42(6):1590-1595. |
| Bergers et al. (Aug. 2008) “Modes of Resistance to Anti-Angiogenic Therapy”, Nature Reviews Cancer, 8 (8):592-603. |
| Blasi et al. (May 1990) “Immortalization of Murine Microglial Cells by a V-Raf / V-Myc Carrying Retrovirus”, Journal of Neuroimmunology, 27(2-3):229-237. |
| Bonnans (Nov. 21, 2014) “Remodelling the Extracellular Matrix in Development and Disease”, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 15:786-801. |
| Brooke et al. (Jan. 2003) “Extracellular Matrix in Vascular Morphogenesis and Disease: Structure Versus Signal”, Trends in Cell Biology, 13(1):51-56. |
| Brooks et al. (1994) “Integrin Alpha v Beta 3 Antagonists Promote Tumor Regression by Inducing Apoptosis of Angiogenic Blood Vessels”, Cell, 79(7):1157-1164. |
| Brooks et al. (Apr. 22, 1994) “Requirement of Vascular Integrin Alpha v Beta 3 for Angiogenesis.”, Science, 264 (5158):569-571. |
| Contois et al. (2015) “Inhibition of Tumor-Associated αVβ3 Integrin Regulates the Angiogenic Switch by Enhancing Expression of IGFBP-4 Leading to Reduced Melanoma Growth and Angiogenesis in Vivo”, Angiogenesis, 18:31-46. |
| Contois et al. (Dec. 1, 2011) “Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Protein-4 Differentially Inhibits Growth Factor-induced Angiogenesis”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 287:1779-1789. |
| Contois et al. (Jun. 2009) “Integrins as Functional Hubs in the Regulation of Pathological Angiogenesis”, Seminars in Cancer Biology, 19(5):318-328. |
| Cretu et al. (May 15, 2007) “Disruption of Endothelial Cell Interactions with the Novel HU177 Cryptic Collagen Epitope Inhibits Angiogenesis”, Clinical Cancer Research, 3(10):3068-3078. |
| Dai et al. (Nov. 22, 2013) “Phosphorylation of Angiomotin by Lats1/2 Kinases Inhibits F-actin Binding, Cell Migration, and Angiogenesis”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 288(47):34041-34051. |
| Danhier et al. (Sep. 11, 2012) “RGD-Based Strategies to Target Alpha(v) Beta(3) Integrin in Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis”, Molecular Pharmaceutics, 9(11):2961-2973. |
| Davis George E. (Mar. 2011) “Angiogenesis and Proteinases: Influence on Vascular Morphogenesis, Stabilization and Regression”, Drug Discovery Today Disease Models, 8(1):13-20. |
| Deryugina et al. (2008) “Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane Models to Quantify Angiogenesis Induced by Inflammatory and Tumor Cells or Purified Effector Molecules”, Methods in enzymology, 444:21-41. |
| Deryugina et al. (2014) “Tissue-Infiltrating Neutrophils Constitute the Major in Vivo Source of Angiogenesis-Inducing MMP-9 in the Tumor Microenvironment”, Neoplasia, 16(10):771-788. |
| Du et al. (May 3, 1991) “Ligands “Activate” Integrin αIIbβ3 (Platelet GPIIb-IIIa)”, Cell, 65(3):409-416. |
| Dupont et al. (Jun. 8, 2011) “Role of YAP/TAZ in Mechanotransduction”, Nature, 474:179-183. |
| Emens et al. (Jan. 2019) “Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Biomarker Analyses of Atezolizumab Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer”, JAMA Oncology, 5(1):74-82. |
| Feng et al. (2008) “The Angiogenic Response Is Dictated by β3 Integrin on Bone Marrow-derived Cells”, Journal of Cell Biology, 183(6):1145-1157. |
| Gajewski et al. (Oct. 2013) “Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment”, Nature Immunology, 14(10):1014-1022. |
| Gangaraju et al. (2011) “Pro-Inflammatory Angiogenesis Is Mediated by p38 MAP Kinase”, Journal of Cellular Physiology, 226(3):800-808. |
| Goepfert et al. (May 28, 2019) “Rational Combination of Parvovirus H1 With CTLA-4 and PD-1 Checkpoint Inhibitors Dampens the Tumor Induced Immune Silencing”, Frontiers in Oncology, 9:12 pages. |
| Gong et al. (Jan. 15, 2010) “G Protein Subunit Galpha13 Binds to Integrin aIIbb3 and Mediates Integrin “Outside-In” Signaling”, Science, 327:340-343. |
| Gong et al. (Aug. 17, 2013) “Sprouty4 Regulates Endothelial Cell Migration via Modulating Integrin β3 Stability Through C-Src”, Angiogenesis, 16(4):861-875. |
| Govindan et al. (Oct. 20, 2017) “Phase III Trial of Ipilimumab Combined With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Advanced Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer”, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 35(30):3449-3457. |
| Grabosch et al. (Mar. 2019) “Cisplatin-Induced Immune Modulation in Ovarian Cancer Mouse Models with Distinct Inflammation Profiles”, Oncogene, 38(13):2380-2393. |
| Greenberg et al. (Nov. 9, 2008) “A Role for VEGF as a Negative Regulator of Pericyte Function and Vessel Maturation”, Nature, 456(7223):809-813. |
| Gurrath et al. (Oct. 1, 1992) “Conformation/activity Studies of Rationally Designed Potent Anti-Adhesive RGD Peptides”, European Journal of Biochemistry, 210(3):911-921. |
| Hangai et al. (Oct. 1, 2002) “Matrix Metalloproteinase-9-Dependent Exposure of a Cryptic Migratory Control Site in Collagen Is Required Before Retinal Angiogenesis”, The American Journal of Pathology, 161(4):1429-1437. |
| Herbst et al. (Nov. 27, 2014) “Predictive Correlates of Response to the Anti-PD-L1 Antibody MPDL3280A in Cancer Patients”, Nature, 515(7528):563-567. |
| Hersey et al. (Mar. 15, 2010) “A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Etaracizumab, a Monoclonal Antibody Against Integrin αVβ3, ± Dacarbazine in Patients with Stage IV Metastatic Melanoma”, Cancer, 116(6):1526-1534. |
| Hodivala-Dilke et al. (2008) “AlphavBeta3 Integrin and Angiogenesis: A Moody Integrin in a Changing Environment”, Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 20:514-519. |
| Jetten et al. (2014) “Anti-Inflammatory M2, but Not Pro-Inflammatory M1 Macrophages Promote Angiogenesis in Vivo”, Angiogenesis, 17(1):109-118. |
| Johnson et al. (Dec. 13, 2013) “The Two Faces of Hippo: Targeting the Hippo Pathway for Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Treatment”, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 13:63-79. |
| Kaneko et al. (May 2, 2014) “Integrin αV in the Mechanical Response of Osteoblast Lineage Cells”, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 447(2):352-357. |
| Keilholz et al. (2019) “Avelumab in Patients with Previously Treated Metastatic Melanoma: Phase 1 B Results from the Javelin Solid Tumor Trial”, Journal for !mmunoTherapy of Cancer, 7(1):13 pages. |
| Kostidis et al. (Aug. 1, 2004) “The Relative Orientation of the Arg and Asp Side Chains Defined by a Pseudodihedral Angle as a Key Criterion for Evaluating the Structure-Activity Relationship of RGD Peptides”, Journal of Peptide Science, 10(8):494-509. |
| Kostine et al. (2018) “Rheumatic Disorders Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Cancer-· Clinical Aspects and Relationship with Tumour Response: A Single-Centre Prospective Cohort Study”, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 77(3):393-398. |
| Kunicki et al. (Feb. 14, 1997) “Molecular Determinants of Arg-Gly-Asp Ligand Specificity for (β3 Integrins”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272:4103-4107. |
| Legler et al. (2001) “Superactivation of Integrin (α)V(β)3 by Low Antagonist Concentrations”, Journal of Cell Science, 114:1545-1553. |
| Liao et al. (Jan. 13, 2015) “Interaction of Kindlin-2 with Integrin β3 Promotes Outside-in Signaling Responses by the αVβ3 Vitronectin Receptor”, Blood, 125(12):1995-2004. |
| Long et al. (Aug. 1, 2019) “Epacadostat plus Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo plus Pembrolizumab in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma (ECH0-301/Keynote-252): A Phase 3, Randomised, Double-Blind Study”, The Lancet Oncology, 20(8):1083-1097. |
| Madsen et al. (Sep. 9, 2013) “M2-like Macrophages Are Responsible for Collagen Degradation Through a Mannose Receptor-mediated Pathway”, The Journal of Cell Biology, 202(6):951-966. |
| Massard et al. (Sep. 10, 2016) “Safety and Efficacy of Durvalumab (MEDI4736), an Anti-Programmed Cell Death Ligand-l Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Urothelial Bladder Cancer”, Journal of Clinical Oncology, 34(26):3119-3125. |
| Mateos et al. (Sep. 2019) “Pembrolizumab plus Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (Keynote-183): A Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial”, The Lancet Haematology, 6(9):e459-e469. |
| Matsumoto et al. (Jan. 7, 2002) “p38 MAP Kinase Negatively Regulates Endothelial Cell Survival, Proliferation, and Differentiation in FGF-2-stimulated Angiogenesis”, The Journal of Cell Biology, 156(1):149-160. |
| Mcmullen et al. (Dec. 15, 2003) “Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Mediated Activation of P38 Is Dependent upon Src and RAFTK/Pyk2”, Oncogene, 23:1275-1282. |
| Mitra et al. (Oct. 2006) “Integrin-Regulated FAK—SRC Signaling in Normal and Cancer Cells”, Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 18(5):516-523. |
| Miyoshi et al. (Sep. 2006) “Tumor-Specific Expression of the RGD-α3(IV)NC1 Domain Suppresses Endothelial Tube Formation and Tumor Growth in Mice”, The Faseb Journal, 20(11):1264-1275. |
| Mogford et al. (1996) “Vascular Smooth Muscle Alpha v Beta 3 Integrin Mediates Arteriolar Vasodilation in Response to RGD Peptides”, Circulation Research, 79(4):821-826. |
| Montgomery et al. (Sep. 13, 1994) “Integrin Alpha v Beta 3 Rescues Melanoma Cells from Apoptosis in Three-Dimensional Dermal Collagen”, PNAS, 91(19):8856-8860. |
| Moserle et al. (Jan. 2014) “Antiangiogenic Therapies: Going beyond Their Limits”, Cancer Discovery, 4 (1):31-41. |
| Petitclerc et al. (Mar. 17, 2000) “New Functions for Non-collagenous Domains of Human Collagen Type IV: Novel Integrin Ligands Inhibiting Angiogenesis and Tumour Growth InVivo”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275 (11):8051-8061. |
| Pickup et al. (Dec. 1, 2014) “The Extracellular Matrix Modulates the Hallmarks of Cancer”, EMBO Reports, 15 (12):1243-1253. |
| Pierschbacher (Dec. 25, 1987) “Influence of Stereochemistry of the Sequence Arg-Gly-Asp-Xaa on Binding Specificity in Cell Adhesion”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 262(36):17294-17298. |
| Reynolds et al. (Jan. 1, 2002) “Enhanced Pathological Angiogenesis in Mice Lacking beta3 Integrin or beta3 and beta5 Integrins”, Nature Medicine, 8(1):27-34. |
| Reynolds et al. (Mar. 22, 2009) “Stimulation of Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis by Low Concentrations of RGD-Mimetic Integrin Inhibitors”, Nature Medicine, 15(4):392-400. |
| Robinson et al. (Oct. 2011) “The Role of β3-Integrins in Tumor Angiogenesis: Context Is Everything”, Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 23(5):630-637. |
| Rousseau et al. (1997) “p38 MAP Kinase Activation by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Mediates Actin Reorganization and Cell Migration in Human Endothelial Cells”, Oncogene, 15(18):2169-2177. |
| Ruoslahti (Nov. 1996) “RGD and Other Recognition Sequences for Intergrins”, Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 12:697-715. |
| Schnoor et al. (2008) “Production of Type VI Collagen by Human Macrophages: A New Dimension in Macrophage Functional Heterogeneity”, Journal of immunology, 180(8):5707-5719. |
| Shen et al. (Oct. 2012) “Inside-Out, Outside-In, and Inside-Outside-In: G Protein Signaling in Integrin-Mediated Cell Adhesion, Spreading, and Retraction”, Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 24(5):600-606. |
| Shen et al. (Jan. 30, 2015) “YAP Regulates S-Phase Entry in Endothelial Cells”, Plos One, 10(1):19 pages. |
| Skjot-Arkil et al. (2010) “Macrophage-Mediated Proteolytic Remodeling of the Extracellular Matrix in Atherosclerosis Results in Neoepitopes: A Potential New Class of Biochemical Markers”, Assay and Drug Development Technologies, 8(5):542-552. |
| Somanath et al. (2009) “Cooperation Between Integrin αvβ3 and VEGFR2 in Angiogenesis”, Angiogenesis, 12 (2):177-185. |
| Steri et al. (Jan. 3, 2014) “Acute Depletion of Endothelial β3-Integrin Transiently Inhibits Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis in Mice”, Circulation Research, 114(1):79-91. |
| Stupp et al. (Sep. 2014) “Cilengitide Combined with Standard Treatment for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma with Methylated MGMT Promoter (Centric EORTC 26071-22072 Study): A Multicentre, Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial”, The Lancet Oncology, 15(10):1100-1108. |
| Sudhakar (Apr. 15, 2003) “Human Tumstatin and Human Endostatin Exhibit Distinct Antiangiogenic Activities Mediated by αvβ3 and α5β1 Integrins”, PNAS, 100(8):4766-4771. |
| Tang et al. (2013) “MT1-MMP-Dependent Control of Skeletal Stem Cell Commitment via a β1-integrin/YAP/TAZ Signaling Axis”, Developmental Cell, 25(4):402-416. |
| Tran et al. (Nov. 2, 2017) “Cisplatin Alters Antitumor Immunity and Synergizes with PD-1/PD-LI Inhibition in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma”, Cancer Immunology Research, 5(12):1141-1151. |
| Von Wichert et al. (Apr. 14, 2003) “RPTP-αActs as a Transducer of Mechanical Force on αV/β3-Integrin—cytoskeleton Linkages”, The Journal of Cell Biology, 161(1):143-153. |
| Wang et al. (Sep. 16, 2019) “HPV-Positive Status Associated with Inflamed Immune Microenvironment and Improved Response to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Head and Neck Squamous Cell ⋅ Carcinoma”, Scientific Reports, 13404, 9:10 pages. |
| Xu et al. (Sep. 3, 2001) “Proteolytic Exposure of a Cryptic Site Within Collagen Type IV Is Required for Angiogenesis and Tumor Growth in Vivo”, The Journal of Cell Biology, 154(5):1069-1079. |
| Yip et al. (Nov. 1, 1997) “An Arg-Gly-Asp Peptide Stimulates Constriction in Rat Afferent Arteriole”, The American Journal of Physiology, 273(5):F768-776. |
| Yu et al. (Dec. 20, 2011) “Early Integrin Binding to Arg-Gly-Asp Peptide Activates Actin Polymerization and Contractile Movement That Stimulates Outward Translocation”, PNAS, 108(51):20585-20590. |
| Zwadlo-Klarwasser et al. (Mar. 2001) “The Chorioallantoic Membrane of the Chick Embryo as a Simple Model for the Study of the Angiogenic and Inflammatory Response to Biomaterials”, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 12:195-199. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170065716 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62169463 | Jun 2015 | US |
